Search (36 results, page 2 of 2)

  • × type_ss:"r"
  1. Drewer, P.; Massion, F; Pulitano, D: Was haben Wissensmodellierung, Wissensstrukturierung, künstliche Intelligenz und Terminologie miteinander zu tun? (2017) 0.02
    0.01750997 = product of:
      0.03501994 = sum of:
        0.03501994 = product of:
          0.07003988 = sum of:
            0.07003988 = weight(_text_:22 in 5576) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07003988 = score(doc=5576,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18102784 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051695216 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 5576, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5576)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    13.12.2017 14:17:22
  2. Hodge, G.: Systems of knowledge organization for digital libraries : beyond traditional authority files (2000) 0.02
    0.017231649 = product of:
      0.034463298 = sum of:
        0.034463298 = product of:
          0.068926595 = sum of:
            0.068926595 = weight(_text_:2000 in 4723) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.068926595 = score(doc=4723,freq=3.0), product of:
                0.20949209 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.0524464 = idf(docFreq=2088, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051695216 = queryNorm
                0.32901764 = fieldWeight in 4723, product of:
                  1.7320508 = tf(freq=3.0), with freq of:
                    3.0 = termFreq=3.0
                  4.0524464 = idf(docFreq=2088, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4723)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Year
    2000
  3. Stein, R.; Gottschewski, J.; Heuchert, R.; Ermert, A.; Hagedorn-Saupe, M.; Hansen, H.-J.; Saro, C.; Scheffel, R.; Schulte-Dornberg, G.: ¬Das CIDOC Conceptual Reference Model : Eine Hilfe für den Datenaustausch? (2005) 0.01
    0.014069581 = product of:
      0.028139163 = sum of:
        0.028139163 = product of:
          0.056278326 = sum of:
            0.056278326 = weight(_text_:2000 in 3741) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.056278326 = score(doc=3741,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.20949209 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.0524464 = idf(docFreq=2088, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051695216 = queryNorm
                0.26864177 = fieldWeight in 3741, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.0524464 = idf(docFreq=2088, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3741)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Mit dieser Publikation veröffentlicht das Institut für Museumskunde die bisherigen Arbeitsergebnisse der Arbeitsgruppe "Datenaustausch" in der Fachgruppe Dokumentation des Deutschen Museumsbunds (DMB). Kolleginnen und Kollegen verschiedener Interessenschwerpunkte aus Museen und Informatik-Einrichtungen haben seit dem Jahre 2000 die Entwicklung des CIDOC-CRM (das "Conceptual Reference Model" des Dokumentationskomitees von ICOM, dem Internationalen Museumsrat) zu einem Arbeitsinstrument begleitet, das derzeit auf dem Wege ist, als Norm ISO 21 127 Anerkennung zu finden. Die Arbeitsgruppe hat sich intensiv damit beschäftigt, zunächst das komplexe Modell zu verstehen, und sie hat diskutiert, inwieweit es eine Hilfestellung für die Arbeit von Museen miteinander und für einen Datenaustausch zwischen ihnen bietet. Die Ergebnisse der Überlegungen werden hier vorgestellt in der Hoffnung, dass dadurch viele Kolleginnen und Kollegen mit dem Modell bekannt werden, ihnen das Verständnis des CRM erleichtert wird und das Modell auch in Deutschland für die Konzeption von Informationssystemen und die Vermittlung zwischen unterschiedlichen Dokumentationen genutzt werden kann.
