Search (964 results, page 1 of 49)

  • × type_ss:"el"
  1. Kleineberg, M.: Context analysis and context indexing : formal pragmatics in knowledge organization (2014) 0.09
    0.0914556 = product of:
      0.1371834 = sum of:
        0.1205523 = product of:
          0.3616569 = sum of:
            0.3616569 = weight(_text_:3a in 1826) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.3616569 = score(doc=1826,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.38609818 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045541126 = queryNorm
                0.93669677 = fieldWeight in 1826, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1826)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
        0.016631098 = weight(_text_:to in 1826) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.016631098 = score(doc=1826,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08279609 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.818051 = idf(docFreq=19512, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045541126 = queryNorm
            0.20086816 = fieldWeight in 1826, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.818051 = idf(docFreq=19512, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1826)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Content
    Präsentation anlässlich: European Conference on Data Analysis (ECDA 2014) in Bremen, Germany, July 2nd to 4th 2014, LIS-Workshop.
    Source
    http://www.google.de/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=5&ved=0CDQQFjAE&url=http%3A%2F%2Fdigbib.ubka.uni-karlsruhe.de%2Fvolltexte%2Fdocuments%2F3131107&ei=HzFWVYvGMsiNsgGTyoFI&usg=AFQjCNE2FHUeR9oQTQlNC4TPedv4Mo3DaQ&sig2=Rlzpr7a3BLZZkqZCXXN_IA&bvm=bv.93564037,d.bGg&cad=rja
  2. Popper, K.R.: Three worlds : the Tanner lecture on human values. Deliverd at the University of Michigan, April 7, 1978 (1978) 0.08
    0.07683852 = product of:
      0.115257785 = sum of:
        0.09644185 = product of:
          0.28932554 = sum of:
            0.28932554 = weight(_text_:3a in 230) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.28932554 = score(doc=230,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.38609818 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045541126 = queryNorm
                0.7493574 = fieldWeight in 230, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=230)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
        0.018815938 = weight(_text_:to in 230) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.018815938 = score(doc=230,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.08279609 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.818051 = idf(docFreq=19512, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045541126 = queryNorm
            0.22725637 = fieldWeight in 230, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.818051 = idf(docFreq=19512, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=230)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    In this lecture I intend to challenge those who uphold a monist or even a dualist view of the universe; and I will propose, instead, a pluralist view. I will propose a view of the universe that recognizes at least three different but interacting sub-universes.
    Source
    https%3A%2F%2Ftannerlectures.utah.edu%2F_documents%2Fa-to-z%2Fp%2Fpopper80.pdf&usg=AOvVaw3f4QRTEH-OEBmoYr2J_c7H
  3. Van der Veer Martens, B.: Do citation systems represent theories of truth? (2001) 0.04
    0.040173974 = product of:
      0.06026096 = sum of:
        0.016631098 = weight(_text_:to in 3925) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.016631098 = score(doc=3925,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08279609 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.818051 = idf(docFreq=19512, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045541126 = queryNorm
            0.20086816 = fieldWeight in 3925, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.818051 = idf(docFreq=19512, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3925)
        0.04362986 = product of:
          0.08725972 = sum of:
            0.08725972 = weight(_text_:22 in 3925) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08725972 = score(doc=3925,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.15947726 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045541126 = queryNorm
                0.54716086 = fieldWeight in 3925, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3925)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    Arranged according to subjects the bibliography lists 79 references,mostly with terse abstracts.
    Date
    22. 7.2006 15:22:28
  4. Mitchell, J.S.: DDC 22 : an introduction (2003) 0.04
    0.03995412 = product of:
      0.059931174 = sum of:
        0.011641769 = weight(_text_:to in 1936) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.011641769 = score(doc=1936,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08279609 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.818051 = idf(docFreq=19512, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045541126 = queryNorm
            0.14060771 = fieldWeight in 1936, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.818051 = idf(docFreq=19512, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1936)
        0.048289407 = product of:
          0.096578814 = sum of:
            0.096578814 = weight(_text_:22 in 1936) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.096578814 = score(doc=1936,freq=10.0), product of:
                0.15947726 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045541126 = queryNorm
                0.6055961 = fieldWeight in 1936, product of:
                  3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                    10.0 = termFreq=10.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1936)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    Dewey Decimal Classification and Relative Index, Edition 22 (DDC 22) will be issued simultaneously in print and web versions in July 2003. The new edition is the first full print update to the Dewey Decimal Classification system in seven years-it includes several significant updates and many new numbers and topics. DDC 22 also features some fundamental structural changes that have been introduced with the goals of promoting classifier efficiency and improving the DDC for use in a variety of applications in the web environment. Most importantly, the content of the new edition has been shaped by the needs and recommendations of Dewey users around the world. The worldwide user community has an important role in shaping the future of the DDC.
