Search (92 results, page 1 of 5)

0.032429837 = product of:
  0.0972895 = sum of:
    0.0972895 = sum of:
      0.062473677 = weight(_text_:digital in 600) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.062473677 = score(doc=600,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.14480425 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
            0.03670994 = queryNorm
          0.43143538 = fieldWeight in 600, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=600)
      0.03481583 = weight(_text_:22 in 600) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.03481583 = score(doc=600,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.12855195 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.03670994 = queryNorm
          0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 600, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=600)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Abstract

This article first compares and contrasts the essential, fundamental differences between traditional and digital information mediums. It then reexamines the role of the online public access catalog (OPAC), refines the definition of library's catalog, and advocates the addition of Internet resources within the OPAC. Next, the article describes the building of the Alex Catalog, a catalog of Internet resources in the in the form of MARC records. Finally, this article outlines a process of integrating the futher inclusion of other Internet resources into OPACs as well as some of the obstacles such a process manifests.

Source

Cataloging and classification quarterly. 22(1996) nos.3/4, S.143-170

0.018807475 = product of:
  0.05642242 = sum of:
    0.05642242 = sum of:
      0.03155397 = weight(_text_:digital in 731) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.03155397 = score(doc=731,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.14480425 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
            0.03670994 = queryNorm
          0.21790776 = fieldWeight in 731, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=731)
      0.02486845 = weight(_text_:22 in 731) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.02486845 = score(doc=731,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.12855195 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.03670994 = queryNorm
          0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 731, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=731)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Date

2.12.2007 19:39:22

Footnote

Beitrag eines Themenheftes "Profiles in digital information"

0.016214918 = product of:
  0.04864475 = sum of:
    0.04864475 = sum of:
      0.031236839 = weight(_text_:digital in 1429) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.031236839 = score(doc=1429,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.14480425 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
            0.03670994 = queryNorm
          0.21571769 = fieldWeight in 1429, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
            0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=1429)
      0.017407915 = weight(_text_:22 in 1429) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.017407915 = score(doc=1429,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.12855195 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.03670994 = queryNorm
          0.1354154 = fieldWeight in 1429, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=1429)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Abstract

Pauline Atherton Cochrane has been contributing to library and information science for fifty years. Think of it-from mid-century to the millennium, from ENIAC (practically) to Internet 11 (almost here). What a time to be in our field! Her work an indexing, subject access, and the user-oriented approach had immediate and sustained impact, and she continues to be one of our most heavily cited authors (see, JASIS, 49[4], 327-55) and most beloved personages. This introduction includes a few words about my own experiences with Pauline as well as a short summary of the contributions that make up this tribute. A review of the curriculum vita provided at the end of this publication Shows that Pauline Cochrane has been involved in a wide variety of work. As Marcia Bates points out in her note (See below), Pauline was (and is) a role model, but I will always think of her as simply the best teacher 1 ever had. In 1997, I entered the University of Illinois Graduate School of Library and Information Science as a returning mid-life student; my previous doctorate had not led to a full-time job and I was re-tooling. I was not sure what 1 would find in library school, and the introductory course attended by more than 100 students from widely varied backgrounds had not yet convinced me I was in the right place. Then, one day, Pauline gave a guest lecture an the digital library in my introductory class. I still remember it. She put up some notes-a few words clustered an the blackboard with some circles and directional arrows-and then she gave a free, seemingly extemporaneous, but riveting narrative. She set out a vision for ideal information exchange in the digital environment but noted a host of practical concerns, issues, and potential problems that required (demanded!) continued human intervention. The lecture brought that class and the entire semester's work into focus; it created tremendous excitement for the future of librarianship. 1 saw that librarians and libraries would play an active role. I was in the right place.

Date

22. 9.1997 19:16:05

0.015045978 = product of:
  0.045137934 = sum of:
    0.045137934 = sum of:
      0.025243176 = weight(_text_:digital in 1447) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.025243176 = score(doc=1447,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.14480425 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
            0.03670994 = queryNorm
          0.17432621 = fieldWeight in 1447, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
            0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1447)
      0.019894758 = weight(_text_:22 in 1447) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.019894758 = score(doc=1447,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.12855195 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.03670994 = queryNorm
          0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 1447, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1447)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Abstract

