Search (4163 results, page 1 of 209)

  1. Zeng, Q.; Yu, M.; Yu, W.; Xiong, J.; Shi, Y.; Jiang, M.: Faceted hierarchy : a new graph type to organize scientific concepts and a construction method (2019) 0.15 
    0.15271163 = product of:
  0.38177907 = sum of:
    0.2736665 = weight(_text_:3a in 400) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.2736665 = score(doc=400,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.48693544 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.057435103 = queryNorm
        0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 400, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=400)
    0.10811258 = weight(_text_:link in 400) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.10811258 = score(doc=400,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.30605444 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.3287 = idf(docFreq=582, maxDocs=44218)
          0.057435103 = queryNorm
        0.35324624 = fieldWeight in 400, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.3287 = idf(docFreq=582, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=400)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Abstract
    On a scientific concept hierarchy, a parent concept may have a few attributes, each of which has multiple values being a group of child concepts. We call these attributes facets: classification has a few facets such as application (e.g., face recognition), model (e.g., svm, knn), and metric (e.g., precision). In this work, we aim at building faceted concept hierarchies from scientific literature. Hierarchy construction methods heavily rely on hypernym detection, however, the faceted relations are parent-to-child links but the hypernym relation is a multi-hop, i.e., ancestor-to-descendent link with a specific facet "type-of". We use information extraction techniques to find synonyms, sibling concepts, and ancestor-descendent relations from a data science corpus. And we propose a hierarchy growth algorithm to infer the parent-child links from the three types of relationships. It resolves conflicts by maintaining the acyclic structure of a hierarchy.
    Content
    Vgl.: https%3A%2F%2Faclanthology.org%2FD19-5317.pdf&usg=AOvVaw0ZZFyq5wWTtNTvNkrvjlGA.
  2. Hotho, A.; Bloehdorn, S.: Data Mining 2004 : Text classification by boosting weak learners based on terms and concepts (2004) 0.13 
    0.1281426 = product of:
  0.3203565 = sum of:
    0.2736665 = weight(_text_:3a in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.2736665 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.48693544 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.057435103 = queryNorm
        0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
    0.04668998 = weight(_text_:22 in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.04668998 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.20112795 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.057435103 = queryNorm
        0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Content
    Vgl.: http://www.google.de/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&ved=0CEAQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fciteseerx.ist.psu.edu%2Fviewdoc%2Fdownload%3Fdoi%3D10.1.1.91.4940%26rep%3Drep1%26type%3Dpdf&ei=dOXrUMeIDYHDtQahsIGACg&usg=AFQjCNHFWVh6gNPvnOrOS9R3rkrXCNVD-A&sig2=5I2F5evRfMnsttSgFF9g7Q&bvm=bv.1357316858,d.Yms.
    Date
    8. 1.2013 10:22:32
  3. Knauth, M.: Bibliographies made easy : a look at PRO-CITE (1989) 0.12 
    0.12477145 = product of:
  0.31192863 = sum of:
    0.24967533 = weight(_text_:link in 2830) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.24967533 = score(doc=2830,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.30605444 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.3287 = idf(docFreq=582, maxDocs=44218)
          0.057435103 = queryNorm
        0.8157873 = fieldWeight in 2830, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          5.3287 = idf(docFreq=582, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2830)
    0.062253308 = weight(_text_:22 in 2830) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.062253308 = score(doc=2830,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.20112795 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.057435103 = queryNorm
        0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2830, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2830)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Abstract
    The PRO-CITE and BIBLIO-LINK software packages make the process of compiling bibliographies and internal data bases much easier than when all the steps in the process were manual (compiling, typing). The 2 programs work on records that have been downloaded from on-line data bases. BIBLIO-LINK analyses the downloaded records to determine document type and stores the data in the appropriate PRO-CITE workform, putting fields from the downloaded record into the correct PRO-CITE fields.
