Search (45 results, page 1 of 3)

  • × theme_ss:"Benutzerstudien"
  1. Salaba, A.: End-user understanding of indexing language information (2009) 0.03
    0.032826282 = product of:
      0.065652564 = sum of:
        0.065652564 = product of:
          0.13130513 = sum of:
            0.13130513 = weight(_text_:indexing in 2974) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.13130513 = score(doc=2974,freq=10.0), product of:
                0.19835205 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051817898 = queryNorm
                0.6619802 = fieldWeight in 2974, product of:
                  3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                    10.0 = termFreq=10.0
                  3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2974)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    This study examines end-user interactions with indexing language information during subject searching in a library catalog and their understanding of this information and its function in term selection. Participants were asked to interact with the indexing language (Library of Congress Subject Headings) and were asked to express their general understanding of the information provided and each specific type of information included in the indexing language. In addition, participants were asked to express their understanding of the function of indexing language information in term selection, its usefulness and desirability as an integrated tool into the information retrieval system during subject searching. Study findings and their implications are discussed and future research is considered.
  2. Ennis, M.; Sutcliffe, A.G.; Watkinson, S.J.: Towards a predictive model of information seeking : empirical studies of end-user-searching (1999) 0.03
    0.030818773 = product of:
      0.061637547 = sum of:
        0.061637547 = sum of:
          0.03355511 = weight(_text_:indexing in 296) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.03355511 = score(doc=296,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.19835205 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051817898 = queryNorm
              0.16916946 = fieldWeight in 296, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=296)
          0.028082438 = weight(_text_:22 in 296) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.028082438 = score(doc=296,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18145745 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051817898 = queryNorm
              0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 296, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=296)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Previous empirical studies of searcher behaviour have drawn attention to a wide variety of factors that affect performance; for instance, the display of retrieved results can alter search strategies (Allen 1991, 1994), the information need type influences search behaviour, (Elkerton et al 1984, Marchionini 1995); while the task complexity, reflected in the information need can affect user's search behaviour (Large et al 1994). Furthermore, information source selection (Bassilli 1977), and the user's model of the system and domain impact on the search process (Michel 1994); while motivation (Solomon 1993, Jacobsen et al 1992) and the importance of the information need (Wendt 1969) also influence search duration and the effort a user will employ. Rouse and Rouse (1984) in a review of empirical studies, summarise a wide variety of variables that can effect searching behaviour, including payoff, costs of searching, resource available, amount of information sought, characteristics of the data and conflicts between documents. It appears that user behaviour is inconsistent in the search strategies adopted even for the same search need and system (Davidson 1977, Iivonen 1995). Theories of searcher behaviour have been proposed that provide explanations of aspects of end-user behaviour, such as the evolution of the user's information need and the problems of articulating a query, [Bates (1979, 1989), Markey and Atherton 1978], effective search strategies in browsing and goal directed searches [Marchionini 1995, Belkin (1987, 1993)], the linguistic problem of matching search terms with indexing terms or content of target documents through an expert intermediary (Ingwersen 1982) or cognitive aspects of IR (Kulthau 1984, Ingwersen 1996).
    Date
    22. 3.2002 9:54:13
  3. Crawford, J.C.; Thorn, L.C.; Powles, J.A.: ¬A survey of subject access to academic library catalogues in Great Britain : a report to the British Library Research and Development Department (1992) 0.03
    0.025427131 = product of:
      0.050854262 = sum of:
        0.050854262 = product of:
          0.101708524 = sum of:
            0.101708524 = weight(_text_:indexing in 367) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.101708524 = score(doc=367,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.19835205 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051817898 = queryNorm
                0.5127677 = fieldWeight in 367, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=367)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    The study of subject access to UK academic library catalogues was based on a questionnaires end out during Summer 1991. 86 out of a possible 110 questionnaires were returned. All universities and polytechniques now have OPACs which are progressing well towards comprehensive bibliographical coverage of their libraries' stocks. The MARC format is now widely used. Subject access strategies are usually based on either Library of Congress Subject Headings or inhouse indexing systems but almost half the OPACs studies have no separate subject searching option based on subject indexing is expensive and future subject indexing strategies are best based on pre-existing controlled vocabularies. Strategies authority control is essential. A limited range of software strategies is recommended including the need to limit search results
  4. Scholle, U.: Kann ich Ihnen behilflich sein? : Erhebung am zentralen Auskunftsplatz der ULB Münster (2000) 0.02
    0.024572134 = product of:
      0.049144268 = sum of:
        0.049144268 = product of:
          0.098288536 = sum of:
            0.098288536 = weight(_text_:22 in 7585) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.098288536 = score(doc=7585,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18145745 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051817898 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 7585, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=7585)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 1.2000 17:52:11
  5. Branch, J.L.: Investigating the information-seeking process of adolescents : the value of using think alouds and think afters (2000) 0.02
    0.024572134 = product of:
      0.049144268 = sum of:
        0.049144268 = product of:
          0.098288536 = sum of:
            0.098288536 = weight(_text_:22 in 3924) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.098288536 = score(doc=3924,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18145745 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051817898 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 3924, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3924)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Library and information science research. 22(2000) no.4, S.371-382
