Search (23 results, page 1 of 2)

  • × theme_ss:"Citation indexing"
  1. Tay, A.: ¬The next generation discovery citation indexes : a review of the landscape in 2020 (2020) 0.10 
    0.10049444 = product of:
  0.20098887 = sum of:
    0.20098887 = sum of:
      0.15266424 = weight(_text_:discovery in 40) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.15266424 = score(doc=40,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.26668423 = queryWeight, product of:
            5.2338576 = idf(docFreq=640, maxDocs=44218)
            0.050953664 = queryNorm
          0.5724532 = fieldWeight in 40, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            5.2338576 = idf(docFreq=640, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=40)
      0.048324626 = weight(_text_:22 in 40) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.048324626 = score(doc=40,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.17843105 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.050953664 = queryNorm
          0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 40, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=40)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    17.11.2020 12:22:59
    Source
    http://musingsaboutlibrarianship.blogspot.com/2020/11/the-next-generation-discovery-citation.html
  2. Ding, Y.; Zhang, G.; Chambers, T.; Song, M.; Wang, X.; Zhai, C.: Content-based citation analysis : the next generation of citation analysis (2014) 0.07 
    0.066974804 = product of:
  0.13394961 = sum of:
    0.13394961 = sum of:
      0.0925285 = weight(_text_:discovery in 1521) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.0925285 = score(doc=1521,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.26668423 = queryWeight, product of:
            5.2338576 = idf(docFreq=640, maxDocs=44218)
            0.050953664 = queryNorm
          0.34695902 = fieldWeight in 1521, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            5.2338576 = idf(docFreq=640, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1521)
      0.041421108 = weight(_text_:22 in 1521) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.041421108 = score(doc=1521,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.17843105 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.050953664 = queryNorm
          0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1521, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1521)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Traditional citation analysis has been widely applied to detect patterns of scientific collaboration, map the landscapes of scholarly disciplines, assess the impact of research outputs, and observe knowledge transfer across domains. It is, however, limited, as it assumes all citations are of similar value and weights each equally. Content-based citation analysis (CCA) addresses a citation's value by interpreting each one based on its context at both the syntactic and semantic levels. This paper provides a comprehensive overview of CAA research in terms of its theoretical foundations, methodical approaches, and example applications. In addition, we highlight how increased computational capabilities and publicly available full-text resources have opened this area of research to vast possibilities, which enable deeper citation analysis, more accurate citation prediction, and increased knowledge discovery.
    Date
    22. 8.2014 16:52:04
  3. Nicolaisen, J.: Citation analysis (2007) 0.03 
    0.027614072 = product of:
  0.055228144 = sum of:
    0.055228144 = product of:
      0.11045629 = sum of:
        0.11045629 = weight(_text_:22 in 6091) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.11045629 = score(doc=6091,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17843105 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050953664 = queryNorm
            0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 6091, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=6091)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    13. 7.2008 19:53:22
  4. Døsen, K.: One more reference on self-reference (1992) 0.03 
    0.027614072 = product of:
  0.055228144 = sum of:
    0.055228144 = product of:
      0.11045629 = sum of:
        0.11045629 = weight(_text_:22 in 4604) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.11045629 = score(doc=4604,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17843105 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050953664 = queryNorm
            0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 4604, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4604)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    7. 2.2005 14:10:22
  5. Van der Veer Martens, B.: Do citation systems represent theories of truth? (2001) 0.02 
    0.024407621 = product of:
  0.048815243 = sum of:
    0.048815243 = product of:
      0.097630486 = sum of:
        0.097630486 = weight(_text_:22 in 3925) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.097630486 = score(doc=3925,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.17843105 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050953664 = queryNorm
            0.54716086 = fieldWeight in 3925, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3925)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    22. 7.2006 15:22:28
