Search (46 results, page 1 of 3)

0.07460449 = product of:
  0.14920898 = sum of:
    0.14920898 = sum of:
      0.10076562 = weight(_text_:core in 158) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.10076562 = score(doc=158,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.25797358 = queryWeight, product of:
            5.0504966 = idf(docFreq=769, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051078856 = queryNorm
          0.39060444 = fieldWeight in 158, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            5.0504966 = idf(docFreq=769, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=158)
      0.04844336 = weight(_text_:22 in 158) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.04844336 = score(doc=158,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.17886946 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051078856 = queryNorm
          0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 158, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=158)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

The role of cataloging education within the library profession is a topic of considerable interest and debate. Fifty-five heads of reference and sixty-five heads of cataloging in Association of Research Librarians institutions responded to a survey based upon the Association for Library Collections and Technical Services Educational Policy Statement, Appendix: Knowledge and Skills, Intellectual Access and Information Organization, concerning the importance of cataloging competencies for all entry-level academic librarians. The survey found that practitioners agreed upon a definite set of core cataloging competencies that all entry-level academic librarians should possess. This finding holds larger implications for library education for academic librarians and for the profession as a whole.

Date

10. 9.2000 17:38:22

0.05038281 = product of:
  0.10076562 = sum of:
    0.10076562 = product of:
      0.20153125 = sum of:
        0.20153125 = weight(_text_:core in 5464) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.20153125 = score(doc=5464,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.25797358 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.0504966 = idf(docFreq=769, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051078856 = queryNorm
            0.7812089 = fieldWeight in 5464, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              5.0504966 = idf(docFreq=769, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5464)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

Organizational restructuring at Western Kentucky University's Helm-Cravens Library resulted in the consolidation of the service points of the Science Library, Government Documents, and Reference into one centralized Reference Center. This created an environment of information overload and technostress for reference librarians. To help remedy this situation, a core knowledge for electronic reference services for all reference desk personnel was established and a new training programme was implemented. All staff who serve at the reference desk were surveyed to determine which electronic resources should become part of the core electronic knowledge. The results of this survey are tabulated. Describes the intensive training programme undertaken once the core item list was established. The programme has enbaled all reference librarians to lead patrons to pertinent resources

0.030536594 = product of:
  0.061073188 = sum of:
    0.061073188 = product of:
      0.122146375 = sum of:
        0.122146375 = weight(_text_:core in 7379) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.122146375 = score(doc=7379,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.25797358 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.0504966 = idf(docFreq=769, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051078856 = queryNorm
            0.47348404 = fieldWeight in 7379, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              5.0504966 = idf(docFreq=769, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=7379)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

The traditional library and information science (LIS) curriculum for organization of information assumes a cataloging paradigm that is built on the concepts and theories developed throughout the history of library cataloging as well as practical knowledge and skills of applying current standards and systems developed specifically for practice in cataloging. Advocates for LIS curriculum reform point out, however, that this cataloging paradigm must be replaced by knowledge of resources and systems management in order to equip LIS graduates with the knowledge and skills needed for an information society. By comparing the traditional and nontraditional curricula in the area of organization of information, this paper proposes a paradigm for organization of information in which information is defined in the context of five attributes and cataloging is perceived as a mode of organizational behavior. Some implications of this paradigm on the core curriculum for organization of information are suggested

0.030536594 = product of:
  0.061073188 = sum of:
    0.061073188 = product of:
      0.122146375 = sum of:
        0.122146375 = weight(_text_:core in 5749) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.122146375 = score(doc=5749,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.25797358 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.0504966 = idf(docFreq=769, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051078856 = queryNorm
            0.47348404 = fieldWeight in 5749, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              5.0504966 = idf(docFreq=769, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5749)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

Since Library Science Education started in Nigeria about half a century ago, cataloguing has been regarded as a core subject in the curriculum. With the diversification of subjects, some core subjects were made electives. This did not affect cataloguing. Nigerian Libraries have not gone far in electronic data processing in their storage of data and information and as a result, libraries are still manual-oriented. Even though some libraries in Cross River State of Nigeria have taken their first steps towards automation, the library schools still find it necessary to continue to drill students in traditional cataloguing. The question of the relevance of cataloguing in an automated library system arises and this researcher investigates the hypothesis that cataloguing is still relevant in the library school curriculum using the descriptive survey methodology. The finding is that the manual system will continue to be used for a long time and so cataloguing will continue to be relevant even with the computer-produced catalogue.

