-
Bates, M.J.: Learning about the information seeking of interdisciplinary scholars and students (1996)
0.04
0.0443785 = product of:
0.088757 = sum of:
0.088757 = sum of:
0.031999324 = weight(_text_:library in 7181) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.031999324 = score(doc=7181,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13768692 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
0.052364815 = queryNorm
0.23240642 = fieldWeight in 7181, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7181)
0.056757677 = weight(_text_:22 in 7181) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.056757677 = score(doc=7181,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18337266 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052364815 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 7181, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7181)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 14. 4.1997 20:22:55
- Source
- Library trends. 45(1996) no.2, S.155-164
-
Bates, M.J.: Speculations on browsing, directed searching, and linking in relation to the Bradford distribution (2002)
0.03
0.033283874 = product of:
0.06656775 = sum of:
0.06656775 = sum of:
0.023999494 = weight(_text_:library in 54) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.023999494 = score(doc=54,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13768692 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
0.052364815 = queryNorm
0.17430481 = fieldWeight in 54, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=54)
0.042568255 = weight(_text_:22 in 54) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.042568255 = score(doc=54,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18337266 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052364815 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 54, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=54)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 2.2007 18:56:23
- Source
- Emerging frameworks and methods: Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on the Conceptions of Library and Information Science (CoLIS4), Seattle, WA, July 21 - 25, 2002. Eds.: Fidel, R., H. Bruce, P. Ingwersen u. P. Vakkari
-
Bates, M.J.: Fundamental forms of information (2006)
0.02
0.017558511 = product of:
0.035117023 = sum of:
0.035117023 = product of:
0.070234045 = sum of:
0.070234045 = weight(_text_:22 in 2746) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.070234045 = score(doc=2746,freq=4.0), product of:
0.18337266 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052364815 = queryNorm
0.38301262 = fieldWeight in 2746, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2746)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 3.2009 18:15:22
-
Bates, M.J.: Rethinking subject cataloging in the online environment (1989)
0.02
0.015999662 = product of:
0.031999324 = sum of:
0.031999324 = product of:
0.06399865 = sum of:
0.06399865 = weight(_text_:library in 119) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06399865 = score(doc=119,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13768692 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
0.052364815 = queryNorm
0.46481284 = fieldWeight in 119, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=119)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Library resources and technical services. 33(1989), S.400-412
-
Bates, M.J.: Information science at the University of California at Berkeley in the 1960s : a memoir of student days (2004)
0.01
0.013856115 = product of:
0.02771223 = sum of:
0.02771223 = product of:
0.05542446 = sum of:
0.05542446 = weight(_text_:library in 7246) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05542446 = score(doc=7246,freq=6.0), product of:
0.13768692 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
0.052364815 = queryNorm
0.40253976 = fieldWeight in 7246, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7246)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- The author's experiences as a master's and doctoral student at the University of California at Berkeley School of Library and Information Studies during a formative period in the history of information science, 1966-71, are described. The relationship between documentation and information science as experienced in that program is discussed, as well as the various influences, both social and intellectual, that shaped the author's understanding of information science at that time.
- Footnote
- Beitrag in einem Themenheft: Pioneers in library and information science
- Source
- Library trends. 52(2004) no.4, S.683-701
-
Bates, M.J.: Improving user access to library catalog and portal information (2004)
0.01
0.01131347 = product of:
0.02262694 = sum of:
0.02262694 = product of:
0.04525388 = sum of:
0.04525388 = weight(_text_:library in 2593) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04525388 = score(doc=2593,freq=4.0), product of:
0.13768692 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
0.052364815 = queryNorm
0.32867232 = fieldWeight in 2593, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2593)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- In this lecture, Dr. Bates summarizes the research she recently conducted in her role as a Principal Investigator for the Library of Congress Action Plan on Bibliographic Control of Web Resources. Her investigations focused on three particular topics: User access vocabulary, Links among bibliographic families, and Staging of access to resources in the interface. From each of these perspectives, she shares her recommendations on how to achieve enhanced access to and display of records for selected Web resources across multiple systems.
