Search (96 results, page 1 of 5)

  • × language_ss:"e"
  • × theme_ss:"Datenformate"
  1. Yee, M.M.: New perspectives on the shared cataloging environment and a MARC 21 shopping list (2004) 0.06 
    0.062205013 = product of:
  0.15551253 = sum of:
    0.09896252 = weight(_text_:21 in 132) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.09896252 = score(doc=132,freq=10.0), product of:
        0.16162895 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.0979297 = idf(docFreq=5425, maxDocs=44218)
          0.052173212 = queryNorm
        0.61228216 = fieldWeight in 132, product of:
          3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
            10.0 = termFreq=10.0
          3.0979297 = idf(docFreq=5425, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=132)
    0.056550004 = weight(_text_:22 in 132) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.056550004 = score(doc=132,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.1827017 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.052173212 = queryNorm
        0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 132, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=132)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Abstract
    This paper surveys the cataloging literature to collect problems that have been identified with the MARC 21 format. The problems are sorted into (1) problems that are not the fault of MARC 21; (2) problems that perhaps are not problems at all; (3) problems that are connected with the current shared cataloging environment; and 4) other problems with MARC 21 and vendor implementation of it. The author makes recommendations to deal with the true MARC 21 problems that remain after this analysis.
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  2. El-Sherbini, M.: Metadata and the future of cataloging (2001) 0.05 
    0.053282417 = product of:
  0.13320604 = sum of:
    0.076656036 = weight(_text_:21 in 751) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.076656036 = score(doc=751,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.16162895 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.0979297 = idf(docFreq=5425, maxDocs=44218)
          0.052173212 = queryNorm
        0.4742717 = fieldWeight in 751, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          3.0979297 = idf(docFreq=5425, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=751)
    0.056550004 = weight(_text_:22 in 751) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.056550004 = score(doc=751,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.1827017 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.052173212 = queryNorm
        0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 751, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=751)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Abstract
    This article is a survey of representative metadata efforts comparing them to MARC 21 metadata in order to determine if new electronic formats require the development of a new set of standards. This study surveys the ongoing metadata projects in order to identify what types of metadata exist and how they are used and also compares and analyzes selected metadata elements in an attempt to illustrate how they are related to MARC 21 metadata format elements.
    Date
    23. 1.2007 11:22:30
    Object
    MARC 21
  3. Bourne, R.: MARC harmonization : progress and problems (1997) 0.04 
    0.040322956 = product of:
  0.10080738 = sum of:
    0.04425738 = weight(_text_:21 in 873) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.04425738 = score(doc=873,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.16162895 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.0979297 = idf(docFreq=5425, maxDocs=44218)
          0.052173212 = queryNorm
        0.27382088 = fieldWeight in 873, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.0979297 = idf(docFreq=5425, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=873)
    0.056550004 = weight(_text_:22 in 873) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.056550004 = score(doc=873,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.1827017 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.052173212 = queryNorm
        0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 873, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=873)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Date
    27.10.1997 21:08:20
    Source
    LASER link. 1997, Spring/Summer, S.22-24
  4. Coyle, K.: Future considerations : the functional library systems record (2004) 0.04 
    0.040322956 = product of:
  0.10080738 = sum of:
    0.04425738 = weight(_text_:21 in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.04425738 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.16162895 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.0979297 = idf(docFreq=5425, maxDocs=44218)
          0.052173212 = queryNorm
        0.27382088 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.0979297 = idf(docFreq=5425, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
    0.056550004 = weight(_text_:22 in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.056550004 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.1827017 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.052173212 = queryNorm
        0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Date
    9.12.2005 19:21:29
    Source
    Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.2, S.166-174
  5. Riva, P.: Mapping MARC 21 linking entry fields to FRBR and Tillett's taxonomy of bibliographic relationships (2004) 0.04 
    0.03996181 = product of:
  0.09990452 = sum of:
    0.057492025 = weight(_text_:21 in 136) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.057492025 = score(doc=136,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.16162895 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.0979297 = idf(docFreq=5425, maxDocs=44218)
          0.052173212 = queryNorm
        0.35570377 = fieldWeight in 136, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          3.0979297 = idf(docFreq=5425, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=136)
    0.0424125 = weight(_text_:22 in 136) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0424125 = score(doc=136,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.1827017 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.052173212 = queryNorm
        0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 136, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=136)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Abstract
    Bibliographic relationships have taken on even greater importance in the context of ongoing efforts to integrate concepts from the Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records (FRBR) into cataloging codes and database structures. In MARC 21, the linking entry fields are a major mechanism for expressing relationships between bibliographic records. Taxonomies of bibliographic relationships have been proposed by Tillett, with an extension by Smiraglia, and in FRBR itself. The present exercise is to provide a detailed bidirectional mapping of the MARC 21 linking fields to these two schemes. The correspondence of the Tillett taxonomic divisions to the MARC categorization of the linking fields as chronological, horizontal, or vertical is examined as well. Application of the findings to MARC format development and system functionality is discussed.
