Search (18 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × type_ss:"n"
  1. ISO 8879: Standard Generalized Markup Language (SGML) (1986) 0.22
    0.22455291 = product of:
      0.44910583 = sum of:
        0.40143248 = weight(_text_:markup in 6201) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.40143248 = score(doc=6201,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.27638784 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.572923 = idf(docFreq=167, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042049456 = queryNorm
            1.4524245 = fieldWeight in 6201, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              6.572923 = idf(docFreq=167, maxDocs=44218)
              0.15625 = fieldNorm(doc=6201)
        0.047673345 = product of:
          0.14302003 = sum of:
            0.14302003 = weight(_text_:language in 6201) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.14302003 = score(doc=6201,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16497234 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.9232929 = idf(docFreq=2376, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.042049456 = queryNorm
                0.8669334 = fieldWeight in 6201, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.9232929 = idf(docFreq=2376, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.15625 = fieldNorm(doc=6201)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
  2. Bechhofer, S.; Harmelen, F. van; Hendler, J.; Horrocks, I.; McGuinness, D.L.; Patel-Schneider, P.F.; Stein, L.A.: OWL Web Ontology Language Reference (2004) 0.09
    0.088905826 = product of:
      0.17781165 = sum of:
        0.14050137 = weight(_text_:markup in 4684) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.14050137 = score(doc=4684,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.27638784 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.572923 = idf(docFreq=167, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042049456 = queryNorm
            0.5083486 = fieldWeight in 4684, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              6.572923 = idf(docFreq=167, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4684)
        0.037310295 = product of:
          0.111930884 = sum of:
            0.111930884 = weight(_text_:language in 4684) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.111930884 = score(doc=4684,freq=10.0), product of:
                0.16497234 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.9232929 = idf(docFreq=2376, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.042049456 = queryNorm
                0.6784828 = fieldWeight in 4684, product of:
                  3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                    10.0 = termFreq=10.0
                  3.9232929 = idf(docFreq=2376, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4684)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    The Web Ontology Language OWL is a semantic markup language for publishing and sharing ontologies on the World Wide Web. OWL is developed as a vocabulary extension of RDF (the Resource Description Framework) and is derived from the DAML+OIL Web Ontology Language. This document contains a structured informal description of the full set of OWL language constructs and is meant to serve as a reference for OWL users who want to construct OWL ontologies.
  3. ISO 12083: Electronic manuscript preparation and markup (1994) 0.07
    0.07025068 = product of:
      0.28100273 = sum of:
        0.28100273 = weight(_text_:markup in 2324) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.28100273 = score(doc=2324,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.27638784 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.572923 = idf(docFreq=167, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042049456 = queryNorm
            1.0166972 = fieldWeight in 2324, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              6.572923 = idf(docFreq=167, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=2324)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
  4. OWL Web Ontology Language Test Cases (2004) 0.02
    0.024110693 = product of:
      0.096442774 = sum of:
        0.096442774 = product of:
          0.14466415 = sum of:
            0.09908719 = weight(_text_:language in 4685) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.09908719 = score(doc=4685,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.16497234 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.9232929 = idf(docFreq=2376, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.042049456 = queryNorm
                0.60062915 = fieldWeight in 4685, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  3.9232929 = idf(docFreq=2376, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4685)
            0.045576964 = weight(_text_:22 in 4685) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.045576964 = score(doc=4685,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14725003 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.042049456 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4685, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4685)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    This document contains and presents test cases for the Web Ontology Language (OWL) approved by the Web Ontology Working Group. Many of the test cases illustrate the correct usage of the Web Ontology Language (OWL), and the formal meaning of its constructs. Other test cases illustrate the resolution of issues considered by the Working Group. Conformance for OWL documents and OWL document checkers is specified.
