-
Moen, W.E.: ¬The metadata approach to accessing government information (2001)
0.04
0.044316597 = product of:
0.06647489 = sum of:
0.023283537 = weight(_text_:to in 4407) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.023283537 = score(doc=4407,freq=2.0), product of:
0.08279609 = queryWeight, product of:
1.818051 = idf(docFreq=19512, maxDocs=44218)
0.045541126 = queryNorm
0.28121543 = fieldWeight in 4407, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.818051 = idf(docFreq=19512, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4407)
0.043191355 = product of:
0.08638271 = sum of:
0.08638271 = weight(_text_:22 in 4407) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08638271 = score(doc=4407,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15947726 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045541126 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 4407, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4407)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Date
- 28. 3.2002 9:22:34
-
Caplan, P.; Guenther, R.: Metadata for Internet resources : the Dublin Core Metadata Elements Set and its mapping to USMARC (1996)
0.04
0.038632408 = product of:
0.05794861 = sum of:
0.023044726 = weight(_text_:to in 2408) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.023044726 = score(doc=2408,freq=6.0), product of:
0.08279609 = queryWeight, product of:
1.818051 = idf(docFreq=19512, maxDocs=44218)
0.045541126 = queryNorm
0.2783311 = fieldWeight in 2408, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
1.818051 = idf(docFreq=19512, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2408)
0.034903888 = product of:
0.069807775 = sum of:
0.069807775 = weight(_text_:22 in 2408) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.069807775 = score(doc=2408,freq=4.0), product of:
0.15947726 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045541126 = queryNorm
0.4377287 = fieldWeight in 2408, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2408)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- This paper discuesses the goals and outcome of the OCLC/NCSA Metadata Workshop held March 1-3, 1995 in Dublin Ohio. The resulting proposed "Dublin Core" Metadata Elements Set is described briefly. An attempt is made to map the Dublin Core data elements to USMARC; problems and outstanding questions are noted.
- Date
- 13. 1.2007 18:31:22
- Source
- Cataloging and classification quarterly. 22(1996) nos.3/4, S.43-58
-
El-Sherbini, M.: Metadata and the future of cataloging (2001)
0.04
0.03628759 = product of:
0.054431386 = sum of:
0.029750613 = weight(_text_:to in 751) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.029750613 = score(doc=751,freq=10.0), product of:
0.08279609 = queryWeight, product of:
1.818051 = idf(docFreq=19512, maxDocs=44218)
0.045541126 = queryNorm
0.3593239 = fieldWeight in 751, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
1.818051 = idf(docFreq=19512, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=751)
0.024680775 = product of:
0.04936155 = sum of:
0.04936155 = weight(_text_:22 in 751) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04936155 = score(doc=751,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15947726 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045541126 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 751, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=751)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- This article is a survey of representative metadata efforts comparing them to MARC 21 metadata in order to determine if new electronic formats require the development of a new set of standards. This study surveys the ongoing metadata projects in order to identify what types of metadata exist and how they are used and also compares and analyzes selected metadata elements in an attempt to illustrate how they are related to MARC 21 metadata format elements.
