Search (29 results, page 1 of 2)

  • × theme_ss:"Informationsethik"
  1. Himma, K.E.: ¬The justification of intellectual property : contemporary philosophical disputes (2008) 0.03
    0.031786613 = product of:
      0.06357323 = sum of:
        0.00823978 = product of:
          0.03295912 = sum of:
            0.03295912 = weight(_text_:based in 1862) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03295912 = score(doc=1862,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14144066 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.0129938 = idf(docFreq=5906, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04694356 = queryNorm
                0.23302436 = fieldWeight in 1862, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.0129938 = idf(docFreq=5906, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1862)
          0.25 = coord(1/4)
        0.055333447 = product of:
          0.11066689 = sum of:
            0.11066689 = weight(_text_:assessment in 1862) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.11066689 = score(doc=1862,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.25917634 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.52102 = idf(docFreq=480, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04694356 = queryNorm
                0.4269946 = fieldWeight in 1862, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  5.52102 = idf(docFreq=480, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1862)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    Once taken for granted as morally legitimate, legal protection of intellectual property rights have come under fire in the last 30 years as new technologies have evolved and severed the link between expression of ideas and such traditional material-based media as books and magazines. These advances in digital technology have called attention to unique features of intellectual content that problematize intellectual property protection; any piece of intellectual content, for example, can be simultaneously appropriated by everyone in the world without thereby diminishing the supply of that content available to others. This essay provides an overview and assessment of the arguments and counterarguments on the issue of whether intellectual property should be legally protected.
  2. Himma, K.E.: Foundational issues in information ethics (2007) 0.01
    0.009880973 = product of:
      0.039523892 = sum of:
        0.039523892 = product of:
          0.079047784 = sum of:
            0.079047784 = weight(_text_:assessment in 2591) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.079047784 = score(doc=2591,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.25917634 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.52102 = idf(docFreq=480, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04694356 = queryNorm
                0.30499613 = fieldWeight in 2591, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  5.52102 = idf(docFreq=480, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2591)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    Purpose - Information ethics, as is well known, has emerged as an independent area of ethical and philosophical inquiry. There are a number of academic journals that are devoted entirely to the numerous ethical issues that arise in connection with the new information communication technologies; these issues include a host of intellectual property, information privacy, and security issues of concern to librarians and other information professionals. In addition, there are a number of major international conferences devoted to information ethics every year. It would hardly be overstating the matter to say that information ethics is as "hot" an area of theoretical inquiry as medical ethics. The purpose of this paper is to provide an overview on these and related issues. Design/methodology/approach - The paper presents a review of relevant information ethics literature together with the author's assessment of the arguments. Findings - There are issues that are more abstract and basic than the substantive issues with which most information ethics theorizing is concerned. These issues are thought to be "foundational" in the sense that we cannot fully succeed in giving an analysis of the concrete problems of information ethics (e.g. are legal intellectual property rights justifiably protected?) until these issues are adequately addressed. Originality/value - The paper offers a needed survey of foundational issues in information ethics.