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  6. Keith, C.: Using XSLT to manipulate MARC metadata (2004) 0.04 
    0.035741817 = product of:
  0.089354545 = sum of:
    0.04694204 = weight(_text_:21 in 4747) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.04694204 = score(doc=4747,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.16162895 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.0979297 = idf(docFreq=5425, maxDocs=44218)
          0.052173212 = queryNorm
        0.2904309 = fieldWeight in 4747, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.0979297 = idf(docFreq=5425, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4747)
    0.0424125 = weight(_text_:22 in 4747) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0424125 = score(doc=4747,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.1827017 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.052173212 = queryNorm
        0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4747, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4747)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Abstract
    This paper describes the MARCXML architecture implemented at the Library of Congress. It gives an overview of the component pieces of the architecture, including the MARCXML schema and the MARCXML toolkit, while giving a brief tutorial on their use. Several different applications of the architecture and tools are discussed to illustrate the features of the toolkit being developed thus far. Nearly any metadata format can take advantage of the features of the toolkit, and the process of the toolkit enabling a new format is discussed. Finally, this paper intends to foster new ideas with regards to the transformation of descriptive metadata, especially using XML tools. In this paper the following conventions will be used: MARC21 will refer to MARC 21 records in the ISO 2709 record structure used today; MARCXML will refer to MARC 21 records in an XML structure.
    Source
    Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.2, S.122-130
  7. UNIMARC and CDS/ISIS : Proceedings of the Workshops held in Budapest, 21.-22. June 1993 and Barcelona, 26. August 1993 (1994) 0.04 
    0.035282582 = product of:
  0.088206455 = sum of:
    0.03872521 = weight(_text_:21 in 8779) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.03872521 = score(doc=8779,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.16162895 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.0979297 = idf(docFreq=5425, maxDocs=44218)
          0.052173212 = queryNorm
        0.23959327 = fieldWeight in 8779, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.0979297 = idf(docFreq=5425, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=8779)
    0.04948125 = weight(_text_:22 in 8779) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.04948125 = score(doc=8779,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.1827017 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.052173212 = queryNorm
        0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 8779, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=8779)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
  8. McCallum, S.H.: Machine Readable Cataloging (MARC): 1975-2007 (2009) 0.03 
    0.030242214 = product of:
  0.075605534 = sum of:
    0.033193033 = weight(_text_:21 in 3841) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.033193033 = score(doc=3841,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.16162895 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.0979297 = idf(docFreq=5425, maxDocs=44218)
          0.052173212 = queryNorm
        0.20536566 = fieldWeight in 3841, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.0979297 = idf(docFreq=5425, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3841)
    0.0424125 = weight(_text_:22 in 3841) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0424125 = score(doc=3841,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.1827017 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.052173212 = queryNorm
        0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3841, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3841)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Abstract
    This entry describes the development of the MARC Communications format. After a brief overview of the initial 10 years it describes the succeeding phases of development up to the present. This takes the reader through the expansion of the format for all types of bibliographic data and for a multiple character scripts. At the same time a large business community was developing that offered products based on the format to the library community. The introduction of the Internet in the 1990s and the Web technology brought new opportunities and challenges and the format was adapted to this new environment. There has been a great deal of international adoption of the format that has continued into the 2000s. More recently new syntaxes for MARC 21 and models are being explored.