  6. New Web Citation Index (2004) 0.02 
    0.023132125 = product of:
  0.04626425 = sum of:
    0.04626425 = product of:
      0.0925285 = sum of:
        0.0925285 = weight(_text_:discovery in 2270) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0925285 = score(doc=2270,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.26668423 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.2338576 = idf(docFreq=640, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050953664 = queryNorm
            0.34695902 = fieldWeight in 2270, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.2338576 = idf(docFreq=640, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2270)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Philadelphia, PA USA-London UK-Princeton, NJ February, 25, 2004 - Today, Thomson ISI and NEC Laboratories America (NEC) announced their collaboration to create a comprehensive, multidisciplinary citation index for Web-based scholarly resources. The new Web Citation Index(tm) will combine a suite of technologies developed by NEC, including "autonomous citation indexing" tools from NEC's CiteSeer environment, with the capabilities underlying ISI Web of KnowledgeSM. Thomson ISI editors will carefully monitor the quality of this new resource to ensure all indexed material meets the Thomson ISI high-quality standards. During 2004, Thomson ISI and NEC will operate a pilot of the new resource to receive feedback from the scientific and scholarly community. Full access to the index is projected for early 2005. When fully operational, the new resource will be a unique content collection within ISI Web of Knowledge. It will complement the Thomson ISI Web of Science(r), and provide researchers with a new gateway to discovery 4/3 using citation relationships among Web-based documents, such as pre-prints, proceedings, and "open access" research publications.
  7. Marshakova-Shaikevich, I.: Bibliometric maps of field of science (2005) 0.02 
    0.023132125 = product of:
  0.04626425 = sum of:
    0.04626425 = product of:
      0.0925285 = sum of:
        0.0925285 = weight(_text_:discovery in 1069) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0925285 = score(doc=1069,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.26668423 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.2338576 = idf(docFreq=640, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050953664 = queryNorm
            0.34695902 = fieldWeight in 1069, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.2338576 = idf(docFreq=640, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1069)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    The present paper is devoted to two directions in algorithmic classificatory procedures: the journal co-citation analysis as an example of citation networks and lexical analysis of keywords in the titles and texts. What is common to those approaches is the general idea of normalization of deviations of the observed data from the mathematical expectation. The application of the same formula leads to discovery of statistically significant links between objects (journals in one case, keywords - in the other). The results of the journal co-citation analysis are reflected in tables and map for field "Women's Studies" and for field "Information Science and Library Science". An experimental attempt at establishing textual links between words was carried out on two samples from SSCI Data base: (1) EDUCATION and (2) ETHICS. The EDUCATION file included 2180 documents (of which 751 had abstracts); the ETHICS file included 807 documents (289 abstracts). Some examples of the results of this pilot study are given in tabular form . The binary links between words discovered in this way may form triplets or other groups with more than two member words.
  8. Garfield, E.; Stock, W.G.: Citation Consciousness : Interview with Eugene Garfiels, chairman emeritus of ISI; Philadelphia (2002) 0.02 
    0.017258795 = product of:
  0.03451759 = sum of:
    0.03451759 = product of:
      0.06903518 = sum of:
        0.06903518 = weight(_text_:22 in 613) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06903518 = score(doc=613,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17843105 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050953664 = queryNorm
            0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 613, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=613)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    Password. 2002, H.6, S.22-25
  9. Chen, C.: Mapping scientific frontiers : the quest for knowledge visualization (2003) 0.02 
    0.015421417 = product of:
  0.030842833 = sum of:
    0.030842833 = product of:
      0.061685666 = sum of:
        0.061685666 = weight(_text_:discovery in 2213) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.061685666 = score(doc=2213,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.26668423 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.2338576 = idf(docFreq=640, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050953664 = queryNorm
            0.23130602 = fieldWeight in 2213, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.2338576 = idf(docFreq=640, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2213)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Footnote
