Search (18 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × theme_ss:"Geschichte der Kataloge"
  1. Eversberg, B.: ADV und Zetteldruck : ein Widerspruch? (1975) 0.04 
    0.0396217 = product of:
  0.0792434 = sum of:
    0.058523346 = weight(_text_:data in 4431) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.058523346 = score(doc=4431,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.120893985 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03823278 = queryNorm
        0.48408815 = fieldWeight in 4431, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4431)
    0.020720055 = product of:
      0.04144011 = sum of:
        0.04144011 = weight(_text_:22 in 4431) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04144011 = score(doc=4431,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13388468 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03823278 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4431, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4431)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Abstract
    A method is outlined which would permit a large number of libraries of all types to use centralised cataloguing facilities without the need for their own automatic data processing equipment and outlay. The method is seen as an alternative to the OCLC on-line data bank, and permits the ordering of printed catalogue cards by machine-readable but hand-prepared data cards, such as the loan cards which readers at the Münster library are at present required to complete. The proposed sequence of ordering is set out in 11 stages
    Source
    Zeitschrift für Bibliothekswesen und Bibliographie. 22(1975) H.5, S.387-390
  2. Panizzi, A.K.C.B.: Passages in my official life (1871) 0.01 
    0.012819881 = product of:
  0.051279522 = sum of:
    0.051279522 = product of:
      0.102559045 = sum of:
        0.102559045 = weight(_text_:22 in 935) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.102559045 = score(doc=935,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.13388468 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03823278 = queryNorm
            0.76602525 = fieldWeight in 935, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=935)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Date
    22. 7.2007 12:05:26
    22. 7.2007 12:08:24
  3. Spicher, K.M.: ¬The development of the MARC format (1996) 0.01 
    0.0128019815 = product of:
  0.051207926 = sum of:
    0.051207926 = weight(_text_:data in 5574) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.051207926 = score(doc=5574,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.120893985 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03823278 = queryNorm
        0.42357713 = fieldWeight in 5574, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5574)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Abstract
    The use of computerized cataloguing data requires a commitment on the part of libraries to the standardization of data elements and record formats. Early computerized formats were initiated by several research libraries to serve the needs of particular university systems. In developing MARC, the LoC drew on the experiences of these libraries in establishing a standard acceptable to the research library community for the interchange of bibliographic data. Discusses early computerized formats influencing MARC, the origins of the MARC Pilot Project, and design factors influencing the evolution of the format through MARC2. Research was based on primary sources documenting the early history of MARC, including unpublished documents in the LoC archives
  4. Creider, L.S.: ¬A comparison of the Paris Principles and the International Cataloguing Principles (2009) 0.01 
    0.008447117 = product of:
  0.03378847 = sum of:
    0.03378847 = weight(_text_:data in 2985) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.03378847 = score(doc=2985,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.120893985 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03823278 = queryNorm
        0.2794884 = fieldWeight in 2985, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2985)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Abstract
    After more than forty-five years of cataloging experience with the Paris Principles and their impact on the international sharing of bibliographic data, the process of replacing them with a wider and deeper set of International Cataloguing Principles is nearing completion. This paper compares the scope, technological context, process of decision-making, conceptual framework, and amount of change involved in the adoption of the two different statements.
  5. Dobreski, B.; Kwasnik, B.: Changing depictions of persons in library practice : spirits, pseudonyms, and human books (2017) 0.01 
    0.0074662673 = product of:
  0.02986507 = sum of:
    0.02986507 = weight(_text_:data in 4140) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.02986507 = score(doc=4140,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.120893985 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03823278 = queryNorm
        0.24703519 = fieldWeight in 4140, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4140)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Abstract
    Among knowledge organizing institutions, libraries have a rich history of depicting persons as information. From personal authority records to descriptions of oral history interviews, libraries have amassed data on persons from a variety of perspectives. Within this set of traditions, however, subtle but significant shifts in practice and conception have occurred, particularly concerning how persons are interpreted and depicted and how such depictions are justified. To explore these issues, we looked to four specific library traditions: authority work, community information, oral history, and "human library" events. Within these traditions, we identified six standards guiding the representation of persons. We performed a content analysis of these standards, along with a semantic alignment and comparison of descriptive elements. From this analysis, we reconstructed an historical timeline and a set of narratives capturing changing definitions of people, a shifting focus from names to identities, and an increasing acceptance of varied sources of justification. Findings show not only a number of critical variations within library practices but also practical and ethical issues concerning the responsibility of libraries as well as the redistribution and reuse of library data on the web.