    Date
    14. 8.2011 13:33:22
  5. Z39.19-1993: Guidelines for the construction, format, and management of monolingual thesauri (1993) 0.02
    0.01713083 = product of:
      0.06852332 = sum of:
        0.06852332 = product of:
          0.10278498 = sum of:
            0.05720801 = weight(_text_:language in 4092) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.05720801 = score(doc=4092,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16497234 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.9232929 = idf(docFreq=2376, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.042049456 = queryNorm
                0.34677336 = fieldWeight in 4092, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.9232929 = idf(docFreq=2376, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4092)
            0.045576964 = weight(_text_:22 in 4092) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.045576964 = score(doc=4092,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14725003 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.042049456 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4092, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4092)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    This 1993 edition is the authoritative guide constructing single-language thesauri, one of the most powerful tools for information retrieval. Written by experts, Z39.19 shows how to formulate descriptors, establish relationships among terms, and present the information in print and on a screen. Also included are thesaurus maintenance procedures and recommended features for thesaurus management systems
    Footnote
    Rez. in: Knowledge organization 22(1995) no.3/4, S.180-181 (M. Hudon)
  6. Z39.53-199X: Language codes (1993) 0.01
    0.010113044 = product of:
      0.040452175 = sum of:
        0.040452175 = product of:
          0.12135652 = sum of:
            0.12135652 = weight(_text_:language in 8038) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.12135652 = score(doc=8038,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.16497234 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.9232929 = idf(docFreq=2376, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.042049456 = queryNorm
                0.7356174 = fieldWeight in 8038, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.9232929 = idf(docFreq=2376, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=8038)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    This draft standard defines almost 400 separate three-character alphabetic codes to indicate language in the interchange of information. The list is based on the US MARC list, the revision updates the first one of 1987
  7. OWL Web Ontology Language Guide (2004) 0.01
    0.00729846 = product of:
      0.02919384 = sum of:
        0.02919384 = product of:
          0.08758152 = sum of:
            0.08758152 = weight(_text_:language in 4687) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08758152 = score(doc=4687,freq=12.0), product of:
                0.16497234 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.9232929 = idf(docFreq=2376, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.042049456 = queryNorm
                0.5308861 = fieldWeight in 4687, product of:
                  3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                    12.0 = termFreq=12.0
                  3.9232929 = idf(docFreq=2376, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4687)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    The World Wide Web as it is currently constituted resembles a poorly mapped geography. Our insight into the documents and capabilities available are based on keyword searches, abetted by clever use of document connectivity and usage patterns. The sheer mass of this data is unmanageable without powerful tool support. In order to map this terrain more precisely, computational agents require machine-readable descriptions of the content and capabilities of Web accessible resources. These descriptions must be in addition to the human-readable versions of that information. The OWL Web Ontology Language is intended to provide a language that can be used to describe the classes and relations between them that are inherent in Web documents and applications. This document demonstrates the use of the OWL language to - formalize a domain by defining classes and properties of those classes, - define individuals and assert properties about them, and - reason about these classes and individuals to the degree permitted by the formal semantics of the OWL language. The sections are organized to present an incremental definition of a set of classes, properties and individuals, beginning with the fundamentals and proceeding to more complex language components.
  8. OWL 2 Web Ontology Language Document Overview (2009) 0.01
    0.0072251074 = product of:
      0.02890043 = sum of:
        0.02890043 = product of:
          0.08670129 = sum of:
            0.08670129 = weight(_text_:language in 3060) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08670129 = score(doc=3060,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.16497234 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.9232929 = idf(docFreq=2376, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.042049456 = queryNorm
                0.5255505 = fieldWeight in 3060, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  3.9232929 = idf(docFreq=2376, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3060)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    The OWL 2 Web Ontology Language, informally OWL 2, is an ontology language for the Semantic Web with formally defined meaning. OWL 2 ontologies provide classes, properties, individuals, and data values and are stored as Semantic Web documents. OWL 2 ontologies can be used along with information written in RDF, and OWL 2 ontologies themselves are primarily exchanged as RDF documents. This document serves as an introduction to OWL 2 and the various other OWL 2 documents. It describes the syntaxes for OWL 2, the different kinds of semantics, the available profiles (sub-languages), and the relationship between OWL 1 and OWL 2.
