-
Dupuis, P.; Lapointe, J.: Developpement d'un outil documentaire à Hydro-Quebec : le Thesaurus HQ (1997)
0.04
0.042638287 = product of:
0.12791486 = sum of:
0.12791486 = sum of:
0.073076844 = weight(_text_:database in 3173) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.073076844 = score(doc=3173,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20452234 = queryWeight, product of:
4.042444 = idf(docFreq=2109, maxDocs=44218)
0.050593734 = queryNorm
0.35730496 = fieldWeight in 3173, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.042444 = idf(docFreq=2109, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3173)
0.05483802 = weight(_text_:22 in 3173) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05483802 = score(doc=3173,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17717063 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.050593734 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3173, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3173)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- Describes the backgroud to the construction of a thesaurus at Hydro-Quebec, Quebec, Canada. Several information units, linked to form a network, share the same bibliographic database. The need for coherence and efficiency was the principle motive for the construction of the multidisciplinary thesaurus. Describes the construction process, discusses the specifity of the tool, its circulation, and considers its use on a partnership basis with other information services
- Source
- Argus. 26(1997) no.3, S.16-22
-
Johnson, E.H.: Objects for distributed heterogeneous information retrieval (2000)
0.04
0.037793927 = product of:
0.11338177 = sum of:
0.11338177 = sum of:
0.07910801 = weight(_text_:database in 6959) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07910801 = score(doc=6959,freq=6.0), product of:
0.20452234 = queryWeight, product of:
4.042444 = idf(docFreq=2109, maxDocs=44218)
0.050593734 = queryNorm
0.38679397 = fieldWeight in 6959, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
4.042444 = idf(docFreq=2109, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=6959)
0.034273762 = weight(_text_:22 in 6959) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.034273762 = score(doc=6959,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17717063 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.050593734 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 6959, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=6959)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- The success of the World Wide Web Shows that we can access, search, and retrieve information from globally distributed databases. lf a database, such as a library catalog, has some sort of Web-based front end, we can type its URL into a Web browser and use its HTML-based forms to search for items in that database. Depending an how well the query conforms to the database content, how the search engine interprets the query, and how the server formats the results into HTML, we might actually find something usable. While the first two issues depend an ourselves and the server, an the Web the latter falls to the mercy of HTML, which we all know as a great destroyer of information because it codes for display but not for content description. When looking at an HTML-formatted display, we must depend an our own interpretation to recognize such entities as author names, titles, and subject identifiers. The Web browser can do nothing but display the information. lf we want some other view of the result, such as sorting the records by date (provided it offers such an option to begin with), the server must do it. This makes poor use of the computing power we have at the desktop (or even laptop), which, unless it involves retrieving more records, could easily do the result Set manipulation that we currently send back to the server. Despite having personal computers wich immense computational power, as far as information retrieval goes, we still essentially use them as dumb terminals.
- Date
- 22. 9.1997 19:16:05
-
Callan, J.: Distributed information retrieval (2000)
0.02
0.02131408 = product of:
0.06394224 = sum of:
0.06394224 = product of:
0.12788448 = sum of:
0.12788448 = weight(_text_:database in 31) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.12788448 = score(doc=31,freq=8.0), product of:
0.20452234 = queryWeight, product of:
4.042444 = idf(docFreq=2109, maxDocs=44218)
0.050593734 = queryNorm
0.62528366 = fieldWeight in 31, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
4.042444 = idf(docFreq=2109, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=31)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- A multi-database model of distributed information retrieval is presented, in which people are assumed to have access to many searchable text databases. In such an environment, full-text information retrieval consists of discovering database contents, ranking databases by their expected ability to satisfy the query, searching a small number of databases, and merging results returned by different databases. This paper presents algorithms for each task. It also discusses how to reorganize conventional test collections into multi-database testbeds, and evaluation methodologies for multi-database experiments. A broad and diverse group of experimental results is presented to demonstrate that the algorithms are effective, efficient, robust, and scalable
-
Smith, N.; Ashton, J.: ¬The British Library and Z39.50 (1994)
0.02
0.017224379 = product of:
0.051673137 = sum of:
0.051673137 = product of:
0.10334627 = sum of:
0.10334627 = weight(_text_:database in 1504) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.10334627 = score(doc=1504,freq=4.0), product of:
0.20452234 = queryWeight, product of:
4.042444 = idf(docFreq=2109, maxDocs=44218)
0.050593734 = queryNorm
0.5053055 = fieldWeight in 1504, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
4.042444 = idf(docFreq=2109, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1504)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- The British Library is currently progressing several projects involving Z39.50 and SR standards. The Network OPAC trial service is being extended for a further year and the user base broadened. Future applications of Z39.50 currently being investigated include access from Z39.50 clients developed by other suppliers; a virtual database to cover all the library's diverse catalogues; and a national distributed bibliographic database
-
Cousins, S.; Sanders, A.: Incorporating a virtual union catalogue into the wider information environment through the application of middleware: Interoperability issues in cross-database access (2006)
0.02
0.017021334 = product of:
0.051064 = sum of:
0.051064 = product of:
0.102128 = sum of:
0.102128 = weight(_text_:database in 5591) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.102128 = score(doc=5591,freq=10.0), product of:
0.20452234 = queryWeight, product of:
4.042444 = idf(docFreq=2109, maxDocs=44218)
0.050593734 = queryNorm
0.49934888 = fieldWeight in 5591, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
4.042444 = idf(docFreq=2109, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5591)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- Purpose - To explore the use of middleware to provide access to a virtual catalogue via Z39.50, allowing its integration with other services. To consider issues arising from the cross-database search process and the problem of interoperability between systems. Design/methodology/approach - Middleware was used to establish a Z39.50 server for an existing virtual union catalogue, InforM25. The Copac physical union catalogue was used to carry out cross-database search tests, investigating the value of query transformation by the middleware and illustrating many of the issues associated with interoperability in cross-database searching. Findings - The test results demonstrate the viability and benefits of using middleware to allow the integration of virtual catalogues with other services. The results also illustrate the range of issues affecting the performance of the virtual catalogue, with supporting evidence from the use of the Copac physical union catalogue for cross-database searching via Z39.50. In particular the discussion highlights the issue of semantic interoperability, as well as emphasising the value of centralised virtual catalogue support. Research limitations/implications - The research was limited to work on a specific virtual union catalogue, that is InforM25, but the results highlight issues with general relevance in the development of any virtual catalogue. The need for more work on response times in the virtual union catalogue is apparent, along with the related issue of result set post processing. Originality/value - This paper provides a practical demonstration of the issues important to those involved in making their local catalogue accessible to services, and individuals, outside their own institution, as well as those working on virtual union catalogue development.
-
Milanesi, C.: Möglichkeiten der Kooperation im Rahmen von Subject Gateways : das Euler-Projekt im Vergleich mit weiteren europäischen Projekten (2001)
0.01
0.013709504 = product of:
0.041128512 = sum of:
0.041128512 = product of:
0.082257025 = sum of:
0.082257025 = weight(_text_:22 in 4865) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.082257025 = score(doc=4865,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17717063 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.050593734 = queryNorm
0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 4865, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4865)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Date
- 22. 6.2002 19:41:59
-
Subject retrieval in a networked environment : Proceedings of the IFLA Satellite Meeting held in Dublin, OH, 14-16 August 2001 and sponsored by the IFLA Classification and Indexing Section, the IFLA Information Technology Section and OCLC (2003)
0.01
0.0131820245 = product of:
0.039546072 = sum of:
0.039546072 = sum of:
0.025836568 = weight(_text_:database in 3964) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.025836568 = score(doc=3964,freq=4.0), product of:
0.20452234 = queryWeight, product of:
4.042444 = idf(docFreq=2109, maxDocs=44218)
0.050593734 = queryNorm
0.12632638 = fieldWeight in 3964, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
4.042444 = idf(docFreq=2109, maxDocs=44218)
0.015625 = fieldNorm(doc=3964)
0.013709505 = weight(_text_:22 in 3964) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.013709505 = score(doc=3964,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17717063 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.050593734 = queryNorm
0.07738023 = fieldWeight in 3964, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.015625 = fieldNorm(doc=3964)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Content