- Date
- 23. 1.2007 11:22:30
-
Gardner, T.; Iannella, R.: Architecture and software solutions (2000)
0.03
0.034193687 = product of:
0.05129053 = sum of:
0.026609756 = weight(_text_:to in 4867) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.026609756 = score(doc=4867,freq=8.0), product of:
0.08279609 = queryWeight, product of:
1.818051 = idf(docFreq=19512, maxDocs=44218)
0.045541126 = queryNorm
0.32138905 = fieldWeight in 4867, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
1.818051 = idf(docFreq=19512, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4867)
0.024680775 = product of:
0.04936155 = sum of:
0.04936155 = weight(_text_:22 in 4867) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04936155 = score(doc=4867,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15947726 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045541126 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4867, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4867)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- The current subject gateways have evolved over time when the discipline of Internet resource discovery was in its infancy. This is reflected by the lack of well-established, light-weight, deployable, easy-to-use, standards for metadata and information retrieval. We provide an introduction to the architecture, standards and software solutions in use by subject gateways, and to the issues that must be addressed to support future subject gateways
- Date
- 22. 6.2002 19:38:24
-
Marchiori, M.: ¬The limits of Web metadata, and beyond (1998)
0.03
0.033408046 = product of:
0.05011207 = sum of:
0.028516391 = weight(_text_:to in 3383) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.028516391 = score(doc=3383,freq=12.0), product of:
0.08279609 = queryWeight, product of:
1.818051 = idf(docFreq=19512, maxDocs=44218)
0.045541126 = queryNorm
0.34441712 = fieldWeight in 3383, product of:
3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
12.0 = termFreq=12.0
1.818051 = idf(docFreq=19512, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3383)
0.021595677 = product of:
0.043191355 = sum of:
0.043191355 = weight(_text_:22 in 3383) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.043191355 = score(doc=3383,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15947726 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045541126 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 3383, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3383)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- Highlights 2 major problems of the WWW metadata: it will take some time before a reasonable number of people start using metadata to provide a better Web classification, and that no one can guarantee that a majority of the Web objects will be ever properly classified via metadata. Addresses the problem of how to cope with intrinsic limits of Web metadata, proposes a method to solve these problems and show evidence of its effectiveness. Examines the important problem of what is the required critical mass in the WWW for metadata in order for it to be really useful
- Date
- 1. 8.1996 22:08:06
- Footnote
- Contribution to a special issue devoted to the Proceedings of the 7th International World Wide Web Conference, held 14-18 April 1998, Brisbane, Australia
-
Tennant, R.: ¬A bibliographic metadata infrastructure for the twenty-first century (2004)
0.03
0.03213918 = product of:
0.048208766 = sum of:
0.013304878 = weight(_text_:to in 2845) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.013304878 = score(doc=2845,freq=2.0), product of:
0.08279609 = queryWeight, product of:
1.818051 = idf(docFreq=19512, maxDocs=44218)
0.045541126 = queryNorm
0.16069452 = fieldWeight in 2845, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.818051 = idf(docFreq=19512, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2845)
0.034903888 = product of:
0.069807775 = sum of:
0.069807775 = weight(_text_:22 in 2845) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.069807775 = score(doc=2845,freq=4.0), product of:
0.15947726 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045541126 = queryNorm
0.4377287 = fieldWeight in 2845, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2845)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- The current library bibliographic infrastructure was constructed in the early days of computers - before the Web, XML, and a variety of other technological advances that now offer new opportunities. General requirements of a modern metadata infrastructure for libraries are identified, including such qualities as versatility, extensibility, granularity, and openness. A new kind of metadata infrastructure is then proposed that exhibits at least some of those qualities. Some key challenges that must be overcome to implement a change of this magnitude are identified.
- Date
- 9.12.2005 19:22:38
- Source
- Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.2, S.175-181
-
Brugger, J.M.: Cataloging for digital libraries (1996)
0.03
0.031817 = product of:
0.0477255 = sum of:
0.023044726 = weight(_text_:to in 3689) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.023044726 = score(doc=3689,freq=6.0), product of:
0.08279609 = queryWeight, product of:
1.818051 = idf(docFreq=19512, maxDocs=44218)
0.045541126 = queryNorm
0.2783311 = fieldWeight in 3689, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
1.818051 = idf(docFreq=19512, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3689)
0.024680775 = product of:
0.04936155 = sum of:
0.04936155 = weight(_text_:22 in 3689) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04936155 = score(doc=3689,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15947726 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045541126 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3689, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3689)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- Using grant funding, some prominent creators of digital libraries have promised users of networked resources certain kinds of access. Some of this access finds a ready-made vehicle in USMARC, some of it in the TEI header, some of it has yet to find the most appropriate vehicle. In its quest to provide access to what users need, the cataloging community can show leadership by exploring the strength inherent in a metadata-providing system like the TEI header.
