-
Chen, H.; Zhang, Y.; Houston, A.L.: Semantic indexing and searching using a Hopfield net (1998)
0.05
0.046705756 = product of:
0.09341151 = sum of:
0.09341151 = product of:
0.18682303 = sum of:
0.18682303 = weight(_text_:memory in 5704) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.18682303 = score(doc=5704,freq=4.0), product of:
0.31615055 = queryWeight, product of:
6.30326 = idf(docFreq=219, maxDocs=44218)
0.050156675 = queryNorm
0.5909306 = fieldWeight in 5704, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
6.30326 = idf(docFreq=219, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5704)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Presents a neural network approach to document semantic indexing. Reports results of a study to apply a Hopfield net algorithm to simulate human associative memory for concept exploration in the domain of computer science and engineering. The INSPEC database, consisting of 320.000 abstracts from leading periodical articles was used as the document test bed. Benchmark tests conformed that 3 parameters: maximum number of activated nodes; maximum allowable error; and maximum number of iterations; were useful in positively influencing network convergence behaviour without negatively impacting central processing unit performance. Another series of benchmark tests was performed to determine the effectiveness of various filtering techniques in reducing the negative impact of noisy input terms. Preliminary user tests conformed expectations that the Hopfield net is potentially useful as an associative memory technique to improve document recall and precision by solving discrepancies between indexer vocabularies and end user vocabularies
-
Heinz, S.; Zobel, J.: Efficient single-pass index construction for text databases (2003)
0.04
0.038530283 = product of:
0.077060565 = sum of:
0.077060565 = product of:
0.15412113 = sum of:
0.15412113 = weight(_text_:memory in 1678) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.15412113 = score(doc=1678,freq=2.0), product of:
0.31615055 = queryWeight, product of:
6.30326 = idf(docFreq=219, maxDocs=44218)
0.050156675 = queryNorm
0.48749286 = fieldWeight in 1678, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
6.30326 = idf(docFreq=219, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1678)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Efficient construction of inverted indexes is essential to provision of search over large collections of text data. In this article, we review the principal approaches to inversion, analyze their theoretical cost, and present experimental results. We identify the drawbacks of existing inversion approaches and propose a single-pass inversion method that, in contrast to previous approaches, does not require the complete vocabulary of the indexed collection in main memory, can operate within limited resources, and does not sacrifice speed with high temporary storage requirements. We show that the performance of the single-pass approach can be improved by constructing inverted files in segments, reducing the cost of disk accesses during inversion of large volumes of data.
-
Moffat, A.; Bell, T.A.H.: In situ generation of compressed inverted files (1995)
0.03
0.033025958 = product of:
0.066051915 = sum of:
0.066051915 = product of:
0.13210383 = sum of:
0.13210383 = weight(_text_:memory in 2648) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.13210383 = score(doc=2648,freq=2.0), product of:
0.31615055 = queryWeight, product of:
6.30326 = idf(docFreq=219, maxDocs=44218)
0.050156675 = queryNorm
0.41785103 = fieldWeight in 2648, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
6.30326 = idf(docFreq=219, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2648)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- An inverted index stores, for each term that appears in a collection of documents, a list of document numbers containing that term. Such an index is indispensible when Boolean or informal ranked queries are to be answered. Construction of the index ist, however, a non trivial task. Simple methods using in.memory data structures cannot be used for large collections because they require too much random access storage, and traditional disc based methods require large amounts of temporary file space. Describes a new indexing algorithm designed to create large compressed inverted indexes in situ. It makes use of simple compression codes for the positive integers and an in place external multi way merge sort. The new techniques has been used to invert a 2-gigabyte text collection in under 4 hours, using less than 40 megabytes of temporary disc space, and less than 20 megabytes of main memory
-
Hoenkamp, E.: Unitary operators on the document space (2003)
0.03
0.02752163 = product of:
0.05504326 = sum of:
0.05504326 = product of:
0.11008652 = sum of:
0.11008652 = weight(_text_:memory in 3457) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.11008652 = score(doc=3457,freq=2.0), product of:
0.31615055 = queryWeight, product of:
6.30326 = idf(docFreq=219, maxDocs=44218)
0.050156675 = queryNorm
0.34820917 = fieldWeight in 3457, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
6.30326 = idf(docFreq=219, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3457)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- When people search for documents, they eventually want content, not words. Hence, search engines should relate documents more by their underlying concepts than by the words they contain. One promising technique to do so is Latent Semantic Indexing (LSI). LSI dramatically reduces the dimension of the document space by mapping it into a space spanned by conceptual indices. Empirically, the number of concepts that can represent the documents are far fewer than the great variety of words in the textual representation. Although this almost obviates the problem of lexical matching, the mapping incurs a high computational cost compared to document parsing, indexing, query matching, and updating. This article accomplishes several things. First, it shows how the technique underlying LSI is just one example of a unitary operator, for which there are computationally more attractive alternatives. Second, it proposes the Haar transform as such an alternative, as it is memory efficient, and can be computed in linear to sublinear time. Third, it generalizes LSI by a multiresolution representation of the document space. The approach not only preserves the advantages of LSI at drastically reduced computational costs, it also opens a spectrum of possibilities for new research.
