-
Markey, K.: Dewey Decimal Classification online project: integration of a library schedule and index into the subject searching capabilities of an online catalog (1985)
0.13
0.12667331 = product of:
0.19000997 = sum of:
0.15013684 = weight(_text_:index in 157) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.15013684 = score(doc=157,freq=2.0), product of:
0.2221244 = queryWeight, product of:
4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
0.05083213 = queryNorm
0.67591333 = fieldWeight in 157, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=157)
0.039873123 = product of:
0.07974625 = sum of:
0.07974625 = weight(_text_:classification in 157) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07974625 = score(doc=157,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16188543 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.05083213 = queryNorm
0.49260917 = fieldWeight in 157, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=157)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
-
Broadbent, E.: Classification access in the online catalog (1995)
0.12
0.118014835 = product of:
0.17702225 = sum of:
0.12868872 = weight(_text_:index in 5571) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.12868872 = score(doc=5571,freq=8.0), product of:
0.2221244 = queryWeight, product of:
4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
0.05083213 = queryNorm
0.5793543 = fieldWeight in 5571, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5571)
0.048333526 = product of:
0.09666705 = sum of:
0.09666705 = weight(_text_:classification in 5571) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09666705 = score(doc=5571,freq=16.0), product of:
0.16188543 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.05083213 = queryNorm
0.5971325 = fieldWeight in 5571, product of:
4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
16.0 = termFreq=16.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5571)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- With the development during the last few years of the USMARC Format for Classification Data, the potential for improving call number browsing in online catalogs has increased dramatically. For example, it is now possible to create various types of indexes to classification numbers in the online catalog. Two types of possible indexes, a chain index and an index using Library of Congress subject headings as an index to the Library of Congress classification are discussed and examples given in appendices. It is also noted that these two indexes are only two of various forms an online index to classification numbers could take.
- Footnote
- Paper presented at the 36th Allerton Institute, 23-25 Oct 94, Allerton Park, Monticello, IL: "New Roles for Classification in Libraries and Information Networks: Presentation and Reports"
- Object
- USMARC for classification data
- Source
- Cataloging and classification quarterly. 21(1995) no.2, S.119-142
-
Kinsella, J.: Classification and the OPAC (1992)
0.10
0.10438053 = product of:
0.15657079 = sum of:
0.1072406 = weight(_text_:index in 3903) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.1072406 = score(doc=3903,freq=2.0), product of:
0.2221244 = queryWeight, product of:
4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
0.05083213 = queryNorm
0.48279524 = fieldWeight in 3903, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3903)
0.049330197 = product of:
0.098660395 = sum of:
0.098660395 = weight(_text_:classification in 3903) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.098660395 = score(doc=3903,freq=6.0), product of:
0.16188543 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.05083213 = queryNorm
0.6094458 = fieldWeight in 3903, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3903)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Content
- Subject searching in the OPAC: success or failure? // Searching by numbers: the use of classification schemes in currently available OPACs // The wider picture: the role of classification in the future of subject searching
- Source
- Catalogue and index. 1992, nos.105/106, S.1,3-10
-
Mitchell, J.S.: In this age of WWW is classification redundant? (1998)
0.09
0.09116033 = product of:
0.13674049 = sum of:
0.08579248 = weight(_text_:index in 5443) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08579248 = score(doc=5443,freq=2.0), product of:
0.2221244 = queryWeight, product of:
4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
0.05083213 = queryNorm
0.3862362 = fieldWeight in 5443, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5443)
0.05094801 = product of:
0.10189602 = sum of:
0.10189602 = weight(_text_:classification in 5443) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.10189602 = score(doc=5443,freq=10.0), product of:
0.16188543 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.05083213 = queryNorm
0.6294329 = fieldWeight in 5443, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5443)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- Argues that classification systems have an important role to play in knowledge organization in the new world electronic order. The natural language approach is not incompatible with the use of a classification system and classification has untapped potential as a multilingual switching language. Librarians must learn to present classification systems in a language understood by a general audience and promote them as general knowledge organization tools
- Source
- Catalogue and index. 1998, no.127, S.5
-
Markey, K.; Demeyer, A.N.: Dewey Decimal Classification online project: evaluation of a library schedule and index integrated into the subject searching capabilities of an online catalog : final report to the Council of Library Resources (1986)
0.09
0.09048094 = product of:
0.1357214 = sum of:
0.1072406 = weight(_text_:index in 3472) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.1072406 = score(doc=3472,freq=2.0), product of:
0.2221244 = queryWeight, product of:
4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
0.05083213 = queryNorm
0.48279524 = fieldWeight in 3472, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3472)
0.028480802 = product of:
0.056961603 = sum of:
0.056961603 = weight(_text_:classification in 3472) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.056961603 = score(doc=3472,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16188543 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.05083213 = queryNorm
0.35186368 = fieldWeight in 3472, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3472)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
-
Golub, K.; Lykke, M.: Automated classification of web pages in hierarchical browsing (2009)
0.08
0.084783375 = product of:
0.12717506 = sum of:
0.075830564 = weight(_text_:index in 3614) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.075830564 = score(doc=3614,freq=4.0), product of:
