Search (6 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Yan, E."
  1. Yan, E.; Ding, Y.: Weighted citation : an indicator of an article's prestige (2010) 0.02
    0.024672393 = product of:
      0.074017175 = sum of:
        0.074017175 = weight(_text_:reference in 3705) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.074017175 = score(doc=3705,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.205834 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.0683694 = idf(docFreq=2055, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050593734 = queryNorm
            0.35959643 = fieldWeight in 3705, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.0683694 = idf(docFreq=2055, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3705)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    The authors propose using the technique of weighted citation to measure an article's prestige. The technique allocates a different weight to each reference by taking into account the impact of citing journals and citation time intervals. Weightedcitation captures prestige, whereas citation counts capture popularity. They compare the value variances for popularity and prestige for articles published in the Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology from 1998 to 2007, and find that the majority have comparable status.
  2. Zhu, Y.; Yan, E.; Song, I.-Y..: ¬The use of a graph-based system to improve bibliographic information retrieval : system design, implementation, and evaluation (2017) 0.01
    0.012918284 = product of:
      0.03875485 = sum of:
        0.03875485 = product of:
          0.0775097 = sum of:
            0.0775097 = weight(_text_:database in 3356) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0775097 = score(doc=3356,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.20452234 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.042444 = idf(docFreq=2109, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050593734 = queryNorm
                0.37897915 = fieldWeight in 3356, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  4.042444 = idf(docFreq=2109, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3356)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    In this article, we propose a graph-based interactive bibliographic information retrieval system-GIBIR. GIBIR provides an effective way to retrieve bibliographic information. The system represents bibliographic information as networks and provides a form-based query interface. Users can develop their queries interactively by referencing the system-generated graph queries. Complex queries such as "papers on information retrieval, which were cited by John's papers that had been presented in SIGIR" can be effectively answered by the system. We evaluate the proposed system by developing another relational database-based bibliographic information retrieval system with the same interface and functions. Experiment results show that the proposed system executes the same queries much faster than the relational database-based system, and on average, our system reduced the execution time by 72% (for 3-node query), 89% (for 4-node query), and 99% (for 5-node query).
  3. Yan, E.; Yu, Q.: Using path-based approaches to examine the dynamic structure of discipline-level citation networks (2016) 0.01
    0.009134606 = product of:
      0.027403818 = sum of:
        0.027403818 = product of:
          0.054807637 = sum of:
            0.054807637 = weight(_text_:database in 3053) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.054807637 = score(doc=3053,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.20452234 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.042444 = idf(docFreq=2109, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050593734 = queryNorm
                0.26797873 = fieldWeight in 3053, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.042444 = idf(docFreq=2109, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3053)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    The objective of this paper is to identify the dynamic structure of several time-dependent, discipline-level citation networks through a path-based method. A network data set is prepared that comprises 27 subjects and their citations aggregated from more than 27,000 journals and proceedings indexed in the Scopus database. A maximum spanning tree method is employed to extract paths in the weighted, directed, and cyclic networks. This paper finds that subjects such as Medicine, Biochemistry, Chemistry, Materials Science, Physics, and Social Sciences are the ones with multiple branches in the spanning tree. This paper also finds that most paths connect science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) fields; 2 critical paths connecting STEM and non-STEM fields are the one from Mathematics to Decision Sciences and the one from Medicine to Social Sciences.
  4. Yan, E.: Finding knowledge paths among scientific disciplines (2014) 0.01
    0.008078404 = product of:
      0.02423521 = sum of:
        0.02423521 = product of:
          0.04847042 = sum of:
            0.04847042 = weight(_text_:22 in 1534) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04847042 = score(doc=1534,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.17717063 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050593734 = queryNorm
                0.27358043 = fieldWeight in 1534, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1534)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    26.10.2014 20:22:22
  5. Yan, E.; Zhu, Y.: Adding the dimension of knowledge trading to source impact assessment : approaches, indicators, and implications (2017) 0.01
    0.0076121716 = product of:
      0.022836514 = sum of:
        0.022836514 = product of:
          0.045673028 = sum of:
            0.045673028 = weight(_text_:database in 3633) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.045673028 = score(doc=3633,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.20452234 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.042444 = idf(docFreq=2109, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050593734 = queryNorm
                0.2233156 = fieldWeight in 3633, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.042444 = idf(docFreq=2109, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3633)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    The objective of this paper is to systematically assess sources' (e.g., journals and proceedings) impact in knowledge trading. While there have been efforts at evaluating different aspects of journal impact, the dimension of knowledge trading is largely absent. To fill the gap, this study employed a set of trading-based indicators, including weighted degree centrality, Shannon entropy, and weighted betweenness centrality, to assess sources' trading impact. These indicators were applied to several time-sliced source-to-source citation networks that comprise 33,634 sources indexed in the Scopus database. The results show that several interdisciplinary sources, such as Nature, PLoS One, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, and Science, and several specialty sources, such as Lancet, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Journal of the American Chemical Society, Journal of Biological Chemistry, and New England Journal of Medicine, have demonstrated their marked importance in knowledge trading. Furthermore, this study also reveals that, overall, sources have established more trading partners, increased their trading volumes, broadened their trading areas, and diversified their trading contents over the past 15 years from 1997 to 2011. These results inform the understanding of source-level impact assessment and knowledge diffusion.
  6. Zheng, X.; Chen, J.; Yan, E.; Ni, C.: Gender and country biases in Wikipedia citations to scholarly publications (2023) 0.01
    0.006854752 = product of:
      0.020564256 = sum of:
        0.020564256 = product of:
          0.041128512 = sum of:
            0.041128512 = weight(_text_:22 in 886) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.041128512 = score(doc=886,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17717063 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050593734 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 886, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=886)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    22. 1.2023 18:53:32

Authors