Search (664 results, page 1 of 34)

  • × theme_ss:"OPAC"
  1. Davis, E.; Stone, J.: ¬A painless route on to the Web : Web services 1: The Royal Postgraduate Medical School (1997) 0.04
    0.038180627 = product of:
      0.057270937 = sum of:
        0.032590162 = weight(_text_:to in 1632) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.032590162 = score(doc=1632,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.08279609 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.818051 = idf(docFreq=19512, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045541126 = queryNorm
            0.39361957 = fieldWeight in 1632, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              1.818051 = idf(docFreq=19512, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1632)
        0.024680775 = product of:
          0.04936155 = sum of:
            0.04936155 = weight(_text_:22 in 1632) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04936155 = score(doc=1632,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15947726 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045541126 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1632, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1632)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    1st of 2 articles detailing how library management systems have been used in special libraries to launch WWW catalogue services. Describes how the Royal Postgraduate Medical School, London, UK, used Sirsi Unicorn software to add WWW browser catalogue access, WebCat, to their WWW service. Explains how WebCat was set up, its facilities, providing links to electronic journals, and links via the homepage to other sites
    Date
    29. 7.1998 21:22:27
  2. Sloan, B.G.: Remote access : design implications for the online catalog (1991) 0.04
    0.03634905 = product of:
      0.054523572 = sum of:
        0.032927893 = weight(_text_:to in 3696) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.032927893 = score(doc=3696,freq=16.0), product of:
            0.08279609 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.818051 = idf(docFreq=19512, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045541126 = queryNorm
            0.39769864 = fieldWeight in 3696, product of:
              4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
                16.0 = termFreq=16.0
              1.818051 = idf(docFreq=19512, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3696)
        0.021595677 = product of:
          0.043191355 = sum of:
            0.043191355 = weight(_text_:22 in 3696) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.043191355 = score(doc=3696,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15947726 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045541126 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 3696, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3696)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    Provides examples to illustrate the growing use and acceptance of remote access to OPACs. Examines the differences between offering in-house public access and remote access to users and offers suggestions to help address some of the requirements of remote users. Discusses the shortcomings of the bibliographic record, what can be done to enhance the OPAC record, remote access to periodical indexes, access to the physical items represented by the bibliographic records, and the importance of establishing lines of communication with remote users
    Date
    8. 1.2007 17:22:42
    Footnote
    Simultaneously published as Enhancing Access to Information: Designing Catalogs for the 21st Century
  3. Green, E.; Head, A.J.: Web-based catalogs : is their design language anything to talk about? (1998) 0.04
    0.03628759 = product of:
      0.054431386 = sum of:
        0.029750613 = weight(_text_:to in 5185) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.029750613 = score(doc=5185,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.08279609 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.818051 = idf(docFreq=19512, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045541126 = queryNorm
            0.3593239 = fieldWeight in 5185, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              1.818051 = idf(docFreq=19512, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5185)
        0.024680775 = product of:
          0.04936155 = sum of:
            0.04936155 = weight(_text_:22 in 5185) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04936155 = score(doc=5185,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15947726 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045541126 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 5185, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5185)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    Stanford University's Socrates II and University of California at Berkeley's Pathfinder are 2 USA World Wide Web based online publication access catalogues under development. They differ in their design language (how an interface functionally and visually communicates to the users). Evaluates each system's interface design and their ability to communicate functionality to users: analyzes design in terms of: colour, buttons, metaphors, layout, and basic and advanced search modes. Concludes that the design languages of both systems have the right directive and have the potential to evolve
    Source
    Online. 22(1998) no.4, S.98-105
  4. Sandlian, P.: Rethinking the rules (1995) 0.03
    0.034193687 = product of:
      0.05129053 = sum of:
        0.026609756 = weight(_text_:to in 3099) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.026609756 = score(doc=3099,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.08279609 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.818051 = idf(docFreq=19512, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045541126 = queryNorm
            0.32138905 = fieldWeight in 3099, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              1.818051 = idf(docFreq=19512, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3099)
        0.024680775 = product of:
          0.04936155 = sum of:
            0.04936155 = weight(_text_:22 in 3099) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04936155 = score(doc=3099,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15947726 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045541126 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3099, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3099)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    Rules regarding cataloguing, subject headings, the way information in bibliographic records is organised and the catalogue's interface, or the way the screen is set up, are barriers to the use of online catalogues by children Describes the background to and implementation of a project to create a child orientation catalogue with a graphical user interface, or one that relies on pictures instead of text, within Denver Public Library in Colorado. Now called the Kid's catalog and commercially available from the Colorado Alliance of Research Libraries Co., the catalogue's software acts as a front end to a library's regular catalogue
    Source
    School library journal. 41(1995) no.7, S.22-25
  5. Nuttall, H.D.; McAbee, S.L.: Pathfinders on-line : adding pathfinders to a NOTIS on-line system (1997) 0.03
    0.034193687 = product of:
      0.05129053 = sum of:
        0.026609756 = weight(_text_:to in 510) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.026609756 = score(doc=510,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.08279609 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.818051 = idf(docFreq=19512, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045541126 = queryNorm
            0.32138905 = fieldWeight in 510, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              1.818051 = idf(docFreq=19512, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=510)
        0.024680775 = product of:
          0.04936155 = sum of:
            0.04936155 = weight(_text_:22 in 510) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04936155 = score(doc=510,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15947726 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045541126 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 510, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=510)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    For decades print pathfinders have complemented card catalogues and been useful reference tools. They are overlooked as components of online catalogues, even though they can extend the depth of the catalogue. To encourage librarians to consider integrating pathfinders into online catalogues discusses problems in OPAC searching, describes the value and styles of pathfinders, and illustrates how to include them in a NOTIS system
    Date
    27.11.1995 17:07:22
  6. Lee, Y.-R.: ¬A study on the conditions of using OPAC access points and subject searching by users (1997) 0.03
    0.034193687 = product of:
      0.05129053 = sum of:
        0.026609756 = weight(_text_:to in 933) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.026609756 = score(doc=933,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.08279609 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.818051 = idf(docFreq=19512, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045541126 = queryNorm
            0.32138905 = fieldWeight in 933, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              1.818051 = idf(docFreq=19512, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=933)
        0.024680775 = product of:
          0.04936155 = sum of:
            0.04936155 = weight(_text_:22 in 933) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04936155 = score(doc=933,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15947726 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045541126 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 933, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=933)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    Uses the results of various user studies to offer some insight into user behaviour in connection with OPAC access points and to explore conditions for subject searching, the difficulties involved and the matching of queries to subject headings. Sums up suggestions for the improvement of subject access to OPACs
    Source
    Bulletin of library and information science. 1997, no.22, S.39-55
  7. Hancock-Beaulieu, M.: Searching behaviour and the evaluation of online catalogues (1991) 0.03
    0.034193687 = product of:
      0.05129053 = sum of:
        0.026609756 = weight(_text_:to in 2765) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.026609756 = score(doc=2765,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.08279609 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.818051 = idf(docFreq=19512, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045541126 = queryNorm
            0.32138905 = fieldWeight in 2765, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              1.818051 = idf(docFreq=19512, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2765)
        0.024680775 = product of:
          0.04936155 = sum of:
            0.04936155 = weight(_text_:22 in 2765) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04936155 = score(doc=2765,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15947726 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045541126 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2765, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2765)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    Presents a brief report on a study, carried out by the Centre for Interactive Systems Research, City University, to investigate the techniques used for evaluating OPACs: to explore and assess different data gathering methods in studying information seeking behaviour at the on-line catalogue; and to examine how a transaction logging facility could be enhanced to serve as a more effective diagnostic tool. For a full report see British Library research paper 78
    Pages
    S.20-22
  8. Cherry, J.M.; Clinton, M.: ¬An experimental investigation of two types of instruction for OPAC users (1991) 0.03
    0.031817 = product of:
      0.0477255 = sum of:
        0.023044726 = weight(_text_:to in 3098) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.023044726 = score(doc=3098,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.08279609 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.818051 = idf(docFreq=19512, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045541126 = queryNorm
            0.2783311 = fieldWeight in 3098, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.818051 = idf(docFreq=19512, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3098)
        0.024680775 = product of:
          0.04936155 = sum of:
            0.04936155 = weight(_text_:22 in 3098) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04936155 = score(doc=3098,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15947726 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045541126 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3098, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3098)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    Reports an investigation into the feasibility of usinf tutorials to train students to use on-line public access catalogues (OPACs). The library developed instructional software which conveys a conceptual model of an on-line catalogue and how it works. Reports the results of an experiment conducted to compare the effectiveness of the computer tutorial and the standard introductory classroom lecture on using the OPAC at the University of Toronto
    Source
    Canadian journal of information science. 16(1991) no.4, S.2-22
  9. Martin, G.: Main entry : the argument for a defence of main entry in the OPAC (1996) 0.03
    0.031817 = product of:
      0.0477255 = sum of:
        0.023044726 = weight(_text_:to in 7234) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.023044726 = score(doc=7234,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.08279609 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.818051 = idf(docFreq=19512, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045541126 = queryNorm
            0.2783311 = fieldWeight in 7234, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.818051 = idf(docFreq=19512, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7234)
        0.024680775 = product of:
          0.04936155 = sum of:
            0.04936155 = weight(_text_:22 in 7234) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04936155 = score(doc=7234,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15947726 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045541126 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 7234, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7234)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    Argues that the current understanding of main entry is the chief access point for the work in a physical item being described by a bibliographic record. Explains the justification for main entries while drawing attention to the few related problems as they relate to OPACs
    Footnote
    Paper presented at the Australian Committee on Cataloguing (ACOC) seminar 'Rule revisions: who needs them' held prior to the National Cataloguing Conference in Oct. 95
    Source
    Cataloguing Australia. 22(1996) nos.1/2, S.21-25
  10. Hogan, S.A.: Educating users about catalogues and cataloguing : the impossible dream (1993) 0.03
    0.03165471 = product of:
      0.047482066 = sum of:
        0.016631098 = weight(_text_:to in 6437) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.016631098 = score(doc=6437,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08279609 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.818051 = idf(docFreq=19512, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045541126 = queryNorm
            0.20086816 = fieldWeight in 6437, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.818051 = idf(docFreq=19512, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=6437)
        0.03085097 = product of:
          0.06170194 = sum of:
            0.06170194 = weight(_text_:22 in 6437) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06170194 = score(doc=6437,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15947726 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045541126 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 6437, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=6437)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    Catalogue use studies in manual and online environments over the last 50 years have been succesful in identifying user behaviour and causes of user failure, but they have not led to substantial change in catalogue codes of practices. The online environment offers a myriad of new challenges
    Source
    International cataloguing and bibliographic control. 22(1993) no.2, S.23-26
  11. Hillmann, D.I.: 'Parallel universes' or meaningful relationships : envisioning a future for the OPAC and the net (1996) 0.03
    0.029919475 = product of:
      0.044879213 = sum of:
        0.023283537 = weight(_text_:to in 3656) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.023283537 = score(doc=3656,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.08279609 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.818051 = idf(docFreq=19512, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045541126 = queryNorm
            0.28121543 = fieldWeight in 3656, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              1.818051 = idf(docFreq=19512, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3656)
        0.021595677 = product of:
          0.043191355 = sum of:
            0.043191355 = weight(_text_:22 in 3656) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.043191355 = score(doc=3656,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15947726 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045541126 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 3656, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3656)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    Briefly follows the debate concerning: the relationship between traditional library OPACs and the WWW; possible replacement of USMARC format with SGML; and the possible demise of OPACs that do not migrate to the WWW. Discusses the approach taken by the Text encoding Initative (TEI) in their use of a mandatory TEI header in their standard SGML application as the first since CIP to explore attaching bibliographic information to the item itself to assist cataloguing