    Date
    27. 8.2011 14:22:38
  9. MARC and metadata : METS, MODS, and MARCXML: current and future implications (2004) 0.02 
    0.022620002 = product of:
  0.11310001 = sum of:
    0.11310001 = weight(_text_:22 in 2840) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.11310001 = score(doc=2840,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.1827017 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.052173212 = queryNorm
        0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 2840, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=2840)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Source
    Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.1
  10. Chkhenkeli, T.; Garibashvili, I.: Implementation of the UNIMARC format in Georgian libraries (1998) 0.02 
    0.021906286 = product of:
  0.10953143 = sum of:
    0.10953143 = weight(_text_:21 in 2116) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.10953143 = score(doc=2116,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.16162895 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.0979297 = idf(docFreq=5425, maxDocs=44218)
          0.052173212 = queryNorm
        0.67767215 = fieldWeight in 2116, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.0979297 = idf(docFreq=5425, maxDocs=44218)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=2116)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Date
    1. 7.1996 21:26:02
    Source
    International cataloguing and bibliographic control. 27(1998) no.1, S.21-23
  11. Hopkinson, A.: Traditional communication formats : MARC is far from dead (1999) 0.02 
    0.021906286 = product of:
  0.10953143 = sum of:
    0.10953143 = weight(_text_:21 in 4484) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.10953143 = score(doc=4484,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.16162895 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.0979297 = idf(docFreq=5425, maxDocs=44218)
          0.052173212 = queryNorm
        0.67767215 = fieldWeight in 4484, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.0979297 = idf(docFreq=5425, maxDocs=44218)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4484)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Date
    1. 7.1996 21:26:02
    Source
    International cataloguing and bibliographic control. 28(1999) no.1, S.17-21
  12. Willer, M.: UNIMARC/Authorities (1999) 0.02 
    0.021906286 = product of:
  0.10953143 = sum of:
    0.10953143 = weight(_text_:21 in 6076) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.10953143 = score(doc=6076,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.16162895 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.0979297 = idf(docFreq=5425, maxDocs=44218)
          0.052173212 = queryNorm
        0.67767215 = fieldWeight in 6076, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.0979297 = idf(docFreq=5425, maxDocs=44218)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6076)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Date
    1. 7.1996 21:26:02
    2. 8.2001 16:21:16
  13. MARC and metadata : METS, MODS, and MARCXML: current and future implications (2004) 0.02 
    0.0197925 = product of:
  0.0989625 = sum of:
    0.0989625 = weight(_text_:22 in 7196) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0989625 = score(doc=7196,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.1827017 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.052173212 = queryNorm
        0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 7196, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=7196)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Source
    Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.1
  14. MARC and metadata : METS, MODS, and MARCXML: current and future implications part 2 (2004) 0.02 
    0.0197925 = product of:
  0.0989625 = sum of:
    0.0989625 = weight(_text_:22 in 2841) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0989625 = score(doc=2841,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.1827017 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.052173212 = queryNorm
        0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 2841, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=2841)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Source
    Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.2
  15. Oehlschläger, S.: International Workshop MARC 21 (2007) 0.02 
    0.017702952 = product of:
  0.08851476 = sum of:
    0.08851476 = weight(_text_:21 in 2861) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.08851476 = score(doc=2861,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.16162895 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.0979297 = idf(docFreq=5425, maxDocs=44218)
          0.052173212 = queryNorm
        0.54764175 = fieldWeight in 2861, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.0979297 = idf(docFreq=5425, maxDocs=44218)
          0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=2861)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
  16. Oehlschläger, S.: Umstieg auf MARC21 (2007) 0.02 
    0.017494267 = product of:
  0.087471336 = sum of:
    0.087471336 = weight(_text_:21 in 555) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.087471336 = score(doc=555,freq=20.0), product of:
        0.16162895 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.0979297 = idf(docFreq=5425, maxDocs=44218)
          0.052173212 = queryNorm
        0.5411861 = fieldWeight in 555, product of:
          4.472136 = tf(freq=20.0), with freq of:
            20.0 = termFreq=20.0
          3.0979297 = idf(docFreq=5425, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=555)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Content
    "Als einen ersten Meilenstein sehen die im Dezember 2004 vom Standardisierungsausschuss gefassten Beschlüsse zur Internationalisierung der deutschen Standards die Einführung und einheitliche Anwendung von MARC 21 als Austauschformat für alle Bibliotheken in Deutschland und Österreich vor. Die Deutsche Nationalbibliothek und die Expertengruppe Datenformate wurden mit der Vorbereitung des Umstiegs auf MARC 21 beauftragt. Das Projekt Formatumstieg auf MARC 21 wird durch die Andrew W. Mellon Foundation und die Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) gefördert. Die Umsetzung von vorbereitenden Arbeitspaketen, wie etwa einer Konkordanz MAB2 - MARC 21, Reisen im Rahmen von Schulungen, Workshops und Kongressen von deutschen Experten nach USA sowie von amerikanischen Experten nach Deutschland und einer Machbarkeitsstudie für ein Editionssystem, werden von der Mellon Foundation ermöglicht. Aus Mitteln der DFG konnten weitergehende Arbeitspakete, zu denen die Entwicklung eines Editionssystems, die Übersetzung von MARC Concise ins Deutsche und eine Untersuchung zu MARCXML gehören, bereits initiiert werden. Außerdem konnte im Juni letzten Jahres eine Projektstelle zur Koordination des Umstiegs vom deutschen Datenaustauschformat MAB2 auf das international angewandte Format MARC 21 im deutschsprachigen Raum mit Kerstin Helmkamp besetzt werden.