  6. Yoo, E.-Y.; Robbins, L.S.: Understanding middle-aged women's health information seeking on the web : a theoretical approach (2008) 0.02
    0.021061828 = product of:
      0.042123657 = sum of:
        0.042123657 = product of:
          0.08424731 = sum of:
            0.08424731 = weight(_text_:22 in 2973) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08424731 = score(doc=2973,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18145745 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051817898 = queryNorm
                0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 2973, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2973)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    9. 2.2008 17:52:22
  7. Hancock-Beaulieu, M.: ¬A comparative transaction log analysis of browsing and search formulation in online catalogues (1993) 0.01
    0.01468036 = product of:
      0.02936072 = sum of:
        0.02936072 = product of:
          0.05872144 = sum of:
            0.05872144 = weight(_text_:indexing in 5258) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.05872144 = score(doc=5258,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.19835205 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051817898 = queryNorm
                0.29604656 = fieldWeight in 5258, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5258)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    OLIVE, a transaction logging facility enhanced with online questionnaires, was used to collect data from users of public and academic library catalogues. The comparative analysis of subject searching behaviour focused on the role of browsing subject headings and brief references in search formulation. Opportunities for browsing are greatly constrained by indexing practices. It is suggested that a more integrated approach to pre-coordinate and post-coordinate searching would be more effective. The logging software has been developed for a number of commercial online catalogues including Geac, CLSI and LIBERTAS. The use of a diagnostic and monitoring tool in the evaluation of OPACs is advocated
  8. Wallace, P.M.: Periodical title searching in online catalogues (1997) 0.01
    0.014041219 = product of:
      0.028082438 = sum of:
        0.028082438 = product of:
          0.056164876 = sum of:
            0.056164876 = weight(_text_:22 in 1628) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.056164876 = score(doc=1628,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18145745 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051817898 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1628, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1628)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    29. 7.1998 10:57:22
  9. Tomney, H.; Burton, P.F.: Electronic journals : a case study of usage and attitudes among academics (1998) 0.01
    0.014041219 = product of:
      0.028082438 = sum of:
        0.028082438 = product of:
          0.056164876 = sum of:
            0.056164876 = weight(_text_:22 in 3687) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.056164876 = score(doc=3687,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18145745 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051817898 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3687, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3687)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 5.1999 19:07:29
  10. Gremett, P.: Utilizing a user's context to improve search results (2006) 0.01
    0.014041219 = product of:
      0.028082438 = sum of:
        0.028082438 = product of:
          0.056164876 = sum of:
            0.056164876 = weight(_text_:22 in 5299) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.056164876 = score(doc=5299,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18145745 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051817898 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 5299, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5299)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 7.2006 18:17:44
  11. Schneider, R.: OPACs, Benutzer und das Web (2009) 0.01
    0.014041219 = product of:
      0.028082438 = sum of:
        0.028082438 = product of:
          0.056164876 = sum of:
            0.056164876 = weight(_text_:22 in 2905) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.056164876 = score(doc=2905,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18145745 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051817898 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2905, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2905)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 2.2009 18:50:43
  12. Collantes, L.Y.: Degree of agreement in naming objects and concepts for information retrieval (1995) 0.01
    0.012583166 = product of:
      0.025166333 = sum of:
        0.025166333 = product of:
          0.050332665 = sum of:
            0.050332665 = weight(_text_:indexing in 636) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.050332665 = score(doc=636,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.19835205 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051817898 = queryNorm
                0.2537542 = fieldWeight in 636, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=636)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    The research described in this article extends work done on human behavior in naming concepts and objects by adapting a methodology developed at Bell Labs and applying it to a library indexing language, the Library of Congress Subject Headings. The study investigated the representation of users' knowledge (names of objects and concepts), database representation for similar objects and concepts, and degree of agreement among users and between users and information systems. Three user groups give names to 40 stumuli. Names generated were compared with each other and with LCSH. Degree of agreement was calculated using similarity measures. The analyses identified patterns of agreement and variability in naming. There was little agreement in the names people use and the names recommended for use by LC, implying that retrieval systems should do more to accomodate common naming behavior
  13. Andersson, R.; Holst, E.: Indexes and other depictions of fictions : a new model for analysis empirically tested (1996) 0.01
    0.012583166 = product of:
      0.025166333 = sum of:
        0.025166333 = product of:
          0.050332665 = sum of:
            0.050332665 = weight(_text_:indexing in 473) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.050332665 = score(doc=473,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.19835205 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051817898 = queryNorm
                0.2537542 = fieldWeight in 473, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=473)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    In this study descriptions of a novel by 100 users at 2 Swedish public libraries, Malmö and Molndal, Mar-Apr 95, were compared to the index terms used for the novels at these libraries. Describes previous systems for fiction indexing, the 2 libraries, and the users interviewed. Compares the AMP system with their own model. The latter operates with terms under the headings phenomena, frame and author's intention. The similarities between the users' and indexers' descriptions were sufficiently close to make it possible to retrieve fiction in accordance with users' wishes in Molndal, and would have been in Malmö, had more books been indexed with more terms. Sometimes the similarities were close enough for users to retrieve fiction on their own
