Search (9 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × theme_ss:"Suchtaktik"
  • × year_i:[2000 TO 2010}
  1. Drabenstott, K.M.: Web search strategies (2000) 0.07
    0.06817683 = product of:
      0.17044207 = sum of:
        0.1441545 = weight(_text_:nexis in 1188) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.1441545 = score(doc=1188,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.39776745 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.200379 = idf(docFreq=32, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04850598 = queryNorm
            0.362409 = fieldWeight in 1188, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.200379 = idf(docFreq=32, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1188)
        0.026287563 = weight(_text_:22 in 1188) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.026287563 = score(doc=1188,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16985968 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04850598 = queryNorm
            0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 1188, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1188)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Abstract
    Surfing the World Wide Web used to be cool, dude, real cool. But things have gotten hot - so hot that finding something useful an the Web is no longer cool. It is suffocating Web searchers in the smoke and debris of mountain-sized lists of hits, decisions about which search engines they should use, whether they will get lost in the dizzying maze of a subject directory, use the right syntax for the search engine at hand, enter keywords that are likely to retrieve hits an the topics they have in mind, or enlist a browser that has sufficient functionality to display the most promising hits. When it comes to Web searching, in a few short years we have gone from the cool image of surfing the Web into the frying pan of searching the Web. We can turn down the heat by rethinking what Web searchers are doing and introduce some order into the chaos. Web search strategies that are tool-based-oriented to specific Web searching tools such as search en gines, subject directories, and meta search engines-have been widely promoted, and these strategies are just not working. It is time to dissect what Web searching tools expect from searchers and adjust our search strategies to these new tools. This discussion offers Web searchers help in the form of search strategies that are based an strategies that librarians have been using for a long time to search commercial information retrieval systems like Dialog, NEXIS, Wilsonline, FirstSearch, and Data-Star.
    Date
    22. 9.1997 19:16:05
  2. Branch, J.L.: Investigating the information-seeking process of adolescents : the value of using think alouds and think afters (2000) 0.02
    0.018401293 = product of:
      0.09200647 = sum of:
        0.09200647 = weight(_text_:22 in 3924) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.09200647 = score(doc=3924,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16985968 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04850598 = queryNorm
            0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 3924, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3924)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Source
    Library and information science research. 22(2000) no.4, S.371-382
  3. Lin, S.-j.; Belkin, N.: Validation of a model of information seeking over multiple search sessions (2005) 0.01
    0.007886268 = product of:
      0.03943134 = sum of:
        0.03943134 = weight(_text_:22 in 3450) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03943134 = score(doc=3450,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16985968 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04850598 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3450, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3450)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Date
    10. 4.2005 14:52:22
  4. Koopmans, N.I.: What's your question? : The need for research information from the perspective of different user groups (2002) 0.01
    0.007886268 = product of:
      0.03943134 = sum of:
        0.03943134 = weight(_text_:22 in 3612) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03943134 = score(doc=3612,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16985968 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04850598 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3612, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3612)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Date
    2. 7.2005 12:22:50
  5. Crestani, F.; Du, H.: Written versus spoken queries : a qualitative and quantitative comparative analysis (2006) 0.01
    0.007886268 = product of:
      0.03943134 = sum of:
        0.03943134 = weight(_text_:22 in 5047) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03943134 = score(doc=5047,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16985968 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04850598 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 5047, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5047)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Date
    5. 6.2006 11:22:23
  6. Xu, Y.: ¬The dynamics of interactive information retrieval behavior : part I: an activity theory perspective (2007) 0.01
    0.007886268 = product of:
      0.03943134 = sum of:
        0.03943134 = weight(_text_:22 in 331) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03943134 = score(doc=331,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16985968 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04850598 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 331, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=331)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Date
    27. 5.2007 13:55:22
  7. Lee, S.-S.; Theng, Y.-L.; Goh, D.H.-L.: Creative information seeking : part II: empirical verification (2007) 0.01
    0.007886268 = product of:
      0.03943134 = sum of:
        0.03943134 = weight(_text_:22 in 813) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03943134 = score(doc=813,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16985968 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04850598 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 813, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=813)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Date
    23.12.2007 12:22:16
  8. Vakkari, P.; Pennanen, M.; Serola, S.: Changes of search terms and tactics while writing a research proposal : a longitudinal case study (2003) 0.01
    0.0065718913 = product of:
      0.032859456 = sum of:
        0.032859456 = weight(_text_:22 in 1073) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.032859456 = score(doc=1073,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16985968 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04850598 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1073, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1073)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Abstract
    The study analyses how students' growing understanding of the topic and search experience were related to their choice of search tactics and terms while preparing a research proposal for a small empirical study. In addition to that, the findings of the study are used to test Vakkari's (2001) theory of task-based IR. The research subjects were 22 students of psychology attending a seminar for preparing the proposal. They made a search for their task in PsychINFO database at the beginning and end of the seminar. Data were collected in several ways. A pre- and post-search interview was conducted in both sessions. The students were asked to think aloud in the sessions. This was recorded as were the transaction logs. The results show that search experience was slightly related to the change of facets. Although the students' vocabulary of the topic grew generating an increased use of specific terms between the sessions, their use of search tactics and operators remained fairly constant. There was no correlation between the terms and tactics used and the total number of useful references found. By comparing these results with the findings of relevant earlier studies the conclusion was drawn that domain knowledge has an impact on searching assuming that users have a sufficient command of the system used. This implies that the tested theory of task-based IR is valid on condition that the searchers are experienced. It is suggested that the theory should be enriched by including search experience in its scope.
  9. Mansourian, Y.: Contextual elements and conceptual components of information visibility on the web (2008) 0.01
    0.0065718913 = product of:
      0.032859456 = sum of:
        0.032859456 = weight(_text_:22 in 2603) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.032859456 = score(doc=2603,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16985968 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04850598 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2603, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2603)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Date
    1. 1.2009 10:22:40