Search (46 results, page 1 of 3)

  • × theme_ss:"Bestandsaufstellung"
  1. Schössow, T.; Christoffersen, A.; Norlem, E.; Christensen, S.: Art in the children's library (1992) 0.12
    0.11963187 = product of:
      0.23926374 = sum of:
        0.053599782 = weight(_text_:library in 913) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.053599782 = score(doc=913,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.1317883 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050121464 = queryNorm
            0.40671125 = fieldWeight in 913, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=913)
        0.18566397 = sum of:
          0.13812861 = weight(_text_:project in 913) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.13812861 = score(doc=913,freq=8.0), product of:
              0.21156175 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.220981 = idf(docFreq=1764, maxDocs=44218)
                0.050121464 = queryNorm
              0.6528997 = fieldWeight in 913, product of:
                2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                  8.0 = termFreq=8.0
                4.220981 = idf(docFreq=1764, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=913)
          0.047535364 = weight(_text_:22 in 913) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.047535364 = score(doc=913,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17551683 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.050121464 = queryNorm
              0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 913, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=913)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    Describes a project designed to integrate art into the children's library at Espergaerde in Denmark. Explains the aims of the project, principally to make the use of the library an artistic experience, and the 3 tasks the project was to fulfil: the redesign of the interior using artwork by local artists; a change from the traditional arrangement of fiction; and provision of workshop facilities for children to exercise their artistic inclinations. Details how these tasks were accopmplished and discusses the results of the project, stressing the renewed appreciation of art and the importance of passing that on to children
    Source
    Scandinavian public library quarterly. 25(1992) no.1, S.20-22
  2. Weaver, M.; Stanning, M.: Reclassification project at St Martin's College : a case study (2007) 0.06
    0.058327764 = product of:
      0.11665553 = sum of:
        0.046890046 = weight(_text_:library in 852) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.046890046 = score(doc=852,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.1317883 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050121464 = queryNorm
            0.35579824 = fieldWeight in 852, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=852)
        0.069765486 = product of:
          0.13953097 = sum of:
            0.13953097 = weight(_text_:project in 852) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.13953097 = score(doc=852,freq=16.0), product of:
                0.21156175 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.220981 = idf(docFreq=1764, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050121464 = queryNorm
                0.6595283 = fieldWeight in 852, product of:
                  4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
                    16.0 = termFreq=16.0
                  4.220981 = idf(docFreq=1764, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=852)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    Purpose - The purpose of this article is to outline the approach taken to the reclassification of the library collection within a small multi-site college of higher education - whereby 160,000 volumes were converted from the BLISS system to the Dewey Decimal Classification system, over a period of 11 weeks during Summer 2004. Design/methodology/approach - An automated approach was taken whereby the Library Systems Supplier - Talis was commissioned to convert catalogue records using a batch process. Risk analysis and critical path analysis were used as tools to keep the project on schedule and provide quality control. Findings - An automated approach allowed the project to be completed on time, within budget and with minimal disruption to services. Project planning was crucial to the success of the project. This included mapping BLISS to Dewey numbers, recruitment of a student team, management of work packages and ensuring continuity of the Library Service during the project. Practical implications - Institutional support for the project was secured because of its relevance to the College's corporate agenda and the promise of a wider impact that the project would have in terms of modernisation of the library service. Originality/value - Despite the apparent lack of current articles on re-classification, many libraries are still grappling with ongoing retrospective cataloguing projects. This case study demonstrates how one institution approached the problem and demonstrates that an automated approach can yield benefits. It will be of use to other libraries thinking of, or involved with, similar conversions. The partnership role of the Library Management System Supplier is also highlighted.