    The title of Chapter 5, On the Shoulders of Giants, implies that knowledge of the structure of scientific frontiers in the immediate past holds the key to a fruitful exploration of people's intellectual assets. Chapter 6, Tracing Competing Paradigms explains how information visualization can draw upon the philosophical framework of paradigm shifts and thereby enable scientists to track the development of Competing paradigms. The final chapter, Tracking Latent Domain Knowledge, turns citation analysis upside down by looking at techniques that may reveal latent domain knowledge. Mapping Scientific Frontiers: The Quest for Knowledge Visualization is an excellent book and is highly recommended. The book convincingly outlines general theories conceming cartography, visual communication, and science mapping-especially how metaphors can make a "big picture"simple and useful. The author likewise Shows how the GSA framework is based not only an technical possibilities but indeed also an the visualization principles presented in the beginning chapters. Also, the author does a fine job of explaining why the mapping of scientific frontiers needs a combined effort from a diverse range of underlying disciplines, such as philosophy of science, sociology of science, scientometrics, domain analyses, information visualization, knowledge discovery, and data mining.
  10. Larivière, V.; Gingras, Y.; Archambault, E.: ¬The decline in the concentration of citations, 1900-2007 (2009) 0.01 
    0.014644574 = product of:
  0.029289149 = sum of:
    0.029289149 = product of:
      0.058578297 = sum of:
        0.058578297 = weight(_text_:22 in 2763) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.058578297 = score(doc=2763,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.17843105 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050953664 = queryNorm
            0.32829654 = fieldWeight in 2763, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2763)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    22. 3.2009 19:22:35
  11. Bensman, S.J.: Eugene Garfield, Francis Narin, and PageRank : the theoretical bases of the Google search engine (2013) 0.01 
    0.013807036 = product of:
  0.027614072 = sum of:
    0.027614072 = product of:
      0.055228144 = sum of:
        0.055228144 = weight(_text_:22 in 1149) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.055228144 = score(doc=1149,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17843105 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050953664 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1149, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1149)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    17.12.2013 11:02:22
  12. Garfield, E.: Recollections of Irving H. Sher 1924-1996 : Polymath/information scientist extraordinaire (2001) 0.01 
    0.0120811565 = product of:
  0.024162313 = sum of:
    0.024162313 = product of:
      0.048324626 = sum of:
        0.048324626 = weight(_text_:22 in 6920) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.048324626 = score(doc=6920,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17843105 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050953664 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 6920, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6920)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    16.12.2001 14:01:22
  13. Van der Veer Martens, B.; Goodrum, G.: ¬The diffusion of theories : a functional approach (2006) 0.01 
    0.0120811565 = product of:
  0.024162313 = sum of:
    0.024162313 = product of:
      0.048324626 = sum of:
        0.048324626 = weight(_text_:22 in 5269) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.048324626 = score(doc=5269,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17843105 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050953664 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 5269, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5269)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    22. 7.2006 15:20:01
  14. Campanario, J.M.: Have referees rejected some of the most-cited articles of all times? (1996) 0.01 
    0.010355277 = product of:
  0.020710554 = sum of:
    0.020710554 = product of:
      0.041421108 = sum of:
        0.041421108 = weight(_text_:22 in 4215) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.041421108 = score(doc=4215,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17843105 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050953664 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4215, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4215)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    In this article a quantitative study is reported on the resistance that scientists may encounter when they do innovative work or when they attempt to publish articles that later become highly cited. A set of 205 commentaries by authors of some of the most-cited papers of all times have been examined in order to identify those articles whose authors encountered difficulty in getting his or her work published. There are 22 commentaries (10,7%) in which authors mention some difficulty or resistance in doing or publishing the research reported in the article. Three of the articles which had problems in being published are the most cited from their respective journals. According the authors' commentaries, although sometimes referees' negative evaluations can help improve the articles, in other instances referees and editors wrongly rejected the highly cited articles
