Search (25 results, page 1 of 2)

  • × year_i:[2010 TO 2020}
  • × theme_ss:"Internet"
  1. Gorrell, G.; Bontcheva, K.: Classifying Twitter favorites : Like, bookmark, or Thanks? (2016) 0.03 
    0.025965689 = product of:
  0.051931378 = sum of:
    0.051931378 = product of:
      0.103862755 = sum of:
        0.103862755 = weight(_text_:500 in 2487) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.103862755 = score(doc=2487,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.3075407 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.113391 = idf(docFreq=265, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050306078 = queryNorm
            0.33772033 = fieldWeight in 2487, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              6.113391 = idf(docFreq=265, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2487)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Since its foundation in 2006, Twitter has enjoyed a meteoric rise in popularity, currently boasting over 500 million users. Its short text nature means that the service is open to a variety of different usage patterns, which have evolved rapidly in terms of user base and utilization. Prior work has categorized Twitter users, as well as studied the use of lists and re-tweets and how these can be used to infer user profiles and interests. The focus of this article is on studying why and how Twitter users mark tweets as "favorites"-a functionality with currently poorly understood usage, but strong relevance for personalization and information access applications. Firstly, manual analysis and classification are carried out on a randomly chosen set of favorited tweets, which reveal different approaches to using this functionality (i.e., bookmarks, thanks, like, conversational, and self-promotion). Secondly, an automatic favorites classification approach is proposed, based on the categories established in the previous step. Our machine learning experiments demonstrate a high degree of success in matching human judgments in classifying favorites according to usage type. In conclusion, we discuss the purposes to which these data could be put, in the context of identifying users' patterns of interests.
  2. Boss, C.: Konzeption und Aufbereitung kuratierter Twitter-Listen als Recherchewerkzeug (2017) 0.03 
    0.025965689 = product of:
  0.051931378 = sum of:
    0.051931378 = product of:
      0.103862755 = sum of:
        0.103862755 = weight(_text_:500 in 3724) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.103862755 = score(doc=3724,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.3075407 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.113391 = idf(docFreq=265, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050306078 = queryNorm
            0.33772033 = fieldWeight in 3724, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              6.113391 = idf(docFreq=265, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3724)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Meist reicht ein Blick in die Nachrichten und es wird schnell klar - Inhalte aus sozialen Medien haben einen festen Platz in der Berichterstattung eingenommen. Redakteure binden Fotos von Facebook oder Instagram in Beiträge ein, zeigen Videos von YouTube oder Snapchat und zitieren Tweets. So genannte "Netzreaktionen" und User Generated Content sind seit Langem fester Bestandteil journalistischer Formate. Soziale Netzwerke dienen aber nicht nur der Anreicherung von Beiträgen mit Bildmaterial. Worüber das Netz diskutiert, was gerade "viral" ist und sich überdurchschnittlich schnell in den Communities des World Wide Web verbreitet , dient auch als Trendbarometer und Fundus für die Themenfindung. Aber nicht alles ist bekanntlich Gold, was glänzt. Denn während soziale Netzwerke einerseits wie eine schier unerschöpfliche Quelle quotenträchtiger Stoffe anmuten, so bergen sie doch andererseits einige Hindernisse und Stolpersteine auf dem Weg zum vermeintlich strahlenden Content. Da wäre zum einen die schiere Masse an Posts und Tweets, an Snaps und Live­Videos. So offenbart allein die Nutzerstatistik der Plattform Twitter aus dem Jahr 2016 eine Bilanz von etwa 500 Millionen Tweets - täglich. Zum anderen müssen authentische Inhalte von Spam und Fakes getrennt werden. Journalisten - und alle, die sie bei ihrer Tätigkeit unterstützen - stehen also vor der nicht zu unterschätzenden Herausforderung, soziale Medien effizient zu beobachten, in ihnen zu recherchieren sowie interessante und gleichzeitig echte Inhalte zu selektieren. An die Kuration (lat. curare = sorgen, sich kümmern) von Webinhalten werden bestimmte Erwartungen gestellt. Sie erfordert Expertenwissen auf den abgedeckten Gebieten, ein gutes Informationsmanagement, eine enge Vernetzung mit Quellen und Kanälen sowie die Fähigkeit, den Überblick zu behalten.
  3. Schultz, S.: ¬Die eine App für alles : Mobile Zukunft in China (2016) 0.02 
    0.019277936 = product of:
  0.03855587 = sum of:
    0.03855587 = product of:
      0.07711174 = sum of:
        0.07711174 = weight(_text_:22 in 4313) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07711174 = score(doc=4313,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.17616332 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050306078 = queryNorm
            0.4377287 = fieldWeight in 4313, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4313)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    22. 6.2018 14:22:02
  4. Landwehr, A.: China schafft digitales Punktesystem für den "besseren" Menschen (2018) 0.01 
    0.013631558 = product of:
  0.027263116 = sum of:
    0.027263116 = product of:
      0.054526232 = sum of:
        0.054526232 = weight(_text_:22 in 4314) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.054526232 = score(doc=4314,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17616332 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050306078 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4314, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4314)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    22. 6.2018 14:29:46
  5. Andrade, T.C.; Dodebei, V.: Traces of digitized newspapers and bom-digital news sites : a trail to the memory on the internet (2016) 0.01 
    0.013631558 = product of:
  0.027263116 = sum of:
    0.027263116 = product of:
      0.054526232 = sum of:
        0.054526232 = weight(_text_:22 in 4901) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.054526232 = score(doc=4901,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17616332 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050306078 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4901, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4901)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    19. 1.2019 17:42:22
  6. Social Media und Web Science : das Web als Lebensraum, Düsseldorf, 22. - 23. März 2012, Proceedings, hrsg. von Marlies Ockenfeld, Isabella Peters und Katrin Weller. DGI, Frankfurt am Main 2012 (2012) 0.01 
    0.011927613 = product of:
  0.023855226 = sum of:
    0.023855226 = product of:
      0.047710452 = sum of:
        0.047710452 = weight(_text_:22 in 1517) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.047710452 = score(doc=1517,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17616332 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050306078 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 1517, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1517)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
  7. Oguz, F.; Koehler, W.: URL decay at year 20 : a research note (2016) 0.01 
    0.011927613 = product of:
  0.023855226 = sum of:
    0.023855226 = product of:
      0.047710452 = sum of:
        0.047710452 = weight(_text_:22 in 2651) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.047710452 = score(doc=2651,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17616332 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050306078 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2651, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2651)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    22. 1.2016 14:37:14
  8. Hartmann, B.: Ab ins MoMA : zum virtuellen Museumsgang (2011) 0.01 
    0.010223668 = product of:
  0.020447336 = sum of:
    0.020447336 = product of:
      0.040894672 = sum of:
        0.040894672 = weight(_text_:22 in 1821) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.040894672 = score(doc=1821,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17616332 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050306078 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1821, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1821)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    3. 5.1997 8:44:22
  9. Thelwall, M.; Buckley, K.; Paltoglou, G.: Sentiment in Twitter events (2011) 0.01 
    0.010223668 = product of:
  0.020447336 = sum of:
    0.020447336 = product of:
      0.040894672 = sum of:
        0.040894672 = weight(_text_:22 in 4345) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.040894672 = score(doc=4345,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17616332 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050306078 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4345, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4345)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    22. 1.2011 14:27:06
  10. Okoli, C.; Mehdi, M.; Mesgari, M.; Nielsen, F.A.; Lanamäki, A.: Wikipedia in the eyes of its beholders : a systematic review of scholarly research on Wikipedia readers and readership (2014) 0.01 
    0.010223668 = product of:
  0.020447336 = sum of:
    0.020447336 = product of:
      0.040894672 = sum of:
        0.040894672 = weight(_text_:22 in 1540) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.040894672 = score(doc=1540,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17616332 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050306078 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1540, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1540)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    18.11.2014 13:22:03
  11. Firnkes, M.: Schöne neue Welt : der Content der Zukunft wird von Algorithmen bestimmt (2015) 0.01 
    0.010223668 = product of:
  0.020447336 = sum of:
    0.020447336 = product of:
      0.040894672 = sum of:
        0.040894672 = weight(_text_:22 in 2118) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.040894672 = score(doc=2118,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17616332 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050306078 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2118, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2118)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    5. 7.2015 22:02:31
  12. Egbert, J.; Biber, D.; Davies, M.: Developing a bottom-up, user-based method of web register classification (2015) 0.01 
    0.010223668 = product of:
  0.020447336 = sum of:
    0.020447336 = product of:
      0.040894672 = sum of:
        0.040894672 = weight(_text_:22 in 2158) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.040894672 = score(doc=2158,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17616332 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050306078 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2158, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2158)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    4. 8.2015 19:22:04
