-
Gemberling, T.: FRSAD, Semiotics, and FRBR-LRM (2016)
0.02
0.02158834 = product of:
0.06476502 = sum of:
0.06476502 = weight(_text_:reference in 5118) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06476502 = score(doc=5118,freq=2.0), product of:
0.205834 = queryWeight, product of:
4.0683694 = idf(docFreq=2055, maxDocs=44218)
0.050593734 = queryNorm
0.31464687 = fieldWeight in 5118, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.0683694 = idf(docFreq=2055, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5118)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- Philosophy grapples with the deepest and most difficult questions in human life. In a 2012 article, Jonathan Furner raises questions about the "Functional Requirements for Subject Authority Data" (FRSAD) model. Can the FRSAD framers really avoid tackling philosophical questions as they attempt to do-the long-running dispute between nominalists and realists, in particular? This article attempts to flesh out a realist position while showing some implications for the new Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records-Library Reference Model. It is not clear that FRSAD really takes a realist view, as Furner claims, and a position on the nominalist-realist debate is not necessary for information professionals.
-
Priß, U.: ¬The formalization of WordNet by methods of relational concept analysis (1998)
0.02
0.018269213 = product of:
0.054807637 = sum of:
0.054807637 = product of:
0.109615274 = sum of:
0.109615274 = weight(_text_:database in 3079) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.109615274 = score(doc=3079,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20452234 = queryWeight, product of:
4.042444 = idf(docFreq=2109, maxDocs=44218)
0.050593734 = queryNorm
0.53595746 = fieldWeight in 3079, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.042444 = idf(docFreq=2109, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3079)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Source
- WordNet: an electronic lexical database (language, speech and communication). Ed.: C. Fellbaum
-
Dahlberg, I.: ¬Die gegenstandsbezogene, analytische Begriffstheorie und ihre Definitionsarten (1987)
0.02
0.015994422 = product of:
0.047983266 = sum of:
0.047983266 = product of:
0.09596653 = sum of:
0.09596653 = weight(_text_:22 in 880) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09596653 = score(doc=880,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17717063 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.050593734 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 880, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=880)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Pages
- S.9-22
-
Bonnevie, E.: Dretske's semantic information theory and meta-theories in library and information science (2001)
0.02
0.015420245 = product of:
0.046260733 = sum of:
0.046260733 = weight(_text_:reference in 4484) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.046260733 = score(doc=4484,freq=2.0), product of:
0.205834 = queryWeight, product of:
4.0683694 = idf(docFreq=2055, maxDocs=44218)
0.050593734 = queryNorm
0.22474778 = fieldWeight in 4484, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.0683694 = idf(docFreq=2055, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4484)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- This article presents the semantic information theory, formulated by the philosopher Fred I. Dretske, as a contribution to the discussion of metatheories and their practical implications in the field of library and information science. Dretske's theory is described in Knowledge and the flow of information. It is founded on mathematical communication theory but developed and elaborated into a cognitive, functionalistic theory, is individually oriented, and deals with the content of information. The topics are: the information process from perception to cognition, and how concept formation takes place in terms of digitisation. Other important issues are the concepts of information and knowledge, truth and meaning. Semantic information theory can be used as a frame of reference in order to explain, clarify and refute concepts currently used in library and information science, and as the basis for critical reviews of elements of the cognitive viewpoint in IR, primarily the notion of "potential information". The main contribution of the theory lies in a clarification of concepts, but there are still problems regarding the practical applications. More research is needed to combine philosophical discussions with the practice of information and library science.