  6. Eversberg, B.: Zur Katalogpolitik der alten Hochschulbibliotheken : Regeln für die alphabetische Katalogisierung (1978) 0.01 
    0.0073912274 = product of:
  0.02956491 = sum of:
    0.02956491 = weight(_text_:data in 368) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.02956491 = score(doc=368,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.120893985 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03823278 = queryNorm
        0.24455236 = fieldWeight in 368, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=368)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Abstract
    After a long delay the final edition of RAK has been published. The old university libraries have suffered for years from using the Prussian Instructions which are obsolete and time-consuming; they have hesitated to give their old catalogues up but should do so as soon as possible. A new cataloguing policy is now needed, moving away from traditional practices that still govern even RAK towards simplified rules suitable for future developments such as use in centralised regional catalogues and in automated data processing. Simplified rules are proposed and discussed in relation to American and British minimal cataloguing, with suggestions for changes in basic terminology, general rules, main and subordinate entries, personal name and corporate body entries and subject headings
  7. Mulsow, M.: Jede, Autor seine Maske : Die Bibliothek als Theater: Vincentius Placcius erfindet 1708 das Karteikastensystem (2002) 0.01 
    0.0073333154 = product of:
  0.029333262 = sum of:
    0.029333262 = product of:
      0.058666524 = sum of:
        0.058666524 = weight(_text_:lexikon in 523) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.058666524 = score(doc=523,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.23962554 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.2675414 = idf(docFreq=227, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03823278 = queryNorm
            0.24482584 = fieldWeight in 523, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              6.2675414 = idf(docFreq=227, maxDocs=44218)
              0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=523)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Content
    ""Larvatus prodeo": Mit diesen Worten erklärt Descartes 1619 gegenüber Beeckmann, er wolle seinen Untersuchungen nur versteckt und hinter einer Maske nachgehen. Simulation und Dissimulation waren in dieser Zeit fast unabdingbare Tugenden für denjenigen, der innovativ und jenseits der gängigen Pfade forschen und veröffentlichen wollte. Um so mehr, wurde es allerdings im Verlauf des siebzehnten Jahrhunderts zu einer Dringlichkeit für die "Historia litteraria", für die Orientierung in den Wissensbeständen also, den Autoren ihre Larven abzunehmen: zumindest post festum, nach dem Abflauen der jeweiligen stürmischen Kontroversen, die ihre Schriften ausgelöst hatten. Man empfand die Masse der nicht zuschreibbaren Titel als ein "Chaos", einen "Orcus", der zu bändigen sei. Diesem Bedarf kam schließlich 1708 der Hamburger Vincentius Placcius nach, mit dem ersten umfassenden Lexikon in dieser Sache, dem monumentalen "Theatrum anonymorum et pseudonymorum". Placcius ist auch der erste gewesen, der die Technik des Karteikastenschrankes publik gemacht hat; er kannte sich also aus mit der Bändigung von Wissen. Helmut Zedelmaier hat jüngst an Placcius erinnert, der als Schüler des Naturwissenschaftlers Joachim Jungius eine "Ars Excerpendi" geschrieben und darin die Entwürfe seines Lehrers veröffentlicht hat (Helmut Zedelmaier, "De ratione excerpendi: Daniel Georg Morhof und das Exzerpieren", in Francoise Waquet, Hrsg., Mapping the World of Learning: The "Polyhistor" of Daniel Georg Morhof, Wiesbaden 2000). Nach Zedelmaier war das Besondere an der von Jungius und Placcius verwendeten Methode, daß sie provisorisch war. Nicht mehr in Bücher mit festgefügten thematischen "Loci" schrieb man jetzt, sondern auf Zettel, die mit einer Halteklammer an metallene Registerkarten geheftet wurden. So konnten die Zettel nach Belieben umsortiert werden, wenn sich neue Bezüge für sie ergaben. Ein solches provisorisches Ordnen mag auch beim Aufspüren von larvierten Autoren geholfen haben. Der gelehrte Detektiv, der sich an ihre Fersen heftete, hatte immer neue Indizien zu kombinieren, bis sich das Rätsel um die Identität des Verfassers lüftete. Was heute die Recherche im Internet leistet, war damals noch Handarbeit. Anonymen- und Pseudonymenkataloge anzulegen ist im späten siebzehnten