Search (22 results, page 1 of 2)

  • × type_ss:"r"
  1. Hartley, J.; Sydes, M.: Structured abstracts in the social sciences : presentation, readability and recall (1995) 0.08
    0.08205604 = product of:
      0.16411208 = sum of:
        0.16411208 = product of:
          0.32822415 = sum of:
            0.32822415 = weight(_text_:abstracts in 2383) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.32822415 = score(doc=2383,freq=18.0), product of:
                0.2890173 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.7104354 = idf(docFreq=397, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05061213 = queryNorm
                1.1356558 = fieldWeight in 2383, product of:
                  4.2426405 = tf(freq=18.0), with freq of:
                    18.0 = termFreq=18.0
                  5.7104354 = idf(docFreq=397, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2383)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Reports results of a study to explore the possibilities of extending the use of structured abstracts (which use subheadings such as background, aims, participants method, results, conclusions) of the type often found in biomedical periodicals; to test whether or not such structured abstracts are more easily searched, comprehended and recalled than abstracts set in the traditional manner; and to examine readers' preferences for different typographic settings for structured abstracts. Results indicated: that it is possible to produce structured abstracts for periodical articles in the social sciences; and that such abstracts may be easier to read, search and recall than abstracts presented in the traditional manner. Suggests that abstracts use 6 subheadings (background, aims, method, results, conclusions, and, optionally, comment) and recommends that these subheadings are conveyed in bold capital letters and, ideally, set apart from the main text by printer's rules
  2. McIntosh, N.: Structured abstracts and information transfer (1994) 0.07
    0.07236663 = product of:
      0.14473327 = sum of:
        0.14473327 = product of:
          0.28946653 = sum of:
            0.28946653 = weight(_text_:abstracts in 728) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.28946653 = score(doc=728,freq=14.0), product of:
                0.2890173 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.7104354 = idf(docFreq=397, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05061213 = queryNorm
                1.0015544 = fieldWeight in 728, product of:
                  3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
                    14.0 = termFreq=14.0
                  5.7104354 = idf(docFreq=397, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=728)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Reports results of a study, conducted by the European Society of Paediatric Research (ESPR), to determine whether the information content of structured medical abstracts is greater than abstracts with traditional format and whether the efficacy of peer review is improved by the use of structured medical abstracts. The sample studied comprised the abstracts of papers submitted for the ESPR annual meeting and each abstract was assessed by a research worker by a research worker for information content by referring to a list of criteria. The words in each abstract were counted to obtain the information density of each and the abstracts were evaluated according to whether they were in an unstructured format, a semistructured format, or a more fully structured format. Although there was no significant difference in the scientific score of the scientific information density of the different formats there was significantly more information in the fully structured format. When the abstracts were resubmitted in structured format, there was always a highly significant increase in the information content
  3. Paice, C.D.: Automatic abstracting (1994) 0.05
    0.045586694 = product of:
      0.09117339 = sum of:
        0.09117339 = product of:
          0.18234678 = sum of:
            0.18234678 = weight(_text_:abstracts in 917) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.18234678 = score(doc=917,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.2890173 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.7104354 = idf(docFreq=397, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05061213 = queryNorm
                0.63091993 = fieldWeight in 917, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  5.7104354 = idf(docFreq=397, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=917)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    The final report of the 2nd British Library abstracting project (the BLAB project), 1990-1992, which was carried out partly at the Computing Department of Lancaster University, and partly at the Centre for Computational Linguistics, UMIST. This project built on the results of the first project, of 1985-1987, to build a system designed create abstracts automatically from given texts
  4. Armstrong, C.J.; Medawar, K.: Investigation into the quality of databases in general use in the UK (1996) 0.03
    0.031910684 = product of:
      0.06382137 = sum of:
        0.06382137 = product of:
          0.12764274 = sum of:
            0.12764274 = weight(_text_:abstracts in 6768) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.12764274 = score(doc=6768,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.2890173 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.7104354 = idf(docFreq=397, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05061213 = queryNorm
                0.44164395 = fieldWeight in 6768, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  5.7104354 = idf(docFreq=397, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6768)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Reports on a Centre for Information Quality Management (CIQM) BLRRD funded project which investigated the quality of databases in general use in the UK. Gives a literature review of quality in library and information services. Reports the results of a CIQM questionnaire survey on the quality problems of databases and their affect on users. Carries out databases evaluations of: INSPEC on ESA-IRS, INSPEC on KR Data-Star, INSPEC on UMI CD-ROM, BNB on CD-ROM, and Information Science Abstracts Plus CD-ROM. Sets out a methodology for evaluation of bibliographic databases
  5. Modelle und Konzepte der Beitragsdokumentation und Filmarchivierung im Lokalfernsehsender Hamburg I : Endbericht (1996) 0.03
