Search (16 results, page 1 of 1)

Booth, A.: How consistent is MEDLINE indexing? (1990) 0.04

0.03743542 = product of:
  0.093588546 = sum of:
    0.044199787 = weight(_text_:7 in 3510) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.044199787 = score(doc=3510,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.17251469 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.3127685 = idf(docFreq=4376, maxDocs=44218)
          0.052075688 = queryNorm
        0.25620884 = fieldWeight in 3510, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.3127685 = idf(docFreq=4376, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3510)
    0.04938876 = weight(_text_:22 in 3510) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.04938876 = score(doc=3510,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.18236019 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.052075688 = queryNorm
        0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 3510, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3510)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)

Source: Health libraries review. 7(1990) no.1, S.22-26

Cleverdon, C.W.: ASLIB Cranfield Research Project : Report on the first stage of an investigation into the comparative efficiency of indexing systems (1960) 0.02

0.016933288 = product of:
  0.08466644 = sum of:
    0.08466644 = weight(_text_:22 in 6158) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.08466644 = score(doc=6158,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.18236019 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.052075688 = queryNorm
        0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 6158, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6158)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)

Footnote: Rez. in: College and research libraries 22(1961) no.3, S.228 (G. Jahoda)

Veenema, F.: To index or not to index (1996) 0.01

0.011288859 = product of:
  0.056444295 = sum of:
    0.056444295 = weight(_text_:22 in 7247) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.056444295 = score(doc=7247,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.18236019 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.052075688 = queryNorm
        0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 7247, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7247)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)

Source: Canadian journal of information and library science. 21(1996) no.2, S.1-22

Neshat, N.; Horri, A.: ¬A study of subject indexing consistency between the National Library of Iran and Humanities Libraries in the area of Iranian studies (2006) 0.01

0.009877752 = product of:
  0.04938876 = sum of:
    0.04938876 = weight(_text_:22 in 230) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.04938876 = score(doc=230,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.18236019 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.052075688 = queryNorm
        0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 230, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=230)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)

Date: 4. 1.2007 10:22:26

Chen, X.: Indexing consistency between online catalogues (2008) 0.01
```
0.008929707 = product of:
  0.044648536 = sum of:
    0.044648536 = weight(_text_:7 in 2209) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.044648536 = score(doc=2209,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.17251469 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.3127685 = idf(docFreq=4376, maxDocs=44218)
          0.052075688 = queryNorm
        0.25881004 = fieldWeight in 2209, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.3127685 = idf(docFreq=4376, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2209)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
```
Abstract

In der globalen Online-Umgebung stellen viele bibliographische Dienstleistungen integrierten Zugang zu unterschiedlichen internetbasierten OPACs zur Verfügung. In solch einer Umgebung erwarten Benutzer mehr Übereinstimmungen innerhalb und zwischen den Systemen zu sehen. Zweck dieser Studie ist, die Indexierungskonsistenz zwischen Systemen zu untersuchen. Währenddessen werden einige Faktoren, die die Indexierungskonsistenz beeinflussen können, untersucht. Wichtigstes Ziel dieser Studie ist, die Gründe für die Inkonsistenzen herauszufinden, damit sinnvolle Vorschläge gemacht werden können, um die Indexierungskonsistenz zu verbessern. Eine Auswahl von 3307 Monographien wurde aus zwei chinesischen bibliographischen Katalogen gewählt. Nach Hooper's Formel war die durchschnittliche Indexierungskonsistenz für Indexterme 64,2% und für Klassennummern 61,6%. Nach Rolling's Formel war sie für Indexterme 70,7% und für Klassennummern 63,4%. Mehrere Faktoren, die die Indexierungskonsistenz beeinflussen, wurden untersucht: (1) Indexierungsbereite; (2) Indexierungsspezifizität; (3) Länge der Monographien; (4) Kategorie der Indexierungssprache; (5) Sachgebiet der Monographien; (6) Entwicklung von Disziplinen; (7) Struktur des Thesaurus oder der Klassifikation; (8) Erscheinungsjahr. Gründe für die Inkonsistenzen wurden ebenfalls analysiert. Die Analyse ergab: (1) den Indexieren mangelt es an Fachwissen, Vertrautheit mit den Indexierungssprachen und den Indexierungsregeln, so dass viele Inkonsistenzen verursacht wurden; (2) der Mangel an vereinheitlichten oder präzisen Regeln brachte ebenfalls Inkonsistenzen hervor; (3) verzögerte Überarbeitungen der Indexierungssprachen, Mangel an terminologischer Kontrolle, zu wenige Erläuterungen und "siehe auch" Referenzen, sowie die hohe semantische Freiheit bei der Auswahl von Deskriptoren oder Klassen, verursachten Inkonsistenzen.