-
Mizrachi, D.; Bates, M.J.: Undergraduates' personal academic information management and the consideration of time and task-urgency (2013)
0.01
0.008868387 = product of:
0.017736774 = sum of:
0.017736774 = product of:
0.035473548 = sum of:
0.035473548 = weight(_text_:22 in 1003) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.035473548 = score(doc=1003,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18337266 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052364815 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1003, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1003)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Young undergraduate college students are often described as "digital natives," presumed to prefer living and working in completely digital information environments. In reality, their world is part-paper/part-digital, in constant transition among successive forms of digital storage and communication devices. Studying for a degree is the daily work of these young people, and effective management of paper and digital academic materials and resources contributes crucially to their success in life. Students must also constantly manage their work against deadlines to meet their course and university requirements. This study, following the "Personal Information Management" (PIM) paradigm, examines student academic information management under these various constraints and pressures. A total of 41 18- to 22-year-old students were interviewed and observed regarding the content, structure, and uses of their immediate working environment within their dormitory rooms. Students exhibited remarkable creativity and variety in the mixture of automated and manual resources and devices used to support their academic work. The demands of a yearlong procession of assignments, papers, projects, and examinations increase the importance of time management activities and influence much of their behavior. Results provide insights on student use of various kinds of information technology and their overall planning and management of information associated with their studies.
-
Bates, M.J.: ¬The Getty End-User Online Searching Project in the humanities, report no.6 : overview and conclusions (1996)
0.01
0.007999831 = product of:
0.015999662 = sum of:
0.015999662 = product of:
0.031999324 = sum of:
0.031999324 = weight(_text_:library in 7261) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.031999324 = score(doc=7261,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13768692 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
0.052364815 = queryNorm
0.23240642 = fieldWeight in 7261, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7261)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Over a 2 year period, the Getty Information Institute (formerly the Getty Art History Information Program) sponsored and carried out a major study of end user online searching by humanities scholars. Complete logs of the searches and output were captured, and the 27 scholars involved were interviewed in depth. Reviews the study and its results, with particular emphasis on matters of interest to academic librarians. Implications are drawn for academic library reference service and collection development, as well as for cataloguing in the online and digital environment
-
Bates, M.J.: Information behavior (2009)
0.01
0.007999831 = product of:
0.015999662 = sum of:
0.015999662 = product of:
0.031999324 = sum of:
0.031999324 = weight(_text_:library in 3760) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.031999324 = score(doc=3760,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13768692 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
0.052364815 = queryNorm
0.23240642 = fieldWeight in 3760, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3760)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Encyclopedia of library and information sciences. 3rd ed. Ed.: M.J. Bates
-
Bates, M.J.: Defining the information disciplines in encyclopedia development (2007)
0.01
0.0070709186 = product of:
0.014141837 = sum of:
0.014141837 = product of:
0.028283674 = sum of:
0.028283674 = weight(_text_:library in 3400) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.028283674 = score(doc=3400,freq=4.0), product of:
0.13768692 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
0.052364815 = queryNorm
0.2054202 = fieldWeight in 3400, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3400)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Introduction. Dramatic changes in society and in the information disciplines and professions constituted the basis for a re-conceptualization of the content of the Encyclopedia of Library and Information Sciences. Method. Marcia J. Bates and Mary Niles Maack, Editors of the forthcoming Third Edition, working with a fifty-person Editorial Advisory Board, developed the new, projected contents list for the encyclopedia, based upon principles developed in the re-conceptualization. Analysis. Drawing on Bates' "Invisible Substrate of Information Science" article, and other sources, the information disciplines are seen as consisting of the "disciplines of the cultural record" and the "information sciences." These disciplines are all concerned with the collection, organization and access to information, across the entire traditional spectrum of disciplines, such as the humanities and natural and social sciences. Results. The disciplines covered in the encyclopedia are library and information science, archival science, records management, information systems, informatics, knowledge management, museum studies, bibliography, document and genre studies, and social studies of information. A variety of cognate disciplines are briefly covered as well. Conclusions. The information disciplines are coming into their own in the 21st century. They are increasingly prominent in universities and in society generally, and, possibly with the help of the encyclopedia, may come increasingly to be seen as a set of related disciplines traversing a spectrum of their own.