    Object
    BIBLIO-LINK
    Source
    Computers in libraries. 9(1989) no.4, S.22-24
  4. Zitt, M.: Meso-level retrieval : IR-bibliometrics interplay and hybrid citation-words methods in scientific fields delineation (2015) 0.12 
    0.117390215 = product of:
  0.5869511 = sum of:
    0.5869511 = weight(_text_:2223 in 1692) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.5869511 = score(doc=1692,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.552379 = queryWeight, product of:
          9.617446 = idf(docFreq=7, maxDocs=44218)
          0.057435103 = queryNorm
        1.0625876 = fieldWeight in 1692, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          9.617446 = idf(docFreq=7, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1692)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Source
    Scientometrics. 102(2015) no.3, S.2223-2245
  5. Verwer, K.: Freiheit und Verantwortung bei Hans Jonas (2011) 0.11 
    0.109466605 = product of:
  0.547333 = sum of:
    0.547333 = weight(_text_:3a in 973) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.547333 = score(doc=973,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.48693544 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.057435103 = queryNorm
        1.1240361 = fieldWeight in 973, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=973)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Content
    Vgl.: http%3A%2F%2Fcreativechoice.org%2Fdoc%2FHansJonas.pdf&usg=AOvVaw1TM3teaYKgABL5H9yoIifA&opi=89978449.
  6. Fachsystematik Bremen nebst Schlüssel 1970 ff. (1970 ff) 0.11 
    0.10678549 = product of:
  0.26696372 = sum of:
    0.22805542 = weight(_text_:3a in 3577) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.22805542 = score(doc=3577,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.48693544 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.057435103 = queryNorm
        0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 3577, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3577)
    0.038908318 = weight(_text_:22 in 3577) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.038908318 = score(doc=3577,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.20112795 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.057435103 = queryNorm
        0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 3577, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3577)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Content
    1. Agrarwissenschaften 1981. - 3. Allgemeine Geographie 2.1972. - 3a. Allgemeine Naturwissenschaften 1.1973. - 4. Allgemeine Sprachwissenschaft, Allgemeine Literaturwissenschaft 2.1971. - 6. Allgemeines. 5.1983. - 7. Anglistik 3.1976. - 8. Astronomie, Geodäsie 4.1977. - 12. bio Biologie, bcp Biochemie-Biophysik, bot Botanik, zoo Zoologie 1981. - 13. Bremensien 3.1983. - 13a. Buch- und Bibliothekswesen 3.1975. - 14. Chemie 4.1977. - 14a. Elektrotechnik 1974. - 15 Ethnologie 2.1976. - 16,1. Geowissenschaften. Sachteil 3.1977. - 16,2. Geowissenschaften. Regionaler Teil 3.1977. - 17. Germanistik 6.1984. - 17a,1. Geschichte. Teilsystematik hil. - 17a,2. Geschichte. Teilsystematik his Neuere Geschichte. - 17a,3. Geschichte. Teilsystematik hit Neueste Geschichte. - 18. Humanbiologie 2.1983. - 19. Ingenieurwissenschaften 1974. - 20. siehe 14a. - 21. klassische Philologie 3.1977. - 22. Klinische Medizin 1975. - 23. Kunstgeschichte 2.1971. - 24. Kybernetik. 2.1975. - 25. Mathematik 3.1974. - 26. Medizin 1976. - 26a. Militärwissenschaft 1985. - 27. Musikwissenschaft 1978. - 27a. Noten 2.1974. - 28. Ozeanographie 3.1977. -29. Pädagogik 8.1985. - 30. Philosphie 3.1974. - 31. Physik 3.1974. - 33. Politik, Politische Wissenschaft, Sozialwissenschaft. Soziologie. Länderschlüssel. Register 1981. - 34. Psychologie 2.1972. - 35. Publizistik und Kommunikationswissenschaft 1985. - 36. Rechtswissenschaften 1986. - 37. Regionale Geograpgie 3.1975. - 37a. Religionswissenschaft 1970. - 38. Romanistik 3.1976. - 39. Skandinavistik 4.1985. - 40. Slavistik 1977. - 40a. Sonstige Sprachen und Literaturen 1973. - 43. Sport 4.1983. - 44. Theaterwissenschaft 1985. - 45. Theologie 2.1976. - 45a. Ur- und Frühgeschichte, Archäologie 1970. - 47. Volkskunde 1976. - 47a. Wirtschaftswissenschaften 1971 // Schlüssel: 1. Länderschlüssel 1971. - 2. Formenschlüssel (Kurzform) 1974. - 3. Personenschlüssel Literatur 5. Fassung 1968
  7. Jascó, P.: General encyclopedias on CD-ROM : a look at the 1995 editions (1995) 0.10 
    0.10320171 = product of:
  0.25800428 = sum of:
    0.18018764 = weight(_text_:link in 2805) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.18018764 = score(doc=2805,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.30605444 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.3287 = idf(docFreq=582, maxDocs=44218)
          0.057435103 = queryNorm
        0.58874375 = fieldWeight in 2805, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.3287 = idf(docFreq=582, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2805)
    0.077816635 = weight(_text_:22 in 2805) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.077816635 = score(doc=2805,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.20112795 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.057435103 = queryNorm
        0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 2805, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2805)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Source
    Link-up. 12(1995) no.3, S.20-22
  8. Landry, P.: MACS: multilingual access to subject and link management : Extending the Multilingual Capacity of TEL in the EDL Project (2007) 0.10 
    0.10320171 = product of:
  0.25800428 = sum of:
    0.18018764 = weight(_text_:link in 1287) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.18018764 = score(doc=1287,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.30605444 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.3287 = idf(docFreq=582, maxDocs=44218)
          0.057435103 = queryNorm
        0.58874375 = fieldWeight in 1287, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.3287 = idf(docFreq=582, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1287)
    0.077816635 = weight(_text_:22 in 1287) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.077816635 = score(doc=1287,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.20112795 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.057435103 = queryNorm
        0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 1287, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1287)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Content
    Vortrag anlässlich des Workshops: "Extending the multilingual capacity of The European Library in the EDL project Stockholm, Swedish National Library, 22-23 November 2007".
  9. Burgin, R.: ¬The retrieval effectiveness of 5 clustering algorithms as a function of indexing exhaustivity (1995) 0.10 
    0.0961457 = product of:
  0.24036424 = sum of:
    0.20145592 = weight(_text_:link in 3365) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.20145592 = score(doc=3365,freq=10.0), product of:
        0.30605444 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.3287 = idf(docFreq=582, maxDocs=44218)
          0.057435103 = queryNorm
        0.65823555 = fieldWeight in 3365, product of:
          3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
            10.0 = termFreq=10.0
          5.3287 = idf(docFreq=582, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3365)
    0.038908318 = weight(_text_:22 in 3365) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.038908318 = score(doc=3365,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.20112795 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.057435103 = queryNorm
        0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 3365, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3365)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Abstract
    The retrieval effectiveness of 5 hierarchical clustering methods (single link, complete link, group average, Ward's method, and weighted average) is examined as a function of indexing exhaustivity with 4 test collections (CR, Cranfield, Medlars, and Time). Evaluations of retrieval effectiveness, based on 3 measures of optimal retrieval performance, confirm earlier findings that the performance of a retrieval system based on single link clustering varies as a function of indexing exhaustivity but fail ti find similar patterns for other clustering methods. The data also confirm earlier findings regarding the poor performance of single link clustering is a retrieval environment. The poor performance of single link clustering appears to derive from that method's tendency to produce a small number of large, ill defined document clusters. By contrast, the data examined here found the retrieval performance of the other clustering methods to be general comparable. The data presented also provides an opportunity to examine the theoretical limits of cluster based retrieval and to compare these theoretical limits to the effectiveness of operational implementations. Performance standards of the 4 document collections examined were found to vary widely, and the effectiveness of operational implementations were found to be in the range defined as unacceptable. Further improvements in search strategies and document representations warrant investigations
    Date
    22. 2.1996 11:20:06
  10. Bruce, H.: ¬The user's view of the Internet (2002) 0.10 
    0.09547043 = product of:
  0.15911737 = sum of:
    0.09338859 = weight(_text_:object's in 4344) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.09338859 = score(doc=4344,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.568902 = queryWeight, product of:
          9.905128 = idf(docFreq=5, maxDocs=44218)
          0.057435103 = queryNorm
        0.16415584 = fieldWeight in 4344, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          9.905128 = idf(docFreq=5, maxDocs=44218)
          0.01171875 = fieldNorm(doc=4344)
    0.05405629 = weight(_text_:link in 4344) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.05405629 = score(doc=4344,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.30605444 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.3287 = idf(docFreq=582, maxDocs=44218)
          0.057435103 = queryNorm
        0.17662312 = fieldWeight in 4344, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          5.3287 = idf(docFreq=582, maxDocs=44218)
          0.01171875 = fieldNorm(doc=4344)
    0.011672495 = weight(_text_:22 in 4344) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.011672495 = score(doc=4344,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.20112795 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.057435103 = queryNorm
        0.058035173 = fieldWeight in 4344, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.01171875 = fieldNorm(doc=4344)
  0.6 = coord(3/5)
    Footnote