  15. Snyder, H.; Bonzi, S.: Patterns of self-citation across disciplines : 1980-1989 (1998) 0.01 
    0.010355277 = product of:
  0.020710554 = sum of:
    0.020710554 = product of:
      0.041421108 = sum of:
        0.041421108 = weight(_text_:22 in 3692) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.041421108 = score(doc=3692,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17843105 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050953664 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3692, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3692)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    22. 5.1999 19:33:24
  16. wst: Cut-and-paste-Wissenschaft (2003) 0.01 
    0.010355277 = product of:
  0.020710554 = sum of:
    0.020710554 = product of:
      0.041421108 = sum of:
        0.041421108 = weight(_text_:22 in 1270) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.041421108 = score(doc=1270,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17843105 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050953664 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1270, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1270)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Content
    "Mikhail Simkin und Vwani Roychowdhury von der University of Califomia, Los Angeles, haben eine in der wissenschaftlichen Gemeinschaft verbreitete Unsitte erstmals quantitativ erfasst. Die Wissenschaftler analysierten die Verbreitung von Druckfehlern in den Literaturlisten wissenschaftlicher Arbeiten (www.arxiv.org/abs/cond-mat/0212043). 78 Prozent aller zitierten Aufsätze - so schätzen die Forscher - haben die zitierenden Wissenschaftler demnach nicht gelesen, sondern nur per 'cut and paste' von einer Vorlage in ihre eigene Literaturliste übernommen. Das könne man beispielsweise abschätzen aus der Analyse fehlerhafter Seitenangaben in der Literaturliste eines 1973 veröffentlichten Aufsatzes über die Struktur zweidimensionaler Kristalle: Dieser Aufsatz ist rund 4300 mal zitiert worden. In 196 Fällen enthalten die Zitate jedoch Fehler in der Jahreszahl, dem Band der Zeitschrift oder der Seitenzahl, die als Indikatoren für cut and paste genommen werden können, denn man kann, obwohl es Milliarden Möglichkeiten gibt, nur 45 verschiedene Arten von Druckfehlern unterscheiden. In erster Näherung ergibt sich eine Obergrenze für die Zahl der `echten Leser' daher aus der Zahl der unterscheidbaren Druckfehler (45) geteilt durch die Gesamtzahl der Publikationen mit Druckfehler (196), das macht etwa 22 Prozent."
  17. Chan, H.C.; Kim, H.-W.; Tan, W.C.: Information systems citation patterns from International Conference on Information Systems articles (2006) 0.01 
    0.010355277 = product of:
  0.020710554 = sum of:
    0.020710554 = product of:
      0.041421108 = sum of:
        0.041421108 = weight(_text_:22 in 201) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.041421108 = score(doc=201,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17843105 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050953664 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 201, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=201)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    3. 1.2007 17:22:03
  18. H-Index auch im Web of Science (2008) 0.01 
    0.010355277 = product of:
  0.020710554 = sum of:
    0.020710554 = product of:
      0.041421108 = sum of:
        0.041421108 = weight(_text_:22 in 590) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.041421108 = score(doc=590,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17843105 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050953664 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 590, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=590)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    6. 4.2008 19:04:22
  19. Mingers, J.; Burrell, Q.L.: Modeling citation behavior in Management Science journals (2006) 0.01 
    0.010355277 = product of:
  0.020710554 = sum of:
    0.020710554 = product of:
      0.041421108 = sum of:
        0.041421108 = weight(_text_:22 in 994) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.041421108 = score(doc=994,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17843105 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050953664 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 994, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=994)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    26.12.2007 19:22:05
  20. Ma, N.; Guan, J.; Zhao, Y.: Bringing PageRank to the citation analysis (2008) 0.01 
    0.010355277 = product of:
  0.020710554 = sum of:
    0.020710554 = product of:
      0.041421108 = sum of:
        0.041421108 = weight(_text_:22 in 2064) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.041421108 = score(doc=2064,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17843105 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050953664 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2064, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2064)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    31. 7.2008 14:22:05

Authors

Years

Languages

  • e 17
  • d 6

Types

  • a 22
  • el 3
  • m 1
  • More… Less…

Themes