Search (213 results, page 1 of 11)

  • × theme_ss:"Suchtaktik"
  1. Wang, P.; Ma, Y.; Xie, H.; Wang, H.; Lu, J.; Xu, J.: "There is a gorilla holding a key on the book cover" : young children's known picture book search strategies (2022) 0.14
    0.14025271 = product of:
      0.21037906 = sum of:
        0.1542928 = weight(_text_:book in 443) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.1542928 = score(doc=443,freq=16.0), product of:
            0.2237077 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.414126 = idf(docFreq=1454, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050679956 = queryNorm
            0.68970716 = fieldWeight in 443, product of:
              4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
                16.0 = termFreq=16.0
              4.414126 = idf(docFreq=1454, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=443)
        0.056086253 = product of:
          0.11217251 = sum of:
            0.11217251 = weight(_text_:search in 443) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.11217251 = score(doc=443,freq=22.0), product of:
                0.17614716 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.475677 = idf(docFreq=3718, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050679956 = queryNorm
                0.6368113 = fieldWeight in 443, product of:
                  4.690416 = tf(freq=22.0), with freq of:
                    22.0 = termFreq=22.0
                  3.475677 = idf(docFreq=3718, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=443)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    There is no information search system can assist young children's known picture book search needs since the information is not organized according to their cognitive abilities and needs. Therefore, this study explored young children's known picture book search strategies and extracted picture book search elements by simulating a search scenario and playing a picture book search game. The study found 29 elements children used to search for known picture books. Then, these elements are classified into three dimensions: The first dimension is the concept category of an element. The second dimension is an element's status in the story. The third dimension indicates where an element appears in a picture book. Additionally, it revealed a young children's general search strategy: Children first use auditory elements that they hear from the adults during reading. After receiving error returns, they add visual elements that they see by themselves in picture books. The findings can not only help to understand young children's known-item search and reformulation strategies during searching but also provide theoretical support for the development of a picture book information organization schema in the search system.
  2. Pejtersen, A.M.: ¬The Book House : Modelling user's needs and search strategies as a basis for system design (1989) 0.11
    0.11433822 = product of:
      0.17150733 = sum of:
        0.1309218 = weight(_text_:book in 1033) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.1309218 = score(doc=1033,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.2237077 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.414126 = idf(docFreq=1454, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050679956 = queryNorm
            0.58523595 = fieldWeight in 1033, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.414126 = idf(docFreq=1454, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1033)
        0.04058554 = product of:
          0.08117108 = sum of:
            0.08117108 = weight(_text_:search in 1033) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08117108 = score(doc=1033,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17614716 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.475677 = idf(docFreq=3718, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050679956 = queryNorm
                0.460814 = fieldWeight in 1033, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.475677 = idf(docFreq=3718, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1033)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
  3. Pejtersen, A.M.: ¬A new approach to design of document retrieval and indexing systems for OPAC users (1993) 0.09
    0.092593215 = product of:
      0.13888982 = sum of:
        0.12197917 = weight(_text_:book in 1300) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.12197917 = score(doc=1300,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.2237077 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.414126 = idf(docFreq=1454, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050679956 = queryNorm
            0.5452614 = fieldWeight in 1300, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              4.414126 = idf(docFreq=1454, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1300)
        0.016910642 = product of:
          0.033821285 = sum of:
            0.033821285 = weight(_text_:search in 1300) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.033821285 = score(doc=1300,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17614716 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.475677 = idf(docFreq=3718, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050679956 = queryNorm
