Search (16 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × theme_ss:"Semantic Web"
  • × type_ss:"el"
  1. Dextre Clarke, S.G.: Challenges and opportunities for KOS standards (2007) 0.02
    0.024426885 = product of:
      0.04885377 = sum of:
        0.04885377 = product of:
          0.09770754 = sum of:
            0.09770754 = weight(_text_:22 in 4643) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.09770754 = score(doc=4643,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18038483 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051511593 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 4643, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4643)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 9.2007 15:41:14
  2. Zhang, L.; Liu, Q.L.; Zhang, J.; Wang, H.F.; Pan, Y.; Yu, Y.: Semplore: an IR approach to scalable hybrid query of Semantic Web data (2007) 0.02
    0.02352863 = product of:
      0.04705726 = sum of:
        0.04705726 = product of:
          0.09411452 = sum of:
            0.09411452 = weight(_text_:index in 231) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.09411452 = score(doc=231,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.2250935 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051511593 = queryNorm
                0.418113 = fieldWeight in 231, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=231)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    As an extension to the current Web, Semantic Web will not only contain structured data with machine understandable semantics but also textual information. While structured queries can be used to find information more precisely on the Semantic Web, keyword searches are still needed to help exploit textual information. It thus becomes very important that we can combine precise structured queries with imprecise keyword searches to have a hybrid query capability. In addition, due to the huge volume of information on the Semantic Web, the hybrid query must be processed in a very scalable way. In this paper, we define such a hybrid query capability that combines unary tree-shaped structured queries with keyword searches. We show how existing information retrieval (IR) index structures and functions can be reused to index semantic web data and its textual information, and how the hybrid query is evaluated on the index structure using IR engines in an efficient and scalable manner. We implemented this IR approach in an engine called Semplore. Comprehensive experiments on its performance show that it is a promising approach. It leads us to believe that it may be possible to evolve current web search engines to query and search the Semantic Web. Finally, we briefy describe how Semplore is used for searching Wikipedia and an IBM customer's product information.
  3. Broughton, V.: Automatic metadata generation : Digital resource description without human intervention (2007) 0.02
    0.02093733 = product of:
      0.04187466 = sum of:
        0.04187466 = product of:
          0.08374932 = sum of:
            0.08374932 = weight(_text_:22 in 6048) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08374932 = score(doc=6048,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18038483 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051511593 = queryNorm
                0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 6048, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6048)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 9.2007 15:41:14
  4. Tudhope, D.: Knowledge Organization System Services : brief review of NKOS activities and possibility of KOS registries (2007) 0.02
    0.02093733 = product of:
      0.04187466 = sum of:
        0.04187466 = product of:
          0.08374932 = sum of:
            0.08374932 = weight(_text_:22 in 100) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08374932 = score(doc=100,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18038483 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051511593 = queryNorm
                0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 100, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=100)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 9.2007 15:41:14
  5. Cahier, J.-P.; Zaher, L'H.; Isoard , G.: Document et modèle pour l'action, une méthode pour le web socio-sémantique : application à un web 2.0 en développement durable (2010) 0.02
    0.019017963 = product of:
      0.038035925 = sum of:
        0.038035925 = product of:
          0.07607185 = sum of:
            0.07607185 = weight(_text_:index in 4836) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07607185 = score(doc=4836,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.2250935 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051511593 = queryNorm
                0.33795667 = fieldWeight in 4836, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4836)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    We present the DOCMA method (DOCument and Model for Action) focused to Socio-Semantic web applications in large communities of interest. DOCMA is dedicated to end-users without any knowledge in Information Science. Community Members can elicit, structure and index shared business items emerging from their inquiry (such as projects, actors, products, geographically situated objects of interest.). We apply DOCMA to an experiment in the field of Sustainable Development: the Cartodd-Map21 collaborative Web portal.
  6. Davies, J.; Weeks, R.; Krohn, U.: QuizRDF: search technology for the Semantic Web (2004) 0.02
    0.01630111 = product of:
      0.03260222 = sum of:
        0.03260222 = product of:
          0.06520444 = sum of:
            0.06520444 = weight(_text_:index in 4316) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06520444 = score(doc=4316,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.2250935 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051511593 = queryNorm
                0.28967714 = fieldWeight in 4316, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4316)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    An information-seeking system is described which combines traditional keyword querying of WWW resources with the ability to browse and query against RDF annotations of those resources. RDF(S) and RDF are used to specify and populate an ontology and the resultant RDF annotations are then indexed along with the full text of the annotated resources. The resultant index allows both keyword querying against the full text of the document and the literal values occurring in the RDF annotations, along with the ability to browse and query the ontology. We motivate our approach as a key enabler for fully exploiting the Semantic Web in the area of knowledge management and argue that the ability to combine searching and browsing behaviours more fully supports a typical information-seeking task. The approach is characterised as "low threshold, high ceiling" in the sense that where RDF annotations exist they are exploited for an improved information-seeking experience but where they do not yet exist, a search capability is still available.
