-
Ross, J.: ¬The impact of technology on indexing (2000)
0.03
0.027827624 = product of:
0.05565525 = sum of:
0.05565525 = product of:
0.1113105 = sum of:
0.1113105 = weight(_text_:22 in 263) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.1113105 = score(doc=263,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17981094 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051347714 = queryNorm
0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 263, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=263)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Indexer. 22(2000) no.1, S.25-26
-
Walker, A.: Indexing commonplace books : John Locke's method (2001)
0.03
0.027827624 = product of:
0.05565525 = sum of:
0.05565525 = product of:
0.1113105 = sum of:
0.1113105 = weight(_text_:22 in 13) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.1113105 = score(doc=13,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17981094 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051347714 = queryNorm
0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 13, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=13)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Indexer. 22(2001) no.3, S.14-18
-
Crystal, D.: Quote index unquote (2000)
0.03
0.027827624 = product of:
0.05565525 = sum of:
0.05565525 = product of:
0.1113105 = sum of:
0.1113105 = weight(_text_:22 in 487) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.1113105 = score(doc=487,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17981094 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051347714 = queryNorm
0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 487, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=487)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Indexer. 22(2000) no.1, S.14-20
-
Matthews, D.: Indexing published letters (2001)
0.03
0.027827624 = product of:
0.05565525 = sum of:
0.05565525 = product of:
0.1113105 = sum of:
0.1113105 = weight(_text_:22 in 4160) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.1113105 = score(doc=4160,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17981094 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051347714 = queryNorm
0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 4160, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4160)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Indexer. 22(2001) no.3, S.135-141
-
Gratch, B.; Settel, B.; Atherton, P.: Characteristics of book indexes for subject retrieval in the humanities and social sciences (1978)
0.02
0.024349172 = product of:
0.048698343 = sum of:
0.048698343 = product of:
0.09739669 = sum of:
0.09739669 = weight(_text_:22 in 1061) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09739669 = score(doc=1061,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17981094 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051347714 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 1061, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1061)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Indexer. 11(1978), S.14-22
-
Davis, M.: Building a global legal index : a work in progress (2001)
0.02
0.024349172 = product of:
0.048698343 = sum of:
0.048698343 = product of:
0.09739669 = sum of:
0.09739669 = weight(_text_:22 in 6443) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09739669 = score(doc=6443,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17981094 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051347714 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 6443, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6443)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Indexer. 22(2001) no.3, S.123-127
-
Browne, G.: ¬The definite article : acknowledging The in index entries (2001)
0.02
0.024349172 = product of:
0.048698343 = sum of:
0.048698343 = product of:
0.09739669 = sum of:
0.09739669 = weight(_text_:22 in 12) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09739669 = score(doc=12,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17981094 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051347714 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 12, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=12)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Indexer. 22(2001) no.3, S.119-122
-
Weinberg, B.H.: Book indexes in France : medieval specimens and modern practices (2000)
0.02
0.024349172 = product of:
0.048698343 = sum of:
0.048698343 = product of:
0.09739669 = sum of:
0.09739669 = weight(_text_:22 in 486) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09739669 = score(doc=486,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17981094 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051347714 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 486, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=486)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Indexer. 22(2000) no.1, S.2-13
-
Mauer, P.: Embedded indexing : pros and cons for the indexer (2000)
0.02
0.024349172 = product of:
0.048698343 = sum of:
0.048698343 = product of:
0.09739669 = sum of:
0.09739669 = weight(_text_:22 in 488) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09739669 = score(doc=488,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17981094 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051347714 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 488, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=488)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Indexer. 22(2000) no.1, S.27-28
-
Anderson, C.R.: Indexing with a computer : past and present (2000)
0.02
0.024349172 = product of:
0.048698343 = sum of:
0.048698343 = product of:
0.09739669 = sum of:
0.09739669 = weight(_text_:22 in 489) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09739669 = score(doc=489,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17981094 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051347714 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 489, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=489)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Indexer. 22(2000) no.1, S.23-24
-
Lee, D.: Judging indexes : the criteria for a good index (2001)
0.02
0.024349172 = product of:
0.048698343 = sum of:
0.048698343 = product of:
0.09739669 = sum of:
0.09739669 = weight(_text_:22 in 4162) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09739669 = score(doc=4162,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17981094 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051347714 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 4162, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4162)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Indexer. 22(2001) no.4, S.191-194
-
Weinberg, B.H.: Predecessors of scientific indexing structures in the domain of religion (2001)
0.02
0.024349172 = product of:
0.048698343 = sum of:
0.048698343 = product of:
0.09739669 = sum of:
0.09739669 = weight(_text_:22 in 4172) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09739669 = score(doc=4172,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17981094 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051347714 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 4172, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4172)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Indexer. 22(2001) no.4, S.178-180
-
Weinberg, B.H.: Index structures in early Hebrew Biblical word lists : preludes to the first Latin concordances (2004)
0.02
0.024349172 = product of:
0.048698343 = sum of:
0.048698343 = product of:
0.09739669 = sum of:
0.09739669 = weight(_text_:22 in 4180) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09739669 = score(doc=4180,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17981094 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051347714 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 4180, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4180)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 17.10.2005 13:54:22
