-
ISO 8879: Standard Generalized Markup Language (SGML) (1986)
0.22
0.22455291 = product of:
0.44910583 = sum of:
0.40143248 = weight(_text_:markup in 6201) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.40143248 = score(doc=6201,freq=2.0), product of:
0.27638784 = queryWeight, product of:
6.572923 = idf(docFreq=167, maxDocs=44218)
0.042049456 = queryNorm
1.4524245 = fieldWeight in 6201, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
6.572923 = idf(docFreq=167, maxDocs=44218)
0.15625 = fieldNorm(doc=6201)
0.047673345 = product of:
0.14302003 = sum of:
0.14302003 = weight(_text_:language in 6201) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.14302003 = score(doc=6201,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16497234 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9232929 = idf(docFreq=2376, maxDocs=44218)
0.042049456 = queryNorm
0.8669334 = fieldWeight in 6201, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.9232929 = idf(docFreq=2376, maxDocs=44218)
0.15625 = fieldNorm(doc=6201)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
-
Smith, J.M.: ¬The Standard Generalized Markup Language (SGML) : guidelines for editors and publishers (1987)
0.15
0.15384616 = product of:
0.30769232 = sum of:
0.28385565 = weight(_text_:markup in 5941) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.28385565 = score(doc=5941,freq=4.0), product of:
0.27638784 = queryWeight, product of:
6.572923 = idf(docFreq=167, maxDocs=44218)
0.042049456 = queryNorm
1.0270193 = fieldWeight in 5941, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
6.572923 = idf(docFreq=167, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5941)
0.023836672 = product of:
0.07151002 = sum of:
0.07151002 = weight(_text_:language in 5941) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07151002 = score(doc=5941,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16497234 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9232929 = idf(docFreq=2376, maxDocs=44218)
0.042049456 = queryNorm
0.4334667 = fieldWeight in 5941, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.9232929 = idf(docFreq=2376, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5941)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- Guidelines for editors and publishers of scholarly texts to which markup has been added in accordance with the SGML
-
Smith, J.M.: ¬The Standard Generalized Markup Language (SGML) : guidelines for authors (1987)
0.15
0.15384616 = product of:
0.30769232 = sum of:
0.28385565 = weight(_text_:markup in 5946) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.28385565 = score(doc=5946,freq=4.0), product of:
0.27638784 = queryWeight, product of:
6.572923 = idf(docFreq=167, maxDocs=44218)
0.042049456 = queryNorm
1.0270193 = fieldWeight in 5946, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
6.572923 = idf(docFreq=167, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5946)
0.023836672 = product of:
0.07151002 = sum of:
0.07151002 = weight(_text_:language in 5946) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07151002 = score(doc=5946,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16497234 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9232929 = idf(docFreq=2376, maxDocs=44218)
0.042049456 = queryNorm
0.4334667 = fieldWeight in 5946, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.9232929 = idf(docFreq=2376, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5946)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- Guidelines for authors of scholarly publications who wish to prepare documents for a publisher on existing text entry devices, word processors and personal computers, adding markup to the text in accordance with the SGML
-
Bryan, M.: SGML: an author's guide to the Standard Generalized Markup Language (1988)
0.11
0.11227646 = product of:
0.22455291 = sum of:
0.20071624 = weight(_text_:markup in 7524) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.20071624 = score(doc=7524,freq=2.0), product of:
0.27638784 = queryWeight, product of:
6.572923 = idf(docFreq=167, maxDocs=44218)
0.042049456 = queryNorm
0.72621226 = fieldWeight in 7524, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
6.572923 = idf(docFreq=167, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=7524)
0.023836672 = product of:
0.07151002 = sum of:
0.07151002 = weight(_text_:language in 7524) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07151002 = score(doc=7524,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16497234 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9232929 = idf(docFreq=2376, maxDocs=44218)
0.042049456 = queryNorm
0.4334667 = fieldWeight in 7524, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.9232929 = idf(docFreq=2376, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=7524)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
-
Coombs, J.H.; Renear, A.H.; DeRose, S.J.: Markup systems and the future of scholarly text processing (1987)
0.09
0.08691269 = product of:
0.34765077 = sum of:
0.34765077 = weight(_text_:markup in 593) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.34765077 = score(doc=593,freq=6.0), product of:
0.27638784 = queryWeight, product of:
6.572923 = idf(docFreq=167, maxDocs=44218)
0.042049456 = queryNorm
1.2578367 = fieldWeight in 593, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
6.572923 = idf(docFreq=167, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=593)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Abstract
- An influential analysis of text-markup systems and arguments for the use of descriptive markup in machine-readable texts
-
Kashyap, M.M.: Algorithms for analysis and representation of subject contents in a documentary language (1983)
0.07
0.074387826 = product of:
0.2975513 = sum of:
0.2975513 = sum of:
0.11441602 = weight(_text_:language in 1955) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.11441602 = score(doc=1955,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16497234 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9232929 = idf(docFreq=2376, maxDocs=44218)
0.042049456 = queryNorm
0.6935467 = fieldWeight in 1955, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.9232929 = idf(docFreq=2376, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=1955)
0.09198137 = weight(_text_:29 in 1955) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09198137 = score(doc=1955,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14791684 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.042049456 = queryNorm
0.6218451 = fieldWeight in 1955, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=1955)
0.09115393 = weight(_text_:22 in 1955) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09115393 = score(doc=1955,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14725003 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.042049456 = queryNorm
0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 1955, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=1955)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Source
- Library herald. 22(1983), S.1-29
-
Barron, D.: Why use SGML? (1989)
0.05
0.05017906 = product of:
0.20071624 = sum of:
0.20071624 = weight(_text_:markup in 5942) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.20071624 = score(doc=5942,freq=2.0), product of:
0.27638784 = queryWeight, product of:
6.572923 = idf(docFreq=167, maxDocs=44218)
0.042049456 = queryNorm
0.72621226 = fieldWeight in 5942, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
6.572923 = idf(docFreq=167, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5942)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Abstract
- Presents some background information on markup systems, gives a brief account on the SGML and attempts to clarify the precise nature and purpose of SGML, which are widely misunderstood. Explores the reasons why SGML should not be used in preference to older-established systems
-
Furuta, R.: ¬A spectrum of automatic hypertext constructions (1989)
0.05
0.05017906 = product of:
0.20071624 = sum of:
0.20071624 = weight(_text_:markup in 2866) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.20071624 = score(doc=2866,freq=2.0), product of:
0.27638784 = queryWeight, product of:
6.572923 = idf(docFreq=167, maxDocs=44218)
0.042049456 = queryNorm
0.72621226 = fieldWeight in 2866, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
6.572923 = idf(docFreq=167, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2866)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Abstract
- Describes experiences with 4 seperate conversions from paper documents into hypertext and discusses the lessons learned. The paper document's organisation affects the ease with which it can be converted and the appropriateness of the resulting hypertext. The form of the paper document's machine readable 'markup' description affects the ability to transform the structure automatically.
