-
Mehl, S.: Systematic alternatives in lexicalization : the cases of gerund translation (1996)
0.23
0.22717795 = product of:
0.3407669 = sum of:
0.28691417 = weight(_text_:systematic in 532) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.28691417 = score(doc=532,freq=2.0), product of:
0.28397155 = queryWeight, product of:
5.715473 = idf(docFreq=395, maxDocs=44218)
0.049684696 = queryNorm
1.0103624 = fieldWeight in 532, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.715473 = idf(docFreq=395, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=532)
0.053852726 = product of:
0.10770545 = sum of:
0.10770545 = weight(_text_:22 in 532) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.10770545 = score(doc=532,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17398734 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.049684696 = queryNorm
0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 532, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=532)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Date
- 31. 7.1996 9:22:19
-
Fugmann, R.: Subject analysis and indexing : theoretical foundation and practical advice (1993)
0.13
0.12965536 = product of:
0.19448304 = sum of:
0.12552495 = weight(_text_:systematic in 8756) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.12552495 = score(doc=8756,freq=2.0), product of:
0.28397155 = queryWeight, product of:
5.715473 = idf(docFreq=395, maxDocs=44218)
0.049684696 = queryNorm
0.44203353 = fieldWeight in 8756, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.715473 = idf(docFreq=395, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=8756)
0.06895808 = product of:
0.13791616 = sum of:
0.13791616 = weight(_text_:indexing in 8756) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.13791616 = score(doc=8756,freq=12.0), product of:
0.19018644 = queryWeight, product of:
3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
0.049684696 = queryNorm
0.7251629 = fieldWeight in 8756, product of:
3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
12.0 = termFreq=12.0
3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=8756)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Content
- Enthält folgende Kapitel: Information and information systems; Information system survival power; Theoretical considerations on information storage and retrieval; Indexing (representation of the essence of documents; extractive, assignment, consistent indexing, indexing and abstracting, book indexing, index language vocabulary, syntax, concept analysis, evaluation of indexing quality); Technology of information supply; Glossary of terms used; Systematic and 'basic index'
-
Faraj, N.: Analyse d'une methode d'indexation automatique basée sur une analyse syntaxique de texte (1996)
0.13
0.12597175 = product of:
0.18895762 = sum of:
0.14345708 = weight(_text_:systematic in 685) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.14345708 = score(doc=685,freq=2.0), product of:
0.28397155 = queryWeight, product of:
5.715473 = idf(docFreq=395, maxDocs=44218)
0.049684696 = queryNorm
0.5051812 = fieldWeight in 685, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.715473 = idf(docFreq=395, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=685)
0.045500536 = product of:
0.09100107 = sum of:
0.09100107 = weight(_text_:indexing in 685) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09100107 = score(doc=685,freq=4.0), product of:
0.19018644 = queryWeight, product of:
3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
0.049684696 = queryNorm
0.47848347 = fieldWeight in 685, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=685)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- Evaluates an automatic indexing method based on syntactical text analysis combined with statistical analysis. Tests many combinations for the choice of term categories and weighting methods. The experiment, conducted on a software engineering corpus, shows systematic improvement in the use of syntactic term phrases compared to using only individual words as index terms
- Footnote
- Übers. d. Titels: Analysis of an automatic indexing method based on syntactic analysis of text
-
Nielsen, H.J.: ¬The nature of fiction and its significance for classification and indexing (1997)
0.12
0.12121933 = product of:
0.18182899 = sum of:
0.12552495 = weight(_text_:systematic in 1785) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.12552495 = score(doc=1785,freq=2.0), product of:
0.28397155 = queryWeight, product of:
5.715473 = idf(docFreq=395, maxDocs=44218)
0.049684696 = queryNorm
0.44203353 = fieldWeight in 1785, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.715473 = idf(docFreq=395, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1785)
0.05630404 = product of:
0.11260808 = sum of:
0.11260808 = weight(_text_:indexing in 1785) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.11260808 = score(doc=1785,freq=8.0), product of:
0.19018644 = queryWeight, product of:
3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
0.049684696 = queryNorm