  3. Rubel, A.; Castro, C.; Pham, A.: Algorithms and autonomy : the ethics of automated decision systems (2021) 0.01
    0.009880973 = product of:
      0.039523892 = sum of:
        0.039523892 = product of:
          0.079047784 = sum of:
            0.079047784 = weight(_text_:assessment in 671) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.079047784 = score(doc=671,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.25917634 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.52102 = idf(docFreq=480, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04694356 = queryNorm
                0.30499613 = fieldWeight in 671, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  5.52102 = idf(docFreq=480, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=671)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    Algorithms influence every facet of modern life: criminal justice, education, housing, entertainment, elections, social media, news feeds, work... the list goes on. Delegating important decisions to machines, however, gives rise to deep moral concerns about responsibility, transparency, freedom, fairness, and democracy. Algorithms and Autonomy connects these concerns to the core human value of autonomy in the contexts of algorithmic teacher evaluation, risk assessment in criminal sentencing, predictive policing, background checks, news feeds, ride-sharing platforms, social media, and election interference. Using these case studies, the authors provide a better understanding of machine fairness and algorithmic transparency. They explain why interventions in algorithmic systems are necessary to ensure that algorithms are not used to control citizens' participation in politics and undercut democracy. This title is also available as Open Access on Cambridge Core
  4. Miller, S.: Privacy, data bases and computers (1998) 0.01
    0.006360204 = product of:
      0.025440816 = sum of:
        0.025440816 = product of:
          0.05088163 = sum of:
            0.05088163 = weight(_text_:22 in 3027) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.05088163 = score(doc=3027,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16438834 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04694356 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3027, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3027)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Date
    22. 2.1999 15:57:43
  5. Seadle, M.: Copyright in a networked world : ethics and infringement (2004) 0.01
    0.006360204 = product of:
      0.025440816 = sum of:
        0.025440816 = product of:
          0.05088163 = sum of:
            0.05088163 = weight(_text_:22 in 2833) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.05088163 = score(doc=2833,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16438834 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04694356 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2833, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2833)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.1, S.106-110
  6. Hammwöhner, R.: Anmerkungen zur Grundlegung der Informationsethik (2006) 0.01
    0.006360204 = product of:
      0.025440816 = sum of:
        0.025440816 = product of:
          0.05088163 = sum of:
            0.05088163 = weight(_text_:22 in 6063) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.05088163 = score(doc=6063,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16438834 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04694356 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 6063, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6063)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Date
    13.10.2006 10:22:03
  7. O'Neil, R.M.: Free speech in cyberspace (1998) 0.01
    0.006360204 = product of:
      0.025440816 = sum of:
        0.025440816 = product of:
          0.05088163 = sum of:
            0.05088163 = weight(_text_:22 in 248) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.05088163 = score(doc=248,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16438834 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04694356 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 248, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=248)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Date
    22. 2.1999 15:50:50
  8. Helbing, D.: ¬Das große Scheitern (2019) 0.01
    0.006360204 = product of:
      0.025440816 = sum of:
        0.025440816 = product of:
          0.05088163 = sum of:
            0.05088163 = weight(_text_:22 in 5599) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.05088163 = score(doc=5599,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16438834 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04694356 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 5599, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5599)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Date
    25.12.2019 14:19:22
  9. Aghemo, A.: Etica professionale e servizio di informazione (1993) 0.01
    0.0055651786 = product of:
      0.022260714 = sum of:
        0.022260714 = product of:
          0.04452143 = sum of:
            0.04452143 = weight(_text_:22 in 2453) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04452143 = score(doc=2453,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16438834 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04694356 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2453, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2453)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Date
    6. 4.1996 13:22:31
  10. Lengauer, E.: Analytische Rechtsethik im Kontext säkularer Begründungsdiskurse zur Würde biologischer Entitäten (2008) 0.01
    0.0055651786 = product of:
      0.022260714 = sum of:
        0.022260714 = product of:
          0.04452143 = sum of:
            0.04452143 = weight(_text_:22 in 1697) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04452143 = score(doc=1697,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16438834 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04694356 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 1697, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1697)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Date
    17. 3.2008 15:17:22
  11. Smith, M.M.: Online information ethics : online searching and the searching self (1994) 0.00
    0.00411989 = product of:
      0.01647956 = sum of:
        0.01647956 = product of:
          0.06591824 = sum of:
            0.06591824 = weight(_text_:based in 8599) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06591824 = score(doc=8599,freq=8.0), product of:
                0.14144066 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.0129938 = idf(docFreq=5906, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04694356 = queryNorm