0.2221244 = queryWeight, product of:
4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
0.05083213 = queryNorm
0.3413878 = fieldWeight in 3614, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3614)
0.0513445 = product of:
0.102689 = sum of:
0.102689 = weight(_text_:classification in 3614) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.102689 = score(doc=3614,freq=26.0), product of:
0.16188543 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.05083213 = queryNorm
0.63433135 = fieldWeight in 3614, product of:
5.0990195 = tf(freq=26.0), with freq of:
26.0 = termFreq=26.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3614)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- Purpose - The purpose of this study is twofold: to investigate whether it is meaningful to use the Engineering Index (Ei) classification scheme for browsing, and then, if proven useful, to investigate the performance of an automated classification algorithm based on the Ei classification scheme. Design/methodology/approach - A user study was conducted in which users solved four controlled searching tasks. The users browsed the Ei classification scheme in order to examine the suitability of the classification systems for browsing. The classification algorithm was evaluated by the users who judged the correctness of the automatically assigned classes. Findings - The study showed that the Ei classification scheme is suited for browsing. Automatically assigned classes were on average partly correct, with some classes working better than others. Success of browsing showed to be correlated and dependent on classification correctness. Research limitations/implications - Further research should address problems of disparate evaluations of one and the same web page. Additional reasons behind browsing failures in the Ei classification scheme also need further investigation. Practical implications - Improvements for browsing were identified: describing class captions and/or listing their subclasses from start; allowing for searching for words from class captions with synonym search (easily provided for Ei since the classes are mapped to thesauri terms); when searching for class captions, returning the hierarchical tree expanded around the class in which caption the search term is found. The need for improvements of classification schemes was also indicated. Originality/value - A user-based evaluation of automated subject classification in the context of browsing has not been conducted before; hence the study also presents new findings concerning methodology.
- Object
- Engineering Index Classification
-
Svenonius, E.; Liu, S.; Subrahmanyam, B.: Automation of chain indexing (1992)
0.08
0.080396526 = product of:
0.120594785 = sum of:
0.09099667 = weight(_text_:index in 2114) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09099667 = score(doc=2114,freq=4.0), product of:
0.2221244 = queryWeight, product of:
4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
0.05083213 = queryNorm
0.40966535 = fieldWeight in 2114, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2114)
0.029598119 = product of:
0.059196237 = sum of:
0.059196237 = weight(_text_:classification in 2114) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.059196237 = score(doc=2114,freq=6.0), product of:
0.16188543 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.05083213 = queryNorm
0.3656675 = fieldWeight in 2114, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2114)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- The last several years have seen the evolution of prototype systems exploiting the use of the Dewey Decimal Classification (DDC) as an interface to online catalogs. One such system, calles DORS (Dewy Online Retrieval System) was developed at the University of California, Los Angeles by the authors. The feature distinguishing this system is an automatically generated chain index, in particular the algorithms that were created for its automatic generation and the problems that were encountered. The problems were of three kinds: those that were overcome, but were not for lack of time and resources and those that we believe cannot be overcome. The paper concludes with suggestions for future resaerch and possible formatting changes to the DDC feature headings that would facilitate chain-index generation
- Source
- Classification research for knowledge representation and organization. Proc. 5th Int. Study Conf. on Classification Research, Toronto, Canada, 24.-28.6.1991. Ed. by N.J. Williamson u. M. Hudon
-
Liu, S.; Svenonius, E.: DORS: DDC online retrieval system (1991)
0.08
0.07867655 = product of:
0.11801483 = sum of:
0.08579248 = weight(_text_:index in 1155) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08579248 = score(doc=1155,freq=2.0), product of:
0.2221244 = queryWeight, product of:
4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
0.05083213 = queryNorm
0.3862362 = fieldWeight in 1155, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1155)
0.03222235 = product of:
0.0644447 = sum of:
0.0644447 = weight(_text_:classification in 1155) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0644447 = score(doc=1155,freq=4.0), product of:
0.16188543 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.05083213 = queryNorm
0.39808834 = fieldWeight in 1155, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1155)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- A model system, the Dewey Online Retrieval System (DORS), was implemented as an interface to an online catalog for the purpose of experimenting with classification-based search strategies and generally seeking further understanding of the role of traditional classifications in automated information retrieval. Specifications for a classification retrieval interface were enumerated and rationalized and the system was developed in accordance with them. The feature that particularly distinguishes the system and enables it to meet its stated specifications is an automatically generated chain index
-
National Seminar on Classification in the Digital Environment : Papers contributed to the National Seminar an Classification in the Digital Environment, Bangalore, 9-11 August 2001 (2001)
0.08
0.075549364 = product of:
0.113324046 = sum of:
0.02144812 = weight(_text_:index in 2047) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02144812 = score(doc=2047,freq=2.0), product of:
0.2221244 = queryWeight, product of:
4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
0.05083213 = queryNorm
0.09655905 = fieldWeight in 2047, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
0.015625 = fieldNorm(doc=2047)
0.091875926 = sum of:
0.07810182 = weight(_text_:classification in 2047) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07810182 = score(doc=2047,freq=94.0), product of:
0.16188543 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.05083213 = queryNorm
