Search (553 results, page 1 of 28)

  • × type_ss:"el"
  1. Kleineberg, M.: Context analysis and context indexing : formal pragmatics in knowledge organization (2014) 0.12 
    0.12347793 = product of:
  0.18521689 = sum of:
    0.12821928 = product of:
      0.38465783 = sum of:
        0.38465783 = weight(_text_:3a in 1826) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.38465783 = score(doc=1826,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.41065353 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.048437484 = queryNorm
            0.93669677 = fieldWeight in 1826, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1826)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    0.05699761 = weight(_text_:web in 1826) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.05699761 = score(doc=1826,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.15807624 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.048437484 = queryNorm
        0.36057037 = fieldWeight in 1826, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1826)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    Source
    http://www.google.de/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=5&ved=0CDQQFjAE&url=http%3A%2F%2Fdigbib.ubka.uni-karlsruhe.de%2Fvolltexte%2Fdocuments%2F3131107&ei=HzFWVYvGMsiNsgGTyoFI&usg=AFQjCNE2FHUeR9oQTQlNC4TPedv4Mo3DaQ&sig2=Rlzpr7a3BLZZkqZCXXN_IA&bvm=bv.93564037,d.bGg&cad=rja
  2. Eckert, K.: SKOS: eine Sprache für die Übertragung von Thesauri ins Semantic Web (2011) 0.09 
    0.08547392 = product of:
  0.12821087 = sum of:
    0.10196043 = weight(_text_:web in 4331) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.10196043 = score(doc=4331,freq=10.0), product of:
        0.15807624 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.048437484 = queryNorm
        0.6450079 = fieldWeight in 4331, product of:
          3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
            10.0 = termFreq=10.0
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4331)
    0.02625044 = product of:
      0.05250088 = sum of:
        0.05250088 = weight(_text_:22 in 4331) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05250088 = score(doc=4331,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16961981 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.048437484 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4331, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4331)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    Abstract
    Das Semantic Web - bzw. Linked Data - hat das Potenzial, die Verfügbarkeit von Daten und Wissen, sowie den Zugriff darauf zu revolutionieren. Einen großen Beitrag dazu können Wissensorganisationssysteme wie Thesauri leisten, die die Daten inhaltlich erschließen und strukturieren. Leider sind immer noch viele dieser Systeme lediglich in Buchform oder in speziellen Anwendungen verfügbar. Wie also lassen sie sich für das Semantic Web nutzen? Das Simple Knowledge Organization System (SKOS) bietet eine Möglichkeit, die Wissensorganisationssysteme in eine Form zu "übersetzen", die im Web zitiert und mit anderen Resourcen verknüpft werden kann.
    Date
    15. 3.2011 19:21:22
    Theme
    Semantic Web
  3. OWL Web Ontology Language Test Cases (2004) 0.09 
    0.08547392 = product of:
  0.12821087 = sum of:
    0.10196043 = weight(_text_:web in 4685) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.10196043 = score(doc=4685,freq=10.0), product of:
        0.15807624 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.048437484 = queryNorm
        0.6450079 = fieldWeight in 4685, product of:
          3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
            10.0 = termFreq=10.0
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4685)
    0.02625044 = product of:
      0.05250088 = sum of:
        0.05250088 = weight(_text_:22 in 4685) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05250088 = score(doc=4685,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16961981 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.048437484 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4685, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4685)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    Abstract
    This document contains and presents test cases for the Web Ontology Language (OWL) approved by the Web Ontology Working Group. Many of the test cases illustrate the correct usage of the Web Ontology Language (OWL), and the formal meaning of its constructs. Other test cases illustrate the resolution of issues considered by the Working Group. Conformance for OWL documents and OWL document checkers is specified.