  4. Tober, M.; Hennig, L.; Furch, D.: SEO Ranking-Faktoren und Rang-Korrelationen 2014 : Google Deutschland (2014) 0.01
    0.014007976 = product of:
      0.028015953 = sum of:
        0.028015953 = product of:
          0.056031905 = sum of:
            0.056031905 = weight(_text_:22 in 1484) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.056031905 = score(doc=1484,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18102784 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051695216 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1484, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1484)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    13. 9.2014 14:45:22
  5. Nohr, H.: Wissen und Wissensprozesse visualisieren (2000) 0.01
    0.01297681 = product of:
      0.02595362 = sum of:
        0.02595362 = product of:
          0.05190724 = sum of:
            0.05190724 = weight(_text_:2000 in 2974) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.05190724 = score(doc=2974,freq=5.0), product of:
                0.20949209 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.0524464 = idf(docFreq=2088, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051695216 = queryNorm
                0.24777663 = fieldWeight in 2974, product of:
                  2.236068 = tf(freq=5.0), with freq of:
                    5.0 = termFreq=5.0
                  4.0524464 = idf(docFreq=2088, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=2974)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Series
    Arbeitspapiere Wissensmanagement; 2000/1
    Year
    2000
  6. Deokattey, S.; Sharma, S.B.K.; Kumar, G.R.; Bhanumurthy, K.: Knowledge organization research : an overview (2015) 0.01
    0.012256979 = product of:
      0.024513958 = sum of:
        0.024513958 = product of:
          0.049027916 = sum of:
            0.049027916 = weight(_text_:22 in 2092) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.049027916 = score(doc=2092,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18102784 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051695216 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2092, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2092)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 6.2015 16:13:38
  7. Electronic publishing practice in the UK (1994) 0.01
    0.011724652 = product of:
      0.023449304 = sum of:
        0.023449304 = product of:
          0.046898607 = sum of:
            0.046898607 = weight(_text_:2000 in 8028) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.046898607 = score(doc=8028,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.20949209 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.0524464 = idf(docFreq=2088, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051695216 = queryNorm
                0.22386816 = fieldWeight in 8028, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.0524464 = idf(docFreq=2088, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=8028)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Report of a project commissioned by British Library Research and Development Department (BLRDD) from Electronic Publishing Services Ltd designed to provide factual input about electronic publishing in the UK for a worlking party convened by the British Library as part of a follow up to the Information 2000 exercise, completed in 1991. The working party will consider the possible impacts on the library community of the development of electronic publishing. For the purpose of this study, electronic publishing was defined as including: online services (including videotex); magnetic tape services; magnetic disk products; CD-ROM and other optical disc products; ROM cards; and electronic periodicals. The main conclusions were: that the dominant position of Reuters and other financial information services means that online information retrieval still accounts for the vast majority of electronic publishing revenues; that CD-ROM is experiencing high growth, but growth from a small base and coming later than predicted; that network publishing is still in the experimental stage and almost entirely funded from the public sector; that ROM cards, which provide the medium for hand held electronic reference books are still present in the market and represent the only mass market channel; and that other electronic media (magnetic tape, magnetic disk, analogue videodisc) are not seen as having a significant part to play
  8. Feldsien-Sudhaus, I.; Horst, D.; Katzner, E.; Rajski, B.; Weier, H.; Zeumer, T. (Red.): Koha-Evaluation durch die Universitätsbibliothek der TUHH (2015) 0.01
    0.011724652 = product of:
      0.023449304 = sum of:
        0.023449304 = product of:
          0.046898607 = sum of:
            0.046898607 = weight(_text_:2000 in 2811) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.046898607 = score(doc=2811,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.20949209 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.0524464 = idf(docFreq=2088, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051695216 = queryNorm
                0.22386816 = fieldWeight in 2811, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.0524464 = idf(docFreq=2088, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2811)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Die Universitätsbibliothek der TUHH setzt seit 1996 auf die Softwareunterstützung für Ausleihe und Katalog. Zunächst wurde das integrierte Bibliothekssystem SISIS eingesetzt, 2000 erfolgte der Wechsel auf das Lokale Bibliothekssystem LBS4 von PICA, heute OCLC. Kurz darauf wurde die Erwerbung integriert. Seit Ende der 90er Jahre wird in der Bibliothek Selbstverbuchung angeboten, seit 2011 mit RFID. 2012 wurde der Nutzer-Katalog des LBS4 durch TUBfind, ein Discovery System auf vufind-Basis, abgelöst. Keine Softwarelösung gibt es bisher für die Verwaltung elektronischer Ressourcen mit Ausnahme des Linkresolvers SFX von Exlibris, der seit 2006 eingesetzt wird. Die TUB ist Mitglied im Gemeinsamen Bibliotheksverbund (GBV) und nutzt die zentrale Katalogisierungsdatenbank CBS. Das LBS4 hat in den letzten 15 Jahren kaum funktionale Erweiterungen erfahren. Funktionen für die Verwaltung für Elektronische Ressourcen fehlen genauso wie Standardschnittstellen, z.B. zu LDAP-Directories. Mittelfristig muss das LBS4 im GBV und damit auch an der TUB durch ein anderes Bibliotheksmanagementsystem (BMS) abgelöst werden. Die Verbundzentrale des GBV (VZG) testet daher zusammen mit der FAG Lokale Geschäftsgänge und dem HBZ das noch in der Entwicklung befindliche Kuali OLE, ein Cloud- und Community-basiertes BMS aus den USA. In diesem Bericht werden unsere Projektergebnisse dargestellt, Vergleiche zum LBS4 gezogen und offene Fragen festgehalten.