    Chapter 2 (Technology and People) focuses an several theories of technological acceptance and diffusion. Unfortunately, Bruce's presentation is somewhat confusing as he moves from one theory to next, never quite connecting them into a logical sequence or coherent whole. Two theories are of particular interest to Bruce: the Theory of Diffusion of Innovations and the Theory of Planned Behavior. The Theory of Diffusion of Innovations is an "information-centric view of technology acceptance" in which technology adopters are placed in the information flows of society from which they learn about innovations and "drive innovation adoption decisions" (p. 20). The Theory of Planned Behavior maintains that the "performance of a behavior is a joint function of intentions and perceived behavioral control" (i.e., how muck control a person thinks they have) (pp. 22-23). Bruce combines these two theories to form the basis for the Technology Acceptance Model. This model posits that "an individual's acceptance of information technology is based an beliefs, attitudes, intentions, and behaviors" (p. 24). In all these theories and models echoes a recurring theme: "individual perceptions of the innovation or technology are critical" in terms of both its characteristics and its use (pp. 24-25). From these, in turn, Bruce derives a predictive theory of the role personal perceptions play in technology adoption: Personal Innovativeness of Information Technology Adoption (PIITA). Personal inventiveness is defined as "the willingness of an individual to try out any new information technology" (p. 26). In general, the PIITA theory predicts that information technology will be adopted by individuals that have a greater exposure to mass media, rely less an the evaluation of information technology by others, exhibit a greater ability to cope with uncertainty and take risks, and requires a less positive perception of an information technology prior to its adoption. Chapter 3 (A Focus an Usings) introduces the User-Centered Paradigm (UCP). The UCP is characteristic of the shift of emphasis from technology to users as the driving force behind technology and research agendas for Internet development [for a dissenting view, see Andrew Dillion's (2003) challenge to the utility of user-centerness for design guidance]. It entails the "broad acceptance of the user-oriented perspective across a range of disciplines and professional fields," such as business, education, cognitive engineering, and information science (p. 34).
    The UCP's effect an business practices is focused mainly in the management and marketing areas. Marketing experienced a shift from "product-oriented operations" with its focus an "selling the products' features" and customer contact only at the point of sale toward more service-Centered business practice ("customer Jemand orientation") and the development of one-to-one customer relationships (pp. 35-36). For management, the adoption of the UCP caused a shift from "mechanistic, bureaucratic, top-down organizational structures" to "flatter, inclusive, and participative" ones (p. 37). In education, practice shifted from the teachercentered model where the "teacher is responsible for and makes all the decisions related to the learning environment" to a learnercentered model where the student is "responsible for his or her own learning" and the teacher focuses an "matching learning events to the individual skills, aptitudes, and interests of the individual learner" (pp. 38-39). Cognitive engineering saw the rise of "user-Centered design" and human factors that were concerned with applying "scientific knowledge of humans to the design of man-machine interface systems" (p. 44). The UCP had a great effect an Information Science in the "design of information systems" (p. 47). Previous to UCP's explicit proposed by Brenda Dervin and M. Nilan in 1986, systems design was dominated by the "physical of system oriented paradigm" (p. 48). The physical paradigm held a positivistic and materialistic view of technology and (passive) human interaction as exemplified by the 1953 Cranfield tests of information retrieval mechanisms. Instead, the UCP focuses an "users rather than systems" by making the perceptions of individual information users the "centerpiece consideration for information service and system design" (pp. 47-48). Bruce briefly touches an the various schools of thought within user-oriented paradigm, such as the cognitive/self studies approach with its emphasis is an an individual's knowledge structures or model of the world [e.g., Belkin (1990)], the cognitve/context studies approach that focuses an "context in explaining variations in information behavior" [e.g., Savolainen (1995) and Dervin's (1999) sensemaking], and the social constructionism/discourse analytic theory with its focus an that language, not mental/knowledge constructs, as the primary shaper of the world as a system of intersubjective meanings [e.g., Talja 1996], (pp. 53-54). Drawing from the rich tradition of user oriented research, Bruce attempts to gain a metatheoretical understanding of the Internet as a phenomena by combining Dervin's (1996) "micromoments of human usings" with the French philosopher Bruno Latour's (1999) "conception of Circulating reference" to form what 1 term the Metatheory of Circulating Usings (pp. ix, 56, 60). According to Bruce, Latour's concept is designed to bridge "the gap between mind and object" by engaging in a "succession of finely grained transformations that construct and transfer truth about the object" through a chain of "microtranslations" from "matter to form," thereby connecting mind and object (p. 56). The connection works as long as the chain remains unbroken. The nature of this chain of "information producing translations" are such that as one moves away from the object, one experiences a "reduction" of the object's "locality, particularity, materiality, multiplicity and continuity," while simultaneously gaining the "amplification" of its "compatibility, standardization, text, calculation, circulation, and relative universality" (p. 57).