    Series
    Cataloging and classification quarterly; vol.22, nos.3/4
  12. Beccaria, M.; Scott, D.: Fac-Back-OPAC : an open source interface to your library system (2007) 0.03
    0.029919475 = product of:
      0.044879213 = sum of:
        0.023283537 = weight(_text_:to in 2207) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.023283537 = score(doc=2207,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.08279609 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.818051 = idf(docFreq=19512, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045541126 = queryNorm
            0.28121543 = fieldWeight in 2207, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              1.818051 = idf(docFreq=19512, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2207)
        0.021595677 = product of:
          0.043191355 = sum of:
            0.043191355 = weight(_text_:22 in 2207) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.043191355 = score(doc=2207,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15947726 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045541126 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2207, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2207)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    Fac-Back-OPAC is a faceted back­ up OPAC. This advanced catalog offers features that compare favorably with the traditional catalogs for today's library systems. Fac-Back-OPAC represents the convergence of two prominent trends in library tools: the decoupling of discovery tools from the traditional integrated library system and the use of readily available open source components to rapidly produce leading-edge technology for meeting patron and library needs. Built on code that was originally developed by Casey Durfee in February 2007, Fac-Back-OPAC is available for no cost under an open source license to any library that wants to offer an advanced search interface or a backup catalog for its patrons.
    Date
    17. 8.2008 11:22:47
  13. McLachlan, R.W.: Public libraries : shrinking dollars, increased demands; clerical staff and OCLC to the rescue (1991) 0.03
    0.028997809 = product of:
      0.043496713 = sum of:
        0.018815938 = weight(_text_:to in 3860) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.018815938 = score(doc=3860,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.08279609 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.818051 = idf(docFreq=19512, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045541126 = queryNorm
            0.22725637 = fieldWeight in 3860, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.818051 = idf(docFreq=19512, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3860)
        0.024680775 = product of:
          0.04936155 = sum of:
            0.04936155 = weight(_text_:22 in 3860) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04936155 = score(doc=3860,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15947726 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045541126 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3860, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3860)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    Through technology, technical service departments have increased output with unchanged staff levels. Describes how technology has cut the costs of cataloguing at the Phoenix Public Library. A CLSI online system is used. The components are the circulation module, OCLC cataloguing interface, OPAC and dial in access. This has has been linked to an INOVACQ acquisition module. Describes the work structure under this arrangement and the processing of materials
    Source
    OCLC micro. 7(1991) no.6, S.19-22
  14. Mischo, W.H.; Lee, J.: End-user searching in bibliographic databases (1987) 0.03
    0.028997809 = product of:
      0.043496713 = sum of:
        0.018815938 = weight(_text_:to in 336) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.018815938 = score(doc=336,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.08279609 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.818051 = idf(docFreq=19512, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045541126 = queryNorm
            0.22725637 = fieldWeight in 336, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.818051 = idf(docFreq=19512, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=336)
        0.024680775 = product of:
          0.04936155 = sum of:
            0.04936155 = weight(_text_:22 in 336) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04936155 = score(doc=336,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15947726 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045541126 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 336, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=336)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    The growing interest in end user or direct patron access to on-line bibliographic databases is reviewed with references to online catalogues, databases, and CD-ROMs. The literature of end user searching is surveyed with notes on: user training, software search aids, end user services in libraries: characterisation of end user searches; the role of librarians; and CD-ROMs as end user media
    Source
    Annual review of information science and technology. 22(1987), S.227-263
  15. Sharma, A.: ¬The Z39.50 information retrieval protocol (1998) 0.03
    0.028997809 = product of:
      0.043496713 = sum of:
        0.018815938 = weight(_text_:to in 1406) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.018815938 = score(doc=1406,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.08279609 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.818051 = idf(docFreq=19512, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045541126 = queryNorm
            0.22725637 = fieldWeight in 1406, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.818051 = idf(docFreq=19512, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1406)
        0.024680775 = product of:
          0.04936155 = sum of:
            0.04936155 = weight(_text_:22 in 1406) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04936155 = score(doc=1406,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15947726 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045541126 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1406, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1406)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    Reports results of the work of a new member of the ELINOR project team to review the development taking place in Z39.50 networked information retrieval protocol with a view to bringing the University's electronic library pilot systems, including ELINOR and the online catalogue into a single, unified system. Focuses particularly on the WWW client server environment
    Series
    British Library Research and Innovation Centre (BLRIC) report; 22
  16. Ashton, J.: ONE: the final OPAC frontier (1998) 0.03
    0.028997809 = product of:
      0.043496713 = sum of:
        0.018815938 = weight(_text_:to in 2588) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.018815938 = score(doc=2588,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.08279609 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.818051 = idf(docFreq=19512, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045541126 = queryNorm
            0.22725637 = fieldWeight in 2588, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.818051 = idf(docFreq=19512, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2588)
        0.024680775 = product of:
          0.04936155 = sum of:
            0.04936155 = weight(_text_:22 in 2588) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04936155 = score(doc=2588,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15947726 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045541126 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2588, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2588)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    Describes the European Commission's OPAC Network in Europe (ONE) project which attempts to make it simpler to search a number of major European OPACs crossing all frontiers via online interface. Explains how this is done and the British Library's involvement in it, assessment of the project and plans for the future
    Source
    Select newsletter. 1998, no.22, Spring, S.5-6
  17. Lam, V.-T.: Enhancing subject access to monographs in Online Public Access Catalogs : table of contents added to bibliographic records (2000) 0.03
    0.028635468 = product of:
      0.0429532 = sum of:
        0.02444262 = weight(_text_:to in 1187) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02444262 = score(doc=1187,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.08279609 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.818051 = idf(docFreq=19512, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045541126 = queryNorm
            0.29521468 = fieldWeight in 1187, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              1.818051 = idf(docFreq=19512, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1187)
        0.018510582 = product of:
          0.037021164 = sum of:
            0.037021164 = weight(_text_:22 in 1187) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.037021164 = score(doc=1187,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15947726 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045541126 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1187, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1187)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    Subject access to monographs through online public access catalogs (OPACs) has always been a major concern for large research and/or academic libraries. Academic library practice of providing subject access to monographs has proven inadequate, especially in the case of composite works. Many techniques have been proposed to enhance subject treatment of monographs in OPACs. This article briefly reviews these efforts in the past and presents the case of adding Tables of Contents as one of the Most useful and probably also one of the Most costeffective ways of improving subject access to Monographs in an academic environment.
    Date
    22. 9.1997 19:16:05
  18. Rodríguez Bravo, B.; Travieso Rodríguez, C.; Simões, M.G. de M.; Freitas, M.C.V. de: Evaluating discovery tools in Portuguese and Spanish academic libraries (2014) 0.03
    0.028635468 = product of:
      0.0429532 = sum of:
        0.02444262 = weight(_text_:to in 1467) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02444262 = score(doc=1467,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.08279609 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.818051 = idf(docFreq=19512, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045541126 = queryNorm
            0.29521468 = fieldWeight in 1467, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              1.818051 = idf(docFreq=19512, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1467)
        0.018510582 = product of:
          0.037021164 = sum of:
            0.037021164 = weight(_text_:22 in 1467) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.037021164 = score(doc=1467,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15947726 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045541126 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1467, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1467)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    The aim of the research undertaken was to get to know the degree of implementation of discovery tools in university libraries in the Iberian Peninsula. It also allowed an initial evaluation of the facilities offered by the tools implemented. With regard to the presence of discovery tools we find a different situation in the two countries, with a higher degree of implementation in Spain. As for the behaviour of the discovery layers, the eight tools evaluated performed appropriately. Discovery tools represent a considerable advance. The combining of the library's catalogue and indexes to articles with other sources of information in a single unified interface is an unquestionable improvement. However, catalogues and databases still fulfil some purposes better than discovery tools. Libraries need to consider their clients when putting up on their websites the various tools for gaining access to contents.