- Enthält die Beiträge: Devadason, F.J., N. Intaraksa u. P. Patamawongjariya u.a.: Faceted indexing application for organizing and accessing internet resources; Nicholson, D., S. Wake: HILT: subject retrieval in a distributed environment; Olson, T.: Integrating LCSH and MeSH in information systems; Kuhr, P.S.: Putting the world back together: mapping multiple vocabularies into a single thesaurus; Freyre, E., M. Naudi: MACS : subject access across languages and networks; McIlwaine, I.C.: The UDC and the World Wide Web; Garrison, W.A.: The Colorado Digitization Project: subject access issues; Vizine-Goetz, D., R. Thompson: Towards DDC-classified displays of Netfirst search results: subject access issues; Godby, C.J., J. Stuler: The Library of Congress Classification as a knowledge base for automatic subject categorization: subject access issues; O'Neill, E.T., E. Childress u. R. Dean u.a.: FAST: faceted application of subject terminology; Bean, C.A., R. Green: Improving subject retrieval with frame representation; Zeng, M.L., Y. Chen: Features of an integrated thesaurus management and search system for the networked environment; Hudon, M.: Subject access to Web resources in education; Qin, J., J. Chen: A multi-layered, multi-dimensional representation of digital educational resources; Riesthuis, G.J.A.: Information languages and multilingual subject access; Geisselmann, F.: Access methods in a database of e-journals; Beghtol, C.: The Iter Bibliography: International standard subject access to medieval and renaissance materials (400-1700); Slavic, A.: General library classification in learning material metadata: the application in IMS/LOM and CDMES metadata schemas; Cordeiro, M.I.: From library authority control to network authoritative metadata sources; Koch, T., H. Neuroth u. M. Day: Renardus: Cross-browsing European subject gateways via a common classification system (DDC); Olson, H.A., D.B. Ward: Mundane standards, everyday technologies, equitable access; Burke, M.A.: Personal Construct Theory as a research tool in Library and Information Science: case study: development of a user-driven classification of photographs
- Footnote
- Rez. in: KO 31(2004) no.2, S.117-118 (D. Campbell): "This excellent volume offers 22 papers delivered at an IFLA Satellite meeting in Dublin Ohio in 2001. The conference gathered together information and computer scientists to discuss an important and difficult question: in what specific ways can the accumulated skills, theories and traditions of librarianship be mobilized to face the challenges of providing subject access to information in present and future networked information environments? The papers which grapple with this question are organized in a surprisingly deft and coherent way. Many conferences and proceedings have unhappy sessions that contain a hodge-podge of papers that didn't quite fit any other categories. As befits a good classificationist, editor I.C. McIlwaine has kept this problem to a minimum. The papers are organized into eight sessions, which split into two broad categories. The first five sessions deal with subject domains, and the last three deal with subject access tools. The five sessions and thirteen papers that discuss access in different domains appear in order of in creasing intension. The first papers deal with access in multilingual environments, followed by papers an access across multiple vocabularies and across sectors, ending up with studies of domain-specific retrieval (primarily education). Some of the papers offer predictably strong work by scholars engaged in ongoing, long-term research. Gerard Riesthuis offers a clear analysis of the complexities of negotiating non-identical thesauri, particularly in cases where hierarchical structure varies across different languages. Hope Olson and Dennis Ward use Olson's familiar and welcome method of using provocative and unconventional theory to generate meliorative approaches to blas in general subject access schemes. Many papers, an the other hand, deal with specific ongoing projects: Renardus, The High Level Thesaurus Project, The Colorado Digitization Project and The Iter Bibliography for medieval and Renaissance material. Most of these papers display a similar structure: an explanation of the theory and purpose of the project, an account of problems encountered in the implementation, and a discussion of the results, both promising and disappointing, thus far. Of these papers, the account of the Multilanguage Access to Subjects Project in Europe (MACS) deserves special mention. In describing how the project is founded an the principle of the equality of languages, with each subject heading language maintained in its own database, and with no single language used as a pivot for the others, Elisabeth Freyre and Max Naudi offer a particularly vivid example of the way the ethics of librarianship translate into pragmatic contexts and concrete procedures. The three sessions and nine papers devoted to subject access tools split into two kinds: papers that discuss the use of theory and research to generate new tools for a networked environment, and those that discuss the transformation of traditional subject access tools in this environment. In the new tool development area, Mary Burke provides a promising example of the bidirectional approach that is so often necessary: in her case study of user-driven classification of photographs, she user personal construct theory to clarify the practice of classification, while at the same time using practice to test the theory. Carol Bean and Rebecca Green offer an intriguing combination of librarianship and computer science, importing frame representation technique from artificial intelligence to standardize syntagmatic relationships to enhance recall and precision.