    Source
    Library review. 56(2007) no.1, S.61-72
  3. Waal, J. d.: genre-indeling van digitale media : Nieuwe media passen niet in SISO (1995) 0.06
    0.056123044 = product of:
      0.11224609 = sum of:
        0.068930924 = weight(_text_:digital in 4659) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.068930924 = score(doc=4659,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.19770671 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050121464 = queryNorm
            0.34865242 = fieldWeight in 4659, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4659)
        0.043315165 = weight(_text_:library in 4659) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.043315165 = score(doc=4659,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.1317883 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050121464 = queryNorm
            0.32867232 = fieldWeight in 4659, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4659)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    Collections of interactive games on diskette, CD-ROM and CD-i form an important element of public library collections in the Netherlands. However, the Dutch SISO shelf arragement lacks provision for such materials. At Oss public library an arrangement with numerous categories and subdivisions has been devised to accomodate games. Loan figures show that younger borrowers prefer strategy and adventure games, while older borrowers choose puzzle and utilities materials
    Footnote
    Übers. des Titels: SISO is unable to accomodate the new media: a catagory subdivision for digital media
  4. Drezek, G.: Call number relabelling project in an amalgamated university library : how and why we relabelled 170.000 items in three weeks and what good did it to us? (1993) 0.06
    0.055835553 = product of:
      0.111671105 = sum of:
        0.043315165 = weight(_text_:library in 3075) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.043315165 = score(doc=3075,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.1317883 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050121464 = queryNorm
            0.32867232 = fieldWeight in 3075, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3075)
        0.06835594 = product of:
          0.13671188 = sum of:
            0.13671188 = weight(_text_:project in 3075) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.13671188 = score(doc=3075,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.21156175 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.220981 = idf(docFreq=1764, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050121464 = queryNorm
                0.64620316 = fieldWeight in 3075, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  4.220981 = idf(docFreq=1764, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3075)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    Discusses a major collection relabelling project undertaken by Queensland University of Technology Library in order to provide a consistent classification and accession numbering scheme on all campuses. The project is examined in terms of how it was done, what was achieved, and what went wrong
  5. Bettella, C.; Capodaglio, C.; Ramous, C.; Vettore, M.C.: Declassifying the Library of Congress Classification : the case of the Department of Philosophy Library at the University of Padova (Padua, Italy) (2009) 0.04
    0.041302897 = product of:
      0.082605794 = sum of:
        0.048427828 = weight(_text_:library in 3271) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.048427828 = score(doc=3271,freq=20.0), product of:
            0.1317883 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050121464 = queryNorm
            0.36746684 = fieldWeight in 3271, product of:
              4.472136 = tf(freq=20.0), with freq of:
                20.0 = termFreq=20.0
              2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3271)
        0.03417797 = product of:
          0.06835594 = sum of:
            0.06835594 = weight(_text_:project in 3271) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06835594 = score(doc=3271,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.21156175 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.220981 = idf(docFreq=1764, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050121464 = queryNorm
                0.32310158 = fieldWeight in 3271, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  4.220981 = idf(docFreq=1764, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3271)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    The ongoing project to revise the arrangement of the open shelves library collections occasioned a historiographic account of the implementation phases of the Library of Congress Classification (LCC), subclasses B-BJ - Philosophy and Psychology, at the Library of the Department of Philosophy of the University of Padua (Italy). The schema was adopted as a collection shelving and location device since the Library institution in 1997. The LCC international acknowledgement and the neutral framework of the schema have undoubtedly played a role of driving factors at the first stage of the selection process. However, the implementation of the classification scheme had to consider critical issues like the shortage of the library area, the selection criteria of the appropriate bibliographic material, as well as the effort to settle and tailor the original schema to the specific needs of the library collections and its end-users. The purpose of this paper is twofold: from one hand, we aim to examine in detail each stage of the implementation project in order to provide a preliminary impact evaluation of the classification schema both on the collections management and development and on the research practices of the local users community; from the other, we intend to highlight the principal factors that have implied a sort of declassification process of the system itself. In conclusion, we argue that the declassification of library collections can be read, from a bottom-up perspective, as index of vitality of the collections themselves, as well as a valuable basis for planning the next steps of the Library project.
  6. Whelan, J.A.: Public access compact shelving in an academic branch library (1996) 0.04
    0.04010655 = product of:
      0.0802131 = sum of:
        0.05305003 = weight(_text_:library in 344) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05305003 = score(doc=344,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.1317883 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050121464 = queryNorm
            0.40253976 = fieldWeight in 344, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=344)
        0.027163066 = product of:
          0.054326132 = sum of:
            0.054326132 = weight(_text_:22 in 344) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.054326132 = score(doc=344,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17551683 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050121464 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 344, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=344)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    The Colorado University at Boulder Libraries, Leonard H. Gemmill Engineering Library, USA, uses mobile compact shelving for its open stack collection. Describes the library collection, the shelves, configuration and equipment, capacity and use, maintenance and repairs, and the affect of power cuts and flooding. Discusses ths staff and users' reactions and the lessons learnt
    Source
    Colorado libraries. 22(1996) no.1, S.29-32
  7. Manzi, S.: Classifying philosophy at the Library of the Scuola Normale Superiore (Pisa, Italy) : Part B: evaluation and experience (2009) 0.04
    0.038320176 = product of:
      0.07664035 = sum of:
        0.05626805 = weight(_text_:library in 1858) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05626805 = score(doc=1858,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.1317883 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050121464 = queryNorm
            0.42695788 = fieldWeight in 1858, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1858)
        0.0203723 = product of:
          0.0407446 = sum of:
            0.0407446 = weight(_text_:22 in 1858) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0407446 = score(doc=1858,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17551683 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050121464 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1858, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1858)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    The verification of the functionality of the Philosophy classification schema adopted at the Library of the Scuola Normale Superiore needs to take into account the context: the Library is both a special and a multidisciplinary library; its collections reflect the history of the SNS. The philosophy collection has a specialized and selective nature, as do others within the same Library; the Library is open shelves, and classification is used as a shelving and location device. Bearing in mind the above conditions, the second part of this paper examines the strengths and weaknesses of the schema in order to highlight its suitability to match a coherent classification of documents with the effective fruition by the users.
