-
Blosser, J.; Michaelson, R.; Routh. R.; Xia, P.: Defining the landscape of Web resources : Concluding Report of the BAER Web Resources Sub-Group (2000)
0.08
0.07753032 = product of:
0.11629547 = sum of:
0.052338045 = weight(_text_:reference in 1447) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.052338045 = score(doc=1447,freq=4.0), product of:
0.205834 = queryWeight, product of:
4.0683694 = idf(docFreq=2055, maxDocs=44218)
0.050593734 = queryNorm
0.2542731 = fieldWeight in 1447, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
4.0683694 = idf(docFreq=2055, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1447)
0.06395743 = sum of:
0.036538422 = weight(_text_:database in 1447) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.036538422 = score(doc=1447,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20452234 = queryWeight, product of:
4.042444 = idf(docFreq=2109, maxDocs=44218)
0.050593734 = queryNorm
0.17865248 = fieldWeight in 1447, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.042444 = idf(docFreq=2109, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1447)
0.02741901 = weight(_text_:22 in 1447) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02741901 = score(doc=1447,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17717063 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.050593734 = queryNorm
0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 1447, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1447)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- The BAER Web Resources Group was charged in October 1999 with defining and describing the parameters of electronic resources that do not clearly belong to the categories being defined by the BAER Digital Group or the BAER Electronic Journals Group. After some difficulty identifying precisely which resources fell under the Group's charge, we finally named the following types of resources for our consideration: web sites, electronic texts, indexes, databases and abstracts, online reference resources, and networked and non-networked CD-ROMs. Electronic resources are a vast and growing collection that touch nearly every department within the Library. It is unrealistic to think one department can effectively administer all aspects of the collection. The Group then began to focus on the concern of bibliographic access to these varied resources, and to define parameters for handling or processing them within the Library. Some key elements became evident as the work progressed. * Selection process of resources to be acquired for the collection * Duplication of effort * Use of CORC * Resource Finder design * Maintenance of Resource Finder * CD-ROMs not networked * Communications * Voyager search limitations. An unexpected collaboration with the Web Development Committee on the Resource Finder helped to steer the Group to more detailed descriptions of bibliographic access. This collaboration included development of data elements for the Resource Finder database, and some discussions on Library staff processing of the resources. The Web Resources Group invited expert testimony to help the Group broaden its view to envision public use of the resources and discuss concerns related to technical services processing. The first testimony came from members of the Resource Finder Committee. Some background information on the Web Development Resource Finder Committee was shared. The second testimony was from librarians who select electronic texts. Three main themes were addressed: accessing CD-ROMs; the issue of including non-networked CD-ROMs in the Resource Finder; and, some special concerns about electronic texts. The third testimony came from librarians who select indexes and abstracts and also provide Reference services. Appendices to this report include minutes of the meetings with the experts (Appendix A), a list of proposed data elements to be used in the Resource Finder (Appendix B), and recommendations made to the Resource Finder Committee (Appendix C). Below are summaries of the key elements.
- Date
- 21. 4.2002 10:22:31
-
Baer, N.L.; Barrett, J.A.; Johnson, K.E.: OPAC database creation problems (1995)
0.07
0.073547006 = product of:
0.11032051 = sum of:
0.055512875 = weight(_text_:reference in 3343) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.055512875 = score(doc=3343,freq=2.0), product of:
0.205834 = queryWeight, product of:
4.0683694 = idf(docFreq=2055, maxDocs=44218)
0.050593734 = queryNorm
0.2696973 = fieldWeight in 3343, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.0683694 = idf(docFreq=2055, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3343)
0.054807637 = product of:
0.109615274 = sum of:
0.109615274 = weight(_text_:database in 3343) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.109615274 = score(doc=3343,freq=8.0), product of:
0.20452234 = queryWeight, product of:
4.042444 = idf(docFreq=2109, maxDocs=44218)
0.050593734 = queryNorm
0.53595746 = fieldWeight in 3343, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
4.042444 = idf(docFreq=2109, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3343)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- Reports results of a study to determine the nature and extent of the problems discovered when cataloguing records for a consortium of 5 libraries were merged to create an OPAC. Records in the shelf list of the host library (Rhode Island University) were compeared to records in both the OCLC database and the OPAC. Problems were found to be most acute in sheared records, most commonly among those for reference materials and periodicals where host library holdings were often missing. Even for records present, call numbers were often missing, multi volume records were often incomplete, and records for theses and dissertations were confusing and misleading. A dirty database requiring some cleaning up of past cataloguing errors had been expected but the magnitude of the problem and the apparent overlaying of the first loaded records by subsequently loaded records was totally unexpected by cataloguing staff, thereby calling into question the process by which the shared database had been created
