-
Riesthuis, G.J.A.: Some thoughts about the format of the Master Reference File database (2000)
0.26
0.25530562 = product of:
0.3829584 = sum of:
0.15701415 = weight(_text_:reference in 6405) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.15701415 = score(doc=6405,freq=4.0), product of:
0.205834 = queryWeight, product of:
4.0683694 = idf(docFreq=2055, maxDocs=44218)
0.050593734 = queryNorm
0.7628193 = fieldWeight in 6405, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
4.0683694 = idf(docFreq=2055, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6405)
0.22594428 = sum of:
0.109615274 = weight(_text_:database in 6405) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.109615274 = score(doc=6405,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20452234 = queryWeight, product of:
4.042444 = idf(docFreq=2109, maxDocs=44218)
0.050593734 = queryNorm
0.53595746 = fieldWeight in 6405, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.042444 = idf(docFreq=2109, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6405)
0.116329014 = weight(_text_:22 in 6405) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.116329014 = score(doc=6405,freq=4.0), product of:
0.17717063 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.050593734 = queryNorm
0.6565931 = fieldWeight in 6405, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6405)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Object
- UDC Master Reference File
- Source
- Extensions and corrections to the UDC. 22(2000), S.15-22
-
Ulrich, P.S.: Collaborative Digital Reference Service : Weltweites Projekt (2001)
0.14
0.13524824 = product of:
0.20287237 = sum of:
0.14803435 = weight(_text_:reference in 5649) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.14803435 = score(doc=5649,freq=2.0), product of:
0.205834 = queryWeight, product of:
4.0683694 = idf(docFreq=2055, maxDocs=44218)
0.050593734 = queryNorm
0.71919286 = fieldWeight in 5649, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.0683694 = idf(docFreq=2055, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=5649)
0.05483802 = product of:
0.10967604 = sum of:
0.10967604 = weight(_text_:22 in 5649) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.10967604 = score(doc=5649,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17717063 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.050593734 = queryNorm
0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 5649, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=5649)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Date
- 20. 4.2002 17:30:22
-
O'Neill, E.T.; Connaway, L.S.; Dickey, T.J.: Estimating the audience level for library resources (2008)
0.13
0.13462137 = product of:
0.20193204 = sum of:
0.074017175 = weight(_text_:reference in 6654) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.074017175 = score(doc=6654,freq=2.0), product of:
0.205834 = queryWeight, product of:
4.0683694 = idf(docFreq=2055, maxDocs=44218)
0.050593734 = queryNorm
0.35959643 = fieldWeight in 6654, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.0683694 = idf(docFreq=2055, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6654)
0.12791486 = sum of:
0.073076844 = weight(_text_:database in 6654) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.073076844 = score(doc=6654,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20452234 = queryWeight, product of:
4.042444 = idf(docFreq=2109, maxDocs=44218)
0.050593734 = queryNorm
0.35730496 = fieldWeight in 6654, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.042444 = idf(docFreq=2109, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6654)
0.05483802 = weight(_text_:22 in 6654) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05483802 = score(doc=6654,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17717063 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.050593734 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 6654, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6654)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- WorldCat, OCLC's bibliographic database, identifies books and the libraries that hold them. The holdings provide detailed information about the type and number of libraries that have acquired the material. Using this information, it is possible to infer the type of audience for which the material is intended. A quantitative measure, the audience level, is derived from the types of libraries that have selected the resource. The audience level can be used to refine discovery, analyze collections, advise readers, and enhance reference services.