The BAER Web Resources Group was charged in October 1999 with defining and describing the parameters of electronic resources that do not clearly belong to the categories being defined by the BAER Digital Group or the BAER Electronic Journals Group. After some difficulty identifying precisely which resources fell under the Group's charge, we finally named the following types of resources for our consideration: web sites, electronic texts, indexes, databases and abstracts, online reference resources, and networked and non-networked CD-ROMs. Electronic resources are a vast and growing collection that touch nearly every department within the Library. It is unrealistic to think one department can effectively administer all aspects of the collection. The Group then began to focus on the concern of bibliographic access to these varied resources, and to define parameters for handling or processing them within the Library. Some key elements became evident as the work progressed. * Selection process of resources to be acquired for the collection * Duplication of effort * Use of CORC * Resource Finder design * Maintenance of Resource Finder * CD-ROMs not networked * Communications * Voyager search limitations. An unexpected collaboration with the Web Development Committee on the Resource Finder helped to steer the Group to more detailed descriptions of bibliographic access. This collaboration included development of data elements for the Resource Finder database, and some discussions on Library staff processing of the resources. The Web Resources Group invited expert testimony to help the Group broaden its view to envision public use of the resources and discuss concerns related to technical services processing. The first testimony came from members of the Resource Finder Committee. Some background information on the Web Development Resource Finder Committee was shared. The second testimony was from librarians who select electronic texts. Three main themes were addressed: accessing CD-ROMs; the issue of including non-networked CD-ROMs in the Resource Finder; and, some special concerns about electronic texts. The third testimony came from librarians who select indexes and abstracts and also provide Reference services. Appendices to this report include minutes of the meetings with the experts (Appendix A), a list of proposed data elements to be used in the Resource Finder (Appendix B), and recommendations made to the Resource Finder Committee (Appendix C). Below are summaries of the key elements.

Date

21. 4.2002 10:22:31

0.0132631725 = product of:
  0.039789516 = sum of:
    0.039789516 = product of:
      0.07957903 = sum of:
        0.07957903 = weight(_text_:22 in 7403) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07957903 = score(doc=7403,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12855195 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03670994 = queryNorm
            0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 7403, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=7403)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Source

Program. 22(1988), S.21-31

0.0132631725 = product of:
  0.039789516 = sum of:
    0.039789516 = product of:
      0.07957903 = sum of:
        0.07957903 = weight(_text_:22 in 7483) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07957903 = score(doc=7483,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12855195 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03670994 = queryNorm
            0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 7483, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=7483)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Source

Program. 22(1988), S.133-142

0.012621589 = product of:
  0.037864767 = sum of:
    0.037864767 = product of:
      0.075729534 = sum of:
        0.075729534 = weight(_text_:digital in 1773) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.075729534 = score(doc=1773,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14480425 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03670994 = queryNorm
            0.52297866 = fieldWeight in 1773, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1773)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

0.011723099 = product of:
  0.035169296 = sum of:
    0.035169296 = product of:
      0.07033859 = sum of:
        0.07033859 = weight(_text_:22 in 4368) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07033859 = score(doc=4368,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.12855195 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03670994 = queryNorm
            0.54716086 = fieldWeight in 4368, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4368)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Date

22. 1.2000 19:36:10
22. 1.2000 19:41:58

0.011605277 = product of:
  0.03481583 = sum of:
    0.03481583 = product of:
      0.06963166 = sum of:
        0.06963166 = weight(_text_:22 in 3628) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06963166 = score(doc=3628,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12855195 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03670994 = queryNorm
            0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 3628, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3628)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Source

Bulletin des bibliothèques de France. 34(1989) no.1, S.22-47

0.011605277 = product of:
  0.03481583 = sum of:
    0.03481583 = product of:
      0.06963166 = sum of:
        0.06963166 = weight(_text_:22 in 5575) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06963166 = score(doc=5575,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12855195 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03670994 = queryNorm
            0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 5575, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=5575)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Footnote

Eine Replik zu Auer: OPAC und Zeichensatz (Mitteilungen der VÖB 46(1993) H.2, S.21-22)

0.011605277 = product of:
  0.03481583 = sum of:
    0.03481583 = product of:
      0.06963166 = sum of:
        0.06963166 = weight(_text_:22 in 7584) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06963166 = score(doc=7584,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12855195 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03670994 = queryNorm
            0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 7584, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=7584)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Source

Mitteilungen der Vereinigung Österreichischer Bibliothekare. 46(1993) H.2, S.21-22

0.011605277 = product of:
  0.03481583 = sum of:
    0.03481583 = product of:
      0.06963166 = sum of:
        0.06963166 = weight(_text_:22 in 211) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06963166 = score(doc=211,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12855195 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03670994 = queryNorm
            0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 211, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=211)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Source

Open. 22(1990) no.10, S.326-330

0.011605277 = product of:
  0.03481583 = sum of:
    0.03481583 = product of:
      0.06963166 = sum of:
        0.06963166 = weight(_text_:22 in 4513) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06963166 = score(doc=4513,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12855195 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03670994 = queryNorm
            0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 4513, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4513)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Date

23. 3.2000 15:22:58

0.0104122795 = product of:
  0.031236839 = sum of:
    0.031236839 = product of:
      0.062473677 = sum of:
        0.062473677 = weight(_text_:digital in 922) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.062473677 = score(doc=922,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.14480425 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03670994 = queryNorm
            0.43143538 = fieldWeight in 922, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=922)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Abstract