0.028790178 = product of:
  0.057580356 = sum of:
    0.057580356 = product of:
      0.11516071 = sum of:
        0.11516071 = weight(_text_:core in 5050) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.11516071 = score(doc=5050,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.25797358 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.0504966 = idf(docFreq=769, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051078856 = queryNorm
            0.44640505 = fieldWeight in 5050, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.0504966 = idf(docFreq=769, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5050)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

Argues against various trends towards the downgrading of cataloguing in librarianship. These include the administrative response to the ready availability of shared catalogue records, the targeting of cataloguing positions when library budgets shrink, the 'supply and demand' attitude of library schools in the USA which less often insist on students studying cataloguing, and the lack of a core and prescriptive curriculum for library professionals sponsored by the ALA. The study of cataloguing and cataloguing theory promotes skills that ensure consistency, predictibility and repeatability of access to materials, and the lack of these skills among librarians harms the services they provide

0.028790178 = product of:
  0.057580356 = sum of:
    0.057580356 = product of:
      0.11516071 = sum of:
        0.11516071 = weight(_text_:core in 1114) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.11516071 = score(doc=1114,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.25797358 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.0504966 = idf(docFreq=769, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051078856 = queryNorm
            0.44640505 = fieldWeight in 1114, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.0504966 = idf(docFreq=769, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1114)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

Provides an overview of major developments in information science education in Europe and the USA and poses key questions concerning their impact on information science education in South Africa. These questions deal specifically with issues relating to the general orientation of information science education, the core content of the curriculum and the composition of its compilers

0.02768192 = product of:
  0.05536384 = sum of:
    0.05536384 = product of:
      0.11072768 = sum of:
        0.11072768 = weight(_text_:22 in 435) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.11072768 = score(doc=435,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17886946 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051078856 = queryNorm
            0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 435, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=435)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Source

International forum on information and documentation. 14(1989), S.22-27

0.025191406 = product of:
  0.05038281 = sum of:
    0.05038281 = product of:
      0.10076562 = sum of:
        0.10076562 = weight(_text_:core in 665) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.10076562 = score(doc=665,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.25797358 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.0504966 = idf(docFreq=769, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051078856 = queryNorm
            0.39060444 = fieldWeight in 665, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.0504966 = idf(docFreq=769, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=665)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

The theory versus practice issue in library and information science education in general and in cataloguing education in particular has long been debated. Decreasing budgets, dependence on technology, the availability of bibliographic utilities, and the outsourcing of cataloguing may contribute to the debate and concern associated with cataloguing education. A new library and information services programme at University College of the University of Denver was designed to incorporate the research and scholarly thought and the practice of the library and information science discipline with other related disciplines. The cataloguing component developed for the programme utilizes active learning techniques supplemented by a theoretical core

0.025191406 = product of:
  0.05038281 = sum of:
    0.05038281 = product of:
      0.10076562 = sum of:
        0.10076562 = weight(_text_:core in 5449) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.10076562 = score(doc=5449,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.25797358 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.0504966 = idf(docFreq=769, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051078856 = queryNorm
            0.39060444 = fieldWeight in 5449, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.0504966 = idf(docFreq=769, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5449)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

Cataloging remains a fundamental component of library and information science and has many lessons to teach the architects of the Internet age. All students can benefit from taking a cataloging course, especially if it stresses cataloging as one specific answer to the problems of managing information and places cataloging within a larger context that also includes indexing and Internet search engines. Students deserve cataloging courses that combine theory and practice, avoid memorization, and require them to show a mastery of core principles rather than picky details. This paper includes specific suggestions on how to make cataloging exciting.