  9. OWL Web Ontology Language Use Cases and Requirements (2004) 0.01
    0.0067420295 = product of:
      0.026968118 = sum of:
        0.026968118 = product of:
          0.08090435 = sum of:
            0.08090435 = weight(_text_:language in 4686) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08090435 = score(doc=4686,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.16497234 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.9232929 = idf(docFreq=2376, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.042049456 = queryNorm
                0.4904116 = fieldWeight in 4686, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.9232929 = idf(docFreq=2376, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4686)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    This document specifies usage scenarios, goals and requirements for a web ontology language. An ontology formally defines a common set of terms that are used to describe and represent a domain. Ontologies can be used by automated tools to power advanced services such as more accurate web search, intelligent software agents and knowledge management.
  10. Z39.58-1992: Common command language for online interactive information retrieval (1992) 0.01
    0.005959168 = product of:
      0.023836672 = sum of:
        0.023836672 = product of:
          0.07151002 = sum of:
            0.07151002 = weight(_text_:language in 4801) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07151002 = score(doc=4801,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16497234 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.9232929 = idf(docFreq=2376, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.042049456 = queryNorm
                0.4334667 = fieldWeight in 4801, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.9232929 = idf(docFreq=2376, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4801)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
  11. Codes for the representation of languages for information interchange (2001) 0.01
    0.005959168 = product of:
      0.023836672 = sum of:
        0.023836672 = product of:
          0.07151002 = sum of:
            0.07151002 = weight(_text_:language in 3927) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07151002 = score(doc=3927,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16497234 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.9232929 = idf(docFreq=2376, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.042049456 = queryNorm
                0.4334667 = fieldWeight in 3927, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.9232929 = idf(docFreq=2376, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3927)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    The newly revised standard of 3-letter codes for languages is based an the MARC language codes and ISO 6392/B
  12. Köstlbacher, A. (Übers.): OWL Web Ontology Language Überblick (2004) 0.01
    0.005056522 = product of:
      0.020226087 = sum of:
        0.020226087 = product of:
          0.06067826 = sum of:
            0.06067826 = weight(_text_:language in 4681) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06067826 = score(doc=4681,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.16497234 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.9232929 = idf(docFreq=2376, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.042049456 = queryNorm
                0.3678087 = fieldWeight in 4681, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.9232929 = idf(docFreq=2376, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4681)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    Die OWL Web Ontology Language wurde entwickelt, um es Anwendungen zu ermöglichen den Inhalt von Informationen zu verarbeiten anstatt die Informationen dem Anwender nur zu präsentieren. OWL erleichtert durch zusätzliches Vokabular in Verbindung mit formaler Semantik stärkere Interpretationsmöglichkeiten von Web Inhalten als dies XML, RDF und RDFS ermöglichen. OWL besteht aus drei Untersprachen mit steigender Ausdrucksmächtigkeit: OWL Lite, OWL DL and OWL Full. Dieses Dokument wurde für Leser erstellt, die einen ersten Eindruck von den Möglichkeiten bekommen möchten, die OWL bietet. Es stellt eine Einführung in OWL anhand der Beschreibung der Merkmale der drei Untersprachen von OWL dar. Kenntnisse von RDF Schema sind hilfreich für das Verständnis, aber nicht unbedingt erforderlich. Nach der Lektüre dieses Dokuments können sich interessierte Leser für detailliertere Beschreibungen und ausführliche Beispiele der Merkmale von OWL dem OWL Guide zuwenden. Die normative formale Definition von OWL findet sich unter OWL Semantics and Abstract Syntax.
