-
Ross, J.: ¬The impact of technology on indexing (2000)
0.03
0.027058888 = product of:
0.054117776 = sum of:
0.054117776 = product of:
0.10823555 = sum of:
0.10823555 = weight(_text_:22 in 263) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.10823555 = score(doc=263,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17484367 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04992923 = queryNorm
0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 263, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=263)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Indexer. 22(2000) no.1, S.25-26
-
Walker, A.: Indexing commonplace books : John Locke's method (2001)
0.03
0.027058888 = product of:
0.054117776 = sum of:
0.054117776 = product of:
0.10823555 = sum of:
0.10823555 = weight(_text_:22 in 13) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.10823555 = score(doc=13,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17484367 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04992923 = queryNorm
0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 13, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=13)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Indexer. 22(2001) no.3, S.14-18
-
Crystal, D.: Quote index unquote (2000)
0.03
0.027058888 = product of:
0.054117776 = sum of:
0.054117776 = product of:
0.10823555 = sum of:
0.10823555 = weight(_text_:22 in 487) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.10823555 = score(doc=487,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17484367 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04992923 = queryNorm
0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 487, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=487)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Indexer. 22(2000) no.1, S.14-20
-
Matthews, D.: Indexing published letters (2001)
0.03
0.027058888 = product of:
0.054117776 = sum of:
0.054117776 = product of:
0.10823555 = sum of:
0.10823555 = weight(_text_:22 in 4160) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.10823555 = score(doc=4160,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17484367 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04992923 = queryNorm
0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 4160, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4160)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Indexer. 22(2001) no.3, S.135-141
-
Gratch, B.; Settel, B.; Atherton, P.: Characteristics of book indexes for subject retrieval in the humanities and social sciences (1978)
0.02
0.023676526 = product of:
0.04735305 = sum of:
0.04735305 = product of:
0.0947061 = sum of:
0.0947061 = weight(_text_:22 in 1061) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0947061 = score(doc=1061,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17484367 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04992923 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 1061, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1061)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Indexer. 11(1978), S.14-22
-
Davis, M.: Building a global legal index : a work in progress (2001)
0.02
0.023676526 = product of:
0.04735305 = sum of:
0.04735305 = product of:
0.0947061 = sum of:
0.0947061 = weight(_text_:22 in 6443) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0947061 = score(doc=6443,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17484367 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04992923 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 6443, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6443)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Indexer. 22(2001) no.3, S.123-127
-
Browne, G.: ¬The definite article : acknowledging The in index entries (2001)
0.02
0.023676526 = product of:
0.04735305 = sum of:
0.04735305 = product of:
0.0947061 = sum of:
0.0947061 = weight(_text_:22 in 12) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0947061 = score(doc=12,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17484367 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04992923 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 12, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=12)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Indexer. 22(2001) no.3, S.119-122
-
Weinberg, B.H.: Book indexes in France : medieval specimens and modern practices (2000)
0.02
0.023676526 = product of:
0.04735305 = sum of:
0.04735305 = product of:
0.0947061 = sum of:
0.0947061 = weight(_text_:22 in 486) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0947061 = score(doc=486,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17484367 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04992923 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 486, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=486)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Indexer. 22(2000) no.1, S.2-13
-
Mauer, P.: Embedded indexing : pros and cons for the indexer (2000)
0.02
0.023676526 = product of:
0.04735305 = sum of:
0.04735305 = product of:
0.0947061 = sum of:
0.0947061 = weight(_text_:22 in 488) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0947061 = score(doc=488,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17484367 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04992923 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 488, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=488)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Indexer. 22(2000) no.1, S.27-28
-
Anderson, C.R.: Indexing with a computer : past and present (2000)
0.02
0.023676526 = product of:
0.04735305 = sum of:
0.04735305 = product of:
0.0947061 = sum of:
0.0947061 = weight(_text_:22 in 489) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0947061 = score(doc=489,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17484367 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04992923 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 489, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=489)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Indexer. 22(2000) no.1, S.23-24
-
Lee, D.: Judging indexes : the criteria for a good index (2001)
0.02
0.023676526 = product of:
0.04735305 = sum of:
0.04735305 = product of:
0.0947061 = sum of:
0.0947061 = weight(_text_:22 in 4162) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0947061 = score(doc=4162,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17484367 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04992923 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 4162, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4162)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Indexer. 22(2001) no.4, S.191-194
-
Weinberg, B.H.: Predecessors of scientific indexing structures in the domain of religion (2001)
0.02
0.023676526 = product of:
0.04735305 = sum of:
0.04735305 = product of:
0.0947061 = sum of:
0.0947061 = weight(_text_:22 in 4172) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0947061 = score(doc=4172,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17484367 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04992923 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 4172, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4172)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Indexer. 22(2001) no.4, S.178-180
-
Weinberg, B.H.: Index structures in early Hebrew Biblical word lists : preludes to the first Latin concordances (2004)
0.02
0.023676526 = product of:
0.04735305 = sum of:
0.04735305 = product of:
0.0947061 = sum of:
0.0947061 = weight(_text_:22 in 4180) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0947061 = score(doc=4180,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17484367 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04992923 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 4180, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4180)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 17.10.2005 13:54:22
-
Bell, H.K.: Indexing biographies, and other stories of human lives (1992)
0.02
0.020294165 = product of:
0.04058833 = sum of:
0.04058833 = product of:
0.08117666 = sum of:
0.08117666 = weight(_text_:22 in 5396) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08117666 = score(doc=5396,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17484367 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04992923 = queryNorm
0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 5396, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5396)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Footnote
- Rez. in: Knowledge organization 22(1995) no.1, S.46-47 (R. Fugmann)
-
Lathrop, L.: ¬An indexer's guide to the Internet (1999)
0.02
0.020294165 = product of:
0.04058833 = sum of:
0.04058833 = product of:
0.08117666 = sum of:
0.08117666 = weight(_text_:22 in 485) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08117666 = score(doc=485,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17484367 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04992923 = queryNorm
0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 485, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=485)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Footnote
- Rez. in: Indexer 22(2000) no.1, S.51 (R. Davis)
-
Weinberg, B.H.: ¬The body of a reference work in relation to its index : an analysis of wordsmanship (1996)
0.02
0.019133523 = product of:
0.038267046 = sum of:
0.038267046 = product of:
0.07653409 = sum of:
0.07653409 = weight(_text_:22 in 6940) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07653409 = score(doc=6940,freq=4.0), product of:
0.17484367 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04992923 = queryNorm
0.4377287 = fieldWeight in 6940, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6940)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 8. 3.1997 20:22:25
- Source
- Indexer. 20(1996) no.1, S.18-22
-
Olason, S.C.: Let's get usable! : Usability studies for indexes (2000)
0.02
0.019133523 = product of:
0.038267046 = sum of:
0.038267046 = product of:
0.07653409 = sum of:
0.07653409 = weight(_text_:22 in 882) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07653409 = score(doc=882,freq=4.0), product of:
0.17484367 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04992923 = queryNorm
0.4377287 = fieldWeight in 882, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=882)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Footnote
- Vgl.: http://www.theindexer.org/files/22-2-olason.pdf.
