Search (44 results, page 1 of 3)

  • × theme_ss:"Retrievalstudien"
  1. Blagden, J.F.: How much noise in a role-free and link-free co-ordinate indexing system? (1966) 0.06 
    0.06400573 = product of:
  0.16001433 = sum of:
    0.111752436 = weight(_text_:link in 2718) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.111752436 = score(doc=2718,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.2711644 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.3287 = idf(docFreq=582, maxDocs=44218)
          0.05088753 = queryNorm
        0.4121206 = fieldWeight in 2718, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.3287 = idf(docFreq=582, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2718)
    0.048261903 = weight(_text_:22 in 2718) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.048261903 = score(doc=2718,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.17819946 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.05088753 = queryNorm
        0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2718, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2718)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Source
    Journal of documentation. 22(1966), S.203-209
  2. Feldman, S.: Testing natural language : comparing DIALOG, TARGET, and DR-LINK (1996) 0.04 
    0.044242494 = product of:
  0.22121246 = sum of:
    0.22121246 = weight(_text_:link in 7463) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.22121246 = score(doc=7463,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.2711644 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.3287 = idf(docFreq=582, maxDocs=44218)
          0.05088753 = queryNorm
        0.8157873 = fieldWeight in 7463, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          5.3287 = idf(docFreq=582, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7463)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Abstract
    Compares online searching of DIALOG (a traditional Boolean system), TARGET (a relevance ranking system) and DR-LINK (an advanced intelligent text processing system), in order to establish the differing strengths of traditional and natural language processing search systems. Details example search queries used in comparison and how each of the systems performed. Considers the implications of the findings for professional information searchers and end users. Natural language processing systems are useful because they develop an wider understanding of queries that use of traditional systems may not
    Object
    DR-LINK
  3. Fraser, L.; Locatis, C.: Effects of link annotations on search performance in layered and unlayered hierarchically organized information spaces (2001) 0.04 
    0.039105207 = product of:
  0.19552603 = sum of:
    0.19552603 = weight(_text_:link in 6937) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.19552603 = score(doc=6937,freq=12.0), product of:
        0.2711644 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.3287 = idf(docFreq=582, maxDocs=44218)
          0.05088753 = queryNorm
        0.7210609 = fieldWeight in 6937, product of:
          3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
            12.0 = termFreq=12.0
          5.3287 = idf(docFreq=582, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=6937)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Abstract
    The effects of link annotations on user search performance in hypertext environments having deep (layered) and shallow link structures were investigated in this study. Four environments were tested-layered-annotated, layered-unannotated, shallow-annotated, and shallow-unannotated. A single document was divided into 48 sections, and layered and unlayered versions were created. Additional versions were created by adding annotations to the links in the layered and unlayered versions. Subjects were given three queries of varying difficulty and then asked to find the answers to the queries that were contained within the hypertext environment to which they were randomly assigned. Correspondence between the wording links and queries was used to define difficulty level. The results of the study confirmed previous research that shallow link structures are better than deep (layered) link structures. Annotations had virtually no effect on the search performance of the subjects. The subjects performed similarly in the annotated and unannotated environments, regardless of whether the link structures were shallow or deep. An analysis of question difficulty suggests that the wording in links has primacy over the wording in annotations in influencing user search behavior.
  4. Khan, K.; Locatis, C.: Searching through cyberspace : the effects of link display and link density on information retrieval from hypertext on the World Wide Web (1998) 0.04 
    0.03831512 = product of:
  0.1915756 = sum of:
    0.1915756 = weight(_text_:link in 446) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.1915756 = score(doc=446,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.2711644 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.3287 = idf(docFreq=582, maxDocs=44218)
          0.05088753 = queryNorm
        0.7064925 = fieldWeight in 446, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          5.3287 = idf(docFreq=582, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=446)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Abstract
    This study investigated information retrieval from hypertext on the WWW. Significant main and interaction effects were found for both link density (number of links per display) and display format (in paragraphs or lists) on search performance. Low link densities displayed in list format produced the best overall results, in terms of search accuracy, search time, number of links explored, and search task prioritization. Lower densities affected user ability to prioritize search tasks and produced more accurate searches, while list displays positively affected all aspects of searching except task prioritization. The performance of novices and experts, in terms of their previous experience browsing hypertext on the WWW, was compared. Experts performed better, mostly because of their superior task prioritization
  5. Hofmann, M.: TREC Konferenzbericht (7.10.93) (1995) 0.03 
    0.025543412 = product of:
  0.12771706 = sum of:
    0.12771706 = weight(_text_:link in 5005) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.12771706 = score(doc=5005,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.2711644 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.3287 = idf(docFreq=582, maxDocs=44218)
          0.05088753 = queryNorm
        0.47099498 = fieldWeight in 5005, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.3287 = idf(docFreq=582, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5005)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Source
    http://www.inf-wiss.uni-konstanz.de/IW/HT-Link/assfalg:15:Feb:95:4:44:26pm.html
  6. Gillman, P.: Text retrieval (1998) 0.03 
    0.025543412 = product of:
  0.12771706 = sum of:
    0.12771706 = weight(_text_:link in 1502) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.12771706 = score(doc=1502,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.2711644 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.3287 = idf(docFreq=582, maxDocs=44218)