  13. Evans, H.K.; Ovalle, J.; Green, S.: Rockin' robins : do congresswomen rule the roost in the Twittersphere? (2016) 0.01 
    0.010223668 = product of:
  0.020447336 = sum of:
    0.020447336 = product of:
      0.040894672 = sum of:
        0.040894672 = weight(_text_:22 in 2636) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.040894672 = score(doc=2636,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17616332 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050306078 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2636, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2636)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    22. 1.2016 11:51:19
  14. Arbelaitz, O.; Martínez-Otzeta. J.M.; Muguerza, J.: User modeling in a social network for cognitively disabled people (2016) 0.01 
    0.010223668 = product of:
  0.020447336 = sum of:
    0.020447336 = product of:
      0.040894672 = sum of:
        0.040894672 = weight(_text_:22 in 2639) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.040894672 = score(doc=2639,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17616332 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050306078 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2639, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2639)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    22. 1.2016 12:02:26
  15. Dufour, C.; Bartlett, J.C.; Toms, E.G.: Understanding how webcasts are used as sources of information (2011) 0.01 
    0.008519724 = product of:
  0.017039448 = sum of:
    0.017039448 = product of:
      0.034078896 = sum of:
        0.034078896 = weight(_text_:22 in 4195) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.034078896 = score(doc=4195,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17616332 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050306078 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 4195, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4195)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    22. 1.2011 14:16:14
  16. Zimmer, M.; Proferes, N.J.: ¬A topology of Twitter research : disciplines, methods, and ethics (2014) 0.01 
    0.008519724 = product of:
  0.017039448 = sum of:
    0.017039448 = product of:
      0.034078896 = sum of:
        0.034078896 = weight(_text_:22 in 1622) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.034078896 = score(doc=1622,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17616332 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050306078 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1622, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1622)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    20. 1.2015 18:30:22
  17. Bhattacharya, S.; Yang, C.; Srinivasan, P.; Boynton, B.: Perceptions of presidential candidates' personalities in twitter (2016) 0.01 
    0.008519724 = product of:
  0.017039448 = sum of:
    0.017039448 = product of:
      0.034078896 = sum of:
        0.034078896 = weight(_text_:22 in 2635) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.034078896 = score(doc=2635,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17616332 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050306078 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2635, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2635)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    22. 1.2016 11:25:47
  18. Bhatia, S.; Biyani, P.; Mitra, P.: Identifying the role of individual user messages in an online discussion and its use in thread retrieval (2016) 0.01 
    0.008519724 = product of:
  0.017039448 = sum of:
    0.017039448 = product of:
      0.034078896 = sum of:
        0.034078896 = weight(_text_:22 in 2650) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.034078896 = score(doc=2650,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17616332 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050306078 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2650, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2650)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    22. 1.2016 11:50:46
  19. Dalip, D.H.; Gonçalves, M.A.; Cristo, M.; Calado, P.: ¬A general multiview framework for assessing the quality of collaboratively created content on web 2.0 (2017) 0.01 
    0.008519724 = product of:
  0.017039448 = sum of:
    0.017039448 = product of:
      0.034078896 = sum of:
        0.034078896 = weight(_text_:22 in 3343) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.034078896 = score(doc=3343,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17616332 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050306078 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 3343, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3343)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    16.11.2017 13:04:22
  20. Bünte, O.: Bundesdatenschutzbeauftragte bezweifelt Facebooks Datenschutzversprechen (2018) 0.01 
    0.008519724 = product of:
  0.017039448 = sum of:
    0.017039448 = product of:
      0.034078896 = sum of:
        0.034078896 = weight(_text_:22 in 4180) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.034078896 = score(doc=4180,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17616332 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050306078 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 4180, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4180)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    23. 3.2018 13:41:22

Authors

Languages

  • e 16
  • d 8

Types

  • a 22
  • el 4
  • m 1
  • s 1
  • More… Less…

Themes

Classifications