  7. Eckert, K.: SKOS: eine Sprache für die Übertragung von Thesauri ins Semantic Web (2011) 0.01
    0.01395822 = product of:
      0.02791644 = sum of:
        0.02791644 = product of:
          0.05583288 = sum of:
            0.05583288 = weight(_text_:22 in 4331) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.05583288 = score(doc=4331,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18038483 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051511593 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4331, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4331)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    15. 3.2011 19:21:22
  8. OWL Web Ontology Language Test Cases (2004) 0.01
    0.01395822 = product of:
      0.02791644 = sum of:
        0.02791644 = product of:
          0.05583288 = sum of:
            0.05583288 = weight(_text_:22 in 4685) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.05583288 = score(doc=4685,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18038483 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051511593 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4685, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4685)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    14. 8.2011 13:33:22
  9. Davies, J.; Weeks, R.: QuizRDF: search technology for the Semantic Web (2004) 0.01
    0.013584259 = product of:
      0.027168518 = sum of:
        0.027168518 = product of:
          0.054337036 = sum of:
            0.054337036 = weight(_text_:index in 4320) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.054337036 = score(doc=4320,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.2250935 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051511593 = queryNorm
                0.24139762 = fieldWeight in 4320, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4320)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    An information-seeking system is described which combines traditional keyword querying of WWW resources with the ability to browse and query against RD annotations of those resources. RDF(S) and RDF are used to specify and populate an ontology and the resultant RDF annotations are then indexed along with the full text of the annotated resources. The resultant index allows both keyword querying against the full text of the document and the literal values occurring in the RDF annotations, along with the ability to browse and query the ontology. We motivate our approach as a key enabler for fully exploiting the Semantic Web in the area of knowledge management and argue that the ability to combine searching and browsing behaviours more fully supports a typical information-seeking task. The approach is characterised as "low threshold, high ceiling" in the sense that where RDF annotations exist they are exploited for an improved information-seeking experience but where they do not yet exist, a search capability is still available.
  10. Heery, R.; Wagner, H.: ¬A metadata registry for the Semantic Web (2002) 0.01
    0.013447731 = product of:
      0.026895462 = sum of:
        0.026895462 = product of:
          0.053790923 = sum of:
            0.053790923 = weight(_text_:index in 1210) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.053790923 = score(doc=1210,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.2250935 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051511593 = queryNorm
                0.23897146 = fieldWeight in 1210, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=1210)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    * Agencies maintaining directories of data elements in a domain area in accordance with ISO/IEC 11179 (This standard specifies good practice for data element definition as well as the registration process. Example implementations are the National Health Information Knowledgebase hosted by the Australian Institute of Health and Welfare and the Environmental Data Registry hosted by the US Environmental Protection Agency.); * The xml.org directory of the Extended Markup Language (XML) document specifications facilitating re-use of Document Type Definition (DTD), hosted by the Organization for the Advancement of Structured Information Standards (OASIS); * The MetaForm database of Dublin Core usage and mappings maintained at the State and University Library in Goettingen; * The Semantic Web Agreement Group Dictionary, a database of terms for the Semantic Web that can be referred to by humans and software agents; * LEXML, a multi-lingual and multi-jurisdictional RDF Dictionary for the legal world; * The SCHEMAS registry maintained by the European Commission funded SCHEMAS project, which indexes several metadata element sets as well as a large number of activity reports describing metadata related activities and initiatives. Metadata registries essentially provide an index of terms. Given the distributed nature of the Web, there are a number of ways this can be accomplished. For example, the registry could link to terms and definitions in schemas published by implementers and stored locally by the schema maintainer. Alternatively, the registry might harvest various metadata schemas from their maintainers. Registries provide 'added value' to users by indexing schemas relevant to a particular 'domain' or 'community of use' and by simplifying the navigation of terms by enabling multiple schemas to be accessed from one view. An important benefit of this approach is an increase in the reuse of existing terms, rather than users having to reinvent them. Merging schemas to one view leads to harmonization between applications and helps avoid duplication of effort. Additionally, the establishment of registries to index terms actively being used in local implementations facilitates the metadata standards activity by providing implementation experience transferable to the standards-making process.
