Search (8 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Oppenheim, C."
  1. Norris, M.; Oppenheim, C.: ¬The h-index : a broad review of a new bibliometric indicator (2010) 0.03
    0.02664893 = product of:
      0.079946786 = sum of:
        0.079946786 = sum of:
          0.045673028 = weight(_text_:database in 4147) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.045673028 = score(doc=4147,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.20452234 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.042444 = idf(docFreq=2109, maxDocs=44218)
                0.050593734 = queryNorm
              0.2233156 = fieldWeight in 4147, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                4.042444 = idf(docFreq=2109, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4147)
          0.034273762 = weight(_text_:22 in 4147) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.034273762 = score(doc=4147,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17717063 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.050593734 = queryNorm
              0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 4147, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4147)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    Purpose - This review aims to show, broadly, how the h-index has become a subject of widespread debate, how it has spawned many variants and diverse applications since first introduced in 2005 and some of the issues in its use. Design/methodology/approach - The review drew on a range of material published in 1990 or so sources published since 2005. From these sources, a number of themes were identified and discussed ranging from the h-index's advantages to which citation database might be selected for its calculation. Findings - The analysis shows how the h-index has quickly established itself as a major subject of interest in the field of bibliometrics. Study of the index ranges from its mathematical underpinning to a range of variants perceived to address the indexes' shortcomings. The review illustrates how widely the index has been applied but also how care must be taken in its application. Originality/value - The use of bibliometric indicators to measure research performance continues, with the h-index as its latest addition. The use of the h-index, its variants and many applications to which it has been put are still at the exploratory stage. The review shows the breadth and diversity of this research and the need to verify the veracity of the h-index by more studies.
    Date
    8. 1.2011 19:22:13
  2. Oppenheim, C.: Recent EC initiatives on copyright (1993) 0.02
    0.02131408 = product of:
      0.06394224 = sum of:
        0.06394224 = product of:
          0.12788448 = sum of:
            0.12788448 = weight(_text_:database in 4279) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.12788448 = score(doc=4279,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.20452234 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.042444 = idf(docFreq=2109, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050593734 = queryNorm
                0.62528366 = fieldWeight in 4279, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.042444 = idf(docFreq=2109, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4279)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    Reviews the EC Draft Directive on Database Copyright, due to be approved in 1994
  3. Oppenheim, C.: Electronic copyright and the law librarian (1994) 0.02
    0.017224379 = product of:
      0.051673137 = sum of:
        0.051673137 = product of:
          0.10334627 = sum of:
            0.10334627 = weight(_text_:database in 759) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.10334627 = score(doc=759,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.20452234 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.042444 = idf(docFreq=2109, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050593734 = queryNorm
                0.5053055 = fieldWeight in 759, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  4.042444 = idf(docFreq=2109, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=759)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    Covers issues concerned with copyright in machine readable records such as electronic databases and their usage. computer software and electrocopying. Considers the position regarding copyright in abstracts, and whether online databases can be considered literary works. Highlights some key court cases concerning database and compilation copyright in both the US and Europe. Notes the complex copyright implications of multimedia information delivery, and particular concerns over the copying and piracy of computer software. A European directive on database copyright is in preparation
  4. Oppenheim, C.: ¬The implications of copyright legislation for electronic access to journal collections (1994) 0.01
    0.00913967 = product of:
      0.02741901 = sum of:
        0.02741901 = product of:
          0.05483802 = sum of:
            0.05483802 = weight(_text_:22 in 7245) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.05483802 = score(doc=7245,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17717063 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050593734 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 7245, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7245)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Source
    Journal of document and text management. 2(1994) no.1, S.10-22
  5. Oppenheim, C.: ¬An agenda for action to achieve the information society in the UK (1996) 0.01
    0.00913967 = product of:
      0.02741901 = sum of:
        0.02741901 = product of:
          0.05483802 = sum of:
            0.05483802 = weight(_text_:22 in 7670) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.05483802 = score(doc=7670,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17717063 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050593734 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 7670, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7670)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Source
    Journal of information science. 22(1996) no.6, S.407-421
  6. Oppenheim, C.: Intellectual property : legal and other issues (1997) 0.01
    0.006854752 = product of:
      0.020564256 = sum of:
        0.020564256 = product of:
          0.041128512 = sum of:
            0.041128512 = weight(_text_:22 in 42) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.041128512 = score(doc=42,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17717063 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050593734 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 42, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=42)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Source
    Information studies. 3(1997) no.1, S.5-22
  7. Oppenheim, C.: Electronic scholarly publishing and open access (2009) 0.01
    0.006854752 = product of:
      0.020564256 = sum of:
        0.020564256 = product of:
          0.041128512 = sum of:
            0.041128512 = weight(_text_:22 in 3662) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.041128512 = score(doc=3662,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17717063 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050593734 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3662, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3662)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    8. 7.2010 19:22:45
  8. Cross, C.; Oppenheim, C.: ¬A genre analysis of scientific abstracts (2006) 0.01
    0.006089737 = product of:
      0.018269211 = sum of:
        0.018269211 = product of:
          0.036538422 = sum of:
            0.036538422 = weight(_text_:database in 5603) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.036538422 = score(doc=5603,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.20452234 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.042444 = idf(docFreq=2109, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050593734 = queryNorm
                0.17865248 = fieldWeight in 5603, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.042444 = idf(docFreq=2109, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5603)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    Purpose - The purpose of the paper is to analyse the structure of a small number of abstracts that have appeared in the CABI database over a number of years, during which time the authorship of the abstracts changed from CABI editorial staff to journal article authors themselves. This paper reports a study of the semantic organisation and thematic structure of 12 abstracts from the field of protozoology in an effort to discover whether these abstracts followed generally agreed abstracting guidelines. Design/methodology/approach - The method adopted was a move analysis of the text of the abstracts. This move analysis revealed a five-move pattern: move 1 situates the research within the scientific community; move 2 introduces the research by either describing the main features of the research or presenting its purpose; move 3 describes the methodology; move 4 states the results; and move 5 draws conclusions or suggests practical applications. Findings - Thematic analysis shows that scientific abstract authors thematise their subject by referring to the discourse domain or the "real" world. Not all of the abstracts succeeded in following the guideline advice. However, there was general consistency regarding semantic organisation and thematic structure. Research limitations/implications - The research limitations were the small number of abstracts examined, from just one subject domain. Practical limitations - The practical implications are the need for abstracting services to be clearer and more prescriptive regarding how they want abstracts to be structured as the lack of formal training in abstract writing increases the risk of subjectivity and verbosity and reduces clarity in scientific abstracts. Another implication of the research are that abstracting and indexing services must ensure that they maintain abstract quality if they introduce policies of accepting author abstracts. This is important as there is probably little formal training in abstract writing for science students at present. Recommendations for further research are made. Originality/value - This paper reports a study of the semantic organisation and thematic structure of 12 abstracts from the field of protozoology.