- Source
- Indexer. 22(2000) no.2, S.91-95
-
Bell, H.K.: History of societies of indexing : part VII: 1992-95 (2000)
0.02
0.016911805 = product of:
0.03382361 = sum of:
0.03382361 = product of:
0.06764722 = sum of:
0.06764722 = weight(_text_:22 in 113) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06764722 = score(doc=113,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17484367 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04992923 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 113, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=113)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Indexer. 22(2000) no.2, S.81-83
-
Software for Indexing (2003)
0.01
0.014949897 = product of:
0.029899795 = sum of:
0.029899795 = product of:
0.05979959 = sum of:
0.05979959 = weight(_text_:master in 2294) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05979959 = score(doc=2294,freq=2.0), product of:
0.32877895 = queryWeight, product of:
6.5848994 = idf(docFreq=165, maxDocs=44218)
0.04992923 = queryNorm
0.18188387 = fieldWeight in 2294, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
6.5848994 = idf(docFreq=165, maxDocs=44218)
0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=2294)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Footnote
- A chapter an image indexing starts with a useful discussion of the elements of bibliographic description needed for visual materials and of the variations in the functioning and naming of functions in different software packaltes. Sample features are discussed in light of four different software systems: MAVIS, Convera Screening Room, CONTENTdm, and Virage speech and pattern recognition programs. The chapter concludes with an overview of what one has to consider when choosing a system. The last chapter in this section is an oddball one an creating a back-ofthe-book index using Microsoft Excel. The author warns: "It is not pretty, and it is not recommended" (p.209). A curiosity, but it should have been included as a counterpoint in the first part, not as part of the database indexing section. The final section begins with an excellent article an voice recognition software (Dragon Naturally Speaking Preferred), followed by a look at "automatic indexing" through a critique of Sonar Bookends Automatic Indexing Generator. The final two chapters deal with Data Harmony's Machine Aided Indexer; one of them refers specifically to a news content indexing system. In terms of scope, this reviewer would have liked to see thesaurus management software included since thesaurus management and the integration of thesauri with database indexing software are common and time-consuming concerns. There are also a few editorial glitches, such as the placement of the oddball article and inconsistent uses of fonts and caps (eg: VIRAGE and Virage), but achieving consistency with this many authors is, indeed, a difficult task. More serious is the fact that the index is inconsistent. It reads as if authors submitted their own keywords which were then harmonized, so that the level of indexing varies by chapter. For example, there is an entry for "controlled vocabulary" (p.265) (singular) with one locator, no cross-references. There is an entry for "thesaurus software" (p.274) with two locators, plus a separate one for "Thesaurus Master" (p.274) with three locators. There are also references to thesauri/ controlled vocabularies/taxonomies that are not mentioned in the index (e.g., the section Thesaurus management an p.204). This is sad. All too often indexing texts have poor indexes, I suppose because we are as prone to having to work under time pressures as the rest of the authors and editors in the world. But a good index that meets basic criteria should be a highlight in any book related to indexing. Overall this is a useful, if uneven, collection of articles written over the past few years. Because of the great variation between articles both in subject and in approach, there is something for everyone. The collection will be interesting to anyone who wants to be aware of how indexing software works and what it can do. I also definitely recommend it for information science teaching collections since the explanations of the software carry implicit in them descriptions of how the indexing process itself is approached. However, the book's utility as a guide to purchasing choices is limited because of the unevenness; the vendor-written articles and testimonials are interesting and can certainly be helpful, but there are not nearly enough objective reviews. This is not a straight listing and comparison of software packaltes, but it deserves wide circulation since it presents an overall picture of the state of indexing software used by freelancers."
-
Crawley, J.; Adams, C.: InfoAccess Project : comparing print, CD-ROM, and inhouse indexes (1991)
0.01
0.013529444 = product of:
0.027058888 = sum of:
0.027058888 = product of:
0.054117776 = sum of:
0.054117776 = weight(_text_:22 in 4824) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.054117776 = score(doc=4824,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17484367 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04992923 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4824, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4824)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Describes the InfoAccess Project at the Univ of Saskatchewan Libraries which compared searching of manual and automated indexes by 22 undergraduate psychology students to determine their searching preferences by ranking 'Psychological abstracts' in 3 formats: print, CD-ROM and a locally mounted tape service called InfoAccess. Their satisfaction regarding the physical environment, equipment, and instructional aids was also recorded. Users preferred to search with CD-ROM, but found InfoAccess to be an acceptable alternative