  9. ELINOR : Electronic Library Project (1998) 0.01
    0.010505982 = product of:
      0.021011963 = sum of:
        0.021011963 = product of:
          0.042023927 = sum of:
            0.042023927 = weight(_text_:22 in 1404) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.042023927 = score(doc=1404,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18102784 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051695216 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1404, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1404)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Series
    British Library Research and Innovation Centre (BLRIC) report; 22
  10. McCormick, A.; Sutton, A.: Open learning and the Internet in public libraries (1998) 0.01
    0.010505982 = product of:
      0.021011963 = sum of:
        0.021011963 = product of:
          0.042023927 = sum of:
            0.042023927 = weight(_text_:22 in 3685) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.042023927 = score(doc=3685,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18102784 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051695216 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3685, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3685)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 5.1999 18:55:19
  11. Sykes, J.: Making solid business decisions through intelligent indexing taxonomies : a white paper prepared for Factiva, Factiva, a Dow Jones and Reuters Company (2003) 0.01
    0.009379721 = product of:
      0.018759442 = sum of:
        0.018759442 = product of:
          0.037518885 = sum of:
            0.037518885 = weight(_text_:2000 in 721) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.037518885 = score(doc=721,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.20949209 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.0524464 = idf(docFreq=2088, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051695216 = queryNorm
                0.17909452 = fieldWeight in 721, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.0524464 = idf(docFreq=2088, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=721)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    In 2000, Factiva published "The Value of Indexing," a white paper emphasizing the strategic importance of accurate categorization, based on a robust taxonomy for later retrieval of documents stored in commercial or in-house content repositories. Since that time, there has been resounding agreement between persons who use Web-based systems and those who design these systems that search engines alone are not the answer for effective information retrieval. High-quality categorization is crucial if users are to be able to find the right answers in repositories of articles and documents that are expanding at phenomenal rates. Companies continue to invest in technologies that will help them organize and integrate their content. A March 2002 article in EContent suggests a typical taxonomy implementation usually costs around $100,000. The article also cites a Merrill Lynch study that predicts the market for search and categorization products, now at about $600 million, will more than double by 2005. Classification activities are not new. In the third century B.C., Callimachus of Cyrene managed the ancient Library of Alexandria. To help scholars find items in the collection, he created an index of all the scrolls organized according to a subject taxonomy. Factiva's parent companies, Dow Jones and Reuters, each have more than 20 years of experience with developing taxonomies and painstaking manual categorization processes and also have a solid history with automated categorization techniques. This experience and expertise put Factiva at the leading edge of developing and applying categorization technology today. This paper will update readers about enhancements made to the Factiva Intelligent IndexingT taxonomy. It examines the value these enhancements bring to Factiva's news and business information service, and the value brought to clients who license the Factiva taxonomy as a fundamental component of their own Enterprise Knowledge Architecture. There is a behind-the-scenes-look at how Factiva classifies a huge stream of incoming articles published in a variety of formats and languages. The paper concludes with an overview of new Factiva services and solutions that are designed specifically to help clients improve productivity and make solid business decisions by precisely finding information in their own everexpanding content repositories.
