-
Dillon, M.; Jul, E.: Cataloging Internet resources : the convergence of libraries and Internet resources (1996)
0.11
0.106715195 = product of:
0.14228693 = sum of:
0.00823978 = product of:
0.03295912 = sum of:
0.03295912 = weight(_text_:based in 6737) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03295912 = score(doc=6737,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14144066 = queryWeight, product of:
3.0129938 = idf(docFreq=5906, maxDocs=44218)
0.04694356 = queryNorm
0.23302436 = fieldWeight in 6737, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.0129938 = idf(docFreq=5906, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6737)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.11178643 = weight(_text_:term in 6737) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.11178643 = score(doc=6737,freq=4.0), product of:
0.21904005 = queryWeight, product of:
4.66603 = idf(docFreq=1130, maxDocs=44218)
0.04694356 = queryNorm
0.510347 = fieldWeight in 6737, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
4.66603 = idf(docFreq=1130, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6737)
0.022260714 = product of:
0.04452143 = sum of:
0.04452143 = weight(_text_:22 in 6737) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04452143 = score(doc=6737,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16438834 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04694356 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 6737, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6737)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.75 = coord(3/4)
- Abstract
- Reviews issues related to the cataloguing of Internet resources and considers short term and long term directions for cataloguing and the gereal provision of library services for remotely accessible, electronic information resources. Discusses the strengths and weaknesses of using a library catalogue model to improve access to Internet resources. Based on experience gained through 2 OCLC Internet cataloguing projects, recommends continued application of library cataloguing standard and methods for Internet resources with the expectation that catalogues, cataloguing and libraries in general will continue to evolve. Points to problems inherent in the MARC field 856
- Series
- Cataloging and classification quarterly; vol.22, nos.3/4
-
Yee, M.M.: What is a work? : part 1: the user and the objects of the catalog (1994)
0.08
0.08215908 = product of:
0.10954544 = sum of:
0.00823978 = product of:
0.03295912 = sum of:
0.03295912 = weight(_text_:based in 735) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03295912 = score(doc=735,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14144066 = queryWeight, product of:
3.0129938 = idf(docFreq=5906, maxDocs=44218)
0.04694356 = queryNorm
0.23302436 = fieldWeight in 735, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.0129938 = idf(docFreq=5906, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=735)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.079044946 = weight(_text_:term in 735) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.079044946 = score(doc=735,freq=2.0), product of:
0.21904005 = queryWeight, product of:
4.66603 = idf(docFreq=1130, maxDocs=44218)
0.04694356 = queryNorm
0.36086982 = fieldWeight in 735, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.66603 = idf(docFreq=1130, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=735)
0.022260714 = product of:
0.04452143 = sum of:
0.04452143 = weight(_text_:22 in 735) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04452143 = score(doc=735,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16438834 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04694356 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 735, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=735)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.75 = coord(3/4)
- Abstract
- Part 1 of a series of articles, exploring the concept of 'the work' in cataloguing practice, which attempts to construct a definition of the term based on AACR theory and practice. The study begins with a consideration of the objects of the catalogue, their history and the evidence that bears on the question of the degree to which the user needs access to the work, as opposed to a particular edition of the work
- Footnote
- Vgl. auch: Pt.2: Cataloging and classification quarterly. 19(1994) no.2, S.5-22; Pt.3: Cataloging and classification quarterly. 20(1995) no.1, S.25-46; Pt.4: Cataloging and classification quarterly. 20(1995) no.2, S.3-24
-
Dillon, M.; Jul, E.: Cataloging Internet resources : the convergence of libraries and Internet resources (1996)
0.08
0.08215908 = product of:
0.10954544 = sum of:
0.00823978 = product of:
0.03295912 = sum of:
0.03295912 = weight(_text_:based in 602) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03295912 = score(doc=602,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14144066 = queryWeight, product of:
3.0129938 = idf(docFreq=5906, maxDocs=44218)
0.04694356 = queryNorm
0.23302436 = fieldWeight in 602, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.0129938 = idf(docFreq=5906, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=602)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.079044946 = weight(_text_:term in 602) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.079044946 = score(doc=602,freq=2.0), product of:
0.21904005 = queryWeight, product of:
4.66603 = idf(docFreq=1130, maxDocs=44218)
0.04694356 = queryNorm
0.36086982 = fieldWeight in 602, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.66603 = idf(docFreq=1130, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=602)
0.022260714 = product of:
0.04452143 = sum of:
0.04452143 = weight(_text_:22 in 602) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04452143 = score(doc=602,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16438834 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04694356 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 602, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=602)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.75 = coord(3/4)
- Abstract
- This paper reviews issues related to the cataloging of Internet resources and considers shortand long-term directions for cataloging and the general provision of library services for remotely accessible, electronic information resources. The strengths and weakness of using a library catalog model to improve access to Internet resources are discussed and compared with a review of related efforts. Based on experience gained through two OCLC Internet cataloging projects, the authors recommend continued and vigorous appplication of library cataloging standards and methods for Internet resources with the expectation that catalogs, cataloging, and libraries in general will continue to evolve.