    Object
    DDC-22
  5. Strobel, S.: ¬The complete Linux kit : fully configured LINUX system kernel (1997) 0.04
    0.037985653 = product of:
      0.05697848 = sum of:
        0.019957317 = weight(_text_:to in 8959) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.019957317 = score(doc=8959,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08279609 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.818051 = idf(docFreq=19512, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045541126 = queryNorm
            0.24104178 = fieldWeight in 8959, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.818051 = idf(docFreq=19512, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=8959)
        0.037021164 = product of:
          0.07404233 = sum of:
            0.07404233 = weight(_text_:22 in 8959) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07404233 = score(doc=8959,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15947726 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045541126 = queryNorm
                0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 8959, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=8959)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    Everything users need to maximize the powers of Linux is included in this convenient, inexpensive package
    Date
    16. 7.2002 20:22:55
  6. Dini, L.: CACAO : multilingual access to bibliographic records (2007) 0.04
    0.037985653 = product of:
      0.05697848 = sum of:
        0.019957317 = weight(_text_:to in 126) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.019957317 = score(doc=126,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08279609 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.818051 = idf(docFreq=19512, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045541126 = queryNorm
            0.24104178 = fieldWeight in 126, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.818051 = idf(docFreq=19512, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=126)
        0.037021164 = product of:
          0.07404233 = sum of:
            0.07404233 = weight(_text_:22 in 126) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07404233 = score(doc=126,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15947726 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045541126 = queryNorm
                0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 126, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=126)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Content
    Vortrag anlässlich des Workshops: "Extending the multilingual capacity of The European Library in the EDL project Stockholm, Swedish National Library, 22-23 November 2007".
  7. Haslhofer, B.: Uniform SPARQL access to interlinked (digital library) sources (2007) 0.03
    0.034193687 = product of:
      0.05129053 = sum of:
        0.026609756 = weight(_text_:to in 541) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.026609756 = score(doc=541,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.08279609 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.818051 = idf(docFreq=19512, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045541126 = queryNorm
            0.32138905 = fieldWeight in 541, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              1.818051 = idf(docFreq=19512, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=541)
        0.024680775 = product of:
          0.04936155 = sum of:
            0.04936155 = weight(_text_:22 in 541) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04936155 = score(doc=541,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15947726 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045541126 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 541, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=541)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    In this presentation, we therefore focus on a solution for providing uniform access to Digital Libraries and other online services. In order to enable uniform query access to heterogeneous sources, we must provide metadata interoperability in a way that a query language - in this case SPARQL - can cope with the incompatibility of the metadata in various sources without changing their already existing information models.
    Date
    26.12.2011 13:22:46
  8. Van Dijck, P.: Introduction to XFML (2003) 0.03
    0.031817 = product of:
      0.0477255 = sum of:
        0.023044726 = weight(_text_:to in 2474) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.023044726 = score(doc=2474,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.08279609 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.818051 = idf(docFreq=19512, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045541126 = queryNorm
            0.2783311 = fieldWeight in 2474, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.818051 = idf(docFreq=19512, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2474)
        0.024680775 = product of:
          0.04936155 = sum of:
            0.04936155 = weight(_text_:22 in 2474) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04936155 = score(doc=2474,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15947726 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045541126 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2474, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2474)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    Van Dijck builds up an example of actual XFML by showing how to organize tourist information about what restaurants in what cities feature which kind of music: <facet id="city">City</facet> and <topic id="ny" facetid="city"><name>New York</name></topic> combine to mean that New York is the name of a city internally represented as "ny". It is written in the usual clear and practical style of articles on xml.com. Highly recommended as an introduction for anyone interested in XFML.
