Search (173 results, page 1 of 9)

  • × theme_ss:"Katalogfragen allgemein"
  1. Hafter, R.: ¬The performance of card catalogs : a review of research (1979) 0.09
    0.088757 = product of:
      0.177514 = sum of:
        0.177514 = sum of:
          0.06399865 = weight(_text_:library in 3069) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.06399865 = score(doc=3069,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.13768692 = queryWeight, product of:
                2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052364815 = queryNorm
              0.46481284 = fieldWeight in 3069, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
                0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=3069)
          0.113515355 = weight(_text_:22 in 3069) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.113515355 = score(doc=3069,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18337266 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052364815 = queryNorm
              0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 3069, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=3069)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    3.10.2000 20:48:22
    Source
    Library research. 1(1979), S.199-222
  2. Tennant, R.: ¬The print perplex : building the future catalog (1998) 0.09
    0.088757 = product of:
      0.177514 = sum of:
        0.177514 = sum of:
          0.06399865 = weight(_text_:library in 6462) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.06399865 = score(doc=6462,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.13768692 = queryWeight, product of:
                2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052364815 = queryNorm
              0.46481284 = fieldWeight in 6462, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
                0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=6462)
          0.113515355 = weight(_text_:22 in 6462) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.113515355 = score(doc=6462,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18337266 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052364815 = queryNorm
              0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 6462, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=6462)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Library journal. 123(1998) no.19, S.22-24
  3. Aliprand, J.M.: ¬The Unicode Standard : its scope, design prin. ciples, and prospects for international cataloging (2000) 0.06
    0.055473126 = product of:
      0.11094625 = sum of:
        0.11094625 = sum of:
          0.039999157 = weight(_text_:library in 4608) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.039999157 = score(doc=4608,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.13768692 = queryWeight, product of:
                2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052364815 = queryNorm
              0.29050803 = fieldWeight in 4608, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
                0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4608)
          0.070947096 = weight(_text_:22 in 4608) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.070947096 = score(doc=4608,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18337266 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052364815 = queryNorm
              0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 4608, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4608)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
    Source
    Library resources and technical services. 44(2000) no.3, S.160-167
  4. Hillmann, D.I.: "Parallel universes" or meaningful relationships : envisioning a future for the OPAC and the net (1996) 0.05
    0.05100578 = product of:
      0.10201156 = sum of:
        0.10201156 = sum of:
          0.04525388 = weight(_text_:library in 5581) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.04525388 = score(doc=5581,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.13768692 = queryWeight, product of:
                2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052364815 = queryNorm
              0.32867232 = fieldWeight in 5581, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5581)
          0.056757677 = weight(_text_:22 in 5581) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.056757677 = score(doc=5581,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18337266 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052364815 = queryNorm
              0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 5581, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5581)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Over the past year, innumerable discussions on the relationship between traditional library OPACs and the newly burgeoning World WideWeb have occured in many libraries and in virtually every library related discussion list. Rumors and speculation abound, some insisting that SGML will replace USMARC "soon," others maintaining that OPACs that haven't migrated to the Web will go the way of the dinosaurs.
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 22(1996) nos.3/4, S.97-103
  5. El-Sherbini, M.A.: Cataloging and classification : review of the literature 2005-06 (2008) 0.05
    0.05100578 = product of:
      0.10201156 = sum of:
        0.10201156 = sum of:
          0.04525388 = weight(_text_:library in 249) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.04525388 = score(doc=249,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.13768692 = queryWeight, product of:
                2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052364815 = queryNorm
              0.32867232 = fieldWeight in 249, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=249)
          0.056757677 = weight(_text_:22 in 249) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.056757677 = score(doc=249,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18337266 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052364815 = queryNorm
              0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 249, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=249)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    This paper reviews library literature on cataloging and classification published in 2005-06. It covers pertinent literature in the following areas: the future of cataloging; Functional Requirement for Bibliographic Records (FRBR); metadata and its applications and relation to Machine-Readable Cataloging (MARC); cataloging tools and standards; authority control; and recruitment, training, and the changing role of catalogers.
