Search (13 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Hjoerland, B."
  1. Nicolaisen, J.; Hjoerland, B.: ¬A rejoinder to Beghtol (2004) (2004) 0.06 
    0.0591344 = product of:
  0.1182688 = sum of:
    0.1182688 = product of:
      0.2365376 = sum of:
        0.2365376 = weight(_text_:2004 in 3006) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.2365376 = score(doc=3006,freq=11.0), product of:
            0.21705271 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.2057996 = idf(docFreq=1791, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051607955 = queryNorm
            1.0897703 = fieldWeight in 3006, product of:
              3.3166249 = tf(freq=11.0), with freq of:
                11.0 = termFreq=11.0
              4.2057996 = idf(docFreq=1791, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3006)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Footnote
    Bezugnahme auf: Beghtol, C.: Response to Hjoerland and Nicolaisen. In: Knowledge organization. 31(2004) no.1, S.62-63 sowie: Hjoerland, B., J. Nicolaisen: Scientific and scholarly classifications are not "naïve": a comment to Beghtol (2003). In: Knowledge organization. 31(2004) no.1, S.55-61.
    Source
    Knowledge organization. 31(2004) no.3, S.199-201
    Year
    2004
  2. Hjoerland, B.: Theory of knowledge organization and the feasibility of universal solutions (2004) 0.05 
    0.047842085 = product of:
  0.09568417 = sum of:
    0.09568417 = product of:
      0.19136834 = sum of:
        0.19136834 = weight(_text_:2004 in 2404) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.19136834 = score(doc=2404,freq=5.0), product of:
            0.21705271 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.2057996 = idf(docFreq=1791, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051607955 = queryNorm
            0.8816676 = fieldWeight in 2404, product of:
              2.236068 = tf(freq=5.0), with freq of:
                5.0 = termFreq=5.0
              4.2057996 = idf(docFreq=1791, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2404)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Content
    Vortrag, anläßlich der Tagung Eighth International ISKO Conference London, Friday July 16th 2004, Session 9B 2.15-3.45.
    Year
    2004
  3. Hjoerland, B.; Nicolaisen, J.: Scientific and scholarly classifications are not "naïve" : a comment to Begthol (2003) (2004) 0.02 
    0.023586465 = product of:
  0.04717293 = sum of:
    0.04717293 = product of:
      0.09434586 = sum of:
        0.09434586 = weight(_text_:2004 in 3023) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.09434586 = score(doc=3023,freq=7.0), product of:
            0.21705271 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.2057996 = idf(docFreq=1791, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051607955 = queryNorm
            0.43466794 = fieldWeight in 3023, product of:
              2.6457512 = tf(freq=7.0), with freq of:
                7.0 = termFreq=7.0
              4.2057996 = idf(docFreq=1791, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3023)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Footnote
    Bezugnahme auf: Beghtol, C.: Classification for information retrieval and classification for knowledge discovery: relationships between 'professional' and 'naive' classifications" in: Knowledge organization. 30(2003), no.2, S.64-73; vgl. dazu auch die Erwiderung von C. Beghtol in: Knowledge organization. 31(2004) no.1, S.62-63.