- Source
- Cataloging and classification quarterly. 22(1996) nos.3/4, S.59-73
-
Waugh, A.: Specifying metadata standards for metadata tool configuration (1998)
0.03
0.031817 = product of:
0.0477255 = sum of:
0.023044726 = weight(_text_:to in 3596) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.023044726 = score(doc=3596,freq=6.0), product of:
0.08279609 = queryWeight, product of:
1.818051 = idf(docFreq=19512, maxDocs=44218)
0.045541126 = queryNorm
0.2783311 = fieldWeight in 3596, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
1.818051 = idf(docFreq=19512, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3596)
0.024680775 = product of:
0.04936155 = sum of:
0.04936155 = weight(_text_:22 in 3596) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04936155 = score(doc=3596,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15947726 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045541126 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3596, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3596)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- Describes a metadata specification designed to support dynamic configuration of metadata software by capturing features of metadata standards. The specification comprises 3 components: the classification of the metadata standard, the metadata schema, and the metadata expression
- Date
- 1. 8.1996 22:08:06
- Footnote
- Contribution to a special issue devoted to the Proceedings of the 7th International World Wide Web Conference, held 14-18 April 1998, Brisbane, Australia
-
Understanding metadata (2004)
0.03
0.031817 = product of:
0.0477255 = sum of:
0.023044726 = weight(_text_:to in 2686) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.023044726 = score(doc=2686,freq=6.0), product of:
0.08279609 = queryWeight, product of:
1.818051 = idf(docFreq=19512, maxDocs=44218)
0.045541126 = queryNorm
0.2783311 = fieldWeight in 2686, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
1.818051 = idf(docFreq=19512, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2686)
0.024680775 = product of:
0.04936155 = sum of:
0.04936155 = weight(_text_:22 in 2686) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04936155 = score(doc=2686,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15947726 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045541126 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2686, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2686)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- Metadata (structured information about an object or collection of objects) is increasingly important to libraries, archives, and museums. And although librarians are familiar with a number of issues that apply to creating and using metadata (e.g., authority control, controlled vocabularies, etc.), the world of metadata is nonetheless different than library cataloging, with its own set of challenges. Therefore, whether you are new to these concepts or quite experienced with classic cataloging, this short (20 pages) introductory paper on metadata can be helpful
- Date
- 10. 9.2004 10:22:40
-
Cundiff, M.V.: ¬An introduction to the Metadata Encoding and Transmission Standard (METS) (2004)
0.03
0.031817 = product of:
0.0477255 = sum of:
0.023044726 = weight(_text_:to in 2834) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.023044726 = score(doc=2834,freq=6.0), product of:
0.08279609 = queryWeight, product of:
1.818051 = idf(docFreq=19512, maxDocs=44218)
0.045541126 = queryNorm
0.2783311 = fieldWeight in 2834, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
1.818051 = idf(docFreq=19512, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2834)
0.024680775 = product of:
0.04936155 = sum of:
0.04936155 = weight(_text_:22 in 2834) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04936155 = score(doc=2834,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15947726 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045541126 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2834, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2834)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- This article provides an introductory overview of the Metadata Encoding and Transmission Standard, better known as METS. It will be of most use to librarians and technical staff who are encountering METS for the first time. The article contains a brief history of the development of METS, a primer covering the basic structure and content of METS documents, and a discussion of several issues relevant to the implementation and continuing development of METS including object models, extension schemata, and application profiles.
- Source
- Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.1, S.52-64
-
Hill, J.S.: Analog people for digital dreams : staffing and educational considerations for cataloging and metadata professionals (2005)
0.03
0.031817 = product of:
0.0477255 = sum of:
0.023044726 = weight(_text_:to in 126) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.023044726 = score(doc=126,freq=6.0), product of:
0.08279609 = queryWeight, product of:
1.818051 = idf(docFreq=19512, maxDocs=44218)
0.045541126 = queryNorm
0.2783311 = fieldWeight in 126, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
1.818051 = idf(docFreq=19512, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=126)
0.024680775 = product of:
0.04936155 = sum of:
0.04936155 = weight(_text_:22 in 126) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04936155 = score(doc=126,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15947726 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045541126 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 126, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=126)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- As libraries attempt to incorporate increasing amounts of electronic resources into their catalogs, utilizing a growing variety of metadata standards, library and information science programs are grappling with how to educate catalogers to meet these challenges. In this paper, an employer considers the characteristics and skills that catalogers will need and how they might acquire them.