    Source
    http://www.xml.com/lpt/a/2003/01/22/xfml.html
  9. Understanding metadata (2004) 0.03
    0.031817 = product of:
      0.0477255 = sum of:
        0.023044726 = weight(_text_:to in 2686) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.023044726 = score(doc=2686,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.08279609 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.818051 = idf(docFreq=19512, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045541126 = queryNorm
            0.2783311 = fieldWeight in 2686, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.818051 = idf(docFreq=19512, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2686)
        0.024680775 = product of:
          0.04936155 = sum of:
            0.04936155 = weight(_text_:22 in 2686) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04936155 = score(doc=2686,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15947726 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045541126 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2686, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2686)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    Metadata (structured information about an object or collection of objects) is increasingly important to libraries, archives, and museums. And although librarians are familiar with a number of issues that apply to creating and using metadata (e.g., authority control, controlled vocabularies, etc.), the world of metadata is nonetheless different than library cataloging, with its own set of challenges. Therefore, whether you are new to these concepts or quite experienced with classic cataloging, this short (20 pages) introductory paper on metadata can be helpful
    Date
    10. 9.2004 10:22:40
  10. Heflin, J.; Hendler, J.: Semantic interoperability on the Web (2000) 0.03
    0.031751644 = product of:
      0.047627464 = sum of:
        0.026031785 = weight(_text_:to in 759) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.026031785 = score(doc=759,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.08279609 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.818051 = idf(docFreq=19512, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045541126 = queryNorm
            0.3144084 = fieldWeight in 759, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              1.818051 = idf(docFreq=19512, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=759)
        0.021595677 = product of:
          0.043191355 = sum of:
            0.043191355 = weight(_text_:22 in 759) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.043191355 = score(doc=759,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15947726 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045541126 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 759, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=759)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    XML will have a profound impact on the way data is exchanged on the Internet. An important feature of this language is the separation of content from presentation, which makes it easier to select and/or reformat the data. However, due to the likelihood of numerous industry and domain specific DTDs, those who wish to integrate information will still be faced with the problem of semantic interoperability. In this paper we discuss why this problem is not solved by XML, and then discuss why the Resource Description Framework is only a partial solution. We then present the SHOE language, which we feel has many of the features necessary to enable a semantic web, and describe an existing set of tools that make it easy to use the language.
    Date
    11. 5.2013 19:22:18
  11. Guidi, F.; Sacerdoti Coen, C.: ¬A survey on retrieval of mathematical knowledge (2015) 0.03
    0.03165471 = product of:
      0.047482066 = sum of:
        0.016631098 = weight(_text_:to in 5865) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.016631098 = score(doc=5865,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08279609 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.818051 = idf(docFreq=19512, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045541126 = queryNorm
            0.20086816 = fieldWeight in 5865, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.818051 = idf(docFreq=19512, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5865)
        0.03085097 = product of:
          0.06170194 = sum of:
            0.06170194 = weight(_text_:22 in 5865) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06170194 = score(doc=5865,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15947726 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045541126 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 5865, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5865)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    We present a short survey of the literature on indexing and retrieval of mathematical knowledge, with pointers to 72 papers and tentative taxonomies of both retrieval problems and recurring techniques.
    Date
    22. 2.2017 12:51:57
  12. Landry, P.: MACS: multilingual access to subject and link management : Extending the Multilingual Capacity of TEL in the EDL Project (2007) 0.03
    0.03165471 = product of:
      0.047482066 = sum of:
        0.016631098 = weight(_text_:to in 1287) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.016631098 = score(doc=1287,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08279609 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.818051 = idf(docFreq=19512, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045541126 = queryNorm
            0.20086816 = fieldWeight in 1287, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.818051 = idf(docFreq=19512, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1287)
        0.03085097 = product of:
          0.06170194 = sum of:
            0.06170194 = weight(_text_:22 in 1287) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06170194 = score(doc=1287,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15947726 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045541126 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 1287, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1287)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Content
    Vortrag anlässlich des Workshops: "Extending the multilingual capacity of The European Library in the EDL project Stockholm, Swedish National Library, 22-23 November 2007".
  13. Mayfield, J.; Finin, T.: Information retrieval on the Semantic Web : integrating inference and retrieval 0.03
    0.029919475 = product of:
      0.044879213 = sum of:
        0.023283537 = weight(_text_:to in 4330) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.023283537 = score(doc=4330,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.08279609 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.818051 = idf(docFreq=19512, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045541126 = queryNorm
            0.28121543 = fieldWeight in 4330, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              1.818051 = idf(docFreq=19512, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4330)
        0.021595677 = product of:
          0.043191355 = sum of:
            0.043191355 = weight(_text_:22 in 4330) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.043191355 = score(doc=4330,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15947726 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045541126 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 4330, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4330)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    One vision of the Semantic Web is that it will be much like the Web we know today, except that documents will be enriched by annotations in machine understandable markup. These annotations will provide metadata about the documents as well as machine interpretable statements capturing some of the meaning of document content. We discuss how the information retrieval paradigm might be recast in such an environment. We suggest that retrieval can be tightly bound to inference. Doing so makes today's Web search engines useful to Semantic Web inference engines, and causes improvements in either retrieval or inference to lead directly to improvements in the other.