-
Onofri, A.: Concepts in context (2013)
0.02
0.015265264 = product of:
0.04579579 = sum of:
0.04579579 = weight(_text_:reference in 1077) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04579579 = score(doc=1077,freq=4.0), product of:
0.205834 = queryWeight, product of:
4.0683694 = idf(docFreq=2055, maxDocs=44218)
0.050593734 = queryNorm
0.22248895 = fieldWeight in 1077, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
4.0683694 = idf(docFreq=2055, maxDocs=44218)
0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=1077)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- My thesis discusses two related problems that have taken center stage in the recent literature on concepts: 1) What are the individuation conditions of concepts? Under what conditions is a concept Cv(1) the same concept as a concept Cv(2)? 2) What are the possession conditions of concepts? What conditions must be satisfied for a thinker to have a concept C? The thesis defends a novel account of concepts, which I call "pluralist-contextualist": 1) Pluralism: Different concepts have different kinds of individuation and possession conditions: some concepts are individuated more "coarsely", have less demanding possession conditions and are widely shared, while other concepts are individuated more "finely" and not shared. 2) Contextualism: When a speaker ascribes a propositional attitude to a subject S, or uses his ascription to explain/predict S's behavior, the speaker's intentions in the relevant context determine the correct individuation conditions for the concepts involved in his report. In chapters 1-3 I defend a contextualist, non-Millian theory of propositional attitude ascriptions. Then, I show how contextualism can be used to offer a novel perspective on the problem of concept individuation/possession. More specifically, I employ contextualism to provide a new, more effective argument for Fodor's "publicity principle": if contextualism is true, then certain specific concepts must be shared in order for interpersonally applicable psychological generalizations to be possible. In chapters 4-5 I raise a tension between publicity and another widely endorsed principle, the "Fregean constraint" (FC): subjects who are unaware of certain identity facts and find themselves in so-called "Frege cases" must have distinct concepts for the relevant object x. For instance: the ancient astronomers had distinct concepts (HESPERUS/PHOSPHORUS) for the same object (the planet Venus). First, I examine some leading theories of concepts and argue that they cannot meet both of our constraints at the same time. Then, I offer principled reasons to think that no theory can satisfy (FC) while also respecting publicity. (FC) appears to require a form of holism, on which a concept is individuated by its global inferential role in a subject S and can thus only be shared by someone who has exactly the same inferential dispositions as S. This explains the tension between publicity and (FC), since holism is clearly incompatible with concept shareability. To solve the tension, I suggest adopting my pluralist-contextualist proposal: concepts involved in Frege cases are holistically individuated and not public, while other concepts are more coarsely individuated and widely shared; given this "plurality" of concepts, we will then need contextual factors (speakers' intentions) to "select" the specific concepts to be employed in our intentional generalizations in the relevant contexts. In chapter 6 I develop the view further by contrasting it with some rival accounts. First, I examine a very different kind of pluralism about concepts, which has been recently defended by Daniel Weiskopf, and argue that it is insufficiently radical. Then, I consider the inferentialist accounts defended by authors like Peacocke, Rey and Jackson. Such views, I argue, are committed to an implausible picture of reference determination, on which our inferential dispositions fix the reference of our concepts: this leads to wrong predictions in all those cases of scientific disagreement where two parties have very different inferential dispositions and yet seem to refer to the same natural kind.
-
Wüster, E.: Begriffs- und Themaklassifikation : Unterschiede in ihrem Wesen und in ihrer Anwendung (1971)
0.01
0.013709504 = product of:
0.041128512 = sum of:
0.041128512 = product of:
0.082257025 = sum of:
0.082257025 = weight(_text_:22 in 3904) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.082257025 = score(doc=3904,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17717063 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.050593734 = queryNorm
0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 3904, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3904)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Source
- Nachrichten für Dokumentation. 22(1971) H.3, S.98-104 (T.1); H.4, S.143-150 (T.2)
-
Dahlberg, I.: Begriffsarbeit in der Wissensorganisation (2010)
0.01
0.00913967 = product of:
0.02741901 = sum of:
0.02741901 = product of:
0.05483802 = sum of:
0.05483802 = weight(_text_:22 in 3726) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05483802 = score(doc=3726,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17717063 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.050593734 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3726, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3726)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Source
- Wissensspeicher in digitalen Räumen: Nachhaltigkeit - Verfügbarkeit - semantische Interoperabilität. Proceedings der 11. Tagung der Deutschen Sektion der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Wissensorganisation, Konstanz, 20. bis 22. Februar 2008. Hrsg.: J. Sieglerschmidt u. H.P.Ohly
-
O'Neill, E.T.; Kammerer, K.A.; Bennett, R.: ¬The aboutness of words (2017)
0.01
0.009134606 = product of:
0.027403818 = sum of:
0.027403818 = product of:
0.054807637 = sum of:
0.054807637 = weight(_text_:database in 3835) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.054807637 = score(doc=3835,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20452234 = queryWeight, product of:
4.042444 = idf(docFreq=2109, maxDocs=44218)
0.050593734 = queryNorm
0.26797873 = fieldWeight in 3835, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.042444 = idf(docFreq=2109, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3835)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- Word aboutness is defined as the relationship between words and subjects associated with them. An aboutness coefficient is developed to estimate the strength of the aboutness relationship. Words that are randomly distributed across subjects are assumed to lack aboutness and the degree to which their usage deviates from a random pattern indicates the strength of the aboutness. To estimate aboutness, title words and their associated subjects are extracted from the titles of non-fiction English language books in the OCLC WorldCat database. The usage patterns of the title words are analyzed and used to compute aboutness coefficients for each of the common title words. Words with low aboutness coefficients (An and In) are commonly found in stop word lists, whereas words with high aboutness coefficients (Carbonate, Autism) are unambiguous and have a strong subject association. The aboutness coefficient potentially can enhance indexing, advance authority control, and improve retrieval.