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
-
Liechti, O.; Sifer, M.J.; Ichikawa, T.: Structured graph format : XML metadata for describing Web site structure (1998)
0.03
0.031751644 = product of:
0.047627464 = sum of:
0.026031785 = weight(_text_:to in 3597) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.026031785 = score(doc=3597,freq=10.0), product of:
0.08279609 = queryWeight, product of:
1.818051 = idf(docFreq=19512, maxDocs=44218)
0.045541126 = queryNorm
0.3144084 = fieldWeight in 3597, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
1.818051 = idf(docFreq=19512, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3597)
0.021595677 = product of:
0.043191355 = sum of:
0.043191355 = weight(_text_:22 in 3597) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.043191355 = score(doc=3597,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15947726 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045541126 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 3597, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3597)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- To improve searching, filtering and processing of information on the Web, a common effort is made in the direction of metadata, defined as machine understandable information about Web resources or other things. In particular, the eXtensible Markup Language (XML) aims at providing a common syntax to emerging metadata formats. Proposes the Structured Graph Format (SGF) an XML compliant markup language based on structured graphs, for capturing Web sites' structure. Presents SGMapper, a client-site tool, which aims to facilitate navigation in large Web sites by generating highly interactive site maps using SGF metadata
- Date
- 1. 8.1996 22:08:06
- Footnote
- Contribution to a special issue devoted to the Proceedings of the 7th International World Wide Web Conference, held 14-18 April 1998, Brisbane, Australia
-
Brasethvik, T.: ¬A semantic modeling approach to metadata (1998)
0.03
0.031751644 = product of:
0.047627464 = sum of:
0.026031785 = weight(_text_:to in 5165) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.026031785 = score(doc=5165,freq=10.0), product of:
0.08279609 = queryWeight, product of:
1.818051 = idf(docFreq=19512, maxDocs=44218)
0.045541126 = queryNorm
0.3144084 = fieldWeight in 5165, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
1.818051 = idf(docFreq=19512, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5165)
0.021595677 = product of:
0.043191355 = sum of:
0.043191355 = weight(_text_:22 in 5165) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.043191355 = score(doc=5165,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15947726 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045541126 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 5165, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5165)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- States that heterogeneous project groups today may be expected to use the mechanisms of the Web for sharing information. Metadata has been proposed as a mechanism for expressing the semantics of information and, hence, facilitate information retrieval, understanding and use. Presents an approach to sharing information which aims to use a semantic modeling language as the basis for expressing the semantics of information and designing metadata schemes. Functioning on the borderline between human and computer understandability, the modeling language would be able to express the semantics of published Web documents. Reporting on work in progress, presents the overall framework and ideas
- Date
- 9. 9.2000 17:22:23
-
Kopácsi, S. et al.: Development of a classification server to support metadata harmonization in a long term preservation system (2016)
0.03
0.03165471 = product of:
0.047482066 = sum of:
0.016631098 = weight(_text_:to in 3280) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.016631098 = score(doc=3280,freq=2.0), product of:
0.08279609 = queryWeight, product of:
1.818051 = idf(docFreq=19512, maxDocs=44218)
0.045541126 = queryNorm
0.20086816 = fieldWeight in 3280, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.818051 = idf(docFreq=19512, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3280)
0.03085097 = product of:
0.06170194 = sum of:
0.06170194 = weight(_text_:22 in 3280) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06170194 = score(doc=3280,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15947726 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045541126 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 3280, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3280)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Source
- Metadata and semantics research: 10th International Conference, MTSR 2016, Göttingen, Germany, November 22-25, 2016, Proceedings. Eds.: E. Garoufallou
-
Catarino, M.E.; Baptista, A.A.: Relating folksonomies with Dublin Core (2008)
0.03
0.031174384 = product of:
0.046761576 = sum of:
0.024946647 = weight(_text_:to in 2652) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.024946647 = score(doc=2652,freq=18.0), product of:
0.08279609 = queryWeight, product of:
1.818051 = idf(docFreq=19512, maxDocs=44218)
0.045541126 = queryNorm
0.30130222 = fieldWeight in 2652, product of:
4.2426405 = tf(freq=18.0), with freq of:
18.0 = termFreq=18.0
1.818051 = idf(docFreq=19512, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2652)
0.02181493 = product of:
0.04362986 = sum of:
0.04362986 = weight(_text_:22 in 2652) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04362986 = score(doc=2652,freq=4.0), product of:
0.15947726 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045541126 = queryNorm
0.27358043 = fieldWeight in 2652, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2652)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- Folksonomy is the result of describing Web resources with tags created by Web users. Although it has become a popular application for the description of resources, in general terms Folksonomies are not being conveniently integrated in metadata. However, if the appropriate metadata elements are identified, then further work may be conducted to automatically assign tags to these elements (RDF properties) and use them in Semantic Web applications. This article presents research carried out to continue the project Kinds of Tags, which intends to identify elements required for metadata originating from folksonomies and to propose an application profile for DC Social Tagging. The work provides information that may be used by software applications to assign tags to metadata elements and, therefore, means for tags to be conveniently gathered by metadata interoperability tools. Despite the unquestionably high value of DC and the significance of the already existing properties in DC Terms, the pilot study show revealed a significant number of tags for which no corresponding properties yet existed. A need for new properties, such as Action, Depth, Rate, and Utility was determined. Those potential new properties will have to be validated in a later stage by the DC Social Tagging Community.
