Search (17 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × theme_ss:"Metadaten"
  • × year_i:[2010 TO 2020}
  1. Husevag, A.-S.R.: Named entities in indexing : a case study of TV subtitles and metadata records (2016) 0.03
    0.0273402 = product of:
      0.0546804 = sum of:
        0.0546804 = product of:
          0.1093608 = sum of:
            0.1093608 = weight(_text_:news in 3105) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.1093608 = score(doc=3105,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.26705483 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.2416887 = idf(docFreq=635, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05094824 = queryNorm
                0.40950692 = fieldWeight in 3105, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  5.2416887 = idf(docFreq=635, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3105)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    This paper explores the possible role of named entities in an automatic index-ing process, based on text in subtitles. This is done by analyzing entity types, name den-sity and name frequencies in subtitles and metadata records from different TV programs. The name density in metadata records is much higher than the name density in subtitles, and named entities with high frequencies in the subtitles are more likely to be mentioned in the metadata records. Personal names, geographical names and names of organizations where the most prominent entity types in both the news subtitles and news metadata, while persons, works and locations are the most prominent in culture programs.
  2. Kopácsi, S. et al.: Development of a classification server to support metadata harmonization in a long term preservation system (2016) 0.02
    0.017256958 = product of:
      0.034513917 = sum of:
        0.034513917 = product of:
          0.06902783 = sum of:
            0.06902783 = weight(_text_:22 in 3280) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06902783 = score(doc=3280,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17841205 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05094824 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 3280, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3280)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Metadata and semantics research: 10th International Conference, MTSR 2016, Göttingen, Germany, November 22-25, 2016, Proceedings. Eds.: E. Garoufallou
  3. Hajra, A. et al.: Enriching scientific publications from LOD repositories through word embeddings approach (2016) 0.02
    0.017256958 = product of:
      0.034513917 = sum of:
        0.034513917 = product of:
          0.06902783 = sum of:
            0.06902783 = weight(_text_:22 in 3281) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06902783 = score(doc=3281,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17841205 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05094824 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 3281, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3281)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Metadata and semantics research: 10th International Conference, MTSR 2016, Göttingen, Germany, November 22-25, 2016, Proceedings. Eds.: E. Garoufallou
  4. Mora-Mcginity, M. et al.: MusicWeb: music discovery with open linked semantic metadata (2016) 0.02
    0.017256958 = product of:
      0.034513917 = sum of:
        0.034513917 = product of:
          0.06902783 = sum of:
            0.06902783 = weight(_text_:22 in 3282) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06902783 = score(doc=3282,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17841205 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05094824 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 3282, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3282)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Metadata and semantics research: 10th International Conference, MTSR 2016, Göttingen, Germany, November 22-25, 2016, Proceedings. Eds.: E. Garoufallou
  5. Pomerantz, J.: Metadata (2015) 0.02
    0.015465952 = product of:
      0.030931905 = sum of:
        0.030931905 = product of:
          0.06186381 = sum of:
            0.06186381 = weight(_text_:news in 3800) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06186381 = score(doc=3800,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.26705483 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.2416887 = idf(docFreq=635, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05094824 = queryNorm
                0.2316521 = fieldWeight in 3800, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  5.2416887 = idf(docFreq=635, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3800)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    When "metadata" became breaking news, appearing in stories about surveillance by the National Security Agency, many members of the public encountered this once-obscure term from information science for the first time. Should people be reassured that the NSA was "only" collecting metadata about phone calls -- information about the caller, the recipient, the time, the duration, the location -- and not recordings of the conversations themselves? Or does phone call metadata reveal more than it seems? In this book, Jeffrey Pomerantz offers an accessible and concise introduction to metadata. In the era of ubiquitous computing, metadata has become infrastructural, like the electrical grid or the highway system. We interact with it or generate it every day. It is not, Pomerantz tell us, just "data about data." It is a means by which the complexity of an object is represented in a simpler form. For example, the title, the author, and the cover art are metadata about a book. When metadata does its job well, it fades into the background; everyone (except perhaps the NSA) takes it for granted. Pomerantz explains what metadata is, and why it exists. He distinguishes among different types of metadata -- descriptive, administrative, structural, preservation, and use -- and examines different users and uses of each type. He discusses the technologies that make modern metadata possible, and he speculates about metadata's future. By the end of the book, readers will see metadata everywhere. Because, Pomerantz warns us, it's metadata's world, and we are just living in it.