    Bruce begins Chapter 5 (The Users' View of the Internet) by pointing out that the Internet not only exists as a physical entity of hardware, software, and networked connectivity, but also as a mental representation or knowledge structure constructed by users based an their usings. These knowledge structures or constructs "allow people to interpret and make sense of things" by functioning as a link between the new unknown thing with known thing(s) (p. 158). The knowledge structures or using constructs are continually evolving as people use the Internet over time, and represent the user's view of the Internet. To capture the users' view of the Internet from the research literature, Bruce uses his Metatheory of Circulating Usings. He recapitulates the theory, casting it more closely to the study of Internet use than previously. Here the reduction component provides a more detailed "understanding of the individual users involved in the micromoment of Internet using" while simultaneously the amplification component increases our understanding of the "generalized construct of the Internet" (p. 158). From this point an Bruce presents a relatively detail users' view of the Internet. He starts with examining Internet usings, which is composed of three parts: using space, using literacies, and Internet space. According to Bruce, using space is a using horizon likened to a "sphere of influence," comfortable and intimate, in which an individual interacts with the Internet successfully (p. 164). It is a "composite of individual (professional nonwork) constructs of Internet utility" (p. 165). Using literacies are the groups of skills or tools that an individual must acquire for successful interaction with the Internet. These literacies serve to link the using space with the Internet space. They are usually self-taught and form individual standards of successful or satisfactory usings that can be (and often are) at odds with the standards of the information profession. Internet space is, according to Bruce, a user construct that perceives the Internet as a physical, tangible place separate from using space. Bruce concludes that the user's view of the Internet explains six "principles" (p. 173). "Internet using is proof of concept" and occurs in contexts; using space is created through using frequency, individuals use literacies to explore and utilize Internet space, Internet space "does not require proof of concept, and is often influence by the perceptions and usings of others," and "the user's view of the Internet is upbeat and optimistic" (pp. 173-175). He ends with a section describing who are the Internet stakeholders. Bruce defines them as Internet hardware/software developers, Professional users practicing their profession in both familiar and transformational ways, and individuals using the Internet "for the tasks and pleasures of everyday life" (p. 176).
    This book suffers from two major shortcomings: the failure to explain how the metatheory is actually used to analyze extant research data, and the failure to explicitly link the data presented to the conclusions drawn. The analytical function of Bruce's metatheory is clearly stated, but no explicit explanation or example is given to show how he actually accomplished this analysis. Granted, it is impractical given the volume of research data involved, to show how every bit of the data in Chapter 4 was derived. However, several examples of how the metatheory was applied would have been useful in understanding its actual function in the study at hand as well as its potential utility any future studies. More serious is the lack of explicit linkage between the data summary presented in Chapter 4 and the conclusions given in Chapter 5. Each chapter is presented as stand-alone entities containing no citations or internal referencing to connect the data with the conclusions. This leaves the readers with no ready means to evaluate the concluding construct of the user's view of the Internet in light of the data from which it was ostensibly derived. The readers must either go back and laboriously construct the connections themselves, or just take the author's word for it. Because the goal of the book is to create a convincing construct of the user's view of the Internet for others to understand, follow, apply, and improve upon in the "next generation of Internet development," the burden of proof is an the author, not the readers (pp. ix, 183). This oversight may not be so crucial if the author were presenting an exploratory essay designed primarily to stimulate thought and expand our perceptions. However, given that the book is intended as a scholarly work (otherwise why the tremendous effort in analyzing and summarizing vast quantities of research data in Chapter 4?), the lack of explicit linkage between the data and the conclusion is not only puzzling, but simply unacceptable. In summary then, the book is strong in its theoretical and metatheoretical development, presentation of the research data and scope of the literature review, and clarity of the concluding construct of the user's view of the Internet. If these items are of particular interest to the you, then this book may be worth your while. Otherwise, the failure of the book to provide an explanation of how the Metatheory of Circulating Usings is applied in analyzing extant research data, coupled with book's failure to link explicitly the data presented with the conclusions severely undermines this reviewer's confidence in the author's conclusions."