    Date
    14. 8.2011 13:33:22
    Theme
    Semantic Web
  4. Hafner, R.; Schelling, B.: Automatisierung der Sacherschließung mit Semantic Web Technologie (2015) 0.08 
    0.083823286 = product of:
  0.12573493 = sum of:
    0.07979666 = weight(_text_:web in 8365) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.07979666 = score(doc=8365,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.15807624 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.048437484 = queryNorm
        0.50479853 = fieldWeight in 8365, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=8365)
    0.045938272 = product of:
      0.091876544 = sum of:
        0.091876544 = weight(_text_:22 in 8365) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.091876544 = score(doc=8365,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16961981 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.048437484 = queryNorm
            0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 8365, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=8365)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    Date
    22. 6.2015 16:08:38
  5. Dextre Clarke, S.G.: Challenges and opportunities for KOS standards (2007) 0.08 
    0.083823286 = product of:
  0.12573493 = sum of:
    0.07979666 = weight(_text_:web in 4643) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.07979666 = score(doc=4643,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.15807624 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.048437484 = queryNorm
        0.50479853 = fieldWeight in 4643, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4643)
    0.045938272 = product of:
      0.091876544 = sum of:
        0.091876544 = weight(_text_:22 in 4643) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.091876544 = score(doc=4643,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16961981 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.048437484 = queryNorm
            0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 4643, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4643)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    Date
    22. 9.2007 15:41:14
    Theme
    Semantic Web
  6. Hollink, L.; Assem, M. van: Estimating the relevance of search results in the Culture-Web : a study of semantic distance measures (2010) 0.08 
    0.08152235 = product of:
  0.122283526 = sum of:
    0.102595694 = weight(_text_:web in 4649) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.102595694 = score(doc=4649,freq=18.0), product of:
        0.15807624 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.048437484 = queryNorm
        0.64902663 = fieldWeight in 4649, product of:
          4.2426405 = tf(freq=18.0), with freq of:
            18.0 = termFreq=18.0
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4649)
    0.01968783 = product of:
      0.03937566 = sum of:
        0.03937566 = weight(_text_:22 in 4649) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03937566 = score(doc=4649,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16961981 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.048437484 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4649, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4649)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    Abstract
    More and more cultural heritage institutions publish their collections, vocabularies and metadata on the Web. The resulting Web of linked cultural data opens up exciting new possibilities for searching and browsing through these cultural heritage collections. We report on ongoing work in which we investigate the estimation of relevance in this Web of Culture. We study existing measures of semantic distance and how they apply to two use cases. The use cases relate to the structured, multilingual and multimodal nature of the Culture Web. We distinguish between measures using the Web, such as Google distance and PMI, and measures using the Linked Data Web, i.e. the semantic structure of metadata vocabularies. We perform a small study in which we compare these semantic distance measures to human judgements of relevance. Although it is too early to draw any definitive conclusions, the study provides new insights into the applicability of semantic distance measures to the Web of Culture, and clear starting points for further research.
    Date
    26.12.2011 13:40:22
    Theme
    Semantic Web
  7. Schneider, R.: Bibliothek 1.0, 2.0 oder 3.0? (2008) 0.08 
    0.08046646 = product of:
  0.12069968 = sum of:
    0.09773055 = weight(_text_:web in 6122) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.09773055 = score(doc=6122,freq=12.0), product of:
        0.15807624 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.048437484 = queryNorm
        0.6182494 = fieldWeight in 6122, product of:
          3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
            12.0 = termFreq=12.0
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6122)
    0.022969136 = product of:
      0.045938272 = sum of:
        0.045938272 = weight(_text_:22 in 6122) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.045938272 = score(doc=6122,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16961981 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.048437484 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 6122, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6122)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    Abstract
    Noch ist nicht entschieden mit welcher Vehemenz das sogenannte Web 2.0 die Bibliotheken verändern wird. Allerdings wird hier und da bereits mit Bezugnahme auf das sogenannte Semantic Web von einer dritten und mancherorts von einer vierten Generation des Web gesprochen. Der Vortrag hinterfragt kritisch, welche Konzepte sich hinter diesen Bezeichnungen verbergen und geht der Frage nach, welche Herausforderungen eine Übernahme dieser Konzepte für die Bibliothekswelt mit sich bringen würde. Vgl. insbes. Folie 22 mit einer Darstellung von der Entwicklung vom Web 1.0 zum Web 4.0
    Object
    Web 2.0
  8. Mayfield, J.; Finin, T.: Information retrieval on the Semantic Web : integrating inference and retrieval 0.08 
    0.08046646 = product of:
  0.12069968 = sum of:
    0.09773055 = weight(_text_:web in 4330) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.09773055 = score(doc=4330,freq=12.0), product of:
        0.15807624 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.048437484 = queryNorm
        0.6182494 = fieldWeight in 4330, product of:
          3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
            12.0 = termFreq=12.0
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4330)
    0.022969136 = product of:
      0.045938272 = sum of:
        0.045938272 = weight(_text_:22 in 4330) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.045938272 = score(doc=4330,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16961981 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.048437484 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 4330, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4330)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    Abstract
    One vision of the Semantic Web is that it will be much like the Web we know today, except that documents will be enriched by annotations in machine understandable markup. These annotations will provide metadata about the documents as well as machine interpretable statements capturing some of the meaning of document content. We discuss how the information retrieval paradigm might be recast in such an environment. We suggest that retrieval can be tightly bound to inference. Doing so makes today's Web search engines useful to Semantic Web inference engines, and causes improvements in either retrieval or inference to lead directly to improvements in the other.