    0.027428979 = product of:
      0.054857958 = sum of:
        0.054857958 = product of:
          0.109715916 = sum of:
            0.109715916 = weight(_text_:22 in 7383) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.109715916 = score(doc=7383,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17723505 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05061213 = queryNorm
                0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 7383, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=7383)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 2.1997 19:46:30
  6. Wheelbarger, J.J.; Clouse, R.W.: ¬A comparision of a manual library reclassification project with a computer automated library reclassification project (1975) 0.02
    0.024000356 = product of:
      0.048000712 = sum of:
        0.048000712 = product of:
          0.096001424 = sum of:
            0.096001424 = weight(_text_:22 in 3473) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.096001424 = score(doc=3473,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17723505 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05061213 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 3473, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3473)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Pages
    22 S
  7. Matthews, J.R.; Parker, M.R.: Local Area Networks and Wide Area Networks for libraries (1995) 0.02
    0.024000356 = product of:
      0.048000712 = sum of:
        0.048000712 = product of:
          0.096001424 = sum of:
            0.096001424 = weight(_text_:22 in 2656) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.096001424 = score(doc=2656,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17723505 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05061213 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 2656, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=2656)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    30.11.1995 20:53:22
  8. Information for a new age : redefining the librarian (1995) 0.02
    0.020571733 = product of:
      0.041143466 = sum of:
        0.041143466 = product of:
          0.08228693 = sum of:
            0.08228693 = weight(_text_:22 in 2538) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08228693 = score(doc=2538,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17723505 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05061213 = queryNorm
                0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 2538, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2538)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Footnote
    Rez. in: Journal of academic librarianship 22(1996) no.2, S.147 (A. Schultis)
  9. Cleverdon, C.W.: ASLIB Cranfield Research Project : Report on the first stage of an investigation into the comparative efficiency of indexing systems (1960) 0.02
    0.020571733 = product of:
      0.041143466 = sum of:
        0.041143466 = product of:
          0.08228693 = sum of:
            0.08228693 = weight(_text_:22 in 6158) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08228693 = score(doc=6158,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17723505 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05061213 = queryNorm
                0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 6158, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6158)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Footnote
    Rez. in: College and research libraries 22(1961) no.3, S.228 (G. Jahoda)
  10. ¬The future of national bibliography (1997) 0.02
    0.020571733 = product of:
      0.041143466 = sum of:
        0.041143466 = product of:
          0.08228693 = sum of:
            0.08228693 = weight(_text_:22 in 1715) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08228693 = score(doc=1715,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17723505 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05061213 = queryNorm
                0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 1715, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1715)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Footnote
    Rez. in: Select newsletter 1998, no.22, S.8 (P. Robinson)
  11. Carey, K.; Stringer, R.: ¬The power of nine : a preliminary investigation into navigation strategies for the new library with special reference to disabled people (2000) 0.02
    0.020571733 = product of:
      0.041143466 = sum of:
        0.041143466 = product of:
          0.08228693 = sum of:
            0.08228693 = weight(_text_:22 in 234) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08228693 = score(doc=234,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17723505 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05061213 = queryNorm
                0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 234, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=234)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Pages
    22 S
  12. Intellectual property and the National Information Infrastructure : a preliminary draft of the report of the Working Group on Intellectual Property Rights (1994) 0.02
    0.017143112 = product of:
      0.034286223 = sum of:
        0.034286223 = product of:
          0.06857245 = sum of:
            0.06857245 = weight(_text_:22 in 7306) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06857245 = score(doc=7306,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17723505 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05061213 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 7306, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=7306)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 7.1996 19:53:48
  13. Drewer, P.; Massion, F; Pulitano, D: Was haben Wissensmodellierung, Wissensstrukturierung, künstliche Intelligenz und Terminologie miteinander zu tun? (2017) 0.02
    0.017143112 = product of:
      0.034286223 = sum of:
        0.034286223 = product of:
          0.06857245 = sum of:
            0.06857245 = weight(_text_:22 in 5576) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06857245 = score(doc=5576,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17723505 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05061213 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 5576, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5576)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    13.12.2017 14:17:22