    Kernelement des Umstiegs ist die Entwicklung einer verbindlichen Gesamt-Konkordanz von MAB2 nach MARC 21. Im Jahr 2005 beschäftigte sich die Expertengruppe Datenformate eingehend mit dem Zielformat MARC 21 und dem zugrunde liegenden Datenmodell. Ins Zentrum der Aufmerksamkeit rückten die Analyse und Bewertung von Unterschieden zwischen MAB2 und MARC 21 und die Suche nach Lösungen, damit die vorhandenen Daten möglichst ohne Verlust transportiert werden können. Ein wesentlicher Punkt war dabei das Mapping mehrbändiger Werke, die in MAB2 anders abgebildet werden als in MARC 21. Die Festlegungen der Expertengruppe Datenformate zur Abbildung von mehrbändigen begrenzten Werken in MARC 21 mit Beispielen sind bereits im Dezember auf der Homepage der Deutschen Nationalbibliothek veröffentlicht worden."
  17. Byrne, D.J.: MARC manual : understanding and using MARC records (1998) 0.02 
    0.016965 = product of:
  0.084825 = sum of:
    0.084825 = weight(_text_:22 in 6077) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.084825 = score(doc=6077,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.1827017 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.052173212 = queryNorm
        0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 6077, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6077)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Date
    2. 8.2001 16:22:33
  18. Caplan, P.; Guenther, R.: Metadata for Internet resources : the Dublin Core Metadata Elements Set and its mapping to USMARC (1996) 0.02 
    0.015994756 = product of:
  0.07997378 = sum of:
    0.07997378 = weight(_text_:22 in 2408) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.07997378 = score(doc=2408,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.1827017 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.052173212 = queryNorm
        0.4377287 = fieldWeight in 2408, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2408)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Date
    13. 1.2007 18:31:22
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 22(1996) nos.3/4, S.43-58
  19. Tennant, R.: ¬A bibliographic metadata infrastructure for the twenty-first century (2004) 0.02 
    0.015994756 = product of:
  0.07997378 = sum of:
    0.07997378 = weight(_text_:22 in 2845) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.07997378 = score(doc=2845,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.1827017 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.052173212 = queryNorm
        0.4377287 = fieldWeight in 2845, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2845)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Date
    9.12.2005 19:22:38
    Source
    Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.2, S.175-181
  20. CCF/F: The Common Communication Format for factual information (1992) 0.02 
    0.015490084 = product of:
  0.07745042 = sum of:
    0.07745042 = weight(_text_:21 in 2269) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.07745042 = score(doc=2269,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.16162895 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.0979297 = idf(docFreq=5425, maxDocs=44218)
          0.052173212 = queryNorm
        0.47918653 = fieldWeight in 2269, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.0979297 = idf(docFreq=5425, maxDocs=44218)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=2269)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Date
    19.11.1998 21:05:34

Authors

Years

Types

  • a 83
  • m 6
  • s 6
  • b 2
  • el 2
  • More… Less…

Themes