-
Storms, G.; VanMechelen, I.; DeBoeck, P.: Structural-analysis of the intension and extension of semantic concepts (1994)
0.01
0.007997211 = product of:
0.023991633 = sum of:
0.023991633 = product of:
0.047983266 = sum of:
0.047983266 = weight(_text_:22 in 2574) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.047983266 = score(doc=2574,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17717063 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.050593734 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2574, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2574)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Date
- 22. 7.2000 19:17:40
-
Bauer, G.: ¬Die vielseitigen Anwendungsmöglichkeiten des Kategorienprinzips bei der Wissensorganisation (2006)
0.01
0.007997211 = product of:
0.023991633 = sum of:
0.023991633 = product of:
0.047983266 = sum of:
0.047983266 = weight(_text_:22 in 5710) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.047983266 = score(doc=5710,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17717063 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.050593734 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 5710, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5710)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Pages
- S.22-33
-
Treude, L.: ¬Das Problem der Konzeptdefinition in der Wissensorganisation : über einen missglückten Versuch der Klärung (2013)
0.01
0.006854752 = product of:
0.020564256 = sum of:
0.020564256 = product of:
0.041128512 = sum of:
0.041128512 = weight(_text_:22 in 3060) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.041128512 = score(doc=3060,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17717063 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.050593734 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3060, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3060)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Source
- LIBREAS: Library ideas. no.22, 2013, S.xx-xx
-
Jouis, C.: Logic of relationships (2002)
0.01
0.005712294 = product of:
0.017136881 = sum of:
0.017136881 = product of:
0.034273762 = sum of:
0.034273762 = weight(_text_:22 in 1204) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.034273762 = score(doc=1204,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17717063 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.050593734 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1204, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1204)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Date
- 1.12.2002 11:12:22
-
Marradi, A.: ¬The concept of concept : concepts and terms (2012)
0.01
0.005712294 = product of:
0.017136881 = sum of:
0.017136881 = product of:
0.034273762 = sum of:
0.034273762 = weight(_text_:22 in 33) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.034273762 = score(doc=33,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17717063 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.050593734 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 33, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=33)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Date
- 22. 1.2012 13:11:25
-
Besler, G.; Szulc, J.: Gottlob Frege's theory of definition as useful tool for knowledge organization : definition of 'context' - case study (2014)
0.01
0.005712294 = product of:
0.017136881 = sum of:
0.017136881 = product of:
0.034273762 = sum of:
0.034273762 = weight(_text_:22 in 1440) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.034273762 = score(doc=1440,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17717063 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.050593734 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1440, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1440)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Source
- Knowledge organization in the 21st century: between historical patterns and future prospects. Proceedings of the Thirteenth International ISKO Conference 19-22 May 2014, Kraków, Poland. Ed.: Wieslaw Babik
-
Olson, H.A.: How we construct subjects : a feminist analysis (2007)
0.01
0.005712294 = product of:
0.017136881 = sum of:
0.017136881 = product of:
0.034273762 = sum of:
0.034273762 = weight(_text_:22 in 5588) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.034273762 = score(doc=5588,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17717063 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.050593734 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 5588, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5588)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Date
- 11.12.2019 19:00:22