0.48245123 = fieldWeight in 2047, product of:
9.69536 = tf(freq=94.0), with freq of:
94.0 = termFreq=94.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.015625 = fieldNorm(doc=2047)
0.0137741035 = weight(_text_:22 in 2047) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0137741035 = score(doc=2047,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17800546 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05083213 = queryNorm
0.07738023 = fieldWeight in 2047, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.015625 = fieldNorm(doc=2047)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Date
- 2. 1.2004 10:35:22
- Footnote
- Rez. in: Knowledge organization 30(2003) no.1, S.40-42 (J.-E. Mai): "Introduction: This is a collection of papers presented at the National Seminar an Classification in the Digital Environment held in Bangalore, India, an August 9-11 2001. The collection contains 18 papers dealing with various issues related to knowledge organization and classification theory. The issue of transferring the knowledge, traditions, and theories of bibliographic classification to the digital environment is an important one, and I was excited to learn that proceedings from this seminar were available. Many of us experience frustration an a daily basis due to poorly constructed Web search mechanisms and Web directories. As a community devoted to making information easily accessible we have something to offer the Web community and a seminar an the topic was indeed much needed. Below are brief summaries of the 18 papers presented at the seminar. The order of the summaries follows the order of the papers in the proceedings. The titles of the paper are given in parentheses after the author's name. AHUJA and WESLEY (From "Subject" to "Need": Shift in Approach to Classifying Information an the Internet/Web) argue that traditional bibliographic classification systems fall in the digital environment. One problem is that bibliographic classification systems have been developed to organize library books an shelves and as such are unidimensional and tied to the paper-based environment. Another problem is that they are "subject" oriented in the sense that they assume a relatively stable universe of knowledge containing basic and fixed compartments of knowledge that can be identified and represented. Ahuja and Wesley suggest that classification in the digital environment should be need-oriented instead of subjectoriented ("One important link that binds knowledge and human being is his societal need. ... Hence, it will be ideal to organise knowledge based upon need instead of subject." (p. 10)).
AHUJA and SATIJA (Relevance of Ranganathan's Classification Theory in the Age of Digital Libraries) note that traditional bibliographic classification systems have been applied in the digital environment with only limited success. They find that the "inherent flexibility of electronic manipulation of documents or their surrogates should allow a more organic approach to allocation of new subjects and appropriate linkages between subject hierarchies." (p. 18). Ahija and Satija also suggest that it is necessary to shift from a "subject" focus to a "need" focus when applying classification theory in the digital environment. They find Ranganathan's framework applicable in the digital environment. Although Ranganathan's focus is "subject oriented and hence emphasise the hierarchical and linear relationships" (p. 26), his framework "can be successfully adopted with certain modifications ... in the digital environment." (p. 26). SHAH and KUMAR (Model for System Unification of Geographical Schedules (Space Isolates)) report an a plan to develop a single schedule for geographical Subdivision that could be used across all classification systems. The authors argue that this is needed in order to facilitate interoperability in the digital environment. SAN SEGUNDO MANUEL (The Representation of Knowledge as a Symbolization of Productive Electronic Information) distills different approaches and definitions of the term "representation" as it relates to representation of knowledge in the library and information science literature and field. SHARADA (Linguistic and Document Classification: Paradigmatic Merger Possibilities) suggests the development of a universal indexing language. The foundation for the universal indexing language is Chomsky's Minimalist Program and Ranganathan's analytico-synthetic classification theory; Acording to the author, based an these approaches, it "should not be a problem" (p. 62) to develop a universal indexing language.
SELVI (Knowledge Classification of Digital Information Materials with Special Reference to Clustering Technique) finds that it is essential to classify digital material since the amount of material that is becoming available is growing. Selvi suggests using automated classification to "group together those digital information materials or documents that are "most similar" (p. 65). This can be attained by using Cluster analysis methods. PRADHAN and THULASI (A Study of the Use of Classification and Indexing Systems by Web Resource Directories) compare and contrast the classificatory structures of Google, Yahoo, and Looksmart's directories and compare the directories to Dewey Decimal Classification, Library of Congress Classification and Colon Classification's classificatory structures. They find differentes between the directories' and the bibliographic classification systems' classificatory structures and principles. These differentes stem from the fact that bibliographic classification systems are used to "classify academic resources for the research community" (p. 83) and directories "aim to categorize a wider breath of information groups, entertainment, recreation, govt. information, commercial information" (p. 83). NEELAMEGHAN (Hierarchy, Hierarchical Relation and Hierarchical Arrangement) reviews the concept of hierarchy and the formation of hierarchical structures across a variety of domains. NEELAMEGHAN and PRADAD (Digitized Schemes for Subject Classification and Thesauri: Complementary Roles) demonstrate how thesaural relationships (NT, BT, and RT) can be applied to a classification scheme, the Colon Classification in this Gase. NEELAMEGHAN and ASUNDI (Metadata Framework for Describing Embodied Knowledge and Subject Content) propose to use the Generalized Facet Structure framework which is based an Ranganathan's General Theory of Knowledge Classification as a framework for describing the content of documents in a metadata element set for the representation of web documents. CHUDAMANI (Classified Catalogue as a Tool for Subject Based Information Retrieval in both Traditional and Electronic Library Environment) explains why the classified catalogue is superior to the alphabetic cata logue and argues that the same is true in the digital environment.
