Search (10 results, page 1 of 1)

Taniguchi, S.: Recording evidence in bibliographic records and descriptive metadata (2005) 0.01

0.008523934 = product of:
  0.042619668 = sum of:
    0.042619668 = weight(_text_:22 in 3565) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.042619668 = score(doc=3565,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.18359412 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.052428056 = queryNorm
        0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3565, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3565)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)

Date: 18. 6.2005 13:16:22

Taniguchi, S.: Reevaluation of the 3-layered model in descriptive cataloguing (1997) 0.01

0.006920641 = product of:
  0.034603205 = sum of:
    0.034603205 = weight(_text_:1 in 91) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.034603205 = score(doc=91,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.12878966 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
          0.052428056 = queryNorm
        0.26867998 = fieldWeight in 91, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=91)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)

Source: Annals of Japan Society of Library Science. 43(1997) no.1, S.1-18

Taniguchi, S.: Expression-level bibliographic entity records : a trial on creation from pre-existing MARC records (2004) 0.00

0.004893632 = product of:
  0.02446816 = sum of:
    0.02446816 = weight(_text_:1 in 5658) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.02446816 = score(doc=5658,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.12878966 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
          0.052428056 = queryNorm
        0.18998542 = fieldWeight in 5658, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5658)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)

Date: 1. 8.2006 19:08:45

Taniguchi, S.: User tasks in the RDA-based model (2013) 0.00
```
0.004893632 = product of:
  0.02446816 = sum of:
    0.02446816 = weight(_text_:1 in 1956) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.02446816 = score(doc=1956,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.12878966 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
          0.052428056 = queryNorm
        0.18998542 = fieldWeight in 1956, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1956)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
```
Abstract

I examine user tasks and their related issues in the model that reflects Resource Description and Access (RDA) directly, which complements prior studies that dealt mainly with entities and their attributes and relationships. First, the definitions of user tasks in Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records (FRBR), Functional Requirements for Authority Data (FRAD), and RDA, respectively, are reviewed. Then, mappings between attributes and relationships of the RDA entities to the user tasks are proposed for the RDA-based model; the mapping covering Group 1 and 2 entities, and that for the other entities. The resultant RDA mappings and those shown in FRBR and FRAD are compared, which reveals the superiority of the former mappings.

Taniguchi, S.: Modeling resource description tasks in RDA (2015) 0.00

0.004893632 = product of:
  0.02446816 = sum of:
    0.02446816 = weight(_text_:1 in 2013) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.02446816 = score(doc=2013,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.12878966 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
          0.052428056 = queryNorm
        0.18998542 = fieldWeight in 2013, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2013)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)

Source: Cataloging and classification quarterly. 53(2015) no.1, S.88-111

Taniguchi, S.: Is BIBFRAME 2.0 a suitable schema for exchanging and sharing diverse descriptive metadata about bibliographic resources? (2018) 0.00

0.004893632 = product of:
  0.02446816 = sum of:
    0.02446816 = weight(_text_:1 in 5165) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.02446816 = score(doc=5165,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.12878966 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
          0.052428056 = queryNorm
        0.18998542 = fieldWeight in 5165, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5165)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)

Source: Cataloging and classification quarterly. 56(2018) no.1, S.40-61

Taniguchi, S.: Data provenance and administrative information in library linked data : reviewing RDA in RDF, BIBFRAME, and Wikidata (2024) 0.00

0.004893632 = product of:
  0.02446816 = sum of:
    0.02446816 = weight(_text_:1 in 1154) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.02446816 = score(doc=1154,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.12878966 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
          0.052428056 = queryNorm
        0.18998542 = fieldWeight in 1154, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1154)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)

Source: Cataloging and classification quarterly. 61(2023) no.1, p.67-906

Taniguchi, S.: ¬A system for analyzing cataloguing rules : a feasibility study (1996) 0.00
```
0.0034954515 = product of:
  0.017477257 = sum of:
    0.017477257 = weight(_text_:1 in 4198) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.017477257 = score(doc=4198,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.12878966 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
          0.052428056 = queryNorm
        0.13570388 = fieldWeight in 4198, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4198)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
```
Abstract