0.5920931 = fieldWeight in 1785, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1785)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- Considers the nature of fiction in relation to classification and indexing systems. Literary theory today is very heterogeneous. In designing an indexing system a single trend of school should not be chosen. Following a systematic extension and development of the 'how' facet of fictional documents is an useful approach. Themes should be a visible aspect in classification and indexing systems. Aspects of literary history, period, literary movement and influence should be noted
-
Bhattacharyya, G.: Information: its definition for its service professionals (1997)
0.12
0.117087215 = product of:
0.17563082 = sum of:
0.14345708 = weight(_text_:systematic in 277) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.14345708 = score(doc=277,freq=2.0), product of:
0.28397155 = queryWeight, product of:
5.715473 = idf(docFreq=395, maxDocs=44218)
0.049684696 = queryNorm
0.5051812 = fieldWeight in 277, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.715473 = idf(docFreq=395, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=277)
0.032173738 = product of:
0.064347476 = sum of:
0.064347476 = weight(_text_:indexing in 277) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.064347476 = score(doc=277,freq=2.0), product of:
0.19018644 = queryWeight, product of:
3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
0.049684696 = queryNorm
0.3383389 = fieldWeight in 277, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=277)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- Analyses the elements which make up the term 'information' so that a systematic strategy for defining 'information' can be arrived at and applied by those professionals engaged in providing information about sources of information, subject classification and indexing, and abstracting. Discusses the processes of communication ('self-communication' and communication with others) and their relationship with knowledge; knowing, remembering and learning; organizations and association; the role of language in communication; information, knowledge and data; and the distinction between the medium of expression and the actual message conveyed
-
Jones, P.A.; Bradbeer, P.V.G.: Discovery of optimal weights in a concept selection system (1996)
0.11
0.113588974 = product of:
0.17038345 = sum of:
0.14345708 = weight(_text_:systematic in 6974) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.14345708 = score(doc=6974,freq=2.0), product of:
0.28397155 = queryWeight, product of:
5.715473 = idf(docFreq=395, maxDocs=44218)
0.049684696 = queryNorm
0.5051812 = fieldWeight in 6974, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.715473 = idf(docFreq=395, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6974)
0.026926363 = product of:
0.053852726 = sum of:
0.053852726 = weight(_text_:22 in 6974) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.053852726 = score(doc=6974,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17398734 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.049684696 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 6974, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6974)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- Describes the application of weighting strategies to model uncertainties and probabilities in automatic abstracting systems, particularly in the concept selection phase. The weights were originally assigned in an ad hoc manner and were then refined by manual analysis of the results. The new method attempts to derive a more systematic methods and performs this using a genetic algorithm
- Source
- Information retrieval: new systems and current research. Proceedings of the 16th Research Colloquium of the British Computer Society Information Retrieval Specialist Group, Drymen, Scotland, 22-23 Mar 94. Ed.: R. Leon
-
Moore, N.: ¬The British national information strategy (1998)
0.11
0.113588974 = product of:
0.17038345 = sum of:
0.14345708 = weight(_text_:systematic in 3036) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.14345708 = score(doc=3036,freq=2.0), product of:
0.28397155 = queryWeight, product of:
5.715473 = idf(docFreq=395, maxDocs=44218)
0.049684696 = queryNorm
0.5051812 = fieldWeight in 3036, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.715473 = idf(docFreq=395, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3036)
0.026926363 = product of:
0.053852726 = sum of:
0.053852726 = weight(_text_:22 in 3036) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.053852726 = score(doc=3036,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17398734 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.049684696 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3036, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3036)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- The UK has not followed other countries in developing framworks of policies to guide their transition into information societies in a consistent and systematic way. Analyzes the current UK policies using a matrix which identifies 3 levels of policy (industrial, organization and social) and 4 cross cutting themes (information technology, information markets, human resources and legislation and regulation). Concludes that together, these various initiatives add up to a national strategy but it is one that lacks coordination and cohesion