und frühen achtzehnten Jahrhundert fast zum Modephänomen unter wohlhabenden Gelehrtenavanciert. Wohlhabend: weil zu dieser Tätigkeit eine große Privatbibliothek gehörte, die sich nur mit beträchtlichen finanziellen Mitteln aufbauen ließ, zumal wenn sie seltene Texte oder gar Manuskripte enthalten sollte. Placcius' Buch ist ein Titelkupfer vorangestellt, auf dem ein Gelehrter in seiner detektivischen Tätigkeit mehreren Autoren die Masken vom Gesicht nimmt, so daß ihr wahres Antlitz sichtbar wird. Über der Szenerie hängen bereits eine ganze Reihe von Masken, die von erbrachten Sherlock-Holmes-Leistungen zeugen. Das "Theater", in dem sich diese Demaskierung vollzieht, ist natürlich die Gelehrtenbibliothek, und zwar eine Bibliothek hinter jener Bühne, auf der die larvierten Autoren aufgetreten sind. Im Hintergrund sind ein Merkur und eine Minerva sichtbar, Zeichen der Verbindung von Rhetorik und Vernunft in den Artes, und im tiefsten Hintergrund scheint die ephesinische Artemis auf, die Göttin der Natur, als letzter Referenzpunkt aller Künste. "Jedem das Seine" (suum cuique) steht als Motto über der Darstellung.
    Damit ist offenbar gemeint, daß jeder Autor sein wahres Gesicht zurückerhält, daß nicht mehr die fremde, sondern die eigene Autorität und Person gefragt ist. Präziser ist auf Cicero angespielt, der in "De officiis" von den Rollen spricht, die zu verkörpern uns die Natur aufgegeben habe, und die Regel ausgibt: Bleibe bei dem, was dir eigentümlich ist, nimm nicht andere Charaktere an, sondern sei unverstellt du selbst. Bei dem "suum cuique" ist deshalb "persona" zu ergänzen, so wie auf einer florentinischen Tafel aus dem sechzehnten Jahrhundert: "sua cuique persona". Placcius' Lexikon schafft demnach die von den Autoren künstlich hergestellte Differenz zu sich selbst aus der Welt und bringt Autor und Person wieder zur Deckung. Damit ist freilich ein gesellschaftliches, ja wissenssoziologisches Problem - das der Dissimulation - auf eine einfache moralische Devise zur Authentizität reduziert. Man ist deshalb versucht - um der Reduktion entgegenzusteuern -, das Bild und das Motto andersherum zu lesen, sicherlich gegen die intendierte Verlaufsrichtung des Stechers. Der Gelehrte im Vordergrund erscheint dann als jemand, der Masken verteilt, "personae" vergibt, und zwar "jedem die seine". Diese Blickrichtung wäre diejenige der Autoren selbst, die in der Absicht, sich zu larvieren, eine Wahl treffen müssen, welche "persona" sie annehmen Wollen, durch welche Maske sie zu sprechen gedenken. Der "Ineptus religiosus", ein anonymer Text aus der Mitte des siebzehnten Jahrhunderts, empfiehlt denn auch ganz ohne Scham: "Halte besonders diejenigen für auserlesene Bücher, welche ohne Namen des Verfassers herauskommen und auch keinen Ort des Drucks angeben." Die Leine voll Masken, die über der Bibliothek gespannt ist, bezeichnet dann die pluralisierte Situation der frühen Neuzeit mit ihrer Vielfalt von wählbaren Traditionen, und der Gelehrte ist nun ein - freilich subversiver - Requisiteur, der aus seiner Kenntnis der Wissens- und Traditionsvorräte heraus den Autoren bei der Suche nach der passenden Rolle hilft. Der dissimulierende Autor ist dabei notwendig ein Eklektiker geworden, denn bei einer Pluralisierung von Autoritäten hilft nur die connaisseurhafte Auswahl, wenn man auf der Bühne der Öffentlichkeit, die im Hintergrund sichtbar wird" Erfolg haben will. Es ist dieser Blick aus der Autorenrichtung, aus der Richtung der "invention of traditions", den die Besinnung auf die Vervielfältigung der Pseudonyme in der frühen Neuzeit und die Versuche, ihnen mit Zettelkästen beizukommen, lehrten. Denn jenseits des Polizeiblicks auf die Karteien von Verdächtigen, von Schwindlern und Betrügern gab es tatsächlich in der Frühaufklärung eine literargeschichtliche Beschäftigung mit anonymen Werken. In gleichsam subversiver Verwendung der Gelehrsamkeit ä la Placcius stellte man sich eine "Bibliotheca Vulcani" zusammen, nämlich Notizen über verbotene und verbrannte Bücher. Es waren Schriften, die "dem Vulcan geopfert" worden waren, die gleich Märtyrern den Feuertod erlitten hatten. Diese Zettelsammlung konnte dann als Archiv für neue radikale "Schandtaten" dienen. Sie stiftete zur Intertextualität an: Werke des philosophischen Untergrundes um 1700 tragen oft fiktive Verfasser- oder Druckernamen, die den Text in die Tradition etwa von Spinoza, der politischen Widerstandsliteratur oder dem Renaissancenaturalismus stellen. Je nach Wahl der Maske, die man auf der langen Leine des Zettelkastens zur Ansicht hatte."