    Date
    12. 2.2011 17:35:22
    Theme
    Semantic Web
  9. Mitchell, J.S.: DDC 22 : an introduction (2003) 0.07 
    0.07185687 = product of:
  0.10778531 = sum of:
    0.056424756 = weight(_text_:web in 1936) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.056424756 = score(doc=1936,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.15807624 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.048437484 = queryNorm
        0.35694647 = fieldWeight in 1936, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1936)
    0.05136055 = product of:
      0.1027211 = sum of:
        0.1027211 = weight(_text_:22 in 1936) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.1027211 = score(doc=1936,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.16961981 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.048437484 = queryNorm
            0.6055961 = fieldWeight in 1936, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1936)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    Abstract
    Dewey Decimal Classification and Relative Index, Edition 22 (DDC 22) will be issued simultaneously in print and web versions in July 2003. The new edition is the first full print update to the Dewey Decimal Classification system in seven years-it includes several significant updates and many new numbers and topics. DDC 22 also features some fundamental structural changes that have been introduced with the goals of promoting classifier efficiency and improving the DDC for use in a variety of applications in the web environment. Most importantly, the content of the new edition has been shaped by the needs and recommendations of Dewey users around the world. The worldwide user community has an important role in shaping the future of the DDC.
    Object
    DDC-22
  10. Broughton, V.: Automatic metadata generation : Digital resource description without human intervention (2007) 0.07 
    0.07184853 = product of:
  0.10777278 = sum of:
    0.06839713 = weight(_text_:web in 6048) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.06839713 = score(doc=6048,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.15807624 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.048437484 = queryNorm
        0.43268442 = fieldWeight in 6048, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6048)
    0.03937566 = product of:
      0.07875132 = sum of:
        0.07875132 = weight(_text_:22 in 6048) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07875132 = score(doc=6048,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16961981 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.048437484 = queryNorm
            0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 6048, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6048)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    Date
    22. 9.2007 15:41:14
    Theme
    Semantic Web
  11. Tudhope, D.: Knowledge Organization System Services : brief review of NKOS activities and possibility of KOS registries (2007) 0.07 
    0.07184853 = product of:
  0.10777278 = sum of:
    0.06839713 = weight(_text_:web in 100) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.06839713 = score(doc=100,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.15807624 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.048437484 = queryNorm
        0.43268442 = fieldWeight in 100, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=100)
    0.03937566 = product of:
      0.07875132 = sum of:
        0.07875132 = weight(_text_:22 in 100) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07875132 = score(doc=100,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16961981 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.048437484 = queryNorm
            0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 100, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=100)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    Date
    22. 9.2007 15:41:14
    Theme
    Semantic Web
  12. Rogers, I.: ¬The Google Pagerank algorithm and how it works (2002) 0.07 
    0.07055211 = product of:
  0.10582816 = sum of:
    0.028498804 = weight(_text_:web in 2548) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.028498804 = score(doc=2548,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.15807624 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.048437484 = queryNorm
        0.18028519 = fieldWeight in 2548, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2548)
    0.07732935 = product of:
      0.1546587 = sum of:
        0.1546587 = weight(_text_:designer in 2548) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.1546587 = score(doc=2548,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.36824805 = queryWeight, product of:
              7.602543 = idf(docFreq=59, maxDocs=44218)
              0.048437484 = queryNorm
            0.41998512 = fieldWeight in 2548, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              7.602543 = idf(docFreq=59, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2548)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    Abstract