- Date
- 22. 2.1999 17:03:18
-
Seiler, R.J.: Enhancing Internet access for people with disabilities (1998)
0.11
0.113588974 = product of:
0.17038345 = sum of:
0.14345708 = weight(_text_:systematic in 3609) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.14345708 = score(doc=3609,freq=2.0), product of:
0.28397155 = queryWeight, product of:
5.715473 = idf(docFreq=395, maxDocs=44218)
0.049684696 = queryNorm
0.5051812 = fieldWeight in 3609, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.715473 = idf(docFreq=395, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3609)
0.026926363 = product of:
0.053852726 = sum of:
0.053852726 = weight(_text_:22 in 3609) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.053852726 = score(doc=3609,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17398734 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.049684696 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3609, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3609)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- The EIA project was funded by the Online Public Access Initiative, a federal initiative of the australian Department of communications and the Arts. It was designed to establish a systematic method to introduce the Web to clients who have physical disability, are housebound, elderly, or are cognitively impaired. It was a touchscreen and kiosk Web browser to assist in overcoming various physical or cognitive hurdles
- Date
- 1. 8.1996 22:08:06
-
Blake, D.: Indexing the medical and biological sciences (1995)
0.11
0.10722388 = product of:
0.32167163 = sum of:
0.32167163 = sum of:
0.25435573 = weight(_text_:indexing in 768) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.25435573 = score(doc=768,freq=20.0), product of:
0.19018644 = queryWeight, product of:
3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
0.049684696 = queryNorm
1.337402 = fieldWeight in 768, product of:
4.472136 = tf(freq=20.0), with freq of:
20.0 = termFreq=20.0
3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=768)
0.06731591 = weight(_text_:22 in 768) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06731591 = score(doc=768,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17398734 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.049684696 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 768, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=768)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- COMPASS
- Science / Subject indexing
- Date
- 26. 7.2002 13:22:18
- LCSH
- Medicine / Abstracting and indexing
Biology / Abstracting and indexing
Life sciences / Abstracting and indexing
- Series
- Occasional papers on indexing; no.3
- Subject
- Medicine / Abstracting and indexing
Biology / Abstracting and indexing
Life sciences / Abstracting and indexing
Science / Subject indexing
-
Wissen in elektronischen Netzwerken : Strukturierung, Erschließung und Retrieval von Informationsressourcen im Internet. Eine Auswahl von Vorträgen der 19. Jahrestagung der Gesellschaft für Klassifikation, Basel 1995 (1995)
0.10
0.10245132 = product of:
0.15367697 = sum of:
0.12552495 = weight(_text_:systematic in 3198) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.12552495 = score(doc=3198,freq=2.0), product of:
0.28397155 = queryWeight, product of:
5.715473 = idf(docFreq=395, maxDocs=44218)
0.049684696 = queryNorm
0.44203353 = fieldWeight in 3198, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.715473 = idf(docFreq=395, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3198)
0.02815202 = product of:
0.05630404 = sum of:
0.05630404 = weight(_text_:indexing in 3198) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05630404 = score(doc=3198,freq=2.0), product of:
0.19018644 = queryWeight, product of:
3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
0.049684696 = queryNorm
0.29604656 = fieldWeight in 3198, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3198)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Content
- Enthält die Beiträge: PFEFFER, H.-J.: Gopher und Veronica; KOCH, T.: Searching the Web: systematic overview over indexes; JANKA, D.: Online-Bibliothekskataloge in Gopher und World Wide Web; PRICE, D.: Indexing the world: current developments in accessing distributed information; RUSCH-FEJA, D.D.: Structuring subject information sources in the Internet; KEMPF, A.: Forstliche Klassifikation und Meta-Information zum Wald im Internet; KOCH, T.: Improving resource discovery and retrieval on the Internet: the Nordic WAIS/World Wide Web Project and the classification of WAIS databases; ASSFOLG, R. u. R. HAMMWOEHNER: Das Konstanzer Hypertext-System (KHS) und das Worldwide Web (WWW): Mehrwert durch Integration
-
Garcia Marco, F.J.: Contexto y determinantes funcionales de la clasificacion documental (1996)
0.10
0.10245132 = product of:
0.15367697 = sum of:
0.12552495 = weight(_text_:systematic in 380) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.12552495 = score(doc=380,freq=2.0), product of:
0.28397155 = queryWeight, product of:
5.715473 = idf(docFreq=395, maxDocs=44218)
0.049684696 = queryNorm
0.44203353 = fieldWeight in 380, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.715473 = idf(docFreq=395, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=380)
0.02815202 = product of:
0.05630404 = sum of:
0.05630404 = weight(_text_:indexing in 380) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05630404 = score(doc=380,freq=2.0), product of:
0.19018644 = queryWeight, product of:
3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
0.049684696 = queryNorm
0.29604656 = fieldWeight in 380, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=380)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- Considers classification in the context of the information retrieval chain, a communication process. Defines classification as an heuristic methodology, which is being improved through scientific methodology. It is also an indexing process, setting each document in a systematic order, in a predictable place and therefore able to be efficiently retrieved. Classification appears to be determined by 4 factors: the structure of the world of documents, a function of the world of knowledge; the classification tools that allow us to codify them; the way in which people create and use classifications; and the features of the information unit
-
Rampelmann, J.: Classification tools at the EPO (1996)
0.10
0.10245132 = product of:
0.15367697 = sum of:
0.12552495 = weight(_text_:systematic in 2655) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.12552495 = score(doc=2655,freq=2.0), product of:
0.28397155 = queryWeight, product of:
5.715473 = idf(docFreq=395, maxDocs=44218)
0.049684696 = queryNorm
0.44203353 = fieldWeight in 2655, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.715473 = idf(docFreq=395, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2655)
0.02815202 = product of:
0.05630404 = sum of:
0.05630404 = weight(_text_:indexing in 2655) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05630404 = score(doc=2655,freq=2.0), product of:
0.19018644 = queryWeight, product of:
3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
0.049684696 = queryNorm
0.29604656 = fieldWeight in 2655, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2655)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- Describes the European Classification System (ECLA) used by search examiners at the General Directorate 1 (DG 1) of the European Patent Office in The Hague, Netherlands, for classifying patent applications for publication, new patent documents and non-patent literature for addition to the systematic search documentation. ECLA is an internal classification tool developed on the basis of the International Patent Classification (IPC) but with further subdivisions and better adaptation to the different technical fields. In order to overcome the limitations of a classification system, secondary systems are also in use or under development. One such system is the ICO (In Computer Only) system which offers online only light indexing schenmes for the identification of additional information contained in patent documents
-
Bell, H.K.: Indexing biographies, and other stories of human lives (1992)
0.09
0.09127384 = product of:
0.2738215 = sum of:
0.2738215 = sum of:
0.19304243 = weight(_text_:indexing in 5396) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.19304243 = score(doc=5396,freq=8.0), product of:
0.19018644 = queryWeight, product of:
3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
0.049684696 = queryNorm
1.0150168 = fieldWeight in 5396, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5396)
0.08077908 = weight(_text_:22 in 5396) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08077908 = score(doc=5396,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17398734 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.049684696 = queryNorm
0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 5396, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5396)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- COMPASS
- Subject indexing
- Footnote
- Rez. in: Knowledge organization 22(1995) no.1, S.46-47 (R. Fugmann)
- Series
- Occasional papers on indexing; no.1
- Subject
- Subject indexing
-
Boynton, J.: Identifying systematic reviews in MEDLINE : developing an objective approach to search strategy design (1998)
0.09
0.08784916 = product of:
0.26354748 = sum of:
0.26354748 = weight(_text_:systematic in 2660) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.26354748 = score(doc=2660,freq=12.0), product of:
0.28397155 = queryWeight, product of:
5.715473 = idf(docFreq=395, maxDocs=44218)
0.049684696 = queryNorm
0.9280771 = fieldWeight in 2660, product of:
3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
12.0 = termFreq=12.0