    Date
    12. 2.2011 17:35:22
  14. Panzer, M.: Designing identifiers for the DDC (2007) 0.03
    0.029398328 = product of:
      0.04409749 = sum of:
        0.02340203 = weight(_text_:to in 1752) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02340203 = score(doc=1752,freq=44.0), product of:
            0.08279609 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.818051 = idf(docFreq=19512, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045541126 = queryNorm
            0.28264657 = fieldWeight in 1752, product of:
              6.6332498 = tf(freq=44.0), with freq of:
                44.0 = termFreq=44.0
              1.818051 = idf(docFreq=19512, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=1752)
        0.020695461 = product of:
          0.041390922 = sum of:
            0.041390922 = weight(_text_:22 in 1752) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.041390922 = score(doc=1752,freq=10.0), product of:
                0.15947726 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045541126 = queryNorm
                0.2595412 = fieldWeight in 1752, product of:
                  3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                    10.0 = termFreq=10.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=1752)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Content
    "Although the Dewey Decimal Classification is currently available on the web to subscribers as WebDewey and Abridged WebDewey in the OCLC Connexion service and in an XML version to licensees, OCLC does not provide any "web services" based on the DDC. By web services, we mean presentation of the DDC to other machines (not humans) for uses such as searching, browsing, classifying, mapping, harvesting, and alerting. In order to build web-accessible services based on the DDC, several elements have to be considered. One of these elements is the design of an appropriate Uniform Resource Identifier (URI) structure for Dewey. The design goals of mapping the entity model of the DDC into an identifier space can be summarized as follows: * Common locator for Dewey concepts and associated resources for use in web services and web applications * Use-case-driven, but not directly related to and outlasting a specific use case (persistency) * Retraceable path to a concept rather than an abstract identification, reusing a means of identification that is already present in the DDC and available in existing metadata. We have been working closely with our colleagues in the OCLC Office of Research (especially Andy Houghton as well as Eric Childress, Diane Vizine-Goetz, and Stu Weibel) on a preliminary identifier syntax. The basic identifier format we are currently exploring is: http://dewey.info/{aspect}/{object}/{locale}/{type}/{version}/{resource} where * {aspect} is the aspect associated with an {object}-the current value set of aspect contains "concept", "scheme", and "index"; additional ones are under exploration * {object} is a type of {aspect} * {locale} identifies a Dewey translation * {type} identifies a Dewey edition type and contains, at a minimum, the values "edn" for the full edition or "abr" for the abridged edition * {version} identifies a Dewey edition version * {resource} identifies a resource associated with an {object} in the context of {locale}, {type}, and {version}
    Some examples of identifiers for concepts follow: <http://dewey.info/concept/338.4/en/edn/22/> This identifier is used to retrieve or identify the 338.4 concept in the English-language version of Edition 22. <http://dewey.info/concept/338.4/de/edn/22/> This identifier is used to retrieve or identify the 338.4 concept in the German-language version of Edition 22. <http://dewey.info/concept/333.7-333.9/> This identifier is used to retrieve or identify the 333.7-333.9 concept across all editions and language versions. <http://dewey.info/concept/333.7-333.9/about.skos> This identifier is used to retrieve a SKOS representation of the 333.7-333.9 concept (using the "resource" element). There are several open issues at this preliminary stage of development: Use cases: URIs need to represent the range of statements or questions that could be submitted to a Dewey web service. Therefore, it seems that some general questions have to be answered first: What information does an agent have when coming to a Dewey web service? What kind of questions will such an agent ask? Placement of the {locale} component: It is still an open question if the {locale} component should be placed after the {version} component instead (<http://dewey.info/concept/338.4/edn/22/en>) to emphasize that the most important instantiation of a Dewey class is its edition, not its language version. From a services point of view, however, it could make more sense to keep the current arrangement, because users are more likely to come to the service with a present understanding of the language version they are seeking without knowing the specifics of a certain edition in which they are trying to find topics. Identification of other Dewey entities: The goal is to create a locator that does not answer all, but a lot of questions that could be asked about the DDC. Which entities are missing but should be surfaced for services or user agents? How will those services or agents interact with them? Should some entities be rendered in a different way as presented? For example, (how) should the DDC Summaries be retrievable? Would it be necessary to make the DDC Manual accessible through this identifier structure?"