    Source
    Knowledge organization. 31(2004) no.1, S.55-61
    Year
    2004
  4. Hjoerland, B.: Arguments for philosophical realism in library and information science (2004) 0.02 
    0.019934202 = product of:
  0.039868403 = sum of:
    0.039868403 = product of:
      0.07973681 = sum of:
        0.07973681 = weight(_text_:2004 in 832) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07973681 = score(doc=832,freq=5.0), product of:
            0.21705271 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.2057996 = idf(docFreq=1791, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051607955 = queryNorm
            0.3673615 = fieldWeight in 832, product of:
              2.236068 = tf(freq=5.0), with freq of:
                5.0 = termFreq=5.0
              4.2057996 = idf(docFreq=1791, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=832)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    Library trends. 52(2004) no.3, S.488-506
    Year
    2004
  5. Hjoerland, B.: Are relations in thesauri "context-free, definitional, and true in all possible worlds"? (2015) 0.01 
    0.012607496 = product of:
  0.025214992 = sum of:
    0.025214992 = product of:
      0.050429985 = sum of:
        0.050429985 = weight(_text_:2004 in 2033) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.050429985 = score(doc=2033,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.21705271 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.2057996 = idf(docFreq=1791, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051607955 = queryNorm
            0.2323398 = fieldWeight in 2033, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.2057996 = idf(docFreq=1791, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2033)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Much of the literature of information science and knowledge organization has accepted and built upon Elaine Svenonius's (2004) claim that "paradigmatic relationships are those that are context-free, definitional, and true in all possible worlds" (p. 583). At the same time, the literature demonstrates a common understanding that paradigmatic relations are the kinds of semantic relations used in thesauri and other knowledge organization systems (including equivalence relations, hierarchical relations, and associative relations). This understanding is problematic and harmful because it directs attention away from the empirical and contextual basis for knowledge-organizing systems. Whether A is a kind of X is certainly not context-free and definitional in empirical sciences or in much everyday information. Semantic relations are theory-dependent and, in biology, for example, a scientific revolution has taken place in which many relations have changed following the new taxonomic paradigm named "cladism." This biological example is not an exception, but the norm. Semantic relations including paradigmatic relations are not a priori but are dependent on subject knowledge, scientific findings, and paradigms. As long as information scientists and knowledge organizers isolate themselves from subject knowledge, knowledge organization cannot possibly progress.
  6. Hjoerland, B.; Christensen, F.S.: Work tasks and socio-cognitive relevance : a specific example (2002) 0.01 
    0.01223629 = product of:
  0.02447258 = sum of:
    0.02447258 = product of:
      0.04894516 = sum of:
        0.04894516 = weight(_text_:22 in 5237) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04894516 = score(doc=5237,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18072227 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051607955 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 5237, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5237)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    21. 7.2006 14:11:22
  7. Hjoerland, B.: Theories of knowledge organization - theories of knowledge (2017) 0.01 
    0.01223629 = product of:
  0.02447258 = sum of:
    0.02447258 = product of:
      0.04894516 = sum of:
        0.04894516 = weight(_text_:22 in 3494) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04894516 = score(doc=3494,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18072227 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051607955 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 3494, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3494)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Pages
    S.22-36
  8. Hjoerland, B.; Hartel, J.: Introduction to a Special Issue of Knowledge Organization (2003) 0.01 
    0.010918411 = product of:
  0.021836823 = sum of:
    0.021836823 = product of:
      0.043673646 = sum of:
        0.043673646 = weight(_text_:2004 in 3013) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.043673646 = score(doc=3013,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.21705271 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.2057996 = idf(docFreq=1791, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051607955 = queryNorm
            0.20121217 = fieldWeight in 3013, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              4.2057996 = idf(docFreq=1791, maxDocs=44218)
              0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=3013)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    It is with very great pleasure that we introduce this special issue of Knowledge Organization on Domain Analysis (DA). Domain analysis is an approach to information science (IS) that emphasizes the social, historical, and cultural dimensions of information. It asserts that collective fields of knowledge, or "domains," form the unit of analysis of information science (IS). DA, elsewhere referred to as a sociocognitive (Hjoerland, 2002b; Jacob & Shaw, 1998) or collectivist (Talja et al, 2004) approach, is one of the major metatheoretical perspectives available to IS scholars to orient their thinking and research. DA's focus an domains stands in contrast to the alternative metatheories of cognitivism and information systems, which direct attention to psychological processes and technological processes, respectively. The first comprehensive international formulation of DA as an explicit point of view was Hjoerland and Albrechtsen (1995). However, a concern for information in the context of a community can be traced back to American library