Search (1276 results, page 1 of 64)

  • × theme_ss:"Formalerschließung"
  1. Jones, E.: ¬The FRBR model as applied to continuing resources (2005) 0.04
    0.044316597 = product of:
      0.06647489 = sum of:
        0.023283537 = weight(_text_:to in 2900) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.023283537 = score(doc=2900,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08279609 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.818051 = idf(docFreq=19512, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045541126 = queryNorm
            0.28121543 = fieldWeight in 2900, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.818051 = idf(docFreq=19512, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=2900)
        0.043191355 = product of:
          0.08638271 = sum of:
            0.08638271 = weight(_text_:22 in 2900) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08638271 = score(doc=2900,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15947726 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045541126 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 2900, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=2900)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  2. Hirons, J.; Hawkins, L.; French, P.: AACR2 and you : revisiting AACR2 to accomodate seriality (2000) 0.04
    0.044316597 = product of:
      0.06647489 = sum of:
        0.023283537 = weight(_text_:to in 6339) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.023283537 = score(doc=6339,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08279609 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.818051 = idf(docFreq=19512, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045541126 = queryNorm
            0.28121543 = fieldWeight in 6339, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.818051 = idf(docFreq=19512, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6339)
        0.043191355 = product of:
          0.08638271 = sum of:
            0.08638271 = weight(_text_:22 in 6339) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08638271 = score(doc=6339,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15947726 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045541126 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 6339, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6339)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Date
    18. 8.2002 17:22:13
  3. Burrows, T.: ¬The virtual catalogue : bibliographic access for the virtual library (1993) 0.04
    0.038180627 = product of:
      0.057270937 = sum of:
        0.032590162 = weight(_text_:to in 5286) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.032590162 = score(doc=5286,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.08279609 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.818051 = idf(docFreq=19512, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045541126 = queryNorm
            0.39361957 = fieldWeight in 5286, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              1.818051 = idf(docFreq=19512, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5286)
        0.024680775 = product of:
          0.04936155 = sum of:
            0.04936155 = weight(_text_:22 in 5286) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04936155 = score(doc=5286,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15947726 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045541126 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 5286, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5286)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    Proposes a new model for bibliographic access, the virtual catalogue, to serve the virtual library. Suggests the use of current software and networks to build links between bibliographic databases of all kinds, including full text, to enable the user to search a specified subset of databases. Suggests that local data be limited to holdings information linked to, but separate from, bibliographic databases both local and remote
    Date
    8.10.2000 14:47:22
  4. Morris, V.: Automated language identification of bibliographic resources (2020) 0.04
    0.038180627 = product of:
      0.057270937 = sum of:
        0.032590162 = weight(_text_:to in 5749) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.032590162 = score(doc=5749,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.08279609 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.818051 = idf(docFreq=19512, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045541126 = queryNorm
            0.39361957 = fieldWeight in 5749, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              1.818051 = idf(docFreq=19512, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5749)
        0.024680775 = product of:
          0.04936155 = sum of:
            0.04936155 = weight(_text_:22 in 5749) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04936155 = score(doc=5749,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15947726 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045541126 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 5749, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5749)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    This article describes experiments in the use of machine learning techniques at the British Library to assign language codes to catalog records, in order to provide information about the language of content of the resources described. In the first phase of the project, language codes were assigned to 1.15 million records with 99.7% confidence. The automated language identification tools developed will be used to contribute to future enhancement of over 4 million legacy records.
    Date
    2. 3.2020 19:04:22
  5. Bourdon, F.: Functional requirements and numbering of authority records (FRANAR) : to what extent can authority control be supported by technical means? (2002) 0.04
    0.037985653 = product of:
      0.05697848 = sum of:
        0.019957317 = weight(_text_:to in 3929) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.019957317 = score(doc=3929,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08279609 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.818051 = idf(docFreq=19512, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045541126 = queryNorm
            0.24104178 = fieldWeight in 3929, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.818051 = idf(docFreq=19512, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3929)
        0.037021164 = product of:
          0.07404233 = sum of:
            0.07404233 = weight(_text_:22 in 3929) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07404233 = score(doc=3929,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15947726 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045541126 = queryNorm
                0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 3929, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3929)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Date
    30. 8.2005 9:22:54
  6. Gray, B.: Cataloging the special collections of Allegheny college (2005) 0.04
    0.037680656 = product of:
      0.056520984 = sum of:
        0.034925304 = weight(_text_:to in 127) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.034925304 = score(doc=127,freq=18.0), product of:
            0.08279609 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.818051 = idf(docFreq=19512, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045541126 = queryNorm
            0.4218231 = fieldWeight in 127, product of:
              4.2426405 = tf(freq=18.0), with freq of:
                18.0 = termFreq=18.0
              1.818051 = idf(docFreq=19512, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=127)
        0.021595677 = product of:
          0.043191355 = sum of:
            0.043191355 = weight(_text_:22 in 127) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.043191355 = score(doc=127,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15947726 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045541126 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 127, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=127)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    Scholars have long noted the significance of Allegheny College's special collections to American cultural and educational history. Special collections have value to colleges and universities as publicity devices to draw scholars, students, and funding to the institution. Catalogers have an important role to play in marketing the library and the college through improved bibliographic access to these collections. Rare book and manuscript cataloging presents many challenges to catalogers, especially at smaller institutions. This report traces the evolution of Allegheny College's catalog, from book format in 1823, through card format, and finally to online. It also explores the bibliographic challenges created as the library moved from one format to another.