- Date
- 8.11.2008 19:22:53
-
Kucianová, A.; Psohlavec, S.: Bilingual Slovak/English UDC Master Reference File on CD-ROM (2000)
0.13
0.13209511 = product of:
0.19814266 = sum of:
0.15701415 = weight(_text_:reference in 388) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.15701415 = score(doc=388,freq=4.0), product of:
0.205834 = queryWeight, product of:
4.0683694 = idf(docFreq=2055, maxDocs=44218)
0.050593734 = queryNorm
0.7628193 = fieldWeight in 388, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
4.0683694 = idf(docFreq=2055, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=388)
0.041128512 = product of:
0.082257025 = sum of:
0.082257025 = weight(_text_:22 in 388) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.082257025 = score(doc=388,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17717063 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.050593734 = queryNorm
0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 388, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=388)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Object
- UDC Master Reference file
- Source
- Extensions and corrections to the UDC. 22(2000), S.35-37
-
Riesthuis, G.J.A.: ¬A revised format for the Master Reference File database (2002)
0.13
0.12898153 = product of:
0.19347228 = sum of:
0.12953004 = weight(_text_:reference in 4762) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.12953004 = score(doc=4762,freq=2.0), product of:
0.205834 = queryWeight, product of:
4.0683694 = idf(docFreq=2055, maxDocs=44218)
0.050593734 = queryNorm
0.62929374 = fieldWeight in 4762, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.0683694 = idf(docFreq=2055, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4762)
0.06394224 = product of:
0.12788448 = sum of:
0.12788448 = weight(_text_:database in 4762) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.12788448 = score(doc=4762,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20452234 = queryWeight, product of:
4.042444 = idf(docFreq=2109, maxDocs=44218)
0.050593734 = queryNorm
0.62528366 = fieldWeight in 4762, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.042444 = idf(docFreq=2109, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4762)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
-
Riesthuis, G.J.A.: ¬A revised format for the Master Reference File database (2003)
0.13
0.12898153 = product of:
0.19347228 = sum of:
0.12953004 = weight(_text_:reference in 2005) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.12953004 = score(doc=2005,freq=2.0), product of:
0.205834 = queryWeight, product of:
4.0683694 = idf(docFreq=2055, maxDocs=44218)
0.050593734 = queryNorm
0.62929374 = fieldWeight in 2005, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.0683694 = idf(docFreq=2055, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=2005)
0.06394224 = product of:
0.12788448 = sum of:
0.12788448 = weight(_text_:database in 2005) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.12788448 = score(doc=2005,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20452234 = queryWeight, product of:
4.042444 = idf(docFreq=2109, maxDocs=44218)
0.050593734 = queryNorm
0.62528366 = fieldWeight in 2005, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.042444 = idf(docFreq=2109, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=2005)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
-
Matylonek, J.C.; Ottow, C.; Reese, T.: Organizing ready reference and administrative information with the reference desk manager (2001)
0.12
0.12375209 = product of:
0.18562813 = sum of:
0.14687328 = weight(_text_:reference in 1156) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.14687328 = score(doc=1156,freq=14.0), product of:
0.205834 = queryWeight, product of:
4.0683694 = idf(docFreq=2055, maxDocs=44218)
0.050593734 = queryNorm
0.7135521 = fieldWeight in 1156, product of:
3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
14.0 = termFreq=14.0
4.0683694 = idf(docFreq=2055, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1156)
0.03875485 = product of:
0.0775097 = sum of:
0.0775097 = weight(_text_:database in 1156) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0775097 = score(doc=1156,freq=4.0), product of:
0.20452234 = queryWeight, product of:
4.042444 = idf(docFreq=2109, maxDocs=44218)
0.050593734 = queryNorm
0.37897915 = fieldWeight in 1156, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
4.042444 = idf(docFreq=2109, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1156)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- Non-academic questions regarding special services, phone numbers, web-sites, library policies, current procedures, technical notices, and other pertinent local institutional information are often asked at the academic library reference desk. These frequent and urgent information requests require tools and resources to answer efficiently. Although ready reference collections at the desk provide a tool for academic information, specialized local information resources are more difficult to create and maintain. As reference desk responsibilities become increasingly complex and communication becomes more problematic, a web database to collect and manage this non-academic, local information can be very useful. At the Oregon State University, librarians in the Reference Services Management group created a custom-designed web-log bulletin board to deal with this non-academic, local information. The resulting database provides reference librarians a one-stop location for the information and makes it easier for them to update the information, via email, as conditions, procedures, and information needs change in their busy, highly computerized information commons.
