Search (5 results, page 1 of 1)

Oberhauser, O.; Labner, J.: Relevance Ranking in Online-Katalogen : Informationsstand und Perspektiven (2003) 0.06
```
0.06296345 = product of:
  0.1259269 = sum of:
    0.1259269 = product of:
      0.2518538 = sum of:
        0.2518538 = weight(_text_:500 in 2188) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.2518538 = score(doc=2188,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.3075407 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.113391 = idf(docFreq=265, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050306078 = queryNorm
            0.8189283 = fieldWeight in 2188, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              6.113391 = idf(docFreq=265, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2188)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
```
Abstract

Bekanntlich führen Suchmaschinen wie Google &Co. beider Auflistung der Suchergebnisse ein "Ranking" nach "Relevanz" durch, d.h. die Dokumente werden in absteigender Reihenfolge entsprechend ihrer Erfüllung von Relevanzkriterien ausgeben. In Online-Katalogen (OPACs) ist derlei noch nicht allgemein übliche Praxis, doch bietet etwa das im Österreichischen Bibliothekenverbund eingesetzte System Aleph 500 tatsächlich eine solche Ranking-Option an (die im Verbundkatalog auch implementiert ist). Bislang liegen allerdings kaum Informationen zur Funktionsweise dieses Features, insbesondere auch im Hinblick auf eine Hilfestellung für Benutzer, vor. Daher möchten wir mit diesem Beitrag versuchen, den in unserem Verbund bestehenden Informationsstand zum Thema "Relevance Ranking" zu erweitern. Sowohl die Verwendung einer Ranking-Option in OPACs generell als auch die sich unter Aleph 500 konkret bietenden Möglichkeiten sollen im folgenden näher betrachtet werden.

Object

Aleph 500

Fuhr, N.: Ranking-Experimente mit gewichteter Indexierung (1986) 0.02

0.020447336 = product of:
  0.040894672 = sum of:
    0.040894672 = product of:
      0.081789345 = sum of:
        0.081789345 = weight(_text_:22 in 58) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.081789345 = score(doc=58,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17616332 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050306078 = queryNorm
            0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 58, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=58)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Date: 14. 6.2015 22:12:44

Fuhr, N.: Rankingexperimente mit gewichteter Indexierung (1986) 0.02

0.020447336 = product of:
  0.040894672 = sum of:
    0.040894672 = product of:
      0.081789345 = sum of:
        0.081789345 = weight(_text_:22 in 2051) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.081789345 = score(doc=2051,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17616332 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050306078 = queryNorm
            0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 2051, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2051)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Date: 14. 6.2015 22:12:56

Tober, M.; Hennig, L.; Furch, D.: SEO Ranking-Faktoren und Rang-Korrelationen 2014 : Google Deutschland (2014) 0.01

0.013631558 = product of:
  0.027263116 = sum of:
    0.027263116 = product of:
      0.054526232 = sum of:
        0.054526232 = weight(_text_:22 in 1484) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.054526232 = score(doc=1484,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17616332 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050306078 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1484, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1484)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Date: 13. 9.2014 14:45:22

Kanaeva, Z.: Ranking: Google und CiteSeer (2005) 0.01

0.011927613 = product of:
  0.023855226 = sum of:
    0.023855226 = product of:
      0.047710452 = sum of:
        0.047710452 = weight(_text_:22 in 3276) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.047710452 = score(doc=3276,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17616332 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050306078 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 3276, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3276)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Date: 20. 3.2005 16:23:22

Search (5 results, page 1 of 1)

Authors

Years

Types

Themes