-
Nuttall, H.D.; McAbee, S.L.: Pathfinders on-line : adding pathfinders to a NOTIS on-line system (1997)
0.07
0.06762412 = product of:
0.10143618 = sum of:
0.074017175 = weight(_text_:reference in 510) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.074017175 = score(doc=510,freq=2.0), product of:
0.205834 = queryWeight, product of:
4.0683694 = idf(docFreq=2055, maxDocs=44218)
0.050593734 = queryNorm
0.35959643 = fieldWeight in 510, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.0683694 = idf(docFreq=2055, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=510)
0.02741901 = product of:
0.05483802 = sum of:
0.05483802 = weight(_text_:22 in 510) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05483802 = score(doc=510,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17717063 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.050593734 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 510, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=510)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- For decades print pathfinders have complemented card catalogues and been useful reference tools. They are overlooked as components of online catalogues, even though they can extend the depth of the catalogue. To encourage librarians to consider integrating pathfinders into online catalogues discusses problems in OPAC searching, describes the value and styles of pathfinders, and illustrates how to include them in a NOTIS system
- Date
- 27.11.1995 17:07:22
-
Martin, L.M.: Evaluating OPACs or, OPACs are reference tools, too! (1992)
0.07
0.06527702 = product of:
0.19583105 = sum of:
0.19583105 = weight(_text_:reference in 4550) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.19583105 = score(doc=4550,freq=14.0), product of:
0.205834 = queryWeight, product of:
4.0683694 = idf(docFreq=2055, maxDocs=44218)
0.050593734 = queryNorm
0.9514028 = fieldWeight in 4550, product of:
3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
14.0 = termFreq=14.0
4.0683694 = idf(docFreq=2055, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4550)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- Althogh the library literature contains numerous papers on the functional and performance evaluation of OPACs, as well as on the evaluation of many facets of reference service, it presents little assistance for the evaluation of OPACs as the central facet of reference service. In order to alleviate this lack, evaluates OPACs as if they were any other reference tool, judging them against Norman D. Stevens' classic 18 criteria for the evaluation of reference books. Includes a selective bibliography of works on both OPAC and reference book evaluation
- Source
- Reference librarian. 1992, no.38, S.201-220
-
Piccotti, P.: ¬Les nouvelles technologies et la recherche documentaire (1998)
0.06
0.059171103 = product of:
0.08875665 = sum of:
0.06476502 = weight(_text_:reference in 2226) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06476502 = score(doc=2226,freq=2.0), product of:
0.205834 = queryWeight, product of:
4.0683694 = idf(docFreq=2055, maxDocs=44218)
0.050593734 = queryNorm
0.31464687 = fieldWeight in 2226, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.0683694 = idf(docFreq=2055, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2226)
0.023991633 = product of:
0.047983266 = sum of:
0.047983266 = weight(_text_:22 in 2226) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.047983266 = score(doc=2226,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17717063 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.050593734 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2226, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2226)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- The Venice University Institute of Architecture has developed Easyweb, a software package to integrate its heterogeneous non-compatible bibliographic and multimedia databases, standardise access and create internal links, by transferring all existing OPAC applications to the Web. Features include importation of UNIMARC data, multiple window searching, multibase searching and special applications, e.g. circulation management. Easyweb is notable user friendly and has become the point of reference for OPACs in Italy
- Source
- Bulletin d'informations de l'Association des Bibliothecaires Francais. 1998, no.178, S.20-22
-
Future of online catalogues : Essen symposium, 30.9.-3.10.1985 (1986)
0.06
0.057209827 = product of:
0.08581474 = sum of:
0.046260733 = weight(_text_:reference in 2077) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.046260733 = score(doc=2077,freq=2.0), product of:
0.205834 = queryWeight, product of:
4.0683694 = idf(docFreq=2055, maxDocs=44218)
0.050593734 = queryNorm
0.22474778 = fieldWeight in 2077, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.0683694 = idf(docFreq=2055, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2077)
0.039554004 = product of:
0.07910801 = sum of:
0.07910801 = weight(_text_:database in 2077) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07910801 = score(doc=2077,freq=6.0), product of:
0.20452234 = queryWeight, product of:
4.042444 = idf(docFreq=2109, maxDocs=44218)
0.050593734 = queryNorm
0.38679397 = fieldWeight in 2077, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
4.042444 = idf(docFreq=2109, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2077)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Content