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
    Source
    Library resources and technical services. 52(2008) no.3, S.148-163
  6. Budd, J.: Exploring categorization : undergraduate student searching and the evolution of catalogs (2007) 0.05
    0.05100578 = product of:
      0.10201156 = sum of:
        0.10201156 = sum of:
          0.04525388 = weight(_text_:library in 256) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.04525388 = score(doc=256,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.13768692 = queryWeight, product of:
                2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052364815 = queryNorm
              0.32867232 = fieldWeight in 256, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=256)
          0.056757677 = weight(_text_:22 in 256) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.056757677 = score(doc=256,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18337266 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052364815 = queryNorm
              0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 256, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=256)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Debate about the future of library catalogs and cataloging has been, and continues to be, featured in the literature of librarianship. Some research into the ways undergraduate students at one institution assign subjects to selected works provides insight into the cognitive elements of categorization. The design of catalogs can be informed by this research, as well as work currently being done on alternative means of organization, such as information systems ontologies.
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
    Source
    Library resources and technical services. 51(2007) no.4, S.286-292
  7. Marcum, D.B.: ¬The future of cataloging (2006) 0.05
    0.049079686 = product of:
      0.09815937 = sum of:
        0.09815937 = sum of:
          0.048496403 = weight(_text_:library in 114) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.048496403 = score(doc=114,freq=6.0), product of:
              0.13768692 = queryWeight, product of:
                2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052364815 = queryNorm
              0.3522223 = fieldWeight in 114, product of:
                2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                  6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=114)
          0.049662966 = weight(_text_:22 in 114) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.049662966 = score(doc=114,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18337266 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052364815 = queryNorm
              0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 114, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=114)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    This paper explores cataloging in the Age of Google. It considers what the technologies now being adopted mean for cataloging in the future. The author begins by exploring how digital-era students do research-they find using Google easier than using libraries. Mass digitization projects now are bringing into question the role that library cataloging has traditionally performed. The author asks readers to consider if the detailed attention librarians have been paying to descriptive cataloging can still be justified, and if cost-effective means for access should be considered.
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
    Footnote
    Vgl. auch: http://www.loc.gov/library/reports/CatalogingSpeech.pdf.
    Source
    Library resources and technical services. 50(2006) no.1, S.xx-xx
  8. LeBlanc, J.; Kurth, M.: ¬An operational model for library metadata maintenance (2008) 0.05
    0.04707051 = product of:
      0.09414102 = sum of:
        0.09414102 = sum of:
          0.033940412 = weight(_text_:library in 101) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.033940412 = score(doc=101,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.13768692 = queryWeight, product of:
                2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052364815 = queryNorm
              0.24650425 = fieldWeight in 101, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=101)
          0.06020061 = weight(_text_:22 in 101) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.06020061 = score(doc=101,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.18337266 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052364815 = queryNorm
              0.32829654 = fieldWeight in 101, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=101)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
    19. 6.2010 19:22:28
    Source
    Library resources and technical services. 52(2008) no.1, S.54-59
  9. Arsenault, C.; Ménard, E.: Searching titles with initial articles in library catalogs : a case study and search behavior analysis (2007) 0.05
    0.045283623 = product of:
      0.090567246 = sum of:
        0.090567246 = sum of:
          0.047998987 = weight(_text_:library in 2264) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.047998987 = score(doc=2264,freq=8.0), product of:
              0.13768692 = queryWeight, product of:
                2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052364815 = queryNorm
              0.34860963 = fieldWeight in 2264, product of:
                2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                  8.0 = termFreq=8.0
                2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2264)
          0.042568255 = weight(_text_:22 in 2264) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.042568255 = score(doc=2264,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18337266 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052364815 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2264, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2264)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    This study examines problems caused by initial articles in library catalogs. The problematic records observed are those whose titles begin with a word erroneously considered to be an article at the retrieval stage. Many retrieval algorithms edit queries by removing initial words corresponding to articles found in an exclusion list even whether the initial word is an article or not. Consequently, a certain number of documents remain more difficult to find. The study also examines user behavior during known-item retrieval using the title index in library catalogs, concentrating on the problems caused by the presence of an initial article or of a word homograph to an article. Measures of success and effectiveness are taken to determine if retrieval is affected in such cases.