  11. Horikoshi, K.; Sugita, S.; Nonaka, Y.; Kamiya, S.; Sugita, I.; Asoshina, H.: junii2 and AIRway : an application profile for scholarly works and its application for link resolvers (2008) 0.09 
    0.09399428 = product of:
  0.2349857 = sum of:
    0.20385905 = weight(_text_:link in 2663) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.20385905 = score(doc=2663,freq=16.0), product of:
        0.30605444 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.3287 = idf(docFreq=582, maxDocs=44218)
          0.057435103 = queryNorm
        0.6660875 = fieldWeight in 2663, product of:
          4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
            16.0 = termFreq=16.0
          5.3287 = idf(docFreq=582, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2663)
    0.031126654 = weight(_text_:22 in 2663) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.031126654 = score(doc=2663,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.20112795 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.057435103 = queryNorm
        0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 2663, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2663)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Abstract
    A large number of scholarly works is self-archived at the university's Open Access repositories. Researchers can search these materials using general web search engines such as Google, as well as with OAI-PMH-based search engines such as OAIster (http://www.oaister.org/). The archives can also be accessed using federated search services such as MetaLib by setting the repositories as a search target. However, it remains difficult for researchers to access materials in these repositories using standard academic databases such as Thomson Reuters' Web of Science. The National Institute of Informatics (NII) in Japan has developed a DC application profile called junii2 (http://ju.nii.ac.jp/oai/junii2.xsd) for scholarly works. The AIRway Project (Access path to Institutional Resources via link resolvers) has used this profile to develop a new way of connecting university repositories with academic databases via link resolvers. junii2 is designed as an OpenURL-compliant schema (info:ofi/fmt:xml:xsd:journal), and has now been widely adopted by more than 70 university repositories in Japan. A particular feature is its ability to describe variant self-archived materials with a version description function (specifying whether it is an author's draft or the final published version) and information on the availability of the full text in the repository. AIRway is an internet server that harvests metadata from university repositories. After harvesting metadata, AIRway separates the metadata of materials whose full texts are available in the repositories from others. A link resolver sends an OpenURL request to the AIRway server before creating its navigation window. If metadata of the requested material are found in the AIRway server and the material's full text is available in a repository, the AIRway server provides the xml for the metadata of the material to the link resolver. Rather than being a new service system for end users, it is a back-end knowledgebase for existing link resolvers. 1CATE (OCLC's link resolver) and some installations of SFX (Ex Libris' link resolver) now use AIRway as one of their knowledgebases. In this way, junii2 and AIRway make Open Access scholarly works in university repositories accessible through general academic databases. This will be particularly effective if, for example, someone without a license to access an electronic journal finds a research paper on the journal in the search results of an academic database. The AIRway Project is funded by the NII Institutional Repositories Program (http://www.nii.ac.jp/irp/en/).