  6. White, H.: Examining scientific vocabulary : mapping controlled vocabularies with free text keywords (2013) 0.01
    0.013805566 = product of:
      0.027611133 = sum of:
        0.027611133 = product of:
          0.055222265 = sum of:
            0.055222265 = weight(_text_:22 in 1953) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.055222265 = score(doc=1953,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17841205 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05094824 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1953, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1953)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    29. 5.2015 19:09:22
  7. Alves dos Santos, E.; Mucheroni, M.L.: VIAF and OpenCitations : cooperative work as a strategy for information organization in the linked data era (2018) 0.01
    0.013805566 = product of:
      0.027611133 = sum of:
        0.027611133 = product of:
          0.055222265 = sum of:
            0.055222265 = weight(_text_:22 in 4826) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.055222265 = score(doc=4826,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17841205 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05094824 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4826, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4826)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    18. 1.2019 19:13:22
  8. Ilik, V.; Storlien, J.; Olivarez, J.: Metadata makeover (2014) 0.01
    0.01207987 = product of:
      0.02415974 = sum of:
        0.02415974 = product of:
          0.04831948 = sum of:
            0.04831948 = weight(_text_:22 in 2606) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04831948 = score(doc=2606,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17841205 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05094824 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2606, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2606)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  9. Metadata and semantics research : 10th International Conference, MTSR 2016, Göttingen, Germany, November 22-25, 2016, Proceedings (2016) 0.01
    0.01207987 = product of:
      0.02415974 = sum of:
        0.02415974 = product of:
          0.04831948 = sum of:
            0.04831948 = weight(_text_:22 in 3283) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04831948 = score(doc=3283,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17841205 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05094824 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 3283, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3283)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  10. Pfister, E.; Wittwer, B.; Wolff, M.: Metadaten - Manuelle Datenpflege vs. Automatisieren : ein Praxisbericht zu Metadatenmanagement an der ETH-Bibliothek (2017) 0.01
    0.01207987 = product of:
      0.02415974 = sum of:
        0.02415974 = product of:
          0.04831948 = sum of:
            0.04831948 = weight(_text_:22 in 5630) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04831948 = score(doc=5630,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17841205 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05094824 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 5630, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5630)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    B.I.T.online. 20(2017) H.1, S.22-25
  11. Baker, T.: Dublin Core Application Profiles : current approaches (2010) 0.01
    0.010354174 = product of:
      0.020708349 = sum of:
        0.020708349 = product of:
          0.041416697 = sum of:
            0.041416697 = weight(_text_:22 in 3737) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.041416697 = score(doc=3737,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17841205 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05094824 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3737, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3737)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Wissensspeicher in digitalen Räumen: Nachhaltigkeit - Verfügbarkeit - semantische Interoperabilität. Proceedings der 11. Tagung der Deutschen Sektion der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Wissensorganisation, Konstanz, 20. bis 22. Februar 2008. Hrsg.: J. Sieglerschmidt u. H.P.Ohly
  12. DeZelar-Tiedman, C.: Exploring user-contributed metadata's potential to enhance access to literary works (2011) 0.01
    0.010354174 = product of:
      0.020708349 = sum of:
        0.020708349 = product of:
          0.041416697 = sum of:
            0.041416697 = weight(_text_:22 in 2595) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.041416697 = score(doc=2595,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17841205 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05094824 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2595, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2595)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  13. Wartburg, K. von; Sibille, C.; Aliverti, C.: Metadata collaboration between the Swiss National Library and research institutions in the field of Swiss historiography (2019) 0.01
    0.010354174 = product of:
      0.020708349 = sum of:
        0.020708349 = product of:
          0.041416697 = sum of:
            0.041416697 = weight(_text_:22 in 5272) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.041416697 = score(doc=5272,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17841205 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05094824 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 5272, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5272)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    30. 5.2019 19:22:49
  14. Belém, F.M.; Almeida, J.M.; Gonçalves, M.A.: ¬A survey on tag recommendation methods : a review (2017) 0.01
    0.008628479 = product of:
      0.017256958 = sum of:
        0.017256958 = product of:
          0.034513917 = sum of:
            0.034513917 = weight(_text_:22 in 3524) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.034513917 = score(doc=3524,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17841205 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05094824 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 3524, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3524)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    16.11.2017 13:30:22
  15. Cho, H.; Donovan, A.; Lee, J.H.: Art in an algorithm : a taxonomy for describing video game visual styles (2018) 0.01
    0.008628479 = product of:
      0.017256958 = sum of:
        0.017256958 = product of:
          0.034513917 = sum of:
            0.034513917 = weight(_text_:22 in 4218) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.034513917 = score(doc=4218,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17841205 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05094824 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 4218, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4218)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    The discovery and retrieval of video games in library and information systems is, by and large, dependent on a limited set of descriptive metadata. Noticeably missing from this metadata are classifications of visual style-despite the overwhelmingly visual nature of most video games and the interest in visual style among video game users. One explanation for this paucity is the difficulty in eliciting consistent judgements about visual style, likely due to subjective interpretations of terminology and a lack of demonstrable testing for coinciding judgements. This study presents a taxonomy of video game visual styles constructed from the findings of a 22-participant cataloging user study of visual styles. A detailed description of the study, and its value and shortcomings, are presented along with reflections about the challenges of cultivating consensus about visual style in video games. The high degree of overall agreement in the user study demonstrates the potential value of a descriptor like visual style and the use of a cataloging study in developing visual style taxonomies. The resulting visual style taxonomy, the methods and analysis described herein may help improve the organization and retrieval of video games and possibly other visual materials like graphic designs, illustrations, and animations.
  16. Roy, W.; Gray, C.: Preparing existing metadata for repository batch import : a recipe for a fickle food (2018) 0.01
    0.008628479 = product of:
      0.017256958 = sum of:
        0.017256958 = product of:
          0.034513917 = sum of:
            0.034513917 = weight(_text_:22 in 4550) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.034513917 = score(doc=4550,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17841205 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05094824 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 4550, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4550)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    10.11.2018 16:27:22
  17. Willis, C.; Greenberg, J.; White, H.: Analysis and synthesis of metadata goals for scientific data (2012) 0.01
    0.006902783 = product of:
      0.013805566 = sum of:
        0.013805566 = product of:
          0.027611133 = sum of:
            0.027611133 = weight(_text_:22 in 367) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.027611133 = score(doc=367,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17841205 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05094824 = queryNorm
                0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 367, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=367)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    The proliferation of discipline-specific metadata schemes contributes to artificial barriers that can impede interdisciplinary and transdisciplinary research. The authors considered this problem by examining the domains, objectives, and architectures of nine metadata schemes used to document scientific data in the physical, life, and social sciences. They used a mixed-methods content analysis and Greenberg's () metadata objectives, principles, domains, and architectural layout (MODAL) framework, and derived 22 metadata-related goals from textual content describing each metadata scheme. Relationships are identified between the domains (e.g., scientific discipline and type of data) and the categories of scheme objectives. For each strong correlation (>0.6), a Fisher's exact test for nonparametric data was used to determine significance (p < .05). Significant relationships were found between the domains and objectives of the schemes. Schemes describing observational data are more likely to have "scheme harmonization" (compatibility and interoperability with related schemes) as an objective; schemes with the objective "abstraction" (a conceptual model exists separate from the technical implementation) also have the objective "sufficiency" (the scheme defines a minimal amount of information to meet the needs of the community); and schemes with the objective "data publication" do not have the objective "element refinement." The analysis indicates that many metadata-driven goals expressed by communities are independent of scientific discipline or the type of data, although they are constrained by historical community practices and workflows as well as the technological environment at the time of scheme creation. The analysis reveals 11 fundamental metadata goals for metadata documenting scientific data in support of sharing research data across disciplines and domains. The authors report these results and highlight the need for more metadata-related research, particularly in the context of recent funding agency policy changes.