Date

7. 9.2015 18:54:58

Moreiro-González, J.-A.; Bolaños-Mejías, C.: Folksonomy indexing from the assignment of free tags to setup subject : a search analysis into the domain of legal history (2018) 0.01

0.008929707 = product of:
  0.044648536 = sum of:
    0.044648536 = weight(_text_:7 in 4640) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.044648536 = score(doc=4640,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.17251469 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.3127685 = idf(docFreq=4376, maxDocs=44218)
          0.052075688 = queryNorm
        0.25881004 = fieldWeight in 4640, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.3127685 = idf(docFreq=4376, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4640)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)

Content: DOI:10.5771/0943-7444-2018-7-574.
Source: Knowledge organization. 45(2018) no.7, S.574-585

Boll, J.J.: DDC classification rules : an outline history and comparison of two sets of rules (1988) 0.01

0.008839957 = product of:
  0.044199787 = sum of:
    0.044199787 = weight(_text_:7 in 404) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.044199787 = score(doc=404,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.17251469 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.3127685 = idf(docFreq=4376, maxDocs=44218)
          0.052075688 = queryNorm
        0.25620884 = fieldWeight in 404, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.3127685 = idf(docFreq=4376, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=404)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)

Date: 7. 1.2007 14:45:08

Biagetti, M.T.: Indexing and scientific research needs (2006) 0.01

0.008839957 = product of:
  0.044199787 = sum of:
    0.044199787 = weight(_text_:7 in 235) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.044199787 = score(doc=235,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.17251469 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.3127685 = idf(docFreq=4376, maxDocs=44218)
          0.052075688 = queryNorm
        0.25620884 = fieldWeight in 235, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.3127685 = idf(docFreq=4376, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=235)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)

Source: Knowledge organization for a global learning society: Proceedings of the 9th International ISKO Conference, 4-7 July 2006, Vienna, Austria. Hrsg.: G. Budin, C. Swertz u. K. Mitgutsch

Taniguchi, S.: Recording evidence in bibliographic records and descriptive metadata (2005) 0.01

0.008466644 = product of:
  0.04233322 = sum of:
    0.04233322 = weight(_text_:22 in 3565) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.04233322 = score(doc=3565,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.18236019 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.052075688 = queryNorm
        0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3565, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3565)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)

Date: 18. 6.2005 13:16:22

Leininger, K.: Interindexer consistency in PsychINFO (2000) 0.01

0.008466644 = product of:
  0.04233322 = sum of:
    0.04233322 = weight(_text_:22 in 2552) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.04233322 = score(doc=2552,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.18236019 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.052075688 = queryNorm
        0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2552, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2552)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)

Date: 9. 2.1997 18:44:22

Rodriguez Bravo, B.: ¬The visibility of women in indexing languages (2006) 0.01

0.0075771073 = product of:
  0.037885536 = sum of:
    0.037885536 = weight(_text_:7 in 263) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.037885536 = score(doc=263,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.17251469 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.3127685 = idf(docFreq=4376, maxDocs=44218)
          0.052075688 = queryNorm
        0.21960759 = fieldWeight in 263, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.3127685 = idf(docFreq=4376, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=263)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)