    Page Rank is a topic much discussed by Search Engine Optimisation (SEO) experts. At the heart of PageRank is a mathematical formula that seems scary to look at but is actually fairly simple to understand. Despite this many people seem to get it wrong! In particular "Chris Ridings of www.searchenginesystems.net" has written a paper entitled "PageRank Explained: Everything you've always wanted to know about PageRank", pointed to by many people, that contains a fundamental mistake early on in the explanation! Unfortunately this means some of the recommendations in the paper are not quite accurate. By showing code to correctly calculate real PageRank I hope to achieve several things in this response: - Clearly explain how PageRank is calculated. - Go through every example in Chris' paper, and add some more of my own, showing the correct PageRank for each diagram. By showing the code used to calculate each diagram I've opened myself up to peer review - mostly in an effort to make sure the examples are correct, but also because the code can help explain the PageRank calculations. - Describe some principles and observations on website design based on these correctly calculated examples. Any good web designer should take the time to fully understand how PageRank really works - if you don't then your site's layout could be seriously hurting your Google listings! [Note: I have nothing in particular against Chris. If I find any other papers on the subject I'll try to comment evenly]
  13. Shala, E.: ¬Die Autonomie des Menschen und der Maschine : gegenwärtige Definitionen von Autonomie zwischen philosophischem Hintergrund und technologischer Umsetzbarkeit (2014) 0.06 
    0.061738964 = product of:
  0.092608444 = sum of:
    0.06410964 = product of:
      0.19232891 = sum of:
        0.19232891 = weight(_text_:3a in 4388) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.19232891 = score(doc=4388,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.41065353 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.048437484 = queryNorm
            0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 4388, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4388)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    0.028498804 = weight(_text_:web in 4388) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.028498804 = score(doc=4388,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.15807624 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.048437484 = queryNorm
        0.18028519 = fieldWeight in 4388, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4388)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    Footnote
    Vgl. unter: https://www.google.de/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=2&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=2ahUKEwizweHljdbcAhVS16QKHXcFD9QQFjABegQICRAB&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.researchgate.net%2Fpublication%2F271200105_Die_Autonomie_des_Menschen_und_der_Maschine_-_gegenwartige_Definitionen_von_Autonomie_zwischen_philosophischem_Hintergrund_und_technologischer_Umsetzbarkeit_Redigierte_Version_der_Magisterarbeit_Karls&usg=AOvVaw06orrdJmFF2xbCCp_hL26q.
  14. Heflin, J.; Hendler, J.: Semantic interoperability on the Web (2000) 0.06 
    0.061383378 = product of:
  0.092075065 = sum of:
    0.06910593 = weight(_text_:web in 759) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.06910593 = score(doc=759,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.15807624 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.048437484 = queryNorm
        0.43716836 = fieldWeight in 759, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=759)
    0.022969136 = product of:
      0.045938272 = sum of:
        0.045938272 = weight(_text_:22 in 759) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.045938272 = score(doc=759,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16961981 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.048437484 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 759, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=759)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    Abstract
    XML will have a profound impact on the way data is exchanged on the Internet. An important feature of this language is the separation of content from presentation, which makes it easier to select and/or reformat the data. However, due to the likelihood of numerous industry and domain specific DTDs, those who wish to integrate information will still be faced with the problem of semantic interoperability. In this paper we discuss why this problem is not solved by XML, and then discuss why the Resource Description Framework is only a partial solution. We then present the SHOE language, which we feel has many of the features necessary to enable a semantic web, and describe an existing set of tools that make it easy to use the language.
    Date
    11. 5.2013 19:22:18
    Theme
    Semantic Web
  15. Wesch, M.: Web 2.0 ... The Machine is Us/ing Us (2006) 0.06 
    0.06049058 = product of:
  0.09073587 = sum of:
    0.06448543 = weight(_text_:web in 3478) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.06448543 = score(doc=3478,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.15807624 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.048437484 = queryNorm
        0.4079388 = fieldWeight in 3478, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3478)
    0.02625044 = product of:
      0.05250088 = sum of:
        0.05250088 = weight(_text_:22 in 3478) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05250088 = score(doc=3478,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16961981 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.048437484 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3478, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3478)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    Abstract
    Web 2.0 in just under 5 minutes.