  13. OWL Web Ontology Language Overview (2004) 0.01
    0.005056522 = product of:
      0.020226087 = sum of:
        0.020226087 = product of:
          0.06067826 = sum of:
            0.06067826 = weight(_text_:language in 4682) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06067826 = score(doc=4682,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.16497234 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.9232929 = idf(docFreq=2376, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.042049456 = queryNorm
                0.3678087 = fieldWeight in 4682, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.9232929 = idf(docFreq=2376, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4682)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    The OWL Web Ontology Language is designed for use by applications that need to process the content of information instead of just presenting information to humans. OWL facilitates greater machine interpretability of Web content than that supported by XML, RDF, and RDF Schema (RDF-S) by providing additional vocabulary along with a formal semantics. OWL has three increasingly-expressive sublanguages: OWL Lite, OWL DL, and OWL Full. This document is written for readers who want a first impression of the capabilities of OWL. It provides an introduction to OWL by informally describing the features of each of the sublanguages of OWL. Some knowledge of RDF Schema is useful for understanding this document, but not essential. After this document, interested readers may turn to the OWL Guide for more detailed descriptions and extensive examples on the features of OWL. The normative formal definition of OWL can be found in the OWL Semantics and Abstract Syntax.
  14. OWL Web Ontology Language Semantics and Abstract Syntax (2004) 0.01
    0.005056522 = product of:
      0.020226087 = sum of:
        0.020226087 = product of:
          0.06067826 = sum of:
            0.06067826 = weight(_text_:language in 4683) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06067826 = score(doc=4683,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.16497234 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.9232929 = idf(docFreq=2376, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.042049456 = queryNorm
                0.3678087 = fieldWeight in 4683, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.9232929 = idf(docFreq=2376, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4683)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    This description of OWL, the Web Ontology Language being designed by the W3C Web Ontology Working Group, contains a high-level abstract syntax for both OWL DL and OWL Lite, sublanguages of OWL. A model-theoretic semantics is given to provide a formal meaning for OWL ontologies written in this abstract syntax. A model-theoretic semantics in the form of an extension to the RDF semantics is also given to provide a formal meaning for OWL ontologies as RDF graphs (OWL Full). A mapping from the abstract syntax to RDF graphs is given and the two model theories are shown to have the same consequences on OWL ontologies that can be written in the abstract syntax.
  15. Hori, M.; Euzenat, J.; Patel-Schneider, P.F.: OWL Web Ontology Language XML Presentation Syntax (2003) 0.00
    0.004767334 = product of:
      0.019069336 = sum of:
        0.019069336 = product of:
          0.05720801 = sum of:
            0.05720801 = weight(_text_:language in 4680) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.05720801 = score(doc=4680,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16497234 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.9232929 = idf(docFreq=2376, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.042049456 = queryNorm
                0.34677336 = fieldWeight in 4680, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.9232929 = idf(docFreq=2376, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4680)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
  16. Statement of principles (1961) 0.00
    0.0033534872 = product of:
      0.013413949 = sum of:
        0.013413949 = product of:
          0.040241845 = sum of:
            0.040241845 = weight(_text_:29 in 3285) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.040241845 = score(doc=3285,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14791684 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.042049456 = queryNorm
                0.27205724 = fieldWeight in 3285, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3285)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Date
    5.12.2016 16:29:48