-
Vizine-Goetz, D.: Dewey research : new uses for the DDC (2001)
0.11
0.11007925 = product of:
0.16511887 = sum of:
0.13084511 = weight(_text_:reference in 190) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.13084511 = score(doc=190,freq=4.0), product of:
0.205834 = queryWeight, product of:
4.0683694 = idf(docFreq=2055, maxDocs=44218)
0.050593734 = queryNorm
0.6356827 = fieldWeight in 190, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
4.0683694 = idf(docFreq=2055, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=190)
0.034273762 = product of:
0.068547525 = sum of:
0.068547525 = weight(_text_:22 in 190) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.068547525 = score(doc=190,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17717063 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.050593734 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 190, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=190)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- Bericht über verschiedene Forschungsprojekte bei OCLC im Umfeld der DDC (Renardus, DDC in the Collaborative Digital Reference Service (CDRS), OverView (Information Visualization using Dewey, NetFirst results categorized by Dewey)
- Date
- 22. 6.2002 19:32:34
- Footnote
- Vgl. auch: http://www.oclc.org/strategy/reference/cdrs/index.shtm
-
Carey, K.; Stringer, R.: ¬The power of nine : a preliminary investigation into navigation strategies for the new library with special reference to disabled people (2000)
0.10
0.10143618 = product of:
0.15215427 = sum of:
0.11102575 = weight(_text_:reference in 234) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.11102575 = score(doc=234,freq=2.0), product of:
0.205834 = queryWeight, product of:
4.0683694 = idf(docFreq=2055, maxDocs=44218)
0.050593734 = queryNorm
0.5393946 = fieldWeight in 234, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.0683694 = idf(docFreq=2055, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=234)
0.041128512 = product of:
0.082257025 = sum of:
0.082257025 = weight(_text_:22 in 234) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.082257025 = score(doc=234,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17717063 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.050593734 = queryNorm
0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 234, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=234)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Pages
- 22 S
-
Ma, W.: ¬A database selection expert system based on reference librarians's database selection strategy : a usability and empirical evaluation (2002)
0.09
0.08887648 = product of:
0.13331471 = sum of:
0.07850707 = weight(_text_:reference in 579) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07850707 = score(doc=579,freq=4.0), product of:
0.205834 = queryWeight, product of:
4.0683694 = idf(docFreq=2055, maxDocs=44218)
0.050593734 = queryNorm
0.38140965 = fieldWeight in 579, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
4.0683694 = idf(docFreq=2055, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=579)
0.054807637 = product of:
0.109615274 = sum of:
0.109615274 = weight(_text_:database in 579) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.109615274 = score(doc=579,freq=8.0), product of:
0.20452234 = queryWeight, product of:
4.042444 = idf(docFreq=2109, maxDocs=44218)
0.050593734 = queryNorm
0.53595746 = fieldWeight in 579, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
4.042444 = idf(docFreq=2109, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=579)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- The proliferation of digital information resources and electronic databases challenges libraries and demands that libraries develop new mechanisms to facilitate and better inform user selection of electronic databases and search tools. We developed a prototype, Web-based database selection expert system based on reference librarian's database selection strategy. This system allows users to simultaneously search all databases available to identify databases most relevant to their quests using free-text keywords or phrases taken directly from their research topics. This article reports on (1) the initial usability test and evaluation of the Selector-the test design, methodology used, performance results; (2) summary of search query analyses; (3) user satisfaction measures; (4) the use of the findings for further modification of the Selector; and (5) the findings of using randomly selected subjects to perform a usability test with predefined searching scenarios. Future prospects of this research have also been discussed in the article.
-
Scott, M.L.: Dewey Decimal Classification, 22nd edition : a study manual and number building guide (2005)
0.08
0.08453016 = product of:
0.12679523 = sum of:
0.09252147 = weight(_text_:reference in 4594) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09252147 = score(doc=4594,freq=2.0), product of:
0.205834 = queryWeight, product of:
4.0683694 = idf(docFreq=2055, maxDocs=44218)
0.050593734 = queryNorm
0.44949555 = fieldWeight in 4594, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.0683694 = idf(docFreq=2055, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4594)
0.034273762 = product of:
0.068547525 = sum of:
0.068547525 = weight(_text_:22 in 4594) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.068547525 = score(doc=4594,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17717063 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.050593734 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 4594, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4594)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- This work has been fully updated for the 22nd edition of DDC, and is used as reference for the application of Dewey coding or as a course text in the Dewey System
- Object
- DDC-22
-
Gaulé, P.: Access to scientific literature in India (2009)
0.08
0.08237514 = product of:
0.1235627 = sum of:
0.09159158 = weight(_text_:reference in 3108) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09159158 = score(doc=3108,freq=4.0), product of:
0.205834 = queryWeight, product of:
4.0683694 = idf(docFreq=2055, maxDocs=44218)
0.050593734 = queryNorm
0.4449779 = fieldWeight in 3108, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
4.0683694 = idf(docFreq=2055, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3108)
0.03197112 = product of:
0.06394224 = sum of:
0.06394224 = weight(_text_:database in 3108) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06394224 = score(doc=3108,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20452234 = queryWeight, product of:
4.042444 = idf(docFreq=2109, maxDocs=44218)
0.050593734 = queryNorm
0.31264183 = fieldWeight in 3108, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.042444 = idf(docFreq=2109, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3108)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- This article uses an evidence-based approach to assess the difficulties faced by developing country scientists in accessing scientific literature. I compare the backward citation patterns of Swiss and Indian scientists in a database of 43,150 scientific papers published by scientists from either country in 2007. Controlling for fields and quality with citing journal fixed effects, I find that Indian scientists have shorter reference lists (-6%) and are more likely to cite articles from open access journals (+50%). Moreover, the difference in the length of the reference list is more pronounced in biology and medicine, where circulation of (free) preprints and conference proceedings is non-existent. Informal file-sharing practices among scientists mitigate the effects of access restrictions.
