Search (3876 results, page 2 of 194)

0.09458476 = product of:
  0.18916953 = sum of:
    0.18916953 = product of:
      0.37833905 = sum of:
        0.37833905 = weight(_text_:plus in 2690) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.37833905 = score(doc=2690,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.3101809 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.1714344 = idf(docFreq=250, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05026075 = queryNorm
            1.2197368 = fieldWeight in 2690, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              6.1714344 = idf(docFreq=250, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2690)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

UMI have announced the availability of ProQuest Computing and ProQuest Telecommunications, offering full text coverage of periodicals in computing and telecommunications respectively. UMI have also made available 3 H.W. Wilson databases through their ProQuest online service: Social Sciences PlusText; General Science Plus Text; and Education Plus Text

Object

Social Sciences Plus Text
General Science Plus Text
Education Plus Text

0.09158131 = product of:
  0.18316261 = sum of:
    0.18316261 = product of:
      0.36632523 = sum of:
        0.36632523 = weight(_text_:plus in 2336) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.36632523 = score(doc=2336,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.3101809 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.1714344 = idf(docFreq=250, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05026075 = queryNorm
            1.1810051 = fieldWeight in 2336, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              6.1714344 = idf(docFreq=250, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2336)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

Describes the work undertaken at the Owen Science and Engineering Library, Washington State University, to create a keyword index to the National Library of Medicine's Quick Bibliographic Series using the PC-File Plus software

Object

PC-File Plus

0.09158131 = product of:
  0.18316261 = sum of:
    0.18316261 = product of:
      0.36632523 = sum of:
        0.36632523 = weight(_text_:plus in 3703) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.36632523 = score(doc=3703,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.3101809 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.1714344 = idf(docFreq=250, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05026075 = queryNorm
            1.1810051 = fieldWeight in 3703, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              6.1714344 = idf(docFreq=250, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3703)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

Discusses the installation and integration of OCLC's CAT ME Plus software into the US Courts Library, Phoenix. Describes retrospective conversion and reclassification, current copy cataloguing and original cataloguing, components of the new system, workflow changes and savings in costs and staff time

Object

CAT ME Plus

0.09158131 = product of:
  0.18316261 = sum of:
    0.18316261 = product of:
      0.36632523 = sum of:
        0.36632523 = weight(_text_:plus in 4164) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.36632523 = score(doc=4164,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.3101809 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.1714344 = idf(docFreq=250, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05026075 = queryNorm
            1.1810051 = fieldWeight in 4164, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              6.1714344 = idf(docFreq=250, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4164)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

dBase III plus can be used to develop databases of special collections that provide indexed access in several ways. This case study reports on collection of children's books

Object

dBase III plus

0.09158131 = product of:
  0.18316261 = sum of:
    0.18316261 = product of:
      0.36632523 = sum of:
        0.36632523 = weight(_text_:plus in 7393) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.36632523 = score(doc=7393,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.3101809 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.1714344 = idf(docFreq=250, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05026075 = queryNorm
            1.1810051 = fieldWeight in 7393, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              6.1714344 = idf(docFreq=250, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=7393)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

Describes the application of INMAGIC Plus software, by the Environmental Protection Agency's Department of Pesticide Regulation Library, California, to create a computerized database consisting of the environmental data and studies submitted by manufacturers and formulators of pesticides and fungicides as part of the registration process with the Environmental Protection Agency

Object

INMAGIC Plus

0.09158131 = product of:
  0.18316261 = sum of:
    0.18316261 = product of:
      0.36632523 = sum of:
        0.36632523 = weight(_text_:plus in 3381) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.36632523 = score(doc=3381,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.3101809 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.1714344 = idf(docFreq=250, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05026075 = queryNorm
            1.1810051 = fieldWeight in 3381, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              6.1714344 = idf(docFreq=250, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3381)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

Part 1 of 2 part article examining the use of bibliography formatting software for managing online search output. Looks at the use of EndNote Plus 2 and its companion program EndLink. Gives examples of the difficulties encountered in importing references from ABI/INFORM and IAC databases

Object

EndNote Plus

0.09158131 = product of:
  0.18316261 = sum of:
    0.18316261 = product of:
      0.36632523 = sum of:
        0.36632523 = weight(_text_:plus in 341) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.36632523 = score(doc=341,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.3101809 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.1714344 = idf(docFreq=250, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05026075 = queryNorm
            1.1810051 = fieldWeight in 341, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              6.1714344 = idf(docFreq=250, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=341)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

Reviews the EndNote Plus 2.3 dual purpose Windows based software designed as a database manager and as a bibliography maker to insert citations into word processing documents and later compile the bibliography in the required format