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  7. Struble, C.A.; Kohberger, P.B.: Statistical survey to determine availability of cataloging copy on OCLC (1987) 0.04
    0.03628759 = product of:
      0.054431386 = sum of:
        0.029750613 = weight(_text_:to in 358) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.029750613 = score(doc=358,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.08279609 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.818051 = idf(docFreq=19512, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045541126 = queryNorm
            0.3593239 = fieldWeight in 358, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              1.818051 = idf(docFreq=19512, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=358)
        0.024680775 = product of:
          0.04936155 = sum of:
            0.04936155 = weight(_text_:22 in 358) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04936155 = score(doc=358,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15947726 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045541126 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 358, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=358)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    This paper reports the results of a year-long survey conducted at the University of Pittsburgh (Pitt) to determine what level of cataloging copy (Library of Congress, member input, or none) is present on OCLC at the time an item is received in Technical Services and after a six-month waiting period. These results were used to divert selected monographs from the normal workflow in order to expedite their cataloging and to release needed shelf space for other items.
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 7(1987) no.3, S.13-22
  8. Seymour, C.: Cataloging Internet resources (1996) 0.04
    0.036247265 = product of:
      0.054370895 = sum of:
        0.023519924 = weight(_text_:to in 4679) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.023519924 = score(doc=4679,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.08279609 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.818051 = idf(docFreq=19512, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045541126 = queryNorm
            0.28407046 = fieldWeight in 4679, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.818051 = idf(docFreq=19512, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4679)
        0.03085097 = product of:
          0.06170194 = sum of:
            0.06170194 = weight(_text_:22 in 4679) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06170194 = score(doc=4679,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15947726 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045541126 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 4679, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4679)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    Describes the OCLC project for cataloguing Internet resources, a project aimed at developing rules for electronic material, and as a possible solution for the difficulty of locating materials on the Internet. No attempts is made to catalogue all the resources on the Internet and choice of materials is left to participating libraries
    Source
    Information and librarianship. 22(1996) no.1, S.33-35
  9. Brunt, R.: Old rules for a new game : Cutter revisited (1998) 0.03
    0.03493127 = product of:
      0.0523969 = sum of:
        0.030801224 = weight(_text_:to in 771) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.030801224 = score(doc=771,freq=14.0), product of:
            0.08279609 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.818051 = idf(docFreq=19512, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045541126 = queryNorm
            0.37201303 = fieldWeight in 771, product of:
              3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
                14.0 = termFreq=14.0
              1.818051 = idf(docFreq=19512, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=771)
        0.021595677 = product of:
          0.043191355 = sum of:
            0.043191355 = weight(_text_:22 in 771) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.043191355 = score(doc=771,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15947726 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045541126 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 771, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=771)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    It is contended that while there are considerable numbers of people interested in the application of information retrieval (IR) software on their home computers in their professional, working and recreational activities, they are not very well served in using it to best advantage. Describes the writer's attempts to transfer some of the recorded good practice of the first information managers to contemporary problems. Data input standards devoted to library organisation may be developed to establish a set of principles to encourage the consistent organisation of the entire range of objects which might be represented in databases. Specific areas of difficulty are examined.