-
Atkins, H.; Lyons, C.; Ratner, H.; Risher, C.; Shillum, C.; Sidman, D.; Stevens, A.: Reference linking with DOIs : a case study (2000)
0.08
0.07817462 = product of:
0.117261924 = sum of:
0.07850707 = weight(_text_:reference in 1229) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07850707 = score(doc=1229,freq=4.0), product of:
0.205834 = queryWeight, product of:
4.0683694 = idf(docFreq=2055, maxDocs=44218)
0.050593734 = queryNorm
0.38140965 = fieldWeight in 1229, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
4.0683694 = idf(docFreq=2055, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1229)
0.03875485 = product of:
0.0775097 = sum of:
0.0775097 = weight(_text_:database in 1229) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0775097 = score(doc=1229,freq=4.0), product of:
0.20452234 = queryWeight, product of:
4.042444 = idf(docFreq=2109, maxDocs=44218)
0.050593734 = queryNorm
0.37897915 = fieldWeight in 1229, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
4.042444 = idf(docFreq=2109, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1229)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- DOI-X is a prototype metadata database designed to support DOI lookups. The prototype is intended to address the integration of metadata registration and maintenance with basic DOI registration and maintenance, enabling publishers to use a single mechanism and a single quality-assurance process to register both DOIs and their associated metadata. It also contains the lookup mechanisms necessary to access the journal article metadata, both on a single-item lookup basis and on a batch basis, such as would facilitate reference linking. The prototype database was introduced and demonstrated to attendees at the STM International Meeting and the Frankfurt Book Fair in October 1999. This paper discusses the background for the creation of DOI-X and its salient features.
-
Miller, D.; Olson, T.; Layne, S.S.: Promoting research and best practices in subject reference structures : a decade of work by the subject analysis committee (2005)
0.08
0.077810265 = product of:
0.116715394 = sum of:
0.096151136 = weight(_text_:reference in 123) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.096151136 = score(doc=123,freq=6.0), product of:
0.205834 = queryWeight, product of:
4.0683694 = idf(docFreq=2055, maxDocs=44218)
0.050593734 = queryNorm
0.4671295 = fieldWeight in 123, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
4.0683694 = idf(docFreq=2055, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=123)
0.020564256 = product of:
0.041128512 = sum of:
0.041128512 = weight(_text_:22 in 123) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.041128512 = score(doc=123,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17717063 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.050593734 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 123, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=123)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- In 2004, the ALCTS (Association for Library Collections & Technical Services) Cataloging and Classification Section Subject Analysis Committee (SAC) produced the report Recommendations for Providing Access to, Display of, Navigation within and among, and Modifications of Existing Practice Regarding Subject Reference Structures in Automated Systems. This document is one important outcome of nearly ten years' work by three SAC (Subject Analysis Committee) subcommittees investigating the theoretical, pragmatic, and political dimensions of improving subject access through better use of reference structure data. The work of those subcommittees is reviewed and their recommendations are described and summarized. Potential future effects of the report are discussed, as is a snapshot view of several major automation systems' current compliance with the recommendations.
