Search (4 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Day, M."
  1. Day, M.: Resource discovery, interoperability and digital preservation : some aspects of current metadata research and development (2000) 0.05
    0.053974956 = product of:
      0.10794991 = sum of:
        0.10794991 = product of:
          0.21589983 = sum of:
            0.21589983 = weight(_text_:discovery in 4901) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.21589983 = score(doc=4901,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.26668423 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.2338576 = idf(docFreq=640, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050953664 = queryNorm
                0.809571 = fieldWeight in 4901, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  5.2338576 = idf(docFreq=640, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4901)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  2. Heery, R.; Powell, A.; Day, M.: Metadata (1997) 0.05
    0.053421356 = product of:
      0.10684271 = sum of:
        0.10684271 = product of:
          0.21368542 = sum of:
            0.21368542 = weight(_text_:discovery in 2883) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.21368542 = score(doc=2883,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.26668423 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.2338576 = idf(docFreq=640, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050953664 = queryNorm
                0.80126756 = fieldWeight in 2883, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  5.2338576 = idf(docFreq=640, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2883)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Examines metadata within the context of network information management. Defines metadata, gives an overview of resource discovery service model in the context of the Web, and gives a simple typology of resource discovery metadata and the associated characteristics of metadata formats. Describes some of the projects and services, which are now using metadata for resource discovery in a networked environment. Covers: the Dublin Core, Web indexes, projects and services using metadata, associated technologies, and use of identifiers
  3. Day, M.; Koch, T.: ¬The role of classification schemes in Internet resource description and discovery : DESIRE - Development of a European Service for Information on Research and Education. Specification for resource description methods, part 3 (1997) 0.04
    0.038553543 = product of:
      0.07710709 = sum of:
        0.07710709 = product of:
          0.15421417 = sum of:
            0.15421417 = weight(_text_:discovery in 3067) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.15421417 = score(doc=3067,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.26668423 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.2338576 = idf(docFreq=640, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050953664 = queryNorm
                0.5782651 = fieldWeight in 3067, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  5.2338576 = idf(docFreq=640, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3067)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  4. Heery, R.; Carpenter, L.; Day, M.: Renardus project developments and the wider digital library context (2001) 0.01
    0.013630736 = product of:
      0.027261471 = sum of:
        0.027261471 = product of:
          0.054522943 = sum of:
            0.054522943 = weight(_text_:discovery in 1219) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.054522943 = score(doc=1219,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.26668423 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.2338576 = idf(docFreq=640, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050953664 = queryNorm
                0.20444757 = fieldWeight in 1219, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  5.2338576 = idf(docFreq=640, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=1219)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    The Renardus project has brought together gateways that are 'large-scale national initiatives'. Within the European context this immediately introduces a diversity of organisations, as responsibility for national gateway initiatives is located differently, for example, in national libraries, national agencies with responsibility for educational technology infrastructure, and within universities or consortia of universities. Within the project, gateways are in some cases represented directly by their own personnel, in some cases by other departments or research centres, but not always by the people responsible for providing the gateway service. For example, the UK Resource Discovery Network (RDN) is represented in the project by UKOLN (formerly part of the Resource Discovery Network Centre) and the Institute of Learning and Research Technology (ILRT), University of Bristol -- an RDN 'hub' service provider -- who are primarily responsible for dissemination. Since the start of the project there have been changes within the organisational structures providing gateways and within the service ambitions of gateways themselves. Such lack of stability is inherent within the Internet service environment, and this presents challenges to Renardus activity that has to be planned for a three-year period. For example, within the gateway's funding environment there is now an exploration of 'subject portals' offering more extended services than gateways. There is also potential commercial interest for including gateways as a value-added component to existing commercial services, and new offerings from possible competitors such as Google's Web Directory and country based services. This short update on the Renardus project intends to inform the reader of progress within the project and to give some wider context to its main themes by locating the project within the broader arena of digital library activity. There are twelve partners in the project from Denmark, Finland, France, Germany, the Netherlands and Sweden, as well as the UK. In particular we will focus on the specific activity in which UKOLN is involved: the architectural design, the specification of functional requirements, reaching consensus on a collaborative business model, etc. We will also consider issues of metadata management where all partners have interests. We will highlight implementation issues that connect to areas of debate elsewhere. In particular we see connections with activity related to establishing architectural models for digital library services, connections to the services that may emerge from metadata sharing using the Open Archives Initiative metadata sharing protocol, and links with work elsewhere on navigation of digital information spaces by means of controlled vocabularies.