    Date
    24. 1.2007 19:38:22
    Footnote
    Festschrift article to mark the retirement of Douglas Anderson from 24 years at the School of Information and Media, Robert Gordon University, Aberdeen, Scotland
  10. Aalberg, T.; Haugen, F.B.; Husby, O.: ¬A Tool for Converting from MARC to FRBR (2006) 0.03
    0.03493127 = product of:
      0.0523969 = sum of:
        0.030801224 = weight(_text_:to in 2425) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.030801224 = score(doc=2425,freq=14.0), product of:
            0.08279609 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.818051 = idf(docFreq=19512, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045541126 = queryNorm
            0.37201303 = fieldWeight in 2425, product of:
              3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
                14.0 = termFreq=14.0
              1.818051 = idf(docFreq=19512, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2425)
        0.021595677 = product of:
          0.043191355 = sum of:
            0.043191355 = weight(_text_:22 in 2425) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.043191355 = score(doc=2425,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15947726 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045541126 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2425, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2425)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    The FRBR model is by many considered to be an important contribution to the next generation of bibliographic catalogues, but a major challenge for the library community is how to use this model on already existing MARC-based bibliographic catalogues. This problem requires a solution for the interpretation and conversion of MARC records, and a tool for this kind of conversion is developed as a part of the Norwegian BIBSYS FRBR project. The tool is based on a systematic approach to the interpretation and conversion process and is designed to be adaptable to the rules applied in different catalogues.
    Source
    Research and advanced technology for digital libraries : 10th European conference, proceedings / ECDL 2006, Alicante, Spain, September 17 - 22, 2006
  11. Knowlton, S.A.: Power and change in the US cataloging community (2014) 0.03
    0.03493127 = product of:
      0.0523969 = sum of:
        0.030801224 = weight(_text_:to in 2599) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.030801224 = score(doc=2599,freq=14.0), product of:
            0.08279609 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.818051 = idf(docFreq=19512, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045541126 = queryNorm
            0.37201303 = fieldWeight in 2599, product of:
              3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
                14.0 = termFreq=14.0
              1.818051 = idf(docFreq=19512, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2599)
        0.021595677 = product of:
          0.043191355 = sum of:
            0.043191355 = weight(_text_:22 in 2599) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.043191355 = score(doc=2599,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15947726 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045541126 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2599, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2599)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    The US cataloging community is an interorganizational network with the Library of Congress (LC) as the lead organization, which reserves to itself the power to shape cataloging rules. Peripheral members of the network who are interested in modifying changes to the rules or to the network can use various strategies for organizational change that incorporate building ties to the decision-makers located at the hub of the network. The story of William E. Studwell's campaign for a subject heading code illustrates how some traditional scholarly methods of urging change-papers and presentations-are insufficient to achieve reform in an interorganizational network, absent strategies to build alliances with the decision makers.
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  12. Cochenour, D.: Linking remote users and information : cataloguing Internet publications (1994) 0.03
    0.034193687 = product of:
      0.05129053 = sum of:
        0.026609756 = weight(_text_:to in 2170) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.026609756 = score(doc=2170,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.08279609 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.818051 = idf(docFreq=19512, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045541126 = queryNorm
            0.32138905 = fieldWeight in 2170, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              1.818051 = idf(docFreq=19512, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2170)
        0.024680775 = product of:
          0.04936155 = sum of:
            0.04936155 = weight(_text_:22 in 2170) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04936155 = score(doc=2170,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15947726 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045541126 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2170, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2170)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    Libraries can add value to Internet resources by adding them to the library's catalogue in a manner consistent with the other resources held within the collection. Reports on OCLC studies into cataloguing Internet resources and accessing electronic periodicals. Existing retrieval methods on the Internet are limited because of shallow directory structures and idiosyncratic naming conventions. Catalogue entries for electronic resources need to provide a complete description of the access methodology if they are to satisfactorily connect remote users without the immediate possibility of backup from reference staff
    Date
    17.10.1995 18:22:54
  13. Lee, E.: Cataloguing (and reference) at the crossroads (1996) 0.03
    0.034193687 = product of:
      0.05129053 = sum of:
        0.026609756 = weight(_text_:to in 499) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.026609756 = score(doc=499,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.08279609 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.818051 = idf(docFreq=19512, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045541126 = queryNorm
            0.32138905 = fieldWeight in 499, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              1.818051 = idf(docFreq=19512, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=499)
        0.024680775 = product of:
          0.04936155 = sum of:
            0.04936155 = weight(_text_:22 in 499) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04936155 = score(doc=499,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15947726 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045541126 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 499, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=499)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    Alerts librarians to directions in research in artificial intelligence relevant to information retrieval which will change current technology and user expectations and consequently the requirements for data provision and access at the base level. Predicts a reevaluation of priorities for using the expertise of cataloguers (and reference librarians) and of cataloguing methodologies. Debates the future of cataloguing, arguing for the need to monitor developments in adjacent research areas and to plan with these in mind
    Source
    Cataloguing Australia. 22(1996) nos.3/4, S.68-75
  14. Coyle, K.: Future considerations : the functional library systems record (2004) 0.03
    0.034193687 = product of:
      0.05129053 = sum of:
        0.026609756 = weight(_text_:to in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.026609756 = score(doc=562,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.08279609 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.818051 = idf(docFreq=19512, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045541126 = queryNorm
            0.32138905 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              1.818051 = idf(docFreq=19512, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
        0.024680775 = product of:
          0.04936155 = sum of:
            0.04936155 = weight(_text_:22 in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04936155 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15947726 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045541126 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    The paper performs a thought experiment on the concept of a record based on the Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records and library system functions, and concludes that if we want to develop a functional bibliographic record we need to do it within the context of a flexible, functional library systems record structure. The article suggests a new way to look at the library systems record that would allow libraries to move forward in terms of technology but also in terms of serving library users.