- Pages
- S.14-22
- Source
- Metadata for semantic and social applications : proceedings of the International Conference on Dublin Core and Metadata Applications, Berlin, 22 - 26 September 2008, DC 2008: Berlin, Germany / ed. by Jane Greenberg and Wolfgang Klas
-
Kurth, M.; Ruddy, D.; Rupp, N.: Repurposing MARC metadata : using digital project experience to develop a metadata management design (2004)
0.03
0.031156328 = product of:
0.04673449 = sum of:
0.02822391 = weight(_text_:to in 4748) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02822391 = score(doc=4748,freq=16.0), product of:
0.08279609 = queryWeight, product of:
1.818051 = idf(docFreq=19512, maxDocs=44218)
0.045541126 = queryNorm
0.34088457 = fieldWeight in 4748, product of:
4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
16.0 = termFreq=16.0
1.818051 = idf(docFreq=19512, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4748)
0.018510582 = product of:
0.037021164 = sum of:
0.037021164 = weight(_text_:22 in 4748) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.037021164 = score(doc=4748,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15947726 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045541126 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4748, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4748)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- Metadata and information technology staff in libraries that are building digital collections typically extract and manipulate MARC metadata sets to provide access to digital content via non-MARC schemes. Metadata processing in these libraries involves defining the relationships between metadata schemes, moving metadata between schemes, and coordinating the intellectual activity and physical resources required to create and manipulate metadata. Actively managing the non-MARC metadata resources used to build digital collections is something most of these libraries have only begun to do. This article proposes strategies for managing MARC metadata repurposing efforts as the first step in a coordinated approach to library metadata management. Guided by lessons learned from Cornell University library mapping and transformation activities, the authors apply the literature of data resource management to library metadata management and propose a model for managing MARC metadata repurposing processes through the implementation of a metadata management design.