                0.19200584 = fieldWeight in 1300, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.475677 = idf(docFreq=3718, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1300)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    This paper describes a new OPAC system called The Book House and discusses its relevance as a solution to current OPAC developments. The Book House is an interactive, multimedia, online public access catalogue system designed to support casual and/or novice end-users in information retrieval. It runs on a Macintosh and is available on CD-ROM and disks in English and Danish (it can be purchased from Risø for $100). It comprises an interface and module for classifying and indexing fact and fiction books in the database called Book House Write. It uses icons, text and animation in the display interface in order to enhance the utility of the system for the general public. Both words and pictures can be used for searching, which makes the system suitable for all age groups. It plays on users' previous experiencees with computer games to support learning by doing something in an enjoyable way. A prerequisite for the design of The Book House was a new approach to cognitive analysis of retrieval in libraries. Based on the success of this approach, it is claimed that OPAC systems will only be really useful and widespread (1) when their domain and task characteristics allow supplementary information to be added to existing descriptions of book content in online card catalogues in order to match end-users' intentions and needs, and (2) when the user interface and routes to the databases are configured as an integrated and uniform set of displays which match the search strategies of users, as well as their mental capabilities and limitations
  4. Stacey, Alison; Stacey, Adrian: Effective information retrieval from the Internet : an advanced user's guide (2004) 0.09
    0.08930281 = product of:
      0.13395421 = sum of:
        0.10689719 = weight(_text_:book in 4497) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.10689719 = score(doc=4497,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.2237077 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.414126 = idf(docFreq=1454, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050679956 = queryNorm
            0.47784314 = fieldWeight in 4497, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              4.414126 = idf(docFreq=1454, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4497)
        0.027057027 = product of:
          0.054114055 = sum of:
            0.054114055 = weight(_text_:search in 4497) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.054114055 = score(doc=4497,freq=8.0), product of:
                0.17614716 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.475677 = idf(docFreq=3718, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050679956 = queryNorm
                0.30720934 = fieldWeight in 4497, product of:
                  2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                    8.0 = termFreq=8.0
                  3.475677 = idf(docFreq=3718, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4497)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    This book provides practical strategies which enable the advanced web user to locate information effectively and to form a precise evaluation of the accuracy of that information. Although the book provides a brief but thorough review of the technologies which are currently available for these purposes, most of the book concerns practical `future-proof' techniques which are independent of changes in the tools available. For example, the book covers: how to retrieve salient information quickly; how to remove or compensate for bias; and tuition of novice Internet users.
    Content
    Key Features - Importantly, the book enables readers to develop strategies which will continue to be useful despite the rapidly-evolving state of the Internet and Internet technologies - it is not about technological `tricks'. - Enables readers to be aware of and compensate for bias and errors which are ubiquitous an the Internet. - Provides contemporary information an the deficiencies in web skills of novice users as well as practical techniques for teaching such users. The Authors Dr Alison Stacey works at the Learning Resource Centre, Cambridge Regional College. Dr Adrian Stacey, formerly based at Cambridge University, is a software programmer. Readership The book is aimed at a wide range of librarians and other information professionals who need to retrieve information from the Internet efficiently, to evaluate their confidence in the information they retrieve and/or to train others to use the Internet. It is primarily aimed at intermediate to advanced users of the Internet. Contents Fundamentals of information retrieval from the Internet - why learn web searching technique; types of information requests; patterns for information retrieval; leveraging the technology: Search term choice: pinpointing information an the web - why choose queries carefully; making search terms work together; how to pick search terms; finding the 'unfindable': Blas an the Internet - importance of bias; sources of bias; usergenerated bias: selecting information with which you already agree; assessing and compensating for bias; case studies: Query reformulation and longer term strategies - how to interact with your search engine; foraging for information; long term information retrieval: using the Internet to find trends; automating searches: how to make your machine do your work: Assessing the quality of results- how to assess and ensure quality: The novice user and teaching internet skills - novice users and their problems with the web; case study: research in a college library; interpreting 'second hand' web information.