- Source
- Cataloging and classification quarterly. 22(1996) nos.3/4, S.197-238
-
Devaul, H.; Diekema, A.R.; Ostwald, J.: Computer-assisted assignment of educational standards using natural language processing (2011)
0.07
0.07004061 = product of:
0.14008123 = sum of:
0.0070626684 = product of:
0.028250674 = sum of:
0.028250674 = weight(_text_:based in 4199) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.028250674 = score(doc=4199,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14144066 = queryWeight, product of:
3.0129938 = idf(docFreq=5906, maxDocs=44218)
0.04694356 = queryNorm
0.19973516 = fieldWeight in 4199, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.0129938 = idf(docFreq=5906, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4199)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.13301855 = sum of:
0.094857335 = weight(_text_:assessment in 4199) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.094857335 = score(doc=4199,freq=2.0), product of:
0.25917634 = queryWeight, product of:
5.52102 = idf(docFreq=480, maxDocs=44218)
0.04694356 = queryNorm
0.36599535 = fieldWeight in 4199, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.52102 = idf(docFreq=480, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4199)
0.038161222 = weight(_text_:22 in 4199) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.038161222 = score(doc=4199,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16438834 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04694356 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4199, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4199)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- Educational standards are a central focus of the current educational system in the United States, underpinning educational practice, curriculum design, teacher professional development, and high-stakes testing and assessment. Digital library users have requested that this information be accessible in association with digital learning resources to support teaching and learning as well as accountability requirements. Providing this information is complex because of the variability and number of standards documents in use at the national, state, and local level. This article describes a cataloging tool that aids catalogers in the assignment of standards metadata to digital library resources, using natural language processing techniques. The research explores whether the standards suggestor service would suggest the same standards as a human, whether relevant standards are ranked appropriately in the result set, and whether the relevance of the suggested assignments improve when, in addition to resource content, metadata is included in the query to the cataloging tool. The article also discusses how this service might streamline the cataloging workflow.
- Date
- 22. 1.2011 14:25:32
- Theme
- Computer Based Training
-
O'Neill, E.; Zumer, M.; Mixter, J.: FRBR aggregates : their types and frequency in library collections (2015)
0.06
0.063497305 = product of:
0.12699461 = sum of:
0.107914 = weight(_text_:frequency in 2610) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.107914 = score(doc=2610,freq=2.0), product of:
0.27643865 = queryWeight, product of:
5.888745 = idf(docFreq=332, maxDocs=44218)
0.04694356 = queryNorm
0.39037234 = fieldWeight in 2610, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.888745 = idf(docFreq=332, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2610)
0.019080611 = product of:
0.038161222 = sum of:
0.038161222 = weight(_text_:22 in 2610) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.038161222 = score(doc=2610,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16438834 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04694356 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2610, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2610)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
-
Sheeran, R.: Maintaining the cohesive collection : the case for the local cataloger (1996)
0.06
0.057888947 = product of:
0.115777895 = sum of:
0.09033708 = weight(_text_:term in 489) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09033708 = score(doc=489,freq=2.0), product of:
0.21904005 = queryWeight, product of:
4.66603 = idf(docFreq=1130, maxDocs=44218)
0.04694356 = queryNorm
0.41242266 = fieldWeight in 489, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.66603 = idf(docFreq=1130, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=489)
0.025440816 = product of:
0.05088163 = sum of:
0.05088163 = weight(_text_:22 in 489) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05088163 = score(doc=489,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16438834 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04694356 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 489, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=489)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- The recent trend in reducing professional and training staff in cataloguing departments means that in the long term users will have to spend more time trying to retrieve the library's materials. Reasserts the importance of cataloguing. Discusses the importance of cataloguing to local control of the database, maintaining shelf order and subject control, cataloguing the Internet, database design and user training
- Source
- Journal of academic librarianship. 22(1996) no.6, S.462-465
-
Gorman, M.: Metadata or cataloguing? : a false choice (1999)
0.06
0.057888947 = product of:
0.115777895 = sum of:
0.09033708 = weight(_text_:term in 6095) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09033708 = score(doc=6095,freq=2.0), product of:
0.21904005 = queryWeight, product of:
4.66603 = idf(docFreq=1130, maxDocs=44218)
0.04694356 = queryNorm