  12. Forschen für die Internet-Gesellschaft : Trends, Technologien, Anwendungen, Trends und Handlungsempfehlungen 2008 des Feldafinger Kreises (2008) 0.01
    0.009379721 = product of:
      0.018759442 = sum of:
        0.018759442 = product of:
          0.037518885 = sum of:
            0.037518885 = weight(_text_:2000 in 2337) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.037518885 = score(doc=2337,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.20949209 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.0524464 = idf(docFreq=2088, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051695216 = queryNorm
                0.17909452 = fieldWeight in 2337, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.0524464 = idf(docFreq=2088, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2337)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Ausgangslage: Im April 2000 haben führende Repräsentanten der deutschen Wissenschaftsorganisationen und der Bundesverband der Deutschen Industrie (BDI) beschlossen, gemeinsame Strategien zur Stärkung des Standorts Deutschland im globalen Innovationswettbewerb zu entwickeln. Weil entscheidende Impulse für Innovationen von der Zusammenarbeit zwischen öffentlicher Forschung und privaten Unternehmen ausgehen, muss dieser Prozess durch mehr Autonomie und Wettbewerb von Hochschulen und Forschungsinstituten und durch intensive Kommunikation und Kooperation weiter verbessert werden. Ziel sollte sein, die Partner aus unterschiedlichen wissenschaftlichen Disziplinen und aus allen Branchen der Wirtschaft noch besser ins Gespräch zu bringen, um Defizite bei der Umsetzung von Forschungsergebnissen in innovative Produkte, Dienste und Verfahren abzubauen. Um den Dialog zwischen Wissenschaft und Gesellschaft zu intensivieren, haben die Spitzenorganisationen von Wissenschaft und Industrie gemeinsame Symposien auf den Gebieten "Energie", "Lebenswissenschaften" und "Internet-Gesellschaft" beschlossen. Von diesen Symposien sollen Impulse für die Ermittlung des künftigen Forschungsbedarfs und entsprechende Handlungsempfehlungen für diese Gebiete höchster volkswirtschaftlicher Relevanz ausgehen. Stellvertretend für die Wissenschaftsorganisationen hat die Fraunhofer-Gesellschaft gemeinsam mit dem BDI die Ausrichtung des Symposiums zur Internet-Gesellschaft organisiert und finanziell unterstützt.
  13. Positionspapier zur Weiterentwicklung der Bibliotheksverbünde als Teil einer überregionalen Informationsinfrastruktur (2011) 0.01
    0.008754985 = product of:
      0.01750997 = sum of:
        0.01750997 = product of:
          0.03501994 = sum of:
            0.03501994 = weight(_text_:22 in 4291) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03501994 = score(doc=4291,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18102784 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051695216 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 4291, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4291)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    7. 2.2011 19:52:22
  14. Förderung von Informationsinfrastrukturen für die Wissenschaft : Ein Positionspapier der Deutschen Forschungsgemeinschaft (2018) 0.01
    0.008754985 = product of:
      0.01750997 = sum of:
        0.01750997 = product of:
          0.03501994 = sum of:
            0.03501994 = weight(_text_:22 in 4178) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03501994 = score(doc=4178,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18102784 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051695216 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 4178, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4178)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 3.2018 17:30:43
  15. Wehling, E.: Framing-Manual : Unser gemeinsamer freier Rundfunk ARD (2019) 0.01
    0.008754985 = product of:
      0.01750997 = sum of:
        0.01750997 = product of:
          0.03501994 = sum of:
            0.03501994 = weight(_text_:22 in 4997) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03501994 = score(doc=4997,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18102784 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051695216 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 4997, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4997)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 2.2019 9:26:20
  16. Hochschule im digitalen Zeitalter : Informationskompetenz neu begreifen - Prozesse anders steuern (2012) 0.01
    0.007003988 = product of:
      0.014007976 = sum of:
        0.014007976 = product of:
          0.028015953 = sum of:
            0.028015953 = weight(_text_:22 in 506) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.028015953 = score(doc=506,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18102784 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051695216 = queryNorm
                0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 506, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=506)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    8.12.2012 17:22:26

Years

Languages

  • d 18
  • e 17

Types