Object

EndNote Plus

0.089730985 = product of:
  0.17946197 = sum of:
    0.17946197 = product of:
      0.35892394 = sum of:
        0.35892394 = weight(_text_:plus in 2857) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.35892394 = score(doc=2857,freq=16.0), product of:
            0.3101809 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.1714344 = idf(docFreq=250, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05026075 = queryNorm
            1.157144 = fieldWeight in 2857, product of:
              4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
                16.0 = termFreq=16.0
              6.1714344 = idf(docFreq=250, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2857)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

Bibliometric analysis based on literature in the Web of Science (WOS) has become an increasingly popular method for visualizing the structure of scientific fields. Keywords Plus and Author Keywords are commonly selected as units of analysis, despite the limited research evidence demonstrating the effectiveness of Keywords Plus. This study was conceived to evaluate the efficacy of Keywords Plus as a parameter for capturing the content and scientific concepts presented in articles. Using scientific papers about patient adherence that were retrieved from WOS, a comparative assessment of Keywords Plus and Author Keywords was performed at the scientific field level and the document level, respectively. Our search yielded more Keywords Plus terms than Author Keywords, and the Keywords Plus terms were more broadly descriptive. Keywords Plus is as effective as Author Keywords in terms of bibliometric analysis investigating the knowledge structure of scientific fields, but it is less comprehensive in representing an article's content.

0.08459918 = product of:
  0.16919836 = sum of:
    0.16919836 = product of:
      0.33839673 = sum of:
        0.33839673 = weight(_text_:plus in 3226) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.33839673 = score(doc=3226,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.3101809 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.1714344 = idf(docFreq=250, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05026075 = queryNorm
            1.0909657 = fieldWeight in 3226, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              6.1714344 = idf(docFreq=250, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=3226)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

0.08459918 = product of:
  0.16919836 = sum of:
    0.16919836 = product of:
      0.33839673 = sum of:
        0.33839673 = weight(_text_:plus in 4341) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.33839673 = score(doc=4341,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.3101809 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.1714344 = idf(docFreq=250, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05026075 = queryNorm
            1.0909657 = fieldWeight in 4341, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              6.1714344 = idf(docFreq=250, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4341)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

0.08459918 = product of:
  0.16919836 = sum of:
    0.16919836 = product of:
      0.33839673 = sum of:
        0.33839673 = weight(_text_:plus in 7022) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.33839673 = score(doc=7022,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.3101809 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.1714344 = idf(docFreq=250, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05026075 = queryNorm
            1.0909657 = fieldWeight in 7022, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              6.1714344 = idf(docFreq=250, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7022)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

Reviews Inmagic Plus, the text retrieval software from Soutron Ltd. It includes a menu driven search interface and modern database management facilities such as a comprehensive data validation facility and the ability to defer the indexing of new records to an overnight batch process. While not using a relational database architecture, Inmagic Plus is highly flexible in the way that it handles different record structures together. Provides the example of Penspen Ltd's use of Inmagic for managing technical standards documents

Object

Inmagic Plus

0.08459918 = product of:
  0.16919836 = sum of:
    0.16919836 = product of:
      0.33839673 = sum of:
        0.33839673 = weight(_text_:plus in 4956) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.33839673 = score(doc=4956,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.3101809 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.1714344 = idf(docFreq=250, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05026075 = queryNorm
            1.0909657 = fieldWeight in 4956, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              6.1714344 = idf(docFreq=250, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4956)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

The arrival of personal computer based bibliographic database packages has revolutionized the acquisition of research references. End Note Plus 2 enables the user to input a wide range of reference types, globally edit, sort, search and output them in a large number of recognized formats. Reviews End Note Plus 2 and End Note Link 2

Object

EndNote Plus

0.08459918 = product of:
  0.16919836 = sum of:
    0.16919836 = product of:
      0.33839673 = sum of:
        0.33839673 = weight(_text_:plus in 360) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.33839673 = score(doc=360,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.3101809 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.1714344 = idf(docFreq=250, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05026075 = queryNorm
            1.0909657 = fieldWeight in 360, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              6.1714344 = idf(docFreq=250, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=360)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

A review of EndNote Plus which enables users to create and export lists of references for use in wordprocessing packages. The system has been available for some time, but a new version (2.3) has improved the links between database and wordprocessing packages. Creation of reference lists is a simple task and searching is rapid, although indexing is rather slow. Documentation and online help screens are more that adequate and an active discussion group is maintained by the supplier. It is particular suitable in conjunction with Windows

