Search (20 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × theme_ss:"Social tagging"
  1. Chae, G.; Park, J.; Park, J.; Yeo, W.S.; Shi, C.: Linking and clustering artworks using social tags : revitalizing crowd-sourced information on cultural collections (2016) 0.02 
    0.022577403 = product of:
  0.11288701 = sum of:
    0.11288701 = weight(_text_:link in 2852) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.11288701 = score(doc=2852,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.2711644 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.3287 = idf(docFreq=582, maxDocs=44218)
          0.05088753 = queryNorm
        0.4163047 = fieldWeight in 2852, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          5.3287 = idf(docFreq=582, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2852)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Abstract
    Social tagging is one of the most popular methods for collecting crowd-sourced information in galleries, libraries, archives, and museums (GLAMs). However, when the number of social tags grows rapidly, using them becomes problematic and, as a result, they are often left as simply big data that cannot be used for practical purposes. To revitalize the use of this crowd-sourced information, we propose using social tags to link and cluster artworks based on an experimental study using an online collection at the Gyeonggi Museum of Modern Art (GMoMA). We view social tagging as a folksonomy, where artworks are classified by keywords of the crowd's various interpretations and one artwork can belong to several different categories simultaneously. To leverage this strength of social tags, we used a clustering method called "link communities" to detect overlapping communities in a network of artworks constructed by computing similarities between all artwork pairs. We used this framework to identify semantic relationships and clusters of similar artworks. By comparing the clustering results with curators' manual classification results, we demonstrated the potential of social tagging data for automatically clustering artworks in a way that reflects the dynamic perspectives of crowds.
  2. Shirky, C.: Ontology is overrated : categories, links, and tags (2005) 0.02 
    0.015964633 = product of:
  0.079823166 = sum of:
    0.079823166 = weight(_text_:link in 1265) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.079823166 = score(doc=1265,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.2711644 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.3287 = idf(docFreq=582, maxDocs=44218)
          0.05088753 = queryNorm
        0.29437187 = fieldWeight in 1265, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.3287 = idf(docFreq=582, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1265)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Abstract
    Today I want to talk about categorization, and I want to convince you that a lot of what we think we know about categorization is wrong. In particular, I want to convince you that many of the ways we're attempting to apply categorization to the electronic world are actually a bad fit, because we've adopted habits of mind that are left over from earlier strategies. I also want to convince you that what we're seeing when we see the Web is actually a radical break with previous categorization strategies, rather than an extension of them. The second part of the talk is more speculative, because it is often the case that old systems get broken before people know what's going to take their place. (Anyone watching the music industry can see this at work today.) That's what I think is happening with categorization. What I think is coming instead are much more organic ways of organizing information than our current categorization schemes allow, based on two units -- the link, which can point to anything, and the tag, which is a way of attaching labels to links. The strategy of tagging -- free-form labeling, without regard to categorical constraints -- seems like a recipe for disaster, but as the Web has shown us, you can extract a surprising amount of value from big messy data sets.
  3. Social tagging in a linked data environment. Edited by Diane Rasmussen Pennington and Louise F. Spiteri. London, UK: Facet Publishing, 2018. 240 pp. £74.95 (paperback). (ISBN 9781783303380) (2019) 0.02 
    0.015964633 = product of:
  0.079823166 = sum of:
    0.079823166 = weight(_text_:link in 101) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.079823166 = score(doc=101,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.2711644 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.3287 = idf(docFreq=582, maxDocs=44218)
          0.05088753 = queryNorm
        0.29437187 = fieldWeight in 101, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.3287 = idf(docFreq=582, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=101)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Abstract
    Social tagging, hashtags, and geotags are used across a variety of platforms (Twitter, Facebook, Tumblr, WordPress, Instagram) in different countries and cultures. This book, representing researchers and practitioners across different information professions, explores how social tags can link content across a variety of environments. Most studies of social tagging have tended to focus on applications like library catalogs, blogs, and social bookmarking sites. This book, in setting out a theoretical background and the use of a series of case studies, explores the role of hashtags as a form of linked data?without the complex implementation of RDF and other Semantic Web technologies.
  4. Hammond, T.; Hannay, T.; Lund, B.; Scott, J.: Social bookmarking tools (I) : a general review (2005) 0.02 
    0.01580418 = product of:
  0.0790209 = sum of:
    0.0790209 = weight(_text_:link in 1188) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0790209 = score(doc=1188,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.2711644 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.3287 = idf(docFreq=582, maxDocs=44218)
          0.05088753 = queryNorm
        0.29141328 = fieldWeight in 1188, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          5.3287 = idf(docFreq=582, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=1188)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Abstract