- Enthält u.a die Beiträge: HILDRETH, Ch.: Online public access catalogues; VOGT, H.: The future of online catalogues in the northern areas of Germany; SEAL, A.: Data structures, MARC and online access; HOLM, L.: Design of databases as good catalogues; RISHOEJ, J.: From database-production to an online catalogue; BUCKLE, D.: OCLC Europe: bibliographic database services for catalogue conversion; FERGUSON, J.: Future of online catalogues. UTLAS in Europe - a personal view; SÜLE, G.: Problems of duplicate records, standards and quality control; HUNSTAD, S.: Problems of duplicate records; SCHOOTS, P.: Browsers in Rotterdam: popular access to the database; KINSELLA, J.: "Prospects for browsing": experimental approaches to the presentation of brief entries and the design of 'browse screens'; MERRIN, G.: Access points and search methods in the SIBIL system with special reference to Boolean and tree search; KOHL, E.: The online union catalogue of parliamentary and government institutions in the Federal Republic of Germany; COSTERS, L. u. J. BUYS: The results of an experiment with an online public access catalogue; NOERR, K.B. u. P. NOERR: A microcomputer system for online catalogues; RAITT, D.: Online catalogues: the facts, the features, the future
-
Thorne, R.; Whitlatch, J.B.: Patron online catalog success (1994)
0.05
0.05288042 = product of:
0.15864126 = sum of:
0.15864126 = weight(_text_:reference in 855) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.15864126 = score(doc=855,freq=12.0), product of:
0.205834 = queryWeight, product of:
4.0683694 = idf(docFreq=2055, maxDocs=44218)
0.050593734 = queryNorm
0.7707243 = fieldWeight in 855, product of:
3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
12.0 = termFreq=12.0
4.0683694 = idf(docFreq=2055, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=855)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- The project explored the ways in which the online catalogue contributes, or does not contribute to the success of library users. Key issues examined included: whether students are really getting appropriate assistance when using the online catalogue; the most common searching successes and failures observed for people using the online catalogue without staff assistance; and the effectiveness of online catalogue use by librarians providing reference assistance compared to other sources (reference books, electronic and printed indexes). Reviews relevant studies of online catalogues and reference success and describes the methodology and results of 3 different online catalogue studies: the Reference Assessment Survey; the online catalogue study of unassisted users; and the document availability study; all conducted at San José State University Library; California, using the Reference Transaction Assessment Instrument. Considers the implications of the results for reference practice and study methodology
-
Greenberg, J.: Reference structures : stagnation, progress, and future challenges (1997)
0.05
0.05288042 = product of:
0.15864126 = sum of:
0.15864126 = weight(_text_:reference in 1103) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.15864126 = score(doc=1103,freq=12.0), product of:
0.205834 = queryWeight, product of:
4.0683694 = idf(docFreq=2055, maxDocs=44218)
0.050593734 = queryNorm
0.7707243 = fieldWeight in 1103, product of:
3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
12.0 = termFreq=12.0
4.0683694 = idf(docFreq=2055, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1103)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- Assesses the current state of reference structures in OPACs in a framework defined by stagnation, progress, and future challenges. 'Stagnation' referes to the limited and inconsistent reference structure access provided in current OPACs. 'Progress' refers to improved OPAC reference structure access and reference structure possibilities that extend beyond those commonly represented in existing subject autgority control tools. The progress discussion is supported by a look at professional committee work, data modelling ideas, ontological theory, and one area of linguistic research. The discussion ends with a list of 6 areas needing attention if reference structure access is to be improved in the future OPAC environment
-
Roose, T.: Online catalogs : making them better reference tools (1988)
0.05
0.049344786 = product of:
0.14803435 = sum of:
0.14803435 = weight(_text_:reference in 2904) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.14803435 = score(doc=2904,freq=2.0), product of:
0.205834 = queryWeight, product of:
4.0683694 = idf(docFreq=2055, maxDocs=44218)
0.050593734 = queryNorm
0.71919286 = fieldWeight in 2904, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.0683694 = idf(docFreq=2055, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=2904)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
-
Hildreth, C.R.: Pursuing the ideal : generations of online catalogs (1984)
0.05
0.049344786 = product of:
0.14803435 = sum of:
0.14803435 = weight(_text_:reference in 5408) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.14803435 = score(doc=5408,freq=2.0), product of:
0.205834 = queryWeight, product of:
4.0683694 = idf(docFreq=2055, maxDocs=44218)
0.050593734 = queryNorm
0.71919286 = fieldWeight in 5408, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.0683694 = idf(docFreq=2055, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=5408)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Source
- Online catalogs, online reference: converging trends. Ed: Brian Aveney and Brett Butler
-
Zink, D.: Monitoring user search success through transaction log analysis : the WolfPAC example (1991)
0.05
0.049344786 = product of:
0.14803435 = sum of:
0.14803435 = weight(_text_:reference in 6040) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.14803435 = score(doc=6040,freq=2.0), product of:
0.205834 = queryWeight, product of:
4.0683694 = idf(docFreq=2055, maxDocs=44218)
0.050593734 = queryNorm
0.71919286 = fieldWeight in 6040, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.0683694 = idf(docFreq=2055, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=6040)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Source
- Reference services review. 19(1991), S.49-56
-
Casale, M.: Searching for a common language (1996)
0.05
0.046137087 = product of:
0.13841125 = sum of:
0.13841125 = sum of:
0.09042799 = weight(_text_:database in 4439) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09042799 = score(doc=4439,freq=4.0), product of:
0.20452234 = queryWeight, product of:
4.042444 = idf(docFreq=2109, maxDocs=44218)
0.050593734 = queryNorm
0.44214234 = fieldWeight in 4439, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
4.042444 = idf(docFreq=2109, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4439)
0.047983266 = weight(_text_:22 in 4439) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.047983266 = score(doc=4439,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17717063 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.050593734 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 4439, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4439)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- Describes the availability, use and value of Z39.50, an international standard which allows a librarian accessing a database on one computer platform to search an OPAC hosted on another computer with a totally different database structure. Experiences of those working with the standard are given, and its use by the European Union IRIS project to link 6 major Irish research libraries is examined. Despite some problems encountered with different forms of author cataloguing and possible competition from the WWW, the standard is seen as possessing considerable strengths, for example in searching different catalogues and presenting the results in a standard format on screen, which justify the continuing interest of librarians
- Source
- Library manager. 1996, no.14, S.22-23
-
McGarry, D.: Displays of bibliographic records in call number order : functions of the displays and data elements needed (1992)
0.05
0.046064835 = product of:
0.06909725 = sum of:
0.046260733 = weight(_text_:reference in 2384) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.046260733 = score(doc=2384,freq=2.0), product of:
0.205834 = queryWeight, product of:
4.0683694 = idf(docFreq=2055, maxDocs=44218)
0.050593734 = queryNorm
0.22474778 = fieldWeight in 2384, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.0683694 = idf(docFreq=2055, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2384)
0.022836514 = product of:
0.045673028 = sum of:
0.045673028 = weight(_text_:database in 2384) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.045673028 = score(doc=2384,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20452234 = queryWeight, product of:
4.042444 = idf(docFreq=2109, maxDocs=44218)
0.050593734 = queryNorm
0.2233156 = fieldWeight in 2384, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.042444 = idf(docFreq=2109, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2384)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- Online displays of bibliographic records in call number order can serve various functions. A literature search showed no papers or books discussing this topic directly. Various displays from online catalogues available via the Internet were examined, as were displays sent to the author by colleagues. A number of the displays were uninformative to the extent that the identification of works associated with call numbers was difficult or impossible without follow-up searching of the individual bibliographic records. Other displays provided information where further searching of the database would not be required for most purposes. Displays noted ranged from displays with call numbers alone, with no bibliographic information, to records including main entry, title, statement of responsibility, place, publisher, and date. Suggestions of useful data elements to be included in displays of bibliographic records in call number order are made for the following functions: shelflisting, cataloguing, catalogue maintenance, reference, public searches, acquisition and collection development, and inventory control. Recommendations are made that the following data elements should be present in call number displays: entire call number as a sequencing element; main entry; entire title proper, and the date. Concern is expressed that the call number filing arrangement be that followed in traditional shelflists, and a suggestion is made that possible consensus on the placement of the data elements within a display be considered in the future
-
Walker, S.; Jones, R.M.: Improving subject retrieval in online catalogues : T.1: Stemming, automatic spelling correction and cross-reference tables (1987)
0.04
0.04317668 = product of:
0.12953004 = sum of:
0.12953004 = weight(_text_:reference in 2141) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.12953004 = score(doc=2141,freq=2.0), product of:
0.205834 = queryWeight, product of:
4.0683694 = idf(docFreq=2055, maxDocs=44218)
0.050593734 = queryNorm
0.62929374 = fieldWeight in 2141, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.0683694 = idf(docFreq=2055, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=2141)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
-
Burke, J.: ¬The future OPAC : content, form and boundaries (1991)
0.04
0.04317668 = product of:
0.12953004 = sum of:
0.12953004 = weight(_text_:reference in 7692) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.12953004 = score(doc=7692,freq=2.0), product of:
0.205834 = queryWeight, product of:
4.0683694 = idf(docFreq=2055, maxDocs=44218)
0.050593734 = queryNorm
0.62929374 = fieldWeight in 7692, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.0683694 = idf(docFreq=2055, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=7692)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Imprint
- Chicago : ALA / Reference and Adult Services Division
-
Farley, L.: Together at last : regeneration and merging of the MELVYL catalog and periodicals databases (1997)
0.04
0.042638287 = product of:
0.12791486 = sum of:
0.12791486 = sum of:
0.073076844 = weight(_text_:database in 1834) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.073076844 = score(doc=1834,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20452234 = queryWeight, product of:
4.042444 = idf(docFreq=2109, maxDocs=44218)
0.050593734 = queryNorm
0.35730496 = fieldWeight in 1834, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.042444 = idf(docFreq=2109, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1834)
0.05483802 = weight(_text_:22 in 1834) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05483802 = score(doc=1834,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17717063 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.050593734 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1834, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1834)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- A Serials Task Force at the University of California, USA, is currently working on merging the MELVYL catalogue and periodicals database. Details its design principles and discusses the major design issues of: name authority control, subject authority files, subsets, long searches, consolidation, sorting, and creation of possible new indexes for keywords, notes, titles, conferences, call numbers, combine author/titles, music, geospatial searching, and form limits
- Source
- DLA bulletin. 17(1997) no.1, S.18-22
-
Lazinger, S.S.; Peritz, B.C.: Reader use of a nationwide research library network : local OPAC vs. remote files (1991)
0.04
0.039546072 = product of:
0.11863822 = sum of:
0.11863822 = sum of:
0.0775097 = weight(_text_:database in 3013) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0775097 = score(doc=3013,freq=4.0), product of:
0.20452234 = queryWeight, product of:
4.042444 = idf(docFreq=2109, maxDocs=44218)
0.050593734 = queryNorm
0.37897915 = fieldWeight in 3013, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
4.042444 = idf(docFreq=2109, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3013)
0.041128512 = weight(_text_:22 in 3013) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.041128512 = score(doc=3013,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17717063 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.050593734 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3013, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3013)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- The primary objective of the present study was to exmine whether readers conducting bibliographic searches in ALEPH - Israel's research library network - tend to search only within the OPAC of the library within which they are working or whether they access the remote OPACs of other libraries. The ALEPH network has a dezentralized database. Therefore, it was possible to examine this question because each library has its own access code and each database can be searched separately. The data were collected by means of a one-page questionnaire lefr beside each terminal in the library of the Graduate School of Library and Archive Studies of the Hebrew University of Jerusalem during an entire academic years. results of analysis of the data collected in this survey are presented in 6 tables
- Date
- 22. 2.1999 13:06:18
-
Merrin, G.: Access points and search methods in the Sibil system with special reference to Boolean and tree search (1986)
0.04
0.037008584 = product of:
0.11102575 = sum of:
0.11102575 = weight(_text_:reference in 1344) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.11102575 = score(doc=1344,freq=2.0), product of:
0.205834 = queryWeight, product of:
4.0683694 = idf(docFreq=2055, maxDocs=44218)
0.050593734 = queryNorm
0.5393946 = fieldWeight in 1344, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.0683694 = idf(docFreq=2055, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1344)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
-
Hildreth, C.R.: Advancing toward the E-3 OPAC : the imperative and the path (1991)
0.04
0.037008584 = product of:
0.11102575 = sum of:
0.11102575 = weight(_text_:reference in 7678) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.11102575 = score(doc=7678,freq=2.0), product of:
0.205834 = queryWeight, product of:
4.0683694 = idf(docFreq=2055, maxDocs=44218)
0.050593734 = queryNorm
0.5393946 = fieldWeight in 7678, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.0683694 = idf(docFreq=2055, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=7678)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Imprint
- Chicago : ALA / Reference and Adult Services Division
-
Matthews, J.R.: ¬The online catalog : time to move beyond the boundary of a 'catalog'! (1991)
0.04
0.037008584 = product of:
0.11102575 = sum of:
0.11102575 = weight(_text_:reference in 7679) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.11102575 = score(doc=7679,freq=2.0), product of:
0.205834 = queryWeight, product of:
4.0683694 = idf(docFreq=2055, maxDocs=44218)
0.050593734 = queryNorm
0.5393946 = fieldWeight in 7679, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.0683694 = idf(docFreq=2055, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=7679)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Imprint
- Chicago : ALA / Reference and Adult Services Division