0.021592634 = product of:
  0.043185268 = sum of:
    0.043185268 = product of:
      0.086370535 = sum of:
        0.086370535 = weight(_text_:core in 5468) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.086370535 = score(doc=5468,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.25797358 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.0504966 = idf(docFreq=769, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051078856 = queryNorm
            0.3348038 = fieldWeight in 5468, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.0504966 = idf(docFreq=769, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5468)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

Describes the characteristics of contemporary students in library schools, their experiences and expectations, and how they shape the goal of cataloging courses. Reviews historical innovations in cataloging instruction. Defines the nature of "cataloging" courses in the curriculum. Presents samples of innovations used in standard classrooms for teaching and learning a core-course and one of the elective "cataloging" courses. Focuses on how and why online mentor catalogers are incorporated in the teaching and learning of one particular course (Metadata for Internet Resources, at Dominican University Graduate School of Library and Information Science). Discusses how and in what ways collaborative teaching with expert practitioners in cataloging online at remote sites contributes to the education of future librarians.

0.021592634 = product of:
  0.043185268 = sum of:
    0.043185268 = product of:
      0.086370535 = sum of:
        0.086370535 = weight(_text_:core in 5750) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.086370535 = score(doc=5750,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.25797358 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.0504966 = idf(docFreq=769, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051078856 = queryNorm
            0.3348038 = fieldWeight in 5750, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.0504966 = idf(docFreq=769, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5750)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

The education of cataloguing and classification in China includes university education, continuing education, professional training and is provided at basic training, junior college, undergraduate, and graduate levels. Cataloging, classification, and subject analysis are generally the core courses in the university curricula and offered with other required courses. Recent changes in the curricula have been the adjustment and integration of courses, the application of computer technology, the increase of practice, the update of course contents, and the improvement of teaching methods. The future trends of cataloguing and classification education in China may include: constant improvement of the teaching system, standardization of library science programs, introduction to new topics, promotion of graduate education, enhancement of continuing education and training, and development of online courses.

0.021592634 = product of:
  0.043185268 = sum of:
    0.043185268 = product of:
      0.086370535 = sum of:
        0.086370535 = weight(_text_:core in 749) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.086370535 = score(doc=749,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.25797358 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.0504966 = idf(docFreq=769, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051078856 = queryNorm
            0.3348038 = fieldWeight in 749, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.0504966 = idf(docFreq=769, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=749)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

Argues for a central role for information society studies in degree programmes. Information society studies is an interdisciplinary specialism devoted to examination of the macrolevel role of information flows and technologies. The views of information science educators on information society studies are appraised. Reports the current status of information society instruction in the information science schools of the UK and Ireland. Investigation shows ten schools run modules on the information society, in some cases as options. The content, methods of instruction and assessment, and other relevant indicators of the condition of information society studies are reported and analysed. Features a discussion of the rationale for inclusion of this specialism in the information science curriculum, and concludes with a "civic" argument for core status, namely that information professionals have a duty to enter the public debate on important information society issues.

0.021592634 = product of:
  0.043185268 = sum of:
    0.043185268 = product of:
      0.086370535 = sum of:
        0.086370535 = weight(_text_:core in 4616) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.086370535 = score(doc=4616,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.25797358 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.0504966 = idf(docFreq=769, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051078856 = queryNorm
            0.3348038 = fieldWeight in 4616, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.0504966 = idf(docFreq=769, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4616)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

Cataloguing and classification were at the core of the first librarian training programs In 2011, LIS educators continue to believe in the importance of teaching the basics of the classification process to all future information professionals. Information on classification instruction was collected through a survey of instructors in ALA-accredited LIS masters' programs. The survey was structured around issues touching several dimensions of any teaching endeavour, with an emphasis on the tools used to help students develop several types of skills involved in the classification process. This article presents quantitative data provided by respondents representing 31 distinct LIS masters' programs. We hope it can be used as foundation to pursue the examination of classification instruction in an ever changing information world.

0.01799386 = product of:
  0.03598772 = sum of:
    0.03598772 = product of:
      0.07197544 = sum of:
        0.07197544 = weight(_text_:core in 5758) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07197544 = score(doc=5758,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.25797358 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.0504966 = idf(docFreq=769, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051078856 = queryNorm
            0.27900314 = fieldWeight in 5758, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.0504966 = idf(docFreq=769, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5758)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

This is a critical descriptive study of the situation of Cataloging as an academic discipline within Library and Information Science studies in Spain. Material and methods: The descriptive analysis of the sectional contents of the General and Specific Guidelines of the degreees of Diplomado (three-year degree) and Licenciado (five-year degree) in LIS and the Curricular Programs of the Spanish University schools or departments. Variables analyzed: the denomination and content descriptors of the course offerings and credit hours. The test-retest method was used, with a qualitative processing of data. Results: General data is given about the studies in LIS: their introduction, the universities that offer them, and the degrees awarded. Cataloging is considered an obligatory core subject matter, and is represented by several courses that present important differences insofar as their denominations, their credits and their character from one curricular program to the next. The average credit requisite for obligatory courses in cataloging in Spain is 14 (1 credit= 10 class hours), and 19.7 if we also consider the electives. At present, this discipline is undergoing a reform that will produce important changes as a result of the adaptation of university studies to the common framework of the European Union.