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
    Source
    Library resources and technical services. 51(2007) no.3, S.190-203
  10. Solis, A.Q.; Navarrete, O.A.: Medidas de calidad en la creacion de catalogos de bibliotecas (1998) 0.04
    0.044630054 = product of:
      0.08926011 = sum of:
        0.08926011 = sum of:
          0.039597142 = weight(_text_:library in 2825) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.039597142 = score(doc=2825,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.13768692 = queryWeight, product of:
                2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052364815 = queryNorm
              0.28758827 = fieldWeight in 2825, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2825)
          0.049662966 = weight(_text_:22 in 2825) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.049662966 = score(doc=2825,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18337266 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052364815 = queryNorm
              0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2825, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2825)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    A discussion of the importance of clear cataloguing policies and routines as the basis of quality control, in relation to the methods used in the College of Mexico Library. The fundamental principle is to prevent errors occuring rather than to correct them subsequently. Indices of quality and effiency in relation to errors which do and do not affect retrieval, established through monthly review of samples of the work of each cataloguer, are used to monitor activities and ensure high standards. This process, essentially collaborative, promotes an overall culture of quality
    Date
    30. 1.1999 19:22:45
    Footnote
    Übers. des Titels: Measures of quality in the creation of library catalogues
  11. Randall, N.B.: Spelling errors in the database : shadow or substance? (1999) 0.04
    0.044630054 = product of:
      0.08926011 = sum of:
        0.08926011 = sum of:
          0.039597142 = weight(_text_:library in 106) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.039597142 = score(doc=106,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.13768692 = queryWeight, product of:
                2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052364815 = queryNorm
              0.28758827 = fieldWeight in 106, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=106)
          0.049662966 = weight(_text_:22 in 106) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.049662966 = score(doc=106,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18337266 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052364815 = queryNorm
              0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 106, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=106)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Describes the results of research to determine the extent of spelling errors in the State University of New York at Albany's online catalogue, whether these errors seriously affect users' access to library materials and what effect spelling errors will have on the group database planned for the State University of New York (SUNY). Using standard database tests, the catalogues of the four SUNY University Centers (Albany, Binghamton, Buffalo and Stony Brook) were studied. In addition, two comparison catalogues were studied: the New York State Library's Excelsior and California University's Melvyl. Results show that misspellings are unavoidable due to the way that most catalogues were built. These errors, however, are rarely an impediment to retrieval. Concludes with suggested ways to find and correct misspellings without expensive large scale efforts
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
    Source
    Library resources and technical services. 43(1999) no.3, S.161-169
  12. Visintin, G.: Passaggi (1998) 0.04
    0.0443785 = product of:
      0.088757 = sum of:
        0.088757 = sum of:
          0.031999324 = weight(_text_:library in 3053) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.031999324 = score(doc=3053,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.13768692 = queryWeight, product of:
                2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052364815 = queryNorm
              0.23240642 = fieldWeight in 3053, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3053)
          0.056757677 = weight(_text_:22 in 3053) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.056757677 = score(doc=3053,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18337266 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052364815 = queryNorm
              0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3053, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3053)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Examines in detail the author cataloguing practices adopted by the Italian National Library Service, as set out in its 1995 Cataloguing Guide (Guida SBN), and discusses how far these practices accord with the standard 1979 RICA author cataloguing rules. Since the author headings prescribed by RICA include personal names, corporate names and titles, this survey looks at all such SBN catalogue entries having an access point function. Presents many examples of standard and variant forms of heading, and reviews control procedures
    Date
    22. 2.1999 20:40:57
  13. Miksa, S.D.: ¬The challenges of change : a review of cataloging and classification literature, 2003-2004 (2007) 0.04
    0.0443785 = product of:
      0.088757 = sum of:
        0.088757 = sum of:
          0.031999324 = weight(_text_:library in 266) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.031999324 = score(doc=266,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.13768692 = queryWeight, product of:
                2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052364815 = queryNorm
              0.23240642 = fieldWeight in 266, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=266)
          0.056757677 = weight(_text_:22 in 266) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.056757677 = score(doc=266,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18337266 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052364815 = queryNorm
              0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 266, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=266)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
    Source
    Library resources and technical services. 51(2007) no.1, S.51-68
  14. Hillmann, D.I.: 'Parallel universes' or meaningful relationships : envisioning a future for the OPAC and the net (1996) 0.04
    0.03883119 = product of:
      0.07766238 = sum of:
        0.07766238 = sum of:
          0.02799941 = weight(_text_:library in 3656) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.02799941 = score(doc=3656,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.13768692 = queryWeight, product of:
                2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052364815 = queryNorm
              0.20335563 = fieldWeight in 3656, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3656)
          0.049662966 = weight(_text_:22 in 3656) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.049662966 = score(doc=3656,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18337266 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052364815 = queryNorm
              0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 3656, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3656)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Briefly follows the debate concerning: the relationship between traditional library OPACs and the WWW; possible replacement of USMARC format with SGML; and the possible demise of OPACs that do not migrate to the WWW. Discusses the approach taken by the Text encoding Initative (TEI) in their use of a mandatory TEI header in their standard SGML application as the first since CIP to explore attaching bibliographic information to the item itself to assist cataloguing
    Series
    Cataloging and classification quarterly; vol.22, nos.3/4
  15. Morgan, E.L.: Possible solutions for incorporating digital information mediums into traditional library cataloging services (1996) 0.04
    0.03883119 = product of:
      0.07766238 = sum of:
        0.07766238 = sum of:
          0.02799941 = weight(_text_:library in 600) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.02799941 = score(doc=600,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.13768692 = queryWeight, product of:
                2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052364815 = queryNorm
              0.20335563 = fieldWeight in 600, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=600)
          0.049662966 = weight(_text_:22 in 600) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.049662966 = score(doc=600,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18337266 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052364815 = queryNorm
              0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 600, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=600)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 22(1996) nos.3/4, S.143-170
  16. McMillan, G.: Electronic theses and dissertations : merging perspectives (1996) 0.04
    0.03883119 = product of:
      0.07766238 = sum of:
        0.07766238 = sum of:
          0.02799941 = weight(_text_:library in 601) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.02799941 = score(doc=601,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.13768692 = queryWeight, product of:
                2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052364815 = queryNorm
              0.20335563 = fieldWeight in 601, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=601)
          0.049662966 = weight(_text_:22 in 601) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.049662966 = score(doc=601,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18337266 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052364815 = queryNorm
              0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 601, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=601)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Theses and dissertations as electronic files transferred from the student author to the Graduate School to the Library may well be the first major source of electronic texts that many libraries encounter. To prepare for this potential influx of electronic texts, an ad hoc task force considered work flow and cataloging guidelines. The author suggests expanding current theses cataloging and taking advantage of online information prepared by authors so that the bibliographic records provide OPACS with much more valuable information than does traditional theses cataloging. This should not require a lot of extra work.
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 22(1996) nos.3/4, S.105-125
  17. Byrum, J.D.: ¬The emerging global bibliographical network : the era of international standardization in the development of cataloging policy (2000) 0.04
    0.03505692 = product of:
      0.07011384 = sum of:
        0.07011384 = sum of:
          0.03464029 = weight(_text_:library in 190) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.03464029 = score(doc=190,freq=6.0), product of:
              0.13768692 = queryWeight, product of:
                2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052364815 = queryNorm
              0.25158736 = fieldWeight in 190, product of:
                2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                  6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=190)
          0.035473548 = weight(_text_:22 in 190) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.035473548 = score(doc=190,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18337266 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052364815 = queryNorm
              0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 190, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=190)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Catalogers have become interdependent in their pursuit to provide bibliographic control and access. This interdependency has brought with it the need for greater agreement in applying common cataloging policies and rules. The expanded application of AACR2 (Anglo-American Cataloguing Rules) is fostering greater uniformity in the provision of bibliographic description and access. The rules have been translated into numerous languages and used in European, Middle Eastern, and Latin American countries. Cataloging committees and individual libraries in Europe and South Africa have expressed strong interest in adopting, adapting, or aligning with AACR2. PCC (Program for Cooperative Cataloguing) is one of the most successful cooperative cataloging efforts and has a considerable international component, which encourages the use of AACR, LCSH (Library of Congress Subject Headings), and MARC. AACR2 is successful on an international level because it is based in internationally developed standards, including ISBDs and the Paris Principles. ISBDs (International Standard Bibliographic Description) and the Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records are examples of the contributions that IFLA (International Federation of Library Associations and Institutions) has made to the internationalization of cataloging. IFLA sponsored the international conference that resulted in the Paris Principles as well as subsequent projects to craft international policy in relation to uniform headings for persons, corporate bodies, and titles.