                0.46604872 = fieldWeight in 8599, product of:
                  2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                    8.0 = termFreq=8.0
                  3.0129938 = idf(docFreq=5906, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=8599)
          0.25 = coord(1/4)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    Describes the foundations of online information ethics by combining the insights of cognitive psychologist, Ulrich Neisser, and information science professor, Rafael Capurro. Capurro contrasts rule based ethics, such as codes, and self based ethics. Rule based ethics are necessary, but self based ethics lead to life enhancing uses of information and information technology. Neisser describes the self by defining 5 aspects of self understanding. Challenges information professionals to create environments and interpersonal interactions which create success in information seeking and provide the users with life enhancing search narratives
  12. Johnson, W.G.: ¬The need for a value-based reference policy : John Rawls at the reference desk (1994) 0.00
    0.0040776334 = product of:
      0.016310534 = sum of:
        0.016310534 = product of:
          0.065242134 = sum of:
            0.065242134 = weight(_text_:based in 2457) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.065242134 = score(doc=2457,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.14144066 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.0129938 = idf(docFreq=5906, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04694356 = queryNorm
                0.4612686 = fieldWeight in 2457, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  3.0129938 = idf(docFreq=5906, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2457)
          0.25 = coord(1/4)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    A value-based reference policy satisfies both the practical convcerns of the reference librarian and the principles stated in the Library Bill of Rights and the ALA Code of Ethics. One such value is justice, as described by John Rawls in 'A Theory of Justice'. A reference policy based on Rawls' system provides equitable service to all members of an academic community while permitting the librarian to uphold the ideal of freedom of access to information
  13. Reed, G.M.; Sanders, J.W.: ¬The principle of distribution (2008) 0.00
    0.003975128 = product of:
      0.015900511 = sum of:
        0.015900511 = product of:
          0.031801023 = sum of:
            0.031801023 = weight(_text_:22 in 1868) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.031801023 = score(doc=1868,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16438834 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04694356 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1868, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1868)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Date
    1. 6.2008 12:22:41
  14. Homan, P.A.: Library catalog notes for "bad books" : ethics vs. responsibilities (2012) 0.00
    0.003975128 = product of:
      0.015900511 = sum of:
        0.015900511 = product of:
          0.031801023 = sum of:
            0.031801023 = weight(_text_:22 in 420) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.031801023 = score(doc=420,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16438834 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04694356 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 420, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=420)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Date
    27. 9.2012 14:22:00
  15. Mai, J.-E.: Ethics, values and morality in contemporary library classifications (2013) 0.00
    0.0035679291 = product of:
      0.014271717 = sum of:
        0.014271717 = product of:
          0.057086866 = sum of:
            0.057086866 = weight(_text_:based in 1065) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.057086866 = score(doc=1065,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.14144066 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.0129938 = idf(docFreq=5906, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04694356 = queryNorm
                0.40361002 = fieldWeight in 1065, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  3.0129938 = idf(docFreq=5906, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1065)
          0.25 = coord(1/4)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    This paper explores the ethics of classification. The paper outlines recent conceptual moves in knowledge organization research and shows that contemporary classification theory is based on a pragmatic understanding of the world. It suggests that unjust statements and assumptions about the world challenge contemporary library classifications and that a proper response is needed. It outlines a framework for the development of ethical classifications based on MacIntyre's practice-based ethical theory. It provides a framework within which editors and managers of library classifications can make ethically sound decisions.
  16. Information ethics : privacy, property, and power (2005) 0.00
    0.0028108396 = product of:
      0.011243358 = sum of:
        0.011243358 = product of:
          0.022486717 = sum of:
            0.022486717 = weight(_text_:22 in 2392) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.022486717 = score(doc=2392,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.16438834 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04694356 = queryNorm
                0.13679022 = fieldWeight in 2392, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=2392)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Classification
    323.44/5 22 (GBV;LoC)
    DDC
    323.44/5 22 (GBV;LoC)
  17. "Code of Ethics" verabschiedet (2007) 0.00
    0.0027825893 = product of:
      0.011130357 = sum of:
        0.011130357 = product of:
          0.022260714 = sum of:
            0.022260714 = weight(_text_:22 in 459) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.022260714 = score(doc=459,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16438834 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04694356 = queryNorm
                0.1354154 = fieldWeight in 459, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=459)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    Im Rahmen des 3. Leipziger Kongresses für Information und Bibliothek 19.-22. März 2007 hat Bibliothek & Information Deutschland (BID) die im folgenden wiedergegebenen "Ethischen Grundsätze der Bibliotheks- und Informationsberufe" verabschiedet und der Presse und Fachöffentlichkeit vorgestellt. Damit folgt Deutschland den rund 40 Ländern weltweit, die bereits einen "Code of Ethics" veröffentlicht haben. Diese ethischen Richtlinien sind auf der IFLA/FAIFE-Website gesammelt unter www.ifla.org/faife/ethics/codes.htm.