-
Beyond book indexing : how to get started in Web indexing, embedded indexing and other computer-based media (2000)
0.02
0.02156631 = product of:
0.04313262 = sum of:
0.04313262 = product of:
0.08626524 = sum of:
0.08626524 = weight(_text_:multimedia in 215) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08626524 = score(doc=215,freq=4.0), product of:
0.2381132 = queryWeight, product of:
4.6372695 = idf(docFreq=1163, maxDocs=44218)
0.051347714 = queryNorm
0.3622867 = fieldWeight in 215, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
4.6372695 = idf(docFreq=1163, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=215)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Are you curious about new indexing technologies? Would you like to develop and create innovative indexes that provide access to online resources, multimedia, or online help? Do you want to learn new skills and expand your marketing possibilities? This book provides an in-depth look at current and emerging computer-based technologies and offers suggestions for obtaining work in these fields. Extensive refrences and a glossary round out this informative and exciting new book
- Content
- Enthält die Beiträge: Part 1: Beyond stand-alone indexes: embedded indexing: WRIGHT; J.C.: The world of embedded indexing; MONCRIEF, L.: Indexing computer-related documents - Part 2: Beyond the book: Web indexing: WALKER, D.: Subject-oriented Web indexing; BROCCOLI, K. u. G.V. RAVENSWAAY: Web indexing - anchors away; MAISLIN, S.: Ripping out the pages; ROWLAND, M.J.: Plunging in: Creating a Web site index for an online newsletter - Part 3: Special topics in computer-based indexing: ROWLAND, M.J.: <Meta> tags; WOODS. X.B.: Envisioning the word: Multimedia CD-ROM indexing; HOLBERT, S.: How to index Windows-based online help - Part 4: Beyond traditional marketing - selling yourself in hyperspace: ROWLAND, M.J.: Web site design for indexers; RICE, R.: Putting sample indexes on your Web site; CONNOLLY, D.A.: The many uses of Email discussion lists
-
Bell, H.K.: Indexing biographies, and other stories of human lives (1992)
0.02
0.020870717 = product of:
0.041741434 = sum of:
0.041741434 = product of:
0.08348287 = sum of:
0.08348287 = weight(_text_:22 in 5396) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08348287 = score(doc=5396,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17981094 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051347714 = queryNorm
0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 5396, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5396)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Footnote
- Rez. in: Knowledge organization 22(1995) no.1, S.46-47 (R. Fugmann)
-
Lathrop, L.: ¬An indexer's guide to the Internet (1999)
0.02
0.020870717 = product of:
0.041741434 = sum of:
0.041741434 = product of:
0.08348287 = sum of:
0.08348287 = weight(_text_:22 in 485) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08348287 = score(doc=485,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17981094 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051347714 = queryNorm
0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 485, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=485)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Footnote
- Rez. in: Indexer 22(2000) no.1, S.51 (R. Davis)
-
Weinberg, B.H.: ¬The body of a reference work in relation to its index : an analysis of wordsmanship (1996)
0.02
0.019677103 = product of:
0.039354205 = sum of:
0.039354205 = product of:
0.07870841 = sum of:
0.07870841 = weight(_text_:22 in 6940) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07870841 = score(doc=6940,freq=4.0), product of:
0.17981094 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051347714 = queryNorm
0.4377287 = fieldWeight in 6940, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6940)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 8. 3.1997 20:22:25
- Source
- Indexer. 20(1996) no.1, S.18-22
-
Olason, S.C.: Let's get usable! : Usability studies for indexes (2000)
0.02
0.019677103 = product of:
0.039354205 = sum of:
0.039354205 = product of:
0.07870841 = sum of:
0.07870841 = weight(_text_:22 in 882) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07870841 = score(doc=882,freq=4.0), product of:
0.17981094 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051347714 = queryNorm
0.4377287 = fieldWeight in 882, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=882)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Footnote
- Vgl.: http://www.theindexer.org/files/22-2-olason.pdf.
- Source
- Indexer. 22(2000) no.2, S.91-95
-
Bell, H.K.: History of societies of indexing : part VII: 1992-95 (2000)
0.02
0.017392267 = product of:
0.034784533 = sum of:
0.034784533 = product of:
0.069569066 = sum of:
0.069569066 = weight(_text_:22 in 113) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.069569066 = score(doc=113,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17981094 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051347714 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 113, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=113)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Indexer. 22(2000) no.2, S.81-83
-
Woods, X.B.: Envisioning the word : Multimedia CD-ROM indexing (2000)
0.02
0.017253047 = product of:
0.034506094 = sum of:
0.034506094 = product of:
0.06901219 = sum of:
0.06901219 = weight(_text_:multimedia in 223) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06901219 = score(doc=223,freq=4.0), product of:
0.2381132 = queryWeight, product of:
4.6372695 = idf(docFreq=1163, maxDocs=44218)
0.051347714 = queryNorm
0.28982934 = fieldWeight in 223, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
4.6372695 = idf(docFreq=1163, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=223)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- If you are an indexer who is accustomed to working in solitude with static words, you might face some big surprises in the production of a multimedia CD-ROM. You will not be working alone. You will not be working from a manuscript. Your dexterity with a dedicated software tool for indexing will be irrelevant. The coding or tagging might not be your worry either, because it will likely be done by members of a separate technical staff. The CD-ROM can currently hold 660 megabytes of data. Its production is a massive team effort. Because of the sheer volume of data involved, it is unlikely that one indexer working alone can handle the job in a reasonable period of time. The database for the actual index entries is likely to have been designed specifically for the project at hand, so the indexers will learn the software tools on the job. The entire project will probably be onscreen. So, if you choose to thrust yourself into this teeming amalgam of production, what are the prerequisites and what new things can you expect to learn? CD-ROM is an amorphous new medium with few rules. Your most important resume items might be your flexibility, imagination, and love of words. What remains unchanged from traditional back-of-the-book indexing is the need for empathy with the user; you will still need to come up with exactly the right word for the situation. What is new here is the situation: you might learn to envision the words that correspond to non-textual media such as graphics, photos, video clips, and musical passages. And because you will be dealing with vast amounts of textual and sensory data, you might find yourself rethinking the nature and purpose of an index as a whole. CD-ROM production can take many forms; three will be discussed here