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
    Source
    Library resources and technical services. 44(2000) no.3, S.114-121
  18. Bates, M.J.: Speculations on browsing, directed searching, and linking in relation to the Bradford distribution (2002) 0.03
    0.033283874 = product of:
      0.06656775 = sum of:
        0.06656775 = sum of:
          0.023999494 = weight(_text_:library in 54) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.023999494 = score(doc=54,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.13768692 = queryWeight, product of:
                2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052364815 = queryNorm
              0.17430481 = fieldWeight in 54, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=54)
          0.042568255 = weight(_text_:22 in 54) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.042568255 = score(doc=54,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18337266 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052364815 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 54, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=54)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 2.2007 18:56:23
    Source
    Emerging frameworks and methods: Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on the Conceptions of Library and Information Science (CoLIS4), Seattle, WA, July 21 - 25, 2002. Eds.: Fidel, R., H. Bruce, P. Ingwersen u. P. Vakkari
  19. Leazer, G.H.; Smiraglia, R.P.: Bibliographic families in the library catalog : a qualitative analysis and grounded theory (1999) 0.03
    0.031878613 = product of:
      0.063757226 = sum of:
        0.063757226 = sum of:
          0.028283674 = weight(_text_:library in 107) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.028283674 = score(doc=107,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.13768692 = queryWeight, product of:
                2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052364815 = queryNorm
              0.2054202 = fieldWeight in 107, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=107)
          0.035473548 = weight(_text_:22 in 107) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.035473548 = score(doc=107,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18337266 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052364815 = queryNorm
              0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 107, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=107)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
    Source
    Library resources and technical services. 43(1999) no.4, S.191-212
  20. Homan, P.A.: Library catalog notes for "bad books" : ethics vs. responsibilities (2012) 0.03
    0.031878613 = product of:
      0.063757226 = sum of:
        0.063757226 = sum of:
          0.028283674 = weight(_text_:library in 420) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.028283674 = score(doc=420,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.13768692 = queryWeight, product of:
                2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052364815 = queryNorm
              0.2054202 = fieldWeight in 420, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=420)
          0.035473548 = weight(_text_:22 in 420) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.035473548 = score(doc=420,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18337266 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052364815 = queryNorm
              0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 420, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=420)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    The conflict between librarians' ethics and their responsibilities in the process of progressive collection management, which applies the principles of cost accounting to libraries, to call attention to the "bad books" in their collections that are compromised by age, error, abridgement, expurgation, plagiarism, copyright violation, libel, or fraud, is discussed. According to Charles Cutter, notes in catalog records should call attention to the best books but ignore the bad ones. Libraries that can afford to keep their "bad books," however, which often have a valuable second life, must call attention to their intellectual contexts in notes in the catalog records. Michael Bellesiles's Arming America, the most famous case of academic fraud at the turn of the twenty-first century, is used as a test case. Given the bias of content enhancement that automatically pulls content from the Web into library catalogs, catalog notes for "bad books" may be the only way for librarians to uphold their ethical principles regarding collection management while fulfilling their professional responsibilities to their users in calling attention to their "bad books."
    Date
    27. 9.2012 14:22:00

Authors

Languages

Types

  • a 151
  • el 16
  • m 8
  • r 5
  • s 5
  • b 3
  • x 1
  • More… Less…