  18. Beghtol, C.: ¬A proposed ethical warrant for global knowledge representation and organization systems (2002) 0.00
    0.0024970302 = product of:
      0.009988121 = sum of:
        0.009988121 = product of:
          0.039952483 = sum of:
            0.039952483 = weight(_text_:based in 4462) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.039952483 = score(doc=4462,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.14144066 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.0129938 = idf(docFreq=5906, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04694356 = queryNorm
                0.28246817 = fieldWeight in 4462, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.0129938 = idf(docFreq=5906, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4462)
          0.25 = coord(1/4)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    New technologies have made the increased globalization of information resources and services possible. In this situation, it is ethically and intellectually beneficial to protect cultural and information diversity. This paper analyzes the problems of creating ethically based globally accessible and culturally acceptable knowledge representation and organization systems, and foundation principles for the ethical treatment of different cultures are established on the basis of the United Nations Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR). The concept of "cultural hospitality", which can act as a theoretical framework for the ethical warrant of knowledge representation and organization systems, is described. This broad discussion is grounded with an extended example of one cultural universal, the concept of time and its expression in calendars. Methods of achieving cultural and user hospitality in information systems are discussed for their potential for creating ethically based systems. It is concluded that cultural hospitality is a promising concept for assessing the ethical foundations of new knowledge representation and organization systems and for planning revisions to existing systems.
  19. "Code of Ethics" verabschiedet (2007) 0.00
    0.0023850764 = product of:
      0.0095403055 = sum of:
        0.0095403055 = product of:
          0.019080611 = sum of:
            0.019080611 = weight(_text_:22 in 462) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.019080611 = score(doc=462,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16438834 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04694356 = queryNorm
                0.116070345 = fieldWeight in 462, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=462)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    Im Rahmen des 3. Leipziger Kongresses für Information und Bibliothek 19.-22. März 2007 hat Bibliothek & Information Deutschland (BID) die im folgenden wiedergegebenen "Ethischen Grundsätze der Bibliotheks- und Informationsberufe" verabschiedet und der Presse und Fachöffentlichkeit vorgestellt. Damit folgt Deutschland den rund 40 Ländern weltweit, die bereits einen "Code of Ethics" veröffentlicht haben. Diese ethischen Richtlinien sind auf der IFLA/FAIFE-Website gesammelt unter www.ifla.org/faife/ethics/codes.htm.
  20. Jones, R.A.: ¬The ethics of research in cyberspace (1995) 0.00
    0.0023542228 = product of:
      0.009416891 = sum of:
        0.009416891 = product of:
          0.037667565 = sum of:
            0.037667565 = weight(_text_:based in 2458) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.037667565 = score(doc=2458,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14144066 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.0129938 = idf(docFreq=5906, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04694356 = queryNorm
                0.26631355 = fieldWeight in 2458, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.0129938 = idf(docFreq=5906, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2458)
          0.25 = coord(1/4)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    As computers, the Internet, online digtial resources, and eventually the National Information Infrastructure become increasingly important. The study of their use has become a fast growing areas in social science. This research is important but it raises questions of ethics and human dignity. Major research universities have guidelines for this kind of scholarship, based on the Nuremberg Code and/or the Belmont principles. But research in cyberspace was not on the minds of those drafting these guidelines. Discusses some of the difficulties produced by tensions between traditional guidelines and new technologies

Years

Languages

  • e 23
  • d 5
  • i 1
  • More… Less…

Types