-
Devadason, F.J.: Postulate-Based Permuted Subject Indexing Language as a metalanguage for computer-aided generation of information retrieval thesaurus (1983)
0.04
0.043443393 = product of:
0.17377357 = sum of:
0.17377357 = sum of:
0.10509784 = weight(_text_:language in 1637) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.10509784 = score(doc=1637,freq=12.0), product of:
0.16497234 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9232929 = idf(docFreq=2376, maxDocs=44218)
0.042049456 = queryNorm
0.6370634 = fieldWeight in 1637, product of:
3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
12.0 = termFreq=12.0
3.9232929 = idf(docFreq=2376, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1637)
0.03449301 = weight(_text_:29 in 1637) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03449301 = score(doc=1637,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14791684 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.042049456 = queryNorm
0.23319192 = fieldWeight in 1637, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1637)
0.034182724 = weight(_text_:22 in 1637) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.034182724 = score(doc=1637,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14725003 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.042049456 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1637, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1637)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Abstract
- The development of the general theory of subject indexing language and of POPSI for organisation, storage and retrieval of subjects embodies in documents has a striking parallel in the search for and development of 'universal forms' and 'deep structure' in language and linguistic studies. This paper briefly traces the development of POPSI language as a metalanguage for information organisation and for generating information retrieval thesaurus. Also a computer-based system for generating an information retrieval thesaurus from modulated subject headings formulated according to POPSI which are enriched with certain codes for relating the terms in the subject headings is described. It is also mentioned that, if it is possible to form a table of equivalent terms in another language for the terms already used to generate the thesaurus, then it is possible to translate the thesaurus automatically into the other language
- Source
- International forum on information and documentation. 8(1983), S.22-29
-
Warner, A.J.: Natural language processing (1987)
0.03
0.03426166 = product of:
0.13704664 = sum of:
0.13704664 = product of:
0.20556995 = sum of:
0.11441602 = weight(_text_:language in 337) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.11441602 = score(doc=337,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16497234 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9232929 = idf(docFreq=2376, maxDocs=44218)
0.042049456 = queryNorm
0.6935467 = fieldWeight in 337, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.9232929 = idf(docFreq=2376, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=337)
0.09115393 = weight(_text_:22 in 337) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09115393 = score(doc=337,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14725003 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.042049456 = queryNorm
0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 337, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=337)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Source
- Annual review of information science and technology. 22(1987), S.79-108
-
Chafe, W.L.: Meaning and the structure of language (1980)
0.03
0.032544672 = product of:
0.13017869 = sum of:
0.13017869 = sum of:
0.05005701 = weight(_text_:language in 220) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05005701 = score(doc=220,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16497234 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9232929 = idf(docFreq=2376, maxDocs=44218)
0.042049456 = queryNorm
0.30342668 = fieldWeight in 220, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.9232929 = idf(docFreq=2376, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=220)
0.040241845 = weight(_text_:29 in 220) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.040241845 = score(doc=220,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14791684 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.042049456 = queryNorm
0.27205724 = fieldWeight in 220, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=220)
0.039879844 = weight(_text_:22 in 220) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.039879844 = score(doc=220,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14725003 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.042049456 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 220, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=220)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Date
- 22. 4.2007 12:21:29
-
Kail, R.; Pellegrino, J.: Menschliche Intelligenz (1989)
0.02
0.022891913 = product of:
0.09156765 = sum of:
0.09156765 = product of:
0.13735147 = sum of:
0.06898602 = weight(_text_:29 in 752) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06898602 = score(doc=752,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14791684 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.042049456 = queryNorm
0.46638384 = fieldWeight in 752, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=752)
0.06836545 = weight(_text_:22 in 752) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06836545 = score(doc=752,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14725003 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.042049456 = queryNorm
0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 752, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=752)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Date
- 22. 7.2000 19:29:41
-
Teodorescu, I.: Artificial intelligence and information retrieval (1987)
0.02
0.021499729 = product of:
0.085998915 = sum of:
0.085998915 = product of:
0.12899837 = sum of:
0.07151002 = weight(_text_:language in 542) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07151002 = score(doc=542,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16497234 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9232929 = idf(docFreq=2376, maxDocs=44218)
0.042049456 = queryNorm
0.4334667 = fieldWeight in 542, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.9232929 = idf(docFreq=2376, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=542)
0.057488356 = weight(_text_:29 in 542) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.057488356 = score(doc=542,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14791684 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.042049456 = queryNorm
0.38865322 = fieldWeight in 542, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=542)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Abstract
- Comparing artificial intelligence and information retrieval paradigms for natural language understanding provides a basis for reviewing progress to date. The applicability of artificial intelligence to question-answering systems is outlined. A list of the principal artificial intelligence software for data base front-end systems is appended.