0.01799386 = product of:
  0.03598772 = sum of:
    0.03598772 = product of:
      0.07197544 = sum of:
        0.07197544 = weight(_text_:core in 964) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07197544 = score(doc=964,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.25797358 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.0504966 = idf(docFreq=769, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051078856 = queryNorm
            0.27900314 = fieldWeight in 964, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.0504966 = idf(docFreq=769, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=964)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

Many disciplines, including the broad Field of Information (iField), offer Data Science (DS) programs. There have been significant efforts exploring an individual discipline's identity and unique contributions to the broader DS education landscape. To advance DS education in the iField, the iSchool Data Science Curriculum Committee (iDSCC) was formed and charged with building and recommending a DS education framework for iSchools. This paper reports on the research process and findings of a series of studies to address important questions: What is the iField identity in the multidisciplinary DS education landscape? What is the status of DS education in iField schools? What knowledge and skills should be included in the core curriculum for iField DS education? What are the jobs available for DS graduates from the iField? What are the differences between graduate-level and undergraduate-level DS education? Answers to these questions will not only distinguish an iField approach to DS education but also define critical components of DS curriculum. The results will inform individual DS programs in the iField to develop curriculum to support undergraduate and graduate DS education in their local context.

0.0173012 = product of:
  0.0346024 = sum of:
    0.0346024 = product of:
      0.0692048 = sum of:
        0.0692048 = weight(_text_:22 in 175) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0692048 = score(doc=175,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17886946 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051078856 = queryNorm
            0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 175, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=175)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Source

Die theoretische Ausbildung der Bibliotheksreferendare. Die Umsetzung der Empfehlungen für die Ausbildung des Höheren Bibliotheksdienstes an den Ausbildungseinrichtungen. Referate und Diskussionsergebnisse ... 22. und 23.11.1990 in Frankfurt/M. Hrsg.: J. Tehnzen

0.0173012 = product of:
  0.0346024 = sum of:
    0.0346024 = product of:
      0.0692048 = sum of:
        0.0692048 = weight(_text_:22 in 4160) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0692048 = score(doc=4160,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17886946 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051078856 = queryNorm
            0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 4160, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4160)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Source

Information und Märkte: 50. Deutscher Dokumentartag 1998, Kongreß der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Dokumentation e.V. (DGD), Rheinische Friedrich-Wilhelms-Universität Bonn, 22.-24. September 1998. Hrsg. von Marlies Ockenfeld u. Gerhard J. Mantwill

0.0173012 = product of:
  0.0346024 = sum of:
    0.0346024 = product of:
      0.0692048 = sum of:
        0.0692048 = weight(_text_:22 in 6492) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0692048 = score(doc=6492,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17886946 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051078856 = queryNorm
            0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 6492, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=6492)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Date

22. 3.2016 12:14:11

0.0173012 = product of:
  0.0346024 = sum of:
    0.0346024 = product of:
      0.0692048 = sum of:
        0.0692048 = weight(_text_:22 in 117) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0692048 = score(doc=117,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17886946 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051078856 = queryNorm
            0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 117, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=117)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Date

22. 8.2009 19:51:28

0.017127315 = product of:
  0.03425463 = sum of:
    0.03425463 = product of:
      0.06850926 = sum of:
        0.06850926 = weight(_text_:22 in 1400) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06850926 = score(doc=1400,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.17886946 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051078856 = queryNorm
            0.38301262 = fieldWeight in 1400, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1400)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Pages

S.22-32

Source

Knowledge organization in the 21st century: between historical patterns and future prospects. Proceedings of the Thirteenth International ISKO Conference 19-22 May 2014, Kraków, Poland. Ed.: Wieslaw Babik