-
Bates, M.J.: ¬The nature of browsing (2019)
0.01
0.0069998526 = product of:
0.013999705 = sum of:
0.013999705 = product of:
0.02799941 = sum of:
0.02799941 = weight(_text_:library in 2265) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02799941 = score(doc=2265,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13768692 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
0.052364815 = queryNorm
0.20335563 = fieldWeight in 2265, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2265)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Content
- Bezug (Letter to the editor) zu: McKay, D., Chang, S.,, Smith, W., Buchanan, G.: The things we talk about when we talk about browsing: an empirical typology of library browsing behavior. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology (2019).
-
Bates, M.J.: Concepts for the study of information embodiment (2018)
0.01
0.0069280574 = product of:
0.013856115 = sum of:
0.013856115 = product of:
0.02771223 = sum of:
0.02771223 = weight(_text_:library in 5525) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02771223 = score(doc=5525,freq=6.0), product of:
0.13768692 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
0.052364815 = queryNorm
0.20126988 = fieldWeight in 5525, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5525)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Footnote
- Vgl.: DOI: 10.1353/lib.2018.0002. Vgl. auch den Kommentar in: Lueg, C.: To be or not to be (embodied): that is not the question. In: Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 71(2020) no.1, S.114-117. (Opinion paper) Two articles in a recent special issue on Information and the Body published in the journal Library Trends stand out because of the way they are identifying, albeit indirectly, a formidable challenge to library information science (LIS). In her contribution, Bates warns that understanding information behavior demands recognizing and studying "any one important element of the ecology [in which humans are embedded]." Hartel, on the other hand, suggests that LIS would not lose much but would have lots to gain by focusing on core LIS themes instead of embodied information, since the latter may be unproductive, as LIS scholars are "latecomer[s] to a mature research domain." I would argue that LIS as a discipline cannot avoid dealing with those pesky mammals aka patrons or users; like the cognate discipline and "community of communities" human computer interaction (HCI), LIS needs the interdisciplinarity to succeed. LIS researchers are uniquely positioned to help bring together LIS's deep understanding of "information" and embodiment perspectives that may or may not have been developed in other disciplines. LIS researchers need to be more explicit about what their original contribution is, though, and what may have been appropriated from other disciplines.
- Source
- Library trends. 66(2018) no.3, S.239-266
-
Bates, M.J.: Information (2009)
0.01
0.0059998734 = product of:
0.011999747 = sum of:
0.011999747 = product of:
0.023999494 = sum of:
0.023999494 = weight(_text_:library in 3721) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.023999494 = score(doc=3721,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13768692 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
0.052364815 = queryNorm
0.17430481 = fieldWeight in 3721, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3721)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Encyclopedia of library and information sciences. 3rd ed. Ed.: M.J. Bates
-
Bates, M.J.; Wilde, D.N.; Siegfried, S.: ¬An analysis of search terminology used by humanities scholars : the Getty online searching project report number 1 (1993)
0.00
0.0049998946 = product of:
0.009999789 = sum of:
0.009999789 = product of:
0.019999579 = sum of:
0.019999579 = weight(_text_:library in 2707) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.019999579 = score(doc=2707,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13768692 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
0.052364815 = queryNorm
0.14525402 = fieldWeight in 2707, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2707)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Library quarterly. 63(1993) no.1, S.1-39