-
Voorhees, E.M.: Implementing agglomerative hierarchic clustering algorithms for use in document retrieval (1986)
0.03
0.027182149 = product of:
0.054364298 = sum of:
0.054364298 = product of:
0.108728595 = sum of:
0.108728595 = weight(_text_:22 in 402) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.108728595 = score(doc=402,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17564014 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.050156675 = queryNorm
0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 402, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=402)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Information processing and management. 22(1986) no.6, S.465-476
-
Smeaton, A.F.; Rijsbergen, C.J. van: ¬The retrieval effects of query expansion on a feedback document retrieval system (1983)
0.02
0.02378438 = product of:
0.04756876 = sum of:
0.04756876 = product of:
0.09513752 = sum of:
0.09513752 = weight(_text_:22 in 2134) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09513752 = score(doc=2134,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17564014 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.050156675 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 2134, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=2134)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 30. 3.2001 13:32:22
-
Back, J.: ¬An evaluation of relevancy ranking techniques used by Internet search engines (2000)
0.02
0.02378438 = product of:
0.04756876 = sum of:
0.04756876 = product of:
0.09513752 = sum of:
0.09513752 = weight(_text_:22 in 3445) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09513752 = score(doc=3445,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17564014 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.050156675 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 3445, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3445)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 25. 8.2005 17:42:22
-
Fuhr, N.: Ranking-Experimente mit gewichteter Indexierung (1986)
0.02
0.020386612 = product of:
0.040773224 = sum of:
0.040773224 = product of:
0.08154645 = sum of:
0.08154645 = weight(_text_:22 in 58) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08154645 = score(doc=58,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17564014 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.050156675 = queryNorm
0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 58, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=58)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 14. 6.2015 22:12:44
-
Fuhr, N.: Rankingexperimente mit gewichteter Indexierung (1986)
0.02
0.020386612 = product of:
0.040773224 = sum of:
0.040773224 = product of:
0.08154645 = sum of:
0.08154645 = weight(_text_:22 in 2051) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08154645 = score(doc=2051,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17564014 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.050156675 = queryNorm
0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 2051, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2051)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 14. 6.2015 22:12:56
-
MacFarlane, A.; Robertson, S.E.; McCann, J.A.: Parallel computing for passage retrieval (2004)
0.01
0.013591074 = product of:
0.027182149 = sum of:
0.027182149 = product of:
0.054364298 = sum of:
0.054364298 = weight(_text_:22 in 5108) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.054364298 = score(doc=5108,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17564014 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.050156675 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 5108, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5108)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 20. 1.2007 18:30:22
-
Faloutsos, C.: Signature files (1992)
0.01
0.013591074 = product of:
0.027182149 = sum of:
0.027182149 = product of:
0.054364298 = sum of:
0.054364298 = weight(_text_:22 in 3499) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.054364298 = score(doc=3499,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17564014 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.050156675 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3499, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3499)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 7. 5.1999 15:22:48
-
Losada, D.E.; Barreiro, A.: Emebedding term similarity and inverse document frequency into a logical model of information retrieval (2003)
0.01
0.013591074 = product of:
0.027182149 = sum of:
0.027182149 = product of:
0.054364298 = sum of:
0.054364298 = weight(_text_:22 in 1422) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.054364298 = score(doc=1422,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17564014 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.050156675 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1422, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1422)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 3.2003 19:27:23
-
Bornmann, L.; Mutz, R.: From P100 to P100' : a new citation-rank approach (2014)
0.01
0.013591074 = product of:
0.027182149 = sum of:
0.027182149 = product of:
0.054364298 = sum of:
0.054364298 = weight(_text_:22 in 1431) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.054364298 = score(doc=1431,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17564014 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.050156675 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1431, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1431)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 8.2014 17:05:18
-
Tober, M.; Hennig, L.; Furch, D.: SEO Ranking-Faktoren und Rang-Korrelationen 2014 : Google Deutschland (2014)
0.01
0.013591074 = product of:
0.027182149 = sum of:
0.027182149 = product of:
0.054364298 = sum of:
0.054364298 = weight(_text_:22 in 1484) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.054364298 = score(doc=1484,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17564014 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.050156675 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1484, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1484)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 13. 9.2014 14:45:22
-
Ravana, S.D.; Rajagopal, P.; Balakrishnan, V.: Ranking retrieval systems using pseudo relevance judgments (2015)
0.01
0.012012926 = product of:
0.024025852 = sum of:
0.024025852 = product of:
0.048051704 = sum of:
0.048051704 = weight(_text_:22 in 2591) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.048051704 = score(doc=2591,freq=4.0), product of:
0.17564014 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.050156675 = queryNorm
0.27358043 = fieldWeight in 2591, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2591)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 20. 1.2015 18:30:22
18. 9.2018 18:22:56
-
Chang, C.-H.; Hsu, C.-C.: Integrating query expansion and conceptual relevance feedback for personalized Web information retrieval (1998)
0.01
0.01189219 = product of:
0.02378438 = sum of:
0.02378438 = product of:
0.04756876 = sum of:
0.04756876 = weight(_text_:22 in 1319) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04756876 = score(doc=1319,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17564014 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.050156675 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 1319, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1319)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 1. 8.1996 22:08:06
-
Kanaeva, Z.: Ranking: Google und CiteSeer (2005)
0.01
0.01189219 = product of:
0.02378438 = sum of:
0.02378438 = product of:
0.04756876 = sum of:
0.04756876 = weight(_text_:22 in 3276) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04756876 = score(doc=3276,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17564014 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.050156675 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 3276, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3276)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 20. 3.2005 16:23:22
-
Joss, M.W.; Wszola, S.: ¬The engines that can : text search and retrieval software, their strategies, and vendors (1996)
0.01
0.010193306 = product of:
0.020386612 = sum of:
0.020386612 = product of:
0.040773224 = sum of:
0.040773224 = weight(_text_:22 in 5123) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.040773224 = score(doc=5123,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17564014 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.050156675 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 5123, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5123)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 12. 9.1996 13:56:22
-
Kelledy, F.; Smeaton, A.F.: Signature files and beyond (1996)
0.01
0.010193306 = product of:
0.020386612 = sum of:
0.020386612 = product of:
0.040773224 = sum of:
0.040773224 = weight(_text_:22 in 6973) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.040773224 = score(doc=6973,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17564014 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.050156675 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 6973, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=6973)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Information retrieval: new systems and current research. Proceedings of the 16th Research Colloquium of the British Computer Society Information Retrieval Specialist Group, Drymen, Scotland, 22-23 Mar 94. Ed.: R. Leon
-
Crestani, F.; Dominich, S.; Lalmas, M.; Rijsbergen, C.J.K. van: Mathematical, logical, and formal methods in information retrieval : an introduction to the special issue (2003)
0.01
0.010193306 = product of:
0.020386612 = sum of:
0.020386612 = product of:
0.040773224 = sum of:
0.040773224 = weight(_text_:22 in 1451) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.040773224 = score(doc=1451,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17564014 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.050156675 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1451, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1451)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 3.2003 19:27:36