5.715473 = idf(docFreq=395, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2660)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- Systematic reviews are becoming increasingly important for health care professionals seeking to provide evidence based health care. In the past, systematic reviews have been difficult to identify among the mass of literature labelled 'reviews'. Reports results of a study to design search strategies based on a more objective approach to strategy construction. MEDLINE was chosen as the database and word frequencies in the titles, abstracts and subject keywords of a collection of systematic reviews of the effective health care interventions were analyzed to derive a highly sensitive search strategy. 'Sensitivity' was used in preference to the usual term 'recall' as one of the measures (in addition to the usual 'precision'). The proposed strategy was found to offer 98% sensitivity in retrieving systematic reviews, while retaining a low but acceptable level of precision (20%). Reports results using other strategies with other levels of sensitivity and precision. Concludes that it is possible to use frequency analysis to generate highly sensitive strategies when retrieving systematic reviews
-
Spiteri, L.F.: ¬The essential elements of faceted thesauri (1999)
0.09
0.08781542 = product of:
0.13172312 = sum of:
0.10759281 = weight(_text_:systematic in 5362) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.10759281 = score(doc=5362,freq=2.0), product of:
0.28397155 = queryWeight, product of:
5.715473 = idf(docFreq=395, maxDocs=44218)
0.049684696 = queryNorm
0.3788859 = fieldWeight in 5362, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.715473 = idf(docFreq=395, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5362)
0.024130303 = product of:
0.048260607 = sum of:
0.048260607 = weight(_text_:indexing in 5362) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.048260607 = score(doc=5362,freq=2.0), product of:
0.19018644 = queryWeight, product of:
3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
0.049684696 = queryNorm
0.2537542 = fieldWeight in 5362, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5362)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- The goal of this study is to evaluate, compare, and contrast how facet analysis is used to construct the systematic or faceted displays of a selection of information retrieval thesauri. More specifically, the study seeks to examine which principles of facet analysis are used in the thesauri, and the extent to which different thesauri apply these principles in the same way. A measuring instrument was designed for the purpose of evaluating the structure of faceted thesauri. This instrument was applied to fourteen faceted information retrieval thesauri. The study reveals that the thesauri do not share a common definition of what constitutes a facet. In some cases, the thesauri apply both enumerative-style classification and facet analysis to arrange their indexing terms. A number of the facets used in the thesauri are not homogeneous or mutually exclusive. The principle of synthesis is used in only 50% of the thesauri, and no one citation order is used consistently by the thesauri.
-
Williamson, N.J.: Standards and rules for subject access (1996)
0.09
0.08781542 = product of:
0.13172312 = sum of:
0.10759281 = weight(_text_:systematic in 5577) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.10759281 = score(doc=5577,freq=2.0), product of:
0.28397155 = queryWeight, product of:
5.715473 = idf(docFreq=395, maxDocs=44218)
0.049684696 = queryNorm
0.3788859 = fieldWeight in 5577, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.715473 = idf(docFreq=395, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5577)
0.024130303 = product of:
0.048260607 = sum of:
0.048260607 = weight(_text_:indexing in 5577) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.048260607 = score(doc=5577,freq=2.0), product of:
0.19018644 = queryWeight, product of:
3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
0.049684696 = queryNorm
0.2537542 = fieldWeight in 5577, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5577)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- Standardization of subject access to bibliographic information systems is an important factor in national and international networking, cooperation, and exchange of bibliographic data. Standards, guidelines, and rules are needed to ensure consistency and quality in the design, development and application of indexing languages to documents and their citations. This paper defines the terms "standards" and "guidelines" as they apply to subject analysis used in library catalogs and bibliographic databases. It identifies and discusses the most important national and international "standards" that influence subject access to bibliographic data. Included are the tools of subject cataloging which have become standards in their own right, as well as formally prepared and approved guidelines. Each "standard" or "guideline" is described in terms of its origins, characteristics, and control and its importance in the design of bibliographic retrieval systems. Emphasis is given to the importance of the relationship between alphabetic and systematic access.