    Date
    9. 1.2010 14:22:20
  8. Dean, B.C.: Reclassification in an automated environment (1984) 0.04
    0.03717283 = product of:
      0.07434566 = sum of:
        0.032486375 = weight(_text_:library in 340) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.032486375 = score(doc=340,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.1317883 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050121464 = queryNorm
            0.24650425 = fieldWeight in 340, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=340)
        0.041859288 = product of:
          0.083718576 = sum of:
            0.083718576 = weight(_text_:project in 340) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.083718576 = score(doc=340,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.21156175 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.220981 = idf(docFreq=1764, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050121464 = queryNorm
                0.39571697 = fieldWeight in 340, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  4.220981 = idf(docFreq=1764, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=340)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    For a variety of reasons, reclassification was a popular project in libraries in the 1960s. Although such projects have faded from the limelight, some of the reasons for doing them remain valid today, i.e., a need to cut processing costs, participation in cooperative ventures, the inconvenience caused by working with a collection split between two classification systems, and continuing changes in the Dewey schedules. This article compares the steps needed for reclassifying in a manual environment with those required when the library has an in-house computer system. The comparison shows how using the latter makes a reclassification project more feasible than it would be in a totally manual library. The article also discusses various issues associated with reclassification in an automated environment such as the problem posed by a frozen public catalog and the combining of reclassification and conversion projects.
  9. Saarti, J.: Feeding with the spoon, or the effects of shelf classification of fiction on the loaning of fiction (1997) 0.04
    0.03621646 = product of:
      0.07243292 = sum of:
        0.03790077 = weight(_text_:library in 1745) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03790077 = score(doc=1745,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.1317883 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050121464 = queryNorm
            0.28758827 = fieldWeight in 1745, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1745)
        0.034532152 = product of:
          0.069064304 = sum of:
            0.069064304 = weight(_text_:project in 1745) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.069064304 = score(doc=1745,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.21156175 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.220981 = idf(docFreq=1764, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050121464 = queryNorm
                0.32644984 = fieldWeight in 1745, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.220981 = idf(docFreq=1764, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1745)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    Investigates what effect the shelf classification of fiction had on the way that library users in the 2 branch libraries of Kajanni, Finland, use the library's stock of fiction and how they loan fiction. In 1 library the fiction stock was divided in 11 shelf categories, based on genres of fiction - in the other no changes were made. The books were also indexed and classified in the library's database. The project lasted for 3 years and the results were gathered by interviewing clients and making statistical analysis on loans in both libraries
  10. Saarti, J.: Experiments with categorising fiction in Lohtajy Library (1992) 0.04
    0.035239115 = product of:
      0.07047823 = sum of:
        0.043315165 = weight(_text_:library in 31) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.043315165 = score(doc=31,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.1317883 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050121464 = queryNorm
            0.32867232 = fieldWeight in 31, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=31)
        0.027163066 = product of:
          0.054326132 = sum of:
            0.054326132 = weight(_text_:22 in 31) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.054326132 = score(doc=31,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17551683 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050121464 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 31, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=31)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Source
    Scandinavian public library quarterly. 25(1992) no.4, S.22-24,29
  11. Shorten, J.; Seikel, M.; Ahrberg, J.H.: Why do you still use dewey? : Academic libraries that continue with dewey decimal classification (2005) 0.03
    0.033157483 = product of:
      0.066314965 = sum of:
        0.045942668 = weight(_text_:library in 125) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.045942668 = score(doc=125,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.1317883 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050121464 = queryNorm
            0.34860963 = fieldWeight in 125, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=125)
        0.0203723 = product of:
          0.0407446 = sum of:
            0.0407446 = weight(_text_:22 in 125) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0407446 = score(doc=125,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17551683 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050121464 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 125, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=125)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    Reclassification was a popular trend during the 1960s and 1970s for many academic libraries wanting to change from Dewey Decimal Classification (DDC) to Library of Congress (LC) Classification. In 2002, Southern Illinois University at Carbondale's Morris Library changed from DDC to LC. If one academic library recently converted, might other DDC academic libraries consider switching, too? Conversely, for those academic libraries that remain with DDC, what are the reasons they continue with it? A survey of thirty-four DDC academic libraries in the United States and Canada determined what factors influence these libraries to continue using DDC, and if reclassification is something they have considered or are considering. The survey also investigated whether patrons of these DDC libraries prefer LC and if their preference influences the library's decision to reclassify. Results from the survey indicate that the issue of reclassification is being considered by some of these libraries even though, overall, they are satisfied with DDC. The study was unable to determine if patrons' preference for a classification scheme influenced a library's decision to reclassify.