    Source
    Metadata for semantic and social applications : proceedings of the International Conference on Dublin Core and Metadata Applications, Berlin, 22 - 26 September 2008, DC 2008: Berlin, Germany / ed. by Jane Greenberg and Wolfgang Klas
  12. Kleineberg, M.: Context analysis and context indexing : formal pragmatics in knowledge organization (2014) 0.09 
    0.09122217 = product of:
  0.45611084 = sum of:
    0.45611084 = weight(_text_:3a in 1826) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.45611084 = score(doc=1826,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.48693544 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.057435103 = queryNorm
        0.93669677 = fieldWeight in 1826, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1826)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Source
    http://www.google.de/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=5&ved=0CDQQFjAE&url=http%3A%2F%2Fdigbib.ubka.uni-karlsruhe.de%2Fvolltexte%2Fdocuments%2F3131107&ei=HzFWVYvGMsiNsgGTyoFI&usg=AFQjCNE2FHUeR9oQTQlNC4TPedv4Mo3DaQ&sig2=Rlzpr7a3BLZZkqZCXXN_IA&bvm=bv.93564037,d.bGg&cad=rja
  13. Baeza-Yates, R.; Boldi, P.; Castillo, C.: Generalizing PageRank : damping functions for linkbased ranking algorithms (2006) 0.09 
    0.087638386 = product of:
  0.21909596 = sum of:
    0.18018764 = weight(_text_:link in 2565) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.18018764 = score(doc=2565,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.30605444 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.3287 = idf(docFreq=582, maxDocs=44218)
          0.057435103 = queryNorm
        0.58874375 = fieldWeight in 2565, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          5.3287 = idf(docFreq=582, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2565)
    0.038908318 = weight(_text_:22 in 2565) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.038908318 = score(doc=2565,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.20112795 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.057435103 = queryNorm
        0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2565, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2565)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Abstract
    This paper introduces a family of link-based ranking algorithms that propagate page importance through links. In these algorithms there is a damping function that decreases with distance, so a direct link implies more endorsement than a link through a long path. PageRank is the most widely known ranking function of this family. The main objective of this paper is to determine whether this family of ranking techniques has some interest per se, and how different choices for the damping function impact on rank quality and on convergence speed. Even though our results suggest that PageRank can be approximated with other simpler forms of rankings that may be computed more efficiently, our focus is of more speculative nature, in that it aims at separating the kernel of PageRank, that is, link-based importance propagation, from the way propagation decays over paths. We focus on three damping functions, having linear, exponential, and hyperbolic decay on the lengths of the paths. The exponential decay corresponds to PageRank, and the other functions are new. Our presentation includes algorithms, analysis, comparisons and experiments that study their behavior under different parameters in real Web graph data. Among other results, we show how to calculate a linear approximation that induces a page ordering that is almost identical to PageRank's using a fixed small number of iterations; comparisons were performed using Kendall's tau on large domain datasets.
    Date
    16. 1.2016 10:22:28
  14. Mari, H.: Dos fundamentos da significao a producao do sentido (1996) 0.09 
    0.08716269 = product of:
  0.43581343 = sum of:
    0.43581343 = weight(_text_:object's in 819) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.43581343 = score(doc=819,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.568902 = queryWeight, product of:
          9.905128 = idf(docFreq=5, maxDocs=44218)
          0.057435103 = queryNorm
        0.7660606 = fieldWeight in 819, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          9.905128 = idf(docFreq=5, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=819)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Abstract
    An approach to establishing a relationship between knowing, informing and representing, using aspects of linguistic theory to clarify semantic theory as the basis for an overall theory of meaning. Linguistic knowledge is based on a conceptual matrix which defines convergence / divergence of the categories used to specify an object's parameters; work on the analysis of discourse emphasisis the social dimension of meaning, which is the basis of the theory of acts and speech. The evaluation criteria used to determine questions about the possibility of knowledge are necessarily decisive, this opens up promising perspectives if formulating a relationship between conceptual and pragmatic approaches
  15. Conhaim, W.W.: Search tools (1996) 0.08 
    0.082561366 = product of:
  0.20640342 = sum of:
    0.14415011 = weight(_text_:link in 4738) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.14415011 = score(doc=4738,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.30605444 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.3287 = idf(docFreq=582, maxDocs=44218)
          0.057435103 = queryNorm
        0.47099498 = fieldWeight in 4738, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.3287 = idf(docFreq=582, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4738)
    0.062253308 = weight(_text_:22 in 4738) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.062253308 = score(doc=4738,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.20112795 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.057435103 = queryNorm
        0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4738, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4738)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Date
    1. 8.1996 22:39:31
    Source
    Link-up. 13(1996) no.1, S.5,40-41
  16. Fewtrell, B.: audio description : Accessing visual media (1997) 0.08 
    0.082561366 = product of:
  0.20640342 = sum of:
    0.14415011 = weight(_text_:link in 403) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.14415011 = score(doc=403,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.30605444 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.3287 = idf(docFreq=582, maxDocs=44218)
          0.057435103 = queryNorm
        0.47099498 = fieldWeight in 403, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.3287 = idf(docFreq=582, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=403)
    0.062253308 = weight(_text_:22 in 403) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.062253308 = score(doc=403,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.20112795 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.057435103 = queryNorm