  8. Blake, V.L.P.: Forging the Anglo-American Cataloging Alliance : descriptive cataloging, 1830-1908 (2003) 0.01 
    0.0064750174 = product of:
  0.02590007 = sum of:
    0.02590007 = product of:
      0.05180014 = sum of:
        0.05180014 = weight(_text_:22 in 4056) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05180014 = score(doc=4056,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13388468 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03823278 = queryNorm
            0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 4056, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4056)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Pages
    S.3-22
  9. Steinhagen, E.N.: Historical perspective of a union catalog in Chile : authorities and periodicals (2003) 0.01 
    0.0064750174 = product of:
  0.02590007 = sum of:
    0.02590007 = product of:
      0.05180014 = sum of:
        0.05180014 = weight(_text_:22 in 4064) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05180014 = score(doc=4064,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13388468 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03823278 = queryNorm
            0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 4064, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4064)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Date
    29. 7.2006 20:06:22
  10. Buizza, P.: Bibliographic control and authority control from Paris principles to the present (2004) 0.01 
    0.0063353376 = product of:
  0.02534135 = sum of:
    0.02534135 = weight(_text_:data in 5667) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.02534135 = score(doc=5667,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.120893985 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03823278 = queryNorm
        0.2096163 = fieldWeight in 5667, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5667)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Abstract
    Forty years ago the ICCP in Paris laid the foundations of international co-operation in descriptive cataloging without explicitly speaking of authority control. Some of the factors in the evolution of authority control are the development of catalogs (from card catalog to local automation, to today's OPAC on the Web) and services provided by libraries (from individual service to local users to system networks, to the World Wide Web), as well as international agreements on cataloging (from Paris Principles to the UBC programme, to the report on Mandatory data elements for internationally shared resource authority records). This evolution progressed from the principle of uniform heading to the definition of authority entries and records, and from the responsibility of national bibliographic agencies for the form of the names of their own authors to be shared internationally to the concept of authorized equivalent heading. Some issues of the present state are the persisting differences among national rules and the aim of respecting both local culture and language and international readability.
  11. Zerbst, H.-J.; Kaptein, O.: Gegenwärtiger Stand und Entwicklungstendenzen der Sacherschließung : Auswertung einer Umfrage an deutschen wissenschaftlichen und Öffentlichen Bibliotheken (1993) 0.01 
    0.006072379 = product of:
  0.024289517 = sum of:
    0.024289517 = product of:
      0.121447586 = sum of:
        0.121447586 = weight(_text_:3a in 7394) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.121447586 = score(doc=7394,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.32413796 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03823278 = queryNorm
            0.3746787 = fieldWeight in 7394, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=7394)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Abstract
    Ergebnis einer Umfrage aus dem Frühjahr 1993. A. Wissenschaftliche Bibliotheken: Versandt wurde der Fragebogen an die Mitglieder der Sektion IV des DBV. Fragen: (1a) Um welchen Bestand handelt es sich, der sachlich erschlossen wird? (1b) Wie groß ist dieser Bestand? (1c) Wird dieser Bestand vollständig oder nur in Auswahl (einzelne Fächer, Lehrbücher, Dissertationen o.ä.) sachlich erschlossen? (1d) Seit wann bestehen die jetzigen Sachkataloge? (2) Auf welche Art wird der Bestand zur Zeit sachlich erschlossen? (3a) Welche Klassifikation wird angewendet? (3b) Gibt es alphabetisches SyK-Register bzw. einen Zugriff auf die Klassenbeschreibungen? (3c) Gibt es ergänzende Schlüssel für die Aspekte Ort, Zeit, Form? (4) Falls Sie einen SWK führen (a) nach welchem Regelwerk? (b) Gibt es ein genormtes Vokabular oder einen Thesaurus (ggf. nur für bestimmte Fächer)? (5) In welcher Form existieren die Sachkataloge? (6) Ist die Bibliothek an einer kooperativen Sacherschließung, z.B. in einem Verbund beteiligt? [Nein: 79%] (7) Nutzen Sie Fremdleistungen bei der Sacherschließung? [Ja: 46%] (8) Welche sachlichen Suchmöglichkeiten gibt es für Benutzer? (9) Sind zukünftige Veränderungen bei der Sacherschließung geplant? [Ja: 73%]. - B. Öffentliche