0.41242266 = fieldWeight in 6095, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.66603 = idf(docFreq=1130, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6095)
0.025440816 = product of:
0.05088163 = sum of:
0.05088163 = weight(_text_:22 in 6095) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05088163 = score(doc=6095,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16438834 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04694356 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 6095, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6095)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- Libraries, their collections, and bibliographic control are essential components of the provision of access to recorded knowledge. Cataloging is a primary method of bibliographic control. Full or traditional cataloging is very expensive, but relying on keyword searching is inadequate. Alternatives for a solution to cataloging needs for electronic resources including the use of metadata and the Dublin Core are examined. Many questions exist regarding the long-term future of today's electronic documents. Recommendations are made for preserving recorded knowledge and information in the electronic resources for future generations
- Source
- Journal of Internet cataloging. 2(1999) no.1, S.5-22
-
Shin, H.-s.: Quality of Korean cataloging records in shared databases (2003)
0.06
0.057488333 = product of:
0.11497667 = sum of:
0.0070626684 = product of:
0.028250674 = sum of:
0.028250674 = weight(_text_:based in 5498) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.028250674 = score(doc=5498,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14144066 = queryWeight, product of:
3.0129938 = idf(docFreq=5906, maxDocs=44218)
0.04694356 = queryNorm
0.19973516 = fieldWeight in 5498, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.0129938 = idf(docFreq=5906, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5498)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.107914 = weight(_text_:frequency in 5498) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.107914 = score(doc=5498,freq=2.0), product of:
0.27643865 = queryWeight, product of:
5.888745 = idf(docFreq=332, maxDocs=44218)
0.04694356 = queryNorm
0.39037234 = fieldWeight in 5498, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.888745 = idf(docFreq=332, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5498)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- For decades, the issue of quality control in cataloging records has been discussed, in particular in bibliographic control in the shared databases for various languages, but no earlier studies assess the quality of Korean cataloging records in the databases. This study examines the quality of Korean cataloging records in OCLC's WorldCat by evaluating records in terms of specific errors, error frequency, areas where errors occur frequently, and errors that could inhibit record retrieval. The results of the current study also are compared with the results of the study of the quality of Chinese-language cataloging records in order to identify shared error patterns. Similarities were found in the error rates and error types. Based on the results, the author proposes some recommendations on how to maintain quality in cataloging Korean-language records.
-
Carrasco, R.C.; Serrano, A.; Castillo-Buergo, R.: ¬A parser for authority control of author names in bibliographic records (2016)
0.05
0.047906943 = product of:
0.095813885 = sum of:
0.005885557 = product of:
0.023542227 = sum of:
0.023542227 = weight(_text_:based in 3186) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.023542227 = score(doc=3186,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14144066 = queryWeight, product of:
3.0129938 = idf(docFreq=5906, maxDocs=44218)
0.04694356 = queryNorm
0.16644597 = fieldWeight in 3186, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.0129938 = idf(docFreq=5906, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3186)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.08992833 = weight(_text_:frequency in 3186) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08992833 = score(doc=3186,freq=2.0), product of:
0.27643865 = queryWeight, product of:
5.888745 = idf(docFreq=332, maxDocs=44218)
0.04694356 = queryNorm
0.32531026 = fieldWeight in 3186, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.888745 = idf(docFreq=332, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3186)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- Bibliographic collections in traditional libraries often compile records from distributed sources where variable criteria have been applied to the normalization of the data. Furthermore, the source records often follow classical standards, such as MARC21, where a strict normalization of author names is not enforced. The identification of equivalent records in large catalogues is therefore required, for example, when migrating the data to new repositories which apply modern specifications for cataloguing, such as the FRBR and RDA standards. An open-source tool has been implemented to assist authority control in bibliographic catalogues when external features (such as the citations found in scientific articles) are not available for the disambiguation of creator names. This tool is based on similarity measures between the variants of author names combined with a parser which interprets the dates and periods associated with the creator. An efficient data structure (the unigram frequency vector trie) has been used to accelerate the identification of variants. The algorithms employed and the attribute grammar are described in detail and their implementation is distributed as an open-source resource to allow for an easier uptake.