PARAMESWARAN (Classification and Indexing: Impact of Classification Theory an PRECIS) reviews the PRECIS system and finds that "it Gould not escape from the impact of the theory of classification" (p. 131). The author further argues that the purpose of classification and subject indexing is the same and that both approaches depends an syntax. This leads to the conclusion that "there is an absolute syntax as the Indian theory of classification points out" (p. 131). SATYAPAL and SANJIVINI SATYAPAL (Classifying Documents According to Postulational Approach: 1. SA TSAN- A Computer Based Learning Package) and SATYAPAL and SANJIVINI SATYAPAL (Classifying Documents According to Postulational Approach: 2. Semi-Automatic Synthesis of CC Numbers) present an application to automate classification using a facet classification system, in this Gase, the Colon Classification system. GAIKAIWARI (An Interactive Application for Faceted Classification Systems) presents an application, called SRR, for managing and using a faceted classification scheme in a digital environment. IYER (Use of Instructional Technology to Support Traditional Classroom Learning: A Case Study) describes a course an "Information and Knowledge Organization" that she teaches at the University at Albany (SUNY). The course is a conceptual course that introduces the student to various aspects of knowledge organization. GOPINATH (Universal Classification: How can it be used?) lists fifteen uses of universal classifications and discusses the entities of a number of disciplines. GOPINATH (Knowledge Classification: The Theory of Classification) briefly reviews the foundations for research in automatic classification, summarizes the history of classification, and places Ranganathan's thought in the history of classification.
Discussion The proceedings of the National Seminar an Classification in the Digital Environment give some insights. However, the depth of analysis and discussion is very uneven across the papers. Some of the papers have substantive research content while others appear to be notes used in the oral presentation. The treatments of the topics are very general in nature. Some papers have a very limited list of references while others have no bibliography. No index has been provided. The transfer of bibliographic knowledge organization theory to the digital environment is an important topic. However, as the papers at this conference have shown, it is also a difficult task. Of the 18 papers presented at this seminar an classification in the digital environment, only 4-5 papers actually deal directly with this important topic. The remaining papers deal with issues that are more or less relevant to classification in the digital environment without explicitly discussing the relation. The reason could be that the authors take up issues in knowledge organization that still need to be investigated and clarified before their application in the digital environment can be considered. Nonetheless, one wishes that the knowledge organization community would discuss the application of classification theory in the digital environment in greater detail. It is obvious from the comparisons of the classificatory structures of bibliographic classification systems and Web directories that these are different and that they probably should be different, since they serve different purposes. Interesting questions in the transformation of bibliographic classification theories to the digital environment are: "Given the existing principles in bibliographic knowledge organization, what are the optimum principles for organization of information, irrespectively of context?" and "What are the fundamental theoretical and practical principles for the construction of Web directories?" Unfortunately, the papers presented at this seminar do not attempt to answer or discuss these questions."
-
Ardo, A.; Lundberg, S.: ¬A regional distributed WWW search and indexing service : the DESIRE way (1998)
0.07
0.07443855 = product of:
0.11165782 = sum of:
0.09099667 = weight(_text_:index in 4190) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09099667 = score(doc=4190,freq=4.0), product of:
0.2221244 = queryWeight, product of:
4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
0.05083213 = queryNorm
0.40966535 = fieldWeight in 4190, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4190)
0.020661155 = product of:
0.04132231 = sum of:
0.04132231 = weight(_text_:22 in 4190) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04132231 = score(doc=4190,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17800546 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05083213 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4190, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4190)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- Creates an open, metadata aware system for distributed, collaborative WWW indexing. The system has 3 main components: a harvester (for collecting information), a database (for making the collection searchable), and a user interface (for making the information available). all components can be distributed across networked computers, thus supporting scalability. The system is metadata aware and thus allows searches on several fields including title, document author and URL. Nordic Web Index (NWI) is an application using this system to create a regional Nordic Web-indexing service. NWI is built using 5 collaborating service points within the Nordic countries. The NWI databases can be used to build additional services
- Date
- 1. 8.1996 22:08:06
- Object
- Nordic Web Index
-
Slavic, A.; Cordeiro, M.I.: Core requirements for automation of analytico-synthetic classifications (2004)
0.07
0.070801616 = product of:
0.10620242 = sum of:
0.06434436 = weight(_text_:index in 2651) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06434436 = score(doc=2651,freq=2.0), product of:
0.2221244 = queryWeight, product of:
4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
0.05083213 = queryNorm
0.28967714 = fieldWeight in 2651, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2651)
0.041858062 = product of:
0.083716124 = sum of:
0.083716124 = weight(_text_:classification in 2651) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.083716124 = score(doc=2651,freq=12.0), product of:
0.16188543 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.05083213 = queryNorm
0.5171319 = fieldWeight in 2651, product of:
3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
12.0 = termFreq=12.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2651)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- The paper analyses the importance of data presentation and modelling and its role in improving the management, use and exchange of analytico-synthetic classifications in automated systems. Inefficiencies, in this respect, hinder the automation of classification systems that offer the possibility of building compound index/search terms. The lack of machine readable data expressing the semantics and structure of a classification vocabulary has negative effects on information management and retrieval, thus restricting the potential of both automated systems and classifications themselves. The authors analysed the data representation structure of three general analytico-synthetic classification systems (BC2-Bliss Bibliographic Classification; BSO-Broad System of Ordering; UDC-Universal Decimal Classification) and put forward some core requirements for classification data representation
-
Markey, K.: Searching and browsing the Dewey Decimal Classification in an online catalog (1987)
0.07
0.068370245 = product of:
0.102555364 = sum of:
0.06434436 = weight(_text_:index in 384) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06434436 = score(doc=384,freq=2.0), product of:
0.2221244 = queryWeight, product of:
4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
0.05083213 = queryNorm
0.28967714 = fieldWeight in 384, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=384)
0.038211007 = product of:
0.07642201 = sum of:
0.07642201 = weight(_text_:classification in 384) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07642201 = score(doc=384,freq=10.0), product of:
0.16188543 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.05083213 = queryNorm
0.4720747 = fieldWeight in 384, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=384)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- In the DDC Online Project, subject searching and browsing of DDC schedules and relative index were featured in an experimental online catalog. The effectiveness of this DDC in an online catalog was tested in online retrieval experiments at four participating libraries. These experiments provided data for analyses of subject searchers' use of a library classification in the information retrieval environment of an online catalog. Recommendations were provided for the enhancement of bibliographic records, online catalogs, and online cataloging systems with a library classification. In this paper, subject searchers' use of the subject outline search capability of the experimental online catalog is described. This capability was unique to the experimental online catalog and all other online catalogs, because it referred searchers to online displays of the classification schedules based on their entry of subject terms. Failure analyses of subject outline searches demonstrated its specific strenghts and weaknesses. Users' postsearch interview comments highlighted their experiences and their satisfaction with this search. Based on the failure analyses and users' interview comments, recommendations are provided for the improvement of the subject outline search in online catalogs.
- Source
- Cataloging and classification quarterly. 7(1987) no.3, S.37-68
-
Hill, J.S.: Online classification number access : some practical considerations (1984)
0.07
0.067110464 = product of:
0.20133139 = sum of:
0.20133139 = sum of:
0.091138564 = weight(_text_:classification in 7684) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.091138564 = score(doc=7684,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16188543 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.05083213 = queryNorm
0.5629819 = fieldWeight in 7684, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=7684)
0.11019283 = weight(_text_:22 in 7684) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.11019283 = score(doc=7684,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17800546 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05083213 = queryNorm
0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 7684, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=7684)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Source
- Journal of academic librarianship. 10(1984), S.17-22
-
Oberhauser, O.: Implementierung und Parametrisierung klassifikatorischer Recherchekomponenten im OPAC (2005)
0.06
0.06474842 = product of:
0.09712263 = sum of:
0.05308139 = weight(_text_:index in 3353) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05308139 = score(doc=3353,freq=4.0), product of:
0.2221244 = queryWeight, product of:
4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
0.05083213 = queryNorm
0.23897146 = fieldWeight in 3353, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=3353)
0.044041242 = sum of:
0.019936562 = weight(_text_:classification in 3353) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.019936562 = score(doc=3353,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16188543 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.05083213 = queryNorm
0.12315229 = fieldWeight in 3353, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=3353)