    Source
    Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.2, S.166-174
  15. Haynes, K.J.M.; Saye, J.D.; Kaid, L.L.: Cataloging collection-level records for archival video and audio recordings (1993) 0.03
    0.033408046 = product of:
      0.05011207 = sum of:
        0.028516391 = weight(_text_:to in 584) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.028516391 = score(doc=584,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.08279609 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.818051 = idf(docFreq=19512, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045541126 = queryNorm
            0.34441712 = fieldWeight in 584, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              1.818051 = idf(docFreq=19512, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=584)
        0.021595677 = product of:
          0.043191355 = sum of:
            0.043191355 = weight(_text_:22 in 584) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.043191355 = score(doc=584,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15947726 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045541126 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 584, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=584)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    Describes a project to create a bibliographic control system for archival quality video and audio recordings of political commercials. The project objectives were: to design a local computer searchable database; prepare item level records for the local database; and prepare collection level records for the OCLC Online Union Catalog. The collection level records are intended to alert scholars, researchers, and other potential users to the existence of the archive and to direct them to it for more powerful item level searching in the local database. Some of the cataloguing problems discussed are: choice of cataloguing tools and MARC formats; organization of the collections around the political candidate, and name authority
    Date
    12. 1.2007 14:43:22
  16. Bloss, M.E.: Testing RDA at Dominican University's Graduate School of Library and Information Science : the students' perspectives (2011) 0.03
    0.033408046 = product of:
      0.05011207 = sum of:
        0.028516391 = weight(_text_:to in 1899) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.028516391 = score(doc=1899,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.08279609 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.818051 = idf(docFreq=19512, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045541126 = queryNorm
            0.34441712 = fieldWeight in 1899, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              1.818051 = idf(docFreq=19512, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1899)
        0.021595677 = product of:
          0.043191355 = sum of:
            0.043191355 = weight(_text_:22 in 1899) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.043191355 = score(doc=1899,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15947726 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045541126 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 1899, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1899)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    Dominican University's Graduate School of Library and Information Science (GSLIS) was one of a funnel group of graduate schools of library and information science selected to test RDA. A seminar specifically for this purpose was conducted from August to December 2010. Fifteen students participated in the test, creating records in AACR2 and in RDA, encoding them in the MARC format, and responding to the required questionnaires. In addition to record creation, the students were also asked to submit a final paper in which they described their experiences and recommended whether or not to accept RDA as a replacement for AACR2.
    Date
    25. 5.2015 18:36:22
  17. Theimer, S.: ¬A cataloger's resolution to become more creative : how and why (2012) 0.03
    0.033408046 = product of:
      0.05011207 = sum of:
        0.028516391 = weight(_text_:to in 1934) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.028516391 = score(doc=1934,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.08279609 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.818051 = idf(docFreq=19512, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045541126 = queryNorm
            0.34441712 = fieldWeight in 1934, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              1.818051 = idf(docFreq=19512, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1934)
        0.021595677 = product of:
          0.043191355 = sum of:
            0.043191355 = weight(_text_:22 in 1934) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.043191355 = score(doc=1934,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15947726 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045541126 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 1934, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1934)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    Creativity is now a core requirement for successful organizations. Libraries, like all organizations, need to produce and utilize new ideas to improve user service and experiences. With changes in cataloging such as Resource Description and Access (RDA), the opportunity to rethink cataloging practices is here now. Everyone has creative potential, although catalogers may have both a personality and work environment that make it more difficult. To be able to maximize creative capacity, catalogers need the proper work environment, support from their organization, and a plan for accomplishing creative goals. Given that environment, catalogers may create ideas that will shape the future. (RDA).