- Source
- Canadian library journal. 44(1987), S.29-32
-
Wenzel, F.: Semantische Eingrenzung im Freitext-Retrieval auf der Basis morphologischer Segmentierungen (1980)
0.02
0.021499729 = product of:
0.085998915 = sum of:
0.085998915 = product of:
0.12899837 = sum of:
0.07151002 = weight(_text_:language in 2037) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07151002 = score(doc=2037,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16497234 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9232929 = idf(docFreq=2376, maxDocs=44218)
0.042049456 = queryNorm
0.4334667 = fieldWeight in 2037, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.9232929 = idf(docFreq=2376, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2037)
0.057488356 = weight(_text_:29 in 2037) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.057488356 = score(doc=2037,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14791684 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.042049456 = queryNorm
0.38865322 = fieldWeight in 2037, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2037)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Abstract
- The basic problem in freetext retrieval is that the retrieval language is not properly adapted to that of the author. Morphological segmentation, where words with the same root are grouped together in the inverted file, is a good eliminator of noise and information loss, providing high recall but low precision
- Source
- Nachrichten für Dokumentation. 31(1980) H.1, S.29-35
-
Rau, L.F.: Conceptual information extraction and retrieval from natural language input (198)
0.02
0.021499729 = product of:
0.085998915 = sum of:
0.085998915 = product of:
0.12899837 = sum of:
0.07151002 = weight(_text_:language in 1955) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07151002 = score(doc=1955,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16497234 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9232929 = idf(docFreq=2376, maxDocs=44218)
0.042049456 = queryNorm
0.4334667 = fieldWeight in 1955, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.9232929 = idf(docFreq=2376, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1955)
0.057488356 = weight(_text_:29 in 1955) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.057488356 = score(doc=1955,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14791684 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.042049456 = queryNorm
0.38865322 = fieldWeight in 1955, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1955)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Date
- 16. 8.1998 13:29:20
-
Shatford, S.: Analyzing the subject of a picture : a theoretical approach (1986)
0.02
0.018505525 = product of:
0.0740221 = sum of:
0.0740221 = product of:
0.11103315 = sum of:
0.070791304 = weight(_text_:language in 354) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.070791304 = score(doc=354,freq=4.0), product of:
0.16497234 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9232929 = idf(docFreq=2376, maxDocs=44218)
0.042049456 = queryNorm
0.42911017 = fieldWeight in 354, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.9232929 = idf(docFreq=2376, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=354)
0.040241845 = weight(_text_:29 in 354) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.040241845 = score(doc=354,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14791684 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.042049456 = queryNorm
0.27205724 = fieldWeight in 354, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=354)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Abstract
- This paper suggests a theoretical basis for identifying and classifying the kinds of subjects a picture may have, using previously developed principles of cataloging and classification, and concepts taken from the philosophy of art, from meaning in language, and from visual perception. The purpose of developing this theoretical basis is to provide the reader with a means for evaluating, adapting, and applying presently existing indexing languages, or for devising new languages for pictorial materials; this paper does not attempt to invent or prescribe a particular indexing language.
- Date
- 7. 1.2007 13:00:29
-
Rolland-Thomas, P.: AACR2: one step towards an international code (1983)
0.02
0.01713083 = product of:
0.06852332 = sum of:
0.06852332 = product of:
0.10278498 = sum of:
0.05720801 = weight(_text_:language in 310) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05720801 = score(doc=310,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16497234 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9232929 = idf(docFreq=2376, maxDocs=44218)
0.042049456 = queryNorm
0.34677336 = fieldWeight in 310, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.9232929 = idf(docFreq=2376, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=310)
0.045576964 = weight(_text_:22 in 310) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.045576964 = score(doc=310,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14725003 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.042049456 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 310, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=310)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Abstract
- The Anglo-American Cataloguing Rules, second edition, aim at universal applicability. Some problems brought forth through the translation process and the laws in the workability of rules in a nonEnglish working language are examined. This leads to acknowledge the failure of AACR2 to acquire an international adaptability. Enquiry into the needs of potential users is advised.