  14. Yee, M.M.: System design and cataloging meet the user : user interfaces to online public access catalogs (1991) 0.01
    0.012583166 = product of:
      0.025166333 = sum of:
        0.025166333 = product of:
          0.050332665 = sum of:
            0.050332665 = weight(_text_:indexing in 2782) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.050332665 = score(doc=2782,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.19835205 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051817898 = queryNorm
                0.2537542 = fieldWeight in 2782, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2782)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Current research on user interfaces to online public access catalogs is reviewed in an attempt to identify research methods and findings applicable to the design of effective user interfaces to online public access catalogs. A broad definition of user interface is employed which includes data structures, in addition to searching and indexing software. The following features of online public access catalogs are discussed: the demonstration of relationships between records, the provision of entry vocabularies, the arrangement of multiple entries on the screen, the provision of access points, the display of single records, and the division of the catalog into separate files or indexes. For each feature, user studies and other research on online public access catalogs are reviewed and those findings summarized which provide insight into user needs concerning that particular feature; issues are identified and directions for further research are suggested. Implications for cataloging codes and standards and system design are discussed
  15. Kaske, N.K.: ¬A comparative study of subject searching in an OPAC among branch libraries of a university library system (1988) 0.01
    0.012286067 = product of:
      0.024572134 = sum of:
        0.024572134 = product of:
          0.049144268 = sum of:
            0.049144268 = weight(_text_:22 in 760) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.049144268 = score(doc=760,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18145745 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051817898 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 760, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=760)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    The degree of variability in the percentage of subject searching in an online public access catalog (OPAC) among branch libraries of one university was studied. A full semester's worth of transactions was analyzed, not sampled. The time units used were hour of the day, day of the week, and week of the semester. The findings show that subject searching varies from a low of 22% to a high of 74% over the hours of a day. Variability for the days of the week ranged from 17% to 64%, and for the weeks of the semester variability ranged from 12% to 70%. Valuable management information on the utilization of the OPAC within each brach library and among all the branch libraries is provided through numerous charts and graphs.
  16. Witt, M.: Survey on the use of the catalogue at the Mediatheque of the Cité des Sciences et de l'Industrie (CSI) (1993) 0.01
    0.012286067 = product of:
      0.024572134 = sum of:
        0.024572134 = product of:
          0.049144268 = sum of:
            0.049144268 = weight(_text_:22 in 7914) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.049144268 = score(doc=7914,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18145745 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051817898 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 7914, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=7914)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    International cataloguing and bibliographic control. 22(1993) no.4, S.68-71
  17. Meadow, C.T.: Speculations on the measurement and use of user characteristics in information retrieval experimentation (1994) 0.01
    0.012286067 = product of:
      0.024572134 = sum of:
        0.024572134 = product of:
          0.049144268 = sum of:
            0.049144268 = weight(_text_:22 in 1795) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.049144268 = score(doc=1795,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18145745 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051817898 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 1795, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1795)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Canadian journal of information and library science. 19(1994) no.4, S.1-22
  18. Berger, F.C.; Hofstede, A.H.M. ter; Van der Weide, T.P.: Supporting query by navigation (1996) 0.01
    0.012286067 = product of:
      0.024572134 = sum of:
        0.024572134 = product of:
          0.049144268 = sum of:
            0.049144268 = weight(_text_:22 in 6966) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.049144268 = score(doc=6966,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18145745 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051817898 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 6966, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6966)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Information retrieval: new systems and current research. Proceedings of the 16th Research Colloquium of the British Computer Society Information Retrieval Specialist Group, Drymen, Scotland, 22-23 Mar 94. Ed.: R. Leon
  19. Stokmans, M.; Oomens, A.: Meer grasduinen door genreplaatsing? : genre- of alfabetische plaatsing: onderzoek naar verschillen in gebruikersgedrag (1997) 0.01
    0.012286067 = product of:
      0.024572134 = sum of:
        0.024572134 = product of:
          0.049144268 = sum of:
            0.049144268 = weight(_text_:22 in 883) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.049144268 = score(doc=883,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18145745 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051817898 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 883, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=883)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    BibliotheekBlad. 1(1997) no.21, S.22-23
  20. Moulaison, H.L.: OPAC queries at a medium-sized academic library : a transaction log analysis (2008) 0.01
    0.012286067 = product of:
      0.024572134 = sum of:
        0.024572134 = product of:
          0.049144268 = sum of:
            0.049144268 = weight(_text_:22 in 3599) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.049144268 = score(doc=3599,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18145745 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051817898 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 3599, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3599)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22

Years

Languages

  • e 42
  • d 2
  • nl 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 44
  • b 1
  • r 1
  • More… Less…