-
Doran, C.; Martin, C.: Measuring success in outsourced cataloging : a data-driven investigation (2017)
0.04
0.044512253 = product of:
0.17804901 = sum of:
0.17804901 = weight(_text_:frequency in 5150) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.17804901 = score(doc=5150,freq=4.0), product of:
0.27643865 = queryWeight, product of:
5.888745 = idf(docFreq=332, maxDocs=44218)
0.04694356 = queryNorm
0.6440815 = fieldWeight in 5150, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
5.888745 = idf(docFreq=332, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5150)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Abstract
- This article investigates the error rates in shelf-ready cataloged monographs from Ingram Coutts Information Services that were received at The University of Western Ontario. Using quality control reports from a period of two years, over 500 cataloging errors were entered into a database organized by frequency, severity, and other factors. With this information, we analyzed the frequency of errors and their root causes. We found that overall error rates are low, and the quality of shelf-ready cataloging has improved since first implementing the outsourcing program.
-
Daigle, L.; Daniel, R.; Preston, C.: Uniform Resource Identifiers and online serials (1998)
0.04
0.043642364 = product of:
0.08728473 = sum of:
0.00823978 = product of:
0.03295912 = sum of:
0.03295912 = weight(_text_:based in 2426) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03295912 = score(doc=2426,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14144066 = queryWeight, product of:
3.0129938 = idf(docFreq=5906, maxDocs=44218)
0.04694356 = queryNorm
0.23302436 = fieldWeight in 2426, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.0129938 = idf(docFreq=5906, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2426)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.079044946 = weight(_text_:term in 2426) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.079044946 = score(doc=2426,freq=2.0), product of:
0.21904005 = queryWeight, product of:
4.66603 = idf(docFreq=1130, maxDocs=44218)
0.04694356 = queryNorm
0.36086982 = fieldWeight in 2426, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.66603 = idf(docFreq=1130, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2426)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- Rights management and long term integrity of citations are just 2 of the issues which continue to impede the widespread adoption of the WWW as a method for publishing online serials. Discusses the history and purposes of Uniform Resource Identifiers (URIs) as well as the role identifiers will play in the deployment of online serials. Pays particular attention to development of Uniform Resource names (URNs), one of the goals of which is to use existing identifier systems, such as ISBNs, ISSNs, and SICIs. Describes URN syntax and resolution, then presents some illustrations of how WWW based publication of online serials might use different forms of URIs
-
Pil-Mo, J.; Dong-Geun, O.: On the processing of Kwan-ching in the title of East-Asian materials : from the Korean perspective (1990)
0.04
0.043642364 = product of:
0.08728473 = sum of:
0.00823978 = product of:
0.03295912 = sum of:
0.03295912 = weight(_text_:based in 498) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03295912 = score(doc=498,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14144066 = queryWeight, product of:
3.0129938 = idf(docFreq=5906, maxDocs=44218)
0.04694356 = queryNorm
0.23302436 = fieldWeight in 498, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.0129938 = idf(docFreq=5906, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=498)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.079044946 = weight(_text_:term in 498) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.079044946 = score(doc=498,freq=2.0), product of:
0.21904005 = queryWeight, product of:
4.66603 = idf(docFreq=1130, maxDocs=44218)
0.04694356 = queryNorm
0.36086982 = fieldWeight in 498, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.66603 = idf(docFreq=1130, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=498)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- Kwan-ching is a characteristic phenomenon frequently appearing in East-Asian materials. However, the cataloging rules in Korea, Japan, and Taiwan provide many differences for the treatment of Kwan-ching. Redefinition of the term Kwan-ching is suggested, and the processing of it in description, in headings, and in the MARC format is also investigated, based on the comparative analysis of the main cataloging rules. It is recommended that Kwan-ching be entered before the title proper in parenthesis, added entries be made both under the title including Kwan-ching and under those excluding it, and that attention be paid to the processing of Kwan-Ching in the MARC format.