0.02410468 = weight(_text_:22 in 3353) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02410468 = score(doc=3353,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17800546 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05083213 = queryNorm
0.1354154 = fieldWeight in 3353, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=3353)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- Das in den letzten Jahren wiedererwachte Interesse an der klassifikatorischen Erschließung und Recherche hat sich allem Anschein nach noch nicht ausreichend bis zu den Herstellern integrierter Bibliothekssysteme herumgesprochen. Wie wäre es sonst zu erklären, dass im OPAC-Modul eines führenden Systems wie Aleph 500 so gut wie keine Features für klassifikationsbasierte Recherchen zu erblicken sind? Tatsächlich finden wir heute einen im Vergleich zum einstigen System Bibos kaum veränderten Zustand vor: Notationen eines oder mehrerer Klassifikationssysteme können in einer durch MAB dafür bestimmten Kategorie (700, nebst Indikatoren) katalogisiert und dann recherchiert bzw. angezeigt werden. Doch welcher Benutzer weiß schon, was diese Notationen im einzelnen bedeuten? Wer macht sich die Mühe, dies selbst herauszufinden, um dann danach zu recherchieren? Hier liegt im wesentlich dasselbe Problem vor, das schon dem systematischen Zettelkatalog anhaftete und ihn zu einem zwar mühevoll erstellten, aber wenig genutzten Rechercheinstrument machte, das nur dann (zwangsläufig) angenommen wurde, wenn ein verbaler Sachkatalog fehlte. Nun könnte eingewandt werden, dass im Vergleich zu früher unter Aleph 500 wenigstens das Aufblättern von Indizes möglich sei, sodass im OPAC ein Index für die vergebenen Notationen angeboten werden kann (bzw. mehrere solche Indizes bei Verwendung von mehr als nur einem Klassifikationssystem). Gewiss, doch was bringt dem Uneingeweihten das Aufblättern des Notationsindex - außer einer alphabetischen Liste von kryptischen Codes? Weiter könnte man einwenden, dass es im Aleph-500-OPAC die so genannten Suchdienste ("services") gibt, mithilfe derer von bestimmten Elementen einer Vollanzeige hypertextuell weiternavigiert werden kann. Richtig, doch damit kann man bloß wiederum den Index aufblättern oder alle anderen Werke anzeigen lassen, die dieselbe Notationen - also einen Code, dessen Bedeutung meist unbekannt ist - aufweisen. Wie populär mag dieses Feature beim Publikum wohl sein? Ein anderer Einwand wäre der Hinweis auf das inzwischen vom Hersteller angebotene Thesaurus-Modul, das vermutlich auch für Klassifikationssysteme eingesetzt werden könnte. Doch wie viele Bibliotheken unseres Verbundes waren bisher bereit, für dieses Modul, das man eigentlich als Bestandteil des Basissystems erwarten könnte, gesondert zu bezahlen? Schließlich mag man noch einwenden, dass es im Gegensatz zur Bibos-Zeit nun die Möglichkeit gibt, Systematiken und Klassifikationen als Normdateien zu implementieren und diese beim Retrieval für verbale Einstiege in die klassifikatorische Recherche oder zumindest für die Veranschaulichung der Klassenbenennungen in der Vollanzeige zu nutzen. Korrekt - dies ist möglich und wurde sogar einst für die MSC (Mathematics Subject Classification, auch bekannt als "AMS-Klassifikation") versucht. Dieses Projekt, das noch unter der Systemversion 11.5 begonnen wurde, geriet jedoch nach einiger Zeit ins Stocken und fand bedauerlicherweise nie seinen Weg in die folgende Version (14.2). Mag auch zu hoffen sein, dass es unter der neuen Version 16 wieder weitergeführt werden kann, so weist dieses Beispiel doch auf die grundsätzliche Problematik des Normdatei-Ansatzes (zusätzlicher Aufwand, Kontinuität) hin. Zudem lohnt sich die Implementierung einer eigenen Normdatei 4 wohl nur bei einem größeren bzw. komplexen Klassifikationssystem, wogegen man im Falle kleinerer Systematiken kaum daran denken würde.
- Source
- Mitteilungen der Vereinigung Österreichischer Bibliothekarinnen und Bibliothekare. 58(2005) H.1, S.22-37
-
Classification research for knowledge representation and organization : Proc. of the 5th Int. Study Conf. on Classification Research, Toronto, Canada, 24.-28.6.1991 (1992)
0.06
0.06153138 = product of:
0.09229707 = sum of:
0.045498334 = weight(_text_:index in 2072) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.045498334 = score(doc=2072,freq=4.0), product of:
0.2221244 = queryWeight, product of:
4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
0.05083213 = queryNorm
0.20483267 = fieldWeight in 2072, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=2072)
0.046798736 = product of:
0.09359747 = sum of:
0.09359747 = weight(_text_:classification in 2072) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09359747 = score(doc=2072,freq=60.0), product of:
0.16188543 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.05083213 = queryNorm
0.5781711 = fieldWeight in 2072, product of:
7.745967 = tf(freq=60.0), with freq of:
60.0 = termFreq=60.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=2072)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- This volume deals with both theoretical and empirical research in classification and encompasses universal classification systems, special classification systems, thesauri and the place of classification in a broad spectrum of document and information systems. Papers fall into one or three major areas as follows: 1) general principles and policies 2) structure and logic in classification; and empirical investigation; classification in the design of various types of document/information systems. The papers originate from the ISCCR '91 conference and have been selected according to the following criteria: relevance to the conference theme; importance of the topic in the representation and organization of knowledge; quality; and originality in terms of potential contribution to research and new knowledge.