  17. RDA Toolkit (1) (2017) 0.00
    0.002979584 = product of:
      0.011918336 = sum of:
        0.011918336 = product of:
          0.03575501 = sum of:
            0.03575501 = weight(_text_:language in 3996) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03575501 = score(doc=3996,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16497234 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.9232929 = idf(docFreq=2376, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.042049456 = queryNorm
                0.21673335 = fieldWeight in 3996, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.9232929 = idf(docFreq=2376, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3996)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    Am 14. Februar 2017 ist das neue Release des RDA Toolkits<http://www.rdatoolkit.org/development/February2017release> erschienen. Das Release enthält im englischen Text alle Änderungen aus dem Fast-Track-Verfahren RSC/Sec/6<http://www.rda-rsc.org/sites/all/files/RSC-Sec-6.pdf>. Ebenso enthalten sind die Updates der LC-PCC PS (Library of Congress-Program for Cooperative Cataloging Policy Statements) und der MLA Best Practices. Neu aufgenommen wurden die Policy Statements der Library and Archives Canada in Kooperation mit der Bibliothèque et Archives nationales du Québec. Diese sind sowohl im Register als auch im Text über ein Icon (dunkel violett) mit den Buchstaben LAC/BAC-BAnQ ansteuerbar. Ab sofort ist es möglich sich auch die Policy Statements in einer zweisprachigen Ansicht anzeigen zu lassen, dazu wurde die Funktion Select Language und Dual View in der Symbolliste unter dem Reiter "Ressourcen" eingefügt. Im deutschen Text wurden ausschließlich Änderungen an den Anwendungsrichtlinien für den deutschsprachigen Raum (D-A-CH) eingearbeitet. Die dazugehörige Übersicht (Kurz- bzw. Langversion) finden Sie im RDA-Info-Wiki<https://wiki.dnb.de/x/1hLSBg>. Mitte April 2017 wird das nächste Release des RDA Toolkit erscheinen, eingearbeitet werden die verabschiedeten Proposals, die im November 2016 vom RDA Steering Committee (RSC) beschlossen wurden. Die Umsetzung der Änderungen in der deutschen Übersetzung aus den Fast-Track-Dokumenten RSC/Sec/4 und RSC/Sec/5 und RSC/Sec/6 sind für den August 2017 geplant.
  18. Bibliotheks- und Dokumentationswesen : Gestaltung und Erschließung von Dokumenten, Bibliotheksmanagement, Codierungs- und Nummerungssysteme, Bestandserhaltung in Archiven und Bibliotheken (2002) 0.00
    0.0016446172 = product of:
      0.0065784687 = sum of:
        0.0065784687 = product of:
          0.019735405 = sum of:
            0.019735405 = weight(_text_:22 in 1704) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.019735405 = score(doc=1704,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.14725003 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.042049456 = queryNorm
                0.1340265 = fieldWeight in 1704, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.015625 = fieldNorm(doc=1704)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    Am Anfang war das Wort. Sehr viel später erfand ein gewisser Herr Gutenberg ein Handgießinstrument zur Herstellung von Drucktypen. Und was sich daraus entwickelte, ist bekannt: Die moderne Informations- und Kommunikationsgesellschaft, deren Dynamik nicht zuletzt von der Effektivität der Daten-, Dokumenten- und Schriftgutverwaltung abhängt. Beim DIN-Taschenbuch 343 Bibliotheks- und Dokumentationswesen handelt es sich um ein Normenkompendium, das genau diese Verfahren aufgreift: Es stellt der interessierten Fachöffentlichkeit insgesamt 22 nationale und internationale Normen der Bereiche "Gestaltung und Erschließung von Dokumenten", "Bibliotheksmanagement", "Codierungs- und Nummerungssysteme" sowie "Bestandserhaltung in Archiven und Bibliotheken" vor. Die Auswahl der Normen verdeutlicht zweierlei: Zum einen den Einfluss der sich ständig weiterentwickelnden und dabei konvergierenden Technologien, der u.a. das Publizieren und die Datenrecherche beeinflusst. Zum zweiten die Notwendigkeit, neue Anforderungen zu berücksichtigen, die sich aus dem stetig zunehmenden internationalen Datenaustausch ergeben. Das DIN-Taschenbuch verschafft einen genauen Überblick über den Zusammenhang zwischen einschlägigen DIN- und ISO-Normen und klärt über Namencodes von Ländern und deren Untereinheiten auf (DIN ISO 3166-2:2001). Komplettiert wird das Werk durch den vollständigen Abdruck des DINFachberichts 13 "Bau- und Nutzungplanung von wissenschaftlichen Bibliotheken". Dort werden Bibliotheken als Servicezentren verstanden, die zunehmend digitalisierte Informationsquellen bereit stellen.
