Search (6 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Dunsire, G."
  1. Dunsire, G.: ¬The Internet as a tool for cataloguing and classification, a view from the UK (2000) 0.03
    0.03084049 = product of:
      0.09252147 = sum of:
        0.09252147 = weight(_text_:reference in 6062) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.09252147 = score(doc=6062,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.205834 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.0683694 = idf(docFreq=2055, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050593734 = queryNorm
            0.44949555 = fieldWeight in 6062, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.0683694 = idf(docFreq=2055, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=6062)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    The use of various Internet services by library cataloguers and subject classifiers is discussed, with special reference to Scotland and the remainder of the United Kingdom. Services include e-mail, FTP, and Websites
  2. Dunsire, G.; Fritz, D.; Fritz, R.: Instructions, interfaces, and interoperable data : the RIMMF experience with RDA revisited (2020) 0.02
    0.02158834 = product of:
      0.06476502 = sum of:
        0.06476502 = weight(_text_:reference in 5751) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06476502 = score(doc=5751,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.205834 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.0683694 = idf(docFreq=2055, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050593734 = queryNorm
            0.31464687 = fieldWeight in 5751, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.0683694 = idf(docFreq=2055, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5751)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    This article presents a case study of RIMMF, a software tool developed to improve the orientation and training of catalogers who use Resource Description and Access (RDA) to maintain bibliographic data. The cataloging guidance and instructions of RDA are based on the Functional Requirements conceptual models that are now consolidated in the IFLA Library Reference Model, but many catalogers are applying RDA in systems that have evolved from inventory and text-processing applications developed from older metadata paradigms. The article describes how RIMMF interacts with the RDA Toolkit and RDA Registry to offer cataloger-friendly multilingual data input and editing interfaces.
  3. Dunsire, G.: Interoperability and semantics in RDF representations of FRBR, FRAD and FRSAD (2011) 0.02
    0.015420245 = product of:
      0.046260733 = sum of:
        0.046260733 = weight(_text_:reference in 651) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.046260733 = score(doc=651,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.205834 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.0683694 = idf(docFreq=2055, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050593734 = queryNorm
            0.22474778 = fieldWeight in 651, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.0683694 = idf(docFreq=2055, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=651)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    This paper describes recent work on registering Resource Description Framework (RDF) versions of the entities and relationships from the Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records (FRBR) and Functional Requirements for Authority Data (FRAD) models developed by the International Federation of Library Associations and Institutions (IFLA). FRBR was developed several years before FRAD, and is under-developed in areas which FRAD was expected to cover; FRAD therefore makes significance reference to FRBR. Similarly, FRAD leaves a full treatment of subject authority data to the ongoing development of Functional Requirements for Subject Authority Data (FRSAD) which was finalised during 2010. Although the FRBR Review Group is charged with consolidating all three models in due course, the RDF versions of FRBR, FRAD, and FRSAD are being created in separate namespaces, with a separate Web Ontology Language (OWL) ontology to connect the three models. The paper discusses interoperability issues arising from this work. Such issues include class definitions and sub-classes, reciprocal properties, and disjoint classes and properties. The paper discusses similar work on the International Standard Bibliographic Description (ISBD), also maintained by IFLA, and related issues arising from the RDF representation of the metadata element set of RDA: resource description and access, which is based on the FRBR and FRAD models. The work is ongoing, and the paper updates the original conference presentation to the end of October 2010.
  4. Dunsire, G.; Willer, M.: Initiatives to make standard library metadata models and structures available to the Semantic Web (2010) 0.01
    0.012336196 = product of:
      0.037008587 = sum of:
        0.037008587 = weight(_text_:reference in 3965) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.037008587 = score(doc=3965,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.205834 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.0683694 = idf(docFreq=2055, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050593734 = queryNorm
            0.17979822 = fieldWeight in 3965, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.0683694 = idf(docFreq=2055, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3965)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    This paper describes recent initiatives to make standard library metadata models and structures available to the Semantic Web, including IFLA standards such as Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records (FRBR), Functional Requirements for Authority Data (FRAD), and International Standard Bibliographic Description (ISBD) along with the infrastructure that supports them. The FRBR Review Group is currently developing representations of FRAD and the entityrelationship model of FRBR in resource description framework (RDF) applications, using a combination of RDF, RDF Schema (RDFS), Simple Knowledge Organisation System (SKOS) and Web Ontology Language (OWL), cross-relating both models where appropriate. The ISBD/XML Task Group is investigating the representation of ISBD in RDF. The IFLA Namespaces project is developing an administrative and technical infrastructure to support such initiatives and encourage uptake of standards by other agencies. The paper describes similar initiatives with related external standards such as RDA - resource description and access, REICAT (the new Italian cataloguing rules) and CIDOC Conceptual Reference Model (CRM). The DCMI RDA Task Group is working with the Joint Steering Committee for RDA to develop Semantic Web representations of RDA structural elements, which are aligned with FRBR and FRAD, and controlled metadata content vocabularies. REICAT is also based on FRBR, and an object-oriented version of FRBR has been integrated with CRM, which itself has an RDF representation. CRM was initially based on the metadata needs of the museum community, and is now seeking extension to the archives community with the eventual aim of developing a model common to the main cultural information domains of archives, libraries and museums. The Vocabulary Mapping Framework (VMF) project has developed a Semantic Web tool to automatically generate mappings between metadata models from the information communities, including publishers. The tool is based on several standards, including CRM, FRAD, FRBR, MARC21 and RDA.
  5. Danskin, A.; Dunsire, G.; Edwards, S.: RDA international (2015) 0.01
    0.01065704 = product of:
      0.03197112 = sum of:
        0.03197112 = product of:
          0.06394224 = sum of:
            0.06394224 = weight(_text_:database in 2525) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06394224 = score(doc=2525,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.20452234 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.042444 = idf(docFreq=2109, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050593734 = queryNorm
                0.31264183 = fieldWeight in 2525, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.042444 = idf(docFreq=2109, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2525)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    RDA has always been a continually evolving standard that aims to reflect the requirements of the cataloguing community. Simon Edwards will highlight the steps towards a further internationalisation and exploration of wider cultural heritage description communities. Gordon Dunsire will point out the potential implementations of RDA data in various database structures and describes the possibilities for further work with RDA and linked data scenarios in international communities. The third part of the article reflects the experience of the British Library in applying RDA in the last years. Alan Danskin gives an overview of the transition period from the project organization until training.
  6. Dunsire, G.; Nicholson, D.: Signposting the crossroads : terminology Web services and classification-based interoperability (2010) 0.01
    0.005712294 = product of:
      0.017136881 = sum of:
        0.017136881 = product of:
          0.034273762 = sum of:
            0.034273762 = weight(_text_:22 in 4066) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.034273762 = score(doc=4066,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17717063 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050593734 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 4066, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4066)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    6. 1.2011 19:22:48