  15. Bensman, S.J.: Eugene Garfield, Francis Narin, and PageRank : the theoretical bases of the Google search engine (2013) 0.03
    0.028997809 = product of:
      0.043496713 = sum of:
        0.018815938 = weight(_text_:to in 1149) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.018815938 = score(doc=1149,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.08279609 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.818051 = idf(docFreq=19512, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045541126 = queryNorm
            0.22725637 = fieldWeight in 1149, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.818051 = idf(docFreq=19512, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1149)
        0.024680775 = product of:
          0.04936155 = sum of:
            0.04936155 = weight(_text_:22 in 1149) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04936155 = score(doc=1149,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15947726 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045541126 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1149, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1149)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    This paper presents a test of the validity of using Google Scholar to evaluate the publications of researchers by comparing the premises on which its search engine, PageRank, is based, to those of Garfield's theory of citation indexing. It finds that the premises are identical and that PageRank and Garfield's theory of citation indexing validate each other.
    Date
    17.12.2013 11:02:22
  16. Mitchell, J.S.; Zeng, M.L.; Zumer, M.: Modeling classification systems in multicultural and multilingual contexts (2012) 0.03
    0.02897431 = product of:
      0.043461464 = sum of:
        0.017283546 = weight(_text_:to in 1967) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.017283546 = score(doc=1967,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.08279609 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.818051 = idf(docFreq=19512, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045541126 = queryNorm
            0.20874833 = fieldWeight in 1967, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.818051 = idf(docFreq=19512, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1967)
        0.026177917 = product of:
          0.052355833 = sum of:
            0.052355833 = weight(_text_:22 in 1967) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.052355833 = score(doc=1967,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.15947726 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045541126 = queryNorm
                0.32829654 = fieldWeight in 1967, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1967)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    This paper reports on the second part of an initiative of the authors on researching classification systems with the conceptual model defined by the Functional Requirements for Subject Authority Data (FRSAD) final report. In an earlier study, the authors explored whether the FRSAD conceptual model could be extended beyond subject authority data to model classification data. The focus of the current study is to determine if classification data modeled using FRSAD can be used to solve real-world discovery problems in multicultural and multilingual contexts. The paper discusses the relationships between entities (same type or different types) in the context of classification systems that involve multiple translations and /or multicultural implementations. Results of two case studies are presented in detail: (a) two instances of the DDC (DDC 22 in English, and the Swedish-English mixed translation of DDC 22), and (b) Chinese Library Classification. The use cases of conceptual models in practice are also discussed.
  17. Priss, U.: Faceted knowledge representation (1999) 0.03
    0.027839875 = product of:
      0.04175981 = sum of:
        0.020164136 = weight(_text_:to in 2654) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.020164136 = score(doc=2654,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.08279609 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.818051 = idf(docFreq=19512, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045541126 = queryNorm
            0.24353972 = fieldWeight in 2654, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.818051 = idf(docFreq=19512, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2654)
        0.021595677 = product of:
          0.043191355 = sum of:
            0.043191355 = weight(_text_:22 in 2654) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.043191355 = score(doc=2654,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15947726 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045541126 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2654, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2654)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    Faceted Knowledge Representation provides a formalism for implementing knowledge systems. The basic notions of faceted knowledge representation are "unit", "relation", "facet" and "interpretation". Units are atomic elements and can be abstract elements or refer to external objects in an application. Relations are sequences or matrices of 0 and 1's (binary matrices). Facets are relational structures that combine units and relations. Each facet represents an aspect or viewpoint of a knowledge system. Interpretations are mappings that can be used to translate between different representations. This paper introduces the basic notions of faceted knowledge representation. The formalism is applied here to an abstract modeling of a faceted thesaurus as used in information retrieval.
