-
Ross, J.: ¬The impact of technology on indexing (2000)
0.03
0.027357837 = product of:
0.054715674 = sum of:
0.054715674 = product of:
0.10943135 = sum of:
0.10943135 = weight(_text_:22 in 263) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.10943135 = score(doc=263,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17677537 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.050480857 = queryNorm
0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 263, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=263)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Indexer. 22(2000) no.1, S.25-26
-
Walker, A.: Indexing commonplace books : John Locke's method (2001)
0.03
0.027357837 = product of:
0.054715674 = sum of:
0.054715674 = product of:
0.10943135 = sum of:
0.10943135 = weight(_text_:22 in 13) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.10943135 = score(doc=13,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17677537 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.050480857 = queryNorm
0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 13, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=13)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Indexer. 22(2001) no.3, S.14-18
-
Crystal, D.: Quote index unquote (2000)
0.03
0.027357837 = product of:
0.054715674 = sum of:
0.054715674 = product of:
0.10943135 = sum of:
0.10943135 = weight(_text_:22 in 487) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.10943135 = score(doc=487,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17677537 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.050480857 = queryNorm
0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 487, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=487)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Indexer. 22(2000) no.1, S.14-20
-
Matthews, D.: Indexing published letters (2001)
0.03
0.027357837 = product of:
0.054715674 = sum of:
0.054715674 = product of:
0.10943135 = sum of:
0.10943135 = weight(_text_:22 in 4160) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.10943135 = score(doc=4160,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17677537 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.050480857 = queryNorm
0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 4160, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4160)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Indexer. 22(2001) no.3, S.135-141
-
Gratch, B.; Settel, B.; Atherton, P.: Characteristics of book indexes for subject retrieval in the humanities and social sciences (1978)
0.02
0.023938108 = product of:
0.047876216 = sum of:
0.047876216 = product of:
0.09575243 = sum of:
0.09575243 = weight(_text_:22 in 1061) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09575243 = score(doc=1061,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17677537 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.050480857 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 1061, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1061)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Indexer. 11(1978), S.14-22
-
Davis, M.: Building a global legal index : a work in progress (2001)
0.02
0.023938108 = product of:
0.047876216 = sum of:
0.047876216 = product of:
0.09575243 = sum of:
0.09575243 = weight(_text_:22 in 6443) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09575243 = score(doc=6443,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17677537 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.050480857 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 6443, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6443)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Indexer. 22(2001) no.3, S.123-127
-
Browne, G.: ¬The definite article : acknowledging The in index entries (2001)
0.02
0.023938108 = product of:
0.047876216 = sum of:
0.047876216 = product of:
0.09575243 = sum of:
0.09575243 = weight(_text_:22 in 12) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09575243 = score(doc=12,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17677537 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.050480857 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 12, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=12)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Indexer. 22(2001) no.3, S.119-122
-
Weinberg, B.H.: Book indexes in France : medieval specimens and modern practices (2000)
0.02
0.023938108 = product of:
0.047876216 = sum of:
0.047876216 = product of:
0.09575243 = sum of:
0.09575243 = weight(_text_:22 in 486) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09575243 = score(doc=486,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17677537 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.050480857 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 486, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=486)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Indexer. 22(2000) no.1, S.2-13
-
Mauer, P.: Embedded indexing : pros and cons for the indexer (2000)
0.02
0.023938108 = product of:
0.047876216 = sum of:
0.047876216 = product of:
0.09575243 = sum of:
0.09575243 = weight(_text_:22 in 488) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09575243 = score(doc=488,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17677537 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.050480857 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 488, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=488)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Indexer. 22(2000) no.1, S.27-28
-
Anderson, C.R.: Indexing with a computer : past and present (2000)
0.02
0.023938108 = product of:
0.047876216 = sum of:
0.047876216 = product of:
0.09575243 = sum of:
0.09575243 = weight(_text_:22 in 489) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09575243 = score(doc=489,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17677537 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.050480857 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 489, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=489)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Indexer. 22(2000) no.1, S.23-24
-
Lee, D.: Judging indexes : the criteria for a good index (2001)
0.02
0.023938108 = product of:
0.047876216 = sum of:
0.047876216 = product of:
0.09575243 = sum of:
0.09575243 = weight(_text_:22 in 4162) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09575243 = score(doc=4162,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17677537 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.050480857 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 4162, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4162)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Indexer. 22(2001) no.4, S.191-194
-
Weinberg, B.H.: Predecessors of scientific indexing structures in the domain of religion (2001)
0.02
0.023938108 = product of:
0.047876216 = sum of:
0.047876216 = product of:
0.09575243 = sum of:
0.09575243 = weight(_text_:22 in 4172) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09575243 = score(doc=4172,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17677537 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.050480857 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 4172, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4172)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Indexer. 22(2001) no.4, S.178-180
-
Weinberg, B.H.: Index structures in early Hebrew Biblical word lists : preludes to the first Latin concordances (2004)
0.02
0.023938108 = product of:
0.047876216 = sum of:
0.047876216 = product of:
0.09575243 = sum of:
0.09575243 = weight(_text_:22 in 4180) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09575243 = score(doc=4180,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17677537 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.050480857 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 4180, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4180)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 17.10.2005 13:54:22
-
Bell, H.K.: Indexing biographies, and other stories of human lives (1992)
0.02
0.020518377 = product of:
0.041036755 = sum of:
0.041036755 = product of:
0.08207351 = sum of:
0.08207351 = weight(_text_:22 in 5396) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08207351 = score(doc=5396,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17677537 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.050480857 = queryNorm
0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 5396, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5396)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Footnote
- Rez. in: Knowledge organization 22(1995) no.1, S.46-47 (R. Fugmann)
-
Lathrop, L.: ¬An indexer's guide to the Internet (1999)
0.02
0.020518377 = product of:
0.041036755 = sum of:
0.041036755 = product of:
0.08207351 = sum of:
0.08207351 = weight(_text_:22 in 485) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08207351 = score(doc=485,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17677537 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.050480857 = queryNorm
0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 485, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=485)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Footnote
- Rez. in: Indexer 22(2000) no.1, S.51 (R. Davis)
-
Weinberg, B.H.: ¬The body of a reference work in relation to its index : an analysis of wordsmanship (1996)
0.02
0.019344913 = product of:
0.038689826 = sum of:
0.038689826 = product of:
0.07737965 = sum of:
0.07737965 = weight(_text_:22 in 6940) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07737965 = score(doc=6940,freq=4.0), product of:
0.17677537 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.050480857 = queryNorm
0.4377287 = fieldWeight in 6940, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6940)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 8. 3.1997 20:22:25
- Source
- Indexer. 20(1996) no.1, S.18-22
-
Olason, S.C.: Let's get usable! : Usability studies for indexes (2000)
0.02
0.019344913 = product of:
0.038689826 = sum of:
0.038689826 = product of:
0.07737965 = sum of:
0.07737965 = weight(_text_:22 in 882) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07737965 = score(doc=882,freq=4.0), product of:
0.17677537 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.050480857 = queryNorm
0.4377287 = fieldWeight in 882, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=882)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Footnote
- Vgl.: http://www.theindexer.org/files/22-2-olason.pdf.