Footnote

Übers. d. Titels: EndNote Plus for the end user

Object

EndNote Plus

0.0838783 = product of:
  0.1677566 = sum of:
    0.1677566 = sum of:
      0.12689878 = weight(_text_:plus in 5507) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.12689878 = score(doc=5507,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.3101809 = queryWeight, product of:
            6.1714344 = idf(docFreq=250, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05026075 = queryNorm
          0.40911216 = fieldWeight in 5507, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            6.1714344 = idf(docFreq=250, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5507)
      0.04085782 = weight(_text_:22 in 5507) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.04085782 = score(doc=5507,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.17600457 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05026075 = queryNorm
          0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 5507, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5507)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

Addresses the technical and policy issues in the development of an international infrastructure for the flow of information by studying the emerging national information infrastructures in 6 post communist countries in Central and Eastern Europe. The study consisted of interviews with over 300 library managers, computing network administrators, government policy makers and other information professionals conducted in 1993 and 1994 in Croatia, the Czech Republic, Hungary, Poland, Slovakia and Slovenia, plus a 1994 mail survey of research libraries in these countries. After presenting the principles under which the G-7 leading industrialized countries have agreed to collaborate on constructing a Global Information Infrastructure (GII), presents examples from the survey on how the GII pronciples might be addressed. Results of the longitudinal study were reported at greater length in the Proceedings of the 58th Meeting of the ASIS, 1995, S.27-34

Source

IFLA journal. 22(1996) no.2, S.121-127

0.0838783 = product of:
  0.1677566 = sum of:
    0.1677566 = sum of:
      0.12689878 = weight(_text_:plus in 1893) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.12689878 = score(doc=1893,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.3101809 = queryWeight, product of:
            6.1714344 = idf(docFreq=250, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05026075 = queryNorm
          0.40911216 = fieldWeight in 1893, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            6.1714344 = idf(docFreq=250, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1893)
      0.04085782 = weight(_text_:22 in 1893) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.04085782 = score(doc=1893,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.17600457 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05026075 = queryNorm
          0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1893, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1893)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Source

Online and CD-ROM review. 22(1998) no.2, S.55-72

0.0838783 = product of:
  0.1677566 = sum of:
    0.1677566 = sum of:
      0.12689878 = weight(_text_:plus in 1345) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.12689878 = score(doc=1345,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.3101809 = queryWeight, product of:
            6.1714344 = idf(docFreq=250, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05026075 = queryNorm
          0.40911216 = fieldWeight in 1345, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            6.1714344 = idf(docFreq=250, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1345)
      0.04085782 = weight(_text_:22 in 1345) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.04085782 = score(doc=1345,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.17600457 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05026075 = queryNorm
          0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1345, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1345)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

Evaluating collections of XML documents without paying attention to the schema they were written in may give interesting insights into the expected characteristics of a markup language, as well as any regularity that may span vocabularies and languages, and that are more fundamental and frequent than plain content models. In this paper we explore the idea of structural patterns in XML vocabularies, by examining the characteristics of elements as they are used, rather than as they are defined. We introduce from the ground up a formal theory of 8 plus 3 structural patterns for XML elements, and verify their identifiability in a number of different XML vocabularies. The results allowed the creation of visualization and content extraction tools that are completely independent of the schema and without any previous knowledge of the semantics and organization of the XML vocabulary of the documents.

Date

22. 8.2014 17:08:49

0.0838783 = product of:
  0.1677566 = sum of:
    0.1677566 = sum of:
      0.12689878 = weight(_text_:plus in 1848) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.12689878 = score(doc=1848,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.3101809 = queryWeight, product of:
            6.1714344 = idf(docFreq=250, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05026075 = queryNorm
          0.40911216 = fieldWeight in 1848, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            6.1714344 = idf(docFreq=250, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1848)
      0.04085782 = weight(_text_:22 in 1848) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.04085782 = score(doc=1848,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.17600457 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05026075 = queryNorm
          0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1848, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1848)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

The goal of entity linking is to associate references to an entity that is found in unstructured natural language content to an authoritative inventory of known entities. This article describes the construction of 6 test collections for cross-language person-entity linking that together span 22 languages. Fully automated components were used together with 2 crowdsourced validation stages to affordably generate ground-truth annotations with an accuracy comparable to that of a completely manual process. The resulting test collections each contain between 642 (Arabic) and 2,361 (Romanian) person references in non-English texts for which the correct resolution in English Wikipedia is known, plus a similar number of references for which no correct resolution into English Wikipedia is believed to exist. Fully automated cross-language person-name linking experiments with 20 non-English languages yielded a resolution accuracy of between 0.84 (Serbian) and 0.98 (Romanian), which compares favorably with previously reported cross-language entity linking results for Spanish.