          0.05088753 = queryNorm
        0.47099498 = fieldWeight in 1502, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.3287 = idf(docFreq=582, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1502)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Source
    IT link. 10(1998) no.6, S.10-12
  7. Wilkes, A.; Nelson, A.: Subject searching in two online catalogs : authority control vs. non authority control (1995) 0.02 
    0.022350488 = product of:
  0.111752436 = sum of:
    0.111752436 = weight(_text_:link in 4450) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.111752436 = score(doc=4450,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.2711644 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.3287 = idf(docFreq=582, maxDocs=44218)
          0.05088753 = queryNorm
        0.4121206 = fieldWeight in 4450, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.3287 = idf(docFreq=582, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4450)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Abstract
    Compares the results of subject searching in 2 online catalogue systems, one system with authority control, the other without. Transaction logs from Library A (no authority control) were analyzed to identify searching patterns of users; 885 searches were attempted, 351 (39,7%) by subject. 142 (40,6%) of these subject searches were unsuccessful. Identical searches were performed in a comparable library that has authority control, Library B. Terms identified in 'see' references at Library B were searched in Library A. 105 (73,9%) of the searches that appeared to fail would have retrievd at least one, and usually many, records if a link had been provided between the term chosen by the user and the term used by the system
  8. Fuhr, N.; Niewelt, B.: ¬Ein Retrievaltest mit automatisch indexierten Dokumenten (1984) 0.02 
    0.019304762 = product of:
  0.09652381 = sum of:
    0.09652381 = weight(_text_:22 in 262) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.09652381 = score(doc=262,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.17819946 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.05088753 = queryNorm
        0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 262, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=262)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Date
    20.10.2000 12:22:23
  9. Tomaiuolo, N.G.; Parker, J.: Maximizing relevant retrieval : keyword and natural language searching (1998) 0.02 
    0.019304762 = product of:
  0.09652381 = sum of:
    0.09652381 = weight(_text_:22 in 6418) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.09652381 = score(doc=6418,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.17819946 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.05088753 = queryNorm
        0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 6418, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6418)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Source
    Online. 22(1998) no.6, S.57-58
  10. Voorhees, E.M.; Harman, D.: Overview of the Sixth Text REtrieval Conference (TREC-6) (2000) 0.02 
    0.019304762 = product of:
  0.09652381 = sum of:
    0.09652381 = weight(_text_:22 in 6438) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.09652381 = score(doc=6438,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.17819946 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.05088753 = queryNorm
        0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 6438, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6438)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Date
    11. 8.2001 16:22:19
  11. Dalrymple, P.W.: Retrieval by reformulation in two library catalogs : toward a cognitive model of searching behavior (1990) 0.02 
    0.019304762 = product of:
  0.09652381 = sum of:
    0.09652381 = weight(_text_:22 in 5089) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.09652381 = score(doc=5089,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.17819946 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.05088753 = queryNorm
        0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 5089, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=5089)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Date
    22. 7.2006 18:43:54
  12. MacFarlane, A.: Evaluation of web search for the information practitioner (2007) 0.02 
    0.01915756 = product of:
  0.0957878 = sum of:
    0.0957878 = weight(_text_:link in 817) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0957878 = score(doc=817,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.2711644 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.3287 = idf(docFreq=582, maxDocs=44218)
          0.05088753 = queryNorm
        0.35324624 = fieldWeight in 817, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.3287 = idf(docFreq=582, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=817)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Abstract
    Purpose - The aim of the paper is to put forward a structured mechanism for web search evaluation. The paper seeks to point to useful scientific research and show how information practitioners can use these methods in evaluation of search on the web for their users. Design/methodology/approach - The paper puts forward an approach which utilizes traditional laboratory-based evaluation measures such as average precision/precision at N documents, augmented with diagnostic measures such as link broken, etc., which are used to show why precision measures are depressed as well as the quality of the search engines crawling mechanism. Findings - The paper shows how to use diagnostic measures in conjunction with precision in order to evaluate web search. Practical implications - The methodology presented in this paper will be useful to any information professional who regularly uses web search as part of their information seeking and needs to evaluate web search services. Originality/value - The paper argues that the use of diagnostic measures is essential in web search, as precision measures on their own do not allow a searcher to understand why search results differ between search engines.
  13. Allan, J.; Callan, J.P.; Croft, W.B.; Ballesteros, L.; Broglio, J.; Xu, J.; Shu, H.: INQUERY at TREC-5 (1997) 0.01 
    0.013789116 = product of:
  0.06894558 = sum of:
    0.06894558 = weight(_text_:22 in 3103) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.06894558 = score(doc=3103,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.17819946 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.05088753 = queryNorm
        0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 3103, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3103)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Date
    27. 2.1999 20:55:22
  14. Ng, K.B.; Loewenstern, D.; Basu, C.; Hirsh, H.; Kantor, P.B.: Data fusion of machine-learning methods for the TREC5 routing tak (and other work) (1997) 0.01 
    0.013789116 = product of:
  0.06894558 = sum of:
    0.06894558 = weight(_text_:22 in 3107) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.06894558 = score(doc=3107,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.17819946 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.05088753 = queryNorm
        0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 3107, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3107)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Date
    27. 2.1999 20:59:22
  15. Saracevic, T.: On a method for studying the structure and nature of requests in information retrieval (1983) 0.01 
    0.013789116 = product of:
  0.06894558 = sum of:
    0.06894558 = weight(_text_:22 in 2417) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.06894558 = score(doc=2417,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.17819946 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.05088753 = queryNorm
        0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 2417, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2417)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Pages
    S.22-25
  16. Leiva-Mederos, A.; Senso, J.A.; Hidalgo-Delgado, Y.; Hipola, P.: Working framework of semantic interoperability for CRIS with heterogeneous data sources (2017) 0.01 
    0.012771706 = product of:
  0.06385853 = sum of:
    0.06385853 = weight(_text_:link in 3706) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.06385853 = score(doc=3706,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.2711644 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.3287 = idf(docFreq=582, maxDocs=44218)
          0.05088753 = queryNorm
        0.23549749 = fieldWeight in 3706, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.3287 = idf(docFreq=582, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3706)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Abstract
    Purpose Information from Current Research Information Systems (CRIS) is stored in different formats, in platforms that are not compatible, or even in independent networks. It would be helpful to have a well-defined methodology to allow for management data processing from a single site, so as to take advantage of the capacity to link disperse data found in different systems, platforms, sources and/or formats. Based on functionalities and materials of the VLIR project, the purpose of this paper is to present a model that provides for interoperability by means of semantic alignment techniques and metadata crosswalks, and facilitates the fusion of information stored in diverse sources. Design/methodology/approach After reviewing the state of the art regarding the diverse mechanisms for achieving semantic interoperability, the paper analyzes the following: the specific coverage of the data sets (type of data, thematic coverage and geographic coverage); the technical specifications needed to retrieve and analyze a distribution of the data set (format, protocol, etc.); the conditions of re-utilization (copyright and licenses); and the "dimensions" included in the data set as well as the semantics of these dimensions (the syntax and the taxonomies of reference). The semantic interoperability framework here presented implements semantic alignment and metadata crosswalk to convert information from three different systems (ABCD, Moodle and DSpace) to integrate all the databases in a single RDF file. Findings The paper also includes an evaluation based on the comparison - by means of calculations of recall and precision - of the proposed model and identical consultations made on Open Archives Initiative and SQL, in order to estimate its efficiency. The results have been satisfactory enough, due to the fact that the semantic interoperability facilitates the exact retrieval of information. Originality/value The proposed model enhances management of the syntactic and semantic interoperability of the CRIS system designed. In a real setting of use it achieves very positive results.
  17. Rijsbergen, C.J. van: ¬A test for the separation of relevant and non-relevant documents in experimental retrieval collections (1973) 0.01 
    0.011031292 = product of:
  0.055156462 = sum of:
    0.055156462 = weight(_text_:22 in 5002) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.055156462 = score(doc=5002,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.17819946 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.05088753 = queryNorm
        0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 5002, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5002)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Date
    19. 3.1996 11:22:12
  18. Sanderson, M.: ¬The Reuters test collection (1996) 0.01 
    0.011031292 = product of:
  0.055156462 = sum of:
    0.055156462 = weight(_text_:22 in 6971) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.055156462 = score(doc=6971,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.17819946 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.05088753 = queryNorm
        0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 6971, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6971)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Source
    Information retrieval: new systems and current research. Proceedings of the 16th Research Colloquium of the British Computer Society Information Retrieval Specialist Group, Drymen, Scotland, 22-23 Mar 94. Ed.: R. Leon
  19. Lespinasse, K.: TREC: une conference pour l'evaluation des systemes de recherche d'information (1997) 0.01 
    0.011031292 = product of:
  0.055156462 = sum of:
    0.055156462 = weight(_text_:22 in 744) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.055156462 = score(doc=744,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.17819946 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.05088753 = queryNorm
        0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 744, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=744)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Date
    1. 8.1996 22:01:00
  20. ¬The Fifth Text Retrieval Conference (TREC-5) (1997) 0.01 
    0.011031292 = product of:
  0.055156462 = sum of:
    0.055156462 = weight(_text_:22 in 3087) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.055156462 = score(doc=3087,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.17819946 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.05088753 = queryNorm
        0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3087, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3087)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Abstract
    Proceedings of the 5th TREC-confrerence held in Gaithersburgh, Maryland, Nov 20-22, 1996. Aim of the conference was discussion on retrieval techniques for large test collections. Different research groups used different techniques, such as automated thesauri, term weighting, natural language techniques, relevance feedback and advanced pattern matching, for information retrieval from the same large database. This procedure makes it possible to compare the results. The proceedings include papers, tables of the system results, and brief system descriptions including timing and storage information

Authors

Years

Languages

  • e 38
  • d 4
  • f 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 39
  • s 3
  • m 2
  • el 1
  • More… Less…

Themes