Bibliotheken: Die Umfrage richtete sich an alle ÖBs der Sektionen I, II und III des DBV. Fragen: (1) Welche Sachkataloge führen Sie? (2) Welche Klassifikationen (Systematiken) liegen dem SyK zugrunde? [ASB: 242; KAB: 333; SfB: 4 (???); SSD: 11; Berliner: 18] (3) Führen Sie ein eigenes Schlagwort-Register zum SyK bzw. zur Klassifikation (Systematik)? (4) Führen Sie den SWK nach ...? [RSWK: 132 (= ca. 60%) anderen Regeln: 93] (5) Seit wann bestehen die jetzigen Sachkataloge? (6) In welcher Form existiern die Sachkataloge? (7) In welchem Umfang wird der Bestand erschlossen? (8) Welche Signaturen verwenden Sie? (9) Ist die Bibliothek an einer kooperativen Sacherschließung, z.B. einem Verbund, beteiligt? [Nein: 96%] (10) Nutzen Sie Fremdleistungen bei der Sacherschließung? [Ja: 70%] (11) Woher beziehen Sie diese Fremdleistungen? (12) Verfügen Sie über ein Online-Katalogsystem mit OPAC? [Ja: 78; Nein: 614] (13) Sind zukünftig Veränderungen bei der Sacherschließung geplant? [Nein: 458; Ja: 237]; RESÜMEE für ÖB: "(i) Einführung von EDV-Katalogen bleibt auch in den 90er Jahren ein Thema, (ii) Der Aufbau von SWK wird in vielen Bibliotheken in Angriff genommen, dabei spielt die Fremddatenübernahme eine entscheidende Rolle, (iii) RSWK werden zunehmend angewandt, Nutzung der SWD auch für andere Regeln wirkt normierend, (iv) Große Bewegung auf dem 'Systematik-Markt' ist in absehbarer Zeit nicht zu erwarten, (v) Für kleinere Bibliotheken wird der Zettelkatalog auf absehbare Zeit noch die herrschende Katalogform sein, (vi) Der erhebliche Nachholbedarf in den neuen Bundesländern wird nur in einem größeren Zeitraum zu leisten sein. ??? SPEZIALBIBIOTHEKEN ???
  12. Krajewski, M.: Paper machines : about cards & catalogs, 1548-1929 (2011) 0.01 
    0.0052794483 = product of:
  0.021117793 = sum of:
    0.021117793 = weight(_text_:data in 735) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.021117793 = score(doc=735,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.120893985 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03823278 = queryNorm
        0.17468026 = fieldWeight in 735, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=735)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Abstract
    "Krajewski draws on recent German media theory and on a rich array of European and American sources in this thought-provoking account of the index card as a tool of information management. In investigating the road from the slips of paper of the 16th century to the data processing of the 20th, Krajewski highlights its twists and turns--failures and unintended consequences, reinventions, and surprising transfers."--Ann M. Blair, Henry Charles Lea Professor of History, Harvard University, and author of Too Much to Know: Managing Scholarly Information before the Modern Age -- Ann Blair "This is a fascinating, original, continuously surprising, and meticulously researched study of the long history of the emergence of card systems for organizing not only libraries but business activities in Europe and the United States. It is particularly important for English language readers due to its European perspective and the extraordinary range of German and other resources on which it draws." --W. Boyd Rayward, Professor Emeritus, Graduate School of Library and Information Science, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign -- W. Boyd Rayward "Markus Krajewski has done the history of cataloguing and the history of information management a considerable service: I recommend it highly." -- Professor Tom Wilson, Editor-in-Chief, Information Research
  13. Blake, V.L.P.: Forging the Anglo-American cataloging alliance : descriptive cataloging, 1830-1908 (2002) 0.00 
    0.0045325123 = product of:
  0.01813005 = sum of:
    0.01813005 = product of:
      0.0362601 = sum of:
        0.0362601 = weight(_text_:22 in 5479) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0362601 = score(doc=5479,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13388468 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03823278 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 5479, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5479)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 35(2002) nos.1/2, S.3-22
  14. Understanding FRBR : what it is and how it will affect our retrieval tools (2007) 0.00 
    0.0044797603 = product of:
  0.017919041 = sum of:
    0.017919041 = weight(_text_:data in 1675) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.017919041 = score(doc=1675,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.120893985 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03823278 = queryNorm
        0.14822112 = fieldWeight in 1675, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=1675)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Content