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
-
Witschel, H.F.: Global term weights in distributed environments (2008)
0.08
0.077810265 = product of:
0.116715394 = sum of:
0.096151136 = weight(_text_:reference in 2096) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.096151136 = score(doc=2096,freq=6.0), product of:
0.205834 = queryWeight, product of:
4.0683694 = idf(docFreq=2055, maxDocs=44218)
0.050593734 = queryNorm
0.4671295 = fieldWeight in 2096, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
4.0683694 = idf(docFreq=2055, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2096)
0.020564256 = product of:
0.041128512 = sum of:
0.041128512 = weight(_text_:22 in 2096) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.041128512 = score(doc=2096,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17717063 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.050593734 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2096, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2096)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- This paper examines the estimation of global term weights (such as IDF) in information retrieval scenarios where a global view on the collection is not available. In particular, the two options of either sampling documents or of using a reference corpus independent of the target retrieval collection are compared using standard IR test collections. In addition, the possibility of pruning term lists based on frequency is evaluated. The results show that very good retrieval performance can be reached when just the most frequent terms of a collection - an "extended stop word list" - are known and all terms which are not in that list are treated equally. However, the list cannot always be fully estimated from a general-purpose reference corpus, but some "domain-specific stop words" need to be added. A good solution for achieving this is to mix estimates from small samples of the target retrieval collection with ones derived from a reference corpus.
- Date
- 1. 8.2008 9:44:22
-
Salvesen, G.: Is the library able to find the answer? (2005)
0.08
0.077810265 = product of:
0.116715394 = sum of:
0.096151136 = weight(_text_:reference in 3009) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.096151136 = score(doc=3009,freq=6.0), product of:
0.205834 = queryWeight, product of:
4.0683694 = idf(docFreq=2055, maxDocs=44218)
0.050593734 = queryNorm
0.4671295 = fieldWeight in 3009, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
4.0683694 = idf(docFreq=2055, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3009)
0.020564256 = product of:
0.041128512 = sum of:
0.041128512 = weight(_text_:22 in 3009) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.041128512 = score(doc=3009,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17717063 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.050593734 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3009, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3009)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- To answer this question I need a theoretical discussion of the aspects that have implication on the quality of the reference service, and an empirical study of the service. By combining theories from the field of reference service, service, goods quality and service quality, I propose six factors related to the total quality of the reference service: The library, the servicescape, the librarian, the user and the answer. From these aspects I have in this paper chosen to focus on the librarian's ability to communicate with the user. The empirical study consists of an analysis of 20 dialogs conversations between user and librarian. The analysis has its theoretical and conceptual roots in Conversation Analysis or CA.
- Date
- 22. 7.2009 10:54:45
-
Blosser, J.; Michaelson, R.; Routh. R.; Xia, P.: Defining the landscape of Web resources : Concluding Report of the BAER Web Resources Sub-Group (2000)
0.08
0.07753032 = product of:
0.11629547 = sum of:
0.052338045 = weight(_text_:reference in 1447) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.052338045 = score(doc=1447,freq=4.0), product of:
0.205834 = queryWeight, product of:
4.0683694 = idf(docFreq=2055, maxDocs=44218)
0.050593734 = queryNorm
0.2542731 = fieldWeight in 1447, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
4.0683694 = idf(docFreq=2055, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1447)
0.06395743 = sum of:
0.036538422 = weight(_text_:database in 1447) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.036538422 = score(doc=1447,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20452234 = queryWeight, product of:
4.042444 = idf(docFreq=2109, maxDocs=44218)
0.050593734 = queryNorm
0.17865248 = fieldWeight in 1447, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.042444 = idf(docFreq=2109, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1447)
0.02741901 = weight(_text_:22 in 1447) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02741901 = score(doc=1447,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17717063 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.050593734 = queryNorm
0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 1447, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1447)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- The BAER Web Resources Group was charged in October 1999 with defining and describing the parameters of electronic resources that do not clearly belong to the categories being defined by the BAER Digital Group or the BAER Electronic Journals Group. After some difficulty identifying precisely which resources fell under the Group's charge, we finally named the following types of resources for our consideration: web sites, electronic texts, indexes, databases and abstracts, online reference resources, and networked and non-networked CD-ROMs. Electronic resources are a vast and growing collection that touch nearly every department within the Library. It is unrealistic to think one department can effectively administer all aspects of the collection. The Group then began to focus on the concern of bibliographic access to these varied resources, and to define parameters for handling or processing them within the Library. Some key elements became evident as the work progressed. * Selection process of resources to be acquired for the collection * Duplication of effort * Use of CORC * Resource Finder design * Maintenance of Resource Finder * CD-ROMs not networked * Communications * Voyager search limitations. An unexpected collaboration with the Web Development Committee on the Resource Finder helped to steer the Group to more detailed descriptions of bibliographic access. This collaboration included development of data elements for the Resource Finder database, and some discussions on Library staff processing of the resources. The Web Resources Group invited expert testimony to help the Group broaden its view to envision public use of the resources and discuss concerns related to technical services processing. The first testimony came from members of the Resource Finder Committee. Some background information on the Web Development Resource Finder Committee was shared. The second testimony was from librarians who select electronic texts. Three main themes were addressed: accessing CD-ROMs; the issue of including non-networked CD-ROMs in the Resource Finder; and, some special concerns about electronic texts. The third testimony came from librarians who select indexes and abstracts and also provide Reference services. Appendices to this report include minutes of the meetings with the experts (Appendix A), a list of proposed data elements to be used in the Resource Finder (Appendix B), and recommendations made to the Resource Finder Committee (Appendix C). Below are summaries of the key elements.
