Search (10 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Beall, J."
  1. Beall, J.: French Dewey : Potential influence on development of the DDC (1998) 0.01
    0.013277213 = product of:
      0.06638607 = sum of:
        0.06638607 = weight(_text_:21 in 3482) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06638607 = score(doc=3482,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16162895 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.0979297 = idf(docFreq=5425, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052173212 = queryNorm
            0.41073132 = fieldWeight in 3482, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.0979297 = idf(docFreq=5425, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3482)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Object
    DDC-21
  2. Beall, J.: Representation DDC system in MARC 21 (2008) 0.01
    0.011498406 = product of:
      0.057492025 = sum of:
        0.057492025 = weight(_text_:21 in 2167) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.057492025 = score(doc=2167,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.16162895 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.0979297 = idf(docFreq=5425, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052173212 = queryNorm
            0.35570377 = fieldWeight in 2167, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              3.0979297 = idf(docFreq=5425, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2167)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Abstract
    Magda Heiner-Freiling argued for assignment of extra DDC numbers for improved access, including table numbers and other parts of numbers as well as fully built numbers, and for coding to identify component parts of built numbers. Changes to the MARC 21 Bibliographic format that support her approach are found in MARC Proposal No. 2008-01 Representation of the Dewey Decimal Classification (DDC) System in MARC 21 formats. The new 083 Additional Dewey Decimal Classification Number field is used for assignment of extra Dewey numbers for improved access. The new 085 Synthesized Classification Number Components field is used to identify component parts of built Dewey numbers. This paper uses specific examples to show how the new fields can help improve access.
  3. Vizine-Goetz, D.; Beall, J.: Using literary warrant to define a version of the DDC for automated classification services (2004) 0.01
    0.00989625 = product of:
      0.04948125 = sum of:
        0.04948125 = weight(_text_:22 in 2645) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04948125 = score(doc=2645,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1827017 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052173212 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2645, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2645)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Object
    DDC-22
  4. Beall, J.; Kafadar, K.: ¬The effectiveness of copy cotaloging at eliminating typographical errors in shared bibliographic records (2004) 0.01
    0.00989625 = product of:
      0.04948125 = sum of:
        0.04948125 = weight(_text_:22 in 4849) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04948125 = score(doc=4849,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1827017 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052173212 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 4849, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4849)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  5. Beall, J.: Dewey for Windows (1997) 0.01
    0.009388409 = product of:
      0.04694204 = sum of:
        0.04694204 = weight(_text_:21 in 9) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04694204 = score(doc=9,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.16162895 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.0979297 = idf(docFreq=5425, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052173212 = queryNorm
            0.2904309 = fieldWeight in 9, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.0979297 = idf(docFreq=5425, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=9)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Abstract
    Dewey for Windows (DFW) provides a Windows interface for the Dewey Decimal Classification (DDC). The DFW interface is different from the DOS version of Electronic Dewey, but the search engine (database access program) is similar . This paper does not attempt to survey all the features of DFW; it focuses on those features that seem most important to the working classifier. It describes the hierarchies and the extra terminology for searching added to the DDC 21 database, search strategies, the limited number of built numbers in the database, and the need for number building. This paper also includes detailed descriptions of sample searches that illustrate how the system works.
    Source
    Dewey Decimal Classification: Edition 21 and International perspectives: papers from a workshop presented at the General Conference of the International Deferation of Library Associations and Institutions (IFLA), Beijing, China, August 29, 1996. Ed.: L.M. Chan and J.S. Mitchell
  6. Beall, J.: Indexing form and genre terms in a large academic library OPAC : the Harvard experience (1999) 0.01
    0.008851476 = product of:
      0.04425738 = sum of:
        0.04425738 = weight(_text_:21 in 5017) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04425738 = score(doc=5017,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16162895 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.0979297 = idf(docFreq=5425, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052173212 = queryNorm
            0.27382088 = fieldWeight in 5017, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.0979297 = idf(docFreq=5425, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5017)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Date
    21. 8.2000 11:54:50
  7. Beall, J.: Publishers' errors make catalogers [sic] : an analysis of the error indicators [sic] and [i.e.] in cataloging (2001) 0.01
    0.008851476 = product of:
      0.04425738 = sum of:
        0.04425738 = weight(_text_:21 in 5426) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04425738 = score(doc=5426,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16162895 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.0979297 = idf(docFreq=5425, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052173212 = queryNorm
            0.27382088 = fieldWeight in 5426, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.0979297 = idf(docFreq=5425, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5426)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Date
    5. 6.2001 12:21:28
  8. Beall, J.: Cataloging World Wide Web sites consisting mainly of links (1997) 0.01
    0.007745042 = product of:
      0.03872521 = sum of:
        0.03872521 = weight(_text_:21 in 3408) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03872521 = score(doc=3408,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16162895 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.0979297 = idf(docFreq=5425, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052173212 = queryNorm
            0.23959327 = fieldWeight in 3408, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.0979297 = idf(docFreq=5425, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3408)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Date
    21. 3.1998 13:17:50
  9. Beall, J.: Approaches to expansions : case studies from the German and Vietnamese translations (2003) 0.01
    0.0070687504 = product of:
      0.03534375 = sum of:
        0.03534375 = weight(_text_:22 in 1748) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03534375 = score(doc=1748,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1827017 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052173212 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1748, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1748)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Object
    DDC-22
  10. Beall, J.; Mitchell, J.S.: History of the representation of the DDC in the MARC Classification Format (2010) 0.01
    0.0055321725 = product of:
      0.027660862 = sum of:
        0.027660862 = weight(_text_:21 in 3568) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.027660862 = score(doc=3568,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16162895 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.0979297 = idf(docFreq=5425, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052173212 = queryNorm
            0.17113805 = fieldWeight in 3568, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.0979297 = idf(docFreq=5425, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3568)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Abstract
    This article explores the history of the representation of the Dewey Decimal Classification (DDC) in the Machine Readable Cataloging (MARC) formats, with a special emphasis on the development of the MARC classification format. Until 2009, the format used to represent the DDC has been a proprietary one that predated the development of the MARC classification format. The need to replace the current editorial support system, the desire to deliver DDC data in a variety of formats to support different uses, and the increasingly global context of editorial work with translation partners around the world prompted the Dewey editorial team, along with OCLC research and development colleagues, to rethink the underlying representation of the DDC and choose the MARC 21 formats for classification and authority data. The discussion is framed with quotes from the writings of Nancy J. Williamson, whose analysis of the content of the Library of Congress Classification (LCC) schedules played a key role in shaping the original MARC classification format.