- Date
- 6. 1.2007 19:12:22
-
Schwarz, C.: THESYS: Thesaurus Syntax System : a fully automatic thesaurus building aid (1988)
0.01
0.014989476 = product of:
0.059957903 = sum of:
0.059957903 = product of:
0.08993685 = sum of:
0.05005701 = weight(_text_:language in 1361) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05005701 = score(doc=1361,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16497234 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9232929 = idf(docFreq=2376, maxDocs=44218)
0.042049456 = queryNorm
0.30342668 = fieldWeight in 1361, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.9232929 = idf(docFreq=2376, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1361)
0.039879844 = weight(_text_:22 in 1361) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.039879844 = score(doc=1361,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14725003 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.042049456 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 1361, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1361)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Abstract
- THESYS is based on the natural language processing of free-text databases. It yields statistically evaluated correlations between words of the database. These correlations correspond to traditional thesaurus relations. The person who has to build a thesaurus is thus assisted by the proposals made by THESYS. THESYS is being tested on commercial databases under real world conditions. It is part of a text processing project at Siemens, called TINA (Text-Inhalts-Analyse). Software from TINA is actually being applied and evaluated by the US Department of Commerce for patent search and indexing (REALIST: REtrieval Aids by Linguistics and STatistics)
- Date
- 6. 1.1999 10:22:07
-
Dack, D.: Australian attends conference on Dewey (1989)
0.01
0.014989476 = product of:
0.059957903 = sum of:
0.059957903 = product of:
0.08993685 = sum of:
0.05005701 = weight(_text_:language in 2509) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05005701 = score(doc=2509,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16497234 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9232929 = idf(docFreq=2376, maxDocs=44218)
0.042049456 = queryNorm
0.30342668 = fieldWeight in 2509, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.9232929 = idf(docFreq=2376, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2509)
0.039879844 = weight(_text_:22 in 2509) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.039879844 = score(doc=2509,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14725003 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.042049456 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2509, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2509)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Abstract
- Edited version of a report to the Australian Library and Information Association on the Conference on classification theory in the computer age, Albany, New York, 18-19 Nov 88, and on the meeting of the Dewey Editorial Policy Committee which preceded it. The focus of the Editorial Policy Committee Meeting lay in the following areas: browsing; potential for improved subject access; system design; potential conflict between shelf location and information retrieval; and users. At the Conference on classification theory in the computer age the following papers were presented: Applications of artificial intelligence to bibliographic classification, by Irene Travis; Automation and classification, By Elaine Svenonious; Subject classification and language processing for retrieval in large data bases, by Diana Scott; Implications for information processing, by Carol Mandel; and implications for information science education, by Richard Halsey.
- Date
- 8.11.1995 11:52:22
-
Hodges, P.R.: Keyword in title indexes : effectiveness of retrieval in computer searches (1983)
0.01
0.014989476 = product of:
0.059957903 = sum of:
0.059957903 = product of:
0.08993685 = sum of:
0.05005701 = weight(_text_:language in 5001) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05005701 = score(doc=5001,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16497234 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9232929 = idf(docFreq=2376, maxDocs=44218)
0.042049456 = queryNorm
0.30342668 = fieldWeight in 5001, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.9232929 = idf(docFreq=2376, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5001)
0.039879844 = weight(_text_:22 in 5001) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.039879844 = score(doc=5001,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14725003 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.042049456 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 5001, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5001)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Abstract
- A study was done to test the effectiveness of retrieval using title word searching. It was based on actual search profiles used in the Mechanized Information Center at Ohio State University, in order ro replicate as closely as possible actual searching conditions. Fewer than 50% of the relevant titles were retrieved by keywords in titles. The low rate of retrieval can be attributes to three sources: titles themselves, user and information specialist ignorance of the subject vocabulary in use, and to general language problems. Across fields it was found that the social sciences had the best retrieval rate, with science having the next best, and arts and humanities the lowest. Ways to enhance and supplement keyword in title searching on the computer and in printed indexes are discussed.
- Date
- 14. 3.1996 13:22:21