  11. Mayfield, J.; Finin, T.: Information retrieval on the Semantic Web : integrating inference and retrieval 0.01
    0.0122134425 = product of:
      0.024426885 = sum of:
        0.024426885 = product of:
          0.04885377 = sum of:
            0.04885377 = weight(_text_:22 in 4330) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04885377 = score(doc=4330,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18038483 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051511593 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 4330, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4330)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    12. 2.2011 17:35:22
  12. Heflin, J.; Hendler, J.: Semantic interoperability on the Web (2000) 0.01
    0.0122134425 = product of:
      0.024426885 = sum of:
        0.024426885 = product of:
          0.04885377 = sum of:
            0.04885377 = weight(_text_:22 in 759) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04885377 = score(doc=759,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18038483 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051511593 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 759, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=759)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    11. 5.2013 19:22:18
  13. Radhakrishnan, A.: Swoogle : an engine for the Semantic Web (2007) 0.01
    0.010867407 = product of:
      0.021734813 = sum of:
        0.021734813 = product of:
          0.043469626 = sum of:
            0.043469626 = weight(_text_:index in 4709) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.043469626 = score(doc=4709,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.2250935 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051511593 = queryNorm
                0.1931181 = fieldWeight in 4709, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4709)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Content
    "Swoogle, the Semantic web search engine, is a research project carried out by the ebiquity research group in the Computer Science and Electrical Engineering Department at the University of Maryland. It's an engine tailored towards finding documents on the semantic web. The whole research paper is available here. Semantic web is touted as the next generation of online content representation where the web documents are represented in a language that is not only easy for humans but is machine readable (easing the integration of data as never thought possible) as well. And the main elements of the semantic web include data model description formats such as Resource Description Framework (RDF), a variety of data interchange formats (e.g. RDF/XML, Turtle, N-Triples), and notations such as RDF Schema (RDFS), the Web Ontology Language (OWL), all of which are intended to provide a formal description of concepts, terms, and relationships within a given knowledge domain (Wikipedia). And Swoogle is an attempt to mine and index this new set of web documents. The engine performs crawling of semantic documents like most web search engines and the search is available as web service too. The engine is primarily written in Java with the PHP used for the front-end and MySQL for database. Swoogle is capable of searching over 10,000 ontologies and indexes more that 1.3 million web documents. It also computes the importance of a Semantic Web document. The techniques used for indexing are the more google-type page ranking and also mining the documents for inter-relationships that are the basis for the semantic web. For more information on how the RDF framework can be used to relate documents, read the link here. Being a research project, and with a non-commercial motive, there is not much hype around Swoogle. However, the approach to indexing of Semantic web documents is an approach that most engines will have to take at some point of time. When the Internet debuted, there were no specific engines available for indexing or searching. The Search domain only picked up as more and more content became available. One fundamental question that I've always wondered about it is - provided that the search engines return very relevant results for a query - how to ascertain that the documents are indeed the most relevant ones available. There is always an inherent delay in indexing of document. Its here that the new semantic documents search engines can close delay. Experimenting with the concept of Search in the semantic web can only bore well for the future of search technology."
  14. Hollink, L.; Assem, M. van: Estimating the relevance of search results in the Culture-Web : a study of semantic distance measures (2010) 0.01
    0.010468665 = product of:
      0.02093733 = sum of:
        0.02093733 = product of:
          0.04187466 = sum of:
            0.04187466 = weight(_text_:22 in 4649) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04187466 = score(doc=4649,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18038483 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051511593 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4649, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4649)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    26.12.2011 13:40:22
  15. Firnkes, M.: Schöne neue Welt : der Content der Zukunft wird von Algorithmen bestimmt (2015) 0.01
    0.010468665 = product of:
      0.02093733 = sum of:
        0.02093733 = product of:
          0.04187466 = sum of:
            0.04187466 = weight(_text_:22 in 2118) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04187466 = score(doc=2118,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18038483 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051511593 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2118, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2118)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    5. 7.2015 22:02:31
  16. Monireh, E.; Sarker, M.K.; Bianchi, F.; Hitzler, P.; Doran, D.; Xie, N.: Reasoning over RDF knowledge bases using deep learning (2018) 0.01
    0.008723888 = product of:
      0.017447775 = sum of:
        0.017447775 = product of:
          0.03489555 = sum of:
            0.03489555 = weight(_text_:22 in 4553) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03489555 = score(doc=4553,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18038483 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051511593 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 4553, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4553)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    16.11.2018 14:22:01