Search (15 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × year_i:[2010 TO 2020}
  • × theme_ss:"Informationsmittel"
  1. Okoli, C.; Mehdi, M.; Mesgari, M.; Nielsen, F.A.; Lanamäki, A.: Wikipedia in the eyes of its beholders : a systematic review of scholarly research on Wikipedia readers and readership (2014) 0.04
    0.036035247 = product of:
      0.072070494 = sum of:
        0.051698197 = weight(_text_:digital in 1540) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.051698197 = score(doc=1540,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.19770671 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050121464 = queryNorm
            0.26148933 = fieldWeight in 1540, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1540)
        0.0203723 = product of:
          0.0407446 = sum of:
            0.0407446 = weight(_text_:22 in 1540) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0407446 = score(doc=1540,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17551683 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050121464 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1540, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1540)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    Hundreds of scholarly studies have investigated various aspects of Wikipedia. Although a number of literature reviews have provided overviews of this vast body of research, none has specifically focused on the readers of Wikipedia and issues concerning its readership. In this systematic literature review, we review 99 studies to synthesize current knowledge regarding the readership of Wikipedia and provide an analysis of research methods employed. The scholarly research has found that Wikipedia is popular not only for lighter topics such as entertainment but also for more serious topics such as health and legal information. Scholars, librarians, and students are common users, and Wikipedia provides a unique opportunity for educating students in digital literacy. We conclude with a summary of key findings, implications for researchers, and implications for the Wikipedia community.
    Date
    18.11.2014 13:22:03
  2. Luyt, B.; Ally, Y.; Low, N.H.; Ismail, N.B.: Librarian perception of Wikipedia : threats or opportunities for librarianship? (2010) 0.03
    0.031112304 = product of:
      0.062224608 = sum of:
        0.043081827 = weight(_text_:digital in 5076) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.043081827 = score(doc=5076,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.19770671 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050121464 = queryNorm
            0.21790776 = fieldWeight in 5076, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5076)
        0.01914278 = weight(_text_:library in 5076) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.01914278 = score(doc=5076,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1317883 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050121464 = queryNorm
            0.14525402 = fieldWeight in 5076, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5076)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    The rapid rise of Wikipedia as an information source has placed the traditional role of librarians as information gatekeepers and guardians under scrutiny with much of the professional literature suggesting that librarians are polarized over the issue of whether Wikipedia is a useful reference tool. This qualitative study examines the perceptions and behaviours of National Library Board (NLB) of Singapore librarians with regards to information seeking and usage of Wikipedia. It finds that instead of polarized attitudes, most librarians, although cautious about using Wikipedia in their professional capacity, hold a range of generally positive attitudes towards the online encyclopaedia, believing that it has a valid role to play in the information seeking of patrons today. This is heartening because it suggests the existence within the librarian population of attitudes that can be tapped to engage constructively with Wikipedia. Three of these in particular are briefly discussed at the end of the article: Wikipedia's ability to appeal to the socalled "digital natives," its role as a source of non-Western information, and its potential to enable a revitalization of the role of librarians as public intellectuals contributing to a democratic information commons.
  3. Deardorff, A.; Masterton, K.; Roberts, K.; Kilicoglu, H.; Demner-Fushman, D.: ¬A protocol-driven approach to automatically finding authoritative answers to consumer health questions in online resources (2017) 0.02
    0.0219043 = product of:
      0.0438086 = sum of:
        0.01914278 = weight(_text_:library in 3688) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.01914278 = score(doc=3688,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1317883 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050121464 = queryNorm
            0.14525402 = fieldWeight in 3688, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3688)
        0.024665821 = product of:
          0.049331643 = sum of:
            0.049331643 = weight(_text_:project in 3688) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.049331643 = score(doc=3688,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.21156175 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.220981 = idf(docFreq=1764, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050121464 = queryNorm
                0.23317845 = fieldWeight in 3688, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.220981 = idf(docFreq=1764, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3688)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    The purpose of this research was to establish an upper bound on finding answers to health-related questions in MedlinePlus and other online resources. Seven reference librarians tested a set of protocols to determine whether it was possible to use the types and foci of the questions extracted from customer requests submitted to the National Library of Medicine to find authoritative answers to these questions. Librarians tested the protocols manually to determine if the process was sufficiently robust and accurate to later automate. Results indicated that the extracted terms provide enough information to find authoritative answers for about 60% of questions and that certain question types are more likely to result in authoritative answers than others. The question corpus and analysis performed for this project will inform automatic question answering systems, and could lead to suggestions for new content to include in MedlinePlus. This approach can serve as an example to researchers interested in methods of evaluating question answering tools and the contents of online databases.