    Date
    5. 1.2008 19:22:48
  16. Hartmann, S.; Haffner, A.: Linked-RDA-Data in der Praxis (2010) 0.06 
    0.06049058 = product of:
  0.09073587 = sum of:
    0.06448543 = weight(_text_:web in 1679) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.06448543 = score(doc=1679,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.15807624 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.048437484 = queryNorm
        0.4079388 = fieldWeight in 1679, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1679)
    0.02625044 = product of:
      0.05250088 = sum of:
        0.05250088 = weight(_text_:22 in 1679) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05250088 = score(doc=1679,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16961981 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.048437484 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1679, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1679)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    Abstract
    Durch den neuen Erschließungsstandard "Resource Description and Access" (RDA) lassen sich bibliografische Daten sowie Normdaten Semantic-Web-konform repräsentieren. Der Vortrag soll aufzeigen, welche Auswirkungen RDA auf die Katalogisierung in Bibliotheken und den Zugang zu den erschlossenen Ressourcen im Semantic Web hat. Anhand erster Erfahrungen aus praktischen Umsetzungen wird erläutert, wie bibliografische Daten durch RDA und Linked-Data-Technologien besser zugänglich gemacht und vor allem nachgenutzt werden können.
    Date
    13. 2.2011 20:22:23
  17. Tay, A.: ¬The next generation discovery citation indexes : a review of the landscape in 2020 (2020) 0.05 
    0.052929264 = product of:
  0.07939389 = sum of:
    0.056424756 = weight(_text_:web in 40) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.056424756 = score(doc=40,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.15807624 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.048437484 = queryNorm
        0.35694647 = fieldWeight in 40, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=40)
    0.022969136 = product of:
      0.045938272 = sum of:
        0.045938272 = weight(_text_:22 in 40) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.045938272 = score(doc=40,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16961981 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.048437484 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 40, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=40)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    Abstract
    Conclusion There is a reason why Google Scholar and Web of Science/Scopus are kings of the hills in their various arenas. They have strong brand recogniton, a head start in development and a mass of eyeballs and users that leads to an almost virtious cycle of improvement. Competing against such well established competitors is not easy even when one has deep pockets (Microsoft) or a killer idea (scite). It will be interesting to see how the landscape will look like in 2030. Stay tuned for part II where I review each particular index.
    Date
    17.11.2020 12:22:59
    Object
    Web of Science
  18. Firnkes, M.: Schöne neue Welt : der Content der Zukunft wird von Algorithmen bestimmt (2015) 0.05 
    0.052614328 = product of:
  0.07892149 = sum of:
    0.059233658 = weight(_text_:web in 2118) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.059233658 = score(doc=2118,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.15807624 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.048437484 = queryNorm
        0.37471575 = fieldWeight in 2118, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2118)
    0.01968783 = product of:
      0.03937566 = sum of:
        0.03937566 = weight(_text_:22 in 2118) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03937566 = score(doc=2118,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16961981 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.048437484 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2118, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2118)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    Abstract
    Während das Internet vor noch nicht allzu langer Zeit hauptsächlich ein weiteres Informationsmedium darstellte, so explodieren die technischen Möglichkeiten derzeit förmlich. Diese stärken nicht nur den gegenseitigen Austausch der Nutzer. Sie alle vermessen unsere täglichen Gewohnheiten - auf sehr vielfältige Art und Weise. Die Mechanismen, die das gekaufte Web ausmachen, werden hierdurch komplexer. In den meisten neuen Technologien und Anwendungen verbergen sich Wege, die Verbraucherverführung zu perfektionieren. Nicht wenige davon dürften zudem für die Politik und andere Interessensverbände von Bedeutung sein, als alternativer Kanal, um Wählergruppen und Unterstützer zu mobilisieren. Das nachfolgende Kapitel nennt die wichtigsten Trends der nächsten Jahre, mitsamt ihren möglichen manipulativen Auswirkungen. Nur wenn wir beobachten, von wem die Zukunftstechniken wie genutzt werden, können wir kommerziellen Auswüchsen vorbeugen.
    Content
    Mit Verweis auf das Buch: Firnkes, M.: Das gekaufte Web: wie wir online manipuliert werden. Hannover : Heise Zeitschriften Verlag 2015. 220 S.