  14. ALA / Subcommittee on Subject Relationships/Reference Structures: Final Report to the ALCTS/CCS Subject Analysis Committee (1997) 0.02
    0.015955342 = product of:
      0.031910684 = sum of:
        0.031910684 = product of:
          0.06382137 = sum of:
            0.06382137 = weight(_text_:abstracts in 1800) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06382137 = score(doc=1800,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.2890173 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.7104354 = idf(docFreq=397, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05061213 = queryNorm
                0.22082198 = fieldWeight in 1800, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  5.7104354 = idf(docFreq=397, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=1800)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Content
    Enthält: Appendix A: Subcommittee on Subject Relationships/Reference Structures - REPORT TO THE ALCTS/CCS SUBJECT ANALYSIS COMMITTEE - July 1996 Appendix B (part 1): Taxonomy of Subject Relationships. Compiled by Dee Michel with the assistance of Pat Kuhr - June 1996 draft (alphabetical display) (Separat in: http://web2.ala.org/ala/alctscontent/CCS/committees/subjectanalysis/subjectrelations/msrscu2.pdf) Appendix B (part 2): Taxonomy of Subject Relationships. Compiled by Dee Michel with the assistance of Pat Kuhr - June 1996 draft (hierarchical display) Appendix C: Checklist of Candidate Subject Relationships for Information Retrieval. Compiled by Dee Michel, Pat Kuhr, and Jane Greenberg; edited by Greg Wool - June 1997 Appendix D: Review of Reference Displays in Selected CD-ROM Abstracts and Indexes by Harriette Hemmasi and Steven Riel Appendix E: Analysis of Relationships in Six LC Subject Authority Records by Harriette Hemmasi and Gary Strawn Appendix F: Report of a Preliminary Survey of Subject Referencing in OPACs by Gregory Wool Appendix G: LC Subject Referencing in OPACs--Why Bother? by Gregory Wool Appendix H: Research Needs on Subject Relationships and Reference Structures in Information Access compiled by Jane Greenberg and Steven Riel with contributions from Dee Michel and others edited by Gregory Wool Appendix I: Bibliography on Subject Relationships compiled mostly by Dee Michel with additional contributions from Jane Greenberg, Steven Riel, and Gregory Wool
  15. Tober, M.; Hennig, L.; Furch, D.: SEO Ranking-Faktoren und Rang-Korrelationen 2014 : Google Deutschland (2014) 0.01
    0.0137144895 = product of:
      0.027428979 = sum of:
        0.027428979 = product of:
          0.054857958 = sum of:
            0.054857958 = weight(_text_:22 in 1484) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.054857958 = score(doc=1484,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17723505 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05061213 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1484, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1484)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    13. 9.2014 14:45:22
  16. Deokattey, S.; Sharma, S.B.K.; Kumar, G.R.; Bhanumurthy, K.: Knowledge organization research : an overview (2015) 0.01
    0.012000178 = product of:
      0.024000356 = sum of:
        0.024000356 = product of:
          0.048000712 = sum of:
            0.048000712 = weight(_text_:22 in 2092) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.048000712 = score(doc=2092,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17723505 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05061213 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2092, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2092)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 6.2015 16:13:38
  17. ELINOR : Electronic Library Project (1998) 0.01
    0.010285866 = product of:
      0.020571733 = sum of:
        0.020571733 = product of:
          0.041143466 = sum of:
            0.041143466 = weight(_text_:22 in 1404) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.041143466 = score(doc=1404,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17723505 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05061213 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1404, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1404)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Series
    British Library Research and Innovation Centre (BLRIC) report; 22
  18. McCormick, A.; Sutton, A.: Open learning and the Internet in public libraries (1998) 0.01
    0.010285866 = product of:
      0.020571733 = sum of:
        0.020571733 = product of:
          0.041143466 = sum of:
            0.041143466 = weight(_text_:22 in 3685) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.041143466 = score(doc=3685,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17723505 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05061213 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3685, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3685)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 5.1999 18:55:19
  19. Positionspapier zur Weiterentwicklung der Bibliotheksverbünde als Teil einer überregionalen Informationsinfrastruktur (2011) 0.01
    0.008571556 = product of:
      0.017143112 = sum of:
        0.017143112 = product of:
          0.034286223 = sum of:
            0.034286223 = weight(_text_:22 in 4291) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.034286223 = score(doc=4291,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17723505 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05061213 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 4291, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4291)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    7. 2.2011 19:52:22
  20. Förderung von Informationsinfrastrukturen für die Wissenschaft : Ein Positionspapier der Deutschen Forschungsgemeinschaft (2018) 0.01
    0.008571556 = product of:
      0.017143112 = sum of:
        0.017143112 = product of:
          0.034286223 = sum of:
            0.034286223 = weight(_text_:22 in 4178) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.034286223 = score(doc=4178,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17723505 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05061213 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 4178, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4178)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 3.2018 17:30:43