The quality control of cataloging standards is as important as the quality control of bibliographic records. In order to aid the quality control of cataloging standards, a prototype system to analyze the ambiguity and complexity of cataloging rules was developed. Before developing the system, a standard rule unit was defined and a simple, function-like format was devised to indicate the syntactic structure of each unit rule. The AACR2 chapter 1 rules were then manually transformed into this function-like, unit role format. The systems reads the manually transformed unit rules and puts them into their basic forms based on their syntactic components. The system then applies rule-templates, which are skeletal schemata for specific types of cataloging rules, to the converted rules. As a result of this rule-template application, the internal structure of each unit rule is determined. The system is also used to explore inter-rule relationships. That is, the system determines whether two rules have an exclusive, parallel, complementary, or non-relationship. These relationships are based on the analysis of the structural parts described above in terms of the given rule-template. To assists in this process, the system applies external knowledge represented in the same fashion as the rule units themselves. Although the prototype system can handle only a restricted range of rules, the proposed approach is positively validated and shown to be useful. However, it is possibly impractical to build a complete rule-analyzing system of this type at this stage
Taniguchi, S.: Design of cataloging rules using conceptual modeling of cataloging process (2004) 0.00
```
0.0034954515 = product of:
  0.017477257 = sum of:
    0.017477257 = weight(_text_:1 in 2264) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.017477257 = score(doc=2264,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.12878966 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
          0.052428056 = queryNorm
        0.13570388 = fieldWeight in 2264, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2264)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
```
Abstract

This article proposes a method to design cataloging rules by utilizing conceptual modeling of the cataloging process and also by applying the concept "orientedness." It also proposes a general model for the cataloging process at the conceptual level, which is independent of any situation/system or cataloging code. A design method is made up of the following phases, including the development of a general model. Functional and non-functional requirements are first specified by use of orientedness. Also, cataloger tasks are defined, which are constituents of the cataloging process. Second, a core model is built, which consists of (1) basic event patterns under each task, (2) action patterns applicable to each event, and (3) orientedness involved in an event-action pair. Third, the core model is propagated to reflect the characteristics of an individual data element and also a certain class of materials. Finally, the propagated model is defined by choosing pairs of event and action patterns in the model white referring to orientedness indicated in each event-action pair, in order to match a particular situation. As a result, a set of event-action pairs reflecting specific requirements through categories of orientedness is obtained, and consistent and scalable design can, therefore, be attained.
Taniguchi, S.: ¬A system for supporting evidence recording in bibliographic records (2006) 0.00
```
0.0034954515 = product of:
  0.017477257 = sum of:
    0.017477257 = weight(_text_:1 in 282) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.017477257 = score(doc=282,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.12878966 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
          0.052428056 = queryNorm
        0.13570388 = fieldWeight in 282, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=282)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
```
Abstract

Recording evidence for data values, in addition to the values themselves, in bibliographic records and descriptive metadata has been proposed in a previous study. Recorded evidence indicates why and how data values are recorded for elements. As a continuation of that study, this article first proposes a scenario in which a cataloger and a system interact with each other in recording evidence in bibliographic records for books, with the aim of minimizing costs and effort in recording evidence. Second, it reports on prototype system development in accordance with the scenario. The system (1) searches a string, corresponding to the data value entered by a cataloger or extracted from the Machine Readable Cataloging (MARC) record, within the scanned and optical character recognition (OCR)-converted title page and verso of the title page of an item being cataloged; (2) identifies the place where the string appears within the source of information; (3) identifies the procedure being used to form the value entered or recorded; and finally (4) displays the place and procedure identified for the data value as its candidate evidence. Third, this study reports on an experiment conducted to examine the system's performance. The results of the experiment show the usefulness of the system and the validity of the proposed scenario.

Search (10 results, page 1 of 1)

Years

Languages

Themes