  5. Hoeber, O.: Human-centred Web search (2012) 0.09
    0.08642151 = product of:
      0.12963226 = sum of:
        0.0654609 = weight(_text_:book in 102) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0654609 = score(doc=102,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.2237077 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.414126 = idf(docFreq=1454, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050679956 = queryNorm
            0.29261798 = fieldWeight in 102, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.414126 = idf(docFreq=1454, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=102)
        0.064171374 = product of:
          0.12834275 = sum of:
            0.12834275 = weight(_text_:search in 102) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.12834275 = score(doc=102,freq=20.0), product of:
                0.17614716 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.475677 = idf(docFreq=3718, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050679956 = queryNorm
                0.72861093 = fieldWeight in 102, product of:
                  4.472136 = tf(freq=20.0), with freq of:
                    20.0 = termFreq=20.0
                  3.475677 = idf(docFreq=3718, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=102)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    People commonly experience difficulties when searching the Web, arising from an incomplete knowledge regarding their information needs, an inability to formulate accurate queries, and a low tolerance for considering the relevance of the search results. While simple and easy to use interfaces have made Web search universally accessible, they provide little assistance for people to overcome the difficulties they experience when their information needs are more complex than simple fact-verification. In human-centred Web search, the purpose of the search engine expands from a simple information retrieval engine to a decision support system. People are empowered to take an active role in the search process, with the search engine supporting them in developing a deeper understanding of their information needs, assisting them in crafting and refining their queries, and aiding them in evaluating and exploring the search results. In this chapter, recent research in this domain is outlined and discussed.
    Footnote
    Vgl.: http://www.igi-global.com/book/next-generation-search-engines/64427.
    Source
    Next generation search engines: advanced models for information retrieval. Eds.: C. Jouis, u.a
  6. Xie, I.: Information searching and search models (2009) 0.08
    0.081905015 = product of:
      0.12285752 = sum of:
        0.0654609 = weight(_text_:book in 3821) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0654609 = score(doc=3821,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.2237077 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.414126 = idf(docFreq=1454, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050679956 = queryNorm
            0.29261798 = fieldWeight in 3821, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.414126 = idf(docFreq=1454, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3821)
        0.05739662 = product of:
          0.11479324 = sum of:
            0.11479324 = weight(_text_:search in 3821) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.11479324 = score(doc=3821,freq=16.0), product of:
                0.17614716 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.475677 = idf(docFreq=3718, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050679956 = queryNorm
                0.6516894 = fieldWeight in 3821, product of:
                  4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
                    16.0 = termFreq=16.0
                  3.475677 = idf(docFreq=3718, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3821)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    Key terms related to information searching and search models are defined. A historic context is provided to illustrate the evolution of the four main digital environments that users interact with in their search process to offer readers background information regarding the transition from manual information systems to computer-based information retrieval (IR) systems, as well as the transition from intermediary searching to end-user searching. Emphasis is placed on the review of different levels of information searching from search tactics/moves, search strategies, and usage patterns, to search models and associated factors in relation to task, user knowledge structure, IR system design, and social-organization context. Search models are further classified into two types, with one type illustrating information search process (ISP) and the other type emphasizing the factors that influence the process. In addition, unsolved problems and future research are discussed and suggested.
    Footnote
    Vgl.: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/book/10.1081/E-ELIS3.
  7. Morse, P.M.: Search theory and browsing (1970) 0.07
    0.07269703 = product of:
      0.21809107 = sum of:
        0.21809107 = sum of:
          0.10822811 = weight(_text_:search in 1448) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.10822811 = score(doc=1448,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17614716 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.475677 = idf(docFreq=3718, maxDocs=44218)
                0.050679956 = queryNorm
              0.6144187 = fieldWeight in 1448, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.475677 = idf(docFreq=3718, maxDocs=44218)
                0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=1448)
          0.10986295 = weight(_text_:22 in 1448) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.10986295 = score(doc=1448,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17747258 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.050679956 = queryNorm
              0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 1448, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=1448)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    22. 5.2005 19:53:09
  8. Kuhlthau, C.C.: Information search process (ISP) model (2009) 0.07
    0.067072675 = product of:
      0.100609004 = sum of:
        0.0654609 = weight(_text_:book in 3819) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0654609 = score(doc=3819,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.2237077 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.414126 = idf(docFreq=1454, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050679956 = queryNorm
            0.29261798 = fieldWeight in 3819, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.414126 = idf(docFreq=1454, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3819)
        0.03514811 = product of:
          0.07029622 = sum of:
            0.07029622 = weight(_text_:search in 3819) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07029622 = score(doc=3819,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.17614716 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.475677 = idf(docFreq=3718, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050679956 = queryNorm
                0.39907667 = fieldWeight in 3819, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  3.475677 = idf(docFreq=3718, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3819)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    The information search process (ISP) is a six-stage model of the users' holistic experience in the process of information seeking. The ISP model, based on two decades of empirical research, identifies three realms of experience: the affective (feelings), the cognitive (thoughts), and the physical (actions) common to each stage. These studies were among the first to investigate the affective aspects or the feelings of a person in the process of information seeking along with the cognitive and physical aspects. Central to the ISP is the notion that uncertainty, both affective and cognitive, increases and decreases in the process of information seeking. A principle of uncertainty for information seeking is proposed that states that information commonly increases uncertainty in the early stages of the search process. Increased uncertainty indicates a zone of intervention for intermediaries and system designers.