- Date
- 21. 4.2002 10:22:31
-
Lüdtke, H.: Secret Patrons, Invisible Users : Digital Reference @ Your Library: Fundstücke einer nicht nur virtuellen Erkundung in den USA (2004)
0.08
0.07705548 = product of:
0.11558321 = sum of:
0.09159158 = weight(_text_:reference in 2295) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09159158 = score(doc=2295,freq=4.0), product of:
0.205834 = queryWeight, product of:
4.0683694 = idf(docFreq=2055, maxDocs=44218)
0.050593734 = queryNorm
0.4449779 = fieldWeight in 2295, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
4.0683694 = idf(docFreq=2055, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2295)
0.023991633 = product of:
0.047983266 = sum of:
0.047983266 = weight(_text_:22 in 2295) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.047983266 = score(doc=2295,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17717063 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.050593734 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2295, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2295)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Date
- 22. 3.2004 14:50:05
- Footnote
- Mit einer Zusammenstellung: Facets of Quality for Digital reference"
-
Guerrero-Bote, V.P.; Moya Anegón, F. de; Herrero Solana, V.: Document organization using Kohonen's algorithm (2002)
0.07
0.073703736 = product of:
0.1105556 = sum of:
0.074017175 = weight(_text_:reference in 2564) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.074017175 = score(doc=2564,freq=2.0), product of:
0.205834 = queryWeight, product of:
4.0683694 = idf(docFreq=2055, maxDocs=44218)
0.050593734 = queryNorm
0.35959643 = fieldWeight in 2564, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.0683694 = idf(docFreq=2055, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2564)
0.036538422 = product of:
0.073076844 = sum of:
0.073076844 = weight(_text_:database in 2564) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.073076844 = score(doc=2564,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20452234 = queryWeight, product of:
4.042444 = idf(docFreq=2109, maxDocs=44218)
0.050593734 = queryNorm
0.35730496 = fieldWeight in 2564, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.042444 = idf(docFreq=2109, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2564)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- The classification of documents from a bibliographic database is a task that is linked to processes of information retrieval based on partial matching. A method is described of vectorizing reference documents from LISA which permits their topological organization using Kohonen's algorithm. As an example a map is generated of 202 documents from LISA, and an analysis is made of the possibilities of this type of neural network with respect to the development of information retrieval systems based on graphical browsing.
-
Taylor, M.: Using the Google search appliance for federated searching : a case study (2005)
0.07
0.073703736 = product of:
0.1105556 = sum of:
0.074017175 = weight(_text_:reference in 355) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.074017175 = score(doc=355,freq=2.0), product of:
0.205834 = queryWeight, product of:
4.0683694 = idf(docFreq=2055, maxDocs=44218)
0.050593734 = queryNorm
0.35959643 = fieldWeight in 355, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.0683694 = idf(docFreq=2055, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=355)
0.036538422 = product of:
0.073076844 = sum of:
0.073076844 = weight(_text_:database in 355) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.073076844 = score(doc=355,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20452234 = queryWeight, product of:
4.042444 = idf(docFreq=2109, maxDocs=44218)
0.050593734 = queryNorm
0.35730496 = fieldWeight in 355, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.042444 = idf(docFreq=2109, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=355)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- This article discusses the University of Nevada, Reno's experiment of federated searching with version 4.1 of the Google Search Appliance. The project's testbed included locally held CONTENTdm and geospatial data collections and a sample of records from EBSCO's Academic Search Premiere database. The latter set of records revealed the GSA's limitations in being able to index and retrieve content that is dynamically generated and that requires third party authentication.
- Series
- Internet reference services quarterly. 10(2005) nos.3/4