    Source
    Knowledge organization in the 21st century: between historical patterns and future prospects. Proceedings of the Thirteenth International ISKO Conference 19-22 May 2014, Kraków, Poland. Ed.: Wieslaw Babik
  19. Kaske, N.K.: ¬A comparative study of subject searching in an OPAC among branch libraries of a university library system (1988) 0.03
    0.027839875 = product of:
      0.04175981 = sum of:
        0.020164136 = weight(_text_:to in 760) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.020164136 = score(doc=760,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.08279609 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.818051 = idf(docFreq=19512, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045541126 = queryNorm
            0.24353972 = fieldWeight in 760, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.818051 = idf(docFreq=19512, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=760)
        0.021595677 = product of:
          0.043191355 = sum of:
            0.043191355 = weight(_text_:22 in 760) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.043191355 = score(doc=760,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15947726 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045541126 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 760, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=760)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    The degree of variability in the percentage of subject searching in an online public access catalog (OPAC) among branch libraries of one university was studied. A full semester's worth of transactions was analyzed, not sampled. The time units used were hour of the day, day of the week, and week of the semester. The findings show that subject searching varies from a low of 22% to a high of 74% over the hours of a day. Variability for the days of the week ranged from 17% to 64%, and for the weeks of the semester variability ranged from 12% to 70%. Valuable management information on the utilization of the OPAC within each brach library and among all the branch libraries is provided through numerous charts and graphs.
  20. Golderman, G.M.; Connolly, B.: Between the book covers : going beyond OPAC keyword searching with the deep linking capabilities of Google Scholar and Google Book Search (2004/05) 0.03
    0.026914757 = product of:
      0.040372133 = sum of:
        0.024946647 = weight(_text_:to in 731) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.024946647 = score(doc=731,freq=18.0), product of:
            0.08279609 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.818051 = idf(docFreq=19512, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045541126 = queryNorm
            0.30130222 = fieldWeight in 731, product of:
              4.2426405 = tf(freq=18.0), with freq of:
                18.0 = termFreq=18.0
              1.818051 = idf(docFreq=19512, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=731)
        0.015425485 = product of:
          0.03085097 = sum of:
            0.03085097 = weight(_text_:22 in 731) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03085097 = score(doc=731,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15947726 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045541126 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 731, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=731)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    One finding of the 2006 OCLC study of College Students' Perceptions of Libraries and Information Resources was that students expressed equal levels of trust in libraries and search engines when it came to meeting their information needs in a way that they felt was authoritative. Seeking to incorporate this insight into our own instructional methodology, Schaffer Library at Union College has attempted to engineer a shift from Google to Google Scholar among our student users by representing Scholar as a viable adjunct to the catalog and to snore traditional electronic resources. By attempting to engage student researchers on their own terms, we have discovered that most of them react enthusiastically to the revelation that the Google they think they know so well is, it turns out, a multifaceted resource that is capable of delivering the sort of scholarly information that will meet with their professors' approval. Specifically, this article focuses on the fact that many Google Scholar searches link hack to our own Web catalog where they identify useful book titles that direct OPAC keyword searches have missed.
    Date
    2.12.2007 19:39:22

Authors

Years

Languages

Types

  • a 609
  • el 18
  • m 16
  • s 15
  • r 12
  • x 3
  • b 2
  • d 2
  • i 2
  • p 2
  • ? 1
  • More… Less…