- Content
- Enthält die Beiträge: SVENONIUS, E.: Classification: prospects, problems, and possibilities; BEALL, J.: Editing the Dewey Decimal Classification online: the evolution of the DDC database; BEGHTOL, C.: Toward a theory of fiction analysis for information storage and retrieval; CRAVEN, T.C.: Concept relation structures and their graphic display; FUGMANN, R.: Illusory goals in information science research; GILCHRIST, A.: UDC: the 1990's and beyond; GREEN, R.: The expression of syntagmatic relationships in indexing: are frame-based index languages the answer?; HUMPHREY, S.M.: Use and management of classification systems for knowledge-based indexing; MIKSA, F.L.: The concept of the universe of knowledge and the purpose of LIS classification; SCOTT, M. u. A.F. FONSECA: Methodology for functional appraisal of records and creation of a functional thesaurus; ALBRECHTSEN, H.: PRESS: a thesaurus-based information system for software reuse; AMAESHI, B.: A preliminary AAT compatible African art thesaurus; CHATTERJEE, A.: Structures of Indian classification systems of the pre-Ranganathan era and their impact on the Colon Classification; COCHRANE, P.A.: Indexing and searching thesauri, the Janus or Proteus of information retrieval; CRAVEN, T.C.: A general versus a special algorithm in the graphic display of thesauri; DAHLBERG, I.: The basis of a new universal classification system seen from a philosophy of science point of view: DRABENSTOTT, K.M., RIESTER, L.C. u. B.A.DEDE: Shelflisting using expert systems; FIDEL, R.: Thesaurus requirements for an intermediary expert system; GREEN, R.: Insights into classification from the cognitive sciences: ramifications for index languages; GROLIER, E. de: Towards a syndetic information retrieval system; GUENTHER, R.: The USMARC format for classification data: development and implementation; HOWARTH, L.C.: Factors influencing policies for the adoption and integration of revisions to classification schedules; HUDON, M.: Term definitions in subject thesauri: the Canadian literacy thesaurus experience; HUSAIN, S.: Notational techniques for the accomodation of subjects in Colon Classification 7th edition: theoretical possibility vis-à-vis practical need; KWASNIK, B.H. u. C. JORGERSEN: The exploration by means of repertory grids of semantic differences among names of official documents; MICCO, M.: Suggestions for automating the Library of Congress Classification schedules; PERREAULT, J.M.: An essay on the prehistory of general categories (II): G.W. Leibniz, Conrad Gesner; REES-POTTER, L.K.: How well do thesauri serve the social sciences?; REVIE, C.W. u. G. SMART: The construction and the use of faceted classification schema in technical domains; ROCKMORE, M.: Structuring a flexible faceted thsaurus record for corporate information retrieval; ROULIN, C.: Sub-thesauri as part of a metathesaurus; SMITH, L.C.: UNISIST revisited: compatibility in the context of collaboratories; STILES, W.G.: Notes concerning the use chain indexing as a possible means of simulating the inductive leap within artificial intelligence; SVENONIUS, E., LIU, S. u. B. SUBRAHMANYAM: Automation in chain indexing; TURNER, J.: Structure in data in the Stockshot database at the National Film Board of Canada; VIZINE-GOETZ, D.: The Dewey Decimal Classification as an online classification tool; WILLIAMSON, N.J.: Restructuring UDC: problems and possibilies; WILSON, A.: The hierarchy of belief: ideological tendentiousness in universal classification; WILSON, B.F.: An evaluation of the systematic botany schedule of the Universal Decimal Classification (English full edition, 1979); ZENG, L.: Research and development of classification and thesauri in China; CONFERENCE SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS
- Footnote
- Rez. in: International classification 19(1992) no.4, S.228-229 (B.C. Vickery); Journal of classification 11(1994) no.2, S.255-256 (W. Gödert)
- LCSH
- Classification / Congresses
- Subject
- Classification / Congresses
-
Comaromi, C.L.: Summation of classification as an enhancement of intellectual access to information in an online environment (1990)
0.06
0.060931247 = product of:
0.18279374 = sum of:
0.18279374 = sum of:
0.11392321 = weight(_text_:classification in 3576) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.11392321 = score(doc=3576,freq=8.0), product of:
0.16188543 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.05083213 = queryNorm
0.70372736 = fieldWeight in 3576, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3576)
0.06887052 = weight(_text_:22 in 3576) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06887052 = score(doc=3576,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17800546 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05083213 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 3576, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3576)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- Classification structure and indexes to classifications need to be better understood before classification can be a major access point in online catalogs.