    Date
    22. 1.2016 17:30:31
  18. Si, L.E.; O'Brien, A.; Probets, S.: Integration of distributed terminology resources to facilitate subject cross-browsing for library portal systems (2009) 0.03
    0.027814373 = product of:
      0.04172156 = sum of:
        0.026296074 = weight(_text_:to in 3628) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.026296074 = score(doc=3628,freq=20.0), product of:
            0.08279609 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.818051 = idf(docFreq=19512, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045541126 = queryNorm
            0.31760043 = fieldWeight in 3628, product of:
              4.472136 = tf(freq=20.0), with freq of:
                20.0 = termFreq=20.0
              1.818051 = idf(docFreq=19512, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3628)
        0.015425485 = product of:
          0.03085097 = sum of:
            0.03085097 = weight(_text_:22 in 3628) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03085097 = score(doc=3628,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15947726 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045541126 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 3628, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3628)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    Purpose: To develop a prototype middleware framework between different terminology resources in order to provide a subject cross-browsing service for library portal systems. Design/methodology/approach: Nine terminology experts were interviewed to collect appropriate knowledge to support the development of a theoretical framework for the research. Based on this, a simplified software-based prototype system was constructed incorporating the knowledge acquired. The prototype involved mappings between the computer science schedule of the Dewey Decimal Classification (which acted as a spine) and two controlled vocabularies UKAT and ACM Computing Classification. Subsequently, six further experts in the field were invited to evaluate the prototype system and provide feedback to improve the framework. Findings: The major findings showed that given the large variety of terminology resources distributed on the web, the proposed middleware service is essential to integrate technically and semantically the different terminology resources in order to facilitate subject cross-browsing. A set of recommendations are also made outlining the important approaches and features that support such a cross browsing middleware service.
    Content
    This paper is a pre-print version presented at the ISKO UK 2009 conference, 22-23 June, prior to peer review and editing. For published proceedings see special issue of Aslib Proceedings journal.
  19. Hollink, L.; Assem, M. van: Estimating the relevance of search results in the Culture-Web : a study of semantic distance measures (2010) 0.03
    0.027215695 = product of:
      0.04082354 = sum of:
        0.02231296 = weight(_text_:to in 4649) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02231296 = score(doc=4649,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.08279609 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.818051 = idf(docFreq=19512, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045541126 = queryNorm
            0.26949292 = fieldWeight in 4649, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              1.818051 = idf(docFreq=19512, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4649)
        0.018510582 = product of:
          0.037021164 = sum of:
            0.037021164 = weight(_text_:22 in 4649) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.037021164 = score(doc=4649,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15947726 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045541126 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4649, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4649)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    More and more cultural heritage institutions publish their collections, vocabularies and metadata on the Web. The resulting Web of linked cultural data opens up exciting new possibilities for searching and browsing through these cultural heritage collections. We report on ongoing work in which we investigate the estimation of relevance in this Web of Culture. We study existing measures of semantic distance and how they apply to two use cases. The use cases relate to the structured, multilingual and multimodal nature of the Culture Web. We distinguish between measures using the Web, such as Google distance and PMI, and measures using the Linked Data Web, i.e. the semantic structure of metadata vocabularies. We perform a small study in which we compare these semantic distance measures to human judgements of relevance. Although it is too early to draw any definitive conclusions, the study provides new insights into the applicability of semantic distance measures to the Web of Culture, and clear starting points for further research.
    Date
    26.12.2011 13:40:22
  20. Bittner, T.; Donnelly, M.; Winter, S.: Ontology and semantic interoperability (2006) 0.03
    0.027215695 = product of:
      0.04082354 = sum of:
        0.02231296 = weight(_text_:to in 4820) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02231296 = score(doc=4820,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.08279609 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.818051 = idf(docFreq=19512, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045541126 = queryNorm
            0.26949292 = fieldWeight in 4820, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              1.818051 = idf(docFreq=19512, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4820)
        0.018510582 = product of:
          0.037021164 = sum of:
            0.037021164 = weight(_text_:22 in 4820) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.037021164 = score(doc=4820,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15947726 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045541126 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4820, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4820)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    One of the major problems facing systems for Computer Aided Design (CAD), Architecture Engineering and Construction (AEC) and Geographic Information Systems (GIS) applications today is the lack of interoperability among the various systems. When integrating software applications, substantial di culties can arise in translating information from one application to the other. In this paper, we focus on semantic di culties that arise in software integration. Applications may use di erent terminologies to describe the same domain. Even when appli-cations use the same terminology, they often associate di erent semantics with the terms. This obstructs information exchange among applications. To cir-cumvent this obstacle, we need some way of explicitly specifying the semantics for each terminology in an unambiguous fashion. Ontologies can provide such specification. It will be the task of this paper to explain what ontologies are and how they can be used to facilitate interoperability between software systems used in computer aided design, architecture engineering and construction, and geographic information processing.
    Date
    3.12.2016 18:39:22

Years

Languages

Types

  • a 490
  • r 21
  • s 18
  • i 17
  • n 14
  • p 13
  • x 12
  • m 9
  • b 5
  • More… Less…

Themes