-
Rowlands, I.: Understanding information policy : concepts, frameworks and research tools (1996)
0.09
0.08519173 = product of:
0.12778759 = sum of:
0.10759281 = weight(_text_:systematic in 4339) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.10759281 = score(doc=4339,freq=2.0), product of:
0.28397155 = queryWeight, product of:
5.715473 = idf(docFreq=395, maxDocs=44218)
0.049684696 = queryNorm
0.3788859 = fieldWeight in 4339, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.715473 = idf(docFreq=395, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4339)
0.02019477 = product of:
0.04038954 = sum of:
0.04038954 = weight(_text_:22 in 4339) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04038954 = score(doc=4339,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17398734 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.049684696 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4339, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4339)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- This paper considers the need for a more systematic and critical approach to the academic study of information policy at national and international level. It reviews the complex, multifaceted nature of large-scale information policy problems and considers some of the main sources of confusion in the journal literature. It is argued that while information policy has been largey technology-driven, the consideration of information policy has, for historical reasons, typically been discipline-bounded. This has contributed to a fragmentation of research effort and a lack of consensus on the most appropriate home discipline for the study of information policy. In the search for a more critical scientific understanding of information policy issues, a brief review is made of the strenghts, limitations and applicability of the broad theoretical and methodological approaches which have been adopted, often implicitly, by writers reporting in the library and information science literature. The paper concludes with a consideration of some desirable characteristics for the design of information policy studies
- Source
- Journal of information science. 22(1996) no.1, S.13-25
-
Sauperl, A.; Saye, J.D.: Pebbles for the mosais of cataloging expertise : what do problems in expert systems for cataloging reveal about cataloging expertise? (1999)
0.09
0.08519173 = product of:
0.12778759 = sum of:
0.10759281 = weight(_text_:systematic in 103) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.10759281 = score(doc=103,freq=2.0), product of:
0.28397155 = queryWeight, product of:
5.715473 = idf(docFreq=395, maxDocs=44218)
0.049684696 = queryNorm
0.3788859 = fieldWeight in 103, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.715473 = idf(docFreq=395, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=103)
0.02019477 = product of:
0.04038954 = sum of:
0.04038954 = weight(_text_:22 in 103) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04038954 = score(doc=103,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17398734 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.049684696 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 103, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=103)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- Twenty-five years of research in expert systems for descriptive cataloging and related areas are reviewed. Researchers who developed prototype expert cataloging systems in the 1980s found that cataloging rules are extremely comprehensive and complicated, but still insufficient to permit these systems accurate cataloging results. Those researchers also identified smaller areas that need to be pursued for successful implementation of expert cataloging systems. Subsequent research has focused on narrower areas. Cataloging rules were studied and more was learned about problems with their logic structure and organization. Another focus was optical reading of bibliographic elements in documents. Categories of responsibility and graphic design continue to pose problems. The visual characteristics of documents were studied to understand more about the automatic recognition of bibliographic elements necessary for the bibliographic description of documents. The systematic study of the cataloging process, necessary for development of expert systems, may result in improvement of manual working procedures and enrich the education of new catalogers.
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
-
Riesthuis, G.J.A.; Stuurman, P.: Tendenzen in de onderwerpsontsluiting : T.4: Onderwerpsontsluiting en on-line catalogi (1990)
0.08
0.08449805 = product of:
0.25349414 = sum of:
0.25349414 = sum of:
0.15925187 = weight(_text_:indexing in 211) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.15925187 = score(doc=211,freq=4.0), product of:
0.19018644 = queryWeight, product of:
3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
0.049684696 = queryNorm
0.8373461 = fieldWeight in 211, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=211)
0.09424227 = weight(_text_:22 in 211) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09424227 = score(doc=211,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17398734 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.049684696 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 211, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=211)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Footnote
- Übers. des Titels: Trends in subject indexing: subject indexing and online catalogues
- Source
- Open. 22(1990) no.10, S.326-330
-
Døsen, K.: One more reference on self-reference (1992)
0.08
0.078800134 = product of:
0.2364004 = sum of:
0.2364004 = sum of:
0.12869495 = weight(_text_:indexing in 4604) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.12869495 = score(doc=4604,freq=2.0), product of:
0.19018644 = queryWeight, product of:
3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
0.049684696 = queryNorm
0.6766778 = fieldWeight in 4604, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4604)
0.10770545 = weight(_text_:22 in 4604) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.10770545 = score(doc=4604,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17398734 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.049684696 = queryNorm
0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 4604, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4604)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Date
- 7. 2.2005 14:10:22
- Theme
- Citation indexing