-
Hodoroaba, L.; Imhof, A.; Kuberek, M.: ¬Das KOBV-Portal, elektronische Ressourcen in Berlin-Brandenburg : Nachweis, parallele Suche und weiterführende Dienste (2004)
0.01
0.012336196 = product of:
0.037008587 = sum of:
0.037008587 = weight(_text_:reference in 2813) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.037008587 = score(doc=2813,freq=2.0), product of:
0.205834 = queryWeight, product of:
4.0683694 = idf(docFreq=2055, maxDocs=44218)
0.050593734 = queryNorm
0.17979822 = fieldWeight in 2813, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.0683694 = idf(docFreq=2055, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2813)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- Das Projekt "KOBV-Informationsportal" In den vergangenen Jahren hat der Kooperative Bibliotheksverbund BerlinBrandenburg (KOBV) mit der KOBV-Suchmaschine eine Internet-Plattform mit einer offenen Architektur geschaffen. Auf dieser technischen Basis erweitert er kontinuierlich sein Dienstleistungsangebot, wobei die Prinzipien des KOBV - insbesondere Offenheit, Heterogenität und Dezentralität auf technischer und organisatorischer Ebene - gewahrt bleiben. Mitte 2001 hat die KOBV-Zentrale gemeinsam mit den regionalen Bibliotheken das zweite große Entwicklungsprojekt "KOBV-Informationsportal" gestartet. Zielsetzung war der Aufbau eines kooperativen regionalen Portals mit Einsatz von Linking-Mechanismen zur "nahtlosen" Navigation in freien und lizenzierten Dokumenten und mit Einsatz von Instrumenten zur dezentralen Authentifizierung und Autorisierung über das Internet. Im Dezember 2003 hat das "KOBV-Portal - Digitale Bibliothek Berlin-Brandenburg" planmäßig in einer ersten Ausbaustufe den Routinebetrieb aufgenommen. Das KOBV-Portal bietet in dieser Stufe den Nachweis über die in den großen Bibliotheken lizenzierten Ressourcen und elektronischen Zeitschriften, zudem die nahtlose Navigation mittels des Reference-LinkingWerkzeuges SFX zu verschiedenen Diensten wie Fernleihe, Subito und freien Volltexten im Internet sowie zu frei zugänglichen elektronischen Zeitschriften. Die mit der verteilten Authentifizierung und Autorisierung verbundene Zielsetzung konnte im Rahmen des Projektes erst zum Teil umgesetzt werden. Realisiert wurde die Remote-Authentifizierung, mit der sich ein Nutzer, der online eine Fernleih-Bestellung aufgeben möchte, über das Internet in seiner Heimatbibliothek authentifizieren kann. Des weiteren ist der Zugriff auf lizenzierte Bestände im Campus einer Hochschule mittels IP-Checking möglich. Als weiteren wesentlichen Bestandteil des KOBV-Portals hat die KOBVZentrale mit den Bibliotheken einen Workflow für ein Metadata-Sharing abgestimmt und für die Adaption und Normalisierung lokaler Metadaten aus lokalen Bibliothekssystemen und -Portalen den KOBV-Metadaten-AustauschParser (KMA-Parser) entwickelt. Darüber hinaus sollen Bibliotheken, deren Metadaten bislang lediglich in unstrukturierter Form vorliegen, in die Lage versetzt werden, strukturierte Metadaten anzulegen, zu liefern und nachzunutzen. Dazu hat die KOBV-Zentrale das mit einer Web-Katalogisierungsschnittstelle ausgestattete "Metadata-Tool" entwickelt, das im Herbst 2004 in Betrieb genommen wird. Die für das Metadata-Sharing entwickelten Komponenten und Module sollen den Bibliotheken die Mehrfacherfassung ersparen und ihnen die Möglichkeit der wechselseitigen Nachnutzung der Metadaten eröffnen.