    Content
    Enthält 22 vollständig abgedruckte nationale und internationale Normen für die Bereiche Archiv-, Bibliotheks-, Dokumentations-, Museums- und Verlagswesen
    Footnote
    Rez. in: ABI-Technik 21(2002) H.3, S.294-295 (K. Weishaupt); "Im Deutschen Institut für Normung ist der Normenausschuss Bibliotheks- und Dokumentationswesen (NABD) verantwortlich für die nationale Normung für das Erstellen, Publizieren, Erschließen, Erhalten, Wiederauffinden, Vermitteln und die Nutzung von Dokumenten, Daten und Schriftgut für die Bereiche Archiv-, Bibliotheks, Dokumentations-, Museumsund Verlagswesen. Mit dem neuen DIN-Taschenbuch will er einen Überblick über die DIN-Normen geben, die in den letzten Jahren auf internationaler Ebene unter aktiver deutscher Mitarbeit veröffentlicht, dann als DIN-Normen übernommen worden sind und die den veränderten Anforderungen der Informations- und Kommunikationsgesellschaft Rechnung tragen - so die eigenen Angaben des Ausschusses im Vorwort (S. XI). Vor dem Hintergrund dieses recht offen formulierten Anspruches kommt es zu einer Zusammenstellung von 22 Normen, die auf den ersten Blick recht bunt gemischt wirkt: Abgedruckt sind Normen zur Erstellung und Weiterentwicklung von Thesauri, zu Titelangaben von Dokumenten, Kürzungs- und Transliterationsregeln, Sortierregeln, Abschnittsnummerierungen, Ländernamen, zur ISBN, ISSN sowie den Standardnummern ISMN und ISWC für Musikalien, zu Leistungsindikatoren für Bibliotheken und zu Lebensdauer-Klassen von Papier und Karton, Anforderungen an die Aufbewahrung von Archiv- und Bibliotheksgut und zur Alterungsbeständigkeit von Schriften. Der DIN-Fachbericht "Bau- und Nutzungsplanung von wissenschaftlichen Bibliotheken" rundet das Werk ab. Negativ ausgedrückt: Es wird niemanden geben, der für seinen beruflichen Alltag all diese Normen benötigt. Die positive Sicht: Das DIN-Taschenbuch deckt so viele Themen ab, dass der Kreis der Interessierten recht groß sein dürfte. Auf alle Fälle ist beeindruckend, zu wie vielen Themen aus den Bereich des Bibliotheks- und Dokumentationswesens es Normen gibt; vermutlich ist deren Existenz nicht einmal der Fachöffentlichkeit in vollem Umfang bekannt. Ein solches Beispiel ist DIN 1505, Teil 2: "Titelangaben von Dokumenten: Zitierregeln"; diese Norm wendet sich "an Autoren, Verleger und Redakteure und soll für Literaturzusammenstellungen, für Literaturverzeichnisse am Ende einer Schrift bzw. eines Beitrags, im Kontext oder in Fußnoten benutzt werden" (S. 38). Damit ist sie praktisch für alle relevant, die wissenschaftlich arbeiten und Texte schreiben - aber kaum jemand kennt diese Norm! Viele Zeitschriften und Fachgesellschaften haben ihre eigenen Regeln, nach denen zitiert werden soll. Im Institut Arbeit und Technik in Gelsenkirchen ist vor einigen Jahren mit Förderung der Deutschen Forschungsgemeinschaft die Software LibLink entwickelt worden, mit der aus MAB-Daten, die aus einem Bibliothekskatalog exportiert worden waren, automatisiert Literaturverzeichnisse für wissenschaftliche Texte erstellt werden sollten.