The library, centre of the local network of educational, social and cultural establishments, introduced its multimedia catalogue in 1994. Records assessed by graphic interfaces include all documents and supports: users can call up accompanying text, images, audiovisual extracts, using a series of simple menus. For the librarians, maintaining the catalogue, converting documents into digital form and creating links is time consuming and needs special skills, but the impact on collection use and enhancement of the library's image are considerable, while the availability of digital copies helps conserve fragile documents

0.0104122795 = product of:
  0.031236839 = sum of:
    0.031236839 = product of:
      0.062473677 = sum of:
        0.062473677 = weight(_text_:digital in 232) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.062473677 = score(doc=232,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.14480425 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03670994 = queryNorm
            0.43143538 = fieldWeight in 232, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=232)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Abstract

This paper examines some traditional information searching methods and their role in Hungarian OPACs. What challenges are there in the digital and online environment? How do users work with them and do they give users satisfactory results? What kinds of techniques are users employing? In this paper I examine the user interfaces of UDC, thesauri, subject headings etc. in the Hungarian library. The key question of the paper is whether a universal system or local solutions is the best approach for searching in the digital environment.

0.0104122795 = product of:
  0.031236839 = sum of:
    0.031236839 = product of:
      0.062473677 = sum of:
        0.062473677 = weight(_text_:digital in 2541) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.062473677 = score(doc=2541,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.14480425 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03670994 = queryNorm
            0.43143538 = fieldWeight in 2541, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2541)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Abstract

Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to provide an overview of the OPAC integration in the University of Michigan's local implementation of materials digitized in the partnership with Google. Design/methodology/approach - The paper provides a discussion of different strategies used in integrating metadata with digital resources and presenting the digital objects to the user in the OPAC. Findings - The paper finds that methods that had served in smaller digitization projects require more automation and error reduction processes in an undertaking of this scale. Increased integration with the OPAC is one approach. Originality/value - Michigan is the first of the Google partners to mount their materials themselves and others involved in mass digitization may be interested in the experience.

0.009947379 = product of:
  0.029842136 = sum of:
    0.029842136 = product of:
      0.059684273 = sum of:
        0.059684273 = weight(_text_:22 in 3373) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.059684273 = score(doc=3373,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12855195 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03670994 = queryNorm
            0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 3373, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3373)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Date

22. 4.1996 20:07:57

0.009947379 = product of:
  0.029842136 = sum of:
    0.029842136 = product of:
      0.059684273 = sum of:
        0.059684273 = weight(_text_:22 in 4106) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.059684273 = score(doc=4106,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12855195 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03670994 = queryNorm
            0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 4106, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4106)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Date

22. 4.1996 20:07:57

0.008924812 = product of:
  0.026774434 = sum of:
    0.026774434 = product of:
      0.05354887 = sum of:
        0.05354887 = weight(_text_:digital in 5012) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05354887 = score(doc=5012,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.14480425 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03670994 = queryNorm
            0.36980176 = fieldWeight in 5012, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5012)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Abstract

According to the Calhoun report, library operations that are not digital, that do not result in resources that are remotely accessible, that involve professional human judgement or expertise, or that require conceptual categorization and standardization rather than relevance ranking of keywords, do not fit into its proposed "leadership" strategy. This strategy itself, however, is based on an inappropriate business model - and a misrepresentation of that business model to begin with. The Calhoun report draws unjustified conclusions about the digital age, inflates wishful thinking, fails to make critical distinctions, and disregards (as well as mischaracterizes) an alternative "niche" strategy for research libraries, to promote scholarship (rather than increase "market position"). Its recommendations to eliminate Library of Congress Subject Headings, and to use "fast turnaround" time as the "gold standard" in cataloging, are particularly unjustified, and would have serious negative consequences for the capacity of research libraries to promote scholarly research.

0.008924812 = product of:
  0.026774434 = sum of:
    0.026774434 = product of:
      0.05354887 = sum of:
        0.05354887 = weight(_text_:digital in 3851) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05354887 = score(doc=3851,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.14480425 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03670994 = queryNorm
            0.36980176 = fieldWeight in 3851, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3851)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Abstract

The Online Public Access Catalog (OPAC) is an information retrieval system characterized by short bibliographic records, mainly of books, journals, and audiovisual materials available in a particular library. This, coupled with a Boolean search interface and a heterogeneous user population with diverse needs, presents special problems for subject searching by end users. To perform effective subject searching in the OPAC system requires a wide range of knowledge and skills. Various approaches to improving the OPAC design for subject searching have been proposed and are reviewed in this entry. The trend toward Web-based OPAC interfaces and the developments in Internet and digital library technologies present fresh opportunities for enhancing the effectiveness of the OPAC system for subject searching.

Content

Digital unter: http://dx.doi.org/10.1081/E-ELIS3-120008863. Vgl.: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/book/10.1081/E-ELIS3.