- Source
- Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.2, S.144-152
-
Caplan, P.; Guenther, R.: Metadata for Internet resources : the Dublin Core Metadata Elements Set and its mapping to USMARC (1996)
0.03
0.029919475 = product of:
0.044879213 = sum of:
0.023283537 = weight(_text_:to in 6128) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.023283537 = score(doc=6128,freq=8.0), product of:
0.08279609 = queryWeight, product of:
1.818051 = idf(docFreq=19512, maxDocs=44218)
0.045541126 = queryNorm
0.28121543 = fieldWeight in 6128, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
1.818051 = idf(docFreq=19512, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6128)
0.021595677 = product of:
0.043191355 = sum of:
0.043191355 = weight(_text_:22 in 6128) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.043191355 = score(doc=6128,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15947726 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045541126 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 6128, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6128)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- Discusses the goals and outcome of the OCLC/NCSA Metadata Workshop, held in Dublin, Ohio, 1-3 Mar 95, which resulted in the proposed 'Dublin Core' Metadata Elements. Describes an attempt to map the Dublin Core data elements to the USMARC format (with particular reference to USMARC field 856 for electronic locations), noting problems and outstanding questions. The USMARC format elements considered include: subject, title, author, other-agent, publisher, publication date, identifier, object-type, form, relation, language, source, coverage, and other issues
- Series
- Cataloging and classification quarterly; vol.22, nos.3/4
-
Heery, R.: Information gateways : collaboration and content (2000)
0.03
0.029919475 = product of:
0.044879213 = sum of:
0.023283537 = weight(_text_:to in 4866) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.023283537 = score(doc=4866,freq=8.0), product of:
0.08279609 = queryWeight, product of:
1.818051 = idf(docFreq=19512, maxDocs=44218)
0.045541126 = queryNorm
0.28121543 = fieldWeight in 4866, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
1.818051 = idf(docFreq=19512, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4866)
0.021595677 = product of:
0.043191355 = sum of:
0.043191355 = weight(_text_:22 in 4866) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.043191355 = score(doc=4866,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15947726 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045541126 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 4866, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4866)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- Information subject gateways provide targeted discovery services for their users, giving access to Web resources selected according to quality and subject coverage criteria. Information gateways recognise that they must collaborate on a wide range of issues relating to content to ensure continued success. This report is informed by discussion of content activities at the 1999 Imesh Workshop. The author considers the implications for subject based gateways of co-operation regarding coverage policy, creation of metadata, and provision of searching and browsing across services. Other possibilities for co-operation include working more closely with information providers, and diclosure of information in joint metadata registries
- Date
- 22. 6.2002 19:38:54
-
Lubas, R.L.; Wolfe, R.H.W.; Fleischman, M.: Creating metadata practices for MIT's OpenCourseWare Project (2004)
0.03
0.029919475 = product of:
0.044879213 = sum of:
0.023283537 = weight(_text_:to in 2843) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.023283537 = score(doc=2843,freq=8.0), product of:
0.08279609 = queryWeight, product of:
1.818051 = idf(docFreq=19512, maxDocs=44218)
0.045541126 = queryNorm
0.28121543 = fieldWeight in 2843, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
1.818051 = idf(docFreq=19512, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2843)
0.021595677 = product of:
0.043191355 = sum of:
0.043191355 = weight(_text_:22 in 2843) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.043191355 = score(doc=2843,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15947726 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045541126 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2843, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2843)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- The MIT libraries were called upon to recommend a metadata scheme for the resources contained in MIT's OpenCourseWare (OCW) project. The resources in OCW needed descriptive, structural, and technical metadata. The SCORM standard, which uses IEEE Learning Object Metadata for its descriptive standard, was selected for its focus on educational objects. However, it was clear that the Libraries would need to recommend how the standard would be applied and adapted to accommodate needs that were not addressed in the standard's specifications. The newly formed MIT Libraries Metadata Unit adapted established practices from AACR2 and MARC traditions when facing situations in which there were no precedents to follow.
- Source
- Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.2, S.138-143
-
Vellucci, S.L.: Metadata and authority control (2000)
0.03
0.029919475 = product of:
0.044879213 = sum of:
0.023283537 = weight(_text_:to in 180) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.023283537 = score(doc=180,freq=8.0), product of:
0.08279609 = queryWeight, product of:
1.818051 = idf(docFreq=19512, maxDocs=44218)
0.045541126 = queryNorm
0.28121543 = fieldWeight in 180, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
1.818051 = idf(docFreq=19512, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=180)
0.021595677 = product of:
0.043191355 = sum of:
0.043191355 = weight(_text_:22 in 180) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.043191355 = score(doc=180,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15947726 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045541126 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 180, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=180)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- A variety of information communities have developed metadata schemes to meet the needs of their own users. The ability of libraries to incorporate and use multiple metadata schemes in current library systems will depend on the compatibility of imported data with existing catalog data. Authority control will play an important role in metadata interoperability. In this article, I discuss factors for successful authority control in current library catalogs, which include operation in a well-defined and bounded universe, application of principles and standard practices to access point creation, reference to authoritative lists, and bibliographic record creation by highly trained individuals. Metadata characteristics and environmental models are examined and the likelihood of successful authority control is explored for a variety of metadata environments.
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