    1. An Introduction to Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records (FRBR) - Arlene G. Taylor (1-20) 2. An Introduction to Functional Requirements for Authority Data (FRAD) - Glenn E. Patton (21-28) 3. Understanding the Relationship between FRBR and FRAD - Glenn E. Patton (29-34) 4. FRBR and the History of Cataloging - William Denton (35-58) 5. The Impact of Research on the Development of FRBR - Edward T. O'Neill (59-72) 6. Bibliographic Families and Superworks - Richard P. Smiraglia (73-86) 7. FRBR and RDA (Resource Description and Access) - Barbara B. Tillett (87-96) 8. FRBR and Archival Materials - Alexander C. Thurman (97-102) 9. FRBR and Works of Art, Architecture, and Material Culture - Murtha Baca and Sherman Clarke (103-110) 10. FRBR and Cartographic Materials - Mary Lynette Larsgaard (111-116) 11. FRBR and Moving Image Materials - Martha M. Yee (117-130) 12. FRBR and Music - Sherry L. Vellucci (131-152) 13. FRBR and Serials - Steven C. Shadle (153-174)
    Footnote
    Resonanz: "Arlene Taylor and her compadres don't even try to teach you how to construct a hierarchical record. Instead, they direct their efforts toward showcasing what's possible when digital technology and traditional cataloging practice meet. This is the future of cataloging." - Library Media Connection "The emergence of this textbook is testimony to the breadth and depth of work done to date. It documents much of that work, and provides a good basic introduction to FRBR that is broadly understandable... The relational concepts within FRBR are complicated and can be challenging. This book does a good job of illuminating them in a straightforward manner. It also describes how the application of the FRBR concepts could improve our systems of bibliographic access in very specific ways... For those of us that really want or need to be able to predict the impact that FRBR will have on our work, this is an accessible explanation of the current state of the art. As such it is a real contribution to our understanding." - TechKNOW "Understanding FRBR... features chapters contributed by leading authorities in the cataloging field... It offers a basic introduction to FRBR, discussions about FRBR, FRAD (functional requirements for authority data), and RDA (resource description and access), and the issues involved in using FRBR in nontraditional library settings such as with cartographic materials and music. Both books are well illustrated and include numerous bibliographical resources.' [Reviewed in conjuntion with FRBR: A Guide for the Perplexed]." - Library Journal "Taylor and her contributors cover FRBR and introduce the reader to FRAD as well... All chapters conclude with current and useful references to further reading and more information." - Booklist "Understanding FRBR is clearly written, well illustrated (many of the concepts are clarified by very helpful diagrams), and well indexed; additionally, chapters feature extensive bibliographies, many of which provide URLs to the IFLA groups' documents. While it may seem that this book is of interest only to catalogers, the application of FRBR will change the structure of catalog and the systems used to store and display it; therefore, it is an important text for systems librarians, reference librarians, and anybody else interested in the future of the organization and display of bibliographic information." - College & Research Libraries "Understanding FRBR is a useful and timely book that brings together recent developments in FRBR and offers several assessments of it." - Technicalities "No cataloguer, bibliographic systems designer or library and information science lecturers and students should be without this book. It is a useful resource in acquiring an understanding of what FRBR is about and how it will change the way in which cataloguers will think about cataloguing in future." - The Electronic Library
  15. Dousa, T.M.: E. Wyndham Hulme's classification of the attributes of books : On an early model of a core bibliographical entity (2017) 0.00 
    0.0042235586 = product of:
  0.016894234 = sum of:
    0.016894234 = weight(_text_:data in 3859) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.016894234 = score(doc=3859,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.120893985 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03823278 = queryNorm
        0.1397442 = fieldWeight in 3859, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3859)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Abstract