-
Ostergren, M.; Wright, G.: Creating a bibliographic database for a widely distributed collection (1998)
0.01
0.012179474 = product of:
0.036538422 = sum of:
0.036538422 = product of:
0.073076844 = sum of:
0.073076844 = weight(_text_:database in 1503) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.073076844 = score(doc=1503,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20452234 = queryWeight, product of:
4.042444 = idf(docFreq=2109, maxDocs=44218)
0.050593734 = queryNorm
0.35730496 = fieldWeight in 1503, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.042444 = idf(docFreq=2109, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1503)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
-
Park, S.: Usability, user preferences, effectiveness, and user behaviors when searching individual and integrated full-text databases : implications for digital libraries (2000)
0.01
0.010765236 = product of:
0.032295708 = sum of:
0.032295708 = product of:
0.064591415 = sum of:
0.064591415 = weight(_text_:database in 4591) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.064591415 = score(doc=4591,freq=4.0), product of:
0.20452234 = queryWeight, product of:
4.042444 = idf(docFreq=2109, maxDocs=44218)
0.050593734 = queryNorm
0.31581596 = fieldWeight in 4591, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
4.042444 = idf(docFreq=2109, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4591)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- This article addresses a crucial issue in the digital library environment: how to support effective interaction of users with heterogeneous and distributed information resources. In particular, this study compared usability, user preference, effectiveness, and searching behaviors in systems that implement interaction with multiple databases as if they were one (integrated interaction) in a experiment in the TREC environment. 28 volunteers were recruited from the graduate students of the School of Communication, Information & Library Studies at Rutgers University. Significantly more subjects preferred the common interface to the integrated interface, mainly because they could have more control over database selection. Subjects were also more satisfied with the results from the common interface, and performed better with the common interface than with the integrated interface. Overall, it appears that for this population, interacting with databases through a common interface is preferable on all grounds to interacting with databases through an integrated interface. These results suggest that: (1) the general assumption of the information retrieval (IR) literature that an integrated interaction is best needs to be revisited; (2) it is important to allow for more user control in the distributed environment; (3) for digital library purposes, it is important to characterize different databases to support user choice for integration; and (4) certain users prefer control over database selection while still opting for results to be merged
-
Sarinder, K.K.S.; Lim, L.H.S.; Merican, A.F.; Dimyati, K.: Biodiversity information retrieval across networked data sets (2010)
0.01
0.010765236 = product of:
0.032295708 = sum of:
0.032295708 = product of:
0.064591415 = sum of:
0.064591415 = weight(_text_:database in 3951) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.064591415 = score(doc=3951,freq=4.0), product of:
0.20452234 = queryWeight, product of:
4.042444 = idf(docFreq=2109, maxDocs=44218)
0.050593734 = queryNorm
0.31581596 = fieldWeight in 3951, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
4.042444 = idf(docFreq=2109, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3951)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- Purpose - Biodiversity resources are inevitably digital and stored in a wide variety of formats by researchers or stakeholders. In Malaysia, although digitizing biodiversity data has long been stressed, the interoperability of the biodiversity data is still an issue that requires attention. This is because, when data are shared, the question of copyright occurs, creating a setback among researchers wanting to promote or share data through online presentations. To solve this, the aim is to present an approach to integrate data through wrapping of datasets stored in relational databases located on networked platforms. Design/methodology/approach - The approach uses tools such as XML, PHP, ASP and HTML to integrate distributed databases in heterogeneous formats. Five current database integration systems were reviewed and all of them have common attributes such as query-oriented, using a mediator-based approach and integrating a structured data model. These common attributes were also adopted in the proposed solution. Distributed Generic Information Retrieval (DiGIR) was used as a model in designing the proposed solution. Findings - A new database integration system was developed, which is user-friendly and simple with common attributes found in current integration systems.
-
Stark, T.: ¬The Net and Z39.50 : toward a virtual union catalog (1997)
0.01
0.01065704 = product of:
0.03197112 = sum of:
0.03197112 = product of:
0.06394224 = sum of:
0.06394224 = weight(_text_:database in 3194) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06394224 = score(doc=3194,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20452234 = queryWeight, product of:
4.042444 = idf(docFreq=2109, maxDocs=44218)
0.050593734 = queryNorm
0.31264183 = fieldWeight in 3194, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.042444 = idf(docFreq=2109, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3194)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- The State Library of Iowa, USA, received a Higher Education Act title II grant from the US Dept. of Education in 1994 to create a demonstration project of new library information technologies. Describes 2 interlinked components of the project: Web-based union catalogue development and statewide deployment of the ANSI/NISO Z39.50 standard for database search and retrieval. Z39.50 was chosen because of its ability to searching multiple remote databases in a single session and its common interface across a variety of implementations. Use of a distributed Z39.50 search makes the need for maintaining large union catalogues unnecessary
-
Smith, N.: Z39.50 and the OPAC Network in Europe (ONE) Project (1996)
0.01
0.01065704 = product of:
0.03197112 = sum of:
0.03197112 = product of:
0.06394224 = sum of:
0.06394224 = weight(_text_:database in 3195) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06394224 = score(doc=3195,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20452234 = queryWeight, product of:
4.042444 = idf(docFreq=2109, maxDocs=44218)
0.050593734 = queryNorm
0.31264183 = fieldWeight in 3195, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.042444 = idf(docFreq=2109, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3195)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- Examines the use of the Z39.50 Information Retrieval protocol for provision of access to its collections. Z39.50 offers a translation of different search engines developed by library systems suppliers and online database hosts. Traces its development and describes its abstraction and metalanguage, and the TCP/IP and OSI layer. It is being further developed in project ONE - OPAC Network in Europe, and European Union Library Plan project which began in Jan 95, of which the British Library is a partner. It aims to link national library catalogues in an open standards and telecommunications network, and to achieve interoperability by use of Z39.50. Describes the project so far, agreements made, and future developments
-
Dempsey, L.; Russell, R.; Kirriemur, J.W.: Towards distributed library systems : Z39.50 in a European context (1996)
0.01
0.00913967 = product of:
0.02741901 = sum of:
0.02741901 = product of:
0.05483802 = sum of:
0.05483802 = weight(_text_:22 in 127) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05483802 = score(doc=127,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17717063 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.050593734 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 127, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=127)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Source
- Program. 30(1996) no.1, S.1-22
-
Ashton, J.: ONE: the final OPAC frontier (1998)
0.01
0.00913967 = product of:
0.02741901 = sum of:
0.02741901 = product of:
0.05483802 = sum of:
0.05483802 = weight(_text_:22 in 2588) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05483802 = score(doc=2588,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17717063 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.050593734 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2588, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2588)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Source
- Select newsletter. 1998, no.22, Spring, S.5-6
-
Lunau, C.D.: Z39.50: a critical component of the Canadian resource sharing infrastructure : implementation activities and results achieved (1997)
0.01
0.00913967 = product of:
0.02741901 = sum of:
0.02741901 = product of:
0.05483802 = sum of:
0.05483802 = weight(_text_:22 in 3193) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05483802 = score(doc=3193,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17717063 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.050593734 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3193, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3193)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Date
- 3. 3.1999 17:22:57
-
Burrows, T.: ¬The virtual catalogue : bibliographic access for the virtual library (1993)
0.01
0.00913967 = product of:
0.02741901 = sum of:
0.02741901 = product of:
0.05483802 = sum of:
0.05483802 = weight(_text_:22 in 5286) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05483802 = score(doc=5286,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17717063 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.050593734 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 5286, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5286)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Date
- 8.10.2000 14:47:22
-
Lynch, C.A.: Building the infrastructure of resource sharing : union catalogs, distributed search, and cross database linkage (1997)
0.01
0.009134606 = product of:
0.027403818 = sum of:
0.027403818 = product of:
0.054807637 = sum of:
0.054807637 = weight(_text_:database in 1506) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.054807637 = score(doc=1506,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20452234 = queryWeight, product of:
4.042444 = idf(docFreq=2109, maxDocs=44218)
0.050593734 = queryNorm
0.26797873 = fieldWeight in 1506, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.042444 = idf(docFreq=2109, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1506)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
-
Coyle, K.: ¬The virtual union catalog : a comparative study (2000)
0.01
0.009134606 = product of:
0.027403818 = sum of:
0.027403818 = product of:
0.054807637 = sum of:
0.054807637 = weight(_text_:database in 1230) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.054807637 = score(doc=1230,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20452234 = queryWeight, product of:
4.042444 = idf(docFreq=2109, maxDocs=44218)
0.050593734 = queryNorm
0.26797873 = fieldWeight in 1230, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.042444 = idf(docFreq=2109, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1230)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- A Virtual union catalog is a possible alternative to the centralized database of distributed resources found in many library systems. Such a catalog would not be maintained in a single location but would be created in real time by searching each local campus or affiliate library's catalog through the Z39.50 protocol. This would eliminate the redundancy of record storage as well as the expense of loading and maintaining access to the central catalog. This article describes a test implementation of a virtual union catalog for the University of California system. It describes some of the differences between the virtual catalog and the existing, centralized union catalog (MELVYL). The research described in the paper suggests enhancements that must be made if the virtual union catalog is to become a reasonable service alternative to the MELVYL® catalog.
-
Kaizik, A.; Gödert, W.; Milanesi, C.: Erfahrungen und Ergebnisse aus der Evaluierung des EU-Projektes EULER im Rahmen des an der FH Köln angesiedelten Projektes EJECT (Evaluation von Subject Gateways des World Wide Web (2001)
0.01
0.008078404 = product of:
0.02423521 = sum of:
0.02423521 = product of:
0.04847042 = sum of:
0.04847042 = weight(_text_:22 in 5801) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04847042 = score(doc=5801,freq=4.0), product of:
0.17717063 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.050593734 = queryNorm
0.27358043 = fieldWeight in 5801, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5801)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Date
- 22. 6.2002 19:42:22