    Because, to paraphrase a pop music lyric from a certain rock and roll band of yesterday, "the Web is old, the Web is new, the Web is all, the Web is you", it seems like we might have to face up to some of these stark realities. With the introduction of new social software applications such as blogs, wikis, newsfeeds, social networks, and bookmarking tools (the subject of this paper), the claim that Shelley Powers makes in a Burningbird blog entry seems apposite: "This is the user's web now, which means it's my web and I can make the rules." Reinvention is revolution - it brings us always back to beginnings. We are here going to remind you of hyperlinks in all their glory, sell you on the idea of bookmarking hyperlinks, point you at other folks who are doing the same, and tell you why this is a good thing. Just as long as those hyperlinks (or let's call them plain old links) are managed, tagged, commented upon, and published onto the Web, they represent a user's own personal library placed on public record, which - when aggregated with other personal libraries - allows for rich, social networking opportunities. Why spill any ink (digital or not) in rewriting what someone else has already written about instead of just pointing at the original story and adding the merest of titles, descriptions and tags for future reference? More importantly, why not make these personal 'link playlists' available to oneself and to others from whatever browser or computer one happens to be using at the time? This paper reviews some current initiatives, as of early 2005, in providing public link management applications on the Web - utilities that are often referred to under the general moniker of 'social bookmarking tools'. There are a couple of things going on here: 1) server-side software aimed specifically at managing links with, crucially, a strong, social networking flavour, and 2) an unabashedly open and unstructured approach to tagging, or user classification, of those links.
  5. Müller-Prove, M.: Modell und Anwendungsperspektive des Social Tagging (2008) 0.01 
    0.011031292 = product of:
  0.055156462 = sum of:
    0.055156462 = weight(_text_:22 in 2882) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.055156462 = score(doc=2882,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.17819946 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.05088753 = queryNorm
        0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2882, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2882)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Pages
    S.15-22
  6. Catarino, M.E.; Baptista, A.A.: Relating folksonomies with Dublin Core (2008) 0.01 
    0.009750376 = product of:
  0.048751883 = sum of:
    0.048751883 = weight(_text_:22 in 2652) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.048751883 = score(doc=2652,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.17819946 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.05088753 = queryNorm
        0.27358043 = fieldWeight in 2652, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2652)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Pages
    S.14-22
    Source
    Metadata for semantic and social applications : proceedings of the International Conference on Dublin Core and Metadata Applications, Berlin, 22 - 26 September 2008, DC 2008: Berlin, Germany / ed. by Jane Greenberg and Wolfgang Klas
  7. Harrer, A.; Lohmann, S.: Potenziale von Tagging als partizipative Methode für Lehrportale und E-Learning-Kurse (2008) 0.01 
    0.009652381 = product of:
  0.048261903 = sum of:
    0.048261903 = weight(_text_:22 in 2889) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.048261903 = score(doc=2889,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.17819946 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.05088753 = queryNorm
        0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2889, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2889)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Date
    21. 6.2009 12:22:44
  8. Kruk, S.R.; Kruk, E.; Stankiewicz, K.: Evaluation of semantic and social technologies for digital libraries (2009) 0.01 
    0.008273469 = product of:
  0.041367345 = sum of:
    0.041367345 = weight(_text_:22 in 3387) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.041367345 = score(doc=3387,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.17819946 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.05088753 = queryNorm
        0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3387, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3387)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Date
    1. 8.2010 12:35:22
  9. Rolla, P.J.: User tags versus Subject headings : can user-supplied data improve subject access to library collections? (2009) 0.01 
    0.008273469 = product of:
  0.041367345 = sum of:
    0.041367345 = weight(_text_:22 in 3601) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.041367345 = score(doc=3601,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.17819946 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.05088753 = queryNorm
        0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3601, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3601)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  10. Strader, C.R.: Author-assigned keywords versus Library of Congress Subject Headings : implications for the cataloging of electronic theses and dissertations (2009) 0.01 
    0.008273469 = product of:
  0.041367345 = sum of:
    0.041367345 = weight(_text_:22 in 3602) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.041367345 = score(doc=3602,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.17819946 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.05088753 = queryNorm
        0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3602, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3602)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  11. Niemann, C.: Tag-Science : Ein Analysemodell zur Nutzbarkeit von Tagging-Daten (2011) 0.01 
    0.008273469 = product of:
  0.041367345 = sum of:
    0.041367345 = weight(_text_:22 in 164) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.041367345 = score(doc=164,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.17819946 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.05088753 = queryNorm
        0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 164, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=164)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Source
    ¬Die Kraft der digitalen Unordnung: 32. Arbeits- und Fortbildungstagung der ASpB e. V., Sektion 5 im Deutschen Bibliotheksverband, 22.-25. September 2009 in der Universität Karlsruhe. Hrsg: Jadwiga Warmbrunn u.a
  12. Danowski, P.: Authority files and Web 2.0 : Wikipedia and the PND. An Example (2007) 0.01 
    0.006894558 = product of:
  0.03447279 = sum of:
    0.03447279 = weight(_text_:22 in 1291) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.03447279 = score(doc=1291,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.17819946 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.05088753 = queryNorm
        0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1291, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1291)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Content
    Vortrag anlässlich des Workshops: "Extending the multilingual capacity of The European Library in the EDL project Stockholm, Swedish National Library, 22-23 November 2007".
  13. Chen, M.; Liu, X.; Qin, J.: Semantic relation extraction from socially-generated tags : a methodology for metadata generation (2008) 0.01 
    0.006894558 = product of:
  0.03447279 = sum of:
    0.03447279 = weight(_text_:22 in 2648) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.03447279 = score(doc=2648,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.17819946 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.05088753 = queryNorm
        0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2648, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2648)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Source
    Metadata for semantic and social applications : proceedings of the International Conference on Dublin Core and Metadata Applications, Berlin, 22 - 26 September 2008, DC 2008: Berlin, Germany / ed. by Jane Greenberg and Wolfgang Klas
  14. Kim, H.L.; Scerri, S.; Breslin, J.G.; Decker, S.; Kim, H.G.: ¬The state of the art in tag ontologies : a semantic model for tagging and folksonomies (2008) 0.01 
    0.006894558 = product of:
  0.03447279 = sum of:
    0.03447279 = weight(_text_:22 in 2650) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.03447279 = score(doc=2650,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.17819946 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.05088753 = queryNorm
        0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2650, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2650)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Source
    Metadata for semantic and social applications : proceedings of the International Conference on Dublin Core and Metadata Applications, Berlin, 22 - 26 September 2008, DC 2008: Berlin, Germany / ed. by Jane Greenberg and Wolfgang Klas
  15. Yi, K.: Harnessing collective intelligence in social tagging using Delicious (2012) 0.01 
    0.006894558 = product of:
  0.03447279 = sum of:
    0.03447279 = weight(_text_:22 in 515) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.03447279 = score(doc=515,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.17819946 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.05088753 = queryNorm
        0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 515, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=515)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Date
    25.12.2012 15:22:37
  16. Choi, Y.; Syn, S.Y.: Characteristics of tagging behavior in digitized humanities online collections (2016) 0.01 
    0.006894558 = product of:
  0.03447279 = sum of:
    0.03447279 = weight(_text_:22 in 2891) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.03447279 = score(doc=2891,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.17819946 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.05088753 = queryNorm
        0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2891, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2891)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Date
    21. 4.2016 11:23:22
  17. Qin, C.; Liu, Y.; Mou, J.; Chen, J.: User adoption of a hybrid social tagging approach in an online knowledge community (2019) 0.01 
    0.006894558 = product of:
  0.03447279 = sum of:
    0.03447279 = weight(_text_:22 in 5492) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.03447279 = score(doc=5492,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.17819946 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.05088753 = queryNorm
        0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 5492, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5492)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Date
    20. 1.2015 18:30:22
  18. Bentley, C.M.; Labelle, P.R.: ¬A comparison of social tagging designs and user participation (2008) 0.01 
    0.005515646 = product of:
  0.027578231 = sum of:
    0.027578231 = weight(_text_:22 in 2657) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.027578231 = score(doc=2657,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.17819946 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.05088753 = queryNorm
        0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 2657, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2657)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Source
    Metadata for semantic and social applications : proceedings of the International Conference on Dublin Core and Metadata Applications, Berlin, 22 - 26 September 2008, DC 2008: Berlin, Germany / ed. by Jane Greenberg and Wolfgang Klas
  19. DeZelar-Tiedman, V.: Doing the LibraryThing(TM) in an academic library catalog (2008) 0.01 
    0.005515646 = product of:
  0.027578231 = sum of:
    0.027578231 = weight(_text_:22 in 2666) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.027578231 = score(doc=2666,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.17819946 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.05088753 = queryNorm
        0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 2666, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2666)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Source
    Metadata for semantic and social applications : proceedings of the International Conference on Dublin Core and Metadata Applications, Berlin, 22 - 26 September 2008, DC 2008: Berlin, Germany / ed. by Jane Greenberg and Wolfgang Klas
  20. Vander Wal, T.: Welcome to the Matrix! (2008) 0.01 
    0.005515646 = product of:
  0.027578231 = sum of:
    0.027578231 = weight(_text_:22 in 2881) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.027578231 = score(doc=2881,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.17819946 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.05088753 = queryNorm
        0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 2881, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2881)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Date
    22. 6.2009 9:15:45

Authors

Years

Languages

  • e 17
  • d 3

Types

Themes

Subjects

Classifications