    Footnote
    Vgl.: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/book/10.1081/E-ELIS3.
  9. Habernal, I.; Konopík, M.; Rohlík, O.: Question answering (2012) 0.07
    0.067072675 = product of:
      0.100609004 = sum of:
        0.0654609 = weight(_text_:book in 101) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0654609 = score(doc=101,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.2237077 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.414126 = idf(docFreq=1454, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050679956 = queryNorm
            0.29261798 = fieldWeight in 101, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.414126 = idf(docFreq=1454, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=101)
        0.03514811 = product of:
          0.07029622 = sum of:
            0.07029622 = weight(_text_:search in 101) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07029622 = score(doc=101,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.17614716 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.475677 = idf(docFreq=3718, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050679956 = queryNorm
                0.39907667 = fieldWeight in 101, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  3.475677 = idf(docFreq=3718, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=101)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    Question Answering is an area of information retrieval with the added challenge of applying sophisticated techniques to identify the complex syntactic and semantic relationships present in text in order to provide a more sophisticated and satisfactory response to the user's information needs. For this reason, the authors see question answering as the next step beyond standard information retrieval. In this chapter state of the art question answering is covered focusing on providing an overview of systems, techniques and approaches that are likely to be employed in the next generations of search engines. Special attention is paid to question answering using the World Wide Web as the data source and to question answering exploiting the possibilities of Semantic Web. Considerations about the current issues and prospects for promising future research are also provided.
    Footnote
    Vgl.: http://www.igi-global.com/book/next-generation-search-engines/64431.
    Source
    Next generation search engines: advanced models for information retrieval. Eds.: C. Jouis, u.a
  10. Morse, P.M.: Browsing and search theory (1973) 0.06
    0.0636099 = product of:
      0.19082968 = sum of:
        0.19082968 = sum of:
          0.0946996 = weight(_text_:search in 3339) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.0946996 = score(doc=3339,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17614716 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.475677 = idf(docFreq=3718, maxDocs=44218)
                0.050679956 = queryNorm
              0.5376164 = fieldWeight in 3339, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.475677 = idf(docFreq=3718, maxDocs=44218)
                0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3339)
          0.09613008 = weight(_text_:22 in 3339) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.09613008 = score(doc=3339,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17747258 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.050679956 = queryNorm
              0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 3339, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3339)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    22. 5.2005 19:52:29
  11. Grau, B.: Finding answers to questions, in text collections or Web, in open domain or specialty domains (2012) 0.05
    0.052310668 = product of:
      0.078466 = sum of:
        0.05455074 = weight(_text_:book in 107) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05455074 = score(doc=107,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.2237077 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.414126 = idf(docFreq=1454, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050679956 = queryNorm
            0.2438483 = fieldWeight in 107, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.414126 = idf(docFreq=1454, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=107)
        0.023915261 = product of:
          0.047830522 = sum of:
            0.047830522 = weight(_text_:search in 107) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.047830522 = score(doc=107,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.17614716 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.475677 = idf(docFreq=3718, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050679956 = queryNorm
                0.27153727 = fieldWeight in 107, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.475677 = idf(docFreq=3718, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=107)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Footnote
    Vgl.: http://www.igi-global.com/book/next-generation-search-engines/64432.