- Date
- 8. 1.2007 12:22:40
- Source
- Cataloging and classification quarterly. 11(1990) no.1, S.99-102
-
Lim, E.: Southeast Asian subject gateways : an examination of their classification practices (2000)
0.05
0.05033285 = product of:
0.15099855 = sum of:
0.15099855 = sum of:
0.06835393 = weight(_text_:classification in 6040) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06835393 = score(doc=6040,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16188543 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.05083213 = queryNorm
0.42223644 = fieldWeight in 6040, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6040)
0.08264462 = weight(_text_:22 in 6040) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08264462 = score(doc=6040,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17800546 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05083213 = queryNorm
0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 6040, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6040)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Date
- 22. 6.2002 19:42:47
-
Devadason, F.J.; Intaraksa, N.; Patamawongjariya, P.; Desai, K.: Faceted indexing based system for organizing and accessing Internet resources (2002)
0.05
0.048678637 = product of:
0.073017955 = sum of:
0.05308139 = weight(_text_:index in 97) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05308139 = score(doc=97,freq=4.0), product of:
0.2221244 = queryWeight, product of:
4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
0.05083213 = queryNorm
0.23897146 = fieldWeight in 97, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=97)
0.019936562 = product of:
0.039873123 = sum of:
0.039873123 = weight(_text_:classification in 97) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.039873123 = score(doc=97,freq=8.0), product of:
0.16188543 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.05083213 = queryNorm
0.24630459 = fieldWeight in 97, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=97)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- Organizing and providing access to the resources an the Internet has been a problem area in spite of the availability of sophisticated search engines and other Software tools. There have been several attempts to organize the resources an the World Wide Web. Some of them have tried to use traditional library classification schemes such as the Library of Congress Classification, the Dewey Decimal Classification and others. However there is a need to assign proper subject headings to them and present them in a logical or hierarchical sequence to cater to the need for browsing. This paper attempts to describe an experimental system designed to organize and provide access to web documents using a faceted pre-coordinate indexing system based an the Deep Structure Indexing System (DSIS) derived from POPSI (Postulate based Permuted Subject Indexing) of Bhattacharyya, and the facet analysis and chain indexing system of Ranganathan. A prototype Software System has been designed to create a database of records specifying Web documents according to the Dublin Core and to input a faceted subject heading according to DSIS. Synonymous terms are added to the Standard terms in the heading using appropriate symbols. Once the data are entered along with a description and the URL of the web document, the record is stored in the System. More than one faceted subject heading can be assigned to a record depending an the content of the original document. The System stores the Surrogates and keeps the faceted subject headings separately after establishing a link. The search is carried out an index entries derived from the faceted subject heading using the chain indexing technique. If a single term is Input, the System searches for its presence in the faceted subject headings and displays the subject headings in a sorted sequence reflecting an organizing sequence. If the number of retrieved Keadings is too large (running into more than a page) the user has the option of entering another search term to be searched in combination. The System searches subject headings already retrieved and looks for those containing the second term. The retrieved faceted subject headings can be displayed and browsed. When the relevant subject heading is selected the system displays the records with their URLs. Using the URL, the original document an the web can be accessed. The prototype system developed in a Windows NT environment using ASP and a web server is under rigorous testing. The database and Index management routines need further development.
An interesting but somewhat confusing article telling how the writers described web pages with Dublin Core metadata, including a faceted classification, and built a system that lets users browse the collection through the facets. They seem to want to cover too much in a short article, and unnecessary space is given over to screen shots showing how Dublin Core metadata was entered. The screen shots of the resulting browsable system are, unfortunately, not as enlightening as one would hope, and there is no discussion of how the system was actually written or the technology behind it. Still, it could be worth reading as an example of such a system and how it is treated in journals.
-
Dack, D.: Australian attends conference on Dewey (1989)
0.05
0.04578946 = product of:
0.13736838 = sum of:
0.13736838 = sum of:
0.08915902 = weight(_text_:classification in 2509) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08915902 = score(doc=2509,freq=10.0), product of:
0.16188543 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.05083213 = queryNorm
0.55075383 = fieldWeight in 2509, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2509)
0.04820936 = weight(_text_:22 in 2509) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04820936 = score(doc=2509,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17800546 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05083213 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2509, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2509)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- Edited version of a report to the Australian Library and Information Association on the Conference on classification theory in the computer age, Albany, New York, 18-19 Nov 88, and on the meeting of the Dewey Editorial Policy Committee which preceded it. The focus of the Editorial Policy Committee Meeting lay in the following areas: browsing; potential for improved subject access; system design; potential conflict between shelf location and information retrieval; and users. At the Conference on classification theory in the computer age the following papers were presented: Applications of artificial intelligence to bibliographic classification, by Irene Travis; Automation and classification, By Elaine Svenonious; Subject classification and language processing for retrieval in large data bases, by Diana Scott; Implications for information processing, by Carol Mandel; and implications for information science education, by Richard Halsey.
- Date
- 8.11.1995 11:52:22
-
Tudhope, D.; Binding, C.; Blocks, D.; Cuncliffe, D.: Representation and retrieval in faceted systems (2003)
0.05
0.04524047 = product of:
0.0678607 = sum of:
0.0536203 = weight(_text_:index in 2703) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0536203 = score(doc=2703,freq=2.0), product of:
0.2221244 = queryWeight, product of:
4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
0.05083213 = queryNorm
0.24139762 = fieldWeight in 2703, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2703)
0.014240401 = product of:
0.028480802 = sum of:
0.028480802 = weight(_text_:classification in 2703) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.028480802 = score(doc=2703,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16188543 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.05083213 = queryNorm
0.17593184 = fieldWeight in 2703, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2703)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- This paper discusses two inter-related themes: the retrieval potential of faceted thesauri and XML representations of fundamental facets. Initial findings are discussed from the ongoing 'FACET' project, in collaboration with the National Museum of Science and Industry. The work discussed seeks to take advantage of the structure afforded by faceted systems for multi-term queries and flexible matching, focusing in this paper an the Art and Architecture Thesaurus. A multi-term matching function yields ranked results with partial matches via semantic term expansion, based an a measure of distance over the semantic index space formed by thesaurus relationships. Our intention is to drive the system from general representations and a common query structure and interface. To this end, we are developing an XML representation based an work by the Classification Research Group an fundamental facets or categories. The XML representation maps categories to particular thesauri and hierarchies. The system interface, which is configured by the mapping, incorporates a thesaurus browser with navigation history together with a term search facility and drag and drop query builder.