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
    Source
    Library resources and technical services. 49(2005) no.2, S.123-133
  12. Frigerio, L.: From disorder to order : a challenge for the philosopher and the librarian (Milan, Italy) (2009) 0.03
    0.028911047 = product of:
      0.057822093 = sum of:
        0.033156272 = weight(_text_:library in 3270) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.033156272 = score(doc=3270,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.1317883 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050121464 = queryNorm
            0.25158736 = fieldWeight in 3270, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3270)
        0.024665821 = product of:
          0.049331643 = sum of:
            0.049331643 = weight(_text_:project in 3270) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.049331643 = score(doc=3270,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.21156175 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.220981 = idf(docFreq=1764, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050121464 = queryNorm
                0.23317845 = fieldWeight in 3270, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.220981 = idf(docFreq=1764, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3270)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    The Philosophy Library at the University of Milan was born in the fifties by the merger of the two Institutes of Philosophy and the History of Philosophy. Once the restoration had been completed, it was necessary to devise a suitable classification system in order to arrange the books and to meet the new research needs of the Institutes. The project was untrusted to Prof. Corrado Mangione and Prof. Maria Assunta del Torre, with the theoretical contribution of Giuliana Sapori, chief Director of Central Library of the Faculty of Laws and Humanities. The model had been conceived as completely anew, without any reference toother existing classification systems. The inspiring principles were from one hand the choice for an open shelving system, from the other one the idea that the orientation criteria and the book search had to be user-friendly for everyone. This paper provides an in-depth analysis of the making-up of the call number as applied to each section of the collection, and how the scheme has been developed over the past fifty years. Points of strenght and weakness of the scheme are also discussed at the light of the technological innovations which have gradually affected the whole of the library activities, notably with the introduction of the electronic catalogue. The original classification scheme has maintened its coherence and functionality over time, in spite of the expansion of the collection and the automation of all stages of the classification process. This is the main reason to keep using it in the future.
  13. Tiggelen, N. van: ¬Een landelijk systeem zou ideaal zijn : bibliotheken van Leerdam en Weert experimenteren met alternatieve plaatsing (1998) 0.03
    0.028895756 = product of:
      0.057791512 = sum of:
        0.030628446 = weight(_text_:library in 4494) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.030628446 = score(doc=4494,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1317883 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050121464 = queryNorm
            0.23240642 = fieldWeight in 4494, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4494)
        0.027163066 = product of:
          0.054326132 = sum of:
            0.054326132 = weight(_text_:22 in 4494) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.054326132 = score(doc=4494,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17551683 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050121464 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4494, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4494)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    Dissatisfied with the national public library classification SISO some public libraries experiment with a own, more user friendly system
    Source
    BibliotheekBlad. 2(1998) no.10/11, S.22-24
  14. Rotten, C. v.d.: oderzoek naar alternatieve plaatsing : Bijna net zoveel systemen als bibliotheken (1995) 0.03
    0.025283787 = product of:
      0.050567575 = sum of:
        0.026799891 = weight(_text_:library in 4660) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.026799891 = score(doc=4660,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1317883 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050121464 = queryNorm
            0.20335563 = fieldWeight in 4660, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4660)
        0.023767682 = product of:
          0.047535364 = sum of:
            0.047535364 = weight(_text_:22 in 4660) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.047535364 = score(doc=4660,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17551683 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050121464 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 4660, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4660)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    In the last 10 years a number of libraries in the Netherlands have developed akternative shelf arrangements to the standard SISO system. A survey undertaken at Felde children's library following the implementation of an alternative arrangement showed that children had been unaware of the change. In 1989 the Nederlands Bibliothekk en Lektuur Centrum (Dutch Centre for Libraries and Reading) began developing a system based on trials at 15 libraries. Further implementations of the system should take account of developments with automated catalogues
    Source
    Bibliotheek en samenleving. 23(1995) no.11, S.20-22