- Source
- Indexer. 22(2000) no.2, S.91-95
-
Fassbender, J.: Register generell in schlechtem Zustand : DNI mahnt mehr Qualität an / Kontakt zu verwandten Organisationen gesucht (2008)
0.02
0.019321231 = product of:
0.038642462 = sum of:
0.038642462 = product of:
0.077284925 = sum of:
0.077284925 = weight(_text_:deutsch in 1823) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.077284925 = score(doc=1823,freq=2.0), product of:
0.2971175 = queryWeight, product of:
5.885746 = idf(docFreq=333, maxDocs=44218)
0.050480857 = queryNorm
0.26011568 = fieldWeight in 1823, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.885746 = idf(docFreq=333, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1823)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Content
- "Die Qualität der Register und das Fachwissen zur Registererstellung befindet sich hierzulande nach DNI-Einschätzung generell in einem schlechten Zustand - auch im wissenschaftlichen Verlagswesen. Grundlegende Fehler kommen immer wieder vor, sowohl was die Erstellung der Index-Einträge als auch typografische Aspekte angeht. Oft wird auch bei der Vorgehensweise der Registererstellung das Rad neu erfunden, obwohl es bewährte Tech n i ken, Methoden und Software gibt. Das DNI möchte helfen, diesen Zustand zu verbessern und derartige Defizite und verbreitete Fehleinschätzungen zum Indexing abzubauen. Ein Schwerpunkt der bisherigen Info-Veranstaltungen auf der Buchmesse waren Präsentationen moderner Software für die Indexerstellung. Dabei handelt es sich um Programme, die die intellektuelle Arbeit des Indexers auf effektive Weise unterstützen. Diese spezielle lndexing-Software ist in der weltweit führenden Indexing-Szene in angloamerikanischen Ländern weit verbreitet. Das DNI unterhält sehr gute Beziehungen zu den Partnerverbänden in anderen Ländern, so zum Beispiel zum Nederlands Indexers Netwerk (NIN), aber auch zu den großen Fachverbänden, der Society of indexers (SI) in Großbritannien und der American Society of Indexers (ASI). Die SI feierte letztes Jahr ihr 50-jähriges Bestehen und gibt seit 1958 die Fachzeitschrift »The Indexer - The International Journal of lndexing« heraus. Auf der DNI-Website (www.d-indexer.org) werden im Bereich »Fragen« Aspekte der Registererstellung erläutert. Der Bereich »Ressourcen« beinhaltet unter anderem eine Bibliografie mit deutsch sprachigem Kontext, Index-Rezensionen und Links zu Indexer-Fachverbänden. Im Bereich »Mitglieder« finden sich auch diejenigen Indexer, die Registererstellung für Verlage und andere Auftraggeber anbieten. Für eine spezielle Suche innerhalb der Website steht ein ständig aktualisierter Site Index zur Verfügung. Das DNI ist stets daran interessiert, neue Kontakte zu knüpfen, insbesondere auch zu fachlich verwand ten Organisationen und Personen, die ein Interesse daran haben, Registererstellung als eigenständiges Fachgebiet hierzulande voranzubringen."
-
Bell, H.K.: History of societies of indexing : part VII: 1992-95 (2000)
0.02
0.017098648 = product of:
0.034197297 = sum of:
0.034197297 = product of:
0.068394594 = sum of:
0.068394594 = weight(_text_:22 in 113) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.068394594 = score(doc=113,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17677537 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.050480857 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 113, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=113)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Indexer. 22(2000) no.2, S.81-83
-
Crawley, J.; Adams, C.: InfoAccess Project : comparing print, CD-ROM, and inhouse indexes (1991)
0.01
0.013678919 = product of:
0.027357837 = sum of:
0.027357837 = product of:
0.054715674 = sum of:
0.054715674 = weight(_text_:22 in 4824) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.054715674 = score(doc=4824,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17677537 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.050480857 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4824, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4824)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Describes the InfoAccess Project at the Univ of Saskatchewan Libraries which compared searching of manual and automated indexes by 22 undergraduate psychology students to determine their searching preferences by ranking 'Psychological abstracts' in 3 formats: print, CD-ROM and a locally mounted tape service called InfoAccess. Their satisfaction regarding the physical environment, equipment, and instructional aids was also recorded. Users preferred to search with CD-ROM, but found InfoAccess to be an acceptable alternative