Source: Knowledge organization for a global learning society: Proceedings of the 9th International ISKO Conference, 4-7 July 2006, Vienna, Austria. Hrsg.: G. Budin, C. Swertz u. K. Mitgutsch

Subrahmanyam, B.: Library of Congress Classification numbers : issues of consistency and their implications for union catalogs (2006) 0.01

0.007055537 = product of:
  0.035277683 = sum of:
    0.035277683 = weight(_text_:22 in 5784) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.035277683 = score(doc=5784,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.18236019 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.052075688 = queryNorm
        0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 5784, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5784)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)

Date: 10. 9.2000 17:38:22

White, H.; Willis, C.; Greenberg, J.: HIVEing : the effect of a semantic web technology on inter-indexer consistency (2014) 0.01
```
0.007055537 = product of:
  0.035277683 = sum of:
    0.035277683 = weight(_text_:22 in 1781) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.035277683 = score(doc=1781,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.18236019 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.052075688 = queryNorm
        0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1781, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1781)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
```
Abstract

Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to examine the effect of the Helping Interdisciplinary Vocabulary Engineering (HIVE) system on the inter-indexer consistency of information professionals when assigning keywords to a scientific abstract. This study examined first, the inter-indexer consistency of potential HIVE users; second, the impact HIVE had on consistency; and third, challenges associated with using HIVE. Design/methodology/approach - A within-subjects quasi-experimental research design was used for this study. Data were collected using a task-scenario based questionnaire. Analysis was performed on consistency results using Hooper's and Rolling's inter-indexer consistency measures. A series of t-tests was used to judge the significance between consistency measure results. Findings - Results suggest that HIVE improves inter-indexing consistency. Working with HIVE increased consistency rates by 22 percent (Rolling's) and 25 percent (Hooper's) when selecting relevant terms from all vocabularies. A statistically significant difference exists between the assignment of free-text keywords and machine-aided keywords. Issues with homographs, disambiguation, vocabulary choice, and document structure were all identified as potential challenges. Research limitations/implications - Research limitations for this study can be found in the small number of vocabularies used for the study. Future research will include implementing HIVE into the Dryad Repository and studying its application in a repository system. Originality/value - This paper showcases several features used in HIVE system. By using traditional consistency measures to evaluate a semantic web technology, this paper emphasizes the link between traditional indexing and next generation machine-aided indexing (MAI) tools.

Ansari, M.: Matching between assigned descriptors and title keywords in medical theses (2005) 0.01

0.0063142553 = product of:
  0.031571276 = sum of:
    0.031571276 = weight(_text_:7 in 4739) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.031571276 = score(doc=4739,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.17251469 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.3127685 = idf(docFreq=4376, maxDocs=44218)
          0.052075688 = queryNorm
        0.18300632 = fieldWeight in 4739, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.3127685 = idf(docFreq=4376, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4739)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)

Source: Library review. 54(2005) no.7, S.410-414

Lu, K.; Mao, J.; Li, G.: Toward effective automated weighted subject indexing : a comparison of different approaches in different environments (2018) 0.01

0.0063142553 = product of:
  0.031571276 = sum of:
    0.031571276 = weight(_text_:7 in 4292) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.031571276 = score(doc=4292,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.17251469 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.3127685 = idf(docFreq=4376, maxDocs=44218)
          0.052075688 = queryNorm
        0.18300632 = fieldWeight in 4292, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.3127685 = idf(docFreq=4376, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4292)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)

Footnote: Vgl. das Erratum in JASIST 69(2018) no.7, S.956.

Bade, D.: ¬The creation and persistence of misinformation in shared library catalogs : language and subject knowledge in a technological era (2002) 0.00

0.0028222147 = product of:
  0.014111074 = sum of:
    0.014111074 = weight(_text_:22 in 1858) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.014111074 = score(doc=1858,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.18236019 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.052075688 = queryNorm
        0.07738023 = fieldWeight in 1858, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.015625 = fieldNorm(doc=1858)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)

Date: 22. 9.1997 19:16:05

Search (16 results, page 1 of 1)

Authors

Years

Types

Themes