-
Russell, B.M.: Looking for someone special : special collections cataloging, 1980-2000 and beyond (2003)
0.04
0.04341671 = product of:
0.08683342 = sum of:
0.06775281 = weight(_text_:term in 150) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06775281 = score(doc=150,freq=2.0), product of:
0.21904005 = queryWeight, product of:
4.66603 = idf(docFreq=1130, maxDocs=44218)
0.04694356 = queryNorm
0.309317 = fieldWeight in 150, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.66603 = idf(docFreq=1130, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=150)
0.019080611 = product of:
0.038161222 = sum of:
0.038161222 = weight(_text_:22 in 150) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.038161222 = score(doc=150,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16438834 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04694356 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 150, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=150)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- The provision of access to materials in special collections intersects the fields of cataloging and special collections librarianship, sharing characteristics and challenges with both. In order to reveal the changing expectations regarding special collections cataloging professionals, the author examined job notices for positions advertised in C&RL News from 1980 to 2000. Three related hypotheses were tested in this study: fixed-term appointments would become more common; published requirements for consideration would be more rigorous; and positions would offer less relative compensation than in the past. These hypotheses were demonstrated to be untrue. In a larger context, the results of this study can be extrapolated to suggest means of improving education and training for professionals in special collections cataloging, highlighting the skills and abilities future employing institutions will be seeking.
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
-
Carlyle, A.: Understanding FRBR as a conceptual model : FRBR and the bibliographic universe (2006)
0.04
0.04341671 = product of:
0.08683342 = sum of:
0.06775281 = weight(_text_:term in 1050) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06775281 = score(doc=1050,freq=2.0), product of:
0.21904005 = queryWeight, product of:
4.66603 = idf(docFreq=1130, maxDocs=44218)
0.04694356 = queryNorm
0.309317 = fieldWeight in 1050, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.66603 = idf(docFreq=1130, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1050)
0.019080611 = product of:
0.038161222 = sum of:
0.038161222 = weight(_text_:22 in 1050) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.038161222 = score(doc=1050,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16438834 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04694356 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1050, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1050)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records (FRBR) presents a complex conceptual model. Because of this, it is not easy for everyone to understand. The purpose of this paper is to make some of the more difficult aspects of the FRBR model, in particular the Croup 1 entities work, expression, manifestation, and item, easier to understand by placing FRBR in the context of what it is: a conceptual entity-relationship model. To this end, a definition of the term "model" is presented, a variety of types and junctions of models are introduced, conceptual models are discussed in detail, modeling an abstraction is explained, and different ways of interpreting FRBR are suggested. Various models used in the history of cataloging are introduced to place FRBR in the context of the historical development of document models.
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
-
Huthwaite, A.: AACR2 and its place in the digital world : near-term solutions and long-term direction (2000)
0.04
0.03992373 = product of:
0.15969492 = sum of:
0.15969492 = weight(_text_:term in 6806) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.15969492 = score(doc=6806,freq=4.0), product of:
0.21904005 = queryWeight, product of:
4.66603 = idf(docFreq=1130, maxDocs=44218)
0.04694356 = queryNorm
0.7290672 = fieldWeight in 6806, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
4.66603 = idf(docFreq=1130, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=6806)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
-
Striedieck, S.: Online catalog maintenance : the OOPS command in LIAS (1985)
0.04
0.03879708 = product of:
0.15518832 = sum of:
0.15518832 = sum of:
0.11066689 = weight(_text_:assessment in 366) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.11066689 = score(doc=366,freq=2.0), product of:
0.25917634 = queryWeight, product of:
5.52102 = idf(docFreq=480, maxDocs=44218)
0.04694356 = queryNorm
0.4269946 = fieldWeight in 366, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.52102 = idf(docFreq=480, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=366)
0.04452143 = weight(_text_:22 in 366) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04452143 = score(doc=366,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16438834 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04694356 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 366, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=366)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Abstract
- LIAS, the Pennsylvania State University's (Penn State) integrated interactive online system, provides for messaging by the user to inform library staff of errors found in bibliographic records. The message is sent by use of the OOPS command, and results in a printout which is used by processing staff for online catalog maintenance. This article describes LIAS, the use of the OOPS command, the processing of the resulting OOPS reports, an assessment of the effect of its use, and some speculation on the expansion of the LIAS message system for use in catalog maintenance.