0.08354693 = sum of:
  0.06652284 = product of:
    0.1995685 = sum of:
      0.1995685 = weight(_text_:3a in 3577) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.1995685 = score(doc=3577,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.4261112 = queryWeight, product of:
            8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05026075 = queryNorm
          0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 3577, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3577)
    0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.017024094 = product of:
    0.03404819 = sum of:
      0.03404819 = weight(_text_:22 in 3577) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.03404819 = score(doc=3577,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.17600457 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05026075 = queryNorm
          0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 3577, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3577)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)

Content

1. Agrarwissenschaften 1981. - 3. Allgemeine Geographie 2.1972. - 3a. Allgemeine Naturwissenschaften 1.1973. - 4. Allgemeine Sprachwissenschaft, Allgemeine Literaturwissenschaft 2.1971. - 6. Allgemeines. 5.1983. - 7. Anglistik 3.1976. - 8. Astronomie, Geodäsie 4.1977. - 12. bio Biologie, bcp Biochemie-Biophysik, bot Botanik, zoo Zoologie 1981. - 13. Bremensien 3.1983. - 13a. Buch- und Bibliothekswesen 3.1975. - 14. Chemie 4.1977. - 14a. Elektrotechnik 1974. - 15 Ethnologie 2.1976. - 16,1. Geowissenschaften. Sachteil 3.1977. - 16,2. Geowissenschaften. Regionaler Teil 3.1977. - 17. Germanistik 6.1984. - 17a,1. Geschichte. Teilsystematik hil. - 17a,2. Geschichte. Teilsystematik his Neuere Geschichte. - 17a,3. Geschichte. Teilsystematik hit Neueste Geschichte. - 18. Humanbiologie 2.1983. - 19. Ingenieurwissenschaften 1974. - 20. siehe 14a. - 21. klassische Philologie 3.1977. - 22. Klinische Medizin 1975. - 23. Kunstgeschichte 2.1971. - 24. Kybernetik. 2.1975. - 25. Mathematik 3.1974. - 26. Medizin 1976. - 26a. Militärwissenschaft 1985. - 27. Musikwissenschaft 1978. - 27a. Noten 2.1974. - 28. Ozeanographie 3.1977. -29. Pädagogik 8.1985. - 30. Philosphie 3.1974. - 31. Physik 3.1974. - 33. Politik, Politische Wissenschaft, Sozialwissenschaft. Soziologie. Länderschlüssel. Register 1981. - 34. Psychologie 2.1972. - 35. Publizistik und Kommunikationswissenschaft 1985. - 36. Rechtswissenschaften 1986. - 37. Regionale Geograpgie 3.1975. - 37a. Religionswissenschaft 1970. - 38. Romanistik 3.1976. - 39. Skandinavistik 4.1985. - 40. Slavistik 1977. - 40a. Sonstige Sprachen und Literaturen 1973. - 43. Sport 4.1983. - 44. Theaterwissenschaft 1985. - 45. Theologie 2.1976. - 45a. Ur- und Frühgeschichte, Archäologie 1970. - 47. Volkskunde 1976. - 47a. Wirtschaftswissenschaften 1971 // Schlüssel: 1. Länderschlüssel 1971. - 2. Formenschlüssel (Kurzform) 1974. - 3. Personenschlüssel Literatur 5. Fassung 1968

0.0798274 = product of:
  0.1596548 = sum of:
    0.1596548 = product of:
      0.47896436 = sum of:
        0.47896436 = weight(_text_:3a in 973) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.47896436 = score(doc=973,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.4261112 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05026075 = queryNorm
            1.1240361 = fieldWeight in 973, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=973)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Content

Vgl.: http%3A%2F%2Fcreativechoice.org%2Fdoc%2FHansJonas.pdf&usg=AOvVaw1TM3teaYKgABL5H9yoIifA&opi=89978449.

0.07770931 = product of:
  0.15541862 = sum of:
    0.15541862 = product of:
      0.31083724 = sum of:
        0.31083724 = weight(_text_:plus in 34) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.31083724 = score(doc=34,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.3101809 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.1714344 = idf(docFreq=250, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05026075 = queryNorm
            1.002116 = fieldWeight in 34, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              6.1714344 = idf(docFreq=250, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=34)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

An earlier article compared the LISA CD-ROM database in its original form, when produced by SilverPlatter Information Inc., and its current form, as LISA PLUS, since LISA's acquisition by Bowker-Saur in 1990 (Electronic library 12(1994) no.1, S.5-9). The article compared the 2 databases with regard to the user interface software (SilverPlatter and Bowker Plus) particularly from the viewpoint of functionality and ease of use. The version of LISA PLUS, used in the study, was at an intermediate stage of development and because of this, errors crept into the study and some of the strenghts of LISA PLUS were missed. This short communication corrects these errors and points to improvements planned for the future including: cleaning up of the database; and loading of the LISA thesaurus on the database