    Source
    Next generation search engines: advanced models for information retrieval. Eds.: C. Jouis, u.a
  12. Wu, I.-C.; Vakkari, P.: Effects of subject-oriented visualization tools on search by novices and intermediates (2018) 0.05
    0.047094822 = product of:
      0.14128447 = sum of:
        0.14128447 = sum of:
          0.10695229 = weight(_text_:search in 4573) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.10695229 = score(doc=4573,freq=20.0), product of:
              0.17614716 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.475677 = idf(docFreq=3718, maxDocs=44218)
                0.050679956 = queryNorm
              0.60717577 = fieldWeight in 4573, product of:
                4.472136 = tf(freq=20.0), with freq of:
                  20.0 = termFreq=20.0
                3.475677 = idf(docFreq=3718, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4573)
          0.034332175 = weight(_text_:22 in 4573) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.034332175 = score(doc=4573,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17747258 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.050679956 = queryNorm
              0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 4573, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4573)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    This study explores how user subject knowledge influences search task processes and outcomes, as well as how search behavior is influenced by subject-oriented information visualization (IV) tools. To enable integrated searches, the proposed WikiMap + integrates search functions and IV tools (i.e., a topic network and hierarchical topic tree) and gathers information from Wikipedia pages and Google Search results. To evaluate the effectiveness of the proposed interfaces, we design subject-oriented tasks and adopt extended evaluation measures. We recruited 48 novices and 48 knowledgeable users, that is, intermediates, for the evaluation. Our results show that novices using the proposed interface demonstrate better search performance than intermediates using Wikipedia. We therefore conclude that our tools help close the gap between novices and intermediates in information searches. The results also show that intermediates can take advantage of the search tool by leveraging the IV tools to browse subtopics, and formulate better queries with less effort. We conclude that embedding the IV and the search tools in the interface can result in different search behavior but improved task performance. We provide implications to design search systems to include IV features adapted to user levels of subject knowledge to help them achieve better task performance.
    Date
    9.12.2018 16:22:25
  13. Pejtersen, A.M.: Design of a classification scheme for fiction based on an analysis of actual user-librarian communication, and use of the scheme for control of librarians' search strategies (1980) 0.05
    0.045435637 = product of:
      0.13630691 = sum of:
        0.13630691 = sum of:
          0.06764257 = weight(_text_:search in 5835) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.06764257 = score(doc=5835,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17614716 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.475677 = idf(docFreq=3718, maxDocs=44218)
                0.050679956 = queryNorm
              0.3840117 = fieldWeight in 5835, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.475677 = idf(docFreq=3718, maxDocs=44218)
                0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5835)
          0.06866435 = weight(_text_:22 in 5835) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.06866435 = score(doc=5835,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17747258 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.050679956 = queryNorm
              0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 5835, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5835)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    5. 8.2006 13:22:44
  14. Sachse, J.: ¬The influence of snippet length on user behavior in mobile web search (2019) 0.05
    0.045265343 = product of:
      0.13579603 = sum of:
        0.13579603 = sum of:
          0.10146385 = weight(_text_:search in 5493) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.10146385 = score(doc=5493,freq=18.0), product of:
              0.17614716 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.475677 = idf(docFreq=3718, maxDocs=44218)
                0.050679956 = queryNorm
              0.5760175 = fieldWeight in 5493, product of:
                4.2426405 = tf(freq=18.0), with freq of:
                  18.0 = termFreq=18.0
                3.475677 = idf(docFreq=3718, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5493)
          0.034332175 = weight(_text_:22 in 5493) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.034332175 = score(doc=5493,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17747258 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.050679956 = queryNorm
              0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 5493, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5493)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    Purpose Web search is more and more moving into mobile contexts. However, screen size of mobile devices is limited and search engine result pages face a trade-off between offering informative snippets and optimal use of space. One factor clearly influencing this trade-off is snippet length. The purpose of this paper is to find out what snippet size to use in mobile web search. Design/methodology/approach For this purpose, an eye-tracking experiment was conducted showing participants search interfaces with snippets of one, three or five lines on a mobile device to analyze 17 dependent variables. In total, 31 participants took part in the study. Each of the participants solved informational and navigational tasks. Findings Results indicate a strong influence of page fold on scrolling behavior and attention distribution across search results. Regardless of query type, short snippets seem to provide too little information about the result, so that search performance and subjective measures are negatively affected. Long snippets of five lines lead to better performance than medium snippets for navigational queries, but to worse performance for informational queries. Originality/value Although space in mobile search is limited, this study shows that longer snippets improve usability and user experience. It further emphasizes that page fold plays a stronger role in mobile than in desktop search for attention distribution.