    Date
    29. 5.2015 11:08:22
  18. Pappas, E.: ¬An analysis of eight RLIN-members' authority controlled access points for purposes of speeding copy cataloging work flow (1996) 0.03
    0.032297708 = product of:
      0.04844656 = sum of:
        0.029935975 = weight(_text_:to in 5530) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.029935975 = score(doc=5530,freq=18.0), product of:
            0.08279609 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.818051 = idf(docFreq=19512, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045541126 = queryNorm
            0.36156267 = fieldWeight in 5530, product of:
              4.2426405 = tf(freq=18.0), with freq of:
                18.0 = termFreq=18.0
              1.818051 = idf(docFreq=19512, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5530)
        0.018510582 = product of:
          0.037021164 = sum of:
            0.037021164 = weight(_text_:22 in 5530) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.037021164 = score(doc=5530,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15947726 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045541126 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 5530, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5530)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    The authority controlled headings in a random sample of cataloguing records from RLIN member libraries were examined to determine the extent to which they either matched the forms a sestablished in RLIN's online authority files or, in cases where no headings existed in the files, had been formulated according to AACR2R principles and LoC guidelines. The study analzed all of the authority controlled access points in the records sample to determine the extent to ehich these access points matched the LoC Name Authority File (LoC NAF) and LoC Subject Authority File (LoC SAF) entries; it sought to determine which types of errors occured most frequently in instances where access points did not match the NAF and SAF files; and used the results of this analysis to add data to a list of preferred libraries kept by the Monograph Cataligng Section of the New York Public Library and used to increase the speed and efficiency of its copy cataloguing work flow
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 22(1996) no.1, S.29-47
  19. Bowen, J.: FRBR : coming soon to your library? (2005) 0.03
    0.032297708 = product of:
      0.04844656 = sum of:
        0.029935975 = weight(_text_:to in 122) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.029935975 = score(doc=122,freq=18.0), product of:
            0.08279609 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.818051 = idf(docFreq=19512, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045541126 = queryNorm
            0.36156267 = fieldWeight in 122, product of:
              4.2426405 = tf(freq=18.0), with freq of:
                18.0 = termFreq=18.0
              1.818051 = idf(docFreq=19512, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=122)
        0.018510582 = product of:
          0.037021164 = sum of:
            0.037021164 = weight(_text_:22 in 122) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.037021164 = score(doc=122,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15947726 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045541126 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 122, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=122)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    The Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records (FRBR) data model holds great potential for improving access to library resources, but may not affect all libraries in the same way. The Joint Steering Committee for Revision of AACR (Anglo-American Cataloguing Rules), assisted by the work of its Format Variation Working Group, is exploring ways to incorporate FRBR into the next edition of the Anglo-American Cataloguing Rules to facilitate collocation at the level of the FRBR entity expression. Several library system vendors are also adding FRBR-based functionality to their systems. A combination of these two approaches to FRBR can provide significant benefits to users. Most FRBR entities and attributes are already present in library catalog records, and the influence of FRBR can also be seen in existing library activities. FRBR is thus not something totally foreign, but a fresh, more rigorous way of thinking about what libraries already do that provides a basis for designing new ways to improve users' access to library resources.
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  20. Ho, J.: Cataloging practices and access methods for videos at arl and public libraries in the United States (2004) 0.03
    0.032297708 = product of:
      0.04844656 = sum of:
        0.029935975 = weight(_text_:to in 134) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.029935975 = score(doc=134,freq=18.0), product of:
            0.08279609 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.818051 = idf(docFreq=19512, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045541126 = queryNorm
            0.36156267 = fieldWeight in 134, product of:
              4.2426405 = tf(freq=18.0), with freq of:
                18.0 = termFreq=18.0
              1.818051 = idf(docFreq=19512, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=134)
        0.018510582 = product of:
          0.037021164 = sum of:
            0.037021164 = weight(_text_:22 in 134) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.037021164 = score(doc=134,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15947726 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045541126 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 134, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=134)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    Libraries may vary in the level and fullness of cataloging they give to video recordings and in the methods they use to provide access to them. This paper reports the results of a survey exploring the level of cataloging and access methods applied to videos, the degree to which catalogers view screen credits, and how often various credit information is included and used to create access points in catalog records in selected U. S. public and Association of Research Libraries member libraries. Resources for cataloging videos also were examined. Results showed that most libraries cataloged videos at the full level and provided access points to similar types of information in catalog records. Academic librarians reported viewing videos and providing access points to certain information to a greater extent than public librarians did. This study offers a general picture of the credit information libraries include or omit in video catalog records.
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22

Languages

Types

  • a 1172
  • m 63
  • el 61
  • s 18
  • b 16
  • r 8
  • n 5
  • ag 2
  • p 2
  • x 2
  • ? 1
  • l 1
  • More… Less…

Subjects