Search (8 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Weinberg, B.H."
  1. Weinberg, B.H.: ¬The body of a reference work in relation to its index : an analysis of wordsmanship (1996) 0.12
    0.12454046 = product of:
      0.18681069 = sum of:
        0.14803435 = weight(_text_:reference in 6940) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.14803435 = score(doc=6940,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.205834 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.0683694 = idf(docFreq=2055, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050593734 = queryNorm
            0.71919286 = fieldWeight in 6940, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              4.0683694 = idf(docFreq=2055, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6940)
        0.038776334 = product of:
          0.07755267 = sum of:
            0.07755267 = weight(_text_:22 in 6940) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07755267 = score(doc=6940,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.17717063 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050593734 = queryNorm
                0.4377287 = fieldWeight in 6940, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6940)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    Wordmanship is a humorous dictionary cum index. Analyzing its structure, considers general aspects of the design of a reference work in relation to its index. Indexers should be consulted at the design stage of reference books, as they may suggest reversal of the primary entries, and the index entries; refine the cross-reference-structure; revise locator notation; and select appropriate typography
    Date
    8. 3.1997 20:22:25
    Source
    Indexer. 20(1996) no.1, S.18-22
  2. Weinberg, B.H.: ¬The earliest Hebrew citation indexes (1997) 0.03
    0.026169024 = product of:
      0.07850707 = sum of:
        0.07850707 = weight(_text_:reference in 86) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07850707 = score(doc=86,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.205834 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.0683694 = idf(docFreq=2055, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050593734 = queryNorm
            0.38140965 = fieldWeight in 86, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              4.0683694 = idf(docFreq=2055, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=86)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    The invention of the citation index was credited to Shepard (1873) and Shapiro described a legal citation index published in 1743. A similar index was embedded in the Talmud 2 centuries earlier (1546). The 1st Hebrew citation index to a printed book is dated 1511. The earliest Hebrew manuscript citation index, ascribed to Maimonides, dates from the 12th century. Considerable knowledge was assumed for users of these tools. The substantial knowledge of their compilers contrats with the semi-automatic production of modern citation indexes. The terms citation, quotation, reference, cross-reference, locator, and concordance are employed inconsistently in publications about Hebrew indexes. There is a lack of citation links between the secondary literature on Hebrew indexes and that of citation analysis
  3. Weinberg, B.H.: Computer-assisted database indexing : introduction (1993) 0.02
    0.018269213 = product of:
      0.054807637 = sum of:
        0.054807637 = product of:
          0.109615274 = sum of:
            0.109615274 = weight(_text_:database in 8094) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.109615274 = score(doc=8094,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.20452234 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.042444 = idf(docFreq=2109, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050593734 = queryNorm
                0.53595746 = fieldWeight in 8094, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.042444 = idf(docFreq=2109, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=8094)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
  4. Weinberg, B.H.: Book indexes in France : medieval specimens and modern practices (2000) 0.02
    0.015994422 = product of:
      0.047983266 = sum of:
        0.047983266 = product of:
          0.09596653 = sum of:
            0.09596653 = weight(_text_:22 in 486) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.09596653 = score(doc=486,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17717063 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050593734 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 486, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=486)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Source
    Indexer. 22(2000) no.1, S.2-13
  5. Weinberg, B.H.: Predecessors of scientific indexing structures in the domain of religion (2001) 0.02
    0.015994422 = product of:
      0.047983266 = sum of:
        0.047983266 = product of:
          0.09596653 = sum of:
            0.09596653 = weight(_text_:22 in 4172) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.09596653 = score(doc=4172,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17717063 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050593734 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 4172, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4172)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Source
    Indexer. 22(2001) no.4, S.178-180
  6. Weinberg, B.H.: Index structures in early Hebrew Biblical word lists : preludes to the first Latin concordances (2004) 0.02
    0.015994422 = product of:
      0.047983266 = sum of:
        0.047983266 = product of:
          0.09596653 = sum of:
            0.09596653 = weight(_text_:22 in 4180) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.09596653 = score(doc=4180,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17717063 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050593734 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 4180, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4180)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    17.10.2005 13:54:22
  7. Weinberg, B.H.: Why postcoordination fails the searcher (1995) 0.01
    0.012179474 = product of:
      0.036538422 = sum of:
        0.036538422 = product of:
          0.073076844 = sum of:
            0.073076844 = weight(_text_:database in 1942) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.073076844 = score(doc=1942,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.20452234 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.042444 = idf(docFreq=2109, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050593734 = queryNorm
                0.35730496 = fieldWeight in 1942, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.042444 = idf(docFreq=2109, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1942)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    Postcoordination, in which terms are combined at the searching stage rather than at the time of indexing, has been the main form of database access since the 1950s. Reasons for the failure of postcoordinate searches include the absence of specified relationships between terms, the complexity of formulating Boolean searches, and the high frequency of terms in large databases. Recent writers on indexing electronic text have called for precoordination to enhance the precision of retrieval. Among precoordinate indexing structures, a book index with coined modifications is the most precise. The time and cost associated with such customized analysis will, however, limit its application in the electronic environment
  8. Weinberg, B.H.: ¬The indexes to AACR2 and its 1988 revision : an evaluation (1990) 0.01
    0.00913967 = product of:
      0.02741901 = sum of:
        0.02741901 = product of:
          0.05483802 = sum of:
            0.05483802 = weight(_text_:22 in 3592) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.05483802 = score(doc=3592,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17717063 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050593734 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3592, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3592)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    14. 1.1996 5:56:22