    Date
    20. 1.2015 18:30:22
  15. Saastamoinen, M.; Järvelin, K.: Search task features in work tasks of varying types and complexity (2017) 0.04
    0.043983545 = product of:
      0.13195063 = sum of:
        0.13195063 = sum of:
          0.09075203 = weight(_text_:search in 3589) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.09075203 = score(doc=3589,freq=10.0), product of:
              0.17614716 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.475677 = idf(docFreq=3718, maxDocs=44218)
                0.050679956 = queryNorm
              0.51520574 = fieldWeight in 3589, product of:
                3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                  10.0 = termFreq=10.0
                3.475677 = idf(docFreq=3718, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3589)
          0.041198608 = weight(_text_:22 in 3589) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.041198608 = score(doc=3589,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17747258 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.050679956 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3589, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3589)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    Information searching in practice seldom is an end in itself. In work, work task (WT) performance forms the context, which information searching should serve. Therefore, information retrieval (IR) systems development/evaluation should take the WT context into account. The present paper analyzes how WT features: task complexity and task types, affect information searching in authentic work: the types of information needs, search processes, and search media. We collected data on 22 information professionals in authentic work situations in three organization types: city administration, universities, and companies. The data comprise 286 WTs and 420 search tasks (STs). The data include transaction logs, video recordings, daily questionnaires, interviews. and observation. The data were analyzed quantitatively. Even if the participants used a range of search media, most STs were simple throughout the data, and up to 42% of WTs did not include searching. WT's effects on STs are not straightforward: different WT types react differently to WT complexity. Due to the simplicity of authentic searching, the WT/ST types in interactive IR experiments should be reconsidered.
  16. Vakkari, P.; Pennanen, M.; Serola, S.: Changes of search terms and tactics while writing a research proposal : a longitudinal case study (2003) 0.04
    0.04333107 = product of:
      0.12999322 = sum of:
        0.12999322 = sum of:
          0.095661044 = weight(_text_:search in 1073) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.095661044 = score(doc=1073,freq=16.0), product of:
              0.17614716 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.475677 = idf(docFreq=3718, maxDocs=44218)
                0.050679956 = queryNorm
              0.54307455 = fieldWeight in 1073, product of:
                4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
                  16.0 = termFreq=16.0
                3.475677 = idf(docFreq=3718, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1073)
          0.034332175 = weight(_text_:22 in 1073) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.034332175 = score(doc=1073,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17747258 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.050679956 = queryNorm
              0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1073, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1073)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    The study analyses how students' growing understanding of the topic and search experience were related to their choice of search tactics and terms while preparing a research proposal for a small empirical study. In addition to that, the findings of the study are used to test Vakkari's (2001) theory of task-based IR. The research subjects were 22 students of psychology attending a seminar for preparing the proposal. They made a search for their task in PsychINFO database at the beginning and end of the seminar. Data were collected in several ways. A pre- and post-search interview was conducted in both sessions. The students were asked to think aloud in the sessions. This was recorded as were the transaction logs. The results show that search experience was slightly related to the change of facets. Although the students' vocabulary of the topic grew generating an increased use of specific terms between the sessions, their use of search tactics and operators remained fairly constant. There was no correlation between the terms and tactics used and the total number of useful references found. By comparing these results with the findings of relevant earlier studies the conclusion was drawn that domain knowledge has an impact on searching assuming that users have a sufficient command of the system used. This implies that the tested theory of task-based IR is valid on condition that the searchers are experienced. It is suggested that the theory should be enriched by including search experience in its scope.