  4. Martínez-Ávila, D.; Chaves Guimarães, J.A.; Pinho, F.A.; Fox, M.J.: ¬The representation of ethics and knowledge organization in the WoS and LISTA databases (2015) 0.02
    0.021671817 = product of:
      0.043343633 = sum of:
        0.022971334 = weight(_text_:library in 2358) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.022971334 = score(doc=2358,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1317883 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050121464 = queryNorm
            0.17430481 = fieldWeight in 2358, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2358)
        0.0203723 = product of:
          0.0407446 = sum of:
            0.0407446 = weight(_text_:22 in 2358) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0407446 = score(doc=2358,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17551683 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050121464 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2358, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2358)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    A naïve user seeking introductory information on a topic may perceive a domain as it is shown by the search results in a database; however, inconsistencies in indexing can misrepresent the full picture of the domain by including irrelevant documents or omitting relevant ones, sometimes inexplicably. A bibliometric analysis was conducted on the domain of ethics in knowledge organization in the World of Science (WoS) and Library, Information Science & Technology Abstracts (LISTA) databases to discern how it is being presented by search results in those databases and to attempt to determine why inconsistencies occurred.
    Date
    17. 2.2018 16:50:22
  5. Luyt, B.: Wikipedia, collective memory, and the Vietnam war (2016) 0.02
    0.015078641 = product of:
      0.060314562 = sum of:
        0.060314562 = weight(_text_:digital in 3054) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.060314562 = score(doc=3054,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.19770671 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050121464 = queryNorm
            0.30507088 = fieldWeight in 3054, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3054)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    Wikipedia is increasingly an important source of information for many. Hence, it is important to develop an understanding of how it is situated within society and the wider roles it is called onto perform. This article argues that one of these roles is as a depository of collective memory. Building on the work of Pentzold, I present a case study of the English Wikipedia article on the Vietnam War to demonstrate that the article, or more accurately, its talk pages, provide a forum for the contestation of collective memory. I further argue that this function is one that should be supported by libraries as they position themselves within a rapidly changing digital world.
  6. Geyer, S.: ¬Die Klugschreiber : Michael König und Martin Zeise sind deutsche Wikipedia-Autoren der ersten Stunde (2010) 0.01
    0.0064622746 = product of:
      0.025849098 = sum of:
        0.025849098 = weight(_text_:digital in 4179) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.025849098 = score(doc=4179,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.19770671 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050121464 = queryNorm
            0.13074467 = fieldWeight in 4179, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=4179)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Footnote
    Vgl. unter: http://www.fr-online.de/digital/die-klugschreiber/-/1472406/5638578/-/index.html.
  7. Beuth, P.: Prophet und Profiteur : Jimmy Wales' Idee entwickelte ein Eigenleben (2010) 0.01
    0.0064622746 = product of:
      0.025849098 = sum of:
        0.025849098 = weight(_text_:digital in 4338) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.025849098 = score(doc=4338,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.19770671 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050121464 = queryNorm
            0.13074467 = fieldWeight in 4338, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=4338)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Footnote
    Vgl. unter: http://www.fr-online.de/digital/vom-profiteur-zum-propheten/-/1472406/5541336/-/index.html.
  8. Moll, S.: ¬Ein Tag ohne Weltwissen : In den USA wurden als Protest gegen ein geplantes Gesetz Recherche-Seiten lahmgelegt (2012) 0.01
    0.0064622746 = product of:
      0.025849098 = sum of:
        0.025849098 = weight(_text_:digital in 4883) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.025849098 = score(doc=4883,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.19770671 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050121464 = queryNorm
            0.13074467 = fieldWeight in 4883, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=4883)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Footnote
    Vgl. auch den Leitartikel in derselben Ausgabe: Thomas, C.: Blackout (S.13). Vgl.: http://www.fr-online.de/digital/internet-protest-in-den-usa-ein-tag-ohne-weltwissen,1472406,11472830.html.