historian and visionary Jesse Shera, and is visible a century ago in the earliest practices of special librarians and European documentalists. More recently, Hjoerland (1998) produced a domain analytic study of the field of psychology; Jacob and Shaw (1998) made an important interpretation and historical review of DA; while Hjoerland (2002a) offered a seminal formulation of eleven approaches to the study of domains, receiving the ASLIB 2003 Award. Fjordback Soendergaard; Andersen and Hjoerland (2003) suggested an approach based an an updated version of the UNISIST-model of scientific communication. In fall 2003, under the conference theme of "Humanizing Information Technology" DA was featured in a keynote address at the annual meeting of the American Society for Information Science and Technology (Hjorland, 2004). These publications and events are evidence of growth in representation of the DA view. To date, informal criticism of domain analysis has followed two tracks. Firstly, that DA assumes its communities to be academic in nature, leaving much of human experience unexplored. Secondly, that there is a lack of case studies illustrating the methods of domain analytic empirical research. Importantly, this special collection marks progress by addressing both issues. In the articles that follow, domains are perceived to be hobbies, professions, and realms of popular culture. Further, other papers serve as models of different ways to execute domain analytic scholarship, whether through traditional empirical methods, or historical and philosophical techniques. Eleven authors have contributed to this special issue, and their backgrounds reflect the diversity of interest in DA. Contributors come from North America, Europe, and the Middle East. Academics from leading research universities are represented. One writer is newly retired, several are in their heyday as scholars, and some are doctoral students just entering this field. This range of perspectives enriches the collection. The first two papers in this issue are invited papers and are, in our opinion, very important. Anders Oerom was a senior lecturer at the Royal Scbool of 'Library and Information Science in Denmark, Aalborg Branch. He retired from this position an March 1, 2004, and this paper is his last contribution in this position. We are grateful that he took the time to complete "Knowledge Organization in the Domain of Art Studies - History, Transition and Conceptual Changes" in spite of many other duties. Versions of the paper have previously been presented at a Ph.D-course in knowledge organization and related versions have been published in Danish and Spanish. In many respects, it represents a model of how a domain could, or should, be investigated from the DA point of view.
  9. Hjoerland, B.: ¬The importance of theories of knowledge : indexing and information retrieval as an example (2011) 0.01 
    0.0104882475 = product of:
  0.020976495 = sum of:
    0.020976495 = product of:
      0.04195299 = sum of:
        0.04195299 = weight(_text_:22 in 4359) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04195299 = score(doc=4359,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18072227 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051607955 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4359, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4359)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    17. 3.2011 19:22:55
  10. Hjoerland, B.: User-based and cognitive approaches to knowledge organization : a theoretical analysis of the research literature (2013) 0.01 
    0.008740207 = product of:
  0.017480414 = sum of:
    0.017480414 = product of:
      0.03496083 = sum of:
        0.03496083 = weight(_text_:22 in 629) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03496083 = score(doc=629,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18072227 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051607955 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 629, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=629)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    22. 2.2013 11:49:13
  11. Hjoerland, B.: Classical databases and knowledge organisation : a case for Boolean retrieval and human decision-making during search (2014) 0.01 
    0.008740207 = product of:
  0.017480414 = sum of:
    0.017480414 = product of:
      0.03496083 = sum of:
        0.03496083 = weight(_text_:22 in 1398) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03496083 = score(doc=1398,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18072227 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051607955 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1398, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1398)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    Knowledge organization in the 21st century: between historical patterns and future prospects. Proceedings of the Thirteenth International ISKO Conference 19-22 May 2014, Kraków, Poland. Ed.: Wieslaw Babik
  12. Hjoerland, B.: Table of contents (ToC) (2022) 0.01 
    0.008740207 = product of:
  0.017480414 = sum of:
    0.017480414 = product of:
      0.03496083 = sum of:
        0.03496083 = weight(_text_:22 in 1096) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03496083 = score(doc=1096,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18072227 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051607955 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1096, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1096)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    18.11.2023 13:47:22
  13. Hjoerland, B.: ¬The controversy over the concept of information : a rejoinder to Professor Bates (2009) 0.00 
    0.0043701036 = product of:
  0.008740207 = sum of:
    0.008740207 = product of:
      0.017480414 = sum of:
        0.017480414 = weight(_text_:22 in 2748) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.017480414 = score(doc=2748,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18072227 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051607955 = queryNorm
            0.09672529 = fieldWeight in 2748, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=2748)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    22. 3.2009 18:13:27

Authors

Years

Types

Themes