  17. Renugadevi, S.; Geetha, T.V.; Gayathiri, R.L.; Prathyusha, S.; Kaviya, T.: Collaborative search using an implicitly formed academic network (2014) 0.04
    0.04167375 = product of:
      0.12502125 = sum of:
        0.12502125 = sum of:
          0.0975555 = weight(_text_:search in 1628) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.0975555 = score(doc=1628,freq=26.0), product of:
              0.17614716 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.475677 = idf(docFreq=3718, maxDocs=44218)
                0.050679956 = queryNorm
              0.55382955 = fieldWeight in 1628, product of:
                5.0990195 = tf(freq=26.0), with freq of:
                  26.0 = termFreq=26.0
                3.475677 = idf(docFreq=3718, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1628)
          0.027465738 = weight(_text_:22 in 1628) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.027465738 = score(doc=1628,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17747258 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.050679956 = queryNorm
              0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 1628, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1628)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to propose the Collaborative Search System that attempts to achieve collaboration by implicitly identifying and reflecting search behaviour of collaborators in an academic network that is automatically and dynamically formed. By using the constructed Collaborative Hit Matrix (CHM), results are obtained that are based on the search behaviour and earned preferences of specialist communities of researchers, which are relevant to the user's need and reduce the time spent on bad links. Design/methodology/approach - By using the Digital Bibliography Library Project (DBLP), the research communities are formed implicitly and dynamically based on the users' research presence in the search environment and in the publication scenario, which is also used to assign users' roles and establish links between the users. The CHM, to store the hit count and hit list of page results for queries, is also constructed and updated after every search session to enhance the collaborative search among the researchers. Findings - The implicit researchers community formation, the assignment and dynamic updating of roles of the researchers based on research, search presence and search behaviour on the web as well as the usage of these roles during Collaborative Web Search have highly improved the relevancy of results. The CHM that holds the collaborative responses provided by the researchers on the search query results to support searching distinguishes this system from others. Thus the proposed system considerably improves the relevancy and reduces the time spent on bad links, thus improving recall and precision. Originality/value - The research findings illustrate the better performance of the system, by connecting researchers working in the same field and allowing them to help each other in a web search environment.
    Date
    20. 1.2015 18:30:22
    Series
    Special issue: Semantic search
  18. Hsieh-Yee, I.: Search tactics of Web users in searching for texts, graphics, known items and subjects : a search simulation study (1998) 0.04
    0.0407899 = product of:
      0.12236969 = sum of:
        0.12236969 = sum of:
          0.08117108 = weight(_text_:search in 2404) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.08117108 = score(doc=2404,freq=8.0), product of:
              0.17614716 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.475677 = idf(docFreq=3718, maxDocs=44218)
                0.050679956 = queryNorm
              0.460814 = fieldWeight in 2404, product of:
                2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                  8.0 = termFreq=8.0
                3.475677 = idf(docFreq=3718, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2404)
          0.041198608 = weight(_text_:22 in 2404) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.041198608 = score(doc=2404,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17747258 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.050679956 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2404, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2404)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    Reports on a study of the search tactics used in searching the WWW and in dealing with difficulties such as too many postings and no relevant postings. Describes how the study was carried out, the analytical techniques used in it, and the results. Notes that with regard to tactics used to address search difficulties, no differences were found between searchers for texts and those for graphic information, and between those for known items and subject searches. Comments on the similarities and differences between the tactics used and and those used in online searching, including online catalogue searching
    Date
    25.12.1998 19:22:31
  19. Lin, S.-j.; Belkin, N.: Validation of a model of information seeking over multiple search sessions (2005) 0.04
    0.0407899 = product of:
      0.12236969 = sum of:
        0.12236969 = sum of:
          0.08117108 = weight(_text_:search in 3450) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.08117108 = score(doc=3450,freq=8.0), product of:
              0.17614716 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.475677 = idf(docFreq=3718, maxDocs=44218)
                0.050679956 = queryNorm
              0.460814 = fieldWeight in 3450, product of:
                2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                  8.0 = termFreq=8.0
                3.475677 = idf(docFreq=3718, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3450)
          0.041198608 = weight(_text_:22 in 3450) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.041198608 = score(doc=3450,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17747258 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.050679956 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3450, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3450)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    Most information systems share a common assumption: information seeking is discrete. Such an assumption neither reflects real-life information seeking processes nor conforms to the perspective of phenomenology, "life is a journey constituted by continuous acquisition of knowledge." Thus, this study develops and validates a theoretical model that explains successive search experience for essentially the same information problem. The proposed model is called Multiple Information Seeking Episodes (MISE), which consists of four dimensions: problematic situation, information problem, information seeking process, episodes. Eight modes of multiple information seeking episodes are identified and specified with properties of the four dimensions of MISE. The results partially validate MISE by finding that the original MISE model is highly accurate, but less sufficient in characterizing successive searches; all factors in the MISE model are empirically confirmed, but new factors are identified as weIl. The revised MISE model is shifted from the user-centered to the interaction-centered perspective, taking into account factors of searcher, system, search activity, search context, information attainment, and information use activities.
    Date
    10. 4.2005 14:52:22
  20. Drabenstott, K.M.: Web search strategies (2000) 0.04
    0.039067917 = product of:
      0.11720374 = sum of:
        0.11720374 = sum of:
          0.089738004 = weight(_text_:search in 1188) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.089738004 = score(doc=1188,freq=22.0), product of:
              0.17614716 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.475677 = idf(docFreq=3718, maxDocs=44218)
                0.050679956 = queryNorm
              0.50944906 = fieldWeight in 1188, product of:
                4.690416 = tf(freq=22.0), with freq of:
                  22.0 = termFreq=22.0
                3.475677 = idf(docFreq=3718, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1188)
          0.027465738 = weight(_text_:22 in 1188) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.027465738 = score(doc=1188,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17747258 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.050679956 = queryNorm
              0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 1188, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1188)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    Surfing the World Wide Web used to be cool, dude, real cool. But things have gotten hot - so hot that finding something useful an the Web is no longer cool. It is suffocating Web searchers in the smoke and debris of mountain-sized lists of hits, decisions about which search engines they should use, whether they will get lost in the dizzying maze of a subject directory, use the right syntax for the search engine at hand, enter keywords that are likely to retrieve hits an the topics they have in mind, or enlist a browser that has sufficient functionality to display the most promising hits. When it comes to Web searching, in a few short years we have gone from the cool image of surfing the Web into the frying pan of searching the Web. We can turn down the heat by rethinking what Web searchers are doing and introduce some order into the chaos. Web search strategies that are tool-based-oriented to specific Web searching tools such as search en gines, subject directories, and meta search engines-have been widely promoted, and these strategies are just not working. It is time to dissect what Web searching tools expect from searchers and adjust our search strategies to these new tools. This discussion offers Web searchers help in the form of search strategies that are based an strategies that librarians have been using for a long time to search commercial information retrieval systems like Dialog, NEXIS, Wilsonline, FirstSearch, and Data-Star.
    Content
    "Web searching is different from searching commercial IR systems. We can learn from search strategies recommended for searching IR systems, but most won't be effective for Web searching. Web searchers need strate gies that let search engines do the job they were designed to do. This article presents six new Web searching strategies that do just that."
    Date
    22. 9.1997 19:16:05

Years

Languages

  • e 209
  • d 1
  • ja 1
  • slv 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 201
  • m 7
  • el 3
  • s 2
  • r 1
  • More… Less…