        0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 403, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=403)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Source
    Link-up. 14(1997) no.2, S.22
  17. Bourne, R.: MARC harmonization : progress and problems (1997) 0.08 
    0.082561366 = product of:
  0.20640342 = sum of:
    0.14415011 = weight(_text_:link in 873) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.14415011 = score(doc=873,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.30605444 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.3287 = idf(docFreq=582, maxDocs=44218)
          0.057435103 = queryNorm
        0.47099498 = fieldWeight in 873, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.3287 = idf(docFreq=582, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=873)
    0.062253308 = weight(_text_:22 in 873) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.062253308 = score(doc=873,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.20112795 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.057435103 = queryNorm
        0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 873, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=873)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Source
    LASER link. 1997, Spring/Summer, S.22-24
  18. Spertus, E.: ParaSite : mining structural information on the Web (1997) 0.08 
    0.082561366 = product of:
  0.20640342 = sum of:
    0.14415011 = weight(_text_:link in 2740) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.14415011 = score(doc=2740,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.30605444 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.3287 = idf(docFreq=582, maxDocs=44218)
          0.057435103 = queryNorm
        0.47099498 = fieldWeight in 2740, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.3287 = idf(docFreq=582, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2740)
    0.062253308 = weight(_text_:22 in 2740) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.062253308 = score(doc=2740,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.20112795 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.057435103 = queryNorm
        0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2740, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2740)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Abstract
    Discusses the varieties of link information on the WWW, how the Web differs from conventional hypertext, and how the links can be exploited to build useful applications. Specific applications presented as part of the ParaSite system find individuals' homepages, new locations of moved pages and unindexed information
    Date
    1. 8.1996 22:08:06
  19. Wesch, M.: Web 2.0 ... The Machine is Us/ing Us (2006) 0.08 
    0.082561366 = product of:
  0.20640342 = sum of:
    0.14415011 = weight(_text_:link in 3478) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.14415011 = score(doc=3478,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.30605444 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.3287 = idf(docFreq=582, maxDocs=44218)
          0.057435103 = queryNorm
        0.47099498 = fieldWeight in 3478, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.3287 = idf(docFreq=582, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3478)
    0.062253308 = weight(_text_:22 in 3478) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.062253308 = score(doc=3478,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.20112795 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.057435103 = queryNorm
        0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3478, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3478)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Content
    Final version now available! http://youtube.com/watch?v=NLlGopyXT_g http://mediatedcultures.net A higher quality version is available for download here: http://www.mediafire.com/?6duzg3zioyd. Please note that this is the second draft and the final version will not be available until late February after I review all comments and revise the video. Please return for a new download link at that time.
    Date
    5. 1.2008 19:22:48
  20. Wu, I.-L.; Lin, H.-C.: ¬A strategy-based process for implementing knowledge management : an integrative view and empirical study (2009) 0.08 
    0.07983371 = product of:
  0.19958428 = sum of:
    0.15289429 = weight(_text_:link in 2764) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.15289429 = score(doc=2764,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.30605444 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.3287 = idf(docFreq=582, maxDocs=44218)
          0.057435103 = queryNorm
        0.49956563 = fieldWeight in 2764, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          5.3287 = idf(docFreq=582, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2764)
    0.04668998 = weight(_text_:22 in 2764) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.04668998 = score(doc=2764,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.20112795 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.057435103 = queryNorm
        0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2764, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2764)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Abstract
    Knowledge resource is unique and valuable for a link to competitive advantage based on the knowledge-based perspective. Effective knowledge management is the major concern of contemporary business managers. The key determinant of effective knowledge management is the firm's competitive strategy. The link between business strategy and knowledge management, while often discussed, has been widely ignored in practice. Moreover, while knowledge management is complex in nature, it is difficult to directly translate a firm's competitive strategy into the specific knowledge management activities. This requires first defining knowledge strategy to guide further information technology (IT)-supported implementation approaches. Finally, the ultimate goal of knowledge management lies in the realization of firm performance. Previous studies have just discussed partial relationship among these relevant knowledge concepts rather than in an integrative manner. Thus, this research proposes a complete process-based model with four components: competitive strategy, knowledge strategy, implementation approach, and firm performance. Empirical results have shown positive relationships between any two consecutive components and useful insight for knowledge implementation practice.
    Date
    22. 3.2009 19:08:51

Authors

Years

Languages

Types

  • a 3491
  • m 382
  • el 205
  • s 151
  • b 39
  • x 39
  • i 23
  • r 21
  • ? 8
  • n 5
  • p 4
  • d 3
  • u 2
  • z 2
  • au 1
  • h 1
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects

Classifications