    Date
    5. 7.2015 22:02:31
    Theme
    Semantic Web
  19. Blosser, J.; Michaelson, R.; Routh. R.; Xia, P.: Defining the landscape of Web resources : Concluding Report of the BAER Web Resources Sub-Group (2000) 0.05 
    0.048963882 = product of:
  0.07344582 = sum of:
    0.0603206 = weight(_text_:web in 1447) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0603206 = score(doc=1447,freq=14.0), product of:
        0.15807624 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.048437484 = queryNorm
        0.38159183 = fieldWeight in 1447, product of:
          3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
            14.0 = termFreq=14.0
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1447)
    0.01312522 = product of:
      0.02625044 = sum of:
        0.02625044 = weight(_text_:22 in 1447) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02625044 = score(doc=1447,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16961981 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.048437484 = queryNorm
            0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 1447, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1447)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    Abstract
    The BAER Web Resources Group was charged in October 1999 with defining and describing the parameters of electronic resources that do not clearly belong to the categories being defined by the BAER Digital Group or the BAER Electronic Journals Group. After some difficulty identifying precisely which resources fell under the Group's charge, we finally named the following types of resources for our consideration: web sites, electronic texts, indexes, databases and abstracts, online reference resources, and networked and non-networked CD-ROMs. Electronic resources are a vast and growing collection that touch nearly every department within the Library. It is unrealistic to think one department can effectively administer all aspects of the collection. The Group then began to focus on the concern of bibliographic access to these varied resources, and to define parameters for handling or processing them within the Library. Some key elements became evident as the work progressed. * Selection process of resources to be acquired for the collection * Duplication of effort * Use of CORC * Resource Finder design * Maintenance of Resource Finder * CD-ROMs not networked * Communications * Voyager search limitations. An unexpected collaboration with the Web Development Committee on the Resource Finder helped to steer the Group to more detailed descriptions of bibliographic access. This collaboration included development of data elements for the Resource Finder database, and some discussions on Library staff processing of the resources. The Web Resources Group invited expert testimony to help the Group broaden its view to envision public use of the resources and discuss concerns related to technical services processing. The first testimony came from members of the Resource Finder Committee. Some background information on the Web Development Resource Finder Committee was shared. The second testimony was from librarians who select electronic texts. Three main themes were addressed: accessing CD-ROMs; the issue of including non-networked CD-ROMs in the Resource Finder; and, some special concerns about electronic texts. The third testimony came from librarians who select indexes and abstracts and also provide Reference services. Appendices to this report include minutes of the meetings with the experts (Appendix A), a list of proposed data elements to be used in the Resource Finder (Appendix B), and recommendations made to the Resource Finder Committee (Appendix C). Below are summaries of the key elements.
    Date
    21. 4.2002 10:22:31
  20. Danowski, P.: Authority files and Web 2.0 : Wikipedia and the PND. An Example (2007) 0.05 
    0.04893609 = product of:
  0.07340413 = sum of:
    0.05699761 = weight(_text_:web in 1291) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.05699761 = score(doc=1291,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.15807624 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.048437484 = queryNorm
        0.36057037 = fieldWeight in 1291, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1291)
    0.016406527 = product of:
      0.032813054 = sum of:
        0.032813054 = weight(_text_:22 in 1291) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.032813054 = score(doc=1291,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16961981 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.048437484 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1291, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1291)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    Abstract
    More and more users index everything on their own in the web 2.0. There are services for links, videos, pictures, books, encyclopaedic articles and scientific articles. All these services are library independent. But must that really be? Can't libraries help with their experience and tools to make user indexing better? On the experience of a project from German language Wikipedia together with the German person authority files (Personen Namen Datei - PND) located at German National Library (Deutsche Nationalbibliothek) I would like to show what is possible. How users can and will use the authority files, if we let them. We will take a look how the project worked and what we can learn for future projects. Conclusions - Authority files can have a role in the web 2.0 - there must be an open interface/ service for retrieval - everything that is indexed on the net with authority files can be easy integrated in a federated search - O'Reilly: You have to found ways that your data get more important that more it will be used
    Content
    Vortrag anlässlich des Workshops: "Extending the multilingual capacity of The European Library in the EDL project Stockholm, Swedish National Library, 22-23 November 2007".
    Object
    Web 2.0

Authors

Years

Languages

  • e 379
  • d 155
  • a 5
  • el 2
  • f 2
  • i 2
  • nl 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 227
  • i 17
  • n 13
  • r 12
  • s 10
  • x 10
  • m 8
  • b 2
  • p 1
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects

Classifications