- Date
- 7. 1.2007 13:22:30
-
Stalberg, E.; Cronin, C.: Assessing the cost and value of bibliographic control (2011)
0.04
0.03879708 = product of:
0.15518832 = sum of:
0.15518832 = sum of:
0.11066689 = weight(_text_:assessment in 2592) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.11066689 = score(doc=2592,freq=2.0), product of:
0.25917634 = queryWeight, product of:
5.52102 = idf(docFreq=480, maxDocs=44218)
0.04694356 = queryNorm
0.4269946 = fieldWeight in 2592, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.52102 = idf(docFreq=480, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2592)
0.04452143 = weight(_text_:22 in 2592) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04452143 = score(doc=2592,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16438834 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04694356 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2592, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2592)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Abstract
- In June 2009, the Association for Library Collections and Technical Services Heads of Technical Services in Large Research Libraries Interest Group established the Task Force on Cost/Value Assessment of Bibliographic Control to address recommendation 5.1.1.1 of On the Record: Report of the Library of Congress Working Group on the Future of Bibliographic Control, which focused on developing measures for costs, benefits, and value of bibliographic control. This paper outlines results of that task force's efforts to develop and articulate metrics for evaluating the cost and value of cataloging activities specifically, and offers some next steps that the community could take to further the profession's collective understanding of the costs and values associated with bibliographic control.
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
-
Mugridge, R.L.; Edmunds, J.: Batchloading MARC bibliographic records (2012)
0.04
0.03879708 = product of:
0.15518832 = sum of:
0.15518832 = sum of:
0.11066689 = weight(_text_:assessment in 2600) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.11066689 = score(doc=2600,freq=2.0), product of:
0.25917634 = queryWeight, product of:
5.52102 = idf(docFreq=480, maxDocs=44218)
0.04694356 = queryNorm
0.4269946 = fieldWeight in 2600, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.52102 = idf(docFreq=480, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2600)
0.04452143 = weight(_text_:22 in 2600) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04452143 = score(doc=2600,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16438834 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04694356 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2600, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2600)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Abstract
- Research libraries are using batchloading to provide access to many resources that they would otherwise be unable to catalog given the staff and other resources available. To explore how such libraries are managing their batchloading activities, the authors conducted a survey of the Association for Library Collections and Technical Services Directors of Large Research Libraries Interest Group member libraries. The survey addressed staffing, budgets, scope, workflow, management, quality standards, information technology support, collaborative efforts, and assessment of batchloading activities. The authors provide an analysis of the survey results along with suggestions for process improvements and future research.
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
-
Howarth, L.C.; Weihs, J.: AACR2R: dissemination and use in Canadian libraries (1994)
0.04
0.035971332 = product of:
0.14388533 = sum of:
0.14388533 = weight(_text_:frequency in 8171) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.14388533 = score(doc=8171,freq=2.0), product of:
0.27643865 = queryWeight, product of:
5.888745 = idf(docFreq=332, maxDocs=44218)
0.04694356 = queryNorm
0.5204964 = fieldWeight in 8171, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.888745 = idf(docFreq=332, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=8171)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Abstract
- Reports the results of a national survey of Canadian libraries to determine the pattern of use of AACR2. 1988 revision (AACR2R), cataloguing rules for different formats of library materials in various sizes and types of libraries. Questionnaires were used to explore: the nature and frequency of use of the code; the preferred publication formats for acquiring AACR2R; and the contribution of records to a bibliographic utility or network (in house or external) database. Describes and summarizes the results, providing a baseline profile of AACR2R users and usage
-
Barnett, J.B.: Use study of OCLC cataloging in the marine sciences (1989)
0.04
0.035971332 = product of:
0.14388533 = sum of:
0.14388533 = weight(_text_:frequency in 447) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.14388533 = score(doc=447,freq=2.0), product of:
0.27643865 = queryWeight, product of:
5.888745 = idf(docFreq=332, maxDocs=44218)
0.04694356 = queryNorm
0.5204964 = fieldWeight in 447, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.888745 = idf(docFreq=332, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=447)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Abstract
- The original cataloging records of a marine science library were examined to determine frequency of use. The present study, patterned after an earlier study of municipal reference materials, shows an overall use rate of 45%. Patterns of subsequent use of original cataloging records suggest cataloging priorities, and changes to records indicate areas for attention to database quality control.