  9. Schumann, L.; Stock, W.G.: ¬Ein umfassendes ganzheitliches Modell für Evaluation und Akzeptanzanalysen von Informationsdiensten : Das Information Service Evaluation (ISE) Modell (2014) 0.01
    0.0059419204 = product of:
      0.023767682 = sum of:
        0.023767682 = product of:
          0.047535364 = sum of:
            0.047535364 = weight(_text_:22 in 1492) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.047535364 = score(doc=1492,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17551683 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050121464 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 1492, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1492)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Date
    22. 9.2014 18:56:46
  10. Hildebrandt, J.; Beuth, P.: Macht Wikipedia schlau oder dumm? : die FR gibt Orientierungshilfen in der grenzenlosen Fundgrube (2010) 0.01
    0.0053852284 = product of:
      0.021540914 = sum of:
        0.021540914 = weight(_text_:digital in 4180) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.021540914 = score(doc=4180,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.19770671 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050121464 = queryNorm
            0.10895388 = fieldWeight in 4180, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
              0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=4180)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Footnote
    Vgl. unter: http://www.fr-online.de/digital/grosser-wurf-oder-grosser-mist-/-/1472406/5539824/-/index.html.
  11. Hartmann, B.: Ab ins MoMA : zum virtuellen Museumsgang (2011) 0.01
    0.005093075 = product of:
      0.0203723 = sum of:
        0.0203723 = product of:
          0.0407446 = sum of:
            0.0407446 = weight(_text_:22 in 1821) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0407446 = score(doc=1821,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17551683 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050121464 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1821, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1821)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Date
    3. 5.1997 8:44:22
  12. Cho, H.; Chen, M.-H.; Chung, S.: Testing an integrative theoretical model of knowledge-sharing behavior in the context of Wikipedia (2010) 0.01
    0.005093075 = product of:
      0.0203723 = sum of:
        0.0203723 = product of:
          0.0407446 = sum of:
            0.0407446 = weight(_text_:22 in 3460) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0407446 = score(doc=3460,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17551683 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050121464 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3460, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3460)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Date
    1. 6.2010 10:13:22
  13. Kohn, R.S.: Of Descartes and of train schedules : Evaluating the Encyclopedia Judaica, Wikipedia, and other general and Jewish Studies encyclopedias (2010) 0.00
    0.004785695 = product of:
      0.01914278 = sum of:
        0.01914278 = weight(_text_:library in 3633) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.01914278 = score(doc=3633,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1317883 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050121464 = queryNorm
            0.14525402 = fieldWeight in 3633, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3633)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    Library review. 59(2010) no.4, S.249-260
  14. Höhn, S.: Stalins Badezimmer in Wikipedia : Die Macher der Internet-Enzyklopädie diskutieren über Verantwortung und Transparenz. Der Brockhaus kehrt dagegen zur gedruckten Ausgabe zurück. (2012) 0.00
    0.0030011232 = product of:
      0.012004493 = sum of:
        0.012004493 = product of:
          0.024008986 = sum of:
            0.024008986 = weight(_text_:22 in 2171) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.024008986 = score(doc=2171,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.17551683 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050121464 = queryNorm
                0.13679022 = fieldWeight in 2171, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=2171)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Content
    Der neue Herausgeber des Brockhaus, ein Tochterverlag von Bertelsmann, hat unterdessen angekündigt, zum gedruckten Lexikon zurückzukehren. Etwa Anfang 2015 soll die 22. Auflage erscheinen. In Zeiten des virtuellen Informationsoverkills gebe es einen Bedarf an Orientierung, an Relevanzvorgaben, sagt Geschäftsführer Christoph Hünermann. Ausgerechnet Bertelsmann druckte 2008 ein knapp 1 000 Seiten langes Wikipedia-Lexikon mit den 50 000 meist gesuchten Begriffen. Eine Experten-Redaktion überprüfte die Einträge sicherheitshalber zuvor - soll allerdings kaum Fehler gefunden haben."
    Source
    Frankfurter Rundschau. Nr.76 vom 29.3.2012, S.22-23
  15. Haubner, S.: "Als einfacher Benutzer ist man rechtlos" : Unter den freiwilligen Wikipedia-Mitarbeitern regt sich Unmut über die Administratoren (2011) 0.00
    0.0021221146 = product of:
      0.008488459 = sum of:
        0.008488459 = product of:
          0.016976917 = sum of:
            0.016976917 = weight(_text_:22 in 4567) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.016976917 = score(doc=4567,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17551683 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050121464 = queryNorm
                0.09672529 = fieldWeight in 4567, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=4567)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Date
    3. 5.1997 8:44:22