    Modelling bibliographical entities is a prominent activity within knowledge organization today. Current models of bibliographic entities, such as Functional Requirements for Bibliographical Records (FRBR) and the Bibliographic Framework (BIBFRAME), take inspiration from data - modelling methods developed by computer scientists from the mid - 1970s on. Thus, it would seem that the modelling of bibliographic entities is an activity of very recent vintage. However, it is possible to find examples of bibliographical models from earlier periods of knowledge organization. The purpose of this paper is to draw attention to one such model, outlined by the early 20th - century British classification theorist E. Wyndham Hulme in his essay on "Principles of Book Classification" (1911 - 1912). There, Hulme set forth a classification of various attributes by which books can conceivably be classified. These he first divided into accidental and inseparable attributes. Accidental attributes were subdivided into edition - level and copy - level attributes and inseparable attitudes, into physical and non - physical attributes. Comparison of Hulme's classification of attributes with those of FRBR and BIBFRAME 2.0 reveals that the different classes of attributes in Hulme's classification correspond to groups of attributes associated with different bibliographical entities in those models. These later models assume the existence of different bibliographic entities in an abstraction hierarchy among which attributes are distributed, whereas Hulme posited only a single entity - the book - , whose various aspects he clustered into different classes of attributes. Thus, Hulme's model offers an interesting alternative to current assumptions about how to conceptualize the relationship between attributes and entities in the bibliographical universe.
  16. Dousa, T.M.: E. Wyndham Hulme's classification of the attributes of books : on an early model of a core bibliographical entity (2017) 0.00 
    0.0042235586 = product of:
  0.016894234 = sum of:
    0.016894234 = weight(_text_:data in 4141) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.016894234 = score(doc=4141,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.120893985 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03823278 = queryNorm
        0.1397442 = fieldWeight in 4141, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4141)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Abstract
    Modelling bibliographical entities is a prominent activity within knowledge organization today. Current models of bibliographic entities, such as Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records (FRBR) and the Bibliographic Framework (BIBFRAME), take inspiration from data-modelling methods developed by computer scientists from the mid-1970s on. Thus, it would seem that the modelling of bibliographic entities is an activity of very recent vintage. However, it is possible to find examples of bibliographical models from earlier periods of knowledge organization. The purpose of this paper is to draw attention to one such model, outlined by the early twentiethcentury British classification theorist E. Wyndham Hulme in his essay on "Principles of Book Classification" (1911-1912). There, Hulme set forth a classification of various attributes by which books can be classified. These he first divided into "accidental" and "inseparable" attributes. Accidental attributes were subdivided into edition-level and copy-level attributes and inseparable attitudes, into "physical" and "non-physical" attributes. Comparison of Hulme's classification of attributes with those of FRBR and BIBFRAME 2.0 reveals that the different classes of attributes in Hulme's classification correspond to groups of attributes associated with different bibliographical entities in those models. These later models assume the existence of different bibliographic entities in an abstract hierarchy among which attributes are distributed, whereas Hulme posited only a single entity-the book-whose various aspects he clustered into different classes of attributes. Thus, Hulme's model offers an interesting alternative to current assumptions about how to conceptualize the relationship between attributes and entities in the bibliographical universe.
  17. Pettee, J.: ¬The subject approach to books and the development of the dictionary catalog (1985) 0.00 
    0.002590007 = product of:
  0.010360028 = sum of:
    0.010360028 = product of:
      0.020720055 = sum of:
        0.020720055 = weight(_text_:22 in 3624) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.020720055 = score(doc=3624,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13388468 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03823278 = queryNorm
            0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 3624, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3624)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Footnote
    Original in: Pettee, J.: The history and theory of the alphabetical subject approach to books. New York: Wilson 1946. S.22-25.
  18. Laaff, M.: Googles genialer Urahn (2011) 0.00 
    0.0016187544 = product of:
  0.0064750174 = sum of:
    0.0064750174 = product of:
      0.012950035 = sum of:
        0.012950035 = weight(_text_:22 in 4610) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.012950035 = score(doc=4610,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13388468 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03823278 = queryNorm
            0.09672529 = fieldWeight in 4610, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=4610)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Date
    24.10.2008 14:19:22

Authors

Years

Languages

  • e 12
  • d 6

Types

Themes

Subjects

Classifications