  15. Hyman, R.J.: Access to library collections : summary of a documentary and opinion survey on the direct shelf approach and browsing (1971) 0.02
    0.016243188 = product of:
      0.06497275 = sum of:
        0.06497275 = weight(_text_:library in 2428) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06497275 = score(doc=2428,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.1317883 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050121464 = queryNorm
            0.4930085 = fieldWeight in 2428, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2428)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    Library resources and technical services. 15(1971), S.479-491
  16. Smiraglia, R.P.: Shelflisting music : guidelines for use with the Library of Congress Classification: M (2008) 0.02
    0.016243188 = product of:
      0.06497275 = sum of:
        0.06497275 = weight(_text_:library in 4238) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06497275 = score(doc=4238,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.1317883 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050121464 = queryNorm
            0.4930085 = fieldWeight in 4238, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4238)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Imprint
    Lanham, MD : Scarecrow Press /Music Library Association
  17. Boll, J.J.: Shelf browsing, open access and storage capacity in research libraries (1985) 0.02
    0.015314223 = product of:
      0.061256893 = sum of:
        0.061256893 = weight(_text_:library in 3326) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.061256893 = score(doc=3326,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1317883 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050121464 = queryNorm
            0.46481284 = fieldWeight in 3326, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=3326)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Imprint
    Champaign, Ill. : Univ. of Illinois, Graduate School of Library and Information Science
  18. Beck, S.G.: Wayfinding in libraries (1996) 0.02
    0.015314223 = product of:
      0.061256893 = sum of:
        0.061256893 = weight(_text_:library in 5503) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.061256893 = score(doc=5503,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.1317883 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050121464 = queryNorm
            0.46481284 = fieldWeight in 5503, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5503)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    Identifies the architectural barriers in library buildings facing disabled users with particular reference to wayfinding and the provision of suitable signage, amps and ways of making spatial patterns within libraries more self evident. Concludes with notes on emergency egress and recommendations for making library buildings highly usable and easily navigable for library users in general and disabled people in particular
    Source
    Library hi tech. 14(1996) no.1, S.27-36
  19. Kleiner, E.: Blended Shelf : Ein realitätsbasierter Ansatz zur Präsentation und Exploration von Bibliotheksbeständen (2014) 0.02
    0.015231727 = product of:
      0.060926907 = sum of:
        0.060926907 = weight(_text_:digital in 1273) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.060926907 = score(doc=1273,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.19770671 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050121464 = queryNorm
            0.3081681 = fieldWeight in 1273, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1273)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    Gegenstand dieses Buches ist das User Interface Blended Shelf, welches die Erfahrung des Regal-Browsings jenseits des physischen Ortes Bibliothek ermöglicht. Das Regal-Browsing bietet Nutzern zahlreiche Vorteile und wird aktiv als Recherchestrategie eingesetzt. Für Bibliotheken gibt es bisher kaum einsetzbare und erprobte Anwendungen, die das Regal-Browsing digital, und damit losgelöst vom Einsatzort und der Nutzungszeit, ermöglichen. Ziel des Buches ist es, ein User Interface zu entwickeln, welches die Erfahrung des Regal-Browsings digital anbietet, ohne dabei die wesentlichen Vorteile zu verlieren, die stark im physischen Raum verankert sind. Um dies zu erreichen, werden im ersten Teil der Thesis anhand der theoretischen Hintergründe des Regal-Browsings, einer Umfeld- und Bedarfsanalyse sowie verwandter Arbeiten grundlegende Anforderungen erhoben. Die theoretisch formulierten Anforderungen bilden das Fundament für die konkrete Implementierung, die Funktionsweise und das realitätsbasierte Interaktionsdesign des Bleded Shelf. Dies Aspekte werden im mittleren Teil der Arbeit dargestellt. Um zu prüfen, ob die Implementierung die Anforderungen erfüllt und die Benutzerschnittstelle von Nutzern als als hilfreich und nutzbar wahrgenommen wird, wurde eine umfangreiche Feldstudie durchgeführt.
  20. Booth, P.F.: Together or apart : the problems of stock integration (1991) 0.01
    0.013535989 = product of:
      0.054143958 = sum of:
        0.054143958 = weight(_text_:library in 4898) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.054143958 = score(doc=4898,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.1317883 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050121464 = queryNorm
            0.4108404 = fieldWeight in 4898, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4898)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    Examines decisions made about the arrangement of stock in libraries and warns against rigid rules. Every library should have its own policy, taking into account the types of users and their particular information needs, and the kinds of information materials held